I've ordered my Swace this week. I'd be interested in learning more about that CVT Rubber-banding, but if I want speed, I'll jump into my GTO. Like you said, you're not buying a Swace for its speed or dynamic driving. Comfort, reliability and practicality are the themes for me in a daily-driver.
Got ours just the other week. Its comfy and feels like a great family car. Impressed so far. Rubber banding will not be an issue unless pushed hard. Crazy thrifty
@@davidtaylorbfd I’m still enjoying the car. It doesn’t ever really run purely on either the electric motor or the petrol engine, it switches seamlessly between the two. You barely notice. Accelerate, and the engine kicks in. Get up to speed and ease off the gas, the engine switches off and the electric motor takes over. Even at 60mph, on the flat, it’ll run on the motor, until the battery charge drops to a certain level, at which point the engine will kick in again. I’m getting about 55 mpg around town, even on “sport” mode which is pretty quick and makes the vehicle surprisingly responsive in traffic.
I'll drive the facelifted Swace with 140 HP in 4 days and I'm excited! Why? Because the car is so unexcited 🙃 I own a Puma right now and I also tested the Focus Estate Active with the 155 HP Automatic and I was a bit disappointed... We already own a 2019 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid and it's so smooth, comfortable and relaxing. The Puma is very agile and always "ready to jump". Sometimes I think my way of driving is too boring for that car 😆 It always tells me "give me more, give me more" but meanwhile I prefer the chilling way of driving. The Focus Estate is a great car and fun to drive... no doubt! But for such a big family car I'd like it to have a bit more comfy and calmly. We'll see what the Swace will be like. I also tested the Kia Niro HEV and I loved it... It's fantastic 👏
The E-CVT is an integral part of the hybrid system. And it's not a regular CVT either, but suffers from the same effect, although it is ultra reliable due to the reduced number of mechanical parts. Very clever system, to be fair. In effect, it's a Prius, with a big boot, like the Corolla Touring.
I've ordered this car at a price of 24250€ just today. I haven't driven it because they don't have this car availeble at test drive, but i'm thinking is better then the car a own at this moment: a 1.9 diesel seat altea xl from 2008.
From what I can see, with the Toyota you are paying more for the badge. Looking into it, you get more for your buck with the Swace, but 2 years less warranty.
Looks like it is cheaper in the used cars market and you get more tech. Only issue is you don't get the warranty service scheme like Toyota. But it is a Toyota inside so shouldn't have any issues if looked after.
In some countries the Suzuki warranty is better and there are more Suzuki dealerships (easier servicing). I went with the Swace for these reasons in Hungary. Plus they had one readily available in a dealership instead of 3-6 months wait times Toyota was telling me. And it was significantly cheaper with a nice discount.
Hi there, thanks for watching. I'm not saying I want to drive the Monte Carlo Rally, it would just be nice to have some more involvement from the driving experience.
I have been in a few toyota version taxi,s these were diesel the seem quite decent well made cars but under hard acceleration they do feel like they have a clutch that is slipping, i would of hoped cvt,s had died out by now not really a fan of the cvt either .
There are some pros to a CVT, but I do find it interesting how it's only mainly the Japanese brands that continue to use them. Thanks for watching Paul 👍🏽
Sazuki, reliability doesn't spring to mind, nice enough looking cars. Toyota very reliable but not nice looking cars! You would think this would be a match made in heaven, then you see the front of that car! 🤢
@@CarObsession You have most definitely never owned a grand vitara in the noughties, quite possibly one of the worst cars of that generation. I had gearbox problems within a year of buying. Luckily enough didn't lose too much on it trading it in. My brother wasn't so lucky, he left a 6 year old grand vitara in Ireland, it was basically breaking down every other month with one thing or the other, it broke down again while he was in Ireland, it spent the week in a garage while he enjoyed his holiday. Then broke down again in Belfast in the stena line boat carpark. He left it after him unlocked with the keys in the glove compartment and a note with his name and address and the reason it was left there. (Folk were still very nervous seeing cars abandoned in car parks in Belfast back then lol) he Rang the first scrap dealer he could find in Belfast when he got home and told them where it was and to take it for nothing.
@@simonnorton3758 TBF I have never heard anything negative about the Swift, it was the Grand Vitara's that had an awful reputation back then. Although technology has moved on so much it wouldn't put me off buying a Suzuki, my wife had a Vitara in her short list a couple of years ago, she actually really liked it as well as the Honda hrv, but Nissan Qashqai's all round camera view won her over in the end.
Aaron Interior Materials and Quality is incredibly important. The type of materials used and if the interior has soft plastics or not is a very important part of the car. If there are no soft touch plastics on at least the dashboard in this segment then the car will be cheap, low quality and not worth buying.
It depends who you're asking. I've had some viewers say they much prefer hard plastics as they are easier to upkeep and they are more rugged, but I get what you mean.
How is it negatives all over? As much as I welcome feedback, I say your comment is equally really harsh and to say it's negatives all over is unfair and also incorrect. Almost from the get go I said it was very comfortable, how is that negative? I instantly followed that comment up by saying the car is laidback and very pleasant? I also said the engine is quiet when driving around town. I said the visibility is good, and also complimented the handling. I said the interior is nicer than the average Suzuki. All negatives all over? 🤔
@@CarObsession yep. I didn't last until the very end. Watched so many reviews for this car, did a test drive in the meantime, back to reviews. You can either ballance it with pros and cons, however when stating it's slow, etc what did you expect? All in all it's a best buy if you keep it for at least 75k km as the consumption is low and that's why I'm here and many others. You don't buy this car because it's fast, speedy, sport. You buy it for comfort and low consumption, plus the 10 year warranty. A true salesman's heart can accept feedback and this is my opinion, now a bit more detailed. Nothing personal.
@@basyl2 I'm not a salesman? Also, you say didn't last until the very end, but most of the positive points I mentioned were in the first part of the video? I'm all for accepting criticism, when it's fair, which I believe yours isn't. Yes I said it felt a bit slow, and then I countered that with saying it's not been designed for speed.
@@CarObsession you got all positive comments and a guy walks in and tells stuff you don't like. That's life and this is the first review i didn't enjoy, out of the tens I've seen for this car. Live with it
@@basyl2 I think you are misunderstanding me. I have no complaints about recieving feedback that's not positive, but not when it's inaccurate. You said my review "is negatives all over", which simply isn't the case - THAT is my frustration. Thank you for watching, and thank you for taking the time to give me feedback. You may think I'm a bitter person that can't take feedback, but if you got to know you'd know that's not the case. Edit: If I had a viewpoint in which I loathed negative feedback so much and couldn't take it, I would simply just delete the comments I don't like, which is something I NEVER do. Or, I would simply ignore them, but I've taken time out to converse with you to delve deeper in your feedback. I wouldn't want to do that if I didn't want to genuinely engage with you.
I've ordered my Swace this week. I'd be interested in learning more about that CVT Rubber-banding, but if I want speed, I'll jump into my GTO. Like you said, you're not buying a Swace for its speed or dynamic driving. Comfort, reliability and practicality are the themes for me in a daily-driver.
Hi there, thanks for the comment and thanks for watching.
Got ours just the other week.
Its comfy and feels like a great family car. Impressed so far. Rubber banding will not be an issue unless pushed hard. Crazy thrifty
I enjoyed watching the Video Review. A welcome addition to the Suzuki Range
Glad you enjoyed it Jamie!
I test drove it last week, and ordered one on lease. Nice car, very smooth and comfortable. Huge boot, just what I needed.
Hi Sandy, I'm glad you like the car, thanks for watching 👍🏽.
How are you getting on with the car?, I'm interested in getting one. How far can you go on electric?.
@@davidtaylorbfd I’m still enjoying the car. It doesn’t ever really run purely on either the electric motor or the petrol engine, it switches seamlessly between the two. You barely notice. Accelerate, and the engine kicks in. Get up to speed and ease off the gas, the engine switches off and the electric motor takes over.
Even at 60mph, on the flat, it’ll run on the motor, until the battery charge drops to a certain level, at which point the engine will kick in again.
I’m getting about 55 mpg around town, even on “sport” mode which is pretty quick and makes the vehicle surprisingly responsive in traffic.
I'll drive the facelifted Swace with 140 HP in 4 days and I'm excited! Why? Because the car is so unexcited 🙃 I own a Puma right now and I also tested the Focus Estate Active with the 155 HP Automatic and I was a bit disappointed... We already own a 2019 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid and it's so smooth, comfortable and relaxing. The Puma is very agile and always "ready to jump". Sometimes I think my way of driving is too boring for that car 😆 It always tells me "give me more, give me more" but meanwhile I prefer the chilling way of driving. The Focus Estate is a great car and fun to drive... no doubt! But for such a big family car I'd like it to have a bit more comfy and calmly. We'll see what the Swace will be like. I also tested the Kia Niro HEV and I loved it... It's fantastic 👏
Hi there, thanks for watching, and thanks for the comment.
The E-CVT is an integral part of the hybrid system. And it's not a regular CVT either, but suffers from the same effect, although it is ultra reliable due to the reduced number of mechanical parts. Very clever system, to be fair.
In effect, it's a Prius, with a big boot, like the Corolla Touring.
Interesting as usual, great to the point review
Hi Mike, thanks for watching, and thanks for the feedback!
Excellent review, Aaron. I'm one of those who like these kinds of cars - practical and (likely to be) reliable.
Thank you! 👍🏽
@@CarObsession Keep these 'automotive socks' car reviews coming!
Very informative, thanks.
Thanks Christophe!
Very good review. I like the design of the car.
Thanks mate!
The 2023 version is much improved. Nicer power by a long way.
I've ordered this car at a price of 24250€ just today. I haven't driven it because they don't have this car availeble at test drive, but i'm thinking is better then the car a own at this moment: a 1.9 diesel seat altea xl from 2008.
Hi there, thanks for watching and thanks for the comment.
Aaron did you feel it was noisy inside when you drove the car?
No, not from what I can remember. Thanks for watching.
This is not just a rebadged Corolla?
Yes.
It's about £1K cheaper than the Corolla but Toyota comes with a 5 year warranty while Suzuki is only 3 years !
Hi S Dry, yes, that was mentioned in the video, thanks for watching.
In Romania cames with 10 years warranty. The Corolla has only 6 years.
@@mihaibotez i think you mean the battery, not the car
In Holland, Suzuki comes with a 5 year warrenty as well !
Even 6 years now !!!
Good review Aaron. Not sure why anyone would have one of these over the Toyota Corolla estate though.
It's cheaper?
From what I can see, with the Toyota you are paying more for the badge. Looking into it, you get more for your buck with the Swace, but 2 years less warranty.
Looks like it is cheaper in the used cars market and you get more tech. Only issue is you don't get the warranty service scheme like Toyota. But it is a Toyota inside so shouldn't have any issues if looked after.
In some countries the Suzuki warranty is better and there are more Suzuki dealerships (easier servicing). I went with the Swace for these reasons in Hungary. Plus they had one readily available in a dealership instead of 3-6 months wait times Toyota was telling me. And it was significantly cheaper with a nice discount.
You by the car for Monte Carlo rally its not for you..but drive many miles is a really good car..
Hi there, thanks for watching. I'm not saying I want to drive the Monte Carlo Rally, it would just be nice to have some more involvement from the driving experience.
I have been in a few toyota version taxi,s these were diesel the seem quite decent well made cars but under hard acceleration they do feel like they have a clutch that is slipping, i would of hoped cvt,s had died out by now not really a fan of the cvt either .
There are some pros to a CVT, but I do find it interesting how it's only mainly the Japanese brands that continue to use them. Thanks for watching Paul 👍🏽
You can't buy a diesel version
Sazuki, reliability doesn't spring to mind, nice enough looking cars. Toyota very reliable but not nice looking cars!
You would think this would be a match made in heaven, then you see the front of that car! 🤢
I've never known Suzuki to have a bad name when it comes to reliability, quite the opposite. Thanks for watching John.
@@CarObsession You have most definitely never owned a grand vitara in the noughties, quite possibly one of the worst cars of that generation. I had gearbox problems within a year of buying. Luckily enough didn't lose too much on it trading it in.
My brother wasn't so lucky, he left a 6 year old grand vitara in Ireland, it was basically breaking down every other month with one thing or the other, it broke down again while he was in Ireland, it spent the week in a garage while he enjoyed his holiday. Then broke down again in Belfast in the stena line boat carpark. He left it after him unlocked with the keys in the glove compartment and a note with his name and address and the reason it was left there. (Folk were still very nervous seeing cars abandoned in car parks in Belfast back then lol) he Rang the first scrap dealer he could find in Belfast when he got home and told them where it was and to take it for nothing.
I've owned 3 Swifts, from Launch to 2015, and never had a problem. The engines are very good in my opinion.
@@simonnorton3758 TBF I have never heard anything negative about the Swift, it was the Grand Vitara's that had an awful reputation back then. Although technology has moved on so much it wouldn't put me off buying a Suzuki, my wife had a Vitara in her short list a couple of years ago, she actually really liked it as well as the Honda hrv, but Nissan Qashqai's all round camera view won her over in the end.
I’ve had two Ignis and a Vitara. No problems at all.
Aaron Interior Materials and Quality is incredibly important. The type of materials used and if the interior has soft plastics or not is a very important part of the car. If there are no soft touch plastics on at least the dashboard in this segment then the car will be cheap, low quality and not worth buying.
It depends who you're asking. I've had some viewers say they much prefer hard plastics as they are easier to upkeep and they are more rugged, but I get what you mean.
yes you are being really harsh. it`s a car designed for low consumption. this review is all negatives all over.
How is it negatives all over? As much as I welcome feedback, I say your comment is equally really harsh and to say it's negatives all over is unfair and also incorrect. Almost from the get go I said it was very comfortable, how is that negative? I instantly followed that comment up by saying the car is laidback and very pleasant?
I also said the engine is quiet when driving around town. I said the visibility is good, and also complimented the handling. I said the interior is nicer than the average Suzuki.
All negatives all over? 🤔
@@CarObsession yep. I didn't last until the very end. Watched so many reviews for this car, did a test drive in the meantime, back to reviews. You can either ballance it with pros and cons, however when stating it's slow, etc what did you expect?
All in all it's a best buy if you keep it for at least 75k km as the consumption is low and that's why I'm here and many others. You don't buy this car because it's fast, speedy, sport. You buy it for comfort and low consumption, plus the 10 year warranty.
A true salesman's heart can accept feedback and this is my opinion, now a bit more detailed. Nothing personal.
@@basyl2 I'm not a salesman? Also, you say didn't last until the very end, but most of the positive points I mentioned were in the first part of the video? I'm all for accepting criticism, when it's fair, which I believe yours isn't. Yes I said it felt a bit slow, and then I countered that with saying it's not been designed for speed.
@@CarObsession you got all positive comments and a guy walks in and tells stuff you don't like. That's life and this is the first review i didn't enjoy, out of the tens I've seen for this car. Live with it
@@basyl2 I think you are misunderstanding me. I have no complaints about recieving feedback that's not positive, but not when it's inaccurate. You said my review "is negatives all over", which simply isn't the case - THAT is my frustration. Thank you for watching, and thank you for taking the time to give me feedback.
You may think I'm a bitter person that can't take feedback, but if you got to know you'd know that's not the case.
Edit: If I had a viewpoint in which I loathed negative feedback so much and couldn't take it, I would simply just delete the comments I don't like, which is something I NEVER do.
Or, I would simply ignore them, but I've taken time out to converse with you to delve deeper in your feedback. I wouldn't want to do that if I didn't want to genuinely engage with you.