But if O+W = L; if O = a, W = b and O = x; a+b = x; CH = O+W = a+b too, so, the minimum length is always equal to CH?, in that case, the minimum length is just for make a square?
This might be out of the norm for you, but could you show some field fabrication offsets. Like a 3 piece offset where you use like 1/4 the width and double the offset formula? Any information would be greatly appreciated.
So grateful for this content, thank you sir!
But if O+W = L; if O = a, W = b and O = x;
a+b = x; CH = O+W = a+b too, so, the minimum length is always equal to CH?, in that case, the minimum length is just for make a square?
This might be out of the norm for you, but could you show some field fabrication offsets. Like a 3 piece offset where you use like 1/4 the width and double the offset formula? Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Sorry ,I'm not familiar with that rule
What's the reason you just don't use the owl method I mean isn't that how you get the offset I mean all set times with divided by length