Segment Routing: SR-MPLS, SRv6 and SRm6
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 07. 2024
- This video provides an overview of Segment Routing’s 3 forwarding planes: SR-MPLS, SRv6 and SRm6. For more information about segment routing, visit www.juniper.net/sr
More videos on Segment Routing:
Segment Routing Fundamentals: • Segment Routing Fundam...
Segment Routing Benefits: • Segment Routing Benefits
Segment Routing Controller Overview: • Segment Routing Contro...
Blogs related to Segment Routing:
SR-What you need to know: juni.pr/2SZCPcq
Segment Routing: Policies, Paths and Segments: juni.pr/37Cr8fy
Segment Routing (SR) With Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS): juni.pr/2N2Nv6h
Segment Routing (SR) and Traffic Engineering (TE): Part One: juni.pr/2T0QtvM
Segment Routing (SR) And Traffic Engineering (TE): Part Two: juni.pr/2ZV6ZyV
Webinars:
Delivering on the promise of Segment Routing: juni.pr/2N25ny3
SR's use cases with this webinar on Delivering SR with SRover6, SRv6 and SRm6: juni.pr/39MZxdu - Věda a technologie
Thanks Ron Bonica you are very helpful
Really well done! Thanks!
Thanks Ron, that is helpful!
Nice Video!
Bravo...
Hi
Ron,
SRv6 uses ipv6 which is 40 Bytes
SRv6+ uses 2 bytes
In any case its ASIC which is going to hold forwarding table to forward SRv6 or SRV6+ packets, therefore if its a 2 bytes or 40 byte header shouldn't matter when it comes to performance of forwarding ....
hence, in this case does it really matters if we use SRv6 or SRV6+....., if my ASIC is large enough to accommodate more number of IPV6 entries then SRV6 should work smoothly ....
The question is how much bandwidth overhead the protocol uses, & how complex the software or silicon must be in order to handle the protocol.
IMHO SRv6 reintroduces a lot of the problems from the late '90s that required new protocols & technologies to solve.
Ravi- The answer is bandwidth consumption. Even if your ASIC is powerful enough to drive your line cards to capacity with either SRv6 or SRm6, do you really want to dedicate a significant portion of your bandwidth to routing header overhead?
@@4unkb0y So SRV6 isnt really helpful?