Infinite dimensions

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 14. 03. 2019
  • Example of an infinite-dimensional space, and why its dimension is infinity
    Check out my Matrix Algebra playlist: • Matrix Algebra
    Subscribe to my channel: / @drpeyam

Komentáře • 34

  • @gogl0l386
    @gogl0l386 Před 5 lety +42

    The sia sequence is my new favorite sequence.

  • @kostas919
    @kostas919 Před 2 lety +4

    You killed me with the SIA sequence professor 😂😂😂

  • @elsurexiste
    @elsurexiste Před 7 měsíci +2

    Sears' sequence: 😒
    Sia's sequence: 🤩

  • @cobalius
    @cobalius Před 4 lety +9

    Lemme throw some Infinity-sided die for ya
    *throws*
    It seems to be rolling forever :D

  • @sugarfrosted2005
    @sugarfrosted2005 Před 5 lety +8

    Compactness in my linear algebra? It's more likely than you think!

  • @sandorszabo2470
    @sandorszabo2470 Před 5 lety +6

    As an example for infinite dimension I used to mention the set of all (real or complex) one variable polynomials.

  • @Vampianist3
    @Vampianist3 Před 5 lety

    More illustrations on the basis of continuous functions PLEASE!!

  • @rohunse5555
    @rohunse5555 Před 5 lety +4

    First!
    Thank you for making such interesting videos

  • @newtonnewtonnewton1587

    Thanks a gain D peyam its also a nice video

  • @MIRCOR55
    @MIRCOR55 Před 5 lety +1

    R vector space over Q as the field of rationals is also an infinite dimensional vector space. Nice video.

  • @Eden-mn6rt
    @Eden-mn6rt Před 3 lety

    This guy is way too underated

  • @cubicardi8011
    @cubicardi8011 Před 5 lety +6

    1:50 yeah, dot dot dot.​ So let's continue this sequence logically

  • @jadepangwaiho
    @jadepangwaiho Před 5 lety

    Does the thm below is true for infinite-dim vector space?
    "Every vector in a vector space can be written in a unique way as a finite linear combination of the elements in this basis."

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  Před 5 lety +2

      It’s a bit more complicated than that, for example x^2 cannot be written as a finite linear combination of e^(inx), but as an infinite series. There’s something called a Hamel basis, look it up!

  • @112BALAGE112
    @112BALAGE112 Před 5 lety +2

    Can dimension be uncountable?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  Před 5 lety +2

      Mmmmmh, depends on how you define a basis, check out Hamel basis

    • @stydras3380
      @stydras3380 Před 5 lety

      An example from field theory would be the field extension ℝ/ℚ with [ℝ:ℚ]=∞ the same order as |ℝ|. Therfore ℝ can be interpreted as an uncountable infinite dimensional ℚ vectorspace :)

    • @orangeguy5463
      @orangeguy5463 Před 5 lety

      Well the best you can do is prove that any basis could not be listed out because it would lead to a contradiction. You can do this easily with the space of all functions, but continuous functions, differentiable functions, etc are harder as mentioned in the video because you need axiom of choice. Funny enough, the space of analytic functions is countably infinite, which is one of the coolest distinctions between analytic and infinitely differentiable in my opinion.

  • @snuffybox
    @snuffybox Před 9 měsíci

    Does it really make sense to represent a sequence as an infinite dimensional vector? A sequence has an order built into it where the components of a vector do not. No idea if i will get a response on this 4 year old video lol.

  • @etienneparcollet727
    @etienneparcollet727 Před 5 lety +3

    Let R be the set of reals and N of positive integers.
    I don't know if this is a widespread notation but for me R^N is the set of real sequences and R^∞ the set of real sequences that are 0 in a finite number of steps. That means that the family F=(δ_n)_n∈N is free in both vectorial spaces made from R^N and R^∞ yet it is a basis of R^∞ but not of R^N.
    Furthermore I don't think R[X] and (whatever is the notation for the space of power series) are isomorphic, as R^N and R^∞ are not. I'm saying this because even if you can prove there are bases of R^N and (not twice) I don't think - though I could be very wrong on this - that there is an isomorphism between them and bases of R^∞ and R[X].

    • @stydras3380
      @stydras3380 Před 5 lety +1

      By your definition of ℝ^∞, it is not isomorphic to ℝ[[x]] (This would ne the notation for power series over ℝ) but instead ℝ[[x]] would be isomorphic to ℝ^ℕ. You have to remember that we aren't necessarily talking about convergence when we are dealing with the space of power series. In ℝ[[x]] you also have non-convergent series like 1+1x+4x²+27x³ +(...)+ nⁿxⁿ +(...). If you would wan't to talk about converent series you'ld first have to make sure that your set even is a space! For example the set of all convergent power series with a fixed radius of convergence r∈ℝ form a space! But finding a isomorphism to one of those would be more tricky :P

    • @willnewman9783
      @willnewman9783 Před 5 lety

      This is notation that I have seen as well

  • @shandyverdyo7688
    @shandyverdyo7688 Před 5 lety

    Dr. Peyam. Could i be smart like you?
    😌

  • @miloglin8287
    @miloglin8287 Před 4 lety

    where is part when we talk about minecraft

  • @baongocnguyenhong5674
    @baongocnguyenhong5674 Před 5 lety

    well, i understand nothing because i'm Vietnamese.
    but anyway how the hell that this video has lesser views than Baby Shark???

  • @snowflake8235
    @snowflake8235 Před 2 lety

    Love you as a human being and love from India ❤️🇮🇳

  • @shiloranxxer
    @shiloranxxer Před 4 lety

    Minecraft April Fools?