Survivor Winners at War: The Jury Casts Their Votes
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 05. 2020
- Survivor Winners at War: The Jury Speeches / Votes
Survivor Winners at War: Jury Votes For the Winner
The Tribe Has Spoken
See how each of the Jury Members Voted For In the Finale
Like & Subscribe to support our channel and for more Survivor content!
Thank you for the support!
No copyright infringement intended. All credits to CBS CID
Watch Survivor: www.cbs.com/shows/survivor/ - Zábava
Robs confessional was so badass
Indeed it was
Hey Victor lmao
Love or hate Boston Rob, that is one of the best voting confessionals in Survivor History.
Easily. It's so strange how it gives me goosebumps when he says it lol
I agree! I am glad he became a juror this season. I just imagine that Sandra would have been a great juror too with a lot of Ponderosa content.
Rob, a legendary Survivor player and definitely one of the greats, vote for Tony to be the “King” of Survivor.
I bet Tony felt honored to have Rob vote for him.
The only time Boston Rob was on the jury. He does not waste his only voting confessional
HATE
"I'll see you in Los Angeles for the reading of the Votes"
Technically, he did read the votes in Los Angeles
That didn’t age well
@@awesumwasum7228 but he didn’t ‘see’ them..
@@bbw1979 he saw them virtually
@@brokenpikachu9491 yeah I know but not in LA
0:38 the smooth subtleness of this was amazing. The parchment flipping delay, the audience tricking motion. I love this. Kinda reminds me of Alecia voting for Amber to win All Stars except better
JPB productions Ik plus on top of that villanelle in the background
The Alecia comparison holds water. I think with this Rob did this with respect rather than spite. It's not that he voted against Natalie, he voted FOR Tony. Alecia definitely voted against Rob.
This jury was MASSIVE
Yeah, it’s literally the rest of the contestants - minus Sandra as she technically quit
@@AstroFox77 nooo sandra shouldve been in the jury!!
nah it looks pretty small
Of course rob gave the best confessional. That was a given.
Would have been funny had he said, "I'll see you on the Zoom meet for the reading of the votes."
parvati must’ve thought she was voting for Natalie Bolton
normie disguised as a meme account Lol good one, it’s especially funny because I just finished rewatching Micronesia
She didn't ask about her game in the bedroom though.
Parvati is a horrible juror
@@Ramboost007 she's not exactly used to it though so i dont really blame her
@@itzwakk335 neither are most one time jurors? lol
12 Votes Tony
Amber [All Stars]
Rob [Redemption Island]
Yul [Cook Islands]
Sophie [South Pacific]
Kim [One World]
Denise [Philippines]
Nick [David vs Goliath]
Wendell [Ghost Island]
Adam [Millennials vs Gen X]
Sarah [Game Changers]
Ben [Heroes vs Healers vs Hustlers]
Danni [Guatemala]
4 Votes Natalie
Ethan [Africa]
Parvati [Micronesia]
Tyson [Blood vs Water]
Jeremy [Second Chance]
1 Vote Sandra Bench
Sandra [Pearl Islands, Heroes vs. Villains]
Are u bored or summat’ 😂
Atleast 4 of Tony's votes that went to Tony would of been put on Michele if Natalie wasn't there, Yul, Ben, Adam, Wendell and I think 2 others were leaning towards Michele, but they voted for Tony cause they felt Natalie didn't deserve it, if they had voted the way they wanted it would of been a 6 - 6 - 4 with Natalie deciding who wins, I'm still surprised Jeremy voted for Natalie over Michele
@@WTC-1990 The people that were willing to vote Michele weren't willing to vote her because they wanted her to win, but they wanted her to get second place over Natalie. The reason they stuck with their natural winner pick in Tony was because they didn't want to give Natalie the win by splitting between Tony and Michele. It's the same reason Reed voted Jaclyn in SJDS, it was just to spite Missy. But if there was a chance it would have cost Natalie the win in SJDS I think he just votes Nat.
@@BrettMKW I'll tell you something, if Tony wasn't there then Michele wins, there was zero path for Natalie to win this, she may have gotten Boston Rob's & Amber's vote, but that's it
Also Jeremy's was against Tony, if Tony was their then Michele gets his vote, so would of been 5 for Natalie, the rest to Michele
tony be like "thank you Woo.."
"I will see you back in Los Angeles for the reading of the votes"
more like
"I will see you on a zoom in my garage soon"
Michele didn’t win but she is now the only person in winners at war who hasn’t had her torch snuffed
I noticed that too! She is the only person to play survivor more than once and never get voted out. I thought that was pretty cool.
@@tmm4195 Michael Skupin, Jenna Morasca, and Colton Cumbie played twice and never had their torches snuffed.
@@sudokujohn I’m not counting anyone who had to be medically evacuated or in colton’s case just straight up quit. Colton basically got his torch snuffed without actually getting it snuffed. Michelle is the only one to make it to final tribal council every time she played and won once. Jenna had potential, but unfortunately I can’t count her since she had to leave the game early during all-stars.
It's because she actually a nice person in the game and in real life!
She more than got what she needed out of the season without winning. She really struggled with the backlash her win got and making it to the end of an all winners season is incredibly impressive no matter how you do it. She didn’t need redemption in my eyes but she got it regardless.
Boston Rob’s vote was a work of pure art
"I'll see you in Los Angeles" . . . So he thought
Boston Robs Confessional was badass
I’m really surprised that Natalie got 4 votes and Michelle got none. Michelle was really strong socially and was constantly on the bottom. I feel like Chris Underwood did the least you would need to do to win coming from eoe, and Natalie had it much easier and didn’t really do anything monumental like Chris. Of course, Tony deserved to win by far, but at least one or two votes should’ve gone to Michelle.
The jury wanted to split the vote to give Michele 2nd over Natalie. But they realized this could jeopardize Tony’s win and accidentally hand it to Natalie so they decided against this.
4 or 5 people were on the brink of voting for Michele but switched to Tony because they were afraid of a split vote giving Nat the win. Everyone universally agrees Michele should have been the runner-up.
A handful of Michelle's closest allies wanted to vote for her (Wendell, Adam, Nick, maybe Ben) but they were afraid that if they did, they would throw their votes away, and inadvertently give the win to Natalie. They really did not want Natalie to win because of Edge, so they instead voted for Tony to ensure he wins and not the edge returnee.
Yul and Danni wanted to vote for Michele as well. Michele could have easily bagged 6 votes if this stupid Edge returned in a Final 3 didn’t happen.
16 people on jury. 4- Natalie. 4-6 votes on Michelle, means 6-8 votes on Tony. It could have been possible for a 6-6-4 vote (tie between Michelle and Tony) and Natalie becomes 17th juror, where it's likely she votes for Michelle. Seriously jury could have placed 5 votes on Michelle to still give Tony the win.
michele should have got at least 1 vote
Blake white when Nick was talking about being on the outs I thought he was gonna give Michelle a vote
Masonic the destructor. yes same!!!! how was tony on the outs though..... he knew all he had to do was make it to final 3 and he won
i think he was talking about michele in that moment but there was probably more to the confessional they didn’t show. kind of like a “i know it’s hard to be on the outs the whole time... but unfortunately tony just played a better game” kinda thing
I believe I heard several wanted to vote for Michele but they were worried if they split the votes Natalie might win
Zelda Fan my brother said that i was like UGHHH but there was how many jury members 16!! they should have figured out something.
This vote is so ICONIC
I know Natalie didn't know the outcome of Island of the Idols at the time she played WaW, but her costly decision to not make fire at final 4 against Tony makes Chris Underwood's game winning decision look more impressive. If only Natalie had used Chris's playbook!
She still wouldn't of won, she had 10 to 12 votes against her no matter what she did, only Boston Rob & Amber would of switched
@@WTC-1990 So if Tony hadn't won fire, who would've won?
@@xxladyofrokkxx3133 in my opinion it would of been Sarah cause she had stronger relationships, alot of them have said they didn't trust Tony and it was sarah that brought them in like Ben
But let's say Michelle was told to make fire and beat Tony then she may have won cause that would if impressed the Jury, there was no path for Natalie to win this season, the 4 she got was the only 4 she was getting, Tony was the only one that could sweep the all 12 tho
@@WTC-1990 True. There was a strong anti EoE sentiment from majority of the cast. I mean if Natalie was able to somehow take out Tony, Sarah and Ben and go to the end with Denise and Michelle I think she would've had more of a chance but she was never winning against Tony, Sarah or even Ben.
@@bomberdawesome I don't believe she beats them either, it was set in stone thst the others didn't like her
God damn this was awesome idk why but it just was
Tony the survivor goat
all thanks to Woo..
@@dayaopao7054 by that logic, you can say parv’s win was all thanks to amanda.
@@lrosemary7884 i mean yeah kind of that vote was close despite amanda blowing it hard at ftc
People are questioning Parvati's vote. It's not just that her and Natalie had a very close bond, but she couldn't form any kind of personal analysis of Tony because she never played with him. Danni, Amber, Ethan and Rob couldn't either. If Natalie has made stronger connections with some of the other jury members on the Edge, I still don't think she would beat Tony, but I guarantee she would have gotten more votes and would have been closer, which is actually scary. If Tony didn't play as great of a game or had been replaced with someone like Denise or Ben, Natalie would have had an actual chance of winning the season depending on how the votes being split would have gone between her and Michelle. It's not a jury flaw, it's a flaw that was set up by the game and the concept of the Edge.
amber is so gorgeous even to this day. rob is so lucky
I will never understand how Natalie, arguably one of the most impressive winners in the show’s history, especially in the modern age, could have had such an overinflated view of her game. It’s bad enough that she felt she was in a good spot to win despite how little she impacted the game, but for her to also think she had a shot against Tony, who ran so much of the season, is baffling to me! Even if I think her final tribal performance was pretty impressive, how could she have possibly thought she was likely to win? It just makes her bitter reaction all the more frustrating 🤦🏻♂️
Same with Cassidy from 43
@@KristianYeagerCassidy wasn’t voted out first on her season
greatest confessional (ish) ever
At first it looked like they were voting in order of seniority, but that fell apart pretty early.
Tyson is so crazy
Sandra is still the true queen …. She just left all winners to do her own things … she knows herself well and I can appreciate that
I agree. She knew she couldn't make it back in the game so why suffer on E.O.E? Would have been cool to finally see her on jury though
Sandra got dethroned all the way back in game changers. She wasn’t deserving of the “queen” title anyway. Parvati is.
@@johnjoseph6874 Sandra played a great game on GCs, ESPECIALLY for a known two-time winner. She deserves her status 100% and proved it every time she played
@@gideong8627 She doesn’t deserve her win in heroes vs villains. She did nothing in that season except kiss up to the heroes. And the only reason she won was because of a bitter jury. That’s pretty much the only reason. Parvati should’ve won.
@@johnjoseph6874 jury management is a thing which she did very well, parv and russ pissed off a lot of the jury… Sandra did deserve her win
Michelle be like 😢
Me be like 😢
Originally I went with saying Natalie but after watching this again for sure Tony
How did she play perfect she came back like 5 days before finale no??
She didn't even play that well when she came back. Coming into the game with an immunity idol and information from the jury are very powerful weapons and she STILL blew it
@@B-Mag exactly I wish they had listened to Tony when he said she has an idol and they ended up having to had use theirs. Rob was right she should have taken him out and not let Sara try
@@B-Mag yea it was hardly fair..
@@B-Mag she didn't blow it lmao
@@Zac-oz9lj you wanna elaborate or nah?
The song?
The only winner who plays twice and never gets her torch snuffed queen michelle she deesserved second place ✨
Michelle deserved some votes. She managed to survive the entire game.
But compare to the other two her resume in this game is not that good
@@thenameless7810 I think Michelle’s resume is better than Natalie’s tbh
Adam, Nick, Wendell, Yul, and Danni apparently agree with you - they were voting for Tony specifically because they thought Natalie might have won. :/ Apparently someone else wanted to vote for Michele but they of course decided to vote for Tony because they all agreed to vote against the Edge returning player on principle. :/
@@tmm4195 But were you on the Island with the other winners to decide that?
@@yourlocalramen1660 Obviously not. I said I think meaning that’s my opinion from watching the game from what they showed us. A few of the winners who were actually on the season felt the same way so I’m not alone.
I think it's interesting Parvati voted Natalie over Tony knowing that she would've in Cagayan
In the final of Cagayan she showed up and Jeff asked her who she would've voted for and she said she loved Woo but would've voted for Tony
It's not like natalie is a bad player either but like geez her vote could've at least gone to michelle
@exa which interview?
@@caidenmagill1006 This just proves that the online community really doesn’t understand Survivor. It’s about getting people to like you. Parvati and Tyson simply liked Natalie the most and gave her votes because of that. It’s really that simple.
@@yourlocalramen1660 I understand the game mate😂, But like some people don't always vote on who they like more, Also she Tony played a 10× better game in WAW than Cagayan.
0:45 who else never thought they'd see this? Boston Rob basically out Kaysared Kaysar and needed 7 reality shows to sit on the jury (hey even AR eliminated super early or in final episode right?) edit: I don't remember the placements but on this one if jury was standard would he have made the jury here? edit again: 5th out so yea wouldn't have made that one either
I love seeing my favorite players (Tyson & Parv) playing, but I hate seeing them voting. Such a disappointment 😢
The Edge is both good and bad. Good, because we get to see all of the players, but bad because it skews the votes against people who stay in the game. Ethan and Parvati never played with Tony and spent a long time on the Edge with Natalie. Then Tyson was voted out twice by Tony and was never on the same team as Michelle until the merge, where he was quickly voted out. Finally, Jeremy wasn't going to vote for anyone but Natalie due to their previous game together and close friendship. Sorry to all Michelle fans, but she was probably never going to get any votes, due to others knowing how these 4 would vote and not wanting to give runner up votes in fear of messing everything up. Think the Aaron Gordon Dunk Contests, where the judges want the contest to keep on going rather than announce the clear winner, and the lack of communication messing everything up.
I understand why Michelle didn’t get a single vote, but dang she’s the only contestant this season to have never been voted
Why did Tyson call tony goat on his vote parchment?
Probably meant goat as in Greatest Of All Time
@@sociallyawkwardpotato8105 yea
Tyson didn’t even vote Tony
@@brokenpikachu9491 exactly
@@brokenpikachu9491 yea but the only reason he didn’t wS because he made a deal to do so with natalie
Notably missing:
Sandra. Who QUIT!
I am still pissed that Michele did get no votes. She played a great game, she assessed the situation correctly but unfortunately for her, the others were not looking for winning. She should have been second (first imho but Tony also played a great game so kudos)
nick, wendell and i think someone else wanted to vote for michelle but were scared that natalie would win so they ended up voting for tony to ensure his win
@@yoshimoto23 nick Wendell Adam and Danni
She deserved second maybe but definitely not first; Tony played a way better game
yul
Damnit
Michele should’ve gotten a vote!
She would have, from all the post game interviews most people thought she deserved 2nd place, but were afraid Natalie could win if some were switching their vote from Tony to Michele
some clowns actually voted natalie , michelle was 10 x better and tony 100 x
I think it was inevitable that Jeremy would vote for her but oh well. Tony still had the best game
@MilwaukeeMandrill HAHA nice conspiracy man
It's about more than just gameplay. Tyson said in an interview that he never felt like he knew Tony, so he voted Natalie. Just because you disagree doesn't make them clowns, you immature, pointless fossil
I expected 9-4-3
9 to tony 4 for Michelle
3 for Natalie
@@shawnhoelscher1440 Tyson had to repay her for the Idol she gave him, its Ethan and especially Parvati(in her OG season being screwed by theme/twist), being old school you would expect them to respect the integrity of the game and vote for the ones that went 39 days, rather than skip 3/4 of the game after being voted out first.
I don’t understand why so many people think that giving up individual immunity to go to fire is an impressive move. It’s a 50-50 shot you go home. Also, didn’t Rob give Elizabeth in Island of the Idols shit for wanting to compete in fire? How is this any different?
This is different because she lost to Tony, and if she wanted to get him out, she should’ve taken it into her own hands. Also, it’s not a 50-50 shot if you’re better at fire than the other person
It’s impressive because you’re giving up guaranteed immunity to ensure that the big threat goes home by taking them out yourself. It’s a risk by putting your game on the line to get some credibility going into the FTC. It’s why Dom considered doing that to Wendell in Ghost Island and why Chris actually did that to Devens and won the game. It’s definitely good for the Edger to do it, especially if they got voted out pre-merge and only returned at the very end, as they have basically nothing to show for their game.
We all know Tony would win regardless of who he sits next to or if there’s a final two. However, let’s just say there is a final 2 and Michele or Natalie wins immunity and either one of them voted out Tony. Now it’s a final 2 between Michele and Natalie who would win?
Let's see...17 votes, 9 to win.
Nat gets 4 by default since Ethan, Parvati, Tyson, and Jeremy voted her even with Tony in the game.
Michele likely gets Tony, Wendell, Nick, Ben, Adam, a good chunk of these people wanted to vote Michele to try and give her second place over Natalie but didn't want to risk Tony losing as a result. I know Ben in particular was very adamant that once your torch is snuffed it's snuffed. Sarah also probably goes Michele.
Nat probably gets Rob based on what he said in this voting confessional, Sophie, Denise based on what they said in their jury speaks videos.
Amber, Danni, Yul, Kim I guess are toss ups, and I can't remember what they said in their jury speaks videos. But assuming Michele gets the six names I mentioned, she'd need three of these four to win. I think she'd have a hard time getting Amber/Danni given that they saw all of Nat's game and virtually none of Michele's, and what they could gather from Michele was that she had no agency in the game.
I'd say Nat wins. It's probably even better for her if Ben is in F3 instead of just being in an F2 with Michele, since Ben would be a lock for Michele if he's on the jury.
Danni mentioned post game interview that her, Wendell, adam, and nick would’ve voted for Michele to take 2nd place but they heard that some people were voting for Natalie and they got worried if Natalie would’ve won by accident over Tony, which is why they voted for Tony. Also Danni mentioned but on her ig live but Natalie and Yul did not get along at all to a point Natalie got into Yul’s face and so I don’t think he would’ve voted Natalie at that point.
Also it’s 16 jurors since Sandra left edge of extinction
@@alexgalvez7861 In an F2 it would be 17 votes. It was 16 with the current F3 format (everyone besides Michelle, Tony, Natalie, Sandra.) I'm still fairly sure Amber votes whichever way Rob votes, and Rob was willing to vote Natalie had she not been there with Tony. I didn't know that about Danni tho.
Michele (6): Nick, Adam, Yul, Danni, Ben, Wendell
Natalie (5): Ethan, Tyson, Jeremy, Parvati, Rob
Lean Michele: Tony, Sarah
Lean Natalie: Amber, Sophie, Denise
Unsure: Kim
I think Kim would actually be the tiebreaker.
Michele. Since she was never voted out previously in the season. Fuck extinction island. And fuck fire tokens.
Michelle still is the true winner in my heart.
Why tho? She didn’t deserve the win. She def deserved second above Nat though
But no one else’s
Everyone looked at her as an undeserving winner but even the past winners like Ben applauded the way she played WAW. She may not be flashy like Tony but she mastered the under the radar gameplay and the social gameplay. Also when her back is against the wall she wins the challenges she needs to . I don't get the whole she's not a threat or goat argument. I will however say that she mishandles some of her alliances like the Nick/Wendel ones and threw them under the bus when she felt that she was being targeted.
@@hommefataltaemin I'll give you that at least. She just wasn't as flashy as Tony was. She was more behind the scenes cutthroat. They purposely kept her out of almost all the votes because in their minds she's an easy goat to take .But her and Jeremy had controll after Natalie was voted out and she automatically went with Natalie after she came back in hoping she and her would crush the Tonys group. But that's where Natalie messed up with the final 4 fire . Also it was always the Tony group going to the final 3/4 but Michelle and Natalie won immunity when they were on the chopping block
@@the_fd_180 You just admitted that Tony is better. 😆
you should pretty much never give up immunity at final 4... UNLESS you come from EoE. fatal flaw by natalie. still would have been tough against sarah for sure but taking out tony would have been huge as the jury clearly saw him as the biggest threat/winner. i think alot of them would've thrown votes at her even though she made enemies on the edge. if you lose in fire, you were the first person voted out anyways lol. that's my take. can't play so few days and think you've won it unless you make the big move like chris
For every enemy she also bonded with the jury and skipped 3/4 of the game, This is without a doubt the most unfair theme/twist in Survivor. She got Ethan, Parvati and Tyson's votes just from being with them on the edge. Hell, if there were not a lot of people on the Jury that respect the integrity of the game, a lot more would vote for her, just because they didn't play much with Tony, but luckily they recognized that Edge of Extinction sucks and the players that went all 39 days should get the prize.
I get why it had to be there in this season, to get more screen time with everyone's favorites, because for Old School fans the boot order was brutal, but I hope EoE never comes back again.
Natalie smh
Michelle smh
I feel sorry for Michelle... she played hard.
I was expecting Parvati being old school and being burned by stupid twists to respect more the game of Survivor and voting for Tony, or Michelle for going 39 days and not for the edger.
if it was natalie michele and sarah who would have won?
Blake White I think Sarah would win
Fenway Kid i mean idk. i just don’t think she played the best game. i feel like it would be between natalie and michele , sarah would ofc have tony and bens vote!
I think if the 3 girls were at the final and Michele had good convincing she could sweep the votes and win.
Fenway Kid yeah
@@fenwaykid757 @Fenway Kid I read in survivor reddit that Wendel, Nick and some others wanted to vote for Michele to give her 2nd but heard that alot of people in the edge were voting for Natalie. They got spooked because they didnt want Tony to lose in a 3 way tie, so they all voted Tony. Sarah wasn't that revered in the jury though, i think Michele can win in a close vote if its the 3 girls in the Finals.
0:21 when she caught rob messaging another girl
I am suprised they let he back like 5 days before game ended that’s not that fair oh well she didn’t win
@@nasierbrown8974 Thats exactly rhe point. Fuck edge of extinction. And fuck fire tokens.
Wasn't fair at all, 5 days before the end is ridiculous
I think Michele should’ve won or had at least a few votes, but congrats to Tony.
Not a chance lmao
@@dbliss741 Why not? What did she do wrong?
@@emmawebsdale6363 Tony simply played the best game. He would have won no matter who was up against him. He had a great ftc speech. Michele was constantly on the outs, wasn’t apart of votes, and was honeslty dragged along because she was easy to win against. She did okay a good game, but saying she should’ve won is just absurd.
@@jimin7997 She didn’t deserve the win over Tony. No one did, but she was a more deserving runner up than natalie for sure
The jury didn't want Natalie to win so they all collectively voted for Tony cause they knew Natalie had 4 votes locked up
I wanted Natalie to win so bad, but Tony played one hell of a game.
Making it to the end is still pretty good if you wanted them to win, I wanted Ryan to win HHH and he made it to the end
Parviti smh
The only‘s season where everycast away votes for a winner
They also do that in Edge of Extinction
Minus Sandra
It also happened in Season 33 btw
@@phoenixav9550it didn't
Another reason to love Parv: She wanted Natalie to win
Parvati is a trash tier winner.
That’s not a reason to love Parv. Tony controlled that game
@@littleratfella6857 and youre a trash tier person, now what?
I do like Parv a lot but this is such a shit reason. She wasn’t voting who deserved it she just voted who she liked more which I think is pathetic. Michelle deserved second place, Tony first. If u are looking at it from a logical standpoint.
@@hommefataltaemin Social game is part of Survivor. If Natalie came off as more likable to Parv, and that's what she valued, then it's a valid reason.
Everyone who voted Natalie are the best
Michelle didn't deserve 0 votes
rob wouldn't give up his immunity and put himself on the block , nobody would do that but he aspects Natalie to give her immunity after she won against tony and others. rob was unfair towards Natalie.
Chris Underwood of EOE would like to have a word with u please.
Boston Rob would absolutely put himself on the chopping block. He’s played enough times to understand what the jury respects. He also had that balls to the walls ruthlessness that would lead him to make such a decision
I definitely think he would put himself in that position. He wasn’t unfair towards natalie, he just thought Tony played a stronger game, which he definitely did. He told Natalie she had to play perfectly to get his vote and she didn’t
Anyone in her situation absolutely should of taken on Tony in fire, Tony was the ultimate threat to win, he played the strongest game and was well liked, you can't allow a guy like that to get on the jury under any circumstances
Boston Rob was just stating the obvious, if I'm her, I'm going to fire
Xander in the newer seasons proved this rule true when he didn't go to fire to take out the biggest threat
Nat played the best game, tony just crazy
Sarona Sosoatu no way. Natalie got voted out first lol. Arguably she played the worst game of the season. Tony played the best winning game in survivor history
@@matta6395 Tony is literally the Goat, he didn't get a single vote in the most stacked survivor game in history. And Natalie got voted out first, shouldn't have even been close
Natalie literally got voted out first, you moron. Tony dominated from start to finish.
Tony Vlachos is the best and ultimate G.O.A.T in survivor history he's the main character of this season Natalie is just the villain of the season
Natalie: voted out first, 11 votes against, 2 immunities , no blindsides organized (except maybe Ben)
Tony: Never voted out, 0 votes against, 4 immunities, organized the major blindsides
This random person: "Natalie deserved to win." Logic at its finest.