ISTQB v4.0 Boundary Value Analysis (BVA) explanation with examples

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 09. 2024

Komentáře • 9

  • @testing1O1
    @testing1O1  Před 9 měsíci

    Register for the course with 1000+ questions and 5 Sample Exams via the link below
    www.udemy.com/course/istqb-foundation-level-ctfl-certification/?referralCode=D4A4926A6A08C8228DB8
    Coupon: 862288EE1AF534CABEA7
    Register for a FREE course via the link below
    www.udemy.com/course/istqb-foundation-level-v4-new/?referralCode=31368F2B5CBF49F3ED48

  • @crissatrapi3933
    @crissatrapi3933 Před 14 dny +1

    This is really the best channel to learn ISTQB Foundation content.

  • @alperaslan.
    @alperaslan. Před měsícem

    I saw the 3-point BVA question on another CZcams channel before and i didn't understand. Now i understand crystal clear :) Amazing video . Congrats and thank you :)))

  • @BlackShadow3591
    @BlackShadow3591 Před 7 měsíci +4

    Regarding the theoretical impossible numbers like for the question at 23:13 with -1 and 101, the question is asking for a BVA Coverage Percentage, if you were to include -1 and 101 in total BVA values, they would only cover 6/14 and expressed as a percentage is 42.86% which is not an option to choose. So we can safely say that -1 and 101 are not included in the answer. Dropping those 2 values they cover 6/12 BVA Values which is 50% exact which is an option to choose from being option A. I think it just takes logical thinking and some logical tweaking to the calculation when looking at the possible answers.
    This is 100% the most informative video on BVA, I had no idea 3 point BVA was this complex as I am only self studying

    • @testing1O1
      @testing1O1  Před 7 měsíci +2

      Hi, in this particular exam sample, answer options can't confuse you, but in the real exam, unfortunately, it is not the case. You may have two answer options, both of which can be correct, depending on whether you include -1 or 0 or not. It is quite a tricky issue with no solution for now

  • @naeliesuttra
    @naeliesuttra Před dnem

    You are a life saver! 🥰

  • @mikhailkhalil3390
    @mikhailkhalil3390 Před měsícem

    Thanks so much for this amazing explanation

    • @testing1O1
      @testing1O1  Před měsícem

      You're welcome, I did my best in these videos)

  • @maiosama4615
    @maiosama4615 Před měsícem

    I guess -1 is ignored in the question because it will be considered as 2 characters, as in the question he specified numbers of characters not specific number