UNDERSTANDING CONCEPTUAL ART IS EASY
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- My musings on conceptual art, PR, money, Duchamp, Hirst, Emin, Saatchi, hamparte and more.
За концептуално изкуство, ПР, пари, творци, меценати и нови терминологии.
To see my artwork or get in touch, follow me on social media:
/ boryanakorcheva
/ boryana.art
/ boryanakorcheva
www.boryanakor...
#conceptualart #contemporaryart #hamparte #antoniogarciavillaran #hamparteinenglish #whatishamparte #revolucionhamparte #hamparteeningles #damienhirst #traceyemin #sarahlucas #charlessaatchi #marcelduchamp #artistshit #urinal #fountain #isthisart #tapedbanana #boryanakorcheva #studiodrift
Not gonna lie, your satire pieces at the end were actually way better than most conceptuals u've mentioned
LOL - thank you!
This was brilliant, thank you!
I really love your "post quarantine" piece because in the quarantine, we're all packed up like tinned sardines
This has always been my feeling, I can’t articulate it as well as you, so glad I found this channel
I'm in the process of completing my art degree and it's my first time attempting conceptual art. I've really been hard on myself for not understanding. I really needed to hear this!
This trolling at the end is so hilarious and so creative!
OMG!!! You are truly the best!!! and your conceptual artworks can be sold for huge money!
Not all of it, cheer up! ;)
Brilliant!
Thanks! 😀
You're funny. The tuna can was very funny. I like the explanation. I think of the expressions of others when they speak about the art works, and they make me laugh too. 😅
I actually think the piece about moving rice from one side to the other is very good..! Hamparte is a useful phrase. It allows us to de-categorise these art market types.
An intelligent, charming and insightful lecture... "Bulgarian version"... Adorable... Boriana might come from Gabrovo...
Thank you 😊! Not exactly Gabrovo, but close enough. Good guess! You might know the, that beans stew is the Bulgarian national dish 😄
Hello. I did a lot of research before I got into creating art work. I'm into visual, and audio arts. I create art, photography, and compose music, I am a writer as well. I use my art work on my books, and music album covers. I thought of one day seeing my work on billboards in New York City, but that dream faded quick. My art work is out there as covers for my books, and music albums. I've used my work well without galleries, or advertisements. My art is colorful, and very nice. I'm proud of my work.
thankyou so much for this. i thought i was going mad
Clever and funny 👍
Unbelievable way to expose the subject in question. I’ve just discovered you. I loved this video
Thank you!
Great context - thank you
Hamparte, brilliant concept. We all knew it but were afraid of speak out.
Jajaja… ❤ I loved it… yes, art alive regardless the insanity of the consumer market.
love this very much...👍😁👍
Many thanks! :)
Eclectic and beyond beautiful....if i may say....
Thank you!
Love!!
Haha, your conceptual works would definitely stand out (blend in) in a contemporary exhibition.
I think its fascinating and paradoxical however I wouldn't buy it for myself. Its just fun to be a spectator
You are etic and ecstatic pure harmony
I don't think poetry is a good example of immaterial art that doesn't require skill or technique (it should require those, although indeed it suffers a similar decline to the one you allude to in your discussion of conceptual art). The sound texture of spoken words (on phonological level) as well as the suprasegmental properties of poetic speech (stress, tone, intonation) are the physical material of poetry, just like their equivalents in music, painting, or sculpture. In fact, the raison d'être of poetry was to act as a mnemonic device (long before writing itself was possible) and preserve knowledge often through its physical properties when spoken.
This is the second time I watch this. You are BRILLIANT ! At last someone in the internet with acute criticism.
What world do we live in? What’s this petty game western idiots are playing? For what? What’s the point?
Yes, this is the absurdity capitalism has created.
Thank you for your insightful comment and your appreciation!
Revealing indeed - IB and Terje
Please transport me back to the Renaissance. Hirst, Koons, Emin as professor of drawing at the RA, are there 365 April Fool's days in a year.
I know ... Emin as a professor of drawing at the RA is the one that throws me into dark depression though.
Conceptual art is only about the idea itself (=the art happens in the mind ). Visual aesthetics might distract our minds. Though, I agree that these price tags are counterproductive. Who the heck pays millions for an idea? Hmm? That is also a distraction ( ha-ha).
🌎
I still do my figurative oil paintings I dont care what is trending. but now days art is an insult to people who spent a lifetime perfecting a technique. you are beautiful. love your accent
Thank you!
It’s a shame than you pick and choose certain artists to generalize about conceptual art. Hans Haacke ? Jiri Kovanda ? Mel Bochner ?...
brilliant! as so much in today's world conceptual art follows the 'philosophy' rich & famous.inc. it is so incredibly dull & stupid ... and no, i don't subscribe to the term 'marketing' genius: the endgame is in the marketing, no genius, not even an airy hue of it. thx 4 the video!
¡¡Me encanta!! Como todos tus videos... Por cierto, por si acaso te compraré una de tus obras conceptuales no vaya a ser que te hagas muy muy famosa y yo pierda la oportunidad de decir: "Tengo un Korcheva"
Ojalá! Jajaja!😀
@@artunplugged GENOCIDE OF BEAUTY: CULTURAL MARXISM IN 20th Century ART Movements
Would being interrogated by an AI computer in the ears 24/7 for a year or so make a good conceptual art piece testing human resilience?
and there is also something called dunning kruger effect , many shit artists have this problem hehe
I don't think it's wrong if you hire people to make your idea if the result is good
...it's obvious you're an indifferent outsider, who just wants to share some thought... nothing wrong with it, of course...
These are pretty solid points, and a lot of visual artists are making similar ones, and the reason behind that is that there's so much truth in it. I think we can say that conceptual art is "art", but it is not "visual art", in the same way that music or poetry are "art" but not "visual art". The problem is that conceptual art is assumed to have replaced visual art, and rendered it redundant. It's a separate medium altogether, and most its witty artifacts are rather dull and tedious. As for the philosophical underpinnings, these can be completely discredited, nevertheless we are still supposed to bow before the audacious props that illustrate debunked, fashionable, philosophical arguments.
You might get a kick out of a video I made last month on a very similar topic: czcams.com/video/5o0FKw0DF3o/video.html
heheh or you can call it the art of selling crap is a form of art itself
You didn't understand anything
So... I can do wild shit, create a nice postmodern speech full of bs, and make money out of it?
That ... Sounds like an excellent idea. Thanks!
Ridiculing something you don’t understand does not raise your opinion to brilliance. It’s ironic that you criticize their notion that concept (idea) is preeminent when you clearly think that your opinion (idea) is superior.
Your conceptual art makes me think about a counter cultural contemporary concept art movement that mocks the current money hungry low IQ art world. Making art installations such as these with deep philosophical concepts and introducing them as high level art but is given out for cheap. Over saturating the conceptual contemporary art branch rendering it as a silly joke and on the same time introducing humor and intelligence through satire.
Conceptual art seems like a terrotory open to anyone, as it does not require a particular skill, like drawing or painting and that makes it a fertile soil for all kinds of scams. Than you for your insightful comment!
@@artunplugged there surely is and unfortunately with the “subjectivity” excuse conceptual art does give way to low quality works that even if it provokes the viewer it does not elevate thought in order to enrich people. Thats why I stick to my figurative paintings :)) nice video thank you :)
😂😂😂😂
I appreciate the rumination, but dislike the compartmentalization. I'm not saying I disagree with some points of view (eg Saatchi, the grandmaster of spin, commodifying artists for personal gain), but that happens in EVERY industry and should be expected in EVERY market. However, I respectfully disagree that if philosophers have been doing their job for thousands of years, how dare anyone contribute to fresh perspectives and viewpoints especially since 1917. Ms. Korcheva comes off as alarmingly filled with as much hubris as "The Establishment" she takes a swing at. Because she has a few solid points to make, I don't appreciate the NEED to convince people of her viewpoints... It's too... indicting rather than helpful. I would certainly listen to Ms. Korcheva ruminate further on the subject if she were willing to provide some positives to balance it all... Per say, Ed Ruscha, Kosuth, or maybe she'd like to take a swing at Lorna Simpson. Ms. Korcheva likes to throw a punch, but can she heal a wound?
Thank you for the great comment! I have been waiting for more than a year for someone to challenge me and I appreciate your position.
She's not saying "how dare anyone contribute to fresh perspectives and viewpoints especially since 1917", she's saying that philosophers and poets are doing this, and stuff like Duchamp's "Fountain" doesn't really qualify. Do you consider Jeff Koons a philosopher? I also don't think she has a need to convince people of her viewpoint, but rather an obligation to challenge their being convinced by anti-art hype and marketing. You can throw a punch, but can you take one? Lorna Simpson? You aren't allowed to critique her work unless you have the right biology, so not a good example.
@@artvsmachine3703 My biology, huh? You just lost your argument.
@@vahannahabedian4220 Sorry, you're level of discourse is not worthy of my attention. Muted.
A man with an empty channel, very conceptual
Thank God you are one of the few art people that don’t worship conceptual art. Most of it is total shit. Great video.
the reason garbage is sold as art is because of the media attention and because then people talk about it and big galleries support that and then there is nepotism and vip people with no talent who sell whatever they sign... check this book there are good examples on how art dealers sell : The $12 Million Stuffed Shark: The Curious Economics of Contemporary Art
Thank you for your comment - will do!