A Smarter Automatic Door
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- "Development of Intelligent Automatic Door System," by Daiki Nishida, Kumiko Tsuzura, Shunsuke Kudoh, Kazuo Takai, Tatsuhiro Momodori, Norihiro Asada, Toshihiro Mori, Takashi Suehiro, and Tetsuo Tomizawa from The University of Electro-Communications, and Hokuyo Automatic Co., was presented at ICRA 2014. Learn more: spectrum.ieee.o...
Simple things like this can make a big difference in energy consumption in heating and cooling. Great job guys. Look forward to seeing these pop up.
Nice. We submitted a patent on a very similar idea several years ago. Unfortunately, our company moved away from access control so we won't be putting it into our products. Nice to see that someone else is.
Mate I am happy to work with you to bring the product up please contact me m.technician@hotmail.com
very good and quality invention to make "door entering and exiting" phenomenon more humanly useable
Very nice!
I'll cut and paste my Gizmodo comments:
Automatic door installer & salesman here.
Until people stop suing big, liquid cash stores for their own lack of common sense, these sensors will never be allowed here. All automatic door manufacturers (in the states) got together and created AAADM or the Association of American Automatic Door Manufacturers. A couple key points: the door leaf cannot open faster than 1' per second. Two: when they do bump someone they must react in different ways: in its open cycle it must stall, in its close cycle it must return to open. Three: if only one type of activation sensor (such as microwave) is used, other infrared sensors must take up the slack of loss of motion.
I deal with this daily. While it sounds cool, there is a whole list of reasons they are not available already. Most, if not all, start with dollar signs, and end with the customer is always in the right. Just read the comments here in no particular order:
"i walk into the door and it breaks open." Yes, yes it does. At 50lbs of force from the lead edge actually. Because you walk into the door. Alot.
"They open too slow." Yes, Yes they do. Read reason one.
"i like the old mats" They didn't differentiate between open and close cycles.
"i'm tall and they don't open fast enough." beacuse regualr size people walk at 4' per second. a 12' bipart (divided by 4 panels) requires 3 seconds to open. therefore the sensor must pick an average person up 12' away to be fully open when you get to it. if you're taller, therefore walk farther, faster, we'd have to extend the length of sensor pickup taller, therefore further and sidewalk/heat loss/design issues.
Put it this way: if no one sued, closed the door behind themselves and took responsibility for walking into things, i wouldn't have a job.
How about now 8 years later?
That looks cool. Will read the paper when I get some time.
Star trek doors!
do you have to walk like a robot for it to work? lol
but what if you come in from the side and wants to exit?
That's what I was hoping to see: condition person walking by takes sharp turn.
I like how they're walking like NPC's
Ah, but what if you approach the door by the side (in the way the the passerby in blue was walking) and then turn to enter the door?
Start a dance party at the door. Freaks out the door.
Very innovative
this is just overkill
I can see a few problems arising using algorithms to open doors. Such as the handicapped, children, those carrying large objects, etc. Or say there's a fire and the algorithms get a bug in it causing people to be trapped.
No reason those conditions couldn't be accounted for. I think the primary factor would be a visible face. Maybe when you wrote this comment 7 years ago, this wasn't as obvious.
As for fire, the door should have a manual override, or set fault condition to open.
@@mokahless how is this video supposedly 3 years old but has an 8 year old comment?
Very nice
Boy won't this come in handy for someone robbing a convenience store!