Segment Routing: SR-MPLS, SRv6 and SRm6

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 9. 07. 2024
  • This video provides an overview of Segment Routing’s 3 forwarding planes: SR-MPLS, SRv6 and SRm6. For more information about segment routing, visit www.juniper.net/sr
    More videos on Segment Routing:
    Segment Routing Fundamentals: • Segment Routing Fundam...
    Segment Routing Benefits: • Segment Routing Benefits
    Segment Routing Controller Overview: • Segment Routing Contro...
    Blogs related to Segment Routing:
    SR-What you need to know: juni.pr/2SZCPcq
    Segment Routing: Policies, Paths and Segments: juni.pr/37Cr8fy
    Segment Routing (SR) With Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS): juni.pr/2N2Nv6h
    Segment Routing (SR) and Traffic Engineering (TE): Part One: juni.pr/2T0QtvM
    Segment Routing (SR) And Traffic Engineering (TE): Part Two: juni.pr/2ZV6ZyV
    Webinars:
    Delivering on the promise of Segment Routing: juni.pr/2N25ny3
    SR's use cases with this webinar on Delivering SR with SRover6, SRv6 and SRm6: juni.pr/39MZxdu
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 9

  • @ReslanArcan
    @ReslanArcan Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks Ron Bonica you are very helpful

  • @aaron-az
    @aaron-az Před 4 lety

    Really well done! Thanks!

  • @FXMV2012
    @FXMV2012 Před 2 lety

    Thanks Ron, that is helpful!

  • @wairisson
    @wairisson Před 2 lety

    Nice Video!

  • @ravipatil5734
    @ravipatil5734 Před 4 lety

    Bravo...

  • @ravipatil5734
    @ravipatil5734 Před 4 lety +3

    Hi
    Ron,
    SRv6 uses ipv6 which is 40 Bytes
    SRv6+ uses 2 bytes
    In any case its ASIC which is going to hold forwarding table to forward SRv6 or SRV6+ packets, therefore if its a 2 bytes or 40 byte header shouldn't matter when it comes to performance of forwarding ....
    hence, in this case does it really matters if we use SRv6 or SRV6+....., if my ASIC is large enough to accommodate more number of IPV6 entries then SRV6 should work smoothly ....

    • @4unkb0y
      @4unkb0y Před 4 lety +1

      The question is how much bandwidth overhead the protocol uses, & how complex the software or silicon must be in order to handle the protocol.
      IMHO SRv6 reintroduces a lot of the problems from the late '90s that required new protocols & technologies to solve.

    • @agupta27
      @agupta27 Před 4 lety

      Ravi- The answer is bandwidth consumption. Even if your ASIC is powerful enough to drive your line cards to capacity with either SRv6 or SRm6, do you really want to dedicate a significant portion of your bandwidth to routing header overhead?

    • @venchingfu
      @venchingfu Před 2 lety

      @@4unkb0y So SRV6 isnt really helpful?