Daniel's Visions: Do They End with GREECE?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 6. 08. 2020
  • When was the Book of Daniel written? One of the key questions that interpreters ask in this regard is, "When do the visions and prophecies end?" Is the final earthly kingdom to rule Greece? Rome? Something else?
    Dating the Book of Daniel is not a simple task, but the consensus view is that it was written in the middle of the second century BCE. For a full video series dealing with the issues surrounding the dating of the book, click here: • The Book of Daniel: PR...
    For the original video (from which this clip was taken), click here: • Part 5: When was the B...
    𒀭Support Digital Hammurabi!𒀭
    Books by Digital Hammurabi Press:
    Learn to Read Sumerian! tinyurl.com/ycdtn8ay
    Did the Old Testament Endorse Slavery? tinyurl.com/yad3e26g
    Learning to Pray in a Dead Language: Education and Invocation in Ancient Mesopotamia (COMING SOON)
    Patreon - bit.ly/2EJVEdj
    PayPal - bit.ly/2PUp49A
    Shirts and Swag - bit.ly/2QKAuSH
    Amazon Wishlist - amzn.to/2CsDhak
    Website - bit.ly/2V0ZaVw
    Twitter - bit.ly/2T6uJLV
    Contact - digitalhammurabi@gmail.com
    ----------
    For general information and sources relating to the Ancient Near East, we recommend these websites:
    ABZU - bit.ly/2Cr1A8u (collection of free and open-access data)
    University of Chicago Oriental Institute - bit.ly/2RcIiMl (great collection of free books and articles)
    Livius.org - bit.ly/2Gzj5rx (general encyclopedia on the ancient world)
    ETCSL - bit.ly/2QJsAZS (Sumerian literature)
    ORACC - bit.ly/2QJsL7u (collection of projects relating to Mesopotamia)
    EPSD - bit.ly/2PY99aw (Online Sumerian dictionary)
    CDLI - cdli.ucla.edu (Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative)
    ----------
    Music: Brak Bnei Original Composition
  • Zábava

Komentáře • 46

  • @y11971alex
    @y11971alex Před 4 lety +18

    I think this might be the best biblical history channel on the entire platform.

    • @danbreeden1801
      @danbreeden1801 Před 4 lety +2

      Me too

    • @danbreeden1801
      @danbreeden1801 Před 4 lety +3

      A wonderful source of bible information from experts instead of fundamentalist fanatics

    • @danbreeden1801
      @danbreeden1801 Před 4 lety +1

      @Joakim von Anka I'm very sorry for saying eurocentric such biases are everywhere I'm not going to say any race and culture are better or worse than any other that would be a value judgment of which I am not qualified to make a judgement we have seen the accomplishments of other civilizations and early man early man was undeniably as creative and as intelligent as modern man

    • @danbreeden1801
      @danbreeden1801 Před 4 lety

      @Joakim von Anka I will no longer. Use such terminology thank you for your response

    • @danbreeden1801
      @danbreeden1801 Před 4 lety

      I agree it's very refreshing to hear this

  • @erimgard3128
    @erimgard3128 Před 3 lety +5

    "an exegesis of these passages, we'd be here all day"
    Yes, please xD

  • @danbreeden1801
    @danbreeden1801 Před 4 lety +4

    Excellent teaching that demonstrate we should treat books of biblical literature as any other literature of mankind throughout history I love this channel

  • @colinrow725
    @colinrow725 Před 4 lety +7

    You guys can't stay away from Daniel can you? That's fine by me because I love it!

    • @unknownx7252
      @unknownx7252 Před 3 lety

      I grew up seventh day adventist, the book of Daniel and revelation are very well studied in the church, adventist believes are based on the 2300 days prophecy of Daniel so as an ex adventist I love this channel.

  • @matiaspereyra9375
    @matiaspereyra9375 Před 4 lety +4

    Man. DH is my jam. Thanks for the efforts guys. You are one of the most honest consistent and informative channels in YT. Your knowledge is a gift

  • @danbreeden5481
    @danbreeden5481 Před 2 lety +1

    I love the series on Daniel and love everything about digital Hammurabi

  • @dustinellerbe4125
    @dustinellerbe4125 Před 4 lety +5

    If these books were written in Alexandria and had access to the Library of Alexandria, post written stories would be an easy task to complete.

    • @mjt532
      @mjt532 Před 4 lety

      Are there scholars who hold this view? Are you suggesting a post-165 BC completion date for the final form of Daniel?

  • @Number0neSon
    @Number0neSon Před 4 lety +13

    *Seventh-day Adventists have left the chat*.

    • @blorkpovud1576
      @blorkpovud1576 Před 4 lety +5

      Thank you for this. I've recently been introduced to this Daniel obsession from an SDA relative.

    • @Number0neSon
      @Number0neSon Před 4 lety +5

      @@blorkpovud1576 Yeah, I hear ya. SDA's are relentless with the Daniel stuff.

    • @fly_8659
      @fly_8659 Před 4 lety +5

      This series has been liberating for me personally! I feel like walking cleanly away from a doom's day cult.

    • @bilalhussein9730
      @bilalhussein9730 Před 4 lety +5

      JWs write letters to Watchtower in fury.

    • @unknownx7252
      @unknownx7252 Před 3 lety +3

      As a former SDA I love this series!

  • @michjefferson77
    @michjefferson77 Před 3 lety +3

    Have you guys done a video on revelations cause I would like to see your perspective on that and other apocalyptic readings?

    • @unknownx7252
      @unknownx7252 Před 3 lety +1

      As a former seventh day Adventist if you can dismantle Daniel, revelation will automatically fall apart but like you I would very much appreciate a dive into revelation by DH.

  • @kalicorrell5026
    @kalicorrell5026 Před 4 lety +4

    Hello! Big fan of your work! I noticed that a year ago there was a video made about homosexuality and whether or not the Book of Leviticus condemned it. This was very interesting to me and I was wondering if more videos on this topic are ever going to be made. If not, do you know of any good resources that I can look at?

  • @bengreen171
    @bengreen171 Před 4 lety +5

    Brilliant as always.

  • @Camilo199
    @Camilo199 Před 2 lety

    Magnificent job. Greetings from Colombia.

  • @user-re5xg4ds6u
    @user-re5xg4ds6u Před 4 lety +2

    Very Interesting , Thanks

  • @Harvyy99
    @Harvyy99 Před 4 lety +2

    Great video! Thanks. Just a question what about Daniel 2? Was this a later edition only because it seems to point towards the Roman Empire

    • @DigitalHammurabi
      @DigitalHammurabi  Před 4 lety +1

      In what way do you see it pointing toward the Roman Empire?

    • @Harvyy99
      @Harvyy99 Před 4 lety +2

      Digital Hammurabi don’t worry it’s probably just my Ex Jehovah’s Witness upbringing. I do believe it ended with the Greek period. It’s just how Daniel 2 talks about the 4 kingdoms and I’d always just put it as Egypt-Persia-Greece-Rome and I guess I’d just thought the ‘division’ it spoke of in the fourth kingdom was speaking of the Jews/Romans. Only difference with me and the JWs is I don’t extrapolate the feet of the statue to mean present times too🙈 so the fourth kingdom was Greece then?

  • @erimgard3128
    @erimgard3128 Před 4 lety +2

    This is relevant to my interests

  • @danbreeden5481
    @danbreeden5481 Před 2 lety

    I would like to see more on challenges to the assumed unity of Isaiah

  • @stuartc9149
    @stuartc9149 Před 4 lety +1

    Great video but what happened to the bibliography?

  • @miguellozano4407
    @miguellozano4407 Před 2 lety

    Question . Do the prince of Greece and prince of Persia in chapter 10
    Have names ? From mythology or enoc type book ? Or are they just angels which don’t have names

  • @claytonweaver2684
    @claytonweaver2684 Před 3 lety

    Hey Dr. Josh, there's a typo at 6:46, should be Daniel 12, not 2.

  • @CelloThe15th
    @CelloThe15th Před rokem

    I have an issue with this: You didn't even mention the decree/word to rebuild jerusalem. Wouldn't that effect the timeline? Maybe I am misunderstanding, and I still don't believe in the prophecy, but I could really use a response DH

    • @DigitalHammurabi
      @DigitalHammurabi  Před rokem +2

      Good question! If I were to say that I set a timer, and I told four different people about when it would go off in the following way:
      1) before the great fire descends
      2) just prior to the bright white giant appears in the sky
      3) they will not yet slumber from the day
      4) their final meal enjoyed, but rest had not yet come…
      you would likely conclude that the timer will go off very near but still before nightfall (sun going down, moon’s appearance, sleep for the night, after dinner, but before bed). If you then heard me say something that could be interpreted as me saying that the timer wouldn’t go off until the following morning, you would either have to conclude that I made a mistake in what I said, or that you misunderstood me. That’s what’s going on here. If all visions end with Greece, it doesn’t matter if another data point could suggest a time later than that. All say (sometimes very specifically) that the final kingdom to rule before the coming of God’s kingdom is Greece.

    • @CelloThe15th
      @CelloThe15th Před rokem

      @@DigitalHammurabi Thank you for replying! I am still a little uncertain, but this helps

    • @CelloThe15th
      @CelloThe15th Před rokem

      @@DigitalHammurabi Actually, I know its been done to death, but do you think you could do a video refuting claims of daniel 9 predicting Jesus?

  • @דניאל1234
    @דניאל1234 Před 4 lety

    Hello. I just wanted to comment that I deleted my first comment in the video "Assyriology Today June 2020
    ". I just felt bad about it and needed to say it.

  • @drewjohnson4811
    @drewjohnson4811 Před 3 lety +2

    This is a very bad approach. It's almost feels like you know those chapters don't end in Greece. This approach only works if you leave out all the details in the chapter. It's like saying a dog is the same as an elephant since they both have a tail and ears. All the details lead to a completely different conclusion. You have to take the exegesis head-on and deal with where it leads.
    Ch.2, Ch.7, Ch.9, and Ch.11 all end in Rome. Ch. 12 is Rome exclusively.

    • @unknownx7252
      @unknownx7252 Před 3 lety

      As a former Adventist I would like to see that done, I use to research this stuff in my younger days, if I get to the point financially, I will definitely do more research on that. You're right, it doesn't end with the Greeks but DH is right the further you go beyond chapter eleven and twelve it gets muddied. Adventist also believes it gets into Rome and the Roman catholic church and the pope, who bears the number 666.

    • @drewjohnson4811
      @drewjohnson4811 Před 3 lety

      @@unknownx7252
      Seems they don't even entertain Rome as an option since it would require that Daniel wrote prophetically. If they would evaluate Rome, it's clear the eleven rulers in ch. 7 run from Pompey to Vespasian and the First Jewish Roman War. The war is the conflict/tribulation in ch. 2,7, and 12 consistent with the New Testament. The Roman rulers are also ch 11:36-45.

    • @histreeonics7770
      @histreeonics7770 Před 3 lety +1

      @@drewjohnson4811 Perhaps Rome is not considered because it doesn't particularly well fit the (supposed) prophecy while Greece does. It is not at all clear to me that the ninth ruler of Rome is actually the 11th, and why pick Vespasian as the somehow 11th? Your theory is quite contrived.

    • @drewjohnson4811
      @drewjohnson4811 Před 3 lety

      @@histreeonics7770
      Greece doesn't fit very well. Holding the view that Greece is the 4th kingdom requires three contrivances.
      1. Media conquers Babylon first then Persia. The Greek view requires Media to be the second kingdom. Media had been under Persian control for 11 years prior to the fall of Babylon. They'll say Daniel views it that way, but he doesn't. Over and over he treats them as one ruling entity.
      2. Run the divisions of Daniel's 70 weeks concurrently to force them to fall in the Greek empire - Nothing in the text warrants that especially when we're given the total number of years.
      3. Ignore 11:36 - 12:13, 2:44, 7:13-14,27 - They say Daniel was a failed prophet in predicting the kingdom.
      4. Ignore the introduction of Kittim in ch. 11. Throughout that chapter, Daniel introduces and intersection of the preceding and succeeding kingdoms then moves on to the next. The introduction of Kittim is the note that he's shifting to them in the verses that follow.
      He isn't counting emperors the way we think today. He's looking at when Judah came under Roman dominion from Pompey forward in 63 BC. Compare Daniel 11:41 to Pompey's annexation of Judah.

    • @Greyz174
      @Greyz174 Před rokem +2

      ​@@drewjohnson4811 mentioning Rome's interference with Antiochus's plans does not mean that the focus of the prophecy shifted over to Rome and that going forward the king of the north is Roman. Why would it?