A problem with the idea of "intelligence" is that we tend to assume its necessarily positive quality. The more "intelligence" you have, the better. That's not necessarily the case. A better guide is to think of "fluid" intelligence as processing speed and "crystallised" intelligence as sedimented experience. The overall impact of these "two" intelligences is always their sum, and to suggest otherwise is an error. For example, in your example, Arthur was not reckoning ex nihilo when he stood on the pressure pad, he was using his experience poetically or metaphorically, i.e. by processing analogues and similarities, to come up with a novel solution. He may not have stood on a pressure pad previously, but he had garnered and stored experience that was tangentially relevant. However, faster processing speed is of little, no or even negative value if the sedimented knowledge you are working with is faulty, skewed, outmoded, or otherwise not fit for purpose. That is why some very "smart" people do very stupid things. Generally speaking, we are living in a culture in which our "fluid" intelligence (i.e. our processing speed) is massively accelerated by digital/computing technologies, but where our shared "crystallised" intelligence (i.e. our stock of received wisdom and accepted ideas) is inept and deathly. We're super-intelligent and super-self-destructive. There's no paradox, it's just that "intelligence", in and of itself, is of no benefit. To be advantageous, it must be allied to wisdom.
I'm sure you don't know everything but I want to hear more things you want to say. Maybe you can hear me too. How do we arrange that? If you're interested.
@@tharseo_jconnections could be made on CZcams, unfortunately most just want to massage their ego with a comment than to connect with another mind on the same subject.
It sounds like just the difference between using knowledge versus using logic. Which is pretty fuzzy. Logic depends on knowledge, and applying knowledge requires logic. They’re two sides of one coin.
This video starts with "There are arguably two types of intelligence." This is a statement intended to shut down any thought or questioning about how many types of intelligence there are. That there are two types of intelligence has not been proven. There could be more than two types of intelligence, or a range of intelligence based on more than two factors.
Hi GrapeShot, thanks for your comment. I totally understand your wish. We decided to stick to the original theories only, because we want our content to be timeless. The way they these theories are being perceived and criticised changes over the years, while the theories themselves do not change. :)
Some human beings have such fluid intelligence that they succeed at finding the answer to how to remove suffering permanently. Isn't that the ultimate purpose of living?
@@ramspace Thats a tough question that many people in human history tried and failed to find the answer. In my opinion and personal experience it would require both. At the end of the day it requires a lot of introspection and understanding on what you ultimately value and want in your life. Hope this was helpful and best of luck!
@@daveman985 Hi, some say that by removing desire/anger/greed/attachment/and finally ego(body identification) one becomes free from suffering permanently. Aatma vichar/gyaan are two tools available. Not easy at all. That is why some argue that grace is required. Maybe the intellect is not sufficient.
Intelligence is often a predicator of general career success..but also comes with the potential trappings of intellectual narcissism and/or life dissatisfaction with perceived under utilisation of personal potential.
I had to take a 3-day test to give them an idea about my cognitive abilities. Based on the results my fluid intelligence is getting close to "gifted". Well, here i am, a 33 year old unemployed loner without a school degree. LOL
Everybody is running behind intelligence but I think that intelligence will only come when you study something when you research something when you read something regret guilt compassion all these things are experienced and this will give you intelligence in the present
I’m an Electrical Engineering Technician. I am responsible for manufacturing process and fix the design flaws in the designed device. I might be both. Intelligence to me is the ability to build what you think.
I would propose fire intelligence. Where the protagonist sees the witch AND the family both trying to use him, he loses it ( hence the fire,) and utterly destroyed both because he doesn't want to put up with that crap. No quest and the dude goes on to live a MUCH better life minus the BS with his best friend... A dog.
Somehow intelligence is a term which we can get from the experience that we did in the past some get their intelligence in their hereditary but some get intelligence on their past experience the date most of the time we get our intelligence but we do in the present entrepreneurship become the past tomorrow so the thing is that you can only can intelligence by doing the work today nothing more than that some tell that there is a miracle to everyone but no there is no miracle happening to everyone there is only one thing that is happening to everyone is the circumstances and situation is forcing them to do something which they want and in return they will give you something which you need in future
What are you yapping about From what I am seeing you're telling people to do work today and things like that The thing is you make a point but nobody is giving any value to your words It's people themselves who choose to do the work today or tommorow
If I was to build this pressure trap, I would make it sensitive only above average human adult weight - few pounds just to be on the safe side. So, Arthur is dead...
Um... This is wrong, but kinda right in a different way. Intelligence is the application of knowledge. Crystalized, in this context, really just means how wide a persons knowledge base is, ie, how many ideas have they been exposed to in their life. This also means the plot is wrong, as it would look more like an S curve, mostly flat until the pre-teen years as we don't have enough to be "fully conscious" until then. The fluid aspect is really a vertical aspect, or what we might also call the narrow understanding. Street smarts, by another name. The knowledge and understanding might not be known, but the situational instinct is there. The graph for this is close, as it climes early in life and may peak by late 20's for most people. *would expect the drop in ability to more extreme; can't teach an old dog new tricks, etc.
Support us to make more videos about social science at www.patreon.com/sprouts!
Noice
Yeah that's cool and all but I was looking for the freezedown OST #2 from IITPP
A problem with the idea of "intelligence" is that we tend to assume its necessarily positive quality. The more "intelligence" you have, the better. That's not necessarily the case. A better guide is to think of "fluid" intelligence as processing speed and "crystallised" intelligence as sedimented experience. The overall impact of these "two" intelligences is always their sum, and to suggest otherwise is an error. For example, in your example, Arthur was not reckoning ex nihilo when he stood on the pressure pad, he was using his experience poetically or metaphorically, i.e. by processing analogues and similarities, to come up with a novel solution. He may not have stood on a pressure pad previously, but he had garnered and stored experience that was tangentially relevant. However, faster processing speed is of little, no or even negative value if the sedimented knowledge you are working with is faulty, skewed, outmoded, or otherwise not fit for purpose. That is why some very "smart" people do very stupid things. Generally speaking, we are living in a culture in which our "fluid" intelligence (i.e. our processing speed) is massively accelerated by digital/computing technologies, but where our shared "crystallised" intelligence (i.e. our stock of received wisdom and accepted ideas) is inept and deathly. We're super-intelligent and super-self-destructive. There's no paradox, it's just that "intelligence", in and of itself, is of no benefit. To be advantageous, it must be allied to wisdom.
I'm sure you don't know everything but I want to hear more things you want to say. Maybe you can hear me too. How do we arrange that? If you're interested.
👍👍
Very well done on explaining these points
i always appreciate a good “id est” in a sentence.
@@tharseo_jconnections could be made on CZcams, unfortunately most just want to massage their ego with a comment than to connect with another mind on the same subject.
It sounds like just the difference between using knowledge versus using logic. Which is pretty fuzzy. Logic depends on knowledge, and applying knowledge requires logic. They’re two sides of one coin.
Love your videos, concise, clear and pleasant to watch :)
Thank you!
This video starts with "There are arguably two types of intelligence." This is a statement intended to shut down any thought or questioning about how many types of intelligence there are. That there are two types of intelligence has not been proven. There could be more than two types of intelligence, or a range of intelligence based on more than two factors.
Thanks and good point William. We will try to be more clear next time.
Love the story at the end, well explained, thanks :)
I still want some 'modern' criticisms to these theories which were brought in 1960s and 70s, to be explained briefly in the videos.
Hi GrapeShot, thanks for your comment. I totally understand your wish. We decided to stick to the original theories only, because we want our content to be timeless. The way they these theories are being perceived and criticised changes over the years, while the theories themselves do not change. :)
@@sprouts No, the theories themselves (like flat earth) can be proven as no longer theory rather as false assumptions.
Some human beings have such fluid intelligence that they succeed at finding the answer to how to remove suffering permanently. Isn't that the ultimate purpose of living?
No, it sounds smart but your way off
@@mikal1659 Hi Mikail, I'm curious. What type of intelligence is required to remove suffering permanently? I shall integrate it.
Smart enough for suicide..
@@ramspace Thats a tough question that many people in human history tried and failed to find the answer. In my opinion and personal experience it would require both. At the end of the day it requires a lot of introspection and understanding on what you ultimately value and want in your life. Hope this was helpful and best of luck!
@@daveman985 Hi, some say that by removing desire/anger/greed/attachment/and finally ego(body identification) one becomes free from suffering permanently. Aatma vichar/gyaan are two tools available. Not easy at all. That is why some argue that grace is required. Maybe the intellect is not sufficient.
Intelligence is often a predicator of general career success..but also comes with the potential trappings of intellectual narcissism and/or life dissatisfaction with perceived under utilisation of personal potential.
Awesome explanation. Keep the good work :)
I see resemblance to Carl Jung's study, the cognitive functions, it's like Si (crystallized) and Ni (Fluid).
Says there are two types of intelligence"
The research about the seven types of intelligence: are you sure about that?
Her: can you think of a time you ysed your fluid and crystallized intelligence?
Me: I'm using it right now
I had to take a 3-day test to give them an idea about my cognitive abilities. Based on the results my fluid intelligence is getting close to "gifted". Well, here i am, a 33 year old unemployed loner without a school degree. LOL
your surroundings probably shaped your fluid intelligence
Brilliant explanation 🌻
I JUST TURNED 70 I AGREE IM ALWAYS LEARNING
loved the short video
It's a good thing Indiana Jones had a solid fluid intelligence in Raiders of the Lost Ark, or it would've been a REALLY short film!😉
Everybody is running behind intelligence but I think that intelligence will only come when you study something when you research something when you read something regret guilt compassion all these things are experienced and this will give you intelligence in the present
You're telling that as if nobody knows such a simple thing as intelligence comes from studying
You are so greate
Plz make many economics videos
i really hope i can support you guys by making indonesia subtitle, because i wanted to teach but am stupid.
I’m an Electrical Engineering Technician.
I am responsible for manufacturing process and fix the design flaws in the designed device. I might be both.
Intelligence to me is the ability to build what you think.
I knew that. I feel more intelligent using my jeans.
Excellent
Thank you so much 😀
Great work Thank youu
Welcome 🙏
Great video 😃
From Nepal 🎉
what's the difference between wisdom and crystallized intelligence?
No difference
A subtle mix of fluid and crystallized intelligence
A wise person may have known the risks of entering the tomb and made sure he came prepared?
@@AltijdHard_403a wise person has great decision making and anticipation
I would propose fire intelligence. Where the protagonist sees the witch AND the family both trying to use him, he loses it ( hence the fire,) and utterly destroyed both because he doesn't want to put up with that crap. No quest and the dude goes on to live a MUCH better life minus the BS with his best friend... A dog.
Also, fire gets rid of witches and Medieval family homes most efficaciously.
Arthur is what we derisively call 'a simp.' Kids, don't be like Arthur.
Kobe and Shaq
Woah cool
Somehow intelligence is a term which we can get from the experience that we did in the past some get their intelligence in their hereditary but some get intelligence on their past experience the date most of the time we get our intelligence but we do in the present entrepreneurship become the past tomorrow so the thing is that you can only can intelligence by doing the work today nothing more than that some tell that there is a miracle to everyone but no there is no miracle happening to everyone there is only one thing that is happening to everyone is the circumstances and situation is forcing them to do something which they want and in return they will give you something which you need in future
What are you yapping about
From what I am seeing you're telling people to do work today and things like that
The thing is you make a point but nobody is giving any value to your words
It's people themselves who choose to do the work today or tommorow
If I was to build this pressure trap, I would make it sensitive only above average human adult weight - few pounds just to be on the safe side. So, Arthur is dead...
Yeah... so Arthur doesn't have the intelligence to marry the princess?
Idk
No,he doesn't.bcoz he is BATMAN😶🌫😎
@@akashhiwarale3991 Yeah, but Batman is a multimillionaire. 😀
hello
Cool
Plasma
🌺🌻
Um... This is wrong, but kinda right in a different way. Intelligence is the application of knowledge. Crystalized, in this context, really just means how wide a persons knowledge base is, ie, how many ideas have they been exposed to in their life. This also means the plot is wrong, as it would look more like an S curve, mostly flat until the pre-teen years as we don't have enough to be "fully conscious" until then. The fluid aspect is really a vertical aspect, or what we might also call the narrow understanding. Street smarts, by another name. The knowledge and understanding might not be known, but the situational instinct is there. The graph for this is close, as it climes early in life and may peak by late 20's for most people. *would expect the drop in ability to more extreme; can't teach an old dog new tricks, etc.
Isn't this what Myer Briggers (MBTI) test talks about?
Only got through half of this. Please hire decent voice actors!!
Oh shut up, she's doing a very good job.
@@couchpotatoe91 it is fine voice acting also who cares if it's "shit" just read the transcript
@evrimagaci