@@enebz3746 gaurentee the person in the TOC will automatically correct the person saying AF grid. Less words mean less transmission time, there for the initial trans of the fire mission and the last sentence should be less then 40 seconds all together. Then the GL can get rds down range ASAP. People that usually say AF grid are scouts or CaVsCoUtS. I automatically correct them when they come over the radio.
Around 6:51 you start talking about corrections yes you can correct based off of your mils but it's relative to yoru Mil relation formula. OT is the observer target line in relation to said target. For instance lets say I see a squad of Infantry in the open at a range of 2000 meters which gives me an OT factor of 2. I see the round land lets say 50L. Your first correction will be 100R or 100 right. That first correction will bring you back on line in terms of a lateral correction. BDA or battle damage assement is more for the S2 to ensure that there tracking what's being taken out. He briefly talks about a polar mission, unless the FDC know's where you are most of the time in ROTC you'll just do a grid mission. W = R x mils W= Lateral shift in meters R= Estimated OT distance divided by 1,000s and expressed (OT Factor) m = Angular deviation in mils
Don't say something is awful and not elaborate what he could improve on. Terrible input on your end for not giving clear and concise instruction of improvement.
You do not need to say AF Grid. Just say AF over. The fires cell/FDC/gun line will know what your talking about.
When you are working with other nations in NATO, you want to be as precise as possible. That is why AF Grid should be said...
@@enebz3746 gaurentee the person in the TOC will automatically correct the person saying AF grid. Less words mean less transmission time, there for the initial trans of the fire mission and the last sentence should be less then 40 seconds all together. Then the GL can get rds down range ASAP. People that usually say AF grid are scouts or CaVsCoUtS. I automatically correct them when they come over the radio.
Thank you, this was actually very useful to me, great video.
Around 6:51 you start talking about corrections yes you can correct based off of your mils but it's relative to yoru Mil relation formula. OT is the observer target line in relation to said target. For instance lets say I see a squad of Infantry in the open at a range of 2000 meters which gives me an OT factor of 2. I see the round land lets say 50L. Your first correction will be 100R or 100 right. That first correction will bring you back on line in terms of a lateral correction. BDA or battle damage assement is more for the S2 to ensure that there tracking what's being taken out. He briefly talks about a polar mission, unless the FDC know's where you are most of the time in ROTC you'll just do a grid mission.
W = R x mils
W= Lateral shift in meters
R= Estimated OT distance divided by 1,000s
and expressed (OT Factor)
m = Angular deviation in mils
great video!
Great video
From Iraq 🇮🇶 thank you 😊
This doesnt need to be on CZcams, read a .30
This was god awful instruction. A lot of improvement needed for this…
Don't say something is awful and not elaborate what he could improve on. Terrible input on your end for not giving clear and concise instruction of improvement.
@@MLGLMNTRIXExactly. “Don’t present a problem if you’re not going to propose a solution.”