Canon R8 and R50 Explained | Where do They Fit?
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 02. 2023
- Support the Channel: geni.us/CFAStarter
Real Estate Course: geni.us/6TwXpx
Canon R8: bhpho.to/3lnamxm
Canon R50: bhpho.to/3HOzQLp
Canon 14-35m Lens: bhpho.to/3x5Zu9N
Gimbal: bhpho.to/3kGqrOh
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ►► goo.gl/SgrdTA
Music From ►► share.mscbd.fm/bwashmedia
My Commercial Video Website ►► bwashmedia.com
Business Contact ►► contact@bwashmedia.com
What's In my Camera Bag
Bag: amzn.to/2DtX3Eg
Camera 1: amzn.to/2AT1WnA
Camera 2: amzn.to/2PLx94j
Drone: amzn.to/2Da4qj9
50mm 1.2: amzn.to/2t1JsM6
Canon 70-200: amzn.to/2s2L5YR
Canon 100mm: amzn.to/2tlKmpp
Canon 10-18mm: amzn.to/2tlO7uN
Rode Mic Pro: amzn.to/2tpWlm9
Rond Wireless Mic: amzn.to/2tlXtqI
My Gear
My Drone: amzn.to/2qqLseG
My Camera: amzn.to/2s22AZA
My Lighting: amzn.to/2rJEzt6
My Microphone: amzn.to/2qqLweB
I like the car analogy. Helps me think through which one to buy for that extra camera. Thanks!
I'm in analysis paralysis over which mirrorless camera to buy for travel! Thank you for the timely video and I look forward to the full comparison video.
Great video and comparison !
R8 is a beast
Yessir 💯
The R8 may not break the bank but RF lenses will. Definitely thinking of getting the R8 as an upgrade from my 80D
I have had zero problems using my Canon and Sigma EF glass on the R6ii with the Canon adapter after upgrading from an 80D
@@larrycoonrod5563 good to know. Thanks for the info!
Get a sony
There is cheap rf lenses....
@@AkachiGP haha, naw. I’m good but they are great cameras.
Great video thanks... Are you still working on the whole R range comparison? Would love to see some low light shot comparison!
Badass video of telling about it and how to use in in real life practice
The R8 sensor is too good to pass up at that price point. I can get around a smaller battery with a battery pack, use multiple sd cards during longer shoots, use lenses with IS. Problems solved
This is a great analogy. Also if you can’t afford the gear right now. Then rent. Renting is cheap rent for a few days and make double. Take some money out for your next rental and keep it going until you can buy your own gear.
Canon rolled out RF lenses pretty slowly. They need to open the mount or ramp up RND and production of new lenses
This. Their development cycle on bodies looks well set now and imagine the R5ii out soon and R1 following after that. But lenses, my oh my. So slow! RF-S zooms no where to be seen along with middle tier RF (they used to have gold decals on EF)
Hummmm., I’m thinking the R7, R8, R19 and R50 are the new Rebel series?? So are these for beginners?? Would you recommend professional users to swap out??
Can someone help me decide between the Sony ZVe10 vs the R50 for outdoors/fishing content? Any input is appreciated!
Do you currently own the sony fx3?
Waiting for Sony to hit back and looks are subjective and fx30 has more flexible creative options than ghs52 I reckon, because it still has more lens selections, but true low light isn't so good and I agree rf lenses too pricy
Cheers so much I appreciate your time
Great video! The release of the R8 actually made my decision to get the R6 Mark 2 easy since I already have the original R and was focused on picking up RF lenses instead of upgrading bodies.
So is there a really big difference between r50 and the r8 because the r50 does have 6k sample to 4k
Does the r8 have a record limit in full HD?
If Canon opens up the RF mount for third party lens makers and mount adapter makers, I'm getting an R8 but if not then I'll just go Blackmagic for video and Fuji for photography. I sold all my shares of Canon when they sent the letter out to the lens manufacturers. I've been using Canon since 2005 but that move was a losing one.
For me it's the R7. Having full frame just isn't as big of a deal as it use to be anymore. The only stat the R8 has over the R7 is the full frame. For me I never shoot over 2k ISO, and I know how to work the lenses on a "crop". Depending on your needs the choice shall vary 👍🏽
Foco melhor não vale nada pra vc ? R7 👎
Please include the original R!! I want a cheaper full frame than the r6 but I don’t want the smaller battery or smaller build like the rp or r8.
Agreed
Why? Good question. These are fine "fill in the gaps" cameras that you release AFTER you have a full line of both affordable and professional lenses. Unless Canon has just decided that most people are just going to use old EF lenses anyway.
I currently have the R7 and am going back and forth about switching to the R8. I can’t decide ugh
Se mudou não arrependeu !!!
I would be upgrading from the 80D to R8 for photography would it be worth it? Or just get the R6 mark ii
You would be getting nice upgrade going to the r8 as now you will have full frame. the R6ii would give you a few more bells and whistles. but if $2500 is your max budget I would go with the R8 and invest in a good lens.
@@bwashmedia, lembrando que a R6M2 também têm imagem 20% melhor que a R8.
They've lowered the price of r7 in the uk at least from what ive seen. Its still strange
Canon R8 is a beast
cool
R3 works best for me.
No ibis is weird to me. I understand it’s full frame and they need to leave room for higher end models but I can’t believe they left ibis out.
also not including the Top LCD panel in R6 and R6mk2 is kinda unacceptable.
@@tonygreenmike top LCD is useless IMHO... Unless you always shoot below waist, not looking back LCD or EVF
@@zegzbrutal to each his own...yet viewing on LCD is like browsing through more stuff.... and more to navigate and select the stuff we need..I would want to use the back screen only when I want something beyond the things that appear on a top lcd panel....of course it is elaborate than a top lcd panel...accessing the top lcd panel is much quicker than going to the back screen..thats my personal experience though,,....and the difference between battery consumption while chimping on a back lcd screen and for the things that appear on the top panel...had the manufacturers considered it to be useless they wouldn't have retained it in R5, and R3. I don't think they did not remove the top panel because 'it was considered useless' but to make way for a new switch ...Nikon had a better way with the on/off switch (around the shutter release) many years ago...cheers.
@@tonygreenmike With the newer model EOS D and the EOS R the stuff that was in the top panel is now in the viewfinder. No more need for the top panel
Many Canon lenses have a build in and very capabel IS (all the RF lenses have 5 levels of stabilisation). So not that much need for an IBIS on the lower end bodies since the non stabilised lenses are typically in the > 1500€ price range and not what the average R8 customer buys
Where does the R5C sit?
It's a cinema camera. You can get some good stills though since it's 45mp
Great video but there is something that I quite don't understand and I apologize for what I'm about to say next. I do really have the impression that must youtubers are trying to justify what it is not a good enough product. I'm talking about the R8. Is this supposed to be a mid tier camera in the R segment? No IBIS, no shutter protection to the sensor when changing lenses, smaller battery size, so less autonomy to go out and shoot, oh yes you buy more batteries and that' s it, really? They put 6FPS en electronic first curtain in the R8 and 12 in the R50, really? Oh ok you have the 40 FPS in electronic, yes but a tiny buffer, not to mention what happens when you try to shoot indoors with flickering lights. I can understand the fact of only one card, I can understand a "lower" electronic view finder like in the R7 (witch is totally fine for me), I can understand the lack of proper weather sealing even the buffer size I can understand. Do you really believe that putting IBIS, more FPS (e.g. 10), bigger battery will make the camera much more expensive? the R7 has it. Oh yes is an APSC rather than a FF. Come on we are all smarter than that! So to make the long story short! If someone jumps to point me out that I got it wrong, that the R8 is more a replacement of the RP rather than a replacement of the R, then, hands down, I will 100% agree that the R8 is a fantastic product.
@G A I fully agree with you , but if we take into account the naming convention of the R* system I think there is not going to be a truly replacement of the R. Let us hope that I'm wrong, but I still no see a truly mid tier FF body in the R system yet. In my humble opinion Canon tried to replace both (RP and R) with the R8. Again, let us hope that I'm wrong.
@G A The problem I see here is that Canon's autofocus has become so good that trying to silde a new body in between the R6/mkII and the R8 (in this case) without shooting themselves in the foot will certainly become a real challenge for them 🤔. In my opinion, they should have ramped this camera a little more (lp6n* battery, ibis, maybe a less capable one up to 4 stops of compensation; but better than nothing, same buffer; but 10FPS in mechanical mode, maybe up to 30 FPS ES, curtain protection to the sensor when changing lenses same video specs and a price range in between 1799 and 2000) would have made more sense.
Concordo, só não concordo na citação da R7 que é uma 👎 !
r8 👍👍👍👍👍👍
I’d go with the R7 over the R8
R7 isn’t full frame
Indeed, especially since if I wanted, I can't add an adapter to get very close to full frame. I don't plan to use it as a professional nor use it for wildlife, etc.
@@stevenlua8076 metabones nspeedbooster works really well.
I’ve had this dilemma I think other than being apsc the r7 offers more
@@angelguzman8737 indeed it offers but full vs crop is big consideration.
I think I'd prefer the base Lexus
R7 vs R8 highlights the problems with RF. Great camera with no lenses or super basic camera with a lot of expensive lenses. Glad I left Canon for Sony
Best comment!
Take of the magic mice blinders and look again at the lenses Canon has in the RF line. And add almost ALL EF and 3rd party EF lenses that (unlike stuff adapted to the magic mice cam) works at least as good as on the original mount
my man talks about 3500 bucks like they're 20 cents💀
Only because I know you can get the money back by putting the camera to work. Lol
Let’s go Brandon 🎉
Bahahah 😂😅
Why cameras looking ugly in your thumbnail
They don't fit anywhere cuz there ain't any good, desirable lenses for them. 😉
R7 has more megapixels!
Longer battery life,
Crop factor for wildlife!
More Megapixel on the tiny sensor means a lousy high ISO capability and a very high demands on the lenses. Same as the 90D where the sensor came from - quite a few that upgraded from the 80D downgraded again.
And the tiny sensor has other problems compared to a full frame as well (bigger DoF etc). Animals peepers are a minority, Canon should have kept the pint sized sensors and the jammering majority to EOS M or DSLR
Só não têm o principal, qualidade de imagem (fotos).
They fit where Canon lure unsuspecting consumers in at Bestbuy, who thought they bought a cheap brand name camera, but then are hampered by taking shitty pictures on the SHITTY canon kit lens, and stuck because there are no other cheap lens options, so 18-45 piece of crap, 16mm piece of crap becomes their only daily lenses.