If we're talking about how squares are rectangles but rectangles are not necessarily squares, I think that same sort of distinction applies here. Mythicals are naturally *more* than legendary, so it makes little sense to say "nuh-uh, that's not a legendary it's a mythical." That sort of statement is almost reductive, and we've already established mythicals are elevated in some way. They *are* legendary, and then some (just as squares *are* rectangles, and then specified even further by possessing 4 equal side lengths). The Pokémon Company has a pattern of referring to these Pokémon by their most specific categorization. For Mewtwo, Lugia, etc. that would be legendary. For Mew, Deoxys, etc. that would be mythical, yet mythicals still also have this subcategory or secondary categorization of legendary (The Pokémon Company simply ignores this most of the time, leading to the confusion illustrated in this video). There is a distinction to be made, but this video went about it the wrong way in eliminating Darkrai from the 'best legendary' example they opened with. If they wanted to better explain this point, the question should have been 'what is the best non-mythical legendary Pokémon?'
The "oversaturation" problem effects Legendaries too... There are SO MANY legendaries now! Each generation adds progressively more (with Scarlet/Violet adding a whopping *12* if you count Pecharunt), and a lot of them don't even feel like they needed to be legendary... Like, you mean to tell me that _Munkidori_ is considered a legendary??? You kidding??? And despite many legendaries groups like the "legendary birds" and the "legendary beasts" having less restrictions in the Battle Facilities, they still share the same title as the bigger stronger box legendaries like Kyogre, Groudon, and Rayquaza. The classifications of legendaries is ridiculous. Not to mention there's also all the Pokemon that aren't considered "legendary," but still have the stats akin to them, like the Ultra Beasts and the Paradox Pokemon. :/
This is extremely valid. I don’t mind having new mythicals, legendaries, paradox, ultra beasts, etc, added. I just wish they had more consideration put into them. I want more special rare pokemon to feel special and rare lol. Appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment! Thank you for watching🥳
I think the last gen legendaries are quite good as they aren't trying to go over the top We have reached the top, now it's good to have local legends which influence only the area surrounding them
Tbh I have never felt the "oversaturation" of mythical or legendaries that other people do. I always love getting new ones and seeing what they're like, even if some of them are misses
@@Shinntoku exactly, not to mention how every culture has their own legends and myths so it makes sense for the pokemon regions to each have their own legendary and mythical pokemon
To be fair, there's at least on some level a separation between Box Legendaries and others, like how in Sun and Moon's pokedex, Box Legends (and Mythicals) had a gold background while other "special" pokemon (mostly lesser legendary pokemon) had a green one. I'm pretty sure that I read somewhere that for that game at least, non-cover legendaries were even internally labelled as "Sub-Legendary" so there's at least a bit of clear distinction there
Myticals being only seperated since gen 5 is only half true. In Japan, they where always set apart from normal legendarys. It was more or less a translation error to group them togetger outside japan.
I loved the mythical Pokemon distribution events as a kid, especially since they usually had little side quests, like the Darkrai one. I really wish they would at least go back to having in game events for them.
Hell yeah. I was brainstorming changes that could be made in a Z kalos game, and we thought of side quests for the kalos mythicals, imagine hearing about a super rare Pokémon seen in reflection cave after getting a reflective amulet or something as the quest item, and ending up in a little part of a mirrored kalos, like in the anime episode, seeing a good version of Lysandres defending diancie from an evil sycamore or evil versions of your friends, having to help him, before he asks you to take diancie to your world to keep it away from that worlds team flare. Or facing a boss level malva in the steam plant to save volcanion
! Gen 4 in general is just super special to me so that one as well as the celebi event always stand out to me. It would definitely be cool seeing something added to ZA the same way there were mythical side quests for legends arceus!
To me this has always felt more like a gimmick rather than anything else. I do think it’s innovative in a way, just kind of corny Thank you for watching :))
For me Zeraora is symptomatic for the meaningless Mythicals. It's like the most uninteresting example of that Pokémon group. It's been a throw-away gift with no lore at all and even its own movie didn't make it any more interesting. It's just there. For me it's no different from the other furry-mons Lucario and Zoroark with the only difference being you can only get it once.
I think the problem was that they were created almost entirely for movies, but gen 1-3 did make their in game lore interesting. then with mythicals like Manaphy and Shaymin the movie side won for gen 5-8. for example, gen 8's Zarude has zero in game involvement. but Pecharunt has no movie yet and is heavily based on the in game story, so I think we're back on the right track for mythicals.
The distinction for me has to do with their availablity in VGC. Legendaries, even box art ones when a generation is nearing it's end, are able to be used in events like Worlds and regionals, where as Mythicals have all been banned in every event since.
The time of secrets and myths is over the internet and social media doesn’t allow things to not be spoiled unless they start foreshadowing future Pokémon
I don’t think that’s entirely true. Take into consideration games like Elden Ring. There is so much hidden lore and special side quests despite being all over the internet and social media. I will agree I think it’s much harder for secrets and myths, but with more consideration I think it’s possible. Thank you for watching and I appreciate the comment! 🥳
What they should be doing is how they inserted Meloetta into the Scarlet and Violet DLC. Where getting Meloetta was going through steps that dataminers found out. Spinning around and using the sepia filter was so good!
As someone who has been trying to make a “it’s all connected” theory for mythicals and legendaries Shaymin and Zarude feel less “legendary” and more “endangered species” because we see that they can be found in groups Zeraora doesn’t have that luxury because it has NOTHING to work with, it’s just “electric cat Lucario/Zoroark” (and honestly I thought it would have been a 1 gen only mythical like how Zoroark was event only in Black and White or how Lucario is technically gen 3 before it became available to own in gen 4)
@@Shinntoku well I like to think that most legendaries are one-offs I.E. Arceus is Poke-god, Dialga, Palkia, and Giratina are it’s three deity kids, Celebi is connected to Dialga, Hoopa is connected to Palkia, the lake trio help create Mew
@@typemasters2871 see I agree the Lake Trio and Celebi are one-offs, but Arceus can create new Dialgas, Palkias, Giratinas and even Arceuses, and Mew were a wide-spread species that dwindled over time as newer, more diverse pokemon began to proliferate
@@Shinntoku indeed, I said that most legendaries would be one-offs One-offs would include Pokemon who have implied roles in the creation or maintaining of the world (Groudon, Kyogre, creation trio, lake trio) Whilst non one-offs would be Pokemon that can be found in groups (Shaymin, Zarude) or are implied to have more than one (Mew, Lati twins, Galarian kanto birds?) Of course Arceus can just create more one-offs if he so wishes, and Arceus himself is one entity with multiple bodies
The main thing I remember about Zarude is that he has springy vine limbs, like Salada, a much cooler event-only plant related creature from another Nintendo game in the same genre...
I like that alot of mythicals have stories or reasons why they're rare such as arcues being god, celebi being a time travelling protector of the forest, mew being a very limited number as the majority have spread out and devrloped into other species. I personally like the idea that manaphy are extremely rare because of their circumstances, manaphy eggs only being able to be formed in a specific environment, and hatched through a connect to a person, (like the ancient undersea people who are long gone from the movie), so manaphy eggs are super rare, and eggs formed outside the specific area arent quite right and become phione
Ok I think this is a fair take honestly. Maybe Manaphy is a bit more than just water togepi after all. Thanks for the comment!🥳 …Phione still kinda sucks tho
I'd argue that mythicals are anything but integral to a game's region & story, simply because they're usually not even brought up at all or barely referenced by anyone. Of course, 3rd entries of a generation (or DLC) may work them in a bit or even allow you to catch mythicals from older games, but rarely is the newest one of a gen even relevant. It doesn't help that for much of Pokémon's history, they only made them available outside the game at random events. Most of these felt very disjointed & unrewarding, as you were just given them with barely any in-game effort. And the first few games never even made a distinction between mythicals in the West- they were all just legendaries. In that regard, they just felt like these random gimmick Pokémon meant to promote something & could be mostly ignored.
Honestly I don't want a direct story connected to the event necessarily, but environmental storytelling. Locations that are connected to said mythical pokemon, little hints about their existence that you can discover during the game before reaching a specific location or using a tool to actually get it. I personally do not want an extension of the main story with the mythical pokemon cause it feels as it cheapens the experience when other characters are involved but I'm the one destined to get the pokemon just cause the game requires so:is much more realistic being the first one to reach a specific area and finding a specific pokemon for the first time in a world that is rather large to explore. Having an extremly long explanation about the pokemon origin by other characters and being forced to find the mythical pokemon as part of a dlc is not as cool as reaching a new place on your own, with 0 or very few mysterious characters, and get your new mysterious creature
This is actually a fair point it really seems like a healthy compromise between the two options we’ve gotten. It’s very much like mew in Gen 1 only being mentioned from old journal entries. Thanks for watching!
Zeraora and Zarude, especially the former, should be like the Lucario of their respective generations, not Mythicals. Theirs designs just don't scream "Mythical" or "Legendary" to me. And Zeraora should've gotten the Electric/Fighting type combination first, not the Pawmi family.
Mythicals are a subcategory of legendary, always have been, it's just one Bulbapedia editor's wild misconception which was added without fact checking and later attempted to post-justify it with miscontrude quotes.
Mythical Pokemon are legendary Pokemons, not all legendary Pokemon are Mythical Pokemon. Mythical Pokemon are the ones that can't be obtained in the generation they are introduced, and can just be gotten from an event.
Meltan, Manaphy and (Dada) Zarude coming from media outside the main games i feel helps thier relation to being mythical, it's just that the story of them isn't in the main games.
Yeah I don’t mind the lore being outside of the main games, I just miss mythicals in general having significant lore at all. I don’t dislike any of them by any means, some just don’t feel deserving of the exclusivity and status of the title.
I’ve always grouped special Pokemon under a legendary umbrella. So stuff like mythicals, ultra beasts and paradoxes, while not labeled as legendarys, I personally consider them almost like a branch of the whole legendary classification. That being said, like you mentioned, mythicals tended to have a story and a reason to be mythical. With Mons like Volcanion, Zeraora and Zarude, while they do have lore, I feel like it’s not conveyed as strongly as it should. So that’s why those ones tend to be quite forgettable compared to something like Mew or Deoxys. Ok, enough yapping. Good vid!
That’s a good way to look at it! I agree, some mythicals don’t have as much consideration put into them as others. It’s a huge bummer because a lot of these pokemon have potential to be great! I appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment! It’s always fun reading other peoples opinions on these topics. Thanks for watching 🥳
While gen 9 finaly did justice to a mythcial pokemon with pecharunt its also in a weird spot where walkign wake and iron leave are also event exclsuive mons for some reason but are not mythicals at all. especialy since teh pecharunt event is just avaible for anytone with the dlc while the other 2 show up occatialy as a raid event only
The Theory of Mythicals is a preview of the next Generations. Ex, Meloetta is to Gen 6 Kalos/France although Ballet originated in Italy Genesect is both past and future combined that can be alluded with Scarlet/Violet to mention that standard Genesect is Purple while Shiny is Red.
Interesting discussion 🤔 I think in some instances this could be the case. I will say, I personally don’t think there is any correlation between genesect and gen 9. I think that is probably just a coincidence but it is still a fun thought! Thanks for the comments 🥳
oh also mythical pokemon are legendary. they are only mythical becuase they are event pokemon. they are all legendary. saying they are different is wrong
@paulycrossing cool. mythical pokemon are legendary pokemon that are given through events they are the same thing. what is the different? how they are given is not what makes them different they are just legendary
The distinction for me has always been as simple as "Was it only obtainable via mystery gift in it's debut gen? If yes mythical, if no legendary."
Does manaohy egg via ranger count as mystery gift?
@@StarWyvernHPB Close enough
Yep this right here
@@StarWyvernHPB Yeah, especailly since later Ranger games had a mystery gift for the quest for Manaphy egg
@@nexenojustice552 yeah, but it's also available through non mystery gift in ranger 1
always thought of it like how a square is a technically a rectangle, they might not be "legendary" in name but they carry the same weight
Mythicals are legendaries
If we're talking about how squares are rectangles but rectangles are not necessarily squares, I think that same sort of distinction applies here. Mythicals are naturally *more* than legendary, so it makes little sense to say "nuh-uh, that's not a legendary it's a mythical." That sort of statement is almost reductive, and we've already established mythicals are elevated in some way. They *are* legendary, and then some (just as squares *are* rectangles, and then specified even further by possessing 4 equal side lengths).
The Pokémon Company has a pattern of referring to these Pokémon by their most specific categorization. For Mewtwo, Lugia, etc. that would be legendary. For Mew, Deoxys, etc. that would be mythical, yet mythicals still also have this subcategory or secondary categorization of legendary (The Pokémon Company simply ignores this most of the time, leading to the confusion illustrated in this video).
There is a distinction to be made, but this video went about it the wrong way in eliminating Darkrai from the 'best legendary' example they opened with. If they wanted to better explain this point, the question should have been 'what is the best non-mythical legendary Pokémon?'
Id honestly think the mythicals would be a more solid group if phione, meltan, melmetal, zeraora and zarude weren't counted
Completely agree!!
The "oversaturation" problem effects Legendaries too... There are SO MANY legendaries now! Each generation adds progressively more (with Scarlet/Violet adding a whopping *12* if you count Pecharunt), and a lot of them don't even feel like they needed to be legendary... Like, you mean to tell me that _Munkidori_ is considered a legendary??? You kidding???
And despite many legendaries groups like the "legendary birds" and the "legendary beasts" having less restrictions in the Battle Facilities, they still share the same title as the bigger stronger box legendaries like Kyogre, Groudon, and Rayquaza. The classifications of legendaries is ridiculous.
Not to mention there's also all the Pokemon that aren't considered "legendary," but still have the stats akin to them, like the Ultra Beasts and the Paradox Pokemon. :/
This is extremely valid. I don’t mind having new mythicals, legendaries, paradox, ultra beasts, etc, added. I just wish they had more consideration put into them. I want more special rare pokemon to feel special and rare lol.
Appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment! Thank you for watching🥳
I think the last gen legendaries are quite good as they aren't trying to go over the top
We have reached the top, now it's good to have local legends which influence only the area surrounding them
Tbh I have never felt the "oversaturation" of mythical or legendaries that other people do. I always love getting new ones and seeing what they're like, even if some of them are misses
@@Shinntoku exactly, not to mention how every culture has their own legends and myths so it makes sense for the pokemon regions to each have their own legendary and mythical pokemon
To be fair, there's at least on some level a separation between Box Legendaries and others, like how in Sun and Moon's pokedex, Box Legends (and Mythicals) had a gold background while other "special" pokemon (mostly lesser legendary pokemon) had a green one. I'm pretty sure that I read somewhere that for that game at least, non-cover legendaries were even internally labelled as "Sub-Legendary" so there's at least a bit of clear distinction there
Myticals being only seperated since gen 5 is only half true. In Japan, they where always set apart from normal legendarys. It was more or less a translation error to group them togetger outside japan.
Right that’s true, I was just mainly referring to the term being introduced in America. I appreciate the comment 🥳🫶
I call Mythicals EELs. Event Exclusive Legendaries.
Because they should be Legendaries but they aren't.
Ooooo EEL’s I like that
@@paulycrossing "Those are the shrieking EELs!"
*intense Darkrai noises*
I loved the mythical Pokemon distribution events as a kid, especially since they usually had little side quests, like the Darkrai one. I really wish they would at least go back to having in game events for them.
Hell yeah. I was brainstorming changes that could be made in a Z kalos game, and we thought of side quests for the kalos mythicals, imagine hearing about a super rare Pokémon seen in reflection cave after getting a reflective amulet or something as the quest item, and ending up in a little part of a mirrored kalos, like in the anime episode, seeing a good version of Lysandres defending diancie from an evil sycamore or evil versions of your friends, having to help him, before he asks you to take diancie to your world to keep it away from that worlds team flare. Or facing a boss level malva in the steam plant to save volcanion
! Gen 4 in general is just super special to me so that one as well as the celebi event always stand out to me.
It would definitely be cool seeing something added to ZA the same way there were mythical side quests for legends arceus!
Meltan was a good mhytical it showed up and nobody knew what it was or where it was from
Ontop of that nobody expected a completely original Pokémon from GO
To me this has always felt more like a gimmick rather than anything else. I do think it’s innovative in a way, just kind of corny
Thank you for watching :))
And then it just kinda left, and was never heard from again
To me Mythicals were always a sub-category of Legendary Pokemon. Being Mythical doesnt mean the Mon cant be Legendary at the same time
All mythicals are legendries, but not all legendries are mythical. That's how that works.
For me Zeraora is symptomatic for the meaningless Mythicals. It's like the most uninteresting example of that Pokémon group. It's been a throw-away gift with no lore at all and even its own movie didn't make it any more interesting. It's just there. For me it's no different from the other furry-mons Lucario and Zoroark with the only difference being you can only get it once.
This is why I loved mochi mayhem so much
It really was one of the better events we’ve gotten in recent years
I love when the legendary is a guarundteed catch so I can catch them in a rare ball (I think I got my pecharunt in a love ball)
The Guaranteed catches are great! I think I got my Pecharunt in a Dream Ball.
I really liked the really playground rumor type way you get Meloetta in the Scarlet and Violet DLC
I think the problem was that they were created almost entirely for movies, but gen 1-3 did make their in game lore interesting.
then with mythicals like Manaphy and Shaymin the movie side won for gen 5-8.
for example, gen 8's Zarude has zero in game involvement.
but Pecharunt has no movie yet and is heavily based on the in game story, so I think we're back on the right track for mythicals.
The distinction for me has to do with their availablity in VGC. Legendaries, even box art ones when a generation is nearing it's end, are able to be used in events like Worlds and regionals, where as Mythicals have all been banned in every event since.
Oh wow what an interesting perspective! I don’t play competitive too often, I forgot they were all banned
The time of secrets and myths is over the internet and social media doesn’t allow things to not be spoiled unless they start foreshadowing future Pokémon
I don’t think that’s entirely true. Take into consideration games like Elden Ring. There is so much hidden lore and special side quests despite being all over the internet and social media.
I will agree I think it’s much harder for secrets and myths, but with more consideration I think it’s possible.
Thank you for watching and I appreciate the comment! 🥳
Bro that thumbnail looks SICK!
I appreciate the kind words! 🥳
What they should be doing is how they inserted Meloetta into the Scarlet and Violet DLC. Where getting Meloetta was going through steps that dataminers found out. Spinning around and using the sepia filter was so good!
As someone who has been trying to make a “it’s all connected” theory for mythicals and legendaries
Shaymin and Zarude feel less “legendary” and more “endangered species” because we see that they can be found in groups
Zeraora doesn’t have that luxury because it has NOTHING to work with, it’s just “electric cat Lucario/Zoroark” (and honestly I thought it would have been a 1 gen only mythical like how Zoroark was event only in Black and White or how Lucario is technically gen 3 before it became available to own in gen 4)
Tbh I've always seen Legendaries and especially Mythicals as endangered or at least very rare but not actually being one-offs(usually)
@@Shinntoku well I like to think that most legendaries are one-offs
I.E.
Arceus is Poke-god, Dialga, Palkia, and Giratina are it’s three deity kids, Celebi is connected to Dialga, Hoopa is connected to Palkia, the lake trio help create Mew
@@typemasters2871 see I agree the Lake Trio and Celebi are one-offs, but Arceus can create new Dialgas, Palkias, Giratinas and even Arceuses, and Mew were a wide-spread species that dwindled over time as newer, more diverse pokemon began to proliferate
@@Shinntoku indeed, I said that most legendaries would be one-offs
One-offs would include Pokemon who have implied roles in the creation or maintaining of the world (Groudon, Kyogre, creation trio, lake trio)
Whilst non one-offs would be Pokemon that can be found in groups (Shaymin, Zarude) or are implied to have more than one (Mew, Lati twins, Galarian kanto birds?)
Of course Arceus can just create more one-offs if he so wishes, and Arceus himself is one entity with multiple bodies
I once heard and strongly agree with "Every Mythical is a Legendary but not every Legendary is a Mythical."
The main thing I remember about Zarude is that he has springy vine limbs, like Salada, a much cooler event-only plant related creature from another Nintendo game in the same genre...
I wonder if there should be a new classification for these Pokémon to explain their significance in the world.
Sounds like something we should discuss in a video or something 👀
if the glove don't fit you must acquit
This comment is a certified hood classic
I like that alot of mythicals have stories or reasons why they're rare such as arcues being god, celebi being a time travelling protector of the forest, mew being a very limited number as the majority have spread out and devrloped into other species.
I personally like the idea that manaphy are extremely rare because of their circumstances, manaphy eggs only being able to be formed in a specific environment, and hatched through a connect to a person, (like the ancient undersea people who are long gone from the movie), so manaphy eggs are super rare, and eggs formed outside the specific area arent quite right and become phione
Ok I think this is a fair take honestly. Maybe Manaphy is a bit more than just water togepi after all. Thanks for the comment!🥳
…Phione still kinda sucks tho
"Jirachi is the weaker of the two"
Serene Grace Iron Head spam would like to have a talk with you
I too found it strange that Zarude was a grass primate when the Grookey line was a starter from the same game and generation.
I would classify mythical as a subset of legendary Pokémon.
I don't believe the games ever established a connection between Team Rocket and Mewtwo aside from Giovanni having it in USUM.
Gen 1 games sort of did, with Giovanni wanting the Master Ball, which fits Mewtwo to a T.
It’s a squares/rectangles situation. Mythicals are legendaries, but not all legendaries are mythical.
No
@@enoyna1001no
No
You are firing up content man! Keep it up! Amazing video as always
Always love hearing from you man, I appreciate this tons!! 🫶
I'd argue that mythicals are anything but integral to a game's region & story, simply because they're usually not even brought up at all or barely referenced by anyone.
Of course, 3rd entries of a generation (or DLC) may work them in a bit or even allow you to catch mythicals from older games, but rarely is the newest one of a gen even relevant.
It doesn't help that for much of Pokémon's history, they only made them available outside the game at random events. Most of these felt very disjointed & unrewarding, as you were just given them with barely any in-game effort.
And the first few games never even made a distinction between mythicals in the West- they were all just legendaries. In that regard, they just felt like these random gimmick Pokémon meant to promote something & could be mostly ignored.
Honestly I don't want a direct story connected to the event necessarily, but environmental storytelling. Locations that are connected to said mythical pokemon, little hints about their existence that you can discover during the game before reaching a specific location or using a tool to actually get it. I personally do not want an extension of the main story with the mythical pokemon cause it feels as it cheapens the experience when other characters are involved but I'm the one destined to get the pokemon just cause the game requires so:is much more realistic being the first one to reach a specific area and finding a specific pokemon for the first time in a world that is rather large to explore. Having an extremly long explanation about the pokemon origin by other characters and being forced to find the mythical pokemon as part of a dlc is not as cool as reaching a new place on your own, with 0 or very few mysterious characters, and get your new mysterious creature
This is actually a fair point it really seems like a healthy compromise between the two options we’ve gotten. It’s very much like mew in Gen 1 only being mentioned from old journal entries. Thanks for watching!
'Fi-on' 3:50 everyone knows it's 'fi-on-ni'
Oops
Pronunciation is not this guy's strong suit
@@zoroearc2582 at least I could pronounce ur moms name last night
Zeraora and Zarude, especially the former, should be like the Lucario of their respective generations, not Mythicals. Theirs designs just don't scream "Mythical" or "Legendary" to me.
And Zeraora should've gotten the Electric/Fighting type combination first, not the Pawmi family.
Mythicals are a subcategory of legendary, always have been, it's just one Bulbapedia editor's wild misconception which was added without fact checking and later attempted to post-justify it with miscontrude quotes.
Mythical Pokemon are legendary Pokemons, not all legendary Pokemon are Mythical Pokemon.
Mythical Pokemon are the ones that can't be obtained in the generation they are introduced, and can just be gotten from an event.
Meltan, Manaphy and (Dada) Zarude coming from media outside the main games i feel helps thier relation to being mythical, it's just that the story of them isn't in the main games.
Yeah I don’t mind the lore being outside of the main games, I just miss mythicals in general having significant lore at all. I don’t dislike any of them by any means, some just don’t feel deserving of the exclusivity and status of the title.
I’ve always grouped special Pokemon under a legendary umbrella. So stuff like mythicals, ultra beasts and paradoxes, while not labeled as legendarys, I personally consider them almost like a branch of the whole legendary classification.
That being said, like you mentioned, mythicals tended to have a story and a reason to be mythical. With Mons like Volcanion, Zeraora and Zarude, while they do have lore, I feel like it’s not conveyed as strongly as it should. So that’s why those ones tend to be quite forgettable compared to something like Mew or Deoxys.
Ok, enough yapping. Good vid!
That’s a good way to look at it! I agree, some mythicals don’t have as much consideration put into them as others. It’s a huge bummer because a lot of these pokemon have potential to be great! I appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment! It’s always fun reading other peoples opinions on these topics.
Thanks for watching 🥳
“All mythicals are legendaries, but not all legendaries are mythicals”
While gen 9 finaly did justice to a mythcial pokemon with pecharunt its also in a weird spot where walkign wake and iron leave are also event exclsuive mons for some reason but are not mythicals at all. especialy since teh pecharunt event is just avaible for anytone with the dlc while the other 2 show up occatialy as a raid event only
That’s a really good point. We’ll see what the future holds, but I really hope to see more events like this. Thanks for the comment🥳
oh hi big sister (shiny celebi)
....... i miss you... it's been a while since me and you talked. i miss you....
There is some unresolved trauma in this comment I can feel it
@paulycrossing shiny celebi is my older sister... i miss her )':
If it's gotten via paid methods (dlc) or limited time. Or both (looking at you pogo and dlc)
It's mythical. At least you paid for it this time
I luv victini as a mythical 😍😍 always mysterious to me but I always wanted one cos it’s so cuterrr
Mythicals are just legendaries lol
Aren't mythical a subset of legendary?? That's how I've always seen them, at least
Ur mad underrated bro
Make mythicals great again
🫡🫡🫡
Great video. Rayquaza is indeed the correct answer.
All the big ones except Arceus should be legendary.
There should just be a new classification at this point. Gods.
pecharunt & deoxys are my favorites
They are already fixing, there is no problem.
Bingus is my favourite mythical pokemon
Bro this vid was so good I watched the whole thing
I really appreciate the kind words! 🫶
time traveling onion 😂
The best kind of onion lol
Wait, Arceus is Mythical? The trio master isn't even in the same classification?
Ye lol
The Theory of Mythicals is a preview of the next Generations.
Ex, Meloetta is to Gen 6 Kalos/France although Ballet originated in Italy
Genesect is both past and future combined that can be alluded with Scarlet/Violet to mention that standard Genesect is Purple while Shiny is Red.
I mean the swords of justice and keldeo are arguably more connected to kalos than melooetta
Interesting discussion 🤔
I think in some instances this could be the case. I will say, I personally don’t think there is any correlation between genesect and gen 9. I think that is probably just a coincidence but it is still a fun thought!
Thanks for the comments 🥳
oh also
mythical pokemon are legendary. they are only mythical becuase they are event pokemon. they are all legendary. saying they are different is wrong
I acknowledge this distinction in the video:)
@paulycrossing cool. mythical pokemon are legendary pokemon that are given through events they are the same thing. what is the different? how they are given is not what makes them different
they are just legendary
nice
Rayquaza and the rest of Hoenn suck. Trash take if you disagree.
Daaang these are some fighting words
lol I respect the opinion though