Why the Sling TSI is Extremely Well Designed

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 26. 07. 2024
  • There is no doubt that the Sling TSi is a very versatile, reliable, and fast aircraft that has earned its popularity among aviation enthusiasts. Thanks to its systems and avionics, it is able to offer a high degree of confidence and safety when flying, even if whoever is in charge is not an expert pilot, so it is great for those who are looking to get started in this world. With a plane as well balanced as this one, you will have it all; comfort, performance, speed, and you will save a bit of money when compared to other planes in this class. If you're looking for a 4-seat aircraft, you'll definitely have to take a look at this option. This is not a great aircraft; this is an exceptional aircraft.
    #Sling #SlingTSI #SlingAircraft
    Chapters:
    00:00 - Introduction
    01:05 - Design/Exterior
    03:04 - Interior
    04:42 - Engine
    05:58 - Performance
    06:46 - Avionics and Systems
    09:15 - Cost
    10:32 - Pros
    11:21 - Cons
    11:44 - Conclusion
    _________________________________________________
    To contact me directly: Dashboardglobal@techie.com
    _________________________________________________
    Our channel is about Aviation.
    We make the best educational aviation videos you've ever seen; my videos are designed to clear misunderstandings about airplanes and explain complicated aviation topics in a simple way.

Komentáře • 38

  • @stevev4057
    @stevev4057 Před 11 měsíci +3

    With the addition of the 141 turbo engine, @14.5k electronically controlled propeller system (air master) and the Eco mode option engaged range is 1200 nautical miles a 5.8 gallon per hour burn at 120 kn air speed for Just being about 150 55 ground speed.
    On four dollars super unleaded . Plugs don’t foul no bad smell.
    I hanger with the top of the line 182, which I have flown on multiple occasions, brand new with modified wings and engine.
    The difference between a slide rule, designed airplanes from 50 years ago and a super computer designed modern vehicle .

  • @onebravotango
    @onebravotango Před 11 měsíci +1

    Absolutely fantastic review! The Sling TSi sounds like a remarkable aircraft with its versatile features and impressive performance. Your insights are incredibly informative for anyone considering diving into the world of aviation. Thanks for sharing this detailed overview! ✈👍

  • @stewie84
    @stewie84 Před 10 měsíci +1

    New kits come with 916 iS engine now boosting take-off power significantly (vs the 915 iS) from 141 to 160 HP and slightly increasing continuous power from 135 to 137 HP

  • @naturethrillers
    @naturethrillers Před rokem

    Cool Narrator; nice graphics

  • @thebluproject5688
    @thebluproject5688 Před rokem +6

    "Antenna with the range up to 250 knots" - LOL

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem +1

      Nautical miles

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem

      When we use knots as speed, it's nautical miles per hour. In this case they're dropping the airspeed and just using nautical miles rather than statute miles.

    • @TheWilliamHoganExperience
      @TheWilliamHoganExperience Před 11 měsíci +1

      Ai generated narration

  • @waltperko8389
    @waltperko8389 Před rokem +3

    When are they going to introduce digital communications where whomever they're supposed to be talking to on the ground sends the next frequency directly into the comm and nav radios? IF the pilot only has to press one button and not dial-in a frequency that makes it easier to fly the airplane in all conditions, plus the radio could maintain a record of the last 1,000 or more frequencies used.

    • @Captndarty
      @Captndarty Před rokem +1

      CPDLC…

    • @waltperko8389
      @waltperko8389 Před rokem

      @@Captndarty Does CPDLC automatically input the next frequency into the radios? That's what I'm asking ... I think the radio should maintain a history of used frequencies as well as get updated by the ground controllers when they hand the aircraft off to another control center. The radio would then at hand-off automatically switch to the new frequency.

    • @Captndarty
      @Captndarty Před rokem +5

      @@waltperko8389 if you can’t tune the radio you shouldn’t be flying. I don’t want my radio automatically switching on me. It would inevitably fail or switch without you now, and you wouldn’t know or remember the correct frequency.

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem +2

      A lot of the new Garmin avionics allow you to select a location on the screen and then see the current frequencies in use at that location and each airspace and touch to tune.

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem

      @@waltperko8389 Yes it does this. There's already a protocol for this. Mostly airliners have it but there are a couple experimental GA planes that have it. Technically the sling TSI can get it with avidine.

  • @tomedgar4375
    @tomedgar4375 Před rokem +1

    Nice ride but the initial cost would keep me in an older piper or bonanza

    • @redblack8414
      @redblack8414 Před 10 měsíci +1

      Beech Bonanzas are for experienced pilots. They are not powered by a 141 hp engine, they have a retractable landing gear and are not called ''doctors killers'' for nothing. Maybe you have the skills for flying one without difficulty but you have to admit that Bonanzas and Slings are not in the same league. I agree with you that the initial cost of the TSI is rather steep and I will add that you don't have to build the Piper or Bonanza in your garage.😀

  • @ibgarrett
    @ibgarrett Před rokem +1

    The data is a bit outdated in this presentation. The fuel tanks are now 26 gallons on each side for a total of 52 gallons.

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem +3

      75 gallons with the long-range tanks. 10 hours of endurance is incredible

    • @zakariahofra6027
      @zakariahofra6027 Před rokem

      How much is the range with 75 gallon?

    • @ibgarrett
      @ibgarrett Před rokem +1

      @@zakariahofra6027 Some of it is going to depend upon how you're flying and the winds aloft. Assuming no winds aloft and cruise speed it burns around 8 gallons per hour - so 75 gallons is around 9 hrs...

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem +2

      @@zakariahofra6027 Well at 8 gallons per hour do the math, minus 30 minutes at 10 gallons per hour in the climb.
      With 45 minutes of reserve it's about 8 and 1/2 hours, and at 140 knots is 1190. In the real world you get about 1125

  • @kayschmitz1155
    @kayschmitz1155 Před rokem +1

    thought they were metric in S A

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem

      They use feet for altitude throughout the entire world because in aviation meters make no sense. All of the atmospheric condition conversions are done in imperial units and the conversion rates can be done in your head. With metric the units were made to be times 10 * 10 * 10, with imperial aviation they were meant to be whatever was the most sensible

  • @user-ej9jq2zf1y
    @user-ej9jq2zf1y Před 11 měsíci +2

    I am out at that cost 😞😞😞

  • @OneRayMac
    @OneRayMac Před rokem

    Not an ultralight. Lol

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem +1

      For the rest of the world it's considered an ultralight, which is why you can just build and fly it. You can even buy it pre-built and fly it without certification. The only exception is the United States... United States alone does not classify it as an ultralight

  • @wernerdanler2742
    @wernerdanler2742 Před rokem

    For the cost, it's way to slow.

    • @blindsight_music_
      @blindsight_music_ Před rokem +3

      Price shouldn’t be directly proportional to speed lol. A fast plane can be a shit plane, and a slow plane can be great

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem +5

      I mean, there's nothing comparable that goes faster. Keep in mind that this holds a thousand pounds easy, and can go 160 true airspeed at high altitude. This thing can climb up to 28,000 ft no problem...

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery Před rokem +3

      Please remember that The cheaper a plane is to buy, the more expensive it is to own. Yeah you can definitely buy a Mooney and it will go faster for less money, but you will also be paying over $100 an hour In fuel and maintenance.
      The sling TSI cost only $30. So If you plan to fly somewhat frequently, this sling is better

  • @TheWilliamHoganExperience
    @TheWilliamHoganExperience Před 11 měsíci

    Ai generated narration - Show your face and prove me wrong.

  • @jingle1161
    @jingle1161 Před 6 měsíci

    What an annoying AI voice.

  • @flexairz
    @flexairz Před 6 měsíci

    This video is FULL of errors.. please take it down.