Hi, the GB-6 is not a penetrator weapon, looks like you use the HE (High Explosive) version and is not meant for hardened targets. I am reviewing the other aspects of your video as well and will report the issues I see to the team. Thanks!
The M282 MPP APKWS is a penetrator weapon and does do damage to armored vehicles but in reality ground vehicles are fairly basic DMs right now. You will not see system, mobility or crew kills currently all things you might see with the usage of this weapon. As a ground vehicle is more damaged in DCS you will see a point where it smokes, it can lose the ability to return fire or even limited mobility, but this is something we do want to improve.
The Belouga I dont think would ber very affective vs more modern armor. Its not guided and would be better vs light armor, some of the issues above with the rockets also apply here. In other jets, I was told by an SME, with clusters they tend to like to drop 2 as well when using clusters, as well clusters are like shot guns, not great for shooting at a distance at one target.
Ship damage is being worked on, both visually and what kind of damage you will see. Its possible for a large ship to take a hit from one weapon and survive, but modelling of system damage and other things is important.
@@drush525 yeah it was a joke about how ED focuses on making really high quality cockpits but not on other aspects of the game like ai or a damage model
DCS is sometimes funky when it comes to damage. Seems like most of APCs die with a single APKWS hit. BMP-1 takes 1 to 2 hits from the side to die. Meanwhile helicopters like Mi-24 and Mi-8 may take 3 to 4 and continue flying...
Life gets a lot easier when you just accept DCS as a game and stop worrying about it as a simulator for aircraft we will never fly anyways. Unfortunate, but its where the true happiness lies.
@@canconservative8976 I am aware but a couple of things on that. From what I remember, It's the Air national guard, it's only the A10 and they don't use the version of DCS we do. Also pretty sure they don't use it for much other than procedural training so the specific performance of weapons and the airframe don't particularly matter
@@Hustler9g True... maybe that's why it's called DCS "WORLD"...and in that world I don't think anybody expects real life, in fact it's better than RL because you can't die! That said I get your point about people complaining because of unrealistic expectations..
@@theeltea Вы имеете ввиду сетевую игру? Ну а в чём проблема? Если у вас закрытое сообщество (самые интересные сервера как правило под паролем), то можно всем откатиться на определённую стабильную версию и играть в неё. Можно даже иметь на компьютере сразу две версии, как я собственно и сделал.
@@CalculateDevice Сколько лет задалбывали парадигмой OB/Release и наконец-то от этой шизофрении ушли - так оказывается есть упоротые, которые ещё это поддерживают. Не надо никуда откатываться. На старых версиях такая же уйма багов так что хрен редьки не слаще. А иметь на компьютере две версии это ещё больший сатанизм, учитывая что все ТВД и модули весят уже под терабайт. И таки да, люди на пабликах в основном летают. Никаких "интересных серверов" под паролями нет. Есть просто миссии которые летают приватно.
Such an insanely detailed Sim, yet some aspects look like a 3 year old with a broken Crayon animated. Com'on you guys can at least try to model in some realistic explosions, smoke and fire.
Hi, the GB-6 is not a penetrator weapon, looks like you use the HE (High Explosive) version and is not meant for hardened targets. I am reviewing the other aspects of your video as well and will report the issues I see to the team. Thanks!
The M282 MPP APKWS is a penetrator weapon and does do damage to armored vehicles but in reality ground vehicles are fairly basic DMs right now. You will not see system, mobility or crew kills currently all things you might see with the usage of this weapon. As a ground vehicle is more damaged in DCS you will see a point where it smokes, it can lose the ability to return fire or even limited mobility, but this is something we do want to improve.
The Belouga I dont think would ber very affective vs more modern armor. Its not guided and would be better vs light armor, some of the issues above with the rockets also apply here. In other jets, I was told by an SME, with clusters they tend to like to drop 2 as well when using clusters, as well clusters are like shot guns, not great for shooting at a distance at one target.
I have reported an issue with the damage I am seeing with the Belouga. Even in a large group of vehicles it doesn't seem to hit much.
real one right here
Ship damage is being worked on, both visually and what kind of damage you will see. Its possible for a large ship to take a hit from one weapon and survive, but modelling of system damage and other things is important.
"IRL it died in two hits" Oooof lol.
Too far?😅
@@harryballer4239 No you need to go further.
real life damage model is a mess
Digital Cockpit Simulator
"COMBAT" NOT "COCKPIT ".
@@drush525 yeah it was a joke about how ED focuses on making really high quality cockpits but not on other aspects of the game like ai or a damage model
DCS is sometimes funky when it comes to damage. Seems like most of APCs die with a single APKWS hit. BMP-1 takes 1 to 2 hits from the side to die. Meanwhile helicopters like Mi-24 and Mi-8 may take 3 to 4 and continue flying...
Apart from the fuel depot seems nice and realistic then 👍
I would say this is generally a fair assessment.
One of the best DCS videos I've seen...in a long time.. maybe Ever! Yes, pls fix ED. Thanks
They have responded to the ticket with this video attached to it. Was sent to their dev team.
@@harryballer4239 very nice. Thanks for doing this for us! I'm sure your work will help move things along.
Basically everything in the video has been reported and accepted in the ED forum for years, but unfortunately without any changes.
It's okay, they are working on it, we'll get a better damage model sometime in the next 2 weeks
In the next 2years more likely
2 years, lol
Make it 2 decades, and I am not even joking.
The damage model we have now is from LOMAC, early 2000s
Its 2 week now 😂
So much this. If you miss by 1 ft, well its still alive, no splash damage, no fragment damage, no overpressure, nothing.
Fragmentation is in progress right now, thanks.
@@NineLineEDIs this bignewy talking
This is what you paid for, don't complain.
~Batman, probably
BMS is outdated, VTOL VR is an arcade game. You can't compare them to the extent of DCS.
Yeah also the complete lack of splash damage or frag damage really upsets me
If you want realism in those aspects, go play Command Modern Operations.
Life gets a lot easier when you just accept DCS as a game and stop worrying about it as a simulator for aircraft we will never fly anyways. Unfortunate, but its where the true happiness lies.
But the reason that we play this game is to actually experience what we can't.
Hence why the word "simulator" exists in "DCS"
@@Garuda1_AC6 yeah I get it trust me but you will only be disappointed if you can't accept its massively flawed
I guess you weren't aware that REAL LIFE Air Force Pilots fly DCS and praise many aspects of it... not everything is perfect, yet.
@@canconservative8976 I am aware but a couple of things on that. From what I remember, It's the Air national guard, it's only the A10 and they don't use the version of DCS we do. Also pretty sure they don't use it for much other than procedural training so the specific performance of weapons and the airframe don't particularly matter
@@Hustler9g True... maybe that's why it's called DCS "WORLD"...and in that world I don't think anybody expects real life, in fact it's better than RL because you can't die!
That said I get your point about people complaining because of unrealistic expectations..
I literally don't have this problem at all
И даже поле таких ошибок, пришедших с новым обновлением, многие почему-то не спешат откатиться на предыдущую версию.
потому что они играют в МП
@@theeltea Вы имеете ввиду сетевую игру? Ну а в чём проблема? Если у вас закрытое сообщество (самые интересные сервера как правило под паролем), то можно всем откатиться на определённую стабильную версию и играть в неё. Можно даже иметь на компьютере сразу две версии, как я собственно и сделал.
@@CalculateDevice Сколько лет задалбывали парадигмой OB/Release и наконец-то от этой шизофрении ушли - так оказывается есть упоротые, которые ещё это поддерживают.
Не надо никуда откатываться. На старых версиях такая же уйма багов так что хрен редьки не слаще. А иметь на компьютере две версии это ещё больший сатанизм, учитывая что все ТВД и модули весят уже под терабайт.
И таки да, люди на пабликах в основном летают. Никаких "интересных серверов" под паролями нет. Есть просто миссии которые летают приватно.
Yes its to bad and shameless, why dont do it like arma 3 and squad.
Eagle Dynamics need to stop focusing on third party modules and actually focus on the actual game itself! This is beyond a joke
russian bias am i right
Man this video is right up there with that one about being able to take off from the super carrier! Nice work
Looks pretty normal to me..
You need a padded walled room 😂
Such an insanely detailed Sim, yet some aspects look like a 3 year old with a broken Crayon animated. Com'on you guys can at least try to model in some realistic explosions, smoke and fire.