Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Attribution Theory (Examples and What it is)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 08. 2024
  • Learn more about Attribution Theory on my blog! practicalpie.com/attribution-...
    Enroll in my 30 Day Brain Bootcamp: practicalpie.com/30-day-brain...
    -- Invest in yourself and support this channel! --
    ❤️ Psychology of Attraction: practicalpie.com/POA
    ⏰ Psychology of Productivity: practicalpie.com/psychology-o...
    💵 Psychology of Selling: practicalpie.com/psychology-o...
    🧠My Mastermind (Free $20 your first month): practicalpie.com/practical-gr...
    💸 Enroll in CopywritingKIT and master persuasive writing today: practicalpie.com/copywritingkit/

Komentáře • 59

  • @randywa
    @randywa Před 3 lety +171

    The common example I hear in Psychology class is: if someone gets cuts in front of you while driving, you assume their just a jerk or a an idiot, but if you do it to someone else, you think about your external situation like how you’re late for work or how your loved one has been hospitalized.

  • @anthraxmilkshake5876
    @anthraxmilkshake5876 Před 3 lety +48

    The low and high of consistency are supposed to be the inverse of consensus and distinctiveness with regard to internal vs external attribution. It isn't low, low, low that indicates internal attribution, but rather low, low, high.

    • @theviper3581
      @theviper3581 Před rokem +3

      yeah I noticed he made an error

    • @tristessa771
      @tristessa771 Před 6 měsíci +3

      Thank you! I was like, that doesn't make any sense.

  • @yashaswinib.836
    @yashaswinib.836 Před 2 lety +68

    I enjoyed the video. Educational! there's an error though: you said when all three low- it's the personality. and all three high it's external events. That's incorrect. When consensus and distinctiveness are low but consistency high- then it's attributed to internal factors. And when consensus and distinctiveness are high but consistency is low- then it's attributed to external factors.

  • @cyborgzulu2011
    @cyborgzulu2011 Před 2 lety +20

    Wanna say thank you very much. Needed this. Our textbook is not great at explaining things. Plus I learn more visually, thanks so much! Your drawings really helped me.

  • @shaunsfx3845
    @shaunsfx3845 Před 3 lety +36

    “Humans are meaning, making creatures” - The most used line by Practical Psychology

  • @kribook
    @kribook Před 12 hodinami

    I realized how I always caught myself thinking of my intentions whenever I do something out of the ordinary, but when I change my perspective to that of the people observing me, I knew I would’ve thought something completely different. Glad to understand more of this thought process in this video. Thanks for uploading!

  • @allanholmes5787
    @allanholmes5787 Před 3 lety +8

    This is GREAT ! No rubbish background music just very good content well present Bravo : )

  • @bonnett5463
    @bonnett5463 Před 3 lety +3

    I love the way this channel, PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY explains the material; AND, I love the material ❗

  • @GrowthMindsetChannel
    @GrowthMindsetChannel Před 3 lety

    So close to 2 mill subs dude, you’re smashing it 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻

  • @hadeebabazaz9360
    @hadeebabazaz9360 Před 2 lety

    I would like to add on a suggestion. Your presentation, the way things are drawn are pretty well. It overshadows what is being said. It grabs the attention of the listener and becomes the focus, whereas what you are saying is meant to he understood

  • @jazzybee.
    @jazzybee. Před 2 lety +7

    If consistency is high, isn't it an internal attribution?

  • @danaking7483
    @danaking7483 Před 4 měsíci

    Interesting information. Thank you for sharing

  • @worldofpsychology5209
    @worldofpsychology5209 Před 3 lety

    Your videos are very helpful

  • @rumbidzaimadzokere4518
    @rumbidzaimadzokere4518 Před 2 měsíci

    Thank you so.much now i understand attribution ❤

  • @bisschenkonstruktiv
    @bisschenkonstruktiv Před 3 lety +10

    At 5:05 , why would low consistency make me conclude that "That is just who they are"? I feel like if a person behaves consistently, then you would say that is who they are

    • @nehamotwani6477
      @nehamotwani6477 Před 3 lety +1

      Yes, i noticed that too. In consistency only the attribution should be different than the other too. I think it should be named as inconsistency factor, then it will be same in all three.

  • @simonemiller9359
    @simonemiller9359 Před 5 měsíci

    Which I could give the video more than one like. Thank you

  • @vinaysuryavanshi1964
    @vinaysuryavanshi1964 Před 2 lety

    Thanks for ur explanation

  • @qualia_
    @qualia_ Před 3 lety +1

    You deserve more views..

  • @Exodus26.13Pi
    @Exodus26.13Pi Před 3 lety

    This's the best method.

  • @ImprovementUniversity
    @ImprovementUniversity Před 3 lety +8

    Awesome content as always. Keep making these highly educational videos. In fact I have a similar video in my channel, what a coincidence 😉.

  • @cache5363
    @cache5363 Před 2 lety +8

    I think the high and low consistency explanations were swapped, but otherwise great video!

  • @tomhawksley360
    @tomhawksley360 Před rokem

    Thank you very much!

  • @tanyaupadhyay5365
    @tanyaupadhyay5365 Před 2 lety

    Good one !

  • @user-px7hp2pb4h
    @user-px7hp2pb4h Před 3 lety +3

    谢谢分享!

  • @Elfos64
    @Elfos64 Před 3 lety

    Think you could go into more detail on misattribution in another video?

  • @user-lb1uw3hw5z
    @user-lb1uw3hw5z Před 3 lety

    is situational the same as disounting?????

  • @asokasamarajeewa9020
    @asokasamarajeewa9020 Před 2 lety

    what is the major attributes transmitted among the youth through social media?

  • @goransimon8711
    @goransimon8711 Před 3 lety +5

    wait, so if the friends doesn't order an expensive wine frequently its personality? Not the sutuation? If it was the personality, would't he always do it? Still, great vid! :)

    • @jayshoenhair9825
      @jayshoenhair9825 Před 2 lety +1

      Agreed.. I think they may have fumbled the details a bit..

  • @Mr_Candid
    @Mr_Candid Před rokem +1

    I have a small doubt that distinctiveness and consistency look somewhat similar. Can anyone explain to me the difference in brief

    • @elena628
      @elena628 Před 6 měsíci

      Consistency would be same action in same environment and distinctiveness would relate to the specific characteristic that is shown - in this case enjoys the finer things in life - does the person showcase that characteristic in different environments?
      I think this is the difference but I'm not sure I am currently learning

  • @AH-zo1nn
    @AH-zo1nn Před 3 lety +3

    Off topic... i miss the nice background music u used to use. The one you used in the self love videos.

  • @amiradel6274
    @amiradel6274 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks for this amazing explanation, I would ask about Rubicon model and theory of planned behavior, I need explanation about theme because I found hardly to understand

  • @scottthomas5819
    @scottthomas5819 Před rokem

    Yes

  • @-_-SpongeBob
    @-_-SpongeBob Před 3 lety +2

    I miss that background guitar music

  • @ayakorpearl1581
    @ayakorpearl1581 Před 8 měsíci

    Can someone please explain the distinctiveness more to me?

  • @thetinkertech
    @thetinkertech Před 2 lety

    This technique of hand and drawing .... How can one make videos using this animation style?

  • @rishiaman2288
    @rishiaman2288 Před 3 lety

    hmm

  • @user-vn7ce5ig1z
    @user-vn7ce5ig1z Před 3 lety

    (Gestalt = /gesht-alt/ not /jesst-alt/)

  • @mdzcfd
    @mdzcfd Před 3 lety

    is this Primink? Is this what you been doing?

  • @AryaStark47
    @AryaStark47 Před 3 lety +1

    Girl 1: so brave 💙💙
    Girl 2: punk
    Me: bird person.

  • @1000nanomech
    @1000nanomech Před 3 lety

    Are you copying the course from Dr. Andrew, all your videos recently seem from his course

  • @ArcWelder588
    @ArcWelder588 Před 3 lety

    Somewhere in here we can find the answers to racism

  • @jayshoenhair9825
    @jayshoenhair9825 Před 2 lety

    The example in this video does not make sense.

  • @sahilahmed8904
    @sahilahmed8904 Před 3 lety

    2nd😌

  • @magzpolt4848
    @magzpolt4848 Před 3 lety

    i dont like champagne

  • @urbaradhikari1539
    @urbaradhikari1539 Před 2 lety

    social
    psychological
    corporate
    political
    family
    😎

  • @kayleighdw
    @kayleighdw Před 6 měsíci

    Wow you explained it so well!! Thank you