Especially if you think about the actual size of all of the canyons mountains and valleys that pass by. Even more fun is to think about how many atoms are just in an object like an apple, and then a person, and think of how many persons can fit in those mountains, and how many mountains there are in just this tiny tiny part of earth
Now imagine and contemplate that, not even 200 years ago, people used to have to make a journey of this scale in a wooden wagon. America is astonishingly vast.
This is not true lol. It may seem uninhabitable to a person from a large city, but there are hundreds of towns and thousands of villages, and millions of people live there. The majority of the villagers are making use of Siberia's extremely rich nature to live. This region is just not economically developed, because Russia doesn't have enough money and people to make it look like its European part. But seeing how westerners talk about it, I assume its your media making you believe in "Russia doesn't need it but we do" @@amalayperson7208
REQUEST: If you're ever considering a version 2, please consider placing a label for every significant landmark passed. Examples: Sierra Nevada, Lake Havasu, Grand Canyon, Mississippi River, and so on. It would help to know how far we have travelled, rather than guessing. For your consideration....
@@homerjs225 You can't see Philadelphia in this video, it's too far South. There's a town at 4:52 on the right side of the screen. That is Allentown, PA. The biggest Skyline you can see besides NYC and LA is Pittsburgh from 4:20 - 4:25, just after you fly over the airport.
Realistically this video would actually be upside down, because at Mach 50 you have to have a *negative* angle of attack to maintain altitude due to the curvature of the Earth. You could fly upright with the nose down, but aircraft are usually designed to produce lift more efficiently with a positive angle of attack, which flying inverted lets you do. Moreover, pilots also operate more efficiently in positive gees than negative gees, and following the Earth's curvature at Mach 50 results in the aircraft experiencing around -1.2G So at very high speeds, flying inverted is both more efficient and more comfortable. The 'rollover' speed is around Mach 23 at sea level, depending which direction you're flying.
@@kavithasunilkumarms7423 Yep. If you think about it from the upside-down pilot's point of view, the Earth's surface is constantly curving 'up' away from him, so he also has to pull up to follow it - otherwise he'll fall 'down' into space. I think this is probably the universe's way of telling us that flying that we shouldn't be trying to fly that fast - but when have humans (and especially test pilots) ever done as they're told?
@@RealNeutronStar I mean, realistically speaking, you'd see nothing, or a big jumble of everything at once, as light cannot catch up to your eyes while your receptors cant transmit information to your brain fast enough as the speed of light only goes up to around Mach 874,000.
@@CatWithAOpinion and adding relativity/time dilation to this would make it so that youd feel like it happened instantly no matter the distance you travel
Each of those square fields while over the Great Plains is a quarter section of 160 acres, or half mile x half mile. 4 quarters makes a section 1 mile x 1 mile as all land on the US Plains and Canadian Prairies are surveyed this way. It is crazy to think how fast you go by one of these fields. It usually takes me a whole day to seed or harvest one of those fields.
In today's news, the first hypersonic cross country flight was achieved in 5 min from LA to NYC. In other news, an estimated 121,400 people died today from the sonic pressure wave caused by the hypersonic cross country flight.
I used to be a commercial pilot and this guy is doing the exact route we took. Granted it was like thousands of ft higher but i recognize all these spots
This perspective shows how vast and beautiful North America truly is. So much beauty in that rich, fertile farmland that seems to go on almost forever, the majestic snow-capped mountains, the rivers and streams filled with freshwater life and the deep thick forests that provide shelter to countless birds and animals. Every square mile is worth protecting and cultivating.
To put the speed into perspective, mach 50 is 38,364 mph! However, this still pales in comparison to the speed of a manhole cover that was shot into space by an underground nuke on August 27, 1957. It was estimated to be traveling at a minimum speed of 125,000 mph, which is almost 6X Earth's escape velocity!
@@My-Pal-Hal problem is that you're going so fast that the air doesn't have time to get out of the way, like a shockwave from a detonation, except it's constant and at mach 50 it won't just bend steel on a flat surface, it will be essentially hitting a brick wall of air.
@@kugelblitz1557 The Real Problem Is,.. No $hit 😂 ✌️ 😂 ...but fun. That's one of the reasons why there ain't no Mach 50 Aircraft running around recently. ... that anyone, or any Entities 👽 will admit too 😏 That is funny though. Even saying Mach 50. People don't realize that's Twice As Fast as you need to go, for orbital velocity. Like 38k mph or so. And I'm not even sure if that's statute vs nautical miles 😳 ... damn, where's my slap stick 🖖
@@kugelblitz1557 now I'm just wondering if you had little rods or whatever of brick and steel of the same volume, would the steel bend before the brick breaks? Edit: now that I think about it for a sec it's probably highly temperature dependent
just make a big spear with some kind of super rocket jet on the back, and fill the spear with fuel and lots of space for passengers XD the shockwave would be less that way oh and make sure to fly really high, for minimal air resistance
Flying at twice the escape velocity for Earth's gravity, the plane would have to be upside down so that the passengers felt comfortable in their seats.
@@ernestkhalimov9368 Yes, I know, but I've made a worse mistake. I looked up the radius of the earth. Which is 6,371 km but where I live, we use the comma as decimal point. So without thinking I used a value that's off by 3 orders of magnitude. So the actual acceleration is -3.5 g. which is surprisingly low.
I made the drive from Connecticut to Los Angeles with my (now ex-) wife and dog in 2005 to move out there, and it took just about 5 days. It wasn’t a direct straight line drive like this was, and going the southern route put us on a collision course with Hurricane Katrina. We were both heading for the top of Louisiana and would have converged if I hadn’t decided to try to avoid it- so we couldn’t stay at the hotel that we’d reserved, and since everyone else was evacuating north, it was almost impossible to find a substitute room. I had to drive all the way to North Little Rock, Arkansas to finally find a vacancy, and so I ended up driving 17.5 hours that day. That day and the remainder of the drive really gave me an appreciation for just how large the US actually is, and it was reinforced when I made the drive back in the opposite direction five years later to move back to my home state. Incredible and beautiful scenery, as well, and I’d recommend making a cross country drive to anyone who has the time and opportunity to do it. It’s a treasured memory, especially the drive back when it was just my dog and me- I always enjoyed driving for longer distances, and listening to my favorite music and my thoughts, and with Ajax with me, I didn’t feel lonely even once. This was a great video, and obviously brought up the feeling I experienced of the vastness of the country- thanks for creating and posting this!
I tested my theory with your video with a cup of coffee, and my results were as I had believed.. I would not have enough time to enjoy a cup of coffee during this flight. Great vid!
It’s crazy that just outside LA over the big valley mountains are just endless amounts of desert wasteland, canyons & mountains. It takes weeks to get anywhere out there that’s green till you hit the Mississippi
@@evanhughes1510 most of the states you mentioned are actually yellow/tannish color since it’s mostly wheat fields, farms & dry grasslands out there. The east coast is where it’s more green with trees everywhere. Out west it tends to get more dry & desert. But Missouri & Colorado are pretty green.
@@evanhughes1510 You misunderstood the OP comment. He specifically said TRAVELING FROM L.A. EASTWARD. Yes, Oklahoma is west of the Mississippi but nowhere near the route L.A.-Mississippi.
@@michaelweston409 Yes, but if you're driving L.A.-Mississippi (as the OP implies), the whole landscape is dry af. I've driven solo from Palm Springs to El Paso; it's a looooong stretch of sand, small off-green shrubbery and tan color mountains off in the distance, at least that's how I remember it.
Just for perspective at how fast it's moving, here are three major cities that you can see in this video as you cross West to East in Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh on the western border (skyline is on the right side of the screen after you pass over the airport), State College which is right in the geographic middle of the state (smack up against a mountainside, major highway right on the edge), and Allentown on the eastern border of the state (appears on the right side of the screen as the map shows approaching KABE airport) Pittsburgh, PA at 4:20 State College, PA at 4:33 Allentown, PA at 4:50
This is really cool. I would have liked to have seen an inset map showing where we are at any time though. I see you have that near the end of the video. Also, it would be neat to see a video of special landmarks ie; Mt. Rushmore, St. Louis Arch, Mississippi River, and several big cities. Maybe you could do that ? Awesome video though !
Mach 50 is at a similar speed as the space probe Voyager 1, in which it took 36 years just to leave the solar system after being launched in the year 1977.
no, no, no. This mach 50 technology actively counteracts problems from pushing through air at that speed. In fact, it may be moving through a generated vacuum. If not, the airs can be calmed. Even the sound waves are actively calmed. It's all above your pay grade. But rest assured they aren't simply ramming through air at mach 50 and letting whatever happens happens.
You would actually be fine (from the vortex standpoint, everything else, such as the dynamic pressure, and the heating, not so much), as to fly like this, you would have to be inverted, and pulling over 1G, because this is above twice orbital velocity, so in order to not gain altitude, you have to produce lift downwards, meaning your vortices would be traveling upwards, and not hit the ground.
@@Kinobambino Very true, but you would need a form of hyper- perception or else you'd crash into everything. Maybe that's why time dialates the faster you go.
Fun fact: if you were travelling at the speed of light you would have travelled around the world 2311 times in the time it took you to watch this entire video! 😃
The air resistance going at this speed this close to the ground would toast this aircraft. Typical re-entry speeds are around Mach 25, in the upper atmosphere. This is double that, at around 1-5 thousand feet above the ground. This would create an Insane amount of heat.
why am i sitting here watching this whole video lmao. but it's pretty cool, like it shows how big the US truly is and it's pretty amazing that people used to cross all of this by foot
@@J7Handle i meant that it would be extremely slow in comparison to the scope of the universe bc they said what would that look like in space? so i assumed that question meant outer space
Thanks for the video. With the ground whizzing by at that speed, reminds me and looks like something similar from the movie "2001 space odyssey" near the end of the movie where they do the high speed stuff.
This video is honestly amazing. It shows how simultaneously big and small the world is. Really, it's overwhelming. I'd love to have seen the camera fly completely around the world. Would be good to have that mini-map in that corner the whole time aswell, to show exactly where we are
Put at 0.25 playback speed to see how fast some of the early Hypersonic Missiles (HGV type) could fly at (Mach 12-17). 0.5 for ICBM maximum terminal speeds.
Awesome visualization. It really helps drive home why the earth's surface is considered incredibly smooth at the scales of the width of a continent. When I first read the XKCD about the earth sized bowling ball I was blown away, but this really helps drive home that while some hills may be "Steep" and some cliffs may be "Tall," the whole country, truly the whole Earth, really is flatter than a pancake.
I’ve driven from LA to Colorado and once you hit Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah is just an vast endless ocean of canyons. Big red canyons, beautiful in the early morning as the sun is rising
@@ddd.777- Apollo 10 hit around Mach 40 and had three men onboard, so Mach 50 isn't too far fetched for a manned spacecraft. Realistically though, I can't see anything *flying* faster than about Mach 25 - beyond that you overcome the Earth's gravity and get flung into space. Indeed, there are a number of hypersonic gliders that have gone about that fast - X-23, X-37B, BOR-4S, ASSET, Avangard, ASSET, HTV-2, Space Shuttle, Buran. Apollo was only able to go faster because it started out in space and fell into the atmosphere, and bled off enough speed before getting flung back out.
@@lazarus2691ya, i know that the highest manned speed was over mach 40, but that's in space, in earth atmosphere maximum manned speed is about mach 6, and unmanned for an aircraft in level flight is about mach 20, but this is for a very short period of time, because the rocket engine is not very efficient
I have this kind of dream since childhood where I’m in a small, black triangular craft like, that flies at amazing speeds close to the ground and always takes me to a different country, far, faraway… The flying part looks exactly like this video.
Well, mach 50 would be impossible in an atmosphere. There would simply be too much resistance on an airframe. The SR-71 Blackbird jet required exotic materials to just fly slightly above match 3. The frame was hot enough to vaporize water when it got up to speed. Also, mach 50 would kill or badly hurt anything in the immediate area. The shockwaves alone would level buildings. 😳
@@Maloney-ho6fb You do know that mach 50 is 50 times the speed of sound, right? Outside of an atmosphere, that speed is possible. But the solid matter in an atmosphere would not be able to reach those speeds without breaking apart immediately. Currently, as far as any of us know, we don't have any super science that will allow us to defy physics.
@@modemmack And not to mention the fact that Mach 50 is something like 38,000 mph, which is almost 1.5 times the escape velocity. One small misjudgment and you're going into space, and you're not coming back.
you probabily wouldnt be able to see anything in the first place as the friction would turn the air hitting whatever your flying into red/orange plasma, maybe its possible to see out of the back of your craft, but then most of what you could see would be a huge trench a few kilometers wide caused by the shockwaves condensing and devastating anything in their path...
@@mikechurvis9995 But in order to achieve Earth’s escape velocity, the probe had to travel at over Mach 40. So yeah, we technically did get up to that speed just planets helped us a tiny bit.
@@baileyharrison1030 Well getting to that speed in the air is impossible. You would burn up long before you get there as you push 4000 degrees. Even then, if you went at that speed at earth's surface, the surface would bend away from you and you would be flung into space.
Being an observer on the ground watching this fly over would literally be a blink and you'll miss it moment, unless you know exactly WHERE and WHEN to look.
Wow. The higher altitude level makes this a lot more watchable than your previous videos. Be good to inset a small map in the top corner to show the progress across the various states, mountain ranges and cities and towns as well.
Reminds me of the star gate sequence from 2001, with the landscapes in different colours and contrasts. Another thought I would have is that the ISS orbits at less than half this speed. Unfathomably fast.
I wish you would do one with the map always showing or mention where the way points are. I wondered when you crossed the Mississippi (2:36?). I also saw few larger urban areas flash underneath.
This video is only 5 minutes long, that's mean it shown flying with Mach 150 . Distance from Los Angeles to New York is 2,445 miles. Mach 50 speed is 38,250 miles/hr . So It would take 15.6 minutes from L.A. To NY
@@atlas-3541 wow. Yeah imagine how they can do that speed underwater lol. Just wow. I bet 30 is just a speed they do to ensure they don't wreck with our junk in the air. I'm pretty sure that if real they can travel far faster than shown here in the video.
Fun fact, at mach 50, the wings would have to provide significant DOWNWARD thrust to maintain altitude. Mach 50 is well above orbital speed. A rough estimate, you'd be experiencing about 2.7 G's UPWARD against the top of the plane. (assuming a flight speed of about 34,000 mph). So take off normally, accelerate and at some point, turn the plane over and fly most of the way, upside down pressed into your seat with 2.7 times your own weight. Nice thrill ride, but not sure most passengers would enjoy it.
Fun fact: at Mach 50, you need to have lift that point downwards because your centripetal acceleration exceeds the gravitational acceleration from Earth. 17km/s is about twice the orbital velocity (meaning you need about 3G to press down) or 40% more than Earth’s escape velocity.
@@Chuked lol even the ISS travels at 17,000 mph. Plenty can space crafts in outer space can travel FASTER than ICBM as well. ICBM do go to outer space as well, and that's why it's capable of going that fast. If ICBM travel that fast at sea level it probably would've disintegrated within a few sec. As well as any other space rockets.
i was surprised by all the desert in the west, and the east being a lot more green than the west. and it looked like they didn't have any trees until close to east coast.
Even if Mach 50 airliners were in common use. It would still take hours because of the delays at Kennedy and LAX
And Pearson
What does mach 1000000 look like in space? 🔥
@@sacredprovenance Fr, every time I’ve flown this year it’s be at least an hour delay each time
@@RealNeutronStar That's 1.2 times the speed of light, so a bit faster than light but impossible
Yeah, technology can only do so much when 95% of the population does not have much more acute usable intelligence than a German shepherd.
Puts into perspective how big the earth is. But small at the same time.
Especially if you think about the actual size of all of the canyons mountains and valleys that pass by. Even more fun is to think about how many atoms are just in an object like an apple, and then a person, and think of how many persons can fit in those mountains, and how many mountains there are in just this tiny tiny part of earth
and how slow regular planes are
@@dryoutuube if the Concorde was just still flying..
What does mach 1000000 look like in space? 🔥
@@mustsee715 Concorde flys at 1,300 mph MAXIMUM speed. This video was at 38,000 mph.
Now imagine and contemplate that, not even 200 years ago, people used to have to make a journey of this scale in a wooden wagon. America is astonishingly vast.
@@justaguywholovesplanes but a majority of Russia's terrain is uninhabitable: too rugged and too harsh for a regular person to live.
@@amalayperson7208 Well they aren't orang biasa... Lmao...
@@amalayperson7208not for much longer
This is not true lol. It may seem uninhabitable to a person from a large city, but there are hundreds of towns and thousands of villages, and millions of people live there. The majority of the villagers are making use of Siberia's extremely rich nature to live. This region is just not economically developed, because Russia doesn't have enough money and people to make it look like its European part. But seeing how westerners talk about it, I assume its your media making you believe in "Russia doesn't need it but we do" @@amalayperson7208
@@amalayperson7208And temperatures of -50 fahrenheit in parts of Siberia
REQUEST: If you're ever considering a version 2, please consider placing a label for every significant landmark passed. Examples: Sierra Nevada, Lake Havasu, Grand Canyon, Mississippi River, and so on. It would help to know how far we have travelled, rather than guessing. For your consideration....
Perhaps even entry into each state.
I think the most played back section was Philadelphia. I recognize skyline
Nah just know your geography!
@@homerjs225 You can't see Philadelphia in this video, it's too far South. There's a town at 4:52 on the right side of the screen. That is Allentown, PA.
The biggest Skyline you can see besides NYC and LA is Pittsburgh from 4:20 - 4:25, just after you fly over the airport.
... Or at least have the VFR map visible for the entire clip. (Very cool regardless!)
Realistically this video would actually be upside down, because at Mach 50 you have to have a *negative* angle of attack to maintain altitude due to the curvature of the Earth.
You could fly upright with the nose down, but aircraft are usually designed to produce lift more efficiently with a positive angle of attack, which flying inverted lets you do.
Moreover, pilots also operate more efficiently in positive gees than negative gees, and following the Earth's curvature at Mach 50 results in the aircraft experiencing around -1.2G
So at very high speeds, flying inverted is both more efficient and more comfortable. The 'rollover' speed is around Mach 23 at sea level, depending which direction you're flying.
Mind blown. Really shows how things as extreme as this aren't as simple as they seem
@@kavithasunilkumarms7423 Yep. If you think about it from the upside-down pilot's point of view, the Earth's surface is constantly curving 'up' away from him, so he also has to pull up to follow it - otherwise he'll fall 'down' into space.
I think this is probably the universe's way of telling us that flying that we shouldn't be trying to fly that fast - but when have humans (and especially test pilots) ever done as they're told?
Got it. I’d turn my screen upside down.
My guy was enrolled into top gun
Or you would just built a wing that cambers in the other direction to generate "negative lift" and avoid all the inverted flying?
This is how I imagined flight as a child... Like a 747 just doing this.
What does mach 1000000 look like in space? 🔥
@@RealNeutronStar I mean, realistically speaking, you'd see nothing, or a big jumble of everything at once, as light cannot catch up to your eyes while your receptors cant transmit information to your brain fast enough as the speed of light only goes up to around Mach 874,000.
@@CatWithAOpinion and adding relativity/time dilation to this would make it so that youd feel like it happened instantly no matter the distance you travel
@@RealNeutronStar stars in front of you will appear blue, stars behind you will appear red or disappear (redshifts beyond visible)
@@RealNeutronStar 1.14 times more than the speed of light
Ok, but being Superman still isn’t as nice as first class.
Chocolate rain
Some say dry...
Some say dry
and others feel the pain (lil jon beat remix beat begins)
ok
do you still breathe away from the mic
Each of those square fields while over the Great Plains is a quarter section of 160 acres, or half mile x half mile. 4 quarters makes a section 1 mile x 1 mile as all land on the US Plains and Canadian Prairies are surveyed this way.
It is crazy to think how fast you go by one of these fields. It usually takes me a whole day to seed or harvest one of those fields.
In today's news, the first hypersonic cross country flight was achieved in 5 min from LA to NYC.
In other news, an estimated 121,400 people died today from the sonic pressure wave caused by the hypersonic cross country flight.
Lmao
pretty sure the air would be plasma too
casualties of science XD
in all seriousness i wonder if theres anyway to prevent the problems mach 50 would have on the surrounding environment
HAHAHA
will this still happen at high altitudes?
I used to be a commercial pilot and this guy is doing the exact route we took. Granted it was like thousands of ft higher but i recognize all these spots
hi fellow furry
oh god a furry pilot 🤮
@@omeiga It terrifies me that whenever I get on a plane, my pilot could secretly be a furry. I'd never know. Gives me chills
Lol y'all disrespectful as fuck.💀
God himself would send radiation towards your plane and confuses its computer angle of attack, dives right into the Grand Canyon and crash.
The speed of light just said, 'hold my beer' and did that trip in 000.1 % of that time.
Actually the speed of light does it in 000.00487% of that time.
This perspective shows how vast and beautiful North America truly is. So much beauty in that rich, fertile farmland that seems to go on almost forever, the majestic snow-capped mountains, the rivers and streams filled with freshwater life and the deep thick forests that provide shelter to countless birds and animals. Every square mile is worth protecting and cultivating.
I'm amazed how big the Grand Canyon is, in this video it took a good 20 seconds or so to clear it.
Well it is Grand after all
Timestamp?
@@DayTripTookItTo10 start of the video about a minute of so in
while traveling at around 10.5 miles per second
@@zionchar11 Technically right.
To put the speed into perspective, mach 50 is 38,364 mph! However, this still pales in comparison to the speed of a manhole cover that was shot into space by an underground nuke on August 27, 1957. It was estimated to be traveling at a minimum speed of 125,000 mph, which is almost 6X Earth's escape velocity!
next week a DarkDocs ep will drop with this as the title.
Legend says it is stil out there ready to destroy a country size area of land
@@Blitz_maniac It could be lodged in one of Jupiter's moons for all we know!
Dr. Brownlee, who did the calculation, didn't take Earth's atmosphere into account. It was more than likely vaporized in the atmosphere.
@@W1se0ldg33zerMaybe, but no one knows for sure.
This literally flew over my house. Trippy.
So nice to see a clear view of Mach 50, it’s so hard to keep my eyes open at that speed I never get to truly appreciate the view.
Flying Mach 50 in sea level atmosphere would be a fairly indistinguishable experience from flying Mach 50 straight into the ground.
You did activate your Anti-Grav on your Mach 50 Aircraft,.. didn't you 😳
... amateur 😂
@@My-Pal-Hal problem is that you're going so fast that the air doesn't have time to get out of the way, like a shockwave from a detonation, except it's constant and at mach 50 it won't just bend steel on a flat surface, it will be essentially hitting a brick wall of air.
@@kugelblitz1557
The Real Problem Is,..
No $hit 😂 ✌️ 😂 ...but fun.
That's one of the reasons why there ain't no Mach 50 Aircraft running around recently.
... that anyone, or any Entities 👽 will admit too 😏
That is funny though.
Even saying Mach 50.
People don't realize that's Twice As Fast as you need to go, for orbital velocity. Like 38k mph or so. And I'm not even sure if that's statute vs nautical miles 😳
... damn, where's my slap stick 🖖
@@kugelblitz1557
To be honest.
The Real Problem, is at those speeds,.. czcams.com/video/g1pahozFjK0/video.html
@@kugelblitz1557 now I'm just wondering if you had little rods or whatever of brick and steel of the same volume, would the steel bend before the brick breaks?
Edit: now that I think about it for a sec it's probably highly temperature dependent
At this speed, you could circumnavigate the earth in about 38 minutes
Telling the guy what video he should do next I see
Now I need a 38 minutes flight in 360 of all the continents
@@nix324 based profile
So all 196,000,000 sq miles? I don't know about that.
It's none of any of your business what he chooses to circumcise.
Thanks for spending the time to create and share this content 🤙🏾
I watched at playback speed x2 , so Mach 100 I guess...
(great video!)
I'm just imagining the trail of shattered windows and eardrums this trip would leave in its wake.
Nevermind windows and eardrums, I'm imagining the wake similar to what you get from flying low over water, just impressed straight into solid ground
I don't know if any life outside bacteria would survive the wake. Shattered windows 1000 miles in each direction outside of it.
The shock wave is probably a nuclear bomb
just make a big spear with some kind of super rocket jet on the back, and fill the spear with fuel and lots of space for passengers XD the shockwave would be less that way
oh and make sure to fly really high, for minimal air resistance
more that that. It would blow down buildings and throw people around like leaves in a hurricane.
Flying at twice the escape velocity for Earth's gravity, the plane would have to be upside down so that the passengers felt comfortable in their seats.
More like getting crushed by almost 3500 g
@@fetsexe2274 -1g
@@fetsexe2274 no it would be negative g as they ll be constantly falling from the earth's curvature.
@@ernestkhalimov9368 Yes, I know, but I've made a worse mistake. I looked up the radius of the earth. Which is 6,371 km but where I live, we use the comma as decimal point. So without thinking I used a value that's off by 3 orders of magnitude. So the actual acceleration is -3.5 g. which is surprisingly low.
@@fetsexe2274-3.5 is not low at all. You will pass out from that in a few seconds, all the blood will go up in your brain
I made the drive from Connecticut to Los Angeles with my (now ex-) wife and dog in 2005 to move out there, and it took just about 5 days. It wasn’t a direct straight line drive like this was, and going the southern route put us on a collision course with Hurricane Katrina. We were both heading for the top of Louisiana and would have converged if I hadn’t decided to try to avoid it- so we couldn’t stay at the hotel that we’d reserved, and since everyone else was evacuating north, it was almost impossible to find a substitute room. I had to drive all the way to North Little Rock, Arkansas to finally find a vacancy, and so I ended up driving 17.5 hours that day. That day and the remainder of the drive really gave me an appreciation for just how large the US actually is, and it was reinforced when I made the drive back in the opposite direction five years later to move back to my home state. Incredible and beautiful scenery, as well, and I’d recommend making a cross country drive to anyone who has the time and opportunity to do it. It’s a treasured memory, especially the drive back when it was just my dog and me- I always enjoyed driving for longer distances, and listening to my favorite music and my thoughts, and with Ajax with me, I didn’t feel lonely even once. This was a great video, and obviously brought up the feeling I experienced of the vastness of the country- thanks for creating and posting this!
So in a word or two,, Plane be Fast .
I tested my theory with your video with a cup of coffee,
and my results were as I had believed..
I would not have enough time to enjoy a cup of coffee during this flight.
Great vid!
huge props to the cameraman for travelling 50 times faster than the speed of sound
What?
@@dragonflyfab9703 FeelsDankMan 👂 📣what?
@@dragonflyfab9703 r/whoosh
@@dangdrjay3011 💀💀Nahh my guy use Twitch emote in YT.
No plane have travelled faster than sound.
They have only travelled as fast
It’s crazy that just outside LA over the big valley mountains are just endless amounts of desert wasteland, canyons & mountains. It takes weeks to get anywhere out there that’s green till you hit the Mississippi
Not true. Plenty of green in most states west of the mississippi, especially Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, colorado, Utah, Kansas, etc.
@@evanhughes1510 most of the states you mentioned are actually yellow/tannish color since it’s mostly wheat fields, farms & dry grasslands out there. The east coast is where it’s more green with trees everywhere. Out west it tends to get more dry & desert. But Missouri & Colorado are pretty green.
@@evanhughes1510 You misunderstood the OP comment. He specifically said TRAVELING FROM L.A. EASTWARD. Yes, Oklahoma is west of the Mississippi but nowhere near the route L.A.-Mississippi.
@@michaelweston409 Yes, but if you're driving L.A.-Mississippi (as the OP implies), the whole landscape is dry af. I've driven solo from Palm Springs to El Paso; it's a looooong stretch of sand, small off-green shrubbery and tan color mountains off in the distance, at least that's how I remember it.
@@RogueReplicant I understood what he said, and I’m saying there’s plenty green way before you get close to the Mississippi
This is how fast i imagines a regular commercial airliner cruise speed would be as seen on ground level
Just for perspective at how fast it's moving, here are three major cities that you can see in this video as you cross West to East in Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh on the western border (skyline is on the right side of the screen after you pass over the airport), State College which is right in the geographic middle of the state (smack up against a mountainside, major highway right on the edge), and Allentown on the eastern border of the state (appears on the right side of the screen as the map shows approaching KABE airport)
Pittsburgh, PA at 4:20
State College, PA at 4:33
Allentown, PA at 4:50
They really need to make a free roam Super Man Game where you can fly all over the world like this. Maybe even go over 100X Mach
it's called Google Earth VR
Look up Megaton Rainfall. Very very fun little game. And it supports VR.
Just put this video in a editing app and make the speed 2x
is basically called msfs bc theres also a mode where you can move freely
Megaton Rainfall
This video would be great with a the map up permanently, to both put some size perspective and especially see changing landscapes.
Please add this creator, for reference
This is really cool. I would have liked to have seen an inset map showing where we are at any time though. I see you have that near the end of the video. Also, it would be neat to see a video of special landmarks ie; Mt. Rushmore, St. Louis Arch, Mississippi River, and several big cities. Maybe you could do that ? Awesome video though !
Fascinating …….thanks for sharing !
I played it at 2x speed and got to see what mach 100 looks like!
There's always somebody..... 😁
GENIUS
So, what happens if we put a camera on an object traveling half the speed of light and then played it at 2x?? 😮
@@guillegermo9406 The universe implodes and we all die. Thanks Guille! 😆
I used 8x
Mach 50 is at a similar speed as the space probe Voyager 1, in which it took 36 years just to leave the solar system after being launched in the year 1977.
Did it reach the degaboh system?
Voyage is going about 3x that speed
From Star Trek 1? Cool.
@@ccculture9681 No. Voyager 1 speed is 61500 km/h , mach 50 is 59,634 km/h.
@@TheFailedmessiah to the Dagaobah system it did go..
This video feels like what Superman sees on a daily basis.
Thank you for the experience 😊
Very cool . Would have been nice to see the VFR map for the entire trip . Is there an app for these to use while traveling on a commercial airliner ?
I like to think the vortex given by this speed is just destroying everything behind the camera
no, no, no. This mach 50 technology actively counteracts problems from pushing through air at that speed. In fact, it may be moving through a generated vacuum. If not, the airs can be calmed. Even the sound waves are actively calmed. It's all above your pay grade. But rest assured they aren't simply ramming through air at mach 50 and letting whatever happens happens.
not to mention the fact anyone in line of sight of it would be blinded by the fireball it would create
@@Jermain-cz4bh yeah, it would be a mini sun, ball of plasma shooting across the sky burning out all retinas in the vicinity
You would actually be fine (from the vortex standpoint, everything else, such as the dynamic pressure, and the heating, not so much), as to fly like this, you would have to be inverted, and pulling over 1G, because this is above twice orbital velocity, so in order to not gain altitude, you have to produce lift downwards, meaning your vortices would be traveling upwards, and not hit the ground.
That was fascinating. And, surprisingly slower than I thought Mach 50 would look like.
It's actually really fast but looks slower because most the areas are barren land so its harder to comprehend how much space he has travelled
Its 18km/s speed.
It's faster if you imagine you're running at that speed
@@Kinobambino Very true, but you would need a form of hyper- perception or else you'd crash into everything. Maybe that's why time dialates the faster you go.
@@Kinobambino my name is Barry Allen
It's fascinating to see the landscape change so suddenly and drastically.
Fun fact: if you were travelling at the speed of light you would have travelled around the world 2311 times in the time it took you to watch this entire video! 😃
lol wot
That's not even from the sun to earth so slow smh😤
Apparently you did the math seven times a second
🤓
Wasn't fun at all
The air resistance going at this speed this close to the ground would toast this aircraft. Typical re-entry speeds are around Mach 25, in the upper atmosphere. This is double that, at around 1-5 thousand feet above the ground. This would create an Insane amount of heat.
But would it melt a Big Mac? Humph.
“But can you fix the seat?”
“Compliance”
Sweet view! Made me think of what a “tic tac” would see in 1st gear going across America 🇺🇸
This is fast an all but the leap from multi month covered wagon to 5 hr flight while binge watching Netflix is still mind boggling.
On the larger scale of human existence, it really is astounding
why am i sitting here watching this whole video lmao.
but it's pretty cool, like it shows how big the US truly is and it's pretty amazing that people used to cross all of this by foot
What does mach 1000000 look like in space? 🔥
@@RealNeutronStar very slow lmao
@@RealNeutronStar 1 mach is speed of sound in air. In space there’s infinitesimal small amount of air or atoms, so mach means nothing.
@@jjraga Very slow? That's a little faster than light. Granted, depending on what you mean by "space", you could still call light speed slow.
@@J7Handle i meant that it would be extremely slow in comparison to the scope of the universe bc they said what would that look like in space? so i assumed that question meant outer space
Thanks for the video. With the ground whizzing by at that speed, reminds me and looks like something similar from the movie "2001 space odyssey" near the end of the movie where they do the high speed stuff.
This is a really cool video. Imaging the heat being generated by the friction, it would be a giant fireball.
This video is honestly amazing. It shows how simultaneously big and small the world is. Really, it's overwhelming. I'd love to have seen the camera fly completely around the world. Would be good to have that mini-map in that corner the whole time aswell, to show exactly where we are
Put at 0.25 playback speed to see how fast some of the early Hypersonic Missiles (HGV type) could fly at (Mach 12-17).
0.5 for ICBM maximum terminal speeds.
holy shit
Awesome visualization. It really helps drive home why the earth's surface is considered incredibly smooth at the scales of the width of a continent. When I first read the XKCD about the earth sized bowling ball I was blown away, but this really helps drive home that while some hills may be "Steep" and some cliffs may be "Tall," the whole country, truly the whole Earth, really is flatter than a pancake.
I don’t know how to say this but this flys directly over my house. If you pause it right at the right time you can see it
I’ve driven from LA to Colorado and once you hit Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah is just an vast endless ocean of canyons. Big red canyons, beautiful in the early morning as the sun is rising
It's endless.. if you're going mach 50.
Maybe one day we will reach that speed, but a little beat higher.
my mind is telling me they already have something similar with that type of technology its just kept classified
Idk maybe ballistic missiles, but no way for something manned
@@melvincee that’s actually kinda true…the amount of stuff that is classified that we don’t know about is probably a LOT of stuff
@@ddd.777- Apollo 10 hit around Mach 40 and had three men onboard, so Mach 50 isn't too far fetched for a manned spacecraft.
Realistically though, I can't see anything *flying* faster than about Mach 25 - beyond that you overcome the Earth's gravity and get flung into space.
Indeed, there are a number of hypersonic gliders that have gone about that fast - X-23, X-37B, BOR-4S, ASSET, Avangard, ASSET, HTV-2, Space Shuttle, Buran.
Apollo was only able to go faster because it started out in space and fell into the atmosphere, and bled off enough speed before getting flung back out.
@@lazarus2691ya, i know that the highest manned speed was over mach 40, but that's in space, in earth atmosphere maximum manned speed is about mach 6, and unmanned for an aircraft in level flight is about mach 20, but this is for a very short period of time, because the rocket engine is not very efficient
I have this kind of dream since childhood where I’m in a small, black triangular craft like, that flies at amazing speeds close to the ground and always takes me to a different country, far, faraway…
The flying part looks exactly like this video.
Looks like my trip to Starbuck's every morning!
Well, mach 50 would be impossible in an atmosphere. There would simply be too much resistance on an airframe. The SR-71 Blackbird jet required exotic materials to just fly slightly above match 3. The frame was hot enough to vaporize water when it got up to speed.
Also, mach 50 would kill or badly hurt anything in the immediate area. The shockwaves alone would level buildings. 😳
Get real. That plane is 50 years old at least. There’s no telling what we have now
Don't use the word impossible.
@@Maloney-ho6fb You do know that mach 50 is 50 times the speed of sound, right? Outside of an atmosphere, that speed is possible. But the solid matter in an atmosphere would not be able to reach those speeds without breaking apart immediately. Currently, as far as any of us know, we don't have any super science that will allow us to defy physics.
@@modemmack And not to mention the fact that Mach 50 is something like 38,000 mph, which is almost 1.5 times the escape velocity. One small misjudgment and you're going into space, and you're not coming back.
I can't imagine anything hot enough to vaporize water, as I'm steaming veggies on my stove and microwave 😅
This is what I expected a regular airliner’s speed to look like close to the ground
props to the cameraman for recording this stuff and being so still at mach 50
Mach 50 seems to induce texture buffering.
you probabily wouldnt be able to see anything in the first place as the friction would turn the air hitting whatever your flying into red/orange plasma, maybe its possible to see out of the back of your craft, but then most of what you could see would be a huge trench a few kilometers wide caused by the shockwaves condensing and devastating anything in their path...
No, no, no. This technology actively counteracts all those issues. Use your imagination
The fact that the this video is 5 minutes long goes to show that the United States of America is a big ass country
Interesting. Thanks for sharing!
Mach 50...Speed of the Voyager 1 spacecraft.
And yet people say “I hope we will get up to that speed” even though we did that in the 70s.
A speed we attained by exploiting a once-in-a-lifetime slingshot maneuver involving *multiple planets*
@@mikechurvis9995 But in order to achieve Earth’s escape velocity, the probe had to travel at over Mach 40. So yeah, we technically did get up to that speed just planets helped us a tiny bit.
@@joaquinchavez9143 It’s a lot easier to go fast when there’s no air to push through
@@baileyharrison1030 Well getting to that speed in the air is impossible. You would burn up long before you get there as you push 4000 degrees. Even then, if you went at that speed at earth's surface, the surface would bend away from you and you would be flung into space.
New York came and went in about 3 and a half seconds
Being an observer on the ground watching this fly over would literally be a blink and you'll miss it moment, unless you know exactly WHERE and WHEN to look.
Congrats on the 100.000 subs
Imagine the speed of light, it does 7 world tours within 1 sec, yet requires 8 mins to reach earth from sun. 🤯
4 years to reach Proxima Centauri
Wow. The higher altitude level makes this a lot more watchable than your previous videos. Be good to inset a small map in the top corner to show the progress across the various states, mountain ranges and cities and towns as well.
That really makes you realise just how slow sound travels.
I like that the progress bar is about where the plane would be in the country
The last 30 second was the approximate course of my commercial long cross country flight. It took 6.5 hours to complete (both ways).
Hats off to the camera man for traveling at this speed! Wouldn't have realised the speed otherwise.
Reminds me of the star gate sequence from 2001, with the landscapes in different colours and contrasts. Another thought I would have is that the ISS orbits at less than half this speed. Unfathomably fast.
I like the little map near the end I would like to see that all the way through give you an idea of where you are But yes overall very cool thanks
Even mach 5 would be such a luxury turning long flights into at most a few hours
I wish you would do one with the map always showing or mention where the way points are. I wondered when you crossed the Mississippi (2:36?). I also saw few larger urban areas flash underneath.
It took me a while to find out what this was but this is Tuttle Creek Lake in Kansas.
This video is only 5 minutes long, that's mean it shown flying with Mach 150 . Distance from Los Angeles to New York is 2,445 miles. Mach 50 speed is 38,250 miles/hr . So It would take 15.6 minutes from L.A. To NY
Wow I actually thought it would look faster than that. Not knocking the video, it's fantastic.
I may not be an astrophysicist, but I can recognize speeds over the Earth's escape velocity when I see them
Haven't UAPs/UFOs been clocked at these speeds and faster? Simply amazing
Around Mach 30, imagine exploring planets at such speeds. Or even the ocean.
@@atlas-3541 wow. Yeah imagine how they can do that speed underwater lol. Just wow. I bet 30 is just a speed they do to ensure they don't wreck with our junk in the air. I'm pretty sure that if real they can travel far faster than shown here in the video.
I would recommend a 0 altitude rise with high barrier winds that cross the longitude sphere when mapping spec points on the virtual grounds.
Fun fact, at mach 50, the wings would have to provide significant DOWNWARD thrust to maintain altitude. Mach 50 is well above orbital speed. A rough estimate, you'd be experiencing about 2.7 G's UPWARD against the top of the plane. (assuming a flight speed of about 34,000 mph). So take off normally, accelerate and at some point, turn the plane over and fly most of the way, upside down pressed into your seat with 2.7 times your own weight. Nice thrill ride, but not sure most passengers would enjoy it.
I like it. I wish if you could for a follow up have a separate map image showing the position corresponding to the point of view imagery.
Fun fact: at Mach 50, you need to have lift that point downwards because your centripetal acceleration exceeds the gravitational acceleration from Earth. 17km/s is about twice the orbital velocity (meaning you need about 3G to press down) or 40% more than Earth’s escape velocity.
Thanks to the cameraman who manage to do such job
Finally, a worthy opponent for my Camaro. Our battle will be legendary.
its crazy how detailed the Environment is
its mostly just satelite imagery
It is actual classified american footage of mach 50
Mach 50 is 38,000 mph!! That is MUCH FASTER than even the ICBM!! ICBM travels at like only 15,000 mph.
Oh my 😳
ICBM is nuke rocket right?
@@thomasholierhoek4012 ICBM stands for InterContinental Ballistic Missile that can carry nuclear warheads yes.
@@prandomable so i turned the video to 0.5x , the ICBM is still INSANELY fast!!! Nuclear war is terrifying
@@Chuked lol even the ISS travels at 17,000 mph. Plenty can space crafts in outer space can travel FASTER than ICBM as well. ICBM do go to outer space as well, and that's why it's capable of going that fast. If ICBM travel that fast at sea level it probably would've disintegrated within a few sec. As well as any other space rockets.
That plane has dope acceleration from LA to NYC snap in a speed per hr that's impressive ngl.
the aircraft controller in every zone they pass spiting their coffee out
What's the maximum speed an object can reach above sea level before starting to burnout due to airfriction?
do light speed next lol
Would be pretty much instant
@@ohmygoshitscole yeah
@@ohmygoshitscole still would be cool tho
Considering you can go around the planet like eight times in one second at light speed...
The vid would be less than a second(just for one rotation around the earth)
I think this could be a visual metaphor for time as you get older.
Mach 50, full speed on limits
Nobody:
Tom Cruise:
- Just a little bit...
Thanks for your video. An occasion landmark label and/or state boundaries would be helpful.
i was surprised by all the desert in the west, and the east being a lot more green than the west. and it looked like they didn't have any trees until close to east coast.
Awsome flying dream!
Seems both amazingly fast, yet weirdly slower than you'd think.
Very nice!
Please do one doing LA to LA or Miami to Miami around the World. East to West and then North to South.
Great idea! Pole to pole. North to South. That would be amazing to see the curvature of the Earth in HD video.
Hmmm… seeing this makes me think Superman in Man of Steel may have actually flown at 50+ Match… it looks very similar to some of his scenes.