ACEBEAM X75 70.3 HI vs 70.2 - MOST POWERFUL ACEBEAM BATTLE! [BEAMSHOTS]
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 07. 2024
- You can find here recent and one most powerful Acebeam flashlight comparison - X75 with new XHP70.3 HI vs famous XHP70.2- overview and tons of beamshots on various ranges from close to long range.
You can purchase Acebeam X75 with 10% discount code: PTECH10 and using my affiliate link you're supporting my channel: www.acebeam.com/?affiliate=pr... - thanks! 💪
If you appreciate my work, you can buy me a coffe! Here it is: www.buymeacoffee.com/protechtevs - with that fuel I'll keep creating!
Acebeam X75 features:
1) 80 000/67 000 lumens max output.
2) USB Type-C PD60W fast charging (Standard); 1.5 hours for full charging. Also can compatible PD100W fast charging(Max); 1 hour for full charging.
3) Built-in dual intelligent temperature regulation systems.
4) Intelligent cooling fan and Intelligent thermal control module.
5) User replaceable, user replaceable and waterproof cooling fan(IP68).
6) Can set the Windy mode or Non-wind mode.
7) Up to 98% high efficient constant current circuit.
8) Momentary Turbo activation rapidly responds to emergency situations.
9) Pure copper heat dissipation piece for high efficient heat dissipation.
10) Color-changing silicone sleeve monitors the temperature of the flashlight and protects for anti-impact.
11) Patented mechanical safe lock - No accidental activation.
12) IP68 standard waterproof
CHAPTERS:
0:00 INTRO/OVERVIEW
0:45 TURBO BEHAVIOUR
1:01 WHITE WALL TEST
2:05 BEAMSHOTS
2:09 280m
2:24 190m
4:19 510m [FOG]
4:51 400 - 600m [FOG]
5:28 3rd PERSON FLOOD TEST
6:44 CLOSE RANGE
7:19 VARIOUS RANGE
music: SONG FOR MICHAEL - MAGIC IN THE OTHER - Věda a technologie
![[4K] Imalent SR16, Acebeam X75, Manker MK38 - long range comparison! [BEAMSHOTS]](/img/n.gif)
first and foremost Great job on showing off the monster lights. you do a great job with your production. I just picked up the 70.3 on Amazon for a super deal. For $344.34. Which save me close to $150 in savings. I had to go with the 70.3 I like the longer throw.
Just looked to me as if the .3 gives you a little bit more of a beam at the cost of a little bit of flood. If I had to pick one I would have to go with the .2 however because those buying this light would be doing so for flood light purposes. If you want a thrower there are much better options.
for me both are excellent. the 70.3 CHI is more Throw but it doesn't change much and anyway it has much less Lumen. As a 70.2 owner I am very happy to have it
Any problems with your x75? My x50 v2 stopped charging.
my both X50 and X75 are doing well, while I'm using them very often in my work.
@@israelquezada0454 Try to make a RESET
This is what I waiting for
The domed LED cause more flood, but are also more efficient, do heat less, are more robust and have a longer lifetime.
I wouldn't seek throw from a flood light. Impressive flashlight under all accounts, the X75 is one of kind...
loving my 5000k version, it was reviewed by "Piercing The Darkness" then sold to me🙂, i used to think sofirn Q8's were great, and skyray kings before them, but this thing is a whole new world by comparison.
Hello, I have a Q8 Plus with Molicels P45B, would you say that its worth getting the X75? Originally I wanted to get either the MS18 or MS12 Mini, then came across X75 with much better functionality. My only concern is the proprietary battery pack which I forsee to be a cost burden in the long run compared to non proprietary design. It is nice to know also that X75 does have the highest holding lumens in the market currently. Cheers ..
@@jumpstat Like all torches, it depends if you have a use for its features. i have the original q8's (5000lm)not plus models, but the x75 is like using 10 or more of those at once to get similar spread. range is better as well, but nothing like the range you get with focused hotspot style torches, which have the downside of lack of spread.
For me the main down side is the torches handle, which makes it too big to fit in my coat pockets easily, when not in use.
@@Retiredkiwi Thanks for your opinion, appreciate it. Cheers.
Loving the music and either of these would make it a good SAR light
Beautiful detailed review! Thank You 🙏. New Subscriber here! 🙋♂️. I just ordered the 70.3 thanks to your review. I like a little more throw than flood so I can reach out & see farther if I need to but have plenty of flood also. Best of Both World’s 🌎 in my humble opinion
thank you for the kinds words! I hope you will find more helping content here in future ✌️
.3 Win for me, it's just brighter. I didn't buy the Micro Arc since I saw a video where it has chipped and flaked, that's just unacceptable. In a pocket with keys, etc and it chips and flakes off? Give me a break. Yes , .3 clearly for the Win.
I own a x65 time to upgrade i guess im gonna go with .3 instead cuz of run time plus once it get over certain lumens limits its hard to till which is brighter but the throw is way way better. You getting a sub from me
Thanks for this great Video review, really good shots from different perspectives, its like a new level on your channel, nice job with that 👍
For me its clear that the 70.3 is the winner, because of the better balancend beam profile with more reach and less self-blinding in closer range, although both lights are in the pretty ugly cold white low cri 6500k CCT tint. The X75 is a good developed light from Acebeam, but hopefully the major brands will concentrate more on beam quality, CRI and tint, instead of max numbers of total lumen output.
Maybe they will see your vids and read this feedback.
Greetings from BLF 😉
thanks for this comment, it's a pleasure! ⚡️
I'm happy that you noticed those 2 major things that are the advantages of throwy LEDs. Personally - I would even like to see SFT40 set up there, regarding of CRI, I'm just a fan of well balanced throwy beam profile.
According to CRI - check out my X50 2.0 CRI version with GT-FC40 4500K :) It's very nice flashlight, but unfortunately it's not that advanced as X75, but I doubt Acebeam will but those LEDs in the new model, there are not much people seeking for CRI out there. But who knows... 🤞😁
Nauh I prefer 6500K. 5000K look shit.
on my video both 70.3 HI and 70.2 are COLD WHITE, but here 70.2 looks like neutral in comparison to 70.3 HI
@@protechteus looks like the 70.3 is close to 7000K
i thought it was the 5000k version😅
Just received my white x75 70.3. Nice and well built light. Like the 70.3 better.
Me too I picked mine up in black. I got a great deal at $344 for it on eBay.
I've heard and seen the Micro Arc Chipping and Flaking. Any thought?
MAO is sensitive, while black anode is hard. Imo MAO is for collecting, black is for using.
@@protechteus It's true. Thanks for your reply!
Я ещё больше запутался. Они оба прекрасны
такаяже фигня не знаю какой покупать
Great video. Which one better. ?
I prefer XHP70.3 HI
How do I apply the coupon code?? There’s no entry for discount code when I try to checkout
you need to go through link www.acebeam.com/?affiliate=protechteus, add X75 to cart and directly in cart type PTECH10 in the discount code area down there - it should work, tested it while ago 👌
If you were to get the brightest torch at this moment would you still pick the x75? Looking at the acebeam x75 70.3 micro arc.
when it comes to flooder - yes, I do
@protechteus says 1306m for the 70.3 which is plenty for me.
what is the best
xhp 70.2
or
xhp 70.3
for me XHP70.3 is winner here
@@protechteus "I had both and I left myself 70.3 HI - today I regret my choice and I would like to have 70.2. Both are having impressive throw, almost the same for an eye, while 70.2 shines much wider on the borders and runs turbo longer." ???
Great video, I'd love to see the xhp70.3 go head to head with the imalent sr16........ That's where I'm stuck, I can't decide on which to buy next as FLASHAHOLIC on CZcams reckons the imalent Sr16 is the best light that's been made this year
I already purchased SR16 and I'll do comparison ofc, but what I can tell you is that X75 will be more floodier than SR16 and X75 will have better runtimes with higher amount of lumens
@@protechteus awesome, thank you... Can't wait, which do you think is the best out of the 3?👍🏼😎
I wish to have X75 with XHP50.3 HI 😁
Which is better imalent sr16 or acebeam x75?
SR16 is more like a thrower, while X75 is flooder and Acebeam has better heat control
My monster has arrived 70.3 dammit I am so excited😊
If you could choose between the 70.2 5000k and 70.3 6500k which one?
6500K
@@protechteus Thanks. But why? People say the 5000k is better for working under a flood because it’s less offensive to the eyes and shows coloring more naturally.
for me it all yellowish, like a pee on a snow
@@protechteus Ok thanks. And you think the extra throw is worth it on the 70.3 vs the 70.2? They both flood big, so does that extra throw even matter?
@@LoinclothRising I had both and I left myself 70.3 HI - today I regret my choice and I would like to have 70.2. Both are having impressive throw, almost the same for an eye, while 70.2 shines much wider on the borders and runs turbo longer.
preferisco xhp70.2
Please review x75 5000k
I wish
Neither... Can't do 6500k for outdoor lights... Ugly... My choice 70.2 at 5000k.
noo! 5000K in XHP70.2 is ugly 🙈CW version here reacheas 5600-5800K irl