Some Other Dude he's not my friend, I live 3000 miles away on the east coast. Although he's a mechanic and not a scholarly engineer, I see no evidence he's a drinker. And the world needs guys like him. Sometimes thats where the breakthroughs come from.
I'm the first one who asked several questions of you in this latest round of the internet trolling you. And you still haven't responded specifically to those questions.
as Ernie Brink said, by changing sparkplug hole geometry by a very thin flat hole (height of the hole will have the same thickness as apex seal) , but too narrow hole could diminish the effectiveness of the spark,I think we can go bigger in the height of the hole without really having consequant gas exchange between compression chamber and exhaust chamber. Other ideas from Ernie Brink are very interesting and pertinant and there are still more possibility to improve the rotary engine
One of the fundamental flaws in the Wankel design was the troublesome shape of its internal components... cylinders and spherical shapes are ideal for ensuring even and consistent thermal expansion and contraction and the clearances between the moving parts, stationary parts and most importantly the sealing parts... Like the Newcomen steam engine, one of the Wankel's major flaws is that it is required to maintain high temperatures and colder temperatures with in the same housing, high wear rates and low thermal efficiency is the end result.
Lol it has flawed engineering, that's why Mazda stopped making them. They're a neat design and have proven they can make power but reliable power? Not happening 🤣. The 787B like this one here needs a complete rebuild after every run almost like a nitro engine, except it's not sheer horsepower tearing this engine up its the overall wankel design. They're only sought after by Mazda enthusiasts not people trying to get the most bang for their buck.
@@JBeamGT3 if they could perfect making good apex seals then that’s it would be a far better easy to maintain engine that can produce crazy power with low displacement
@@JBeamGT3 what a stupid statement. Like if all the other engines on a 24h race don't need rebuilding. Mazda finished and won. Others didn't with reliability issues. Unfortunately Mazda Wankel engine was banned by the fucking FIA, otherwise they would probably do it again.
@@whisperdancer June 22nd is the 9 year anniversary of the final end of Wankel engine production. At 4:30pm Tokyo time on June 22, 2012 Mazda produced its very last Wankel engine. The Wankel engine assembly plant at Mazda's Ujina #2 plant shut down and was later demolished to make way for a new Skyactiv G engine factory.
Rotary motor explained...Wankel engines, more commonly known as rotary engines, differ from regular engines as they don’t have a reciprocating piston travelling up and down in a cylinder. Instead a triangular shaped rotor spins inside an hour-glass shaped housing. Valves in the casings allow gases to transfer, similar to a two-stroke, but unlike a reciprocating engine all the parts inside move in the same direction. This means the engine is smooth, compact and capable of delivering a high power-to-weight ratio
The way Ernie Brink described it, it makes sense that it would greatly minimize if not almost eliminate compression & mixture loss as well as reduce exhaust temps. Reduced exhaust temps would also translate to a cooler motor.
This is my Dad's Dyno, when I was a kid I used to vaporise Gummibears on the exaust manifolds when my Dad was testing. These are only Red hot, they would get White hot after a longer run...
It's only 6k rpm. At this rpm no piston engines bursts! And F1 engines -all are piston engines- revs up to 18k rpm! Don't comment without knowledge. Wankel engines are unefficient and weak. That's why they couldn't get widespread.
Published on Dec 24, 2012The Wankel engine always held out a lot of promise, but never was able to fully deliver on those promises. It was never very fuel efficient, and the exhaust temperatures were very high. But now an independent car tech thinks he has stumbled onto what held that engine back. rotary engine breakthrough rotary hemi breakthrough will come alive but you shall receive power efficiency and might when the holy spirit has come upon you and you shall be my witnesse,s thank you all love you Get more video everyday at autolineRead more Show less Reply 1
ernie brink ernie brink 3 days ago (edited) the real doc bimmer r look more names awesome 1 second ago Guess Who Guess Who 22 minutes ago It is still a HIGH MAINTENANCE - EVEN MORE SO NOW - STOICHIOMETRIC IC ENGINE HYDROCARBON EMITTING PIECE OF JUNK REGARDLESS! Ernie Brink Ernie Brink 10 minutes ago ARE YOU A FAULT FINDER HOPE NOT GOD BLESS YOU Ernie Brink Ernie Brink 4 minutes ago Guess Who Guess Who 16 hours ago Wankel will never completely replace piston engines! Ernie Brink Ernie Brink 23 minutes ago GUESS WHO AWESOME SPIRIT 0 DEGREES JUST LIKE THE MR BRINK? Some Other Dude Some Other Dude 3 days ago (edited) + doktor Dude at this point it's you who is looking ridiculous. You have repeated yourself literally hundreds of times. Let it go. Right or wrong, there will be people in the world who have opinions which differ from yours. It's part of the human condition. You're smart enough to know a lot of things, why can't you grasp this? Ernie's beliefs and conclusions are not in perfect agreement with yours. Give it a 'shrug' and stop trying to single-handedly 'correct' every person on the planet with respect to mazda/wankels/rotaries.
By this thing, I meant the whole engine. I understand those are exhaust pipes that are glowing hot. What I mean is, when you're doing a dyno tune, you have a giant fan keeping the engine cool. I was just asking what was keeping this engine cool. Thanks for the snarky replies, though. Always appreciated.
There are advantages and disadvantages. Low thermal efficiency , but very high volumetric efficiency, low weight, small packacking, less moving parts, smooth operation.. The high exhaust temps make them perfect for turbocharging, which then captures some of that energy, and puts it back to the intake side, effectively increasing compression ratio, effectively inceasing mechanical efficiency. It's easy to hate on it.. Only one manufacturer put any effort into it. If rotarys had the billions spent on research that reciprocating engines did, I bet they would be farther along... Fuel efficiency was the death of it.. But let me tell you.. they were FUN AS HELL to drive... Smooth, and REV to the moon, with no vibration... Mazda says they are still working.. I guess we will see.. But I kinda doubt it. With CAFE shit.. and the Govt preoccupation with hugging trees... I bet they are gone... So sad.
Actually heat is an enemy of turbochargers. Extremely hot exhaust gases will heat incoming air as it passes through the hot compressor and increase intake temperature, which is bad for making power.
it a total myth that the the rotary is a light engine their are standard production car piston engines that are lighter with the same power of an rx8.. and if you start looking at 2 stroke bike engine they have 2/3 more power pr cc and 1/2 the weight..the rotary not even close as the engines with the best power to weight ratio ..i don't know how this myth stated..properly marketing departments
blakeman8192 Heat and volume is what drives the turbo, I guess if it got hot enough what your saying would be true, But most have both oil to lube, and cool, and a engine coolant line into the center cartridge to bring down the heat to the engine coolat temp. The intake temps get plenty hot enough with the heat of comrpession.. Intercooler will help drop that down. Point being that rotarys drive turbos better than other engines..
kens97sto171 Good comments, The Wankel has more waste heat energy in the exhaust stream because its less mechanically efficient so there is more potential heat energy to run the exhaust turbine... of course the ideal operating temperature of the turbine is less than the peak EGT so more fuel enrichment is required... increasing BSFC even further. good for power, but not for overall combined cycle efficiency Increasing manfold boost pressure also increases stress on the the apex seals which tend to flutter and leak at high dynamic compression ratios... not good for longivity on an engine design that already has a very limited service life on average. cheers!
The real doktorbimmer The E shaft spins 270 degrees per phase (intake, compression, power, exhaust), but the port timing is still worked out in 180 degree increments of rotor phasing. The E shaft spins faster, in relation to, the rotor and its 4 "strokes". This is how you can figure that a rotary opens its exhaust "valve" earlier than a typical piston engine. There is no interrupted flow (obstruction--- Valve and stem) in the exhaust port. It is a straight shot. The valves remove alot of heat from a 4 cycle engine through the seat and guides. Only reason.
*Today marks the 6th anniversary of the end of RX production, on Thursday June 21, 2012 at **4:30**pm the final RX-8 car ever to be produced rolled off the assembly line, the last RX model to ever be produced by Mazda.*
+SnufflesDominance Piece of shite !!. Concept is all wrong. Horrid sort of stroker. I would be surprised if there was any material on this earth that would stand up the heat generated on the rotor apex seals for very long. The side seals seem to get away with it for longer. These engines by their design and 2 stroke principle have a high fuel consumption, high oil consumption and a high degree of wear to go with it. Useless for general road use. If you want power then don`t fuck around with this crap, get yourself a motor with a good V8 in it for muscle.
+Crobular I 1st - All modern rotary engines (ie anything done in the past 3 decades) are all 4 "stroke" type engine (although is more like 4 phases as it all happens almost at the same time). In 1 rotation the engine fires 3 times as oppose to a piston which does 1 every other. But it does have all 4 phases/strokes. 2nd - The engine on the Mazda 787b won in the 24 hour of Le Mans because of fuel economy and reliability. The only Japanese vehicle ever to do so. 3rd - all the new F1 engines are turbo V6. So the next high performance boost will be all in the V6 engines.
+Crumbly yes, and what load of old bollocks it is. It will never be any good for commuting around and taking the kids to school with it`s enormous thirst for gas and lousy emissions. I drove a saloon once and it went OK but the gas consumption was worse than my XJ8. Not to mention the total loss oil consumption. The whole concept is all wrong for it`s intended use. The specialist one in the video runs misfiring all over the place. If you think I am a prick them please tell me.
Meet Dr. James Lemke - a serial entrepreneur with a history of founding and leading companies to successful exits and a personal passion for science, engineering and education. Dr. Lemke founded Achates Power in 2004 with an idea that would revolutionize the automotive industry by revitalizing the opposed-piston, two-stroke engine. As an influential physicist holding more than 100 patents, Lemke understood that the rapidly increasing shortage of fuel and greater need for emissions reduction meant the world needed a solution. That solution came in a 1930s-era engine architecture that demonstrated great potential, but momentum had dissipated when the tools of the time could not produce an efficient version. Lemke knew the tools and the talent were now available to answer the transportation crisis. Dr. Lemke started Achates Power with a collection of the brightest engineers and scientists with the condition that ideas and discourse flow unabated and the expectation that each fulfill their utmost potential. While amassing top talent in the industry, Lemke’s vision began to manifest results. However, instead of an engine that only moderately answered the need for efficiency, the Achates Power engine realized a more than 30 percent fuel efficiency improvement compared to the industry’s best diesel engines and nearly double the fuel efficiency of a standard gasoline engine at lower emissions levels and at 10 percent lower cost. While Lemke always believed in the engine’s viability, now the results have shown the industry the potential economic savings of trillions of dollars per year on fuel and components, and billions of gallons of fuel saved per year. Please enjoy this biography on Dr. Lemke and the history of Achates Power.
I*T WAS THE BIGGEST ENGINEERING BLUNDER ENGINEERING BLUNDER ENGINEERING BLUNDER of the 21 century **and a lexus tech fixed the rotary engine for good**
Pascals Law refers to an equivalence of pressure and volume relationship. If you're increasing pressure, volume must decrease to maintain preservation of energy. Take a balloon for instance, if you decrease the size on one side, the opposite side increases to maintain volume relationship. So the argument does not pertain, the principal in essence is correct
great info when you line up a apex in the leading plug hole you see two chambers at the same time HEAT IS NO GOOD so two keep your turbo and engine in great shape you must stop the flames that are inside the engine before it ever comes out of the housings
+John Dickens didn't it also have something to do with the thermal imbalance in the engine, poor fuel efficiency, high maintenance, and poor power output compared to other engines? I'm not saying certain advancements haven't been thwarted by major manufacturers, they have been time and again. I'm just saying that in this case there were legitimate reasons for discontinuing use of the rotary engine.
***** Yes, you're probably right. It would have been interesting to see how they sorted all those issues. Unfortunately, the costs associated with going back to the drawing board on the rotary outweighed the time to market on an improved product. So they just allocated those r&d funds to furthering a more promising design. There's no question that the rotary was an ingenious piece of engineering though.
THE REAL DOKOTERBIMMER ROTARY* Torque, moment, or moment of force is rotational force.[1] Just as a linear force is a push or a pull, a torque can be thought of as a twist to an object. Mathematically, torque is defined as the cross product of the vector by which the force's application point is offset relative to the fixed suspension point (distance vector) and the force vector, which tends to produce rotational motion.
You’ve got to love a rotary engine, its so simple but powerful as hell for its size. I can remember getting an RX8 when I was 23 and absolutely loving it, before that little Mazda I had only had boring Renaults but this thing was a different world, it was so sporty, light and it just revved forever!! Yeah fuel wasn’t fantastic at about 20mpg, usually lower for me because I just couldn’t help myself but overall it was a brilliant car, it got me liking Mazda and I would of had another rotary if they did one but the next car was a Mazda 6 2.2 Sport which again was another fantastic car from Mazda, it was a completely different feel obviously but it was good all round, really fast for a diesel, quick uptake off the line for its size, mpg was fantastic I always got 50+ mpg easily, really great features, sensors etc for the cost of the car, more than you would get in a German brand anyway and just a great quality to the materials like leather etc top BOSE system etc I’ll have another Mazda for my next car I think ;)
*A perfect example of the primary problem with the Wankel engine... low thermal and mechanical efficiency that cause very high exhaust gas temperatures... a hot exhaust means that the heat energy of the fuel is not being converted into mechanical work or "torque".*
gav240z Fix? Actually no. your just creating new problems.. Wankel engines don't hold up very well with turbocharging... higher dynamic compression and higher combustion chamber temperatures tend to kill already highly stressed apex and side seals. Although turbocharging helps the poor thermal efficiency of the Wankel it can never fix the Wankels low mechanical conversion efficiency... its the same reason you can build a Wankel with good low rpm torque... due to the geometry of the orbiting pistons and eccentric crankshaft (there is only 16mm of stroke and pressure is applied indirectly at a low angle) it just does not convert combustion pressure into torque effectively... much the energy in the expanding gasses is wasted. That wasted heat is lost out the exhaust stream. Cheers!
doktorbimmer hello Good Doctor, well I guess we have different definitions of reliability when it comes to rotary's. Whilst I would agree that the apex seals are delicate, I have found my RX-7 to be reliable (it is twin turbo) and the real reliability issues come back to the tune. If run within correct parameters they are reliable and should delivery many trouble free miles. I agree on the low torque aspect but in my twin turbo FD they run sequentially and I find the torque quite good from low RPM. It is no tractor but turbo chargers definitely improve their efficiency. Of course the rotary isn't great for all applications but it certainly has it's niche.
You both have very valid points goods sirs. But in all fairnis the combustion engine is a very inefficient thing on its own, they all kinda float around 25-30% no matter what make. Just some food for thought.
piet joupoes The Wankel at best is only around 20-25%, only slightly better than steam engines, while modern car engines are now pushing 40-45%... Diesels can exceed 50% thermal efficiency.
dokterbimmer For an external applied force, the change in velocity depends on the mass of the object. A force will cause a change in velocity; and likewise, a change in velocity will generate a force. The equation works both ways. The third law states that for every action (force) in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, if object A exerts a force on object B, then object B also exerts an equal force on object A. Notice that the forces are exerted on different objects. The third law can be used to explain the generation of lift by a wing and the production of thrust by a jet engine. You can view a short movie of "Orville and Wilbur Wright" explaining how Newton's Laws of Motion described the flight of their aircraft. The movie file can be saved to your computer and viewed as a Podcast on your podcast player.
so here is something very interesting. So, Mazda sold close to 50,000 RX-8's in the U.S. from 04-08. Total Sales thru December of 2011: 2003 - 12,346 2004 - 23,690 2005 - 14,673 2006 - 9,343 2007 - 5,767 2008 - 3,368 2009 - less than 5,000 2010 - less than 5,000 2011 - less than 5,000 Mazda first opened a new rebuilding plant in Virginia specifically for RX-8 warranty replacement engines in May 2008 producing more than 5,000 remanufactured engines. Mazda expands plant in Chesterfield in June of 2011), they rebuilt another 5,000 engines in 2011. The plant has been around since 2008, so it's safe to say the yearly average is probably about the same thru that time period give or take a few hundred I would say. If they were still doing 5,000 rebuilds a year, two years after it opened then that means that the failure rate is close to 50%. (you have to account for people that got two engines under warranty). These figures do not include; engines rebuilt by outside subcontractors like Caterpillar power systems, new replacement engines from Japan or engines not covered by Mazda's warranty extension program and supplied by independent suppliers or engine shops. i was part of the rx8 team they fired me for being stupid so i went two youtube by the way i am ernie brink
kamencho1 Poor people don't buy new cars... new cars today typically come now with 100,000 mile powertrain warrantys... something not possible with a Wankel under the hood.Its also very common with proper maintance to see engines last 250,000 miles or more... something not possible with the Wankel either...Its why no one sells a car with a Wankel engine anymore... they are totally and completely obsolete now...
THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE 1080 degrees output
Here in California, the very first government agency was formed to introduce motor vehicle emissions standards in 1967, still the strictest air pollution standards in the world, Diesel fueled vehicles have always been classified as clean, low emissions vehicles and were even EXEMPT emissions regulations and the bi-annual testing program for 30 years. Yes, it is possible to observe something and still not understand what you are seeing.. especially if you are not knowledgeable on the issues. BY THE WAY IS IT A WANKEL OR ROTARY I NEED MY DO GOOD PILLS I AM LOST IN THE LORD
@@laszlopeterbalazs8040 So if the piston can complete the full cycle once per revolution it’s a 2 stroke, if the piston completes full cycle in two revolutions it’s a 4 stroke, three revolutions a 6-stroke.
Effectively banned... the 787s were already running in a lighter weight class and been allowed what was considered an unfair fuel consumption class advantage of much larger engines, the rule change requiring the 3.5 liter fuel consumption table and weight class had already been announced the year before the the Mazda win.. so not specifically banned by the FIA... Mazda simply chose not to meet the fuel consumption and weight requirements of the new class regulations....
The real doktorbimmer I know this was months ago, but finally! Someone who actually did research, instead of taking their knowledge from memes and telling everyone as though it was gospel.
Rotary engines now should replace the inane, wasteful piston engines. The past rotary engines problems of fuel mileage and seals reliability have long since been solved.
The wankel has worse problems and disadvantages compared to Otto or Diesel engines today than it did 50 years ago... Wankel engines are MORE wasteful than conventional engines.... THATS WHY THEY GET TERRIBLE FUEL MILEAGE. The problems with fuel mileage and poor reliability was solved.... manufacturers stopped selling them.. Mazda ended all production 2 1/2 years ago.
On the contrary, the Wankel equipped with the now solved seals problem, and current engine operating computer...the problems are now solved. But the profits and the will are lacking.
Joseph Rotello Yea Joe. DoktorBimmer still thinks the rotary engines of the 80s were the same as the shitty ones from europe in the 60s. He doesnt know that rotary engines can go to upwards of 300,000 miles.
***** Im not saying its impressive. Simply saying how far they can go. I currently have an rx7 but I'm not a rotary fanboy simply for defending misinformation. Out of my top 3 favorite motors, 2 are piston engines. The F20c, RB26/2jz (Kinda tied), and then the 3 rotor 20b. I like the 26b 4 rotor better but I dont think id ever be able to own it.
Here in California, the very first government agency was formed to introduce motor vehicle emissions standards in 1967, still the strictest air pollution standards in the world, Diesel fueled vehicles have always been classified as clean, low emissions vehicles and were even EXEMPT emissions regulations and the bi-annual testing program for 30 years. Yes, it is possible to observe something and still not understand what you are seeing.. especially if you are not knowledgeable on the issues.
INFINITI’s new VC-Turbo (Variable Compression Turbo) is the world’s first production-ready variable compression ratio engine. Promising to be one of the most advanced internal combustion engines ever created, VC-Turbo technology combines the power of a high-performance 2.0-liter turbo gasoline engine with the torque and efficiency of an advanced diesel powertrain - without the equivalent emissions.
Awesome Dyno run of the 4 rotor. So, this is what? About a 2600cc engine putting out about 700 hp naturally aspirated (all motor)? I know that most builders add rotors to increase displacement but has there ever been a "Big Block" rotary designed with larger scale housings and rotors? I know these engines have amazing output per liter but was wondering what a larger scale one would do. Also, has anyone experimented with direct injection like a lot of production piston engines are going to now?
+manstersr Yep, it does about 700HP naturally aspirated. The later version, used in the 787B could go up to 960HP in qualifying, but was detuned to 700HP for reliability and fuel consumption in the race. Not that reliability was an issue; Mazda's engineers, when disassembling the engine after the race, found such little wear, that they estimated that the engine could've ran for another 24 hours without any issue. As for your question regarding the "Big Block" rotary, I think the current sizes are used because they seem to be the optimal size from both an engineering and reliability standpoint.
I know this is a very old video. But, I've always wondered the same thing. My thoughts are If you take a 12a 1.1 but double it to 2.2 " with bigger rotors and housings", wouldn't that eliminate the twist problem that 4 rotor engines have? I'm no engineer by any stretch but I've always thought about that as well
**d*oktorbimmerERNIEBRINK JUST THE FACTS HERE ERNIE, MAZDA WANKEL ENGINES .. THEY ARE ON FIRE** doktorbimmerERNIEBRINK doktorbimmer 2 months ago GOD HATES THE ROTARY doktorbimmer doktorbimmer 2 months ago WHY HATH GOD FORSAKEN THEE ERNIE? doktorbimmer doktorbimmer 2 months ago GOD SHALL SMITE THEE AS A BLASPHEMER. doktorbimmer doktorbimmer 2 months ago ERNIE! WHY DO YOU BARE FALSE WITNESS BEFORE THE LORD? Ernie Brink Ernie Brink 2 weeks ago (edited) Some Other Dude BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY For a guy who claims to be an engineer, you sure spew a lot of ad-hominem attacks… no one here ever once said any new cars were getting wankel engines. What we are saying is the engine does have merits. Some in the transportation industry like the simplicity, some like the compactness, some like the free revving ability M1NH5AN3 M1NH5AN3 1 year ago Some Other Dude watch this, he'll ask you irrelevant questions and change the subject, so he doesn't have to answer your questions. Then he will make fun of you and accuse you of being wrong Lisa Giannini Lisa Giannini 1 week ago (edited) wankel good cmment some other dude
a brilliant mazda and lexus mechanic (who obsesses about rotary engines the way ferrari owners obsess about their paint finish) has stumbled across two mechanical breakthroughs that could make the rotary a total lunatic on the track as it ought to be simple, straightforward
THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE WHEN THE LEADING PLUG HOLE STOPS LEAKING FUEL INTO THE EXHAUST HOT PIPES
@@xkexke8081 That is a typical wankel. My first experience with them was in the mid-70's in snowmobiles, I was always amazed how bright the pipe would glow, even in the -40 degree winter cold. They blow allot of burning fuel out the port. Just one of the reasons they are terribly fuel inefficient. The wankel design is overall around 35% less efficient when compared on a BTU-input VS HP output to a reciprocating piston engine.
@@CaberFeidh great comment the fix is the leading plug hole leaks inside the engine this why hot pipes why did you tell him you are out of your mind.? i like BTU-input VS HP btu in the pipes hp loss not in the chamber to burn? great job nothing burned no hp
@Maimo Moline There are home built experimental airplanes that are powered by lawn mower engines too but like the handful of Wankel planes none are FAA certified as airworthy.
Terrible airplane engine: Too many rpm, it would require a reduction drive resulting in more weight, complexity, and maintenance. Terrible economy, more fuel = more weight... or less range = pointless. Apex seal wear results in costly short TBO's Anyway, I could ramble on, but in short... it'd be a shit airplane engine.
The trailing side of the rotary engine's combustion chamber develops a squeeze stream which pushes back the flamefront. With the conventional one or two-spark-plug system and homogenous mixture, this squeeze stream prevents the flame from propagating to the combustion chamber's trailing side in the mid and high engine speed ranges, Mazda engineers described the full process in 'Combustion characteristics of Rotary Engines', K Yamamoto et al., SAE paper 720357. Kawasaki addressed this problem in their US patent nº 3848574. This poor combustion in the trailing side of chamber is one of the reasons why there is more carbon monoxide and unburnt hydrocarbons in a Wankel's exhaust stream. A side-port exhaust, as is used in the Renesis, avoids one of the causes of this because the unburned mixture cannot escape. The Mazda 26B avoided this issue through a 3-spark plug ignition system. (At the Le Mans 24 hour endurance race in 1991 the 26B had significantly lower fuel consumption than the competing reciprocating piston engines. All competitors had the same amount of fuel available due to the Le Mans 24 hour limited fuel quantity rule.)[56] An inventor proposed that a narrow linear opening for spark plugs in the housing, instead of the round hole, would improve volumetric efficiency, fuel economy and emissions; he claims to have proved this by recording a measured reduction in the exhaust gas temperature. As in early reciprocating engines, a lower effective compression ratio is linked to higher exhaust gas temperatures.* *(CZcams: 'Rotary Engine Breakthrough')*
Here in California, the very first government agency was formed to introduce motor vehicle emissions standards in 1967, still the strictest air pollution standards in the world, Diesel fueled vehicles have always been classified as clean, low emissions vehicles and were even EXEMPT emissions regulations and the bi-annual testing program for 30 years. Yes, it is possible to observe something and still not understand what you are seeing.. especially if you are not knowledgeable on the issues. BY THE WAY IS IT A WANKEL OR ROTARY I NEED MY DO GOOD PILLS I AM LOST IN THE LORD
I'm the first one who asked several questions of you in this latest round of the internet trolling you. And you still haven't responded specifically to those questions.
Heat = energy - so that's an awful lot of energy going straight out of the tail pipe. My brother came to see me a while back, and he commented how the heater in his car comes up to temperture much quicker than it does in my car. Then it struck me - his is petrol (gasolene) driven; mine is diesel. I guess that's why diesels are so much more economical - they use less of their fuel to produce heat - which blows out of the exhaust. For a similar performance car, he gets around 40 MPG. I get 60.
Very true, the hot pipes indicate very high exhaust gas temperature and a lot of wasted horsepower going out the tailpipe. The Wankel engine has among the lowest thermal efficiency (Carnot cycle) of any internal combustion engine.. which mean they produce less power per kilogram/pound of fuel used Diesel engines on the other hand are one of the most efficient.
Ehh, not quite but kinda. Diesel engines are more economical than gasoline engines, because gasoline engines don't burn very much of the fuel that goes into the engine. Diesel engines burn a lot more of the fuel. The fact that his car heats up faster is something entirely different, likely it has a smaller coolant capacity.
+Will S. Sorry Will, that assessment is not accurate, The Wankel engine in particular has typically very high EGT because it simply does not convert as much of the heat energy into work.. thus the exiting exhaust gas temperature is noticeably much higher. The different between the intake temperature and the exhaust gives as the Carnot Cycle efficiency... the greater the difference the lower the engines efficiency. this effect has absolutely nothing to do with coolant capacity or fuel consumption.
+The real doktorbimmer I was replying to the original poster, who believed the difference between him and his brothers vehicles time spent heating up, was that his was gasoline and his brother's was diesel
Today is June 22nd the 9th anniversary of the final end of Wankel engine production. At 4:30pm Tokyo time on June 22, 2012 Mazda produced its very last Wankel engine. The Wankel engine assembly plant at Mazda's Ujina #2 plant shut down and was later demolished to make way for a new Skyactiv G engine factory.
Felix Wankel saw an internal combustion engine, and immediately thought to himself, "Cool, but I bet I can do it with triangles."
For that reason alone, he's my hero
"Triangle stronk"
-Felix Wankel
@@straightbusta2609 whoa! easy there, i love his invention too but man was a mental nazi
@@chiefdenis I'm just glad the version that ran swasticas lost out to the triangle one
@@ashwatson2142 lmao
Apex seals: aight, imma head out
original
@@tk-uq3kd secondary
@@lance2152 and primary
When it is too dark to work on your engine and have no light source so you try an alternate method.
Wonder what the efficiency is after that
The most creative people are motivated by the grandest of problems that are presented before them
YOU MUST BE THE REAL ERNIE BRINK DOKTERBIMMER ENGINEER
*The Wankel engine is revolutionary*
How does this only have one like?
@@benlilly711 too many rpms for most to understand..
Terrible
Not anymore
Winkles discharge a lot of hydrocarbons in their exhaust That's why you're seeing the headers turn cherry red
I feel like the only one yelling "turn the lights off!!!" To see the glowing exhaust.
The dorito nust be hot af
Some Other Dude
he's not my friend, I live 3000 miles away on the east coast. Although he's a mechanic and not a scholarly engineer, I see no evidence he's a drinker. And the world needs guys like him. Sometimes thats where the breakthroughs come from.
I'm the first one who asked several questions of you in this latest round of the internet trolling you. And you still haven't responded specifically to those questions.
How can anyone love cars, and not love the wankel? heard Mazda was making a new wankel in 2020
MAZDA AND TOYOTA CRUSHING NEWS
as Ernie Brink said, by changing sparkplug hole geometry by a very thin flat hole (height of the hole will have the same thickness as apex seal) , but too narrow hole could diminish the effectiveness of the spark,I think we can go bigger in the height of the hole without really having consequant gas exchange between compression chamber and exhaust chamber. Other ideas from Ernie Brink are very interesting and pertinant and there are still more possibility to improve the rotary engine
chatter marks need to be fixed piston rings are fine
THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE
efficient is not the right word for a wankel, it makes more power on a lower volume engine but it consumes more gas to do so
When my wife is talking angry.
😂😂😂
she's a keeper!
Am I the only guy who is curious about what a 5 rotor would sound like?
No
It would probably go from sounding like a pissed off pig to a pissed off dragon.
But I would love if there was one created!
Well you can listen to a 6 rotor if you search for it
No
Can't touch this, MC Hammer told me...............
*WHERE IS YOUR ENGINE ERNIE BRINK????? ITS BEEN HALF A DECADE AND STILL NOTHING BUT SHIT TALK FROM YOU*
*WHY ARE THEY NO LONGER MADE?????*
i am comeing out with a video
@@doktorbimmer a 14mm leading plug hole is the problem meeting a 2mm apex
@@dokterbimmer7270 AWESOME
Le Mans winner Johnny Herbert reunited with the screaming Mazda 787B
One of the fundamental flaws in the Wankel design was the troublesome shape of its internal components... cylinders and spherical shapes are ideal for ensuring even and consistent thermal expansion and contraction and the clearances between the moving parts, stationary parts and most importantly the sealing parts... Like the Newcomen steam engine, one of the Wankel's major flaws is that it is required to maintain high temperatures and colder temperatures with in the same housing, high wear rates and low thermal efficiency is the end result.
what a fantastic design... No matter how bad the disadvantages are. I really hope they can find solutions for these problems some day.
531
this engine is a head of its time
Lol it has flawed engineering, that's why Mazda stopped making them. They're a neat design and have proven they can make power but reliable power? Not happening 🤣. The 787B like this one here needs a complete rebuild after every run almost like a nitro engine, except it's not sheer horsepower tearing this engine up its the overall wankel design. They're only sought after by Mazda enthusiasts not people trying to get the most bang for their buck.
@@JBeamGT3 shut the fuck up einstein
@@JBeamGT3 if they could perfect making good apex seals then that’s it would be a far better easy to maintain engine that can produce crazy power with low displacement
@@JBeamGT3 what a stupid statement. Like if all the other engines on a 24h race don't need rebuilding. Mazda finished and won. Others didn't with reliability issues. Unfortunately Mazda Wankel engine was banned by the fucking FIA, otherwise they would probably do it again.
@@whisperdancer June 22nd is the 9 year anniversary of the final end of Wankel engine production.
At 4:30pm Tokyo time on June 22, 2012 Mazda produced its very last Wankel engine.
The Wankel engine assembly plant at Mazda's Ujina #2 plant shut down and was later demolished to make way for a new Skyactiv G engine factory.
Rotary motor explained...Wankel engines, more commonly known as rotary engines, differ from regular engines as they don’t have a reciprocating piston travelling up and down in a cylinder. Instead a triangular shaped rotor spins inside an hour-glass shaped housing. Valves in the casings allow gases to transfer, similar to a two-stroke, but unlike a reciprocating engine all the parts inside move in the same direction. This means the engine is smooth, compact and capable of delivering a high power-to-weight ratio
At Mazda, a team of 50 searches for rotary-engine breakthrough
IT IS A MARVELOUS PIECE OF ENGINEERING
Dude you've put like 30 comments chill out
The way Ernie Brink described it, it makes sense that it would greatly minimize if not almost eliminate compression & mixture loss as well as reduce exhaust temps. Reduced exhaust temps would also translate to a cooler motor.
This is my Dad's Dyno, when I was a kid I used to vaporise Gummibears on the exaust manifolds when my Dad was testing. These are only Red hot, they would get White hot after a longer run...
piston engines blow right out the side of the block wankel engines just keep running
You mean reciprocating engine?
Remember the reciprocating saw "Zaw Saw"?
The blade goes up and down just like a piston.
It's only 6k rpm. At this rpm no piston engines bursts! And F1 engines -all are piston engines- revs up to 18k rpm! Don't comment without knowledge. Wankel engines are unefficient and weak. That's why they couldn't get widespread.
Gökçer Alp Inefficient, yes. Weak, no. Slap a turbski on them and them suckers will rip
@@gokceralp İf you talking about torque yes, horsepower no.
Gökçer'in Sesi yes unefficient... but better than piston in lots of ways. Once u get into rotarys, you can’t get out.
"youll blow the welds off your intake kid"
Haha that's good shit right there
Published on Dec 24, 2012The Wankel engine always held out a lot of promise, but never was able to fully deliver on those promises. It was never very fuel efficient, and the exhaust temperatures were very high. But now an independent car tech thinks he has stumbled onto what held that engine back. rotary engine breakthrough rotary hemi breakthrough will come alive but you shall receive power efficiency and might when the holy spirit has come upon you and you shall be my witnesse,s thank you all love you
Get more video everyday at autolineRead more Show less Reply 1
Mazda, The amazing Little car company, by North American Operations CEO, Masahiro Moro WATCH THIS ON YOU TUBE
THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE
1
when your mixtape is in the fuel tank
dakken BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY
WHY ARE THE PIPES ON FIRE?
+ernie brink *All the horsepower is being wasted out the exhaust*
+ernie brink *Wankel engines are obsolete because they are terribly inefficient*
ernie brink
ernie brink
3 days ago (edited)
the real doc bimmer r look more names awesome
1 second ago
Guess Who
Guess Who
22 minutes ago
It is still a HIGH MAINTENANCE - EVEN MORE SO NOW - STOICHIOMETRIC IC ENGINE HYDROCARBON EMITTING PIECE OF JUNK REGARDLESS!
Ernie Brink
Ernie Brink
10 minutes ago
ARE YOU A FAULT FINDER HOPE NOT GOD BLESS YOU
Ernie Brink
Ernie Brink
4 minutes ago
Guess Who
Guess Who
16 hours ago
Wankel will never completely replace piston engines!
Ernie Brink
Ernie Brink
23 minutes ago
GUESS WHO AWESOME SPIRIT
0 DEGREES JUST LIKE THE MR BRINK?
Some Other Dude
Some Other Dude
3 days ago (edited)
+ doktor
Dude at this point it's you who is looking ridiculous. You have repeated yourself literally hundreds of times. Let it go. Right or wrong, there will be people in the world who have opinions which differ from yours. It's part of the human condition. You're smart enough to know a lot of things, why can't you grasp this? Ernie's beliefs and conclusions are not in perfect agreement with yours. Give it a 'shrug' and stop trying to single-handedly 'correct' every person on the planet with respect to mazda/wankels/rotaries.
Feeling hot,hot,hot....a bit more,and you have a drop of exhaust header on the floor ...Lol!!
BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY
This engine came out of the Mazda 767b at downing atlanta
+TheMercurial7 How are you keeping this thing cool while it's running? I see that big orange tube. Is that blowing cold air on the engine?
+Neur0n911 No....these are the exhaust pipes.
Hot air comes out of them, and the more the engine is running at high RPM, the hotter it gets.
+Neur0n911 Where is your brain?
By this thing, I meant the whole engine. I understand those are exhaust pipes that are glowing hot. What I mean is, when you're doing a dyno tune, you have a giant fan keeping the engine cool. I was just asking what was keeping this engine cool. Thanks for the snarky replies, though. Always appreciated.
Neur0n911 An absolute pleasure...
хорошая печка, только шумит сильно.
так и отопление дорогое выходит ппц
Интересно, если раскалить до бела, то трубы выхлопного коллектор могут прогореть в местах изгиба? Или оплавиться частично?
@@ThePlate1977 скорее всего это титановый выпуск, стоит шумашедших денег, весит мало, он то врятли прогорит даже от 1300°
@александр отчетков выпуск не титан, расплавить врятли получиться а вот подольше пороботает то прогорит. Печка хорошая и жрёт не мало😂😩
@александр отчетков ротор четыре секции, только вот сколько в нём кобыл? Больше тысячи?
he still has his blinders on
There are advantages and disadvantages. Low thermal efficiency , but very high volumetric efficiency, low weight, small packacking, less moving parts, smooth operation.. The high exhaust temps make them perfect for turbocharging, which then captures some of that energy, and puts it back to the intake side, effectively increasing compression ratio, effectively inceasing mechanical efficiency. It's easy to hate on it.. Only one manufacturer put any effort into it. If rotarys had the billions spent on research that reciprocating engines did, I bet they would be farther along... Fuel efficiency was the death of it.. But let me tell you.. they were FUN AS HELL to drive... Smooth, and REV to the moon, with no vibration... Mazda says they are still working.. I guess we will see.. But I kinda doubt it. With CAFE shit.. and the Govt preoccupation with hugging trees... I bet they are gone... So sad.
Actually heat is an enemy of turbochargers. Extremely hot exhaust gases will heat incoming air as it passes through the hot compressor and increase intake temperature, which is bad for making power.
it a total myth that the the rotary is a light engine their are standard production car piston engines that are lighter with the same power of an rx8.. and if you start looking at 2 stroke bike engine they have 2/3 more power pr cc and 1/2 the weight..the rotary not even close as the engines with the best power to weight ratio ..i don't know how this myth stated..properly marketing departments
blakeman8192 Heat and volume is what drives the turbo, I guess if it got hot enough what your saying would be true, But most have both oil to lube, and cool, and a engine coolant line into the center cartridge to bring down the heat to the engine coolat temp. The intake temps get plenty hot enough with the heat of comrpession.. Intercooler will help drop that down. Point being that rotarys drive turbos better than other engines..
kens97sto171 Good comments, The Wankel has more waste heat energy in the exhaust stream because its less mechanically efficient so there is more potential heat energy to run the exhaust turbine... of course the ideal operating temperature of the turbine is less than the peak EGT so more fuel enrichment is required... increasing BSFC even further. good for power, but not for overall combined cycle efficiency
Increasing manfold boost pressure also increases stress on the the apex seals which tend to flutter and leak at high dynamic compression ratios... not good for longivity on an engine design that already has a very limited service life on average.
cheers!
The real doktorbimmer
The E shaft spins 270 degrees per phase (intake, compression, power, exhaust), but the port timing is still worked out in 180 degree increments of rotor phasing. The E shaft spins faster, in relation to, the rotor and its 4 "strokes". This is how you can figure that a rotary opens its exhaust "valve" earlier than a typical piston engine. There is no interrupted flow (obstruction--- Valve and stem) in the exhaust port. It is a straight shot. The valves remove alot of heat from a 4 cycle engine through the seat and guides. Only reason.
Chuck Norris uses the headers to light up his cigar
Nah, he uses the Saturn V.
bobelaviador chuck norris lights up a cigar with a cigar
JUST THE FACTS THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE
chuck norris is lit
rip
*Today marks the 6th anniversary of the end of RX production, on Thursday June 21, 2012 at **4:30**pm the final RX-8 car ever to be produced rolled off the assembly line, the last RX model to ever be produced by Mazda.*
ERNIE BRINK THANK YOU FOR THE WANKEL ENGINES
put your tip on it
+SnufflesDominance Piece of shite !!. Concept is all wrong. Horrid sort of stroker. I would be surprised if there was any material on this earth that would stand up the heat generated on the rotor apex seals for very long. The side seals seem to get away with it for longer. These engines by their design and 2 stroke principle have a high fuel consumption, high oil consumption and a high degree of wear to go with it. Useless for general road use. If you want power then don`t fuck around with this crap, get yourself a motor with a good V8 in it for muscle.
+Crobular lok up the 2jz and rb26 motor, then rethink ur heavy v8
+Crobular I
1st - All modern rotary engines (ie anything done in the past 3 decades) are all 4 "stroke" type engine (although is more like 4 phases as it all happens almost at the same time). In 1 rotation the engine fires 3 times as oppose to a piston which does 1 every other. But it does have all 4 phases/strokes.
2nd - The engine on the Mazda 787b won in the 24 hour of Le Mans because of fuel economy and reliability. The only Japanese vehicle ever to do so.
3rd - all the new F1 engines are turbo V6. So the next high performance boost will be all in the V6 engines.
+Crobular I Mopar
+Crumbly yes, and what load of old bollocks it is. It will never be any good for commuting around and taking the kids to school with it`s enormous thirst for gas and lousy emissions. I drove a saloon once and it went OK but the gas consumption was worse than my XJ8. Not to mention the total loss oil consumption. The whole concept is all wrong for it`s intended use. The specialist one in the video runs misfiring all over the place. If you think I am a prick them please tell me.
That happens if the ignition timing is delayed, it has low thermal efficiency, most of the energy is thrown out at the exhaust.
+Odouls77 Like some early strokers. Unless they were "on the pipe".
Meet Dr. James Lemke - a serial entrepreneur with a history of founding and leading companies to successful exits and a personal passion for science, engineering and education. Dr. Lemke founded Achates Power in 2004 with an idea that would revolutionize the automotive industry by revitalizing the opposed-piston, two-stroke engine. As an influential physicist holding more than 100 patents, Lemke understood that the rapidly increasing shortage of fuel and greater need for emissions reduction meant the world needed a solution. That solution came in a 1930s-era engine architecture that demonstrated great potential, but momentum had dissipated when the tools of the time could not produce an efficient version. Lemke knew the tools and the talent were now available to answer the transportation crisis. Dr. Lemke started Achates Power with a collection of the brightest engineers and scientists with the condition that ideas and discourse flow unabated and the expectation that each fulfill their utmost potential. While amassing top talent in the industry, Lemke’s vision began to manifest results. However, instead of an engine that only moderately answered the need for efficiency, the Achates Power engine realized a more than 30 percent fuel efficiency improvement compared to the industry’s best diesel engines and nearly double the fuel efficiency of a standard gasoline engine at lower emissions levels and at 10 percent lower cost. While Lemke always believed in the engine’s viability, now the results have shown the industry the potential economic savings of trillions of dollars per year on fuel and components, and billions of gallons of fuel saved per year. Please enjoy this biography on Dr. Lemke and the history of Achates Power.
BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY AND NOW IN DIESEL
ROTARY DIESEL OUTBOARD AWESOME
*Look how far you've come!"*
Mazda is bringing back the rotary engine in 2022
I*T WAS THE BIGGEST ENGINEERING BLUNDER ENGINEERING BLUNDER ENGINEERING BLUNDER of the 21 century **and a lexus tech fixed the rotary engine for good**
If only that heat could be captured and converted into zoom zoom...
Pascals Law refers to an equivalence of pressure and volume
relationship. If you're increasing pressure, volume must decrease to
maintain preservation of energy. Take a balloon for instance, if you
decrease the size on one side, the opposite side increases to maintain
volume relationship. So the argument does not pertain, the principal in
essence is correct
great info when you line up a apex in the leading plug hole you see two chambers at the same time HEAT IS NO GOOD so two keep your turbo and engine in great shape you must stop the flames that are inside the engine before it ever comes out of the housings
cook your breakfast across the room with that thing
I don't know shit about engines... So I'm just going to say that those pipes look kinda warm..
Lmao just a lil bit 😂
+John Dickens didn't it also have something to do with the thermal imbalance in the engine, poor fuel efficiency, high maintenance, and poor power output compared to other engines? I'm not saying certain advancements haven't been thwarted by major manufacturers, they have been time and again. I'm just saying that in this case there were legitimate reasons for discontinuing use of the rotary engine.
*****
Yes, you're probably right. It would have been interesting to see how they sorted all those issues. Unfortunately, the costs associated with going back to the drawing board on the rotary outweighed the time to market on an improved product. So they just allocated those r&d funds to furthering a more promising design. There's no question that the rotary was an ingenious piece of engineering though.
Those are headers, bitch.
+The Gaming Chicken It's the same thing dumb fuck.
THE REAL DOKOTERBIMMER ROTARY*
Torque, moment, or moment of force is rotational force.[1] Just as a linear force is a push or a pull, a torque can be thought of as a twist to an object. Mathematically, torque is defined as the cross product of the vector by which the force's application point is offset relative to the fixed suspension point (distance vector) and the force vector, which tends to produce rotational motion.
ha, I work on commercial power equipment as well as cars and I can tell you the engineers don't always get it right by a long shot!
THINK OF ALL THE FUEL AND PUMPING LOSS ?
fuck it idles a bit high.
+wipout1 its a PP engine they idle high.
+Nff
this is one hell of a way to warm up and engine.
I think the fluro pink exhaust looks gay though
THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY
You’ve got to love a rotary engine, its so simple but powerful as hell for its size.
I can remember getting an RX8 when I was 23 and absolutely loving it, before that little Mazda I had only had boring Renaults but this thing was a different world, it was so sporty, light and it just revved forever!!
Yeah fuel wasn’t fantastic at about 20mpg, usually lower for me because I just couldn’t help myself but overall it was a brilliant car, it got me liking Mazda and I would of had another rotary if they did one but the next car was a Mazda 6 2.2 Sport which again was another fantastic car from Mazda, it was a completely different feel obviously but it was good all round, really fast for a diesel, quick uptake off the line for its size, mpg was fantastic I always got 50+ mpg easily, really great features, sensors etc for the cost of the car, more than you would get in a German brand anyway and just a great quality to the materials like leather etc top BOSE system etc I’ll have another Mazda for my next car I think ;)
@@footballcoreano bruh, how about trying old BMWs and old mercedes
that exhaust manifold sure got a bit soft there.
Yes, shame to have wasted all that heat ... a nice chunk of good steak or bacon would have done nicely on that!
EXACTLY what I was thinking! Lol
those high hp suckers need lotsa airflow n cooling
*A perfect example of the primary problem with the Wankel engine... low thermal and mechanical efficiency that cause very high exhaust gas temperatures... a hot exhaust means that the heat energy of the fuel is not being converted into mechanical work or "torque".*
You can of course fix this issue with a turbo. Rotors spool big turbo's quick.
gav240z Fix? Actually no. your just creating new problems.. Wankel engines don't hold up very well with turbocharging... higher dynamic compression and higher combustion chamber temperatures tend to kill already highly stressed apex and side seals.
Although turbocharging helps the poor thermal efficiency of the Wankel it can never fix the Wankels low mechanical conversion efficiency... its the same reason you can build a Wankel with good low rpm torque... due to the geometry of the orbiting pistons and eccentric crankshaft (there is only 16mm of stroke and pressure is applied indirectly at a low angle) it just does not convert combustion pressure into torque effectively... much the energy in the expanding gasses is wasted. That wasted heat is lost out the exhaust stream.
Cheers!
doktorbimmer hello Good Doctor, well I guess we have different definitions of reliability when it comes to rotary's. Whilst I would agree that the apex seals are delicate, I have found my RX-7 to be reliable (it is twin turbo) and the real reliability issues come back to the tune. If run within correct parameters they are reliable and should delivery many trouble free miles.
I agree on the low torque aspect but in my twin turbo FD they run sequentially and I find the torque quite good from low RPM. It is no tractor but turbo chargers definitely improve their efficiency. Of course the rotary isn't great for all applications but it certainly has it's niche.
You both have very valid points goods sirs. But in all fairnis the combustion engine is a very inefficient thing on its own, they all kinda float around 25-30% no matter what make. Just some food for thought.
piet joupoes The Wankel at best is only around 20-25%, only slightly better than steam engines, while modern car engines are now pushing 40-45%... Diesels can exceed 50% thermal efficiency.
dokterbimmer
For an external applied
force, the change in velocity depends on the mass of the object. A force will
cause a change in velocity; and likewise, a change in velocity will generate
a force. The equation works both ways.
The third law states that for every action (force)
in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, if object
A exerts a force on object B, then object B also exerts an equal force on object
A. Notice that the forces are exerted on different objects. The third law can
be used to explain the generation of lift by a wing
and the production of thrust by a jet engine.
You can view a short
movie
of "Orville and Wilbur Wright" explaining how Newton's Laws of Motion
described the flight of their aircraft. The movie file can
be saved to your computer and viewed as a Podcast on your podcast player.
so here is something very interesting. So, Mazda sold close to 50,000 RX-8's in the U.S. from 04-08. Total Sales thru December of 2011: 2003 - 12,346 2004 - 23,690 2005 - 14,673 2006 - 9,343 2007 - 5,767 2008 - 3,368 2009 - less than 5,000 2010 - less than 5,000 2011 - less than 5,000 Mazda first opened a new rebuilding plant in Virginia specifically for RX-8 warranty replacement engines in May 2008 producing more than 5,000 remanufactured engines. Mazda expands plant in Chesterfield in June of 2011), they rebuilt another 5,000 engines in 2011. The plant has been around since 2008, so it's safe to say the yearly average is probably about the same thru that time period give or take a few hundred I would say. If they were still doing 5,000 rebuilds a year, two years after it opened then that means that the failure rate is close to 50%. (you have to account for people that got two engines under warranty). These figures do not include; engines rebuilt by outside subcontractors like Caterpillar power systems, new replacement engines from Japan or engines not covered by Mazda's warranty extension program and supplied by independent suppliers or engine shops. i was part of the rx8 team they fired me for being stupid so i went two youtube by the way i am ernie brink
Sounds like a leaf blower
Awesomeface Yeah sounds like 5x more horsepower than ur car
BroSorry yeah and about 1/50th the service life before a rebuild too
The real doktorbimmer 'Service life' is part of poor people's vocabulary
kamencho1 Poor people don't buy new cars... new cars today typically come now with 100,000 mile powertrain warrantys... something not possible with a Wankel under the hood.Its also very common with proper maintance to see engines last 250,000 miles or more... something not possible with the Wankel either...Its why no one sells a car with a Wankel engine anymore... they are totally and completely obsolete now...
The real doktorbimmer You are everywhere in car videos.
BroSorry Sound does not equal power. Honda comes to mind.
And time for a rebuild
THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE 1080 degrees output
Here in California, the very first government agency was formed to introduce motor vehicle emissions standards in 1967, still the strictest air pollution standards in the world, Diesel fueled vehicles have always been classified as clean, low emissions vehicles and were even EXEMPT emissions regulations and the bi-annual testing program for 30 years. Yes, it is possible to observe something and still not understand what you are seeing.. especially if you are not knowledgeable on the issues. BY THE WAY IS IT A WANKEL OR ROTARY I NEED MY DO GOOD PILLS I AM LOST IN THE LORD
the v 12 was invented 1912
1932 Packard Twin-Six:
@@laszlopeterbalazs8040 So if the piston can complete the full cycle once per revolution it’s a 2 stroke, if the piston completes full cycle in two revolutions it’s a 4 stroke, three revolutions a 6-stroke.
Somebody needs to reimagine the spark plug flat and round in the firing chamber
Wankel, the only engine design banned from LeMans. Haters gonna hate.
Effectively banned... the 787s were already running in a lighter weight class and been allowed what was considered an unfair fuel consumption class advantage of much larger engines, the rule change requiring the 3.5 liter fuel consumption table and weight class had already been announced the year before the the Mazda win.. so not specifically banned by the FIA... Mazda simply chose not to meet the fuel consumption and weight requirements of the new class regulations....
The real doktorbimmer I know this was months ago, but finally! Someone who actually did research, instead of taking their knowledge from memes and telling everyone as though it was gospel.
Rotary engines now should replace the inane, wasteful piston engines. The past rotary engines problems of fuel mileage and seals reliability have long since been solved.
The wankel has worse problems and disadvantages compared to Otto or Diesel engines today than it did 50 years ago...
Wankel engines are MORE wasteful than conventional engines.... THATS WHY THEY GET TERRIBLE FUEL MILEAGE.
The problems with fuel mileage and poor reliability was solved.... manufacturers stopped selling them.. Mazda ended all production 2 1/2 years ago.
On the contrary, the Wankel equipped with the now solved seals problem, and current engine operating computer...the problems are now solved. But the profits and the will are lacking.
Joseph Rotello
Yea Joe. DoktorBimmer still thinks the rotary engines of the 80s were the same as the shitty ones from europe in the 60s. He doesnt know that rotary engines can go to upwards of 300,000 miles.
***** Im not saying its impressive. Simply saying how far they can go. I currently have an rx7 but I'm not a rotary fanboy simply for defending misinformation. Out of my top 3 favorite motors, 2 are piston engines. The F20c, RB26/2jz (Kinda tied), and then the 3 rotor 20b. I like the 26b 4 rotor better but I dont think id ever be able to own it.
The real doktorbimmer Yes the current/old/last mazda design is. The latest designs are very efficient.
Here in California, the very first government agency was formed to introduce motor vehicle emissions standards in 1967, still the strictest air pollution standards in the world, Diesel fueled vehicles have always been classified as clean, low emissions vehicles and were even EXEMPT emissions regulations and the bi-annual testing program for 30 years. Yes, it is possible to observe something and still not understand what you are seeing.. especially if you are not knowledgeable on the issues.
INFINITI’s new VC-Turbo (Variable Compression Turbo) is the world’s first production-ready variable compression ratio engine. Promising to be one of the most advanced internal combustion engines ever created, VC-Turbo technology combines the power of a high-performance 2.0-liter turbo gasoline engine with the torque and efficiency of an advanced diesel powertrain - without the equivalent emissions.
it looks ineficient as fuck... but runs so SMOOTHLY!!!
+Ramon Pardo extremely inefficient..
REDACTED THEY ARE MORE EFFICIENT
The greatest scientific thinkers are those who rely on sudden intuitive flashes to solve problems"
think about it 6 chambers 1080 degrees output vs a six cylinder piston engine at 720 degrees output awesome fuel mileage
WANKEL ROTARY DIESELS LIVE AWESOME
Awesome Dyno run of the 4 rotor. So, this is what? About a 2600cc engine putting out about 700 hp naturally aspirated (all motor)? I know that most builders add rotors to increase displacement but has there ever been a "Big Block" rotary designed with larger scale housings and rotors? I know these engines have amazing output per liter but was wondering what a larger scale one would do. Also, has anyone experimented with direct injection like a lot of production piston engines are going to now?
+manstersr Yep, it does about 700HP naturally aspirated. The later version, used in the 787B could go up to 960HP in qualifying, but was detuned to 700HP for reliability and fuel consumption in the race. Not that reliability was an issue; Mazda's engineers, when disassembling the engine after the race, found such little wear, that they estimated that the engine could've ran for another 24 hours without any issue.
As for your question regarding the "Big Block" rotary, I think the current sizes are used because they seem to be the optimal size from both an engineering and reliability standpoint.
I know this is a very old video. But, I've always wondered the same thing. My thoughts are If you take a 12a 1.1 but double it to 2.2 " with bigger rotors and housings", wouldn't that eliminate the twist problem that 4 rotor engines have? I'm no engineer by any stretch but I've always thought about that as well
THE ONLY SUCCESSFULLY MASS PRODUCED ENGINE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY 1
6 CHAMBERS 3 TURNS FOR OUTPUT ? 6 CYLINDERS TWO TURNS FOR OUTPUT ?
1
**d*oktorbimmerERNIEBRINK
JUST THE FACTS HERE ERNIE, MAZDA WANKEL ENGINES .. THEY ARE ON FIRE**
doktorbimmerERNIEBRINK
doktorbimmer
2 months ago
GOD HATES THE ROTARY
doktorbimmer
doktorbimmer
2 months ago
WHY HATH GOD FORSAKEN THEE ERNIE?
doktorbimmer
doktorbimmer
2 months ago
GOD SHALL SMITE THEE AS A BLASPHEMER.
doktorbimmer
doktorbimmer
2 months ago
ERNIE! WHY DO YOU BARE FALSE WITNESS BEFORE THE LORD?
Ernie Brink
Ernie Brink
2 weeks ago (edited)
Some Other Dude BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY
For a guy who claims to be an engineer, you sure spew a lot of ad-hominem attacks… no one here ever once said any new cars were getting wankel engines. What we are saying is the engine does have merits. Some in the transportation industry like the simplicity, some like the compactness, some like the free revving ability
M1NH5AN3
M1NH5AN3
1 year ago
Some Other Dude watch this, he'll ask you irrelevant questions and change the subject, so he doesn't have to answer your questions. Then he will make fun of you and accuse you of being wrong
Lisa Giannini
Lisa Giannini
1 week ago (edited)
wankel good cmment some other dude
THE
FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A WANKEL
ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE
1
piston engines are evolutionary but the wankel engine is revolutionary
BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY THE ROTARY
Why Is A Rotary Better Than A V-8
a brilliant mazda and lexus mechanic (who obsesses about rotary engines
the way ferrari owners obsess about their paint finish) has stumbled
across two mechanical breakthroughs that could make the rotary a total
lunatic on the track as it ought to be simple, straightforward
THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A
WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE WHEN THE LEADING PLUG HOLE STOPS LEAKING FUEL INTO THE EXHAUST HOT PIPES
you are out of your mind.
@@CaberFeidh ZERO TOLERANCE ON LEAKAGE
@@CaberFeidh all the heat is going into the pipes missing the combustion chamber ?
@@xkexke8081 That is a typical wankel. My first experience with them was in the mid-70's in snowmobiles, I was always amazed how bright the pipe would glow, even in the -40 degree winter cold. They blow allot of burning fuel out the port. Just one of the reasons they are terribly fuel inefficient. The wankel design is overall around 35% less efficient when compared on a BTU-input VS HP output to a reciprocating piston engine.
@@CaberFeidh great comment the fix is the leading plug hole leaks inside the engine this why hot pipes why did you tell him you are out of your mind.? i like BTU-input VS HP btu in the pipes hp loss not in the chamber to burn? great job nothing burned no hp
yay now i know how to make glow in the dark headers!
Jelani Yaqoub and also a way to kill your ears
THAT'S THE SPIRIT I LOVE THE LORD THE ONLY SUCCESSFULLY MASS PRODUCED ENGINE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY
Holy unburnt fuel, batman!
LOOK AT THAT CUSTOM ROTOR HOUSING
*after this session, the engine was rebuilt once again*
Well that's why Mazda stopped making them over half a decade ago Lol!
Ernie Brink What the fuck.
+Olli Lehtonen Just ignore Ernie (or whatever his real name is) He is clearly a mental case.
Ernie Brink u can think of all that. and that's with a nob in is mouth to we'll Don haha
ERNIE BRINK ask your mum ha
*FORGIVENESS IS A GIFT FROM GOD*
**Mazda only makes cars with rotary reciprocating engines now.**
***FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE MY NAME IS DOKTERBIMMER THE REAL FAKE I AM A FAKE ENGINEER***
ERNIE BRINK FIXED THOSES HOT PIPES
Throw a bucket of water on those hot pipes.... PUM!
What could make an incredible airplane engine!
Wankel engines are too unreliable for airplanes.
@Maimo Moline There are home built experimental airplanes that are powered by lawn mower engines too but like the handful of Wankel planes none are FAA certified as airworthy.
@Maimo Moline There are none with a airworthiness certificate... Wankel engines are too unreliable and totally unsuitable for aircraft.
Terrible airplane engine:
Too many rpm, it would require a reduction drive resulting in more weight, complexity, and maintenance.
Terrible economy, more fuel = more weight... or less range = pointless.
Apex seal wear results in costly short TBO's
Anyway, I could ramble on, but in short... it'd be a shit airplane engine.
@@dash8465 That is exactly why not a single aircraft manufacturer sells a plane with a Wankel engine.
The trailing side of the rotary engine's combustion chamber develops a squeeze stream which pushes back the flamefront. With the conventional one or two-spark-plug system and homogenous mixture, this squeeze stream prevents the flame from propagating to the combustion chamber's trailing side in the mid and high engine speed ranges, Mazda engineers described the full process in 'Combustion characteristics of Rotary Engines', K Yamamoto et al., SAE paper 720357. Kawasaki addressed this problem in their US patent nº 3848574. This poor combustion in the trailing side of chamber is one of the reasons why there is more carbon monoxide and unburnt hydrocarbons in a Wankel's exhaust stream. A side-port exhaust, as is used in the Renesis, avoids one of the causes of this because the unburned mixture cannot escape. The Mazda 26B avoided this issue through a 3-spark plug ignition system. (At the Le Mans 24 hour endurance race in 1991 the 26B had significantly lower fuel consumption than the competing reciprocating piston engines. All competitors had the same amount of fuel available due to the Le Mans 24 hour limited fuel quantity rule.)[56] An inventor proposed that a narrow linear opening for spark plugs in the housing, instead of the round hole, would improve volumetric efficiency, fuel economy and emissions; he claims to have proved this by recording a measured reduction in the exhaust gas temperature. As in early reciprocating engines, a lower effective compression ratio is linked to higher exhaust gas temperatures.* *(CZcams: 'Rotary Engine Breakthrough')*
Jesus Christ am I the only person on here that is aware of the forces at work here !?
THE REAL DOKTERBIMMER ERNIEBRINK
IT IS A MARVELOUS PIECE OF ENGINEERING
BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY
HEMI ROTARY AWESOME
Here in California, the very first government agency was formed to introduce motor vehicle emissions standards in 1967, still the strictest air pollution standards in the world, Diesel fueled vehicles have always been classified as clean, low emissions vehicles and were even EXEMPT emissions regulations and the bi-annual testing program for 30 years. Yes, it is possible to observe something and still not understand what you are seeing.. especially if you are not knowledgeable on the issues. BY THE WAY IS IT A WANKEL OR ROTARY I NEED MY DO GOOD PILLS I AM LOST IN THE LORD
The greatest scientific thinkers are those who rely on sudden intuitive flashes to solve problems"
@@erniebrinkrotaryhemi7336 a 14mm leading plug hole is the problem meeting a 2mm apex
I'm the first one who asked several questions of you in this latest round of the internet trolling you. And you still haven't responded specifically to those questions.
Hell of a good built motor
Thank you for the video!Thank you for the video! great job ernie brink a mazda and lexus tech outstanding video
Heat = energy - so that's an awful lot of energy going straight out of the tail pipe.
My brother came to see me a while back, and he commented how the heater in his car comes up to temperture much quicker than it does in my car. Then it struck me - his is petrol (gasolene) driven; mine is diesel. I guess that's why diesels are so much more economical - they use less of their fuel to produce heat - which blows out of the exhaust. For a similar performance car, he gets around 40 MPG. I get 60.
Very true, the hot pipes indicate very high exhaust gas temperature and a lot of wasted horsepower going out the tailpipe. The Wankel engine has among the lowest thermal efficiency (Carnot cycle) of any internal combustion engine.. which mean they produce less power per kilogram/pound of fuel used
Diesel engines on the other hand are one of the most efficient.
Ehh, not quite but kinda. Diesel engines are more economical than gasoline engines, because gasoline engines don't burn very much of the fuel that goes into the engine. Diesel engines burn a lot more of the fuel. The fact that his car heats up faster is something entirely different, likely it has a smaller coolant capacity.
+Will S. Sorry Will, that assessment is not accurate, The Wankel engine in particular has typically very high EGT because it simply does not convert as much of the heat energy into work.. thus the exiting exhaust gas temperature is noticeably much higher.
The different between the intake temperature and the exhaust gives as the Carnot Cycle efficiency... the greater the difference the lower the engines efficiency. this effect has absolutely nothing to do with coolant capacity or fuel consumption.
+The real doktorbimmer I was replying to the original poster, who believed the difference between him and his brothers vehicles time spent heating up, was that his was gasoline and his brother's was diesel
+Will S Otto engines have higher heat rejection.
Today is June 22nd the 9th anniversary of the final end of Wankel engine production.
At 4:30pm Tokyo time on June 22, 2012 Mazda produced its very last Wankel engine.
The Wankel engine assembly plant at Mazda's Ujina #2 plant shut down and was later demolished to make way for a new Skyactiv G engine factory.
What's up with the pink octopus attach to the engine? Not cool!
woop woop, look at dr. Zoidberg, the engine owner.
Hello Kitty exhaust manifold
what's up with this bat shit crazy guy ernie brink?
doktorbimmer it's you
THE REAL ERNIE BRINK hi is your mum missing me XXX
what if someone put that in a go cart
Nicolas Williams that's a fast go cart
The only thing for certain, You would have an unreliable go-cart
yes BEST ENGINE OF THE 21 CENTURY
*_And , the first engine to become obsolete in the 21st Century_*
Rotary engine inventor doctor Felix Wankel born August 13 1902 The Wankel engine is revolutionary
*BE NOT WISE IN YOUR OWN EYES*
THE FOUR STROKES OF A INTERNAL COMBUSTION OCCURS SIMULTANEOUSLY IN A
WANKEL ENGINE THIS MAKES IT MORE EFFICIENT THAN A PISTON ENGINE
2