- Unified executive - Hamilton - prez has to be accountable No pushing the blame on anyone - we need a powerful execute to fight Tyranny of the majority (veto) - energy- active president-all eyes go to him one leader to set the direction -duration - long enough to not back peddle -Support -strong executive that is getting paid and not bribed - competent power and let them do their job Sorry these are just my study notes that I took while watching, hope they help ppl if anyone wants a recap of the video
Good sir, Mr. Hip Hughes I am currently studying for my AP gov test and your videos have carried me through 2 ap classes now. I watched you videos so incredibly often during my AP US history class last year and you have no been my teacher while I cram for gov. Thank you for being the goat.
The whole introduction restored my will to live lmao. This was maybe the most cringe, yet most incredible things I’ve seen in so long. Thanks for the help.
I've somehow developed a talent of being both cringe worthy and engaging at the same time. I'm not sure if that's a compliment or not but I hope that you took something away from the video.
I love your videos, but they will be a lot better if you turn down the volume of those electric transitional noises.. they kept making me turn off my devices.
I'm sorry this is extremely unrelated by why does this dude look like low budget Jeremy Renner lmao. Thanks for the video btw Hip, helping me out in AP GOV!
I find so much irony in Hamilton's idea that somehow it's the tyranny of the people over the tyranny of the leading minority that we need to be concerned about as a republic. I would be more open to that point of view (and to some degree I am), if he approached tyranny of ruling bodies with similar concern.
Oh boy I hope a week isn't to late for a response. I think, based on what I've heard in class and through this video, Hamilton wrote this paper to explain why a singular executive is a good executive because it addressed some of the concerns the public had when ratifying (voting on) the constitution. Like, people were worried that a singular executive would be tyrannical/evil like with a king, and Hamilton wrote the essay explaining why having a singular executive instead was good so that hopefully the concern of the executive was addressed and people would vote to adopt the constitution.
Council of Rome? What did that have to do with governance? That was a synod of the Catholic Church that met in 382 to determine the canon of Scripture. It had nothing to do with civic administration.
I doesn’t sound like Hamilton would have supported the 22nd amendment putting even more limits on presidential terms. I don’t really see its purpose myself.
- Unified executive - Hamilton
- prez has to be accountable No pushing the blame on anyone
- we need a powerful execute to fight Tyranny of the majority (veto)
- energy- active president-all eyes go to him one leader to set the direction
-duration - long enough to not back peddle
-Support -strong executive that is getting paid and not bribed
- competent power and let them do their job
Sorry these are just my study notes that I took while watching, hope they help ppl if anyone wants a recap of the video
I love you
Ily
the hero we didn't ask for, but the hero we needed...
Great notes, thank you
this is 10x better than blowing your head off trying to read the actual papers
Good sir, Mr. Hip Hughes I am currently studying for my AP gov test and your videos have carried me through 2 ap classes now. I watched you videos so incredibly often during my AP US history class last year and you have no been my teacher while I cram for gov. Thank you for being the goat.
made sure to watch the entire ad all the way through because you helped me with my essay lmao
i wish i had found ur videos when i took apush and ap comp gov, but now ur rlly helping with my ap us gov work
This guy is like the mom that tries to be cool in front of all your friends. Luv the vids tho
The whole introduction restored my will to live lmao. This was maybe the most cringe, yet most incredible things I’ve seen in so long. Thanks for the help.
I've somehow developed a talent of being both cringe worthy and engaging at the same time. I'm not sure if that's a compliment or not but I hope that you took something away from the video.
@@hiphughes the button didn't do anything it just full screened my video repeatedly
I love your videos, but they will be a lot better if you turn down the volume of those electric transitional noises.. they kept making me turn off my devices.
Thank you!
Wait what's the music? It's actually pretty good
Does the president's Cabinet go against this?
you a literally the G
I'm sorry this is extremely unrelated by why does this dude look like low budget Jeremy Renner lmao. Thanks for the video btw Hip, helping me out in AP GOV!
that's literally what I was thinking :)
Well..so much for the ability to keep the bribery out of the picture...Citizens United sealed that deal.
absolutely
@@clemenshenning5525 It was a super pac, so soft money was used for that
I find so much irony in Hamilton's idea that somehow it's the tyranny of the people over the tyranny of the leading minority that we need to be concerned about as a republic. I would be more open to that point of view (and to some degree I am), if he approached tyranny of ruling bodies with similar concern.
Can some one tell me what is federalist papers number 70 is in a simple way please? Sorry im just really stupid
Oh boy I hope a week isn't to late for a response. I think, based on what I've heard in class and through this video, Hamilton wrote this paper to explain why a singular executive is a good executive because it addressed some of the concerns the public had when ratifying (voting on) the constitution. Like, people were worried that a singular executive would be tyrannical/evil like with a king, and Hamilton wrote the essay explaining why having a singular executive instead was good so that hopefully the concern of the executive was addressed and people would vote to adopt the constitution.
@@karib.3075 Thank you sm!
have you don't a piece on the 1871 act...
take ap lang first
@@apat3458 damn
Sopwith Camel Oh yeah yeah
My boy
Where's those tl;dr's at
its only a 4 minute video
Bro I saw you in endgame
Council of Rome? What did that have to do with governance? That was a synod of the Catholic Church that met in 382 to determine the canon of Scripture. It had nothing to do with civic administration.
Why does he remind me of the Joker
I doesn’t sound like Hamilton would have supported the 22nd amendment putting even more limits on presidential terms. I don’t really see its purpose myself.