Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Calculus 3 Lecture 14.4: Center of Mass (and Moments of Mass and Inertia) for Lamina in 2-D

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 26. 04. 2016
  • Calculus 3 Lecture 14.4: Center of Mass (and Moments of Mass and Inertia) for Lamina in 2-D: How to find Center of Mass, Mass, First Moments of Mass, Second Moments of Inertia, Radius of Gyration, and solve some cool word problems.

Komentáře • 121

  • @keldonchase4492
    @keldonchase4492 Před 5 lety +87

    24:27 - Radius of gyration
    29:27 - Example 1
    47:36 - Example 2
    51:47 - Example 3
    58:48 - Example 4
    1:08:59 - Example 5

  • @hollywoodbanayad7755
    @hollywoodbanayad7755 Před 4 lety +46

    49:40 Hi Professor Leonard, thanks for the Calculus videos. They've really helped. The equation for y = -1/2x + 4 is actually y = -1/2x + 2. Explanation is on point though.

    • @osamatlms2202
      @osamatlms2202 Před 3 lety +3

      exactly

    • @larche
      @larche Před 3 lety

      Indeed!

    • @gregorymoody7730
      @gregorymoody7730 Před 2 lety +7

      classroom: "Yeah that looks right"

    • @simplystrings82
      @simplystrings82 Před 2 lety +2

      THANK YOU!!!! I just spent about a hour doubting my knowledge of slope "WHY AM I IN CALC 3 IF I DONT'T KNOW THE SLOPE FORMULA!!!!?????"

    • @johnathantran1101
      @johnathantran1101 Před 2 lety +2

      thanks you! I got scared thinking i got the wrong answer

  • @tauceti8341
    @tauceti8341 Před 8 lety +31

    2:20
    2:55 - single integral represents either. Area under curve f(x). or *THE MASS OF A STRAIGHT WIRE GIVEN A MASS DENSITY FUNCTION* (1d-idea)
    thus a double integral is analagous to this idea, the mass of a PLATE why a plate (now we're in 3 dimensions so we're dealing with planes)
    4:00 - Moments of Mass: The tendency for the lamina to rotate about an axis.
    5:34 - The further you are from the axis of rotation, the more it wants to rotate.
    6:12 - If measuring mass density away from x-axis then its measuring along y (where its *perpendicular*)
    7:25 - Mx - Tendency for rotation about x-axis. Moment of X has Y values. Why? (6:12, if measuring with respect to that x where moving a long y the axis perpendicular.)
    9:15 - Sub in y value because ^ measurement is away from x-axis so going along y. (9:45 Wrench Example)
    11:00 - My - Tendency for rotation about y-axis. Moment of Y has X values. Why (because if measuring with massdensity along y, measuring towards x the perpendicular axis to y which is x).
    12:35 - Center of Mass: x(bar) *represents average*, 13:00. X center of mass = (Tendency of rotation about Y-axis) / (mass).
    14:10 - Tend. Rotation about y all measured in x (distance). Take all the tendency of rotation of y

    • @NovaWarrior77
      @NovaWarrior77 Před 4 lety +4

      My dude, you probably forgot you commented this but you're a G.

  • @xpwasting
    @xpwasting Před 8 lety +15

    I hope to one day see a Diff EQ series so that after I take it next semester I can come back and get a better understanding using your videos. Cannot thank you enough for how much your Calculus lectures have helped me!

  • @MrEasybreezey
    @MrEasybreezey Před 3 lety +1

    Dear Professor Leonard. Thank you kindly sir. I got the flu in the second week of the semester. Have no memory of about 10 straight days. Your videos gave me enough to pass my first test with a 70 and as of this video I am completely caught up in the class a week ahead of the next test and feel confident I'll be pulling a 90 or above. Much appreciated. Hope to see more playlists.
    Sincerely
    An aspiring Sal Khan / Professor Leonard

  • @MountainValleySpringWater

    Somebody from Santa Monica College recommended your channel I heard them mention you and I just watched your video and I’m glad I did. It would be an honor to take you in person. A student is only as good as their teacher.

  • @tekashisun585
    @tekashisun585 Před 2 lety +3

    10 minutes of this video >>>>>>>>> our professor's lecture

  • @foodparadise5792
    @foodparadise5792 Před 7 lety +17

    One of the problem towards the end, the function should be x=4-2y instead of x=8-2y. I verify the answer like 4 times

    • @larche
      @larche Před 3 lety +2

      Indeed. He wrote y= (-1/2)x+4, instead of (-1/2)x+2, hence the error. Thank you!

  • @jongsoohwang6813
    @jongsoohwang6813 Před 7 lety +5

    He's so good at explaining stuff! I really wish he's my Prof

  • @eshandesai3154
    @eshandesai3154 Před 3 lety +3

    sir, i honestly believe that you are a god.

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 Před 2 lety +1

    Professor Leonard ,thank you for another awesome video/lecture on the Center of Mass for Lamina in 2 D. This material is also presented in Engineering Physics One, Statics , and Dynamics. Many upper level Engineering courses use Calculus/Advanced Calculus.

  • @user-gp8fr1nd3w
    @user-gp8fr1nd3w Před 3 lety +22

    I wish you taught physics (intro-college level) as well. Would this be possible?

  • @cfraijo4898
    @cfraijo4898 Před 8 lety +61

    Please, please to Differential Equations!!

  • @normalvector4564
    @normalvector4564 Před 4 lety +7

    Can you do a special playlist for engineering sciences? I'm pretty sure you will explain it better than any other playlist out there.

  • @treborsenaj9169
    @treborsenaj9169 Před 8 lety +32

    you're the man! you've helped me earn A's from calc 1-3! any chance differential equations are in your future posts?

    • @nicole2958
      @nicole2958 Před 8 lety

      I had that same thought! I hope he does too

    • @chocolatier9597
      @chocolatier9597 Před 8 lety

      how many hours did u study per day?

  • @jacquelynberry145
    @jacquelynberry145 Před rokem +1

    He is so good as explaining detail concepts.

  • @xoppa09
    @xoppa09 Před 6 lety +10

    An easier way to remember the xbar formula.
    Define My = M * xbar , since we can imagine concentrating all the mass of the lamina at the x bar coordinate.
    Then we see we have to divide My by M to get xbar, since My/M = (M * xbar)/M = xbar.
    Likewise for Mx.
    Then we can use the integral ∫ ∫ (y or x) ρ(x,y) dA to find Mx or My, by adding the momenta of each point in the domain.

  • @nushaierhamza7969
    @nushaierhamza7969 Před 3 lety +1

    Professor, to further illustrate the concept of why we are using mass for an iterated integral you can bring into light the idea of mass density.

  • @Pequiifer
    @Pequiifer Před 8 lety +2

    Thanks for explaining the concept of all these computations! It makes it a lot easier.

  • @franciscodonoso1654
    @franciscodonoso1654 Před 6 lety +2

    Your videos are great. Everything is explained thoroughly yet so simply.

  • @GoatzAreEpic
    @GoatzAreEpic Před rokem +2

    Fuck my life it is 1 day before the test and only now I realize this video exists rip me

  • @angrycat2789
    @angrycat2789 Před 5 lety +1

    He keeps saying the formula is weird but It actually makes a lot of sense when he explains. Specially the 2nd time. He could be a good physics teacher.

  • @adobegirl3761
    @adobegirl3761 Před 7 lety +11

    thank you so much. how you ever taught other professors how to teach better?

  • @ILikeWeatherGuy
    @ILikeWeatherGuy Před 7 lety +3

    I ACTUALLY GET IT :D two independants just say where it is on the plate. the dependant is the instantaneous mass at that point/

  • @John-iy1xi
    @John-iy1xi Před 3 lety +1

    I really enjoy these in-class videos what happened to them? I feel like they were more immersive. Regardless, if I ever get successful, I'm not forgetting this channel Prof Leonard. I'll pay a visit to patreon. In fact I think I'm going to donate what I can right now.

  • @LeonChen25
    @LeonChen25 Před 5 měsíci +1

    at 1:04:39, for theta=0 to 2pi, why don't we worry that the definite integral will negate the areas, and so the area (net signed area) would be 0? thx.

  • @Anndrew154
    @Anndrew154 Před 7 lety +1

    tanks for all de vids, you explain really well, keep it up.

  • @ILikeWeatherGuy
    @ILikeWeatherGuy Před 8 lety +8

    I learned this in first year physics... Never really understood it lol thanks for clearing that up:) i go to york university ^^

    • @shayorshayorshayor
      @shayorshayorshayor Před 4 lety +3

      Lol. Our math department is a joke compared to this ONE guy.

  • @seoexperimentations6933
    @seoexperimentations6933 Před 7 lety +2

    Leonard I saw that density fcts are related alot to double integrals, like in probabilities, electricity or whatever, could you reply explaning if I am correct, thank you!

  • @Raulg.alatorre
    @Raulg.alatorre Před 5 měsíci

    ID#:4FF7AC3 Completion: September 15, 2023
    COURSE PROVIDED BY:
    Instructor: Paul J. Scruton

  • @putrawibisono2789
    @putrawibisono2789 Před 8 lety +4

    Pleaseee do Differential Equation lectures Prof! :D:D:D

  • @evansfreeman8242
    @evansfreeman8242 Před 2 lety

    Thank you my friend, I wish you were my Calculus brofessor...

  • @lofijedi
    @lofijedi Před 3 lety +2

    "whats the first thing you're gonna wanna do?.... Give up." hahahahaha

  • @sarveshkamat7784
    @sarveshkamat7784 Před 5 lety +1

    Would you make the separate video on the proofs of these formulae??

  • @BrandonJensen-sl8sk
    @BrandonJensen-sl8sk Před 11 měsíci

    What is the intuition for multiplying by "x" and "y" in the first moments of mass? I understand it conceptually with the units, but is there some sort of proof for why you multiply these distances by the mass density?

  • @sharkleberryfin2987
    @sharkleberryfin2987 Před rokem

    For the example at 58:34, would it be equivalent to say that r goes from 0 to the function y=sqrt(4-r^2cos^2(theta))? (function for top half of the circle converted to polar)

  • @user-xv9qk3iz7b
    @user-xv9qk3iz7b Před 4 lety

    You're hero , sir..

  • @sandlertossone1813
    @sandlertossone1813 Před 8 lety +2

    why is he using a double integral to find the mass on the lamina about the x and y? I did this in calculus 2 using single integrals.

    • @canman5060
      @canman5060 Před 6 lety +2

      Double integral will being you more to the world of reality !

  • @briannamorreno
    @briannamorreno Před 2 lety

    I am a bit confused because in his video, Professor Leonard adds the opposite variable when solving for m knot x. However, in other videos I have watched they add the same variable that is it with respect to. Can someone explain this?

  • @paultello1042
    @paultello1042 Před rokem +5

    Clark Kent teaches math? Since when?

  • @ISLAMguidanceful
    @ISLAMguidanceful Před 8 lety

    question: at 24:00 prof. Leonard says that the difference between the second moment of inertia and the first moment of area in the x direction is that the "y" is squared, well my first question is if y resembles a distance in the y direction they why is it multiplied and not just added? my other question is why is it just squared in the second moment of inertia? Thank you very much.

    • @carultch
      @carultch Před rokem +1

      The answer to why is definition. First moment means we multiply by distance from a reference point. Second moment means we multiply by distance from a reference point to the second power.
      If you are looking to why we define it this way in the context of an application, the reason is that the distance from the reference point impacts the results in two ways. For the area "moment of inertia", or second moment of area, there are two reasons why distance from the reference axis plays a role. The top and bottom fibers are strained the most as a consequence of bending the beam. And on top of that, the top and bottom fibers contribute the most to opposing the bending moment, since they have the greatest leverage.

  • @tomctutor
    @tomctutor Před 3 lety

    Just saying, engineering usually denote second moment (gyration) by a "k".

  • @anangelsdiaries
    @anangelsdiaries Před rokem

    Note for the very last number, I got 5957.595 , rounded up it gives the same thing but yeah.

  • @kaustavmukherjee3794
    @kaustavmukherjee3794 Před 3 lety

    Too handsome teacher! 🤭🤭🤭😁

  • @ianhnizdo4787
    @ianhnizdo4787 Před 4 lety

    Mass of a straight line in calc I? Doesn't he mean length of a curve?

  • @Rick_Sanchez_Jr.
    @Rick_Sanchez_Jr. Před 5 lety

    Dangit I wish I would have reviewed this video before my Calc 2 test, there was a slightly different way of doing Center of Mass that I learned with getting the Area first and then x bar is 1/Area times integral xf(x)dx and then y bar = 1/area times integral (1/2)(f(x))^2, but what Professor Leonard showed worked too, so I messed up on that one problem on the test :/

  • @vantaylor9533
    @vantaylor9533 Před 5 lety +2

    40:20 everyone gets woken up

  • @briansilverman216
    @briansilverman216 Před 7 lety +5

    Hey Prof Leonard, what happened to, I think, chapter 14.5 surface area?? Im sad...

    • @ProfessorLeonard
      @ProfessorLeonard  Před 7 lety +8

      Keep watching!!! We skip it for now because it is covered later (and better) in a later section :)

    • @aceyzh00
      @aceyzh00 Před 7 lety +1

      May i know in which section is it being covered?

    • @questionman5
      @questionman5 Před 7 lety

      Also curious as to where Surface Area is covered. You're the best at giving intuition! I figure the semester is over by now, but I couldn't find it. Thank you!

    • @aliticx
      @aliticx Před 6 lety +9

      Just found it, it's with section 15.6

    • @twoezy-vegito5363
      @twoezy-vegito5363 Před 5 lety +1

      @@aliticx much appreciated brother

  • @vidushanhimantha
    @vidushanhimantha Před 2 lety

    Is there any video for the application of integration?

  • @ahmedmohamed-yx1ln
    @ahmedmohamed-yx1ln Před 3 lety

    I looooove you leonard

  • @Leo-vs9dx
    @Leo-vs9dx Před 4 měsíci

    47:00 example 2 ( where i left off)

  • @Ahmed-cr9kv
    @Ahmed-cr9kv Před 7 lety +3

    hey professor leonard, u made a mistake at min 50 , the equation of the second line is wrong , it should be x=-2y+4

  • @whitneyisbell4709
    @whitneyisbell4709 Před 4 lety

    i understand the idea have of how to solve for the mass by taking a double integral of the mass density function p(x,y) but im just lost on were the function p(x,y) actually comes from and what is it detailing ? is it from the density equation density=mass/volume ? and since volume is a double integral and we solve for the mass, do we get m=double integral of density? is this how that equation is derived ?

    • @carultch
      @carultch Před rokem +1

      Mass actually equals triple integral of density. You have a region of space, and there is a given density at every point within it. You make an infinitesimal volume element (dV) in each of the three directions, such that dV = dx dy dz, and multiply this dV by the corresponding density. Add it up (i.e. integrate) along each of the three directions, and you get mass.
      Volume could also be a triple integral, if you are simply integrating 1 dx dy dz. It is a double integral in cases where the value of the integrand, equals a distance quantity, such as the z-position along a region of space in the x and y directions.

    • @everettmcinnis5858
      @everettmcinnis5858 Před 11 měsíci

      Thank you for a clear and concise description.

  • @Peter_1986
    @Peter_1986 Před 2 lety

    Mass moments of inertia are the rotational equivalent of mass;
    a body with high moment of inertia is hard to give a rotational acceleration, just like how a body with high mass is hard to give a linear acceleration. Similarly, an angle is the rotational equivalent of distance, torque is the rotational equivalent of force, and so on.

    • @everettmcinnis5858
      @everettmcinnis5858 Před 11 měsíci

      This is the best comment I have seen to describe the tendency to rotate concept mentioned in the video. I was a little confused by his explanation. Don't get me wrong. I have looked at all of professor Leonard's calculus videos and he is a wonderful teacher who explains things very clearly, and he helped me greatly on my path through mathematics, which is my own path now. No courses pass any more, no pressure. It's all good.

    • @Peter_1986
      @Peter_1986 Před 11 měsíci

      ​@@everettmcinnis5858 Cool. :)
      Yeah, Professor Leonard is truly amazing, for sure - he makes sure that every step of all of his explanations are crystal clear before he moves on, and that is exactly what good teaching is all about.

  • @charmendro
    @charmendro Před 4 lety

    THANKS SO MUCH :)

  • @Brad-qw1te
    @Brad-qw1te Před 4 lety +1

    why is there no 15.5 lecture

  • @0965843
    @0965843 Před 8 lety

    Do any of the these lecture talk about the surface area by double integral? It seems not mentioned in 14.1~14.4.

    • @martovify
      @martovify Před 4 lety

      Previous lecture, around the 2 hour mark

  • @charmendro
    @charmendro Před 4 lety

    Examples start around 27:54

  • @alien77333
    @alien77333 Před 16 dny

    46:55

  • @ellanamatteo7255
    @ellanamatteo7255 Před 2 lety

    Anyone knows where 14.5 is?

  • @kellyjin2469
    @kellyjin2469 Před měsícem

    52:22

  • @uxoy
    @uxoy Před 4 měsíci

    24:48

  • @user-xv9qk3iz7b
    @user-xv9qk3iz7b Před 4 lety +4

    What's the first thing we gonna do? *Give Up*
    -hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  • @Anigmus_
    @Anigmus_ Před 2 lety

    Damn I love math

  • @MohamadDroobi
    @MohamadDroobi Před 7 lety +5

    LAMINA MINA AA AA WAKKA WAKKA AA AA.... Ok ill just get back to the video :)

  • @VickyJIO-jm4yf
    @VickyJIO-jm4yf Před 7 lety

    sir with due respect...i wanna ask that why there is no 14.5 lecture?

    • @ProfessorLeonard
      @ProfessorLeonard  Před 7 lety +7

      Hey there, Lesson 14.5 has to do with Surface Area. It is actually covered later, and in more detail, in a later section. Have fun!

    • @VickyJIO-jm4yf
      @VickyJIO-jm4yf Před 7 lety

      Professor Leonard thank you so much sir have a great day.

  • @FahadQaseem
    @FahadQaseem Před 7 lety

    respect from #pakistan!

  • @JawadAli-tj3ec
    @JawadAli-tj3ec Před 6 lety

    1;05;29 yeah

  • @ashesthomaskulamackel9404

    is there no 14.5 lecture??

    • @Peter_1986
      @Peter_1986 Před 2 lety

      Professor Leonard sometimes skips sections that he thinks are irrelevant for this course, so 14.5 most likely didn't bring up anything important - it was probably something about deriving some particular integral that is used for very specific applications, or something like that.

  • @justinlambright405
    @justinlambright405 Před 7 lety +11

    YOU SHALL NOT PASS! lol...

    • @HScripturez
      @HScripturez Před 4 lety

      That made me love this guy even more LOLLLLL

  • @Seifahmed-qh3sr
    @Seifahmed-qh3sr Před 3 lety

    12:50 "wtf...."

  • @RMA9270
    @RMA9270 Před 7 lety

    60fps

  • @shayorshayorshayor
    @shayorshayorshayor Před 4 lety

    Aw man. He didn't explain probability

  • @rubinglen
    @rubinglen Před 2 měsíci

    can we just skip all this weird physics stuff?

  • @sandlertossone1813
    @sandlertossone1813 Před 8 lety +5

    I don't think he has the juice to do D.EQ or Linear Algebra. He is a pretty smart guy but those two courses require a real understanding of theory and how to teach it. I think he is at his limit. Of course I am saying this in hopes he will take up the challenge cause the other CZcams instructors or college instructors don't have a clue. They may know the subject but they can't hold a candle to this guy when it comes to teaching.

    • @ProfessorLeonard
      @ProfessorLeonard  Před 8 lety +33

      +Sandler Tossone Might do it someday, but it takes ALL I HAVE to video record a series. It is a tremendous undertaking and not something I just do into without some VERY serious preparation. We shall have to see what the future brings.

    • @Bulldog22224
      @Bulldog22224 Před 8 lety

      You are a god +Professor Leanard

    • @ealrada
      @ealrada Před 8 lety +2

      We r all waiting for your Linear Algebra & differential equation lectures! Please Leonard!

    • @fernandoloyola4024
      @fernandoloyola4024 Před 7 lety +6

      I absolutely used to hate calculus. I and II until I came across your cal II videos. I now have an addiction to math. I was able to ace cal II thanks to your videos and took cal III on line since all I needed was your lecture. I took diff equations in person and the professor was pretty much dry and to the point. I actually used your formulas from cal III to define some of the formulas diff equations uses and I drew parallels that way. Thank you very much, I don't even know how you came across teaching, but I wish to eventually teach in the future and I will always refer to you when trying to do hard examples. Thank you!

    • @canman5060
      @canman5060 Před 6 lety +1

      I honestly don't think so. This guy knew Partial Differential Equation when he was 7 years old !

  • @davidmatthews8752
    @davidmatthews8752 Před 3 lety +1

    The aboriginal algeria strangely lighten because pet steadily offend forenenst a minor singer. sharp, cumbersome frost