In the beginning He was with God. Through Him all things were made; without Him nothing was made that was ever made (John 1 2:4) I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.(Jesus speaking)(Revelation 22:13)
The entire book of revelation is organized in a chiasm and helps to know this when reading this book. This is something I just recently learned and I think it is absolutely amazing and could only be a design of God.
Yes, when I first learned about chiastic structures, I looked into it for more research. I discovered that every narrative book of the bible is structured this way. And you can gleam so much more knowledge when you connect the step with its corresponding step on the other side. I first discovered it when reading Noah's story, where it is very clear with the numbers. Then researching more I found that Genesis has several chiastic structures in each storyline that is bracketed inside of a chiastic structure of the whole book. It is really amazing and quite complex. When you look into it more, this explains why the Gospel of John was written in the way it was. The cleansing of the temple begins his gospel, while Jesus' body is cleansed near the end. (because of course his body becomes the new temple) There are lots more amazing steps just like that. If you are really interested in this, then pick your favorite book, if yours is Revelation then great. Then do some line by line research and find the steps in every structure. I know it is in Revelation but have not done it thoroughly there. I love to study the structure of the bible, there is something else that is even bigger that I am researching about the structure. But that is time consuming and won't be ready for some time. For now, I just do these connections and parallels. God is truly amazing, and there is so much more to unlock and reveal upon more study. I hope you keep at it my friend, God Bless
In regards to what you said about “God not creating the darkness” “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.” Isaiah 45:7 KJV
Compare Genesis 1 and compare this verse and what God is saying. It's not that He created darkness, but when God formed the light that made you realize there was darkness in contrast.
This is a great verse to demonstrate why I don't prefer the KJV. It's confusing! See here: God cannot "create evil", since He is Holy. People that hate God will take a verse like that and run for days with it! God baffles and confuses the wicked; He manifests miracles no one expects; He causes calamity to befall those not in His will... But He doesn't "create evil". The KJV was a fine translation 400+ years ago. It was written at about the same time William Shakespeare was writing plays! I can't understand a single one of his plays without constantly referencing the footnotes or dictionary. The language has changed that much. So many words have become obsolete or are archaic. Add to that that the fact that phrases in one language do not always translate well into another. I prefer the NASB. It takes most of the legwork out of reading the Word without gutting the scriptures of their power. I believe the only right way to get the full meaning of what's written is to understand it in the context of the time and original language. With all that said, the most useful reference materials I have are my King James and may Strongs Exhaustive Concordance. For the life of me, I can't memorize all the scriptures I would like to, but I can look up phrases in the concordance. What's practical about that is that the KJV uses the same word frequently enough to make finding it easy. The KJV hasn't changed for a long time.
@@wbshappy1 Do you have an explanation for these verses? Isn’t Yahweh (God) the creator of ALL? “Now it came about on the next day that an evil spirit FROM God came mightily upon Saul, and he raved in the midst of the house, while David was playing the harp with his hand, as usual; and a spear was in Saul’s hand.” 1 Samuel 18:10 NASB1995 “Now it came about on the next day that an evil spirit FROM God rushed upon Saul, and he raved in the midst of the house while David was playing the harp with his hand, as usual; and a spear was in Saul’s hand.” 1 Samuel 18:10 NASB2020
I think I can explain it. it was the condemnation of the lord for Saul rejecting God's leadership. When the Lord withdrew his anointing from Saul for his arrogance, and gave it to David, Saul was jealous. it just happened to coincide with David's being in Saul's presence, so that Saul could try to kill David.twice. You'll recall that David was a very different sort from Saul. Saul's daughter mocked David for dancing with the peasants at the return of the Ark. (ref: Michal; 2 Samuel 6.16-23) What we see is the difference between an unspiritual, fleshly, carnal king and a worshipper, although imperfect, of God. But I ASSUME You're actually talking about the term, ""From" God. Here's a thought for you. Saul, like Pharaoh whose heart was "hardened" by Yahweh, had turned antagonistic to Yahweh. The thought of Him and not being able to have all the glory for himself was intolerable. In Pharaoh eyes, God had defeated all the gods of Egypt (including pharaoh himself who was thought of as a deity) through Moses. Saul's HUGE problem was rebellion and insubordination to Yahweh.In 1 Sam 15.17 God rebukes Saul through the Prophet for not remaining "small in his own eyes..." Too I submit that neither Saul nor Pharaoh really knew Yahweh. There's even a couple times where Saul refers to Yahweh as "your God"--not his own. The was just no room in Saul's heart for anyone but Saul. Does this answer your question?@@c.c_mac
Very good. Day 3 is a parable as all the other “days”. You look for parallels, yes? Light is righteousness. Darkness is not. There is a great divide spiritually between Light and Darkness. There’s a few applications for light (stars, fixed stars/planets, sun and moon) in heavens and light in heavens as spiritual Light (Lord of hosts/angels), which are His servants (Gabriel, Michael etc). There is also physical stars Jeremiah 10:2, Psalm 19:1-2, Amos 5:8-9. El [LORD] is Light and in Him there’s no darkness (1st John 1:5). Isaiah 45:7, “I create the Light and make the darkness…”
Ok watched David and Absolom, I can add two more comparisons. "Not one hair of his head would fall to the earth" and "they will break none of his bones". Both are expressions of preserving some aspect of their bodies despite experiencing violent deaths. Also Christ's heart was pierced by a lance as Absolom was. Theres another thought that just came to me, but I have to study it further. Fantastic study.
Thanks for your well thought out response. You may very well be correct about a physical mark I also believe it highly probable but simply for salvation sake it doesnt matter if we take a mark that we shouldn't, we are lost, or if we participate in sinful behavior we will be lost. Lost is lost. Do you know what a chiasm is? I am also interested in scriptural discoveries I have discovered a few of my own would love to share some with you.
I think it will matter if we take the mark, it's humanity's second chance with food. And Revelation says of you take it, you won't make it. You might have a point, that the people who take it, weren't going to make it anyway. I believe in life after death, so like Abraham have faith in God and won;t take the mark no matter what. Even if my loved ones die before me. Yes, have heard about chiasms. Love to hear your thoughts.
OK I suspected these structures could be found elsewhere just haven't taken the time to research that yet. I will share with you one of my recent discoveries that I found fascinating and that is the four, "I will" statements that are found in Exodus 6; 6-7 that are the format Jewish Passover meal are found in the exact reverse order in Psalm 30(31); 1-5 (Free, Deliver, Rescue, Take in Ex and then Take, Rescue, Deliver, Free in Psalm 30(31). David's prayer mirrors what God promised to Moses in Exodus. Like two hands in prayer meeting together. verse 6
@@socratesfriend745 Yes, good one. Check out my video about David and his rebellious son Absalom. David retraced the steps of his son exactly in reverse. I do believe there is much deeper meaning about these things happening in reverse order. Not only if you look at the world today and compare it to early Genesis, there seems to be an unraveling of God's creation. Like we are going in reverse order of His creation. I think this is what God was hinting at. And end times of Revelation will be much like the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11. Yes, I see symbolic replays happening in the world again and again. That is what these parallels are about and how God was going to warn us of the dangers ahead. Thanks for that example you cited. God Bless
There is a Rabbinic theory out there that there was a world before this one. But that world did not please God, for reasons only He would know. The Rabbis explored this theory further that maybe in the other world, the first humans did not disobey God by eating of the fruit from the forbidden tree. Maybe God wanted us to be broken and be able to find obedience through our struggles to be able to be reunited with God again. That's their theory, but an interesting exercise based on the text. I don't know if I can buy into their theory that God wanted a broken relationship with mankind. Just doesn't seem like a logical theory. We know that God created everything, so He would have had to have created waters. But why does Genesis 1:2 say that the Spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters before there was anything? I think it was written this way for the reasons cited in this video. God wanted the things created to be listed and the fruit tree to be the 6th thing created. If you study Genesis 2 and compare it to Genesis 1, things don't seem to be in the same order. I think because Genesis 1 was written to be just a list of things, but the narration starting in Genesis 2 and 3, are the actual order of things. I am not a strict literalist, I give God leeway to create and fulfill things His way, and I won't try to constrain Him by my understanding of the scriptures. I hope I explained my theory well.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 thank you for your explanation. Genesis 1:1 (KJV)said that "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth". In Hebrew, the word that used for created is ברא (bara). So this is "creatio ex nihilo". Before God created the heaven and the earth, there is nothing. No space and no time yet. In Hebrew, השמים (hashamayim) is translated "heaven" but it also has meaning "the sky". Interesting fact, the word מים (mayim) is water in English. Remember when God separated waters under the firmament and above the firmament. So in my opinion, God created water in Genesis 1:1. Thank you
John 1:1-3. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Maybe take another look at fall in the garden in Genisis. Satan did not get Adam to eat the fruit, Eve convinced Adam to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. God said " because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, you must not eat from it, " And God's response to Adam's statement of fact " the woman whom thow gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat" ( original translation ). The next verse is very important! Verse 13. Adam does not deny that he ate of the tree. Verse 12 has been twisted by many to imply that Adam tried to pull a red herring on God when in fact he made a statement in which he admitted to having eaten from the tree. Would really like your hear your rethink on Genisis 3:12-13
You are right. Satan did deceive Eve, and according to the chapter, Adam said it was Eve that gave him the fruit and he ate. I agree with this. I had to rewatch the video to see what I said. I was definitely not articulate enough in what I said. Saying that Satan deceived both Eve and Adam needed to be worded a little better. Although Adam and Eve both knew they were violating God's 1 rule at this point, Eve was deceived by Satan and Adam listened to Eve. When making videos, sometimes you are so focused on making your point that you sometimes lose track of key details. There have been a few times, when I wish I had said something better, and this is one of them. But that is why it is good to have well-intentioned commenters keeping the videos as truthful as possible. I''ll have alot more to say about the Garden of Eden in the future. It doesn't change the focus on the video, but will try to keep all the details as true as possible. Thanks and God Bless
Genesis 1-2:1-3 also parables. Grass, seeds and tress: seed/people; oak, olive, palm, mustard, fig, and their fruit (works), according to its kind. Parallels:.Matthew 13:24-32, 37-53 and Psalm 92:5-9, “…A senseless man has no knowledge, nor does a stupid man understand this: That when the wicked sprouted up like grass and all who did iniquity flourished, it was only that they might be destroyed forevermore. But You, O LORD, are on high forever. For behold, Your enemies, O LORD, for behold, Your enemies will perish; All who do iniquity will be scattered.” There’s much more…
This video is indeed interesting, however there are several biblical inconsistencies. Numerical information in the bible is extremely precise and consistent. The number of the man who is the beast is Six hundred and sixty, six. It is not Six, Six, Six. This is critical to understanding the passage correctly. The reason we need to get this right is because we are instructed, if we have understanding, to calculate the number of his name. These are Doevic if instructions. One critical reason this is so important is because ancient Hebrew and Ancient Greek are the only two alphabets in the world that are also ancient numerical systems. This number directs the reader who has wisdom graciously given by God to various verses and words in the bible. For example there are several verses that = 666 and relay important information for understanding gods word better. There is actually a word in Hebrew that equals this number, the number of the man that would be in place of Jesus Christ, the ant-Christ That word is Tradition. The only word in the bible that equals 666. This directs our study of Gods word as he intended and tells us something critical. That tradition would be used by many in place of relationship and salvation through Jesus Christ. I must disagree this video and I believe that it is in error. The number 6 is not what is being highlighted in Revelation 13, it is 666, not 6,6,6.
I'll stand firm on what I said in the video. It will be important to know when I start discussing what happened in the garden. If you want a specific example in the bible of three 6s. Then read chapters 8 and 9 in Ezekiel. Those chapters parallel the mark of the beast in Revelation. Abominations in the temple in chapter 8, then God marks people to be saved in chapter 9. And the people not bearing the mark of God are killed. This parallels the mark of the beast story in chapter 13 in Revelation. It is unmistakable when you compare them. The reason I bring this example up is because of when it occurred. The abominations happened in the 6th year, on the 6th month and the 6th day. Three different 6s. There is no hundred, nor sixty, just 3 different 6s about the abominations in the temple. God cannot be limited to just one way of understanding and fulfillment. That is the mystery of God. This is just like the story of John the Baptist. All the Jewish people during the time of Jesus were expecting the return of Elijah. Jesus explicitly tells them that Elijah had already returned in the person of John the Baptist. And even when asked directly, John didn't know he was the fulfillment of Elijah returning. So you can see God fulfills things in His ways and not a literal straight forward way in our thinking. You have to expand your thinking, not limit God. This video's description of Satan achieving the mark of 6,6,6 in the garden and taking the 6th day dominion from mankind which parallels the Anti-Christ achieving dominion with 666 is a perfect parallel. I hope I showed you with the parallel of Ezekiel that God can fulfill things in different ways and three 6s does fulfill 6 hundred sixty six. Thanks for watching and your comment. I hope I explained it well. God Bless.
I'm trying to be careful and reveal only what God wants me to reveal. Plus if I'm right and I think I am, then that would put a big target on me. I think the white horse of Revelation 6, the Anti-Christ, will be conquering by next year or the year after. But I will reveal who is the first beast in a video coming soon. Once that is revealed, then the Anti-Christ will be easier to identify if you know your bible and specifically Daniel and Revelation. Thanks and God Bless
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 well your theories or speculation do intrigue me as I enjoy hearing multiple possibilities. If you could I'd like to ask again if you could somehow disclose who u think it is?
I've learnt from Derick Prince that in every generation there is a candidate or candidates for the Antichrist, but that will only fully materialise when the time is right and that may be at the rapture of the church or some other prophetic event.
Tree of good and evil is not a literal tree. It’s not literal fruit either. Who would know the difference of eternal good and eternal evil? Well, seed is what it is for plants and humans (Adam, H120) and Adam (H121).
One popular theory is that he died in year 30AD. But I did a video about the Star of Bethlehem. That video talked about an astronomer named Rick Warren, who used the planet movements themselves that can be tracked with mathematical certainty, to place the crucifixion at 33AD. I'm more inclined to believe in 33AD as date of Jesus' crucifixion.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 Yes, 3 Apr 33, and its calculated according to when Passover fell that year the first Full moon following the spring equinox, there is really no guessing to it. Nasa has the data for thousands of years of solar and lunar eclipses. Its easy to look up, just go to the century marked 0-100, scroll down the spread sheet to the year 33 and there it is. I couldn't believe it when I found it. Remember, Peter its only 10, too early to be drunk, (things never change do they) and Peter says you saw the blood moon it was predicted by Joel. Then recorded by NASA, hehehehe.
TMOTB is mentioned in Revelation 13 BUT Revelation 13 was Totally Fulfilled in the first Century. Therefore there is Nothing in this chapter that has any direct relevance to the 21st Century or beyond.
Just because there are parallels that happened earlier does not mean, there won't be a final Mark coming from the final 2 Beasts in Revelation and humanity's final test. In fact this has been paralleled even within the last century. I will update my video about The Two Witnesses with relevant information from world history that will go hand in hand with Revelation 13 and the Mark of the Beast. I have to disagree, the mark of the beast will happen again.
@@alongcamejones309 Feel free to check out any of my other videos. These connections or parallels keep happening in just about everything and everywhere in the bible. It's like God is preparing you for the things to come, by showing you what has happened in the past. But yes, you will have to wait to see this specific one come true, please just keep an open mind. And keep watching my videos, what I do is reveal all the parallels. It's quite amazing how the same thing keeps happening. God Bless
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 But the final 2 Beasts in Rev 13 are. The first out of the Sea is a combo of both the Empire and Nero. The 2nd Out of the Earth is Israel and it's Apostate Judaism. All 1st Century drama's.
Well... let's see. Facts. They were told that they would be 'like God' knowing 'good' AND 'evil'. Does God know what 'evil' is? Or is this 'function' only available to the Lord?
@@calledisrael434 - incorrect. This is error. LIGHT is 'formed'... not 'created' The 1st step in ANYTHING is 'spiritual'... the 'thought' is the result a 'spirit" KNOWING you, and why this word (know) is used to refer to actions that produce 'fruit'. Remember, Jesus says this (I never knew you) to those who 'seemingly' did the 'works' that Jesus requires and commands, but for reasons not specified are 'rejected'. From here we can see that there is a 'spiritual' connection - wherein the 'works' done for the wrong reasons (not in and thru love or lacking 'love') are NOT acceptable, even though they would have the appearance of being 'compliant' with the 'letter' of the 'law'. This is why the earth is as it is during these times. The rebukes of the Christian church HAVE NOT been out of love and concern for those that have been rebuked, but instead - done in self-righteousness and with anger NOT CONCERN for the targets of these actions. The Messiah (Jesus the Christ) made it clear that we were to pray for, feed, and even clothe our enemies... and the best example I have is the WEDDING CAKE that should have been baked, as this played a big part in the troubles that we have today. The 'thief' that comes sneaks in and does His work from the otherside. When we saw our covenant flag being flown, we should have noticed it, and took it for the sign that it was. Many 'rules of engagement' were broken - no pun intended.
No, the mark of the beast has been paralleled before in history. During the Holocaust under Hitler God's first witness, The Jewish People were marked. They were first forced to wear the star of David. Then in camps they were tattooed on their arms. This will parallel the final mark of the beast for God's second witness. The first mark will be clothing, and then later a physical mark. This has been also paralleled in Genesis. I'll do a video about it sometime. God Bless
Or the mark of the beast is the Islamic Shahada, which denies God the Father, and denies even a need to have a Son. The Shahada’s origination date is in a range that covers 666 ad.
Satan can mark someone with the number 666, but that does not mean that person or someone from there will be the Anti-Christ forcing people to get the mark. There will be a great deception that Paul and Revelation talks about. The Anti-Christ will most likely be someone claiming to be Christian. But will turn on Christians making himself to be God on earth. That is the only way to deceive Christians. I cannot see how any Muslim could deceive Christians.
Another 'waitaminute'... I think there's plentiful scriptural evidence that God (in the person of Jesus) created the waters. Nothing that was created...
I do think that God created water. But I think He inspired Genesis to be written this way for a reason where Genesis 1:2 is indicating darkness and water was there before God issued any commands. This also connects to the second day being the only day that God didn't say anything was good. That was the day he divided the waters. I am a Biblical fundamentalist, but do not try and constrain God to my understanding of the scriptures or fit things that aren't there. I think this approach fits into why the lists of things God created ended up being perfect on the number 6 as noted in this video. There is no command by God to create water in Genesis 1, but that doesn't mean He didn't create water. It was written this way because of what I cited in the video. Hope I explained the theory well. God Bless
The mark is symbolic. It is written on the forehead (mind) and the hand (action). The mark is also falling short of God’s perfection. For God is triune, it’s number is Holy, Holy, Holy= 777. 666 is falling short of perfection because it is a symbolism of extreme imperfection
And without him was nothing made. Jesus was the word that preceded from the mouth of God. He was not the light created on that first day. Be careful that in interpreting the word of God that we allow gods word to interpret itself and that our understanding doesn’t create any contradictions with the Holy word of God.
Jesus fulfills so many things, He is both the Word of God and the light of the world. John 8:12 12 Then Jesus spoke to them again, saying, “I am the light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life.” It is not a coincidence that God's first words were: Genesis 1:3 3 Then God said, “Let there be light”; Because that is when Jesus came into being as the only begotten son of God. Begotten because He came out from God. That is why Jesus said all those "I AM"s too. Since He came out from God, He has the essence of God too as the Word and the light. It all fits together. Read the rest of John 1 and see how John the Baptist was supposed to bear witness to the light and that was referring to Jesus. John's mission was supposed to bear witness to the light and the Word, which are both fulfilled by Jesus Christ Himself. As Jesus said Himself in John 8. BTW, it is not a coincidence that John 1 was written similarly to Genesis 1. That was the whole point to the chapter. And that John's purpose was supposed to bear witness to the light because that was what the original angels job was supposed to be. "to divide the light from the darkness." The language from John 1, John 8 and Genesis 1 matching is on purpose. And we know the angels(Satan) rebelled against God. Also watch my video on the Morning Star, it takes this information and completes it with Jesus taking the title of Morning Star at the end in Revelation. The last light before the everlasting day in Heaven. I do believe I am right on this point, Jesus is the Word of God and the light created on day 1.(the sun was not created until day 4) The bible itself confirms this, from the gospel of John through until Revelation. Hope this helps. God Bless
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 it’s not something I will argue about as it isn’t an issue that should divide us as brothers in Christ nor is this an issue of salvation. However in kindness and with fellowship in mind I will say that I don’t believe what you have said is correctly interpreting scripture in examining this theory. Yes Jesus is the light of the world as truth, light, love are all synonymous in manifold ways biblically/in reality. I would say however that Jesus and the farther are one. Nothing was created without the word, the logos, and so a logical error in my opinion occurs when scripture says nothing was created without the logos and that the being of God, a triune being - (which we know to be the case, as genesis 1:1 already asserts a Hebrew plural which is in fact 3 or more) and further to this the complete God who is described in the Hebrew plural form then creates a being that is said to have created all that was ever created. This is in my opinion a contradiction. So let me ask you, are the son and the father seperate? Are they distinct aspects who are also indivisible, or are they divisible? Is the son not the father? Meditate on the word brother and consider what I have said in relation to it. Keep up the good work also, I have seen some great things brother.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 also to clarify what you believe so I understand your premise more accurately. Do you see the six days of creation as metaphorical as well as literal? And that separating the light and the darkness as metaphor as well as literal or just as metaphor. Peace be with you
@@krombopulosmichael6734 Thanks for your approach, yes I do agree we can discuss things we disagree on, but not to make contentious which is not salvific. That is what I believe and also my approach with brothers and sisters in Christ. Your noticing of the 3rd word in Genesis 'Elohim' being a plural suffix of three persons is exactly the confirmation of the trinity that led me to grasp this concept too. I do believe in the trinity, 3 parts, but 1 God. God the Father, Jesus Christ the begotten son, and the Holy Spirit. If you encounter any one of the parts, you encounter God. That is why Jesus said that He and the Father are one. And why he left His Holy Spirit down here on earth as our infallible helper to help us walk with God, which was always God's intention to have humanity simply walk with Him through life. If we walk with the Holy Spirit, we walk with God. The Holy Spirit is as much as God as Jesus Christ and God the Father. They all came out from God the Father, so they retain the essence of God himself. That is what begotten means, to come out from. So yes, a triune God, but just 1 God. So Jesus is the Word who all things were made through Him, and with that known as a logical fact, then it stands to reason that He can also be the Light that was created on day 1. Which is confirmed by the Word of God Himself in John 8 and John 1. But I think you follow my logic and basis of my theology. If you don't think that Jesus is the light created on day 1, then what do you think the light on day 1 was? I'm guessing you would say God's goodness, a simple metaphor? (I prefer the literal interpretation here obviously) I would again say to compare John 1 with Genesis 1, specifically day 4 and when I think the angels were created. Their function was to divide the light from the darkness, the exact reason that John the Baptist's purpose was described in John 1. But I think I'm repeating myself. To answer your other question about the days of creation. I'm a fundamentalist, so yes the bible is the truth and describes events that actually happened. Now how those events are interpreted and literally occurred is another matter. Genesis 1 is written the way it is, is on purpose. And if you compare Genesis 1 with Genesis 2, the other creation story you might find some seeming inconsistencies. But you have to analyze and interpret why God would let inconsistencies occur in His Holy Bible. That is because Genesis 1 is written the way it was because of how it needs to be interpreted later. It has to be around 4,000 years before the birth of Christ in order to fulfill phophecy and parallels. But I know I just said I'm a fundamentalist, how to I get into symbolic interpretation? We know because the bible clearly says that time is different for God than from us humans. That is clear, a thousand years for us is like a day to God. So a day for God, can mean a different time frame for humanity. But again how does a fundamentalist get into such subjective interpretation? And here is how I square the days of creation having some wiggle room with a fundamentalist. We know that a day is measured by the earth rotating on its axis. And a year is the earth's orbit around the sun. How can time be measured for the first 3 days, if the sun, moon and stars were not created until day 4? How can you measure each of the first 3 days of creation, if the measure of time was not created? Read Day 4 specifically, it explicitly says the time of days and years was not created until then. This will start making sense as I do more videos, biblical prophecy is based on 360 day years, while now we know years are measured by 365.25 days. Why the difference? Because the angels are symbolized by the stars and day 4 in Genesis 1 has dual meaning, so Satan's rebellion with man caused a time difference and distance between us and God. And also why the Anti-Christ is said to try and change the time. I will do a video about this which will prove the theory with mathematics, it is amazing. But that needs to come in time. But just know that this is a real thing, the changing of time, because the Son of God, Jesus Christ, literally changed time Himself. Our whole calendar is based on the life of Jesus Christ. God told Satan, you might try and change time, But I have the ultimate authority on time. I hope I haven't lost you with this. To come full circle, the 6 days of creation in Genesis 1 are there for bible prophecy and parallels. But I do not see any problems with a fundamentalist interpreting the first 3 days of creation as longer time periods since time for humans was not created until day 4. I hope I got all your points answered. Thanks for the comments and approach. God Bless
The earth created was water…he made the dry land days later. Also for you to say God created Jesus as Light makes Jesus a created being. I DO NOT AGREE as Jesus Being God wasn’t created but is God.
That was inarticulate on my part. I went through a long discourse of Jesus coming out of God as the Word of God and thus is God. I did not mean to say that Jesus was created, but that the light people say was created on day 1 was Jesus. When you do videos, sometimes you wish you could have take backs for things said you didn't mean. This is one of them. Jesus was not created. He came from God as the Light and the Word of God.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 thank you for clarification. You could o rewrite a Closed Caption on your video. It would help. Bless you and thank you for all your hard work for God! Praying for you.
No they aren't, and according to Revelation you can be marked on the hand or the forehead. They won't even happen at the same time. This has been paralleled with God's first Witness, The Jewish People during the Holocaust in WWII. The Jewish people were first marked with the Star of David, and then in the camps received a tattoo mark. This will parallel the mark of the beast, first comes a clothing mark, then later comes a physical mark.
Where in scriptures does it say Hasatan is a fallen angel. I believe it says it is a man. Spirit not physical. The king of Babylon is Hasatan "the Advasary" So Adam in the garden must be a different man than the ones created with their wives. Add the man who is the bloodline of the Hebrew peoples and this should be fact as we have the genealogies from Christ to Adam who as written was the son of GoD. The rest of the people are not in this list. Jew and Gentiles mind you🤔 This would show Hasatan as a man not an Angel!
It is widely accepted that Satan is a fallen angel made by God. In the Book of Job it talks about the sons of God, which includes Satan. Angels would be sons of God, since they were made by God. Just like Adam would be considered a son of God in the genealogy of Jesus because he also was made by God. In the Book of Ezekiel in chapters 1 and 10, Ezekiel sees a vision of creatures that have different faces. One of the faces the creatures have is of man. And in chapter 10, it confirms that the vision in both chapters is of the same creature which turn out to be cherubim angels. So angels can have the appearance of man. I didn't follow your train of thought otherwise. Just because someone is not in the bloodline to Jesus does not make a difference in being a son of God. There were lots of God's people that were not in the bloodline to Jesus Christ.
Exodus 13; 9 and Deut 11; 18 "Phylacteries" the Jews wrapped about their heads and their right hand and arm. Right? you know this. The "Marks" of the faithful Jew. Incense is dispensed with right hand and with your mind you profess. These are the "Characteristics" of worship of the faithful that is aped by Satan, this is the reason for the "marks" on the head and or hand. Next, Nero's name in Hebrew adds to up to 666 and he demanded incensing in this manner, with the right hand, and professing verbally, with the mind. Under Nero you were unable to participate in commerce. The marks could be the "Character" of the antichrist? Do you see this? maybe a lot of people are approaching this from the wrong angle. Faith is in the mind (prayer) and translated to your hands {work), Faith without works is dead, somewhere in James, hehehe "Ora et Labora" the marks of the faithful, aped by Satan. If you profess sinful things and work to promote those things, YOU HAVE TAKEN THE MARKS OF THE BEAST. If you think it is a barcode or a Vax I believe you are mistaken, like when was the last time you were vaxxed between the eyes. hehehehe
I will do a video about what the mark of the beast will be, I think I know. It will be a literal mark, but fulfilled in a couple different ways. This has already been foreshadowed in history. Think about God's first chosen people, now known as the Jewish people. They are the first witness of God. They faced real persecution in WWII under Hitler and the Holocaust. But think about what you have heard about their history in Germany. They were marked during the time in Germany. First with the Star of David which had them marked as Jews, then when the Holocaust began they were physically marked in the camps with a tattoo. First with clothing and then with a physical mark toward the end and real killing of God's people. This is how it is going to play out with Christians and the mark of the beast in Revelation. It has been also foreshadowed in the bible as well in Genesis. That will come in time, when I'm ready to do a video on it. Just remember the first mark will be a piece of clothing, then the second will be a physical mark. Now plug that into what you know about where the mark of the beast will be. These parallels are amazing. God is coordinating an amazing story that keeps happening over and over again. It's like giant clues as to what will happen. Hope this helps, God Bless.
HOW COULD JESUS BE THE LIGHT THAT GOD CREATED ON DAY 1 WHEN ON DAY ONE IT IS TO THE MATERIAL UNIVERSE THAT WAS BEING CREATED? " "Then Jehovah answered Job out of the windstorm: 2 “Who is this who is obscuring my counsel And speaking without knowledge? 3 Brace yourself, please, like a man; I will question you, and you inform me. 4 Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me, if you think you understand. 5 Who set its measurements, in case you know, Or who stretched a measuring line across it? 6 Into what were its pedestals sunk, Or who laid its cornerstone, 7 When the morning stars joyfully cried out together, And all the sons of God began shouting in applause? Job 38:1-7 WHEN SUCH FACTS CONCERNING CREATION ARE BEING OBSCURED BY THE MAKER OF THIS VIDEO THERE IS A NEED TO HUMBLE ONE'S SELF IN ORDER TO BE TAUGHT BY THOSE WHO THE MASTER HAS APPOINTED (MATTHEW 24:45-47) IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO: "Do your utmost to present yourself approved to God, a workman with nothing to be ashamed of, handling the word of the truth aright." 2 Timothy 2:15 OTHERWISE THESE WORDS OF THE MASTER WILL BE SURE TO OVERTAKE SUCH ONE'S: "“I tell you that men will render an account on Judgment Day for every unprofitable saying that they speak; 37 for by your words you will be declared righteous, and by your words you will be condemned.” Matthew 12:36
I stand behind the theology that Jesus came into being at the first moment when God the Father spoke, "Let there be Light" since Jesus is the Word of God and the Light of the World. And the First and the Last, the Alpha and the Omega. And the only begotten Son of God, since begotten means to come out from. Jesus is God because He came out from God and thus has the essence of God. Jesus being the light on day 1 fits perfectly since the sun wasn't created until day 4.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 THE SCRIPTURES STAND BEHIND THE FOLLOWING: IN GENESIS 1:2 THE EARTH WAS FORMED/CREATED BEFORE LIGHT CAME TO BE THEREFORE JESUS COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CREATED IN THE LATE PERIOD OF LIGHT COMING INTO EXISTENCE BECAUSE HE WAS USED BY GOD TO BRING FORTH LIGHT INTO EXISTENCE BEING THAT HE ALSO WAS USED IN BRINGING FORTH OTHER SPIRIT CREATURES BEFORE THE MATERIAL UNIVERSE WAS CREATED: “Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: because by means of him all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him and for him.” Colossians 1:15,16 EVEN MORESO, JESUS PLAINLY TELLS US: “To the angel of the congregation in La·o·di·ceʹa write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation by God” Revelation 3:14 AS THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION AND THE IMAGE OF HIS CREATOR THE LIGHT MENTIONED @ GENESIS 1:2 IS A CREATION THAT GOD USED JESUS TO BRING FORTH: “Therefore, in response Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to you, the Son cannot do a single thing of his own initiative, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever things that One does, these things the Son does also in like manner.” John 5:19 GOD HIMSELF IS ALSO LIGHT AND BEING THAT JESUS WAS MADE IN HIS IMAGE HE TOO WOULD BE LIGHT BUT NOT THE LIGHT THAT WAS CREATED @ GENESIS 1:2 AS THAT LIGHT HAS TO DO WITH MATERIAL LIGHT THAT WE CAN SEE WHILE BOTH GOD AND HIS FIRST CREATION ARE SAID TO BE: “…unapproachable light” 1 Timothy 6:16 THEREFORE SINCE JESUS CREATED THE THINGS IN THE HEAVENS/THE ANGELS THAT WERE CREATED BEFORE THE MATERIAL WORLD WAS CREATED THERE IS NO ROOM FOR HIM TO NEED TO BE RECREATED AS THE LIGHT MENTIONED IN GENESIS 1:2 - AS THAT WOULD MEAN THAT HE COULD NOT HAVE HAD THE EXPERIENCE RELATED TO US @ COLOSSIANS 1:15,16
Revelation 12:4 Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth. 1÷3=0.333... So 0.666... is the factor i.e. 'number' of the heavenly host i.e. 'stars' that Satan still wants to subvert or destroy, that he curses from Hell. 1=0.333...×3 but if you think about it=0.999... so really 1=0.333...×2+0.333...4 So the true number of angels that remained was 0.666...7 but Satan would like it to be less so he targets the 0.000...1 which was Jesus as a human. The need for divine intervention is exposed when one 'wipes away' 0.333... from the whole/holy 1, because then you see how God needs to transform the tiniest 6 into a 7 to complete the trinity. But Satan wants just infinite 6's after the 0. Humans living for humans (6), never seeing God (7) saved the universe by becoming a 6 in order that a 6 might become a 7 unto itself, no longer needing divine intervention. God saw 1=0.999... and said that it was not good 7 so loved 6 that 7 gave his only son to complete the trinity.
Jesus is NOT God ! How do I know because the Bible says so ! It says He is God's Son & when asked 'when will you return' He said' I do not know no one knows nor does the Son only the Father in Heaven' .....is the Bible a lie , does Jesus lie ....NO!.... your doctrine is false sadly......when the Bible says the Word was made flesh simply means God put His Word into a begotten son with His Authority....maybe hard for you to accept but it is Father , Son & Holy Ghost - the Tri head acting & thinking as one but separate entities.....Maranatha Shalom.....old Messianic Jew.
Jesus was a Jew, and I would think He knew exactly what was implied when He said all those "I am"s. That would not be mistaken by any Jewish person of that time, nor now. On this channel, Jesus Christ is God. The second part of the trinity. The story of Jesus not knowing the time of His return simply means He is the Word of God, God the Father only knows the time of the end. It has not be spoken yet. That is rather easy to understand and does not deny the divine nature of Jesus. But shalom to you as well, may you question more so that God can open your eyes.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "Doctrine of the Trinity" came about in the 300's AD at the Council of Nicea, I think. Until then, there wasn't really a unified understanding of the Godhead: I'm guessing a bunch of Cardinals were there and they blended all the various beliefs of the time into this one impossibly complex doctrine, then told us all to accept it by faith. For me, it's handy to know there are at least three ways that the Almighty HAS manifested Himself to us humans. I accept them all; I pray to each according to the function outlined in the New Testament. In Truth, God is too big for us to understand, and the DOCTRINE of the Trinity--or any other doctrine--can't do justice to the Creator. So you're right! I'm just glad the Cardinals in Nicea didn't include a burning bush in the Trinity. I can imagine some people flocking to a brush fire thinking it was the almighty! But seriously, Wikipedia outlines the Trinity, if it needs to be set down in words. Personally, my teaching is that this doctrine exists whether God is this way or not---and that's all that matters. Worship Him in Spirit and in Truth: I take my doubts to Him daily, and I thank Him in Jesus' name for giving me the conduit of access to Him. I wouldn't know God, if it weren't for Jesus. And I wouldn't be lead to do God's will if not for the Holy Spirit. Always Seek Him, and he will reveal Himself in His time. All honor and Glory to Him, and blessings to you!
Hey genius, what species were you parents? Were they human? You’re their child. What are you? Are you a turtle, a giraffe, an owl? I’d say you’re probably human. Would God’s son be a badger, a cricket, or would He be God? The Word was God(John 1:1) before He was made flesh(v14).It’s not that complicated!
@@mikebrown9850 When you write to someone in a smart-arse way you clearly lack understanding God's Way - Jesus Christ & therefore HIS Words sadly - we are supposed to mirror HIM -not that I hold myself a great example . The only complication I see is you simply twist God's Words. HE made HIS Son within which you find HIS Words -God's Voice....hope you can lose your attitude .....Shalom....old Messianic Jew
Your channel had 7.77k subs when I found you yesterday, now it’s 8.6 😮
In the beginning He was with God. Through Him all things were made; without Him nothing was made that was ever made (John 1 2:4) I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.(Jesus speaking)(Revelation 22:13)
The entire book of revelation is organized in a chiasm and helps to know this when reading this book. This is something I just recently learned and I think it is absolutely amazing and could only be a design of God.
Yes, when I first learned about chiastic structures, I looked into it for more research. I discovered that every narrative book of the bible is structured this way. And you can gleam so much more knowledge when you connect the step with its corresponding step on the other side.
I first discovered it when reading Noah's story, where it is very clear with the numbers. Then researching more I found that Genesis has several chiastic structures in each storyline that is bracketed inside of a chiastic structure of the whole book. It is really amazing and quite complex.
When you look into it more, this explains why the Gospel of John was written in the way it was. The cleansing of the temple begins his gospel, while Jesus' body is cleansed near the end. (because of course his body becomes the new temple) There are lots more amazing steps just like that.
If you are really interested in this, then pick your favorite book, if yours is Revelation then great. Then do some line by line research and find the steps in every structure. I know it is in Revelation but have not done it thoroughly there.
I love to study the structure of the bible, there is something else that is even bigger that I am researching about the structure. But that is time consuming and won't be ready for some time. For now, I just do these connections and parallels. God is truly amazing, and there is so much more to unlock and reveal upon more study. I hope you keep at it my friend, God Bless
In regards to what you said about “God not creating the darkness”
“I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.”
Isaiah 45:7 KJV
Compare Genesis 1 and compare this verse and what God is saying. It's not that He created darkness, but when God formed the light that made you realize there was darkness in contrast.
This is a great verse to demonstrate why I don't prefer the KJV. It's confusing! See here: God cannot "create evil", since He is Holy. People that hate God will take a verse like that and run for days with it! God baffles and confuses the wicked; He manifests miracles no one expects; He causes calamity to befall those not in His will... But He doesn't "create evil".
The KJV was a fine translation 400+ years ago. It was written at about the same time William Shakespeare was writing plays! I can't understand a single one of his plays without constantly referencing the footnotes or dictionary. The language has changed that much. So many words have become obsolete or are archaic. Add to that that the fact that phrases in one language do not always translate well into another. I prefer the NASB. It takes most of the legwork out of reading the Word without gutting the scriptures of their power. I believe the only right way to get the full meaning of what's written is to understand it in the context of the time and original language.
With all that said, the most useful reference materials I have are my King James and may Strongs Exhaustive Concordance. For the life of me, I can't memorize all the scriptures I would like to, but I can look up phrases in the concordance. What's practical about that is that the KJV uses the same word frequently enough to make finding it easy. The KJV hasn't changed for a long time.
@@wbshappy1
Do you have an explanation for these verses? Isn’t Yahweh (God) the creator of ALL?
“Now it came about on the next day that an evil spirit FROM God came mightily upon Saul, and he raved in the midst of the house, while David was playing the harp with his hand, as usual; and a spear was in Saul’s hand.”
1 Samuel 18:10 NASB1995
“Now it came about on the next day that an evil spirit FROM God rushed upon Saul, and he raved in the midst of the house while David was playing the harp with his hand, as usual; and a spear was in Saul’s hand.”
1 Samuel 18:10 NASB2020
I think I can explain it. it was the condemnation of the lord for Saul rejecting God's leadership. When the Lord withdrew his anointing from Saul for his arrogance, and gave it to David, Saul was jealous. it just happened to coincide with David's being in Saul's presence, so that Saul could try to kill David.twice.
You'll recall that David was a very different sort from Saul. Saul's daughter mocked David for dancing with the peasants at the return of the Ark. (ref: Michal; 2 Samuel 6.16-23) What we see is the difference between an unspiritual, fleshly, carnal king and a worshipper, although imperfect, of God.
But I ASSUME You're actually talking about the term, ""From" God. Here's a thought for you. Saul, like Pharaoh whose heart was "hardened" by Yahweh, had turned antagonistic to Yahweh. The thought of Him and not being able to have all the glory for himself was intolerable. In Pharaoh eyes, God had defeated all the gods of Egypt (including pharaoh himself who was thought of as a deity) through Moses. Saul's HUGE problem was rebellion and insubordination to Yahweh.In 1 Sam 15.17 God rebukes Saul through the Prophet for not remaining "small in his own eyes..." Too I submit that neither Saul nor Pharaoh really knew Yahweh. There's even a couple times where Saul refers to Yahweh as "your God"--not his own. The was just no room in Saul's heart for anyone but Saul.
Does this answer your question?@@c.c_mac
It could well be the description of an oppressive demonic spirit; or a madness too..
@@c.c_mac
Fascinating. I don't want to be unfaithful anymore.
Very good. Day 3 is a parable as all the other “days”. You look for parallels, yes? Light is righteousness. Darkness is not. There is a great divide spiritually between Light and Darkness. There’s a few applications for light (stars, fixed stars/planets, sun and moon) in heavens and light in heavens as spiritual Light (Lord of hosts/angels), which are His servants (Gabriel, Michael etc). There is also physical stars Jeremiah 10:2, Psalm 19:1-2, Amos 5:8-9.
El [LORD] is Light and in Him there’s no darkness (1st John 1:5). Isaiah 45:7, “I create the Light and make the darkness…”
Ok watched David and Absolom, I can add two more comparisons. "Not one hair of his head would fall to the earth" and "they will break none of his bones". Both are expressions of preserving some aspect of their bodies despite experiencing violent deaths. Also Christ's heart was pierced by a lance as Absolom was. Theres another thought that just came to me, but I have to study it further. Fantastic study.
Thanks for your well thought out response. You may very well be correct about a physical mark I also believe it highly probable but simply for salvation sake it doesnt matter if we take a mark that we shouldn't, we are lost, or if we participate in sinful behavior we will be lost. Lost is lost. Do you know what a chiasm is? I am also interested in scriptural discoveries I have discovered a few of my own would love to share some with you.
I think it will matter if we take the mark, it's humanity's second chance with food. And Revelation says of you take it, you won't make it. You might have a point, that the people who take it, weren't going to make it anyway. I believe in life after death, so like Abraham have faith in God and won;t take the mark no matter what. Even if my loved ones die before me.
Yes, have heard about chiasms. Love to hear your thoughts.
OK I suspected these structures could be found elsewhere just haven't taken the time to research that yet. I will share with you one of my recent discoveries that I found fascinating and that is the four, "I will" statements that are found in Exodus 6; 6-7 that are the format Jewish Passover meal are found in the exact reverse order in Psalm 30(31); 1-5 (Free, Deliver, Rescue, Take in Ex and then Take, Rescue, Deliver, Free in Psalm 30(31). David's prayer mirrors what God promised to Moses in Exodus. Like two hands in prayer meeting together. verse 6
@@socratesfriend745 Yes, good one. Check out my video about David and his rebellious son Absalom. David retraced the steps of his son exactly in reverse. I do believe there is much deeper meaning about these things happening in reverse order. Not only if you look at the world today and compare it to early Genesis, there seems to be an unraveling of God's creation. Like we are going in reverse order of His creation. I think this is what God was hinting at. And end times of Revelation will be much like the Tower of Babel in Genesis 11.
Yes, I see symbolic replays happening in the world again and again. That is what these parallels are about and how God was going to warn us of the dangers ahead. Thanks for that example you cited. God Bless
Thank you,👏👍well explained...
Thank you for your videos.
Bravo! Well done, brother. 🙏🏾
One question; so who created water?
There is a Rabbinic theory out there that there was a world before this one. But that world did not please God, for reasons only He would know. The Rabbis explored this theory further that maybe in the other world, the first humans did not disobey God by eating of the fruit from the forbidden tree. Maybe God wanted us to be broken and be able to find obedience through our struggles to be able to be reunited with God again. That's their theory, but an interesting exercise based on the text. I don't know if I can buy into their theory that God wanted a broken relationship with mankind. Just doesn't seem like a logical theory.
We know that God created everything, so He would have had to have created waters. But why does Genesis 1:2 say that the Spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters before there was anything? I think it was written this way for the reasons cited in this video. God wanted the things created to be listed and the fruit tree to be the 6th thing created.
If you study Genesis 2 and compare it to Genesis 1, things don't seem to be in the same order. I think because Genesis 1 was written to be just a list of things, but the narration starting in Genesis 2 and 3, are the actual order of things. I am not a strict literalist, I give God leeway to create and fulfill things His way, and I won't try to constrain Him by my understanding of the scriptures. I hope I explained my theory well.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 thank you for your explanation. Genesis 1:1 (KJV)said that "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth". In Hebrew, the word that used for created is ברא (bara). So this is "creatio ex nihilo". Before God created the heaven and the earth, there is nothing. No space and no time yet. In Hebrew, השמים (hashamayim) is translated "heaven" but it also has meaning "the sky". Interesting fact, the word מים (mayim) is water in English. Remember when God separated waters under the firmament and above the firmament.
So in my opinion, God created water in Genesis 1:1. Thank you
John 1:1-3. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Maybe take another look at fall in the garden in Genisis. Satan did not get Adam to eat the fruit, Eve convinced Adam to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. God said " because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, you must not eat from it, " And God's response to Adam's statement of fact " the woman whom thow gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat" ( original translation ). The next verse is very important! Verse 13. Adam does not deny that he ate of the tree. Verse 12 has been twisted by many to imply that Adam tried to pull a red herring on God when in fact he made a statement in which he admitted to having eaten from the tree. Would really like your hear your rethink on Genisis 3:12-13
You are right. Satan did deceive Eve, and according to the chapter, Adam said it was Eve that gave him the fruit and he ate. I agree with this.
I had to rewatch the video to see what I said. I was definitely not articulate enough in what I said. Saying that Satan deceived both Eve and Adam needed to be worded a little better. Although Adam and Eve both knew they were violating God's 1 rule at this point, Eve was deceived by Satan and Adam listened to Eve.
When making videos, sometimes you are so focused on making your point that you sometimes lose track of key details. There have been a few times, when I wish I had said something better, and this is one of them. But that is why it is good to have well-intentioned commenters keeping the videos as truthful as possible.
I''ll have alot more to say about the Garden of Eden in the future. It doesn't change the focus on the video, but will try to keep all the details as true as possible. Thanks and God Bless
Excellent teaching! Thank you
Very interesting insights into Genesis and parallels!
Genesis 1-2:1-3 also parables. Grass, seeds and tress: seed/people; oak, olive, palm, mustard, fig, and their fruit (works), according to its kind. Parallels:.Matthew 13:24-32, 37-53 and Psalm 92:5-9, “…A senseless man has no knowledge, nor does a stupid man understand this: That when the wicked sprouted up like grass and all who did iniquity flourished, it was only that they might be destroyed forevermore. But You, O LORD, are on high forever. For behold, Your enemies, O LORD, for behold, Your enemies will perish; All who do iniquity will be scattered.” There’s much more…
This video is indeed interesting, however there are several biblical inconsistencies.
Numerical information in the bible is extremely precise and consistent. The number of the man who is the beast is Six hundred and sixty, six. It is not Six, Six, Six.
This is critical to understanding the passage correctly. The reason we need to get this right is because we are instructed, if we have understanding, to calculate the number of his name. These are Doevic if instructions.
One critical reason this is so important is because ancient Hebrew and Ancient Greek are the only two alphabets in the world that are also ancient numerical systems.
This number directs the reader who has wisdom graciously given by God to various verses and words in the bible.
For example there are several verses that = 666 and relay important information for understanding gods word better.
There is actually a word in Hebrew that equals this number, the number of the man that would be in place of Jesus Christ, the ant-Christ
That word is Tradition.
The only word in the bible that equals 666. This directs our study of Gods word as he intended and tells us something critical. That tradition would be used by many in place of relationship and salvation through Jesus Christ.
I must disagree this video and I believe that it is in error. The number 6 is not what is being highlighted in Revelation 13, it is 666, not 6,6,6.
I'll stand firm on what I said in the video. It will be important to know when I start discussing what happened in the garden.
If you want a specific example in the bible of three 6s. Then read chapters 8 and 9 in Ezekiel. Those chapters parallel the mark of the beast in Revelation. Abominations in the temple in chapter 8, then God marks people to be saved in chapter 9. And the people not bearing the mark of God are killed. This parallels the mark of the beast story in chapter 13 in Revelation. It is unmistakable when you compare them.
The reason I bring this example up is because of when it occurred. The abominations happened in the 6th year, on the 6th month and the 6th day. Three different 6s. There is no hundred, nor sixty, just 3 different 6s about the abominations in the temple.
God cannot be limited to just one way of understanding and fulfillment. That is the mystery of God. This is just like the story of John the Baptist. All the Jewish people during the time of Jesus were expecting the return of Elijah. Jesus explicitly tells them that Elijah had already returned in the person of John the Baptist. And even when asked directly, John didn't know he was the fulfillment of Elijah returning. So you can see God fulfills things in His ways and not a literal straight forward way in our thinking. You have to expand your thinking, not limit God.
This video's description of Satan achieving the mark of 6,6,6 in the garden and taking the 6th day dominion from mankind which parallels the Anti-Christ achieving dominion with 666 is a perfect parallel. I hope I showed you with the parallel of Ezekiel that God can fulfill things in different ways and three 6s does fulfill 6 hundred sixty six. Thanks for watching and your comment. I hope I explained it well. God Bless.
You should do a video on who you think is the antichrist
I'm trying to be careful and reveal only what God wants me to reveal. Plus if I'm right and I think I am, then that would put a big target on me. I think the white horse of Revelation 6, the Anti-Christ, will be conquering by next year or the year after.
But I will reveal who is the first beast in a video coming soon. Once that is revealed, then the Anti-Christ will be easier to identify if you know your bible and specifically Daniel and Revelation. Thanks and God Bless
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 well your theories or speculation do intrigue me as I enjoy hearing multiple possibilities. If you could I'd like to ask again if you could somehow disclose who u think it is?
@@krim1524 Send me an email address, only offline.
I've learnt from Derick Prince that in every generation there is a candidate or candidates for the Antichrist, but that will only fully materialise when the time is right and that may be at the rapture of the church or some other prophetic event.
Tree of good and evil is not a literal tree. It’s not literal fruit either. Who would know the difference of eternal good and eternal evil? Well, seed is what it is for plants and humans (Adam, H120) and Adam (H121).
Heres what I do. Do you know the date of the crucifixion? On the Gregorian calendar?
One popular theory is that he died in year 30AD. But I did a video about the Star of Bethlehem. That video talked about an astronomer named Rick Warren, who used the planet movements themselves that can be tracked with mathematical certainty, to place the crucifixion at 33AD. I'm more inclined to believe in 33AD as date of Jesus' crucifixion.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 Yes, 3 Apr 33, and its calculated according to when Passover fell that year the first Full moon following the spring equinox, there is really no guessing to it. Nasa has the data for thousands of years of solar and lunar eclipses. Its easy to look up, just go to the century marked 0-100, scroll down the spread sheet to the year 33 and there it is. I couldn't believe it when I found it. Remember, Peter its only 10, too early to be drunk, (things never change do they) and Peter says you saw the blood moon it was predicted by Joel. Then recorded by NASA, hehehehe.
TMOTB is mentioned in Revelation 13 BUT Revelation 13 was Totally Fulfilled in the first Century. Therefore there is Nothing in this chapter that has any direct relevance to the 21st Century or beyond.
Just because there are parallels that happened earlier does not mean, there won't be a final Mark coming from the final 2 Beasts in Revelation and humanity's final test. In fact this has been paralleled even within the last century. I will update my video about The Two Witnesses with relevant information from world history that will go hand in hand with Revelation 13 and the Mark of the Beast. I have to disagree, the mark of the beast will happen again.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 I doubt that very much, but we will have to wait and see. I do not believe in double fulfillment of Prophecy. 🤔😊
@@alongcamejones309 Feel free to check out any of my other videos. These connections or parallels keep happening in just about everything and everywhere in the bible. It's like God is preparing you for the things to come, by showing you what has happened in the past. But yes, you will have to wait to see this specific one come true, please just keep an open mind. And keep watching my videos, what I do is reveal all the parallels. It's quite amazing how the same thing keeps happening. God Bless
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 God Bless friend
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 But the final 2 Beasts in Rev 13 are. The first out of the Sea is a combo of both the Empire and Nero. The 2nd Out of the Earth is Israel and it's Apostate Judaism. All 1st Century drama's.
Well... let's see. Facts. They were told that they would be 'like God' knowing 'good' AND 'evil'. Does God know what 'evil' is? Or is this 'function' only available to the Lord?
Yahweh created it ALL -Isaiah 45;7 ' creating light & darkness, goodness & calamity'.....I should thin k He does!.....Shalom.
@@calledisrael434 - incorrect. This is error. LIGHT is 'formed'... not 'created'
The 1st step in ANYTHING is 'spiritual'... the 'thought' is the result a 'spirit" KNOWING you, and why this word (know) is used to refer to actions that produce 'fruit'. Remember, Jesus says this (I never knew you) to those who 'seemingly' did the 'works' that Jesus requires and commands, but for reasons not specified are 'rejected'.
From here we can see that there is a 'spiritual' connection - wherein the 'works' done for the wrong reasons (not in and thru love or lacking 'love') are NOT acceptable, even though they would have the appearance of being 'compliant' with the 'letter' of the 'law'.
This is why the earth is as it is during these times. The rebukes of the Christian church HAVE NOT been out of love and concern for those that have been rebuked, but instead - done in self-righteousness and with anger NOT CONCERN for the targets of these actions.
The Messiah (Jesus the Christ) made it clear that we were to pray for, feed, and even clothe our enemies... and the best example I have is the WEDDING CAKE that should have been baked, as this played a big part in the troubles that we have today.
The 'thief' that comes sneaks in and does His work from the otherside. When we saw our covenant flag being flown, we should have noticed it, and took it for the sign that it was. Many 'rules of engagement' were broken - no pun intended.
We need to find out what or who is this beast in order to know what is his mark....is .the number the same as the mark?
No, the mark of the beast has been paralleled before in history. During the Holocaust under Hitler God's first witness, The Jewish People were marked. They were first forced to wear the star of David. Then in camps they were tattooed on their arms. This will parallel the final mark of the beast for God's second witness. The first mark will be clothing, and then later a physical mark. This has been also paralleled in Genesis. I'll do a video about it sometime. God Bless
Or the mark of the beast is the Islamic Shahada, which denies God the Father, and denies even a need to have a Son. The Shahada’s origination date is in a range that covers 666 ad.
Satan can mark someone with the number 666, but that does not mean that person or someone from there will be the Anti-Christ forcing people to get the mark.
There will be a great deception that Paul and Revelation talks about. The Anti-Christ will most likely be someone claiming to be Christian. But will turn on Christians making himself to be God on earth. That is the only way to deceive Christians.
I cannot see how any Muslim could deceive Christians.
Another 'waitaminute'... I think there's plentiful scriptural evidence that God (in the person of Jesus) created the waters.
Nothing that was created...
But God created everything including water, right? Like how can water be eternal?
I do think that God created water. But I think He inspired Genesis to be written this way for a reason where Genesis 1:2 is indicating darkness and water was there before God issued any commands. This also connects to the second day being the only day that God didn't say anything was good. That was the day he divided the waters.
I am a Biblical fundamentalist, but do not try and constrain God to my understanding of the scriptures or fit things that aren't there. I think this approach fits into why the lists of things God created ended up being perfect on the number 6 as noted in this video. There is no command by God to create water in Genesis 1, but that doesn't mean He didn't create water. It was written this way because of what I cited in the video.
Hope I explained the theory well. God Bless
6oo [Jewish laws] 60 degree triangles of the Star of Rhemphan. 6 sides of its [hexagon] or the 6 sides of the black cube.
Aren't there 613 Jewish laws?
The mark is symbolic. It is written on the forehead (mind) and the hand (action). The mark is also falling short of God’s perfection. For God is triune, it’s number is Holy, Holy, Holy= 777. 666 is falling short of perfection because it is a symbolism of extreme imperfection
For all have fallen short of the glory of God, so we're all the anti-Christ 👍
You are seriously not keeping up with technology. There is absolutely no reason to consider this symbolic rather than physical.
And without him was nothing made. Jesus was the word that preceded from the mouth of God. He was not the light created on that first day. Be careful that in interpreting the word of God that we allow gods word to interpret itself and that our understanding doesn’t create any contradictions with the Holy word of God.
Jesus fulfills so many things, He is both the Word of God and the light of the world.
John 8:12
12 Then Jesus spoke to them again, saying, “I am the light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life.”
It is not a coincidence that God's first words were:
Genesis 1:3
3 Then God said, “Let there be light”;
Because that is when Jesus came into being as the only begotten son of God. Begotten because He came out from God. That is why Jesus said all those "I AM"s too. Since He came out from God, He has the essence of God too as the Word and the light. It all fits together.
Read the rest of John 1 and see how John the Baptist was supposed to bear witness to the light and that was referring to Jesus. John's mission was supposed to bear witness to the light and the Word, which are both fulfilled by Jesus Christ Himself. As Jesus said Himself in John 8. BTW, it is not a coincidence that John 1 was written similarly to Genesis 1. That was the whole point to the chapter. And that John's purpose was supposed to bear witness to the light because that was what the original angels job was supposed to be. "to divide the light from the darkness." The language from John 1, John 8 and Genesis 1 matching is on purpose. And we know the angels(Satan) rebelled against God.
Also watch my video on the Morning Star, it takes this information and completes it with Jesus taking the title of Morning Star at the end in Revelation. The last light before the everlasting day in Heaven.
I do believe I am right on this point, Jesus is the Word of God and the light created on day 1.(the sun was not created until day 4) The bible itself confirms this, from the gospel of John through until Revelation. Hope this helps. God Bless
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 it’s not something I will argue about as it isn’t an issue that should divide us as brothers in Christ nor is this an issue of salvation. However in kindness and with fellowship in mind I will say that I don’t believe what you have said is correctly interpreting scripture in examining this theory.
Yes Jesus is the light of the world as truth, light, love are all synonymous in manifold ways biblically/in reality.
I would say however that Jesus and the farther are one. Nothing was created without the word, the logos, and so a logical error in my opinion occurs when scripture says nothing was created without the logos and that the being of God, a triune being - (which we know to be the case, as genesis 1:1 already asserts a Hebrew plural which is in fact 3 or more) and further to this the complete God who is described in the Hebrew plural form then creates a being that is said to have created all that was ever created. This is in my opinion a contradiction.
So let me ask you, are the son and the father seperate? Are they distinct aspects who are also indivisible, or are they divisible?
Is the son not the father?
Meditate on the word brother and consider what I have said in relation to it.
Keep up the good work also, I have seen some great things brother.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 also to clarify what you believe so I understand your premise more accurately. Do you see the six days of creation as metaphorical as well as literal? And that separating the light and the darkness as metaphor as well as literal or just as metaphor.
Peace be with you
@@krombopulosmichael6734 Thanks for your approach, yes I do agree we can discuss things we disagree on, but not to make contentious which is not salvific. That is what I believe and also my approach with brothers and sisters in Christ.
Your noticing of the 3rd word in Genesis 'Elohim' being a plural suffix of three persons is exactly the confirmation of the trinity that led me to grasp this concept too. I do believe in the trinity, 3 parts, but 1 God. God the Father, Jesus Christ the begotten son, and the Holy Spirit. If you encounter any one of the parts, you encounter God. That is why Jesus said that He and the Father are one. And why he left His Holy Spirit down here on earth as our infallible helper to help us walk with God, which was always God's intention to have humanity simply walk with Him through life. If we walk with the Holy Spirit, we walk with God. The Holy Spirit is as much as God as Jesus Christ and God the Father. They all came out from God the Father, so they retain the essence of God himself. That is what begotten means, to come out from. So yes, a triune God, but just 1 God.
So Jesus is the Word who all things were made through Him, and with that known as a logical fact, then it stands to reason that He can also be the Light that was created on day 1. Which is confirmed by the Word of God Himself in John 8 and John 1. But I think you follow my logic and basis of my theology.
If you don't think that Jesus is the light created on day 1, then what do you think the light on day 1 was? I'm guessing you would say God's goodness, a simple metaphor? (I prefer the literal interpretation here obviously) I would again say to compare John 1 with Genesis 1, specifically day 4 and when I think the angels were created. Their function was to divide the light from the darkness, the exact reason that John the Baptist's purpose was described in John 1. But I think I'm repeating myself.
To answer your other question about the days of creation. I'm a fundamentalist, so yes the bible is the truth and describes events that actually happened. Now how those events are interpreted and literally occurred is another matter. Genesis 1 is written the way it is, is on purpose. And if you compare Genesis 1 with Genesis 2, the other creation story you might find some seeming inconsistencies. But you have to analyze and interpret why God would let inconsistencies occur in His Holy Bible. That is because Genesis 1 is written the way it was because of how it needs to be interpreted later. It has to be around 4,000 years before the birth of Christ in order to fulfill phophecy and parallels.
But I know I just said I'm a fundamentalist, how to I get into symbolic interpretation? We know because the bible clearly says that time is different for God than from us humans. That is clear, a thousand years for us is like a day to God. So a day for God, can mean a different time frame for humanity. But again how does a fundamentalist get into such subjective interpretation? And here is how I square the days of creation having some wiggle room with a fundamentalist. We know that a day is measured by the earth rotating on its axis. And a year is the earth's orbit around the sun. How can time be measured for the first 3 days, if the sun, moon and stars were not created until day 4? How can you measure each of the first 3 days of creation, if the measure of time was not created? Read Day 4 specifically, it explicitly says the time of days and years was not created until then.
This will start making sense as I do more videos, biblical prophecy is based on 360 day years, while now we know years are measured by 365.25 days. Why the difference? Because the angels are symbolized by the stars and day 4 in Genesis 1 has dual meaning, so Satan's rebellion with man caused a time difference and distance between us and God. And also why the Anti-Christ is said to try and change the time. I will do a video about this which will prove the theory with mathematics, it is amazing. But that needs to come in time. But just know that this is a real thing, the changing of time, because the Son of God, Jesus Christ, literally changed time Himself. Our whole calendar is based on the life of Jesus Christ. God told Satan, you might try and change time, But I have the ultimate authority on time.
I hope I haven't lost you with this. To come full circle, the 6 days of creation in Genesis 1 are there for bible prophecy and parallels. But I do not see any problems with a fundamentalist interpreting the first 3 days of creation as longer time periods since time for humans was not created until day 4.
I hope I got all your points answered. Thanks for the comments and approach. God Bless
Why 666?
satan tries to obliterate the Lord's Truths given - please read through it .....Shalom.
Yes and amen. Jesus is God. Pay attention listeners... he's only reading The Word. Let The Holy Spirit reveal ti each according to their faith 🙏
Who says God's perfect mark is 777? Where is this Biblically ? Nowhere ! Just man made ! Means Nothing!....old Messianic Jew.
The earth created was water…he made the dry land days later. Also for you to say God created Jesus as Light makes Jesus a created being. I DO NOT AGREE as Jesus Being God wasn’t created but is God.
That was inarticulate on my part. I went through a long discourse of Jesus coming out of God as the Word of God and thus is God. I did not mean to say that Jesus was created, but that the light people say was created on day 1 was Jesus. When you do videos, sometimes you wish you could have take backs for things said you didn't mean. This is one of them. Jesus was not created. He came from God as the Light and the Word of God.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 thank you for clarification. You could o rewrite a Closed Caption on your video. It would help. Bless you and thank you for all your hard work for God! Praying for you.
Is the mark and number the same?
No they aren't, and according to Revelation you can be marked on the hand or the forehead. They won't even happen at the same time. This has been paralleled with God's first Witness, The Jewish People during the Holocaust in WWII. The Jewish people were first marked with the Star of David, and then in the camps received a tattoo mark. This will parallel the mark of the beast, first comes a clothing mark, then later comes a physical mark.
Where in scriptures does it say Hasatan is a fallen angel. I believe it says it is a man. Spirit not physical. The king of Babylon is Hasatan "the Advasary" So Adam in the garden must be a different man than the ones created with their wives.
Add the man who is the bloodline of the Hebrew peoples and this should be fact as we have the genealogies from Christ to Adam who as written was the son of GoD.
The rest of the people are not in this list.
Jew and Gentiles mind you🤔
This would show Hasatan as a man not an Angel!
Also if this is not so..who was Cain afraid of that would kill him?
It is widely accepted that Satan is a fallen angel made by God. In the Book of Job it talks about the sons of God, which includes Satan. Angels would be sons of God, since they were made by God. Just like Adam would be considered a son of God in the genealogy of Jesus because he also was made by God.
In the Book of Ezekiel in chapters 1 and 10, Ezekiel sees a vision of creatures that have different faces. One of the faces the creatures have is of man. And in chapter 10, it confirms that the vision in both chapters is of the same creature which turn out to be cherubim angels. So angels can have the appearance of man.
I didn't follow your train of thought otherwise. Just because someone is not in the bloodline to Jesus does not make a difference in being a son of God. There were lots of God's people that were not in the bloodline to Jesus Christ.
Exodus 13; 9 and Deut 11; 18 "Phylacteries" the Jews wrapped about their heads and their right hand and arm. Right? you know this. The "Marks" of the faithful Jew.
Incense is dispensed with right hand and with your mind you profess. These are the "Characteristics" of worship of the faithful that is aped by Satan, this is the reason for the "marks" on the head and or hand.
Next, Nero's name in Hebrew adds to up to 666 and he demanded incensing in this manner, with the right hand, and professing verbally, with the mind. Under Nero you were unable to participate in commerce. The marks could be the "Character" of the antichrist? Do you see this? maybe a lot of people are approaching this from the wrong angle. Faith is in the mind (prayer) and translated to your hands {work), Faith without works is dead, somewhere in James, hehehe "Ora et Labora" the marks of the faithful, aped by Satan. If you profess sinful things and work to promote those things, YOU HAVE TAKEN THE MARKS OF THE BEAST. If you think it is a barcode or a Vax I believe you are mistaken, like when was the last time you were vaxxed between the eyes. hehehehe
I will do a video about what the mark of the beast will be, I think I know. It will be a literal mark, but fulfilled in a couple different ways. This has already been foreshadowed in history. Think about God's first chosen people, now known as the Jewish people. They are the first witness of God. They faced real persecution in WWII under Hitler and the Holocaust. But think about what you have heard about their history in Germany. They were marked during the time in Germany. First with the Star of David which had them marked as Jews, then when the Holocaust began they were physically marked in the camps with a tattoo. First with clothing and then with a physical mark toward the end and real killing of God's people.
This is how it is going to play out with Christians and the mark of the beast in Revelation. It has been also foreshadowed in the bible as well in Genesis. That will come in time, when I'm ready to do a video on it. Just remember the first mark will be a piece of clothing, then the second will be a physical mark. Now plug that into what you know about where the mark of the beast will be.
These parallels are amazing. God is coordinating an amazing story that keeps happening over and over again. It's like giant clues as to what will happen. Hope this helps, God Bless.
HOW COULD JESUS BE THE LIGHT THAT GOD CREATED ON DAY 1 WHEN ON DAY ONE IT IS TO THE MATERIAL UNIVERSE THAT WAS BEING CREATED? "
"Then Jehovah answered Job out of the windstorm: 2 “Who is this who is obscuring my counsel And speaking without knowledge? 3 Brace yourself, please, like a man; I will question you, and you inform me. 4 Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me, if you think you understand. 5 Who set its measurements, in case you know, Or who stretched a measuring line across it? 6 Into what were its pedestals sunk, Or who laid its cornerstone, 7 When the morning stars joyfully cried out together, And all the sons of God began shouting in applause? Job 38:1-7
WHEN SUCH FACTS CONCERNING CREATION ARE BEING OBSCURED BY THE MAKER OF THIS VIDEO THERE IS A NEED TO HUMBLE ONE'S SELF IN ORDER TO BE TAUGHT BY THOSE WHO THE MASTER HAS APPOINTED (MATTHEW 24:45-47) IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO: "Do your utmost to present yourself approved to God, a workman with nothing to be ashamed of, handling the word of the truth aright." 2 Timothy 2:15 OTHERWISE THESE WORDS OF THE MASTER WILL BE SURE TO OVERTAKE SUCH ONE'S: "“I tell you that men will render an account on Judgment Day for every unprofitable saying that they speak; 37 for by your words you will be declared righteous, and by your words you will be condemned.” Matthew 12:36
I stand behind the theology that Jesus came into being at the first moment when God the Father spoke, "Let there be Light" since Jesus is the Word of God and the Light of the World. And the First and the Last, the Alpha and the Omega. And the only begotten Son of God, since begotten means to come out from. Jesus is God because He came out from God and thus has the essence of God.
Jesus being the light on day 1 fits perfectly since the sun wasn't created until day 4.
@@connectingthebible-deeperb5680 THE SCRIPTURES STAND BEHIND THE FOLLOWING: IN GENESIS 1:2 THE EARTH WAS FORMED/CREATED BEFORE LIGHT CAME TO BE THEREFORE JESUS COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CREATED IN THE LATE PERIOD OF LIGHT COMING INTO EXISTENCE BECAUSE HE WAS USED BY GOD TO BRING FORTH LIGHT INTO EXISTENCE BEING THAT HE ALSO WAS USED IN BRINGING FORTH OTHER SPIRIT CREATURES BEFORE THE MATERIAL UNIVERSE WAS CREATED: “Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: because by means of him all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him and for him.” Colossians 1:15,16
EVEN MORESO, JESUS PLAINLY TELLS US: “To the angel of the congregation in La·o·di·ceʹa write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation by God” Revelation 3:14
AS THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION AND THE IMAGE OF HIS CREATOR
THE LIGHT MENTIONED @ GENESIS 1:2 IS A CREATION THAT GOD USED JESUS TO BRING FORTH: “Therefore, in response Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to you, the Son cannot do a single thing of his own initiative, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever things that One does, these things the Son does also in like manner.” John 5:19
GOD HIMSELF IS ALSO LIGHT AND BEING THAT JESUS WAS MADE IN HIS IMAGE HE TOO WOULD BE LIGHT BUT NOT THE LIGHT THAT WAS CREATED @ GENESIS 1:2 AS THAT LIGHT HAS TO DO WITH MATERIAL LIGHT THAT WE CAN SEE WHILE BOTH GOD AND HIS FIRST CREATION ARE SAID TO BE: “…unapproachable light” 1 Timothy 6:16
THEREFORE SINCE JESUS CREATED THE THINGS IN THE HEAVENS/THE ANGELS THAT WERE CREATED BEFORE THE MATERIAL WORLD WAS CREATED THERE IS NO ROOM FOR HIM TO NEED TO BE RECREATED AS THE LIGHT MENTIONED IN GENESIS 1:2 - AS THAT WOULD MEAN THAT HE COULD NOT HAVE HAD THE EXPERIENCE RELATED TO US @ COLOSSIANS 1:15,16
satan hates the Lord's truths again - please read through his obliteration....Shalom.
Revelation 12:4
Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth.
1÷3=0.333...
So 0.666... is the factor i.e. 'number' of the heavenly host i.e. 'stars' that Satan still wants to subvert or destroy, that he curses from Hell.
1=0.333...×3 but if you think about it=0.999... so really 1=0.333...×2+0.333...4
So the true number of angels that remained was 0.666...7 but Satan would like it to be less so he targets the 0.000...1 which was Jesus as a human.
The need for divine intervention is exposed when one 'wipes away' 0.333... from the whole/holy 1, because then you see how God needs to transform the tiniest 6 into a 7 to complete the trinity. But Satan wants just infinite 6's after the 0. Humans living for humans (6), never seeing God (7) saved the universe by becoming a 6 in order that a 6 might become a 7 unto itself, no longer needing divine intervention.
God saw 1=0.999... and said that it was not good
7 so loved 6 that 7 gave his only son to complete the trinity.
Jesus is NOT God ! How do I know because the Bible says so ! It says He is God's Son & when asked 'when will you return' He said' I do not know no one knows nor does the Son only the Father in Heaven' .....is the Bible a lie , does Jesus lie ....NO!.... your doctrine is false sadly......when the Bible says the Word was made flesh simply means God put His Word into a begotten son with His Authority....maybe hard for you to accept but it is Father , Son & Holy Ghost - the Tri head acting & thinking as one but separate entities.....Maranatha Shalom.....old Messianic Jew.
Jesus was a Jew, and I would think He knew exactly what was implied when He said all those "I am"s. That would not be mistaken by any Jewish person of that time, nor now. On this channel, Jesus Christ is God. The second part of the trinity.
The story of Jesus not knowing the time of His return simply means He is the Word of God, God the Father only knows the time of the end. It has not be spoken yet. That is rather easy to understand and does not deny the divine nature of Jesus.
But shalom to you as well, may you question more so that God can open your eyes.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "Doctrine of the Trinity" came about in the 300's AD at the Council of Nicea, I think. Until then, there wasn't really a unified understanding of the Godhead: I'm guessing a bunch of Cardinals were there and they blended all the various beliefs of the time into this one impossibly complex doctrine, then told us all to accept it by faith. For me, it's handy to know there are at least three ways that the Almighty HAS manifested Himself to us humans. I accept them all; I pray to each according to the function outlined in the New Testament. In Truth, God is too big for us to understand, and the DOCTRINE of the Trinity--or any other doctrine--can't do justice to the Creator. So you're right!
I'm just glad the Cardinals in Nicea didn't include a burning bush in the Trinity. I can imagine some people flocking to a brush fire thinking it was the almighty! But seriously, Wikipedia outlines the Trinity, if it needs to be set down in words. Personally, my teaching is that this doctrine exists whether God is this way or not---and that's all that matters. Worship Him in Spirit and in Truth: I take my doubts to Him daily, and I thank Him in Jesus' name for giving me the conduit of access to Him. I wouldn't know God, if it weren't for Jesus. And I wouldn't be lead to do God's will if not for the Holy Spirit.
Always Seek Him, and he will reveal Himself in His time. All honor and Glory to Him, and blessings to you!
Hey genius, what species were you parents? Were they human? You’re their child. What are you? Are you a turtle, a giraffe, an owl? I’d say you’re probably human. Would God’s son be a badger, a cricket, or would He be God? The Word was God(John 1:1) before He was made flesh(v14).It’s not that complicated!
satan hates the Lord's truths trying to obliterate -please read through it-Shalom.@@mikebrown9850
@@mikebrown9850 When you write to someone in a smart-arse way you clearly lack understanding God's Way - Jesus Christ & therefore HIS Words sadly - we are supposed to mirror HIM -not that I hold myself a great example . The only complication I see is you simply twist God's Words. HE made HIS Son within which you find HIS Words -God's Voice....hope you can lose your attitude .....Shalom....old Messianic Jew
The mark of the beast is symbolism contrast the mark of the Lamb there is know literal mark 🤷✝️🙏
The Bible says if you TAKE it sooò there must be one?
Greed.....Read about Solomon and you will see.