Suburbs - The Hidden Taxes You Pay Every Year

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
  • Taxes. We all hate them. And what if I told you that you have to pay a hidden tax, without even knowing it. In this video, we'll take a look at how suburbanization bleeds you, the city, and the country dry, how precious real estate and property is wasted and how municipal investing into the city can make a noticeable difference.
    We'll also look at potential solutions, like zoning and construction reform, land value taxes like the ones from Henry George, and more.
    sources: docs.google.com/document/d/1u...
    socials:
    Instagram: / thetramly
    Twitter: / thetramly
    USAGE POLICY:
    I release all my videos under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
    That means that if you properly credit me (link in the description will suffice, although I would appreciate if you could credit me right in your work), and you share your work under the same or a compatible (creativecommons.org/share-you...) license as this video, you're free to use it in your work.
    #urbanplanning #strongtowns #publictransport
    0:00 Intro
    1:29 Terrible zoning
    2:51 Cost
    5:15 Bureaucratic hell
    8:37 Potential solutions

Komentáře • 10

  • @Cyrus992
    @Cyrus992 Před 5 měsíci +3

    Modern Car dependent can exist even if the area is dominated by high rises.

    • @TheTramly
      @TheTramly  Před 5 měsíci +3

      That's true, but I'd argue that higher density is key to building a livable city

    •  Před 5 měsíci +3

      It can, but by having mixed zoning and good public transit you reduce the likelihood or the number of people who are dependent.

    • @Cyrus992
      @Cyrus992 Před 5 měsíci

      @@TheTramly overall perhaps

  • @mardiffv.8775
    @mardiffv.8775 Před 5 měsíci +1

    The Dutch have taking your approach of building inside the city and minimum outside the city.
    Amsterdam wants small businesses out and build housing instead. For example: Havenstad (Harbour City).
    Fourth largest city of the Netherlands; Utrecht could not expand inside its borders, so it built the largest suburb of.......wait for the name:.........Vleuten, de Meern, Leidsche Rijn. Which is car orientated, but has public transport as well (3 train station on the Utrecht-the Hague/ Rotterdam line). Also cycling is very much supported with bike infrastructure.
    Parking fee will be implemented in 2025. To much frustration of the NIMBY's. So residents walk and bike more.

    • @TheTramly
      @TheTramly  Před 5 měsíci +1

      That's good, glad the Dutch are being based as always

  • @agness6766
    @agness6766 Před 5 měsíci +1

    I see somebody lives around Háje right?
    And yeah, welcome in Czechia, where building tracks or highway is usually blocked by "děti Země" (children of earth) or other "eco" activist
    (Im activist myself, but for better public transport and better roads)

    • @TheTramly
      @TheTramly  Před 5 měsíci +1

      Yeah, i support saving the environment, but blocking construction really isn't the way

  • @szymex22
    @szymex22 Před 5 měsíci +3

    Interesting video.
    Indeed, Parking minimums are bad,. but the police/state/city also needs to ensure people don't buy apartments without parking, have a car, and keep parking it blocking the sidewalk or doing it on grass.
    In my opinion, the suburbs should grow next to the national railways going out of the city, probably span a kilometer or 2 from the railway. This would make it very easy to provide transit service to them.
    They can also grow in a way that its easy for busses to reach a major transit hub, a metro, tram or train station. But the suburban busses need to be frequent and bike paths would help with coverage.

    • @TheTramly
      @TheTramly  Před 5 měsíci +3

      I agree that parking minumum should be elastic based on location, access to public transport and more, but in the case of the buildings in Háje, I don't see a reason to have a large amount of parking
      sure, a small underground parking lot would be nice, but every resident in those 2 proposed buildings isn't going to own a car
      public transport needs to be frequent, available and cheap, I agree with that as well