Scientists Reveal That Jupiter Is Not What We're Beeing Told
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 06. 2023
- Scientists Reveal That Jupiter Is Not What We're Beeing Told
► Subscribe: goo.gl/r5jd1F
In the vast reaches of our solar system, Jupiter reigns supreme as a gigantic mystery, captivating scientists and astronomers for centuries.
Just when we think we understand the gas giant, this celestial behemoth shatters our assumptions. With its blend of unpredictable and often hostile behavior, mesmerizing storms with winds of up to 640 kilometers per hour [400 miles per hour] and the enshrouded mysteries of concealed metallic oceans within its core, Jupiter still leaves scientists puzzled.
Join us on an extraordinary journey as we delve into the depths of this enigmatic world, uncovering its secrets.
We are on social media:
destinymediaa
destiny.media.yt
The Destiny voice:
www.TomsVoiceovers.co.uk
Sourses: pastebin.com/raw/7APHRjF1
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
So in summary, Jupiter is exactly what we've been told...
Except no, because science is always changing. In the 70s, we learned that the estimated pressure "on" Jupiter would be 8+G.
@@troydepauw5117
So in summary, Jupiter is exactly what we've been told...
indeed except the astroid belt on that, this docu is wrong for the rest its the same story jada jada if i haven't seen it with my eye's i don't believe stuff so xD
@@palupl lol Yeah always take things with a pinch of salt as they say
I’m not even going to bother watching the video now.
The idea that our solar system is as stable as it is, with all the various gravitational forces and the fact that the whole thing is itself in motion, is just mind blowing, isn’t it?
Yes it is
Lol lots of time to get all the hissy fits out of the way! A few billion years ago this bish was a shooting gallery!
And yet not as stable as we thought
@@drewmadenew3000good point 👉
Well, it has had Billions of years to become stable. Eventually with enough time things tend to stabilise and even out. All energy moves towards a state of decay, the more energy that is "Lost" or more accurately dispersed outwards the more stable things become.
So... Jupiter is pretty much exactly what I've always been told.
So I can go ahead and dislike it without watching?
I remember taking an astronomy class years ago, and my instructor mentioning that the sun undergoes a heightened level of activity every 11 years. I mentioned that Jupiter’s orbit is also 11 years. I always wondered if there was more to that connection….
I suppose it wouldn’t be too difficult to see if they correspond in some way.
Sun's 11 year cycle is shaped by the gravitational pull of Venus, Earth, and Jupiter. I just pulled it from Google, so take it with a grain of salt probably
Well there's a possibility that Jupiter was supposed to become a star and make a binary star system with the sun.. it wasn't quite big enough so it never fully developed into a star.
On another note, the moon is a quarter of the size of earth and it creates tides.. it's not hard to jump to the thought that it may be the same with Jupiter and the other planets
it's rather 12 years orbit
@@sethbieber5127 Agree, both Jupiter and the Sun would exert tidal forces upon each other. There is some theory and belief that tidal forces are partially responsible for being the final feather in the stacking of various tectonic plate forces that can set off earthquakes and the releasing of tension in the Earth's crusts as it flexes the earth's crust & either causes increase or decrease of the compressive forces between the tectonic plates. Keep in mind that it is not just the moon that causes tidal forces on Earth, but the Sun & Jupiter will have smaller tidal contributions, but larger when an alignment of planets, sun, & the moon happen in various adding & subtracting configurations to net together their individual contributions to the total tidal effect. Understanding this, and since most planetary orbits around the sun are not perfectly circular, but more elliptical with a point of closest approach once per orbit, it is not a far stretch to believe that Jupiter could have some partial contribution to the Sun's cycles.
That last point about the barycenter between Jupiter and The Sun mesmerized me. I never had though or considered that Jupiter was NOT actually orbiting the sun, but both of them are orbiting around a pint in the space OUTSIDE the sun. That is amazing.
Whats crazy to think about as well with the beginning of the solar solar system, Had saturn been ejected or not existed where it was , Jupiter would most likely be where venus is and us, who knows. Crazy how saturn was enough to pull it back out and is technically the hidden MVP of all life.
They don't focus enough on Earth or Space in school they want you to know more about dead guys which is why i took last semester so i could take Astronomy at the planetarium Those dead guys in history arn't really of help to us now days XD I did mostly Art and Science in Highschool and JA Government and ecnomics. more important to me then history I can learn that in free time if i want.
@@okidokidraws I like the way you think!
@@okidokidraws a bunch of dead guys who were rarely brought anything, but death & oppression. Then the curriculum makes it seem like they were greater than they actually were.
@@okidokidraws Students are too innocent to be taught about politics
So how is it we really don't know anything about jupiter but then they turn around and tell us what planets are like light years away from us?
Everything they say about planets outside our solar system are extreme extrapolations from very little data. Like details in the spectra from the little light they can catch that move from their sun through their atmosphere. Wild guesses basically.
Don't know anything? Watch the video again.
@@LordTalaxoof
@@LordTalax
No.*
*for more information reread this message
When I was young I always had an issue with envisioning "gas giants" because I would only think of gases in their vapor forms and forget that gases can be condensed into liquids, then realizing it takes absurd amounts of temperature and pressure especially when you consider it's happening just all around as opposed to only being in controlled containers on our planet.
Space is So interesting.😄👍
Yeah, as a kid, I never understood that either. It wasn't until early college I realized what you just said.
I never would have guessed that Jupiter's gravitational influence compared to the Sun could be so massive. The fact that their shared gravitational center is way out where this video listed it as astounds me.
well she is still big even though small compared to the sun and thus she still has immense gravity due to that mass make's you wonder how much mass she is missing to become a small star from the commencement of fusion processes like the sun has that would be fun to find out if we could fire asteroids and comets at her till it started to occur we could learn a lot from doing that one to Jupiter since she is the largest gas giant in the system
@@raven4k998 or we would die from a star so close......ever though of that
@@raven4k998 Wouldn't Jupiter become a brown dwarf before a star?
@@bladerj I think Jupiter is like 2/3rds of the solar systems mass. (edit: not including the sun ofc) so we could only increase it's mass by about 50% if we there everything including earth into it. To become a brown dwarf Jupiter would need 75 times it's current mass. (per google search, but regardless, I'm sure that a 50% increase wouldn't do it.)
Wait, so Jupiter is not a big huge gas giant made of a soup of gasses and metals both gaseous and liquified, with up to 95 moons, that basically protects our solar system from the dangers of space? This I have to see.
😂😂
Up close and personal ?
@@dimensionexo. Very up-close and personal.
@@Oshaoxin - 😹
One of those moons may have life in them.
The best example in the Solar System to describe the barycenter is Pluto and its moon Charon.
Charon is far closer mass wise to Pluto compared to the Sun and Jupiter.
So its barycenter is quite far outside of Pluto.
Another fun fact. Pluto and Charon both have a rotation of 6.4 days. And they also orbit each others barycenter in 6.4 days.
Which means that from Pluto you can only see Charon in certain locations and its always in the same place in the sky as well.
That’s wild.
So are we living in a simulation or not??
My mind is so blown right now....I feel like such a tiny dust particle!!!!!
Will this pay my rent?
And Pluto is a planet!!!
Interesting all together and that's the first time I've actually been enlightened on the fact that Jupiter and the Sun actually share a different orbit than all/most other planets in our solar system. It makes total sense that Jupiter, having the mass it does, that it would act the way it does with the sun. And then, you can assume actually, everything else moves fractionally against the sun, in orbit. So their orbits would in theory look like a sine wave, if you were able to see them defined in anything other than a circle or oval.
yeah Jupiter is still a mystery they say they know everything about it but they really don't she has many secrets that baffle scientists to this day even
a sine wave is literally defined by putting an object in circular motion tracking its X or Y position, einstein...y'all really should take a physics class instead of watching random CZcams videos, you might learn something
Yeah, what the fish bowl guy said !
Thank you for this informative video on our gas giant protector. I was captivated from beginning to end!
Thank you Jupiter for taking one for the team.
Jupiter is the MVP!!
Jupiter is the Batman of the solar system. He protects us from asteroids, like how Batman fights crime in Gotham, and protects people.
Love videos about Jupiter..
This channel is my favorite..the voice is soo perfect..👌👌
It’s so cool to know everything about not only our planet, but everything in the universe.
The source coder(s) of the current construct we're in would like a word with the first sim who knows everything about it. ;)
Yup, almost like they have been to these planets and the sun and have dug to the cores to have this knowledge they teach like it is factual.
Everything in the universe? We don't even know everything about our planet or our solar system, let alone our galaxy. There are parts of the universe expanding away from us faster than the speed of light, which we'll never be able to observe. We can try to find out as much as possible but if you want to know everything, you're in for a big disappointment
@@jakesusnik5038 however, the calculations still keep planes in the air and can send spaceships into precise orbits. Meanwhile your people teach that there is a god who sacrificed himself to himself to create a loophole for the rules that he had created even though you have never drilled to the core of this god or taken any measurements
@@Vaidelotelis Bernoulli's principle is testable, which is why we can engineer airplanes that are able to fly. None of this hypothetical nonsense is remotely testable. The fact that you conflate observational science with theoretical and historical science to enforce your atheistic worldview would be comical if it weren't so tragic. Enjoy your life, little puppet. What comes after will be something else. Science is no friend of the atheist world-view. All testable, observational science suggests the existence of governing intelligence. Search on youtube for "Mandelbrot Set".
Uhhh, what do you mean “… not what we’re being told.” What a misleading title.
Great explanation of a barycenter! I will be able to explain that much better now, thank you.
It's not what we're 🐝-ing told!
What? Whatd you say?
@@MattL-dl2suBee -ing 😂
Imagine looking up at the night sky and seeing Jupitar instead of our moon? That be a beautiful site to see indeed.
It would also be the last thing you ever saw as the immense gravitational pull would rip the Earth apart.
In *all* cases of one body orbiting another, they both orbit the barycenter of the two bodies. It is simply the case that when one body is much more massive than the other, and the distance between them is not that great, the barycenter will be within the larger of the two bodies.
Jupiter to Earth: I got you bro.
Jupiter: the hero we didn't know we needed
it didn't workout for the dinasaurs did it?
@@majkul512 Ayy, even the best of heros make mistakes.
Great video👍
Four years before this video was released, Jupiter was known to have 79 moons, with Saturn leading at 82, so Jupiter no longer has the most moons in the solar system. Two errors in one sentence.
I suspect that when those asteroids hit Jupiter years ago, it probably had very little effect on Jupiter. It was more of a unfortunate situation for the damn rocks than Jupiter, 😅
Can't wait until Starfield. The closest I'm getting to exploring the solar system. Haha.
Wait a month after release to buy. Probably gonna need a patch n see what the missions are like for all the plants. Hopefully not generic and copy pasta
Elite Dangerous has been out for years. Although you gotta earn the right to enter the SOL system (but if you know how, it's just a couple hours of grinding)
Shoemaker Levy 9 was the beginning of my fascination with Jupiter and space in general. Decades and much reading later, I now have a much better understanding of job security....
"Lets build an awesome space telescope to answer some of our questions".
Years later..."we have waaay more new questions than answers. We need to build a newer, better telescope to create and endless supply of questions".
Bravo to the teams behind Hubble and the JWT for keeping the world fascinated with each new discovery made. Incredible.
Nice to revisit these ideas.
3:25 This is not how orbital mechanics works. If its trajectory was on the solar side of Jupiter, it would be flung out of the solar system, not drawn in. The trajectory should be on the exact opposite side of Jupiter as shown. It shows the difference between understanding orbital mechanics versus just talking about them as though understood. Animation is wrong.
4:48 This animation is wrong in the exact same way. Gravity does not repel objects, ever.
Have you ever heard about the negative gravity? /s
Give it a break, this video is entirely made by ai
There’s dozens of channels like these
It never ceases to amaze me how they can take some photos and then tell us how much they know about the universe. When there are so much they don't know about things on earth where they can study things more closely.
😅 Thank you, fellow logical thinker.
@@inthem-a-kingScientists actually explore the ocean way more than outer universe, but the universe is incredibly vast and way more interesting
Earth is more complex than these, and we still dont know everything about Earth. Thats not to say they know everything about the planets in our solar system either though.
Good point
What blows my mind more than anything is the amount of people who are writing off this phenomenon as “expected” and “well no duh it’s had billions of years to stabilize broh”
I enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
Huge fan of this channel & the content provided! Ive always been passionate & fascinated with the Cosmos & all its celestial bodies & mysteries. Thank you for providing this educational & entertaining videos on my favorite scientific subjects! Cheers! 🍻 🎉
Agree, it is so refreshing to find a channel like this one.
😂😂😂 Good One!
Does anyone remember a Star Trek episode called "Tin Man" That one mini moon.
@@mariemelansongundy-vx4ox Which Star Trek? There's many lol
@@AugustDreamScape "Tin Man"
Excellent video. I thought I knew a lot about Jupiter but this has added a lot of newer information that I was unaware of.
Jupiter has so far 95 moons (Juny 2023) ... but Saturn got 145 moons since May 2023.
I've always been intrigued by Astronomy
Amazing how little we truly know about the planets in our own solar system. Same can be said for our own oceans.
We know less of our oceans than the universe.
Or so I heard.
@@kubel83that’s not true mate
Oceans are just the planets dumpster
@@shaunoboyle238 As of December 15 2022, humans have only explored 5% of the earths oceans yet we discover 2000 new species of aquatic life every year. The majority of lifeforms on the planet resides in the earths oceans. Just a little bit of clarification for you.
@@davidtrottier8963 I was not speaking to you, I’m saying we know less about our universe than our oceans.
I feel a little more safer now knowing Jupiter help protect us
don't lol, Jupiter has also flung multiple objects into the inner solar system and likely was the culprit behind some of the asteroids and comets that have hit earth in the past.
This is very nice. Now, about the “headline.”
Isn't there speculation that Jupiter is a failed or dead star? It seems to have quite a number of the characteristics in line. But the truly fascinating thing is the liquid metal hydrogen. I was taught in school that each element only has 3 or 4 states: Gas, liquid, solid, and plasma? But I never learned much about plasma, so mostly it was 3. But to find that there can be such drastic differences in the characteristics, or that there can be more than 1 liquid form, that's really interesting.
If you're ready, Welcome to your Electric Universe.
What a cool place!
One could only imagine what life might look like that managed to form in a place like that.
Non existent.
@@user-co6lt6nc3i
Just like your imagination.
Maybe in the clouds!
Uranus was explored once. Never again.
@@user-co6lt6nc3i you know nothing, Jon Snow. it could be so different from life on our planet, based on other components
First time i saw the polar storms i was terrified.
It was frickin' awesome.
Being that Jupiter was "almost a star" makes the barycenter of gravity make more sense. Before this video, I assumed that the sun was a fixed anchor point in our solar system. Therefore after seeing this video, and the discovery of the off center /COG; this means that the Sun actually wobbles in it's path around the COG of the Milky Way. Which should also indicate that the COG of the Milky Way does the same thing , on it's path through this Universe !
Nothing stays still. The universe itself is in motion
Wut. The milky way isn’t orbiting anything.
@@robappleby583 Nobody said it is.
Why do people think Jupiter was almost a star? It would need another 80 jupiters to give it enough mass to be a red dwarf. It's nowhere close to being a star.
Now I really know what scientist are not telling us about Jupiter.
I don't understand the graphics showing objects being repelled by Jupiter. That would seem counterintuitive as gravity should attract objects rather than repel them. I could understand deflections created in the path of an object or even a rare slingshot around Jupiter but not the uturn made by the object as it heads toward the planet.
The objects are in reality passing around the outside of Jupiter and being pulled into a new trajectory. My guess is that they used such an oversized representation of Jupiter that modelling this interaction would see the objects crashing into/passing thru their overblown picture of Jupiter, and they thought misrepresenting the trajectories instead was a preferable compromise. Or maybe the animators just had no idea about what they were supposed to be modelling.
I think we need to reclassify Asteroid moons if pluto gets a reclassification because I think only the Galileo moons should be considered as Moons. Moons need to be seperated for Moons / Satellites / Man Made Satellites because its silly to call those specs moons.
Agreed
I can definitely agree. Another tricky part though is that our own moon might actually be too big to qualify as a moon in relation to earth. It's relative size and distance are such that it's path through the solar system is ever so slightly more centered around the sun than it is Earth. Where all other moons clearly curve away from the sun at times, Earth's moon never does.
@@elliotlevy8610 Easy fix binary planet system children now days are way smatter then people give them credit for they are far more accepting of change. I believe in the Sumerians too who said the Asteroid belt was a planet before.
Agreed
Rather than getting overly complicated, the IAU should simply define "moon" and "moonlet". I think one of the primary defining points should be that a moon has enough mass to be spherical, whereas a moonlet would not.
I always thought that if Jupiter had been larger it would have had a chance to become a star
All that pressure
Probably a fusion reaction at centre
God help us when it goes nova
I have a question... Does the Peltier effect occur with liquid metals?
So if liquid metals behave like... well liquids... If there is a denser liquid metal and a less dense one mixed together then they would separate themselves similar to how oil and water would separate?
So for example. Taking a cup of water and pouring in a few drops of cooking oil. There would be a cup of water with a blob of cooking oil floating on it.
Now if this was a "sea of metal" with an island sized blob of "differing metal" floating in it... And say... I dunno... A giant lightning storm keeps pelting the liquid metal oceans with lightning... Could one metal get really hot and the other get really cold?
I feel really lucky to find your channel guys. Enjoying each video you've made, waiting for the next one. Thank you
exactly they deserves an appreciation
their presentation always made me satisfied
Bro they copied the content
@hemant_films If the initial source has better quality, I'm always ready to subscribe to them as well :)
Bro there are hundreds of these channels uploading content every 12 hours and be real, its ai spitting out random content
Fascinating thanks 🙏
Scientists: JUPITER WE KNOW YOUR SECRETS!
Jupiter: nuh uh
That the giant red spot has changed in my lifetime blows away my concept of the big picture of time.
For the record - Juno mission ended a couple years ago. Final pass, they sent it in to the planet and sent back data from the atmosphere before it got crushed from Jupiters immense gravity and overall hostile conditions.
No no no. You messed up a little. It was Galileo that got crushed 10 yrs ago. Juno is still working. Common there are 1000s of people today including me who take photos every 6months before it orbits away for 6 months.
@@Talal189 you’re right. I was thinking of Cassini & Saturn. My bad.
@@geoffoverfield37 clearly a skill issue
I always suspected that Jupiter was in fact a Death Star.
Yarth Middederp created it all by itself, and It's why we all celebrate Middlederp Day every 10 billion years - we blew up 3 worlds, and I got so drunk I didn't wake up for 3 thousand years!
Makes me wonder if in 100s or thousands more years humans will develope the technology to send something to the surface that can syrvive and travel about to see what's really going on under there.
There's not really a surface to send it to, and if you materialised there the immense gravity would immediately flatten you into a pool of goo about the thickness of a human hair.
Jupiter was considered a gas giant when I was in school in the late 1970s. I wasn’t even aware that they ever thought it was a terrestrial planet.
And Jupiter does not have the largest magnetosphere in the solar system - the sun does.
They don't know....they are guessing
Just like with most of space.
There's another theory of cosmology, that the standard model supporters would rather ignore...
So the arc paths of the comet deflection is on the wrong side of the planet.
Just saying.
If the paths were the way shown, they would have to have been reflected.
Deflection happens on the opposite side of the trajectory.
I noticed that too! Figured it's just one of those breakdowns between animators and the experts providing the information.
Yup.. I was searching the comments to see if this was mentioned.....
YES! Thank you
"Scientists learn new information and update what we know accordingly" there fixed your title for you
Younger dryas impact event was only 15000yrs ago. So i think its fair to say the impacts happen a little more frequently than millions of years.
I thought the narrator said that the planets' orbits are circular. It's been my understanding that they are elliptical. 🤔
Only one elliptical is Pluto or Saturn
And some others
None of the orbits are circular and Pluto orbit is more narrow and off plane
@@448819earth is only planet with circular orbit
quick question: what does "beeing" mean?
Jupiter is actually a beehive
🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝
I'm glad someone else noticed that, but I guess no one is going to give a serious answer as to why a science channel seemingly mispelled one of the simplest words.
I thought this was going to be about bees.
How can they possibly know what the core is like
The odds of all of these occurrences being so precise to allow life on earth is absolutely astounding.
Life evolves where it can, whether that life is around for a shorter (e.g. omeoba) or longer period of time (intelligent species). It has nothing to do with "precise occurances" which only lets the life on a planet to keep going for a longer period of time.
@@meacadwell You’ve obviously never read, heard of or understood the Drake equation or any other probabilistic arguments for life. Anyone who says life has nothing to do with “precise occurrences” is willfully ignorant. The odds of life emerging in the universe are so unbelievable that it transcends human comprehension.
@@cloud1stclass372 Lol, I was reading about the Drake equation over 30 years ago and do understand it.
Let me put it in a way you will understand things: Life will show up where it can. Full stop.
We find life in places on Earth experts originally didn't think could harbor life (glaciers in Antarctica, heat vents at the bottom of the ocean, lava microbes, etc.)
If life develops on a planet then it could possibly evolve from a microbe to intelligent life over time. Or it could be annihilated by a violent asteroid collision at the microbial stage.
Where carbon life forms aren't viable another type of life might thrive. Perhaps silicone based. If it's not silicone it would be something else.
Then scientists use intelligence to piece together why life appeared at that particular location/planet/etc.
It's all chance occurance.
And life in the universe, per the Drake equation, there are probably between 1000 and 100,000,000 planets with civilizations in the Milky Way Galaxy....although it may not be what we would recognize as life and it may not be intelligent life.
Take your willful ignorance and arrogance elsewhere.
@@cloud1stclass372true the universe is soo vast that there's probably of every possible similar planet being in the same solar system and in different arrangements, it just happened so that in our solar system the particular arrangement was suitable for life, it's nothing but probability like you said
@@cloud1stclass372Wouldn't that imply that life forming naturally is near impossible without some powerful intelligence behind it?
Jupiter is basically the Sol systems baseball mitt.
Wow, Saturn actually has the most moons and like always with this channel, I have learned literally nothing.
It's my first time here. Question, if it's so dumb, why do you keep watching it?
Mind-blowing
I remember how the Gas Giant Jupiter, when I attended Science Classes back in 1950's, and 60's. The amount of knowledge, since then, is Mind Boggling!! This a such a Educational Video for us Science Geeks! What an Incredible Universe We exist in!!!
You forgot to capitalize Knowledge.
@@jgrab1 Gimme a Break!! Ha!ha!ha!
Oof
The red and blue spots and other phenomena are a consequence of an inner elongated, cigar- or boomerang-shaped solid substance that is a little more than half as long as Jupiter's radius. Because its density is close to that of the inner compressed gases, it remains difficult to map out by Juno and other probes. 😜
why did no one tell me Jupiter had a huge blue spot on it
Are you sure about the water/ ammonia content, water dose not like pressure unless it exerted tremendous alternative pressure. But I cannot say that happens, please advise 😊
No, the asteroid belt isnt a collection of captured objects. It is far more likely it is the remains of a planet.
Good guy Jupiter protecting us all
our sun rides on the galactic wave, the planets in our solar system spiral after it.
The core of Jupiter is Molton elements of mixed proportion held together by it's heavy gravitational force upon itself. Most of the atmosphere is very large in mass consisting of various gasses.
The thumbnail is not an accurate depiction of the gas giant planet.
no mater how cold it is not to forget the needed Density3 to have water vapor turn into a liquid state ,lack of preshure keeps water in an etheric D4 form which is gas even chrystals wont form and is not directly avoided due to amonia ; it's the dencity !
This video actually delivers on what it promises. I actually learned a lot of new things, and I am very grateful for this. Thank you, and keep it up, videos like these inspire quality ⚡😎
Except it promised to reveal that it's not what we've been told, yet it's exactly what we've been told.
But then you use critical thinking .... how could they possibly know this? Have we even been to the planet much less somehow got to the core to take samples so they would have some sort of factual data to make claims like this?
@@jakesusnik5038 That's not really critical thinking that's more skeptical thinking, letting go of a hammer and not seeing it hit the floor, you would use critical thinking to know that it has hit the floor, without the physical evidence that it has done so, skeptical thinking is the kind of thinking you're suggesting, I didn't see it hit the floor so how do I know it hit the floor, sure there's that one in a billion chance that someone decided to catch the hammer before it hit the ground, but unlikely, what we know about Jupiter is exactly the same thing, except with methods of much greater complexity then a rudimentary understanding of gravity.
Where's the hole from the thumbnail?
Must be a next level joke because the title and thumbnail were a complete lie. If true, i applaud you.
Ive always Wondered if the red spot, being a giant storm, isn't moving around an enormous crater on the surface. Or if there is no surface, a moon or other body that has been swallowed by the gas giant. Maybe it has something to do with the magnetic interference...
It's a gas planet, there is no solid surface
There’s an electrical influence going on I believe, as there are storms/marks in the clouds that correspond to the orbits of its moons.
If it’s a “gas” planet, why did the pieces of the comet Shoemaker Levy 9 explode on the surface leaving marks where they hit, vs passing deep into the planet just absorbing them. Especially considering the size of the comet fragments compared to the size of Jupiter. And why did the fragments explode? If it were a gas, it would have just passed into it possibly go thru the other side. The pieces clearly blew up really close to the surface.
@@helpdeskjnp it's been widely accepted over the past several decades that the outer planets are gas, except pluto (which was demoted as a planet) but I've never been there so I guess i cannot 100% confirm this. Shoemaker levy looked like it passed into the clouds, and the spots eventually cleared, never heard of exploding fragments, but again, I haven't studied it in years. But that's interesting so I'll read up on that. I do remember that the largest thing in the solar system is actually Jupiter's magnetosphere, and without that large planet we would be more regularly bombarded by larger meteors and debris, possibly negating the evolution of higher intelligence on this planet. But these are things I retained from college years ago and I could be wrong, but I personally believe they still hold true. But i'm an amateur astronomer, not a "real" one.
@@helpdeskjnp the velocities and pressure mediation involved effectively make Jupiter a solid surface. Like when comets below a certain size impact our atmosphere only and ‘explode’, happened recently in Siberia
It's (near) impossible for Jupiter to have striations of atmosphere without a solid mass underneath it providing friction. How would they even know it was gaseous anyway? From some speculative equations of Copernacus?
Extremely interesting, thanks.
I love Jupiter.
I'm fascinated by it too
With a magnetic field that powerful, Jupiter might potentially serve as a semi perpetual power source that could outlast our Sun going nova. Those 90 plus moons should be investigated for alien technology.😎
The sun is too small to go nova. You have the sum total of all human knowledge at your fingertips and still say wrong shit with your whole chest
And for oil 😎 🇺🇲
The way he said laboratory was just.. Great lol
Incredible video - I actually have to re-boil the kettle I was so engrossed!
Well if there are bees there.. Certainly not!
Jupiter is indeed a very mysterious planet. Its mass is 318 times that of the Earth, but its volume is 1000 times that of our globe. It shows a very low density of 1.3g per cubic centimeter, or a quarter of that of the Earth, but according to John Lear, Jupiter is not a gas giant, only NASA is a gas giant. It is therefore hollow. But in these hollows, what happens?
You have to watch out for the hollows Things happen improbable the creature Foggy Bottoms.
U better not trust those NASA data.. what is it's mass according to John Lear? or you? It must be way higher density with all alien civ inside.. just think about it, bro.
Thank you Jupiter for taking one for the team.. Thank you Jupiter for taking one for the team..
10:48 Water itself does not conduct electricity. It is the traces of minerals and metals that are usually found in it that do so. The comparison between water and liquid metallic hydrogen for electrical conductivity is flawed.
I have a feeling that there are sources on Jupiter that can be a good source of fuel to power the Earth
Imagine it's really just a giant petrol/gas station
@@nffclacey 👍🏻
@@nffclacey don't give the Shell's, BP's etc of this world any fancy ideas. 😅
@@nffclacey hold on ! how is a planet made of fossil fuels ?
@@martinfidel7086
Because it’s not “fossil fuel”.
“Fossil fuel” is a theory!
Even though they teach us it’s science fact!
Based on certain biological markers found in crude…
Decades ago Russian scientists concluded it’s a natural byproduct of earths cooling.
A far more plausible theory but largely ignored by western scientists probably…
Well because it’s Russian?
“Beeing” told? please don’t tell me it’s full of bees
Jupiter: "Why you Earth scientists gotta do me like this?"
I think that us as humans need to start studying Jupiter and Saturn a lot closer and try to start finding ways to see more on these planets..and also studying Jupiter's moons...what yall think on an intellectual level?
But but........ I like Uranus
I like how this video mention a lot interesting facts, but I don't like how it makes pointless conclusions. The fact that Jupiter's gravity effects comets is very interesting, but it's a rather wild assumption to say that by anything other than random chance, Jupiter protects Earth from comets.
This video is made by ai that's why
Of course it's random or considered by some to be fate when comets go flying towards Jupitor. Or do you mean to say that someone is purposefully throwing comets at the planet? What they are pointing out is that due to Jupitor's ridiculous size those random comets are affected by its gravity in such a way that it could be considered to be protecting the Earth.
@@thebatman07 You have any evidence? or are you just ASS-uming?
What difference does that make? No-one said that it has a conscious intent, it's just that as it lies in its orbit it intervenes in random asteroids trajectories thereby deflecting most away from the inner circle of planets.
@@arucarddimples1944 Good response
Um, we're being told that Jupiter is a gas giant. Is that not true?
just from a laymans perspective.... if something is coming straight through it has a very specific chance of hitting the earth... not if jupiter changes its trajectory while within the space of our galacy, i would think that broadens the potential hit zone for earth because it's no longer coming in at 90 degrees, but at a lesser angle, therefore making a tangential point of impact larger...
Is this video made by AI ?
I actually have been curious about this little unrelated Jupiter but our own Moon here on Earth is that not technically inside the the protective magnetic field of the earth puts out?
Yes, but because magnetic fields get exponentially weaker the further from the source they are, the field is nowhere near strong enough to protect the moon from the sun's intense radiation
The Earth's magnetic field is also not spherical, because the solar wind is constantly pushing on it.
Try again. Don't hurt yourself.
A video titled "Jupiter is not what we're beeing told" can be safely ignored
feeling like we need a holiday for Jupiter