The Challenges of Evidence-Based Medicine (Part 1)
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 08. 2024
- In this grand rounds lecture John P.A. Ioannidis, MD, DSc, evaluates various levels of evidence and explores the importance of quality, significance, reproducibility, and feasibility. He also explains the complexities related to nutrition and lifestyle research and lays the foundation for responsibly establishing the evidence in this area. Dr. Ioannidis is a Professor of Medicine, of Epidemiology and Population Health, and (by courtesy) of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics and Co-Director, Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Hosted by Mark Hyman, MD, Head of Strategy and Innovation, Cleveland Clinic, Center for Functional Medicine
To view part 2, please click • The Challenges of Evid...
▶Share this video with others: • The Challenges of Evid...
▶For more Grand Round videos from Functional Medicine: • Center for Functional ...
▶Subscribe to learn more about Cleveland Clinic: czcams.com/users/Clevelan... - Věda a technologie
It almost feels shameful to call him an "expert" because of how disgraced that term has become. Thank you John P.A. Ioannidis, MD, DSc for being one of the few people that kept the credibility of the sciences alive.
Credibility by publishing numerous weak papers in recent months constantly citing himself and providing limited evidence for his claims? Sure.
He has fallen steeply from grace in the eyes of many epidemiologists.
@@globalfoodaction6748 Oh now this will BE FUN. Tell me my dear fan of epidemiology which of the scientists have gained grace in the eyes of many epidemiologists? You clearly know what they are thinking so please go ahead, enlighten me, which epidemiologists did a fantastic job in 2020.
@@YDwelve Kollateralleugner
@@globalfoodaction6748 Cite one paper penned by Dr. I that is not soundly based in the scientific method.
@@JesterInfester every paper not agreeing with globalfoodactions cognitive biases i suppose...
Some argue that we shouldn't emphasize the flaws in science, because it will give ammunition to those who are "anti-science." However, overconfidence is a large part of what creates distrust. If scientists do more to acknowledge their biases and show that those biases are being addressed, there will be less distrust.
It is not science that people distrust it is the blatant corruption of science by scientists and in particular the pharmaceutical companies that is insiduos. The use of ghost written reports by the pharmaceutical companies in the various medical is one glaring example of this.
This man needs to be heard far and wide.
He was heard far and wide until he disagreed with the left wing version of events.
It's so funny how he talks about evidence based medicine and the first slide has the logo of the Institute for Functional Medicine 🤣 John is a hero.
Thank you very much!
Does anybody know what type of diet he recommends??
So which trial data do you think they would share for which trials...they know the data will be looked at closely...I wonder if the other 54 percent produces similar results
love you
Genius
The world doesn't need saving by medicine it needs saving from medicine
Need more data.
Yeah. Choked on data collection.
Need more data interpretation, not more noise.
Will you be getting the COVID vaccine ?
In this eara of covid19 induced insanity a talk by John Ioannidis feels like gourmet feast after 2 months of eating porridge...please come to denmark and save us from our homegrown "experts" in EBM...
Share this video please.
The US has approx. 30k to max 60k influenza related deaths/a, the US surpassed 350k corona related deaths by now, does that mean the arguement, that covid19 shows similar mortality rates as the flu still count???
Because masive testing of corona, if you use bad masive testing of influenza or rinovirus you gonna have similar or worst numbers
Everybody that dies and does have a positive PCR or have flu like symptoms. You are diagnosed as Covid death. Even car accidents. If it was not so sad it would be hilarious.
@@azijnseikert1918 this is a whole bunch of lies, 1) accidents will not be tested, of course not .. 2) for a long time now only patients with clear signs of Covid will be included in the statistics 3) there are specific sign to covid 4) the error margin could be determined by autopsy and appears to be stable
EVERYONE claiming otherwise is a fraud...
Show me the evidence of your claims. Then this would be easy
And autopsy shows ( Prof dr Pusschel , Hamburg) that all!! his deaths (over 200) had comorbidity. Therefore it is with Corona.
I'd rather be treated by a doctor with 30 years of clinical experience using his expertise, judgement, and intuition than a by-the-book doctor following the latest "evidence based" guidelines.
The former is a genuine professional. The latter is a technician/McDoctor at best, and a state licensed drug pusher for Big Pharma at worst.
Tweets bahahahahaha
I think it would be better to talk about years of longevity reduced by smoking rather than smoking is going to kill so many people. I promise you, those people will eventually die anyway.
Stay out of others business!
What are you talking about?
WOW, I listened to you for a couple of hours.....you lost me at the end when you pushed vaccines and climate change.