Carl Andre: Sculpture as Place. Retrospective at Dia Beacon
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 07. 2024
- Carl Andre: Sculpture as Place, 1958--2010 at Dia Beacon is the first retrospective to consider the full spectrum of Carl Andre's art. The exhibition is grouped into three parts: sculpture, poetry, and Carl Andre's unclassifiable productions, from the enigmatic assemblages known as Dada Forgeries to his wide-ranging ephemera. In this video, Yasmil Raymond (Curator, Dia Art Foundation) provides us with an introduction to the exhibition and Carl Andre's work.
Carl Andre: Sculpture as Place, 1958--2010 at Dia Art Foundation in Beacon spans over five decades. The retrospective includes 45 sculptures; over 160 poems and works on paper presented in wooden vitrines designed by the artist; a selection of rarely exhibited assemblages known as Dada Forgeries; and an unprecedented selection of photographs and ephemera. It's the first museum survey of Andre's entire oeuvre, and the first retrospective in North America since 1978-80.
After premiering at Dia:Beacon, the retrospective's only venue in the United States, it will travel to museums in Europe, including Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid (May 7 -- October 12, 2015); Hamburger Bahnhof, Museum für Gegenwart, Berlin (May 7 -- September 25, 2016); and Musée d'Art moderne de la Ville de Paris (October 20, 2016 -- February 12, 2017). At Dia Beacon, the exhibition runs until March 2, 2015.
Carl Andre: Sculpture as Place, 1958--2010 / Retrospective at Dia Beacon. Introduction by Yasmil Raymond (Curator, Dia Art Foundation). Beacon (NY), May 1, 2014.
More videos on contemporary art, design, architecture:
www.vernissage.tv
Connect:
/ vernissagetv
/ vernissagetv
Become a Member:
vernissage.tv/blog/members/
Browse our Archive:
vernissage.tv/blog/archive/
Find Artists, Designers, Architects:
vernissage.tv/blog/archive/art...
Art TV pioneer Vernissage TV provides you with an authentic insight into the world of contemporary fine arts, design and architecture. With its two main series "No Comment" and "Interviews", art tv channel VernissageTV attends opening receptions of exhibitions worldwide, interviews artists, designers, architects. VTV provides art lovers with news, reports and features from the international art scene. VernissageTV: the window to the art world. Das Fenster zur Kunstwelt. La fenêtre sur le monde de l'art. A janela para o mundo da arte. La ventana al mundo del arte. نافذة على عالم الفن. 到艺术世界的窗口。Окно в мир искусства. Since 2005.
Where is Ana Mendieta?
wow did he throw them out the window too?
Wah, apart from Carl's genius, isn't this curator/speaker so clear and equipped with good content? Love this
Beautiful show, the presenter is amazing , her talk is a concise highly intelligent review of his work , focuses on the multiple meaning of his work.
she really is excellent
She is awesome and he doesn’t deserve her intelligence.
@@JacksonPolypI BELIEVE THAT CARL ANDRE IS AN EVIL. MURDERER WHO THOUGHT HE GOT AWAY WITH IT. I WAS NOT EVEN AN ADULT WHEN I BELIEVE HE MURDERED HIS WIFE, AND WAS SET FREE BY A CROOKED EVIL JUDGE. I CAN FEEL HIS SOUL IS IN HELL. I DON'T TAKE THIS LIGHTLY BECAUSE I AM A CHRISTIAN. BUT, I FEEL HE HAS GONE TO HELL. FOR BEING EVIL, CRUEL, AND A LIAR. NO WICKED EVIL HUMANS WILL EVER FOOL ALMIGHTY GOD. PEOPLE DON'T GET THAT. THEY THINK THAT IF THEY CAN FOOL STUPID FOOLS, THEN THEY ARE IN THE CLEAR. NO!! YOU STILL ANSWER TO GOD ALMIGHTY. CARL ANDRE IS IN HELL. I CAN SENSE HIS SOUL IN TORMENT RIGHT NOW. IT IS AWFUL. HE SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN SO STUPID. HE HAD MANY YEARS TO COME FORTH AND TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT HE HAD DONE. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FAR BETTER TO PAY FOR HIS EVIL ON EARTH AND ADMIT HE DID IT AND THEN TO HAVE REPENTED OVER AND OVER AGAIN. THE SINCERITY IN HIS SOUL WOULD HAVE WASHED HIM CLEAN. NOW HE IS PAYING FOR IT IN THE AFTERLIFE. FOR EVER. NO FRIENDS OR BUDDIES CAN BAIL HIM OUT. HE'S ALONE FOREVER AND STUCK. EVERYTIME A NEW PERSON HEARS OF WHAT HE DID, THEIR HEARTS WILL CONDEMN HIM AS EVIL. AND I BELIEVE THE JUDGE WILL BURN IN HELL TOO FOR HIS PART IN HELPING THIS EVIL ACT. MANY JUDGES WILL GO TO HELL FOR EITHER KNOWINGLY FALSELY IMPRISONING PEOPLE OR KNOWINGLY SETTING EVIL NARCISSISTIC MURDERERS FREE. ALMIGHTY GOD IS NOT PLAYING WITH THESE STUPID, ARROGANT, FOOLS.
Wheres ana
Love her explanation of the work, I like it even more now.
Yasmil Raymond rocks!!! Brilliant and talented curator!!
Always nice to visit Dia, and if it is with Carl Andre work, much better. Thank you Dia for this exhibition.
Carl Andre Retrospective at Dia Art Foundation in Beacon (NY). #Beacon #Minimalism #sculpture #carlandre #retrospective #exhibition #art
Thanks for helping me do my research project!
+Wilson Gin thank you, I'm happy the video is helpful.
Andre' 's art doesn't move me.
Well, he doesn't move anymore either. RIP.
wo ist Ana?
Within brownish stain on a sidewalk in N.Y.C
Perhaps they should be seen in urban spaces to really complete the picture. Then they could be abused and stolen. Now that would be a context. Note how fabulous they look in such an aesthetically perfect environment. A room of carefully placed junk from a Dollar Store would be great to look at here. It could be placed by art curators familiar with Carl's aesthetic. Thus no need for an artist at all. Really minimal.
who is the person who speaks so well?
Descansa en paz viejito flojo
she goes off the trails on the subject of the "encounter" with industrial prefabricated unites and the factory "worker." Andre's Minimalism defies verbal explanation, so she feels obligated to fluff it up with some proletariat angling.
He died 2024. And his important friend, Frank Stella died 2024, too.😢
They shared a studio when they began their careers. Their early works may need to be re-examined in terms of collaborative exploration. It is an important epoch in art history, the birth of minimal art. Just as Georges Braque and Picasso were engaged in a joint exploration of cubism.
Thank you for your remarks.
extra-ordinary
Did Carl really kill his girlfriend, throwing her out a window?
Nah he was tried for it and was acquitted because of reasonable doubt. meaning that its doubtful that he did. People are just being reactionary because its en vogue to be reactionary
It was his wife. Ana Mendieta. Brilliant artist.
The transcript from the police investigation is available if you research it. You will see that there were way too many unanswered questions about that fateful night.
@@cohencohen54 Read Naked By The Window if you have any doubt
@@Millylerks Nah, he killed her. Scratched on his body and her inability to even place her self in a position to jump out that window, coupled with her fear of heights. He did it.
Ana Mendieta was a much better artist.
This is a great example of people buying into a brand(person), and not seeing it for what it truly is... I hate to be the villain in all of this but it's just simply the way it is. Art is very subjective to the individual but when you take a plain tile floor and say that some famous artist bought the prefabbed material and simply set it on the floor, does that truly make it art? In my opinion of course not, that's ridiculous to even consider. It's a tile floor that looks like a tile floor, bought from a tile manufacture. Where is the art or sculpture or creative thinking? You are literally building a tile floor, or buying a wooden block and placing it on the floor, or a round ball.... I understand everyone is going to voice their opinion on that, but where do you draw the line on art vs someone manipulating an audience that puts trust in you and will believe and listen to what you do and say. Cmon now?
What if the artist became famous with this tile on the floor, then is it buying into a brand? The bran of this artist is defined by tiles on the floor as funny as it sounds. I completely understand your frustration but i think that what artists do is manipulate your perception and since there is no actual definition of art i think that what is art is subjective to what you believe art to be. This to me means that if i perceive tiles on the floor to be art then they are... to me. To you they are not and that is fine. As you said it is subjective to the individual
@@yanagoncheva4416 Fair enough. I just think art should be created by the artist, not bought and placed on a display for it's intended use, in it's exact same form, only to be reclaimed by an artist for it to now be considered his "art".
Okay just re-watched some of the vid. Had to revisit it b/c it's been a year lol. This is more about the artist selling people the story behind why the artist chose a particular item to be placed in a particular spot or corner in a room. It's more about a story rather than the item itself. Basically the story is the art, not the piece itself. The item/art itself was already created by someone else. His "art" is more about the story he is trying to portray after placing the item in a certain way on the floor. He's a "story artist" if you want to call it that lol. His goal is to get people to think and to use their own imaginations, that's why he is so heavily focused on being simplistic. It makes the viewer focus heavily on the storyline rather than a simplistic wood block that was created by someone else. Him fabricating his own items would ultimately take away from what he is trying to achieve. You are forced to use your imagination no matter what, sense he didn't actually create the items. Whatever that form of art would be called, not sure but I'll just call it "story art".
Enigmatic assemblage...it's just a pile of bricks, housed in a special place (Gallery), how can anyone take this person seriously.
Because it makes you think? makes you question what is culture and what is art? if you ever need an entry point into any artwork think about what it is and why it is.
Идиотизм успешно шагает по планете.
I will never understand art...
Sculptor of what ?is he still in jail?artist that killed other artist do not deserve a show retrospective 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎👎
I don't know if he killed her or not. This is what Wikipedia says about it: "Andre was charged with second degree murder. He elected to be tried before a judge with no jury. In 1988 Andre was acquitted of all charges related to Mendieta's death.” (Wikipedia, 20 May 2020, at 00:36 (UTC))
Acquitted....besides art is beyond morality.....silly child.
And for those talking bad about Carl Andre, people as intelligent as Carl Andre could go crazy and do dangerous things.
I believe people are just hating and trying to defame people of grandeur.
He can rot
murderer
...In 1988, he was acquitted of all charges related to Mendieta's death... (source: Wikipedia)
Booooooo