The dating of these monuments is woefully imprecise. Mainly because they can only do carbon 14 dating on organic matter. Finding bones, charcoal, and other materials only means that at some point "some people" were there at the the C14 date (around 5200BC). However, there is absolutely zero proof that the C14 date people were the original builders. They could have easily been people of an era thousands of years AFTER the original builders, and only rediscovered the ruins and used them for their own purposes. It is a problem that is unaddressed by MANY megalithic sites around the world, including Gobekli Tepi, Stonehenge, etc. There is clearly a difference between the large megalithic stone constructions and the stone walls of smaller more manageable stones, suggesting that two different builders from two different epochs used the site for their own purposes. It has been widely know for centuries that ancient civilizations built upon older ruins. This can easily be the case for sites like Malta and Sardinia. Thus, these megalithic sites are very likely FAR older than the dates given here.
I am drawn to this channel because of one sentence overheard, " There was once an unknown race with long heads or an Alien race found on Malta" that's it at 65 I need to know the answers. These things seem to stick in the brain.
it's an easy subject to study....some ppl made their heads like that....there's a way they do it....not nice....but human bc we have a hole that mends by itself an leaves a marl of healing....but the ones their trying to copy,the gods or aliens don't have the healing mark on their heads...look it up,very interesting
The official age of the temples of Malta and the first high culture with 4000 - 6000 years is unbelievable. The C14 isotope method could never be unequivocally assigned to the stone. That these are the oldest monuments of mankind is since 2000 also no longer credible because of Göbekli Tepe. Archaeoastronomical calculations at the Mnajdra complex in Malta even suggest that the temples are around 21,000 years old. See also "Das Vermächtnis der Tempel von Malta" by AncientMail Publisher.
I have visited only one temple complex on Gozo and it was not the best one but the form of the "rooms" reminded me of African kraals for cattle. Only coincidence of course but next I started to wonder if these complexes could have been made from black Africans who were of course far from home and that's why they gave up the place eventually?? In any case my imagination fails trying to visualize those societies back then.
The goddess figures also have something (of course stereotypical) African but I realize that the gap in time is so huge that it must be just coincidence.
Anne Martin. Astronomically oriented cattle corrals? Your assumptions amount to surreptitious nonsense. Surely the word "temples" implies these were sacred places. The Maltese temples are astronomically oriented. And these temples were NOT built by black Africans.
@@Foxglove963 How can you be sure about that last statement? Because the people there NOW don't appear "Black?" This is an ignorant statement. Not only is Malta closer to AFRICA than it is to Northern Europe, it's even on the same geological PLATE as the African Continent, so technically it IS Africa. Europeans are so myopic, they can't even understand world history without adding some negative racial connotation to the word "African", when we know that Africa had advanced cultures before many other groups.
@@mr.marquez1257 . If you care to read the archaeology, there is not a shred of evidence for your ignorant statement. Indeed, there are many more parallels with the European Neolithic.
The first egyptians admitted that the pyramids were already there when they started inhabiting the area. The same thing was said by the ones who inhabited the monolithic structures in south america. As for the jews building pyramids... they were slaves for mining, building tombs, making jewelry, tending sheep, servants in pharohs house..etc.. no depiction on ANYTHING in egypt about the building of pyramids by the egyptian people or slaves...All these monolithic atructures were found and inhabited. Some were added onto...those are identifiable by archeologists..
Prehistoric doesnt mean stupid.
The dating of these monuments is woefully imprecise. Mainly because they can only do carbon 14 dating on organic matter. Finding bones, charcoal, and other materials only means that at some point "some people" were there at the the C14 date (around 5200BC). However, there is absolutely zero proof that the C14 date people were the original builders. They could have easily been people of an era thousands of years AFTER the original builders, and only rediscovered the ruins and used them for their own purposes. It is a problem that is unaddressed by MANY megalithic sites around the world, including Gobekli Tepi, Stonehenge, etc. There is clearly a difference between the large megalithic stone constructions and the stone walls of smaller more manageable stones, suggesting that two different builders from two different epochs used the site for their own purposes. It has been widely know for centuries that ancient civilizations built upon older ruins. This can easily be the case for sites like Malta and Sardinia. Thus, these megalithic sites are very likely FAR older than the dates given here.
Good video vary interesting thank you.
Thanks for the information, wish if someone show us some information od the ELONGATED SKULLS
I am drawn to this channel because of one sentence overheard, " There was once an unknown race with long heads or an Alien race found on Malta" that's it at 65 I need to know the answers. These things seem to stick in the brain.
it's an easy subject to study....some ppl made their heads like that....there's a way they do it....not nice....but human bc we have a hole that mends by itself an leaves a marl of healing....but the ones their trying to copy,the gods or aliens don't have the healing mark on their heads...look it up,very interesting
Looks like they are stolen, because no one knows where are these elongated skulls
Have a look at some of the lessor known sites on Malta and Gozo here: facebook.com/Templerescuemalta/
The official age of the temples of Malta and the first high culture with 4000 - 6000 years is unbelievable.
The C14 isotope method could never be unequivocally assigned to the stone.
That these are the oldest monuments of mankind is since 2000
also no longer credible because of Göbekli Tepe. Archaeoastronomical calculations
at the Mnajdra complex in Malta even suggest that the temples are around 21,000 years old. See also "Das Vermächtnis der Tempel von Malta" by AncientMail Publisher.
I have visited only one temple complex on Gozo and it was not the best one but the form of the "rooms" reminded me of African kraals for cattle. Only coincidence of course but next I started to wonder if these complexes could have been made from black Africans who were of course far from home and that's why they gave up the place eventually?? In any case my imagination fails trying to visualize those societies back then.
The goddess figures also have something (of course stereotypical) African but I realize that the gap in time is so huge that it must be just coincidence.
Anne Martin. Astronomically oriented cattle corrals? Your assumptions amount to surreptitious nonsense. Surely the word "temples" implies these were sacred places. The Maltese temples are astronomically oriented. And these temples were NOT built by black Africans.
@@Foxglove963 How can you be sure about that last statement? Because the people there NOW don't appear "Black?" This is an ignorant statement. Not only is Malta closer to AFRICA than it is to Northern Europe, it's even on the same geological PLATE as the African Continent, so technically it IS Africa. Europeans are so myopic, they can't even understand world history without adding some negative racial connotation to the word "African", when we know that Africa had advanced cultures before many other groups.
@@mr.marquez1257 . If you care to read the archaeology, there is not a shred of evidence for your ignorant statement. Indeed, there are many more parallels with the European Neolithic.
All ancient monolithic architectural structures are from the first earth age!!
Interesting video but the pronunciation was quite off.
holes for doors???!!!, I dont think so...
Its true im maltese and its real as i have been there in the museum.
they look like giants or titans in flood of Noah - these were made into temples
Ppl didn't build this give me a break
ALL these monoliths are from the first earth age!!!
I believe they are from the era of PANGEA
The first egyptians admitted that the pyramids were already there when they started inhabiting the area. The same thing was said by the ones who inhabited the monolithic structures in south america. As for the jews building pyramids... they were slaves for mining, building tombs, making jewelry, tending sheep, servants in pharohs house..etc.. no depiction on ANYTHING in egypt about the building of pyramids by the egyptian people or slaves...All these monolithic atructures were found and inhabited. Some were added onto...those are identifiable by archeologists..
@@czhappy3195 I believe the pyramids are the oldest buildings on Earth, once there were pyramids allover the world even in the sea.
@@JosephAzzopardiRummiena yep. For sure!
just making things up lol
I see who you are, you are my enemy, my enemy