@@__7000rpm 100mm is way too tight for street. I prefer to use 30mm for street because it allows me to capture the environment. I mainly use the tokina 100mm for macro, portait or food& product photography
Had this lens for over a year now on my Sony A7III. I would agree that it's one of the sharpest lenses I've used, on par with the zeiss 55mm, which is extremely sharp. I also would say that the colour fringing is probably the worst part about it, though it can be negated by stopping down. The autofocus I find to be extremely good. I did notice the focus taking a long time especially when focusing on macro, but that's understandable when you see just how much the glass needs to move to get to the closest focusing distances. As for eye autofocus for portraits, it works amazingly well. I don't remember ever taking a photo of a person that was not either perfectly focused, or on occasion slightly mis-focused, but still usable. And as long as you use it for a portrait lens it also has very quick focusing. Thus, I definitely recommend this lens, as not only can it be used for macro, but it's also an incredible portrait lens. Just mind that fringing, it's very prominent on the highest aperture. Hope this helps, Cheers.
The first gen EF mount Tokina 100 macro is the 1 lens that I regret buying. I didn't end up loving macro as much as I thought I would, but the deal-breaker was the AF motor. It was SOOOOOO SLOOOOOOWWWWWW. Add the hunting it would do and it was basically useless. Throw in a lot of color fringing and I just stopped using the lens except for the 1 or 2 macro shots I'd do a year. I eventually sold it for the Canon 85mm 1.8 and that lens has never left my side. I use other lenses to get close enough for any near macro shots I'd want now. It's a shame to see that this lens really isn't much different than the old version. I really wish I either got the 85 or saved for something like the Canon 100 L. Oh well, live and learn I guess.
own the dslr version，from the review im pretty sure its the same optic design，incredible sharpness，strong purple fringing，outstanding bokeh。and i recommend adapt the nikon mount version，more easy to mannual focus
While I am a Canon user and may have to try the EF version, that bokeh really is beautiful. I will give them that! Just shoot at F5.6 :) Color fringing is easy to get rid of in Photoshop anyway. Just duplicate the image, add a blur filter, and switch the blend mode to color. Invert the mask and paint over just the CA for a more precise edit. But you really don't have to worry too much about that unless you're going to print your images.
The Sigma Macro 105mm f2.8 EX DG OS HSM seems to be a good alternative for those who don't have a mirrorless camera, it's an older lens but it's still very popular.
Hi Chris. Thanks for the great review. Seeing as you have reviewed this one and the Samyang offering of the same lens, how do you compare the two? I got the impression that the Samyang didn't breath when focusing, and while it was totally manual, who cares! Thanks
Wow what a wonderful performance! Considering it's price it really makes me wonder if it can beat the Minolta 100 f2.8 macro which I remember ken rockwell once said is the sharpest lens he has ever tested,though many new age macro lenses were not made that time. I wish we could see...some of those glorious Minolta lenses being reviewed by you Chris! I do love it how you always put an extra effort testing all lenses on apsc bodies also... Special thanks from an apsc owner,Keep up the great job!
f/32 is rare with recent new macro lenses. Before with Sony a-mount macro lenses or Nikon F mount macro lenses the f/32 was common but not any more. The Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 has minimum f/22 like most other new macro lenses. With macro photography the depth of field is very narrow even with f/16 or f/22. There is the focus stacking post digital method but for me the f/32 is a better old school choice. Of course at f/32 the diffraction is enormous but the results isn't so bad.
That focus motor's noise is adorably similar to a comedy robot arm sound. I'm not hating on it, though. I'm sure that's not a big deal for those who enjoy using it :-)
Will you be reviewing the new Tokina ATX-I 100mm F2.8 Macro?
Před 4 lety
Thank you for the review. That purple fringing was actually quite nice and looked artistic when you captured ink on paper. Because most black inks have a purple tone on paper when you look close enough. I wish they made this for L-Mount, Panasonic S1. Currently looking for some macro lenses for the system and quite liked the photos of Tokina.
anyone have any experience with this lens on the A7 RIV? The Tokina 80mm 1.8 on my R IV would cause the camera to reboot regularly. No firmware update for it to fix that. Wondering if this macro lens works perfectly with the R IV. thanks
Can you please so a review on the cannon 90mm ts-e macro adapted onto your a7r2 ive got one that i use everyday for product and I absolutely love it the glass is way bigger than regular macro lenses because you need that room for tilting and shifting. So i think it would be such an interesting review !! Reach out:)
Chris - is there any chance you could review the new Tamron 28-200mm F2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony E-mount? It's a really interesting proposition as an all-purpose superzoom for travel photography - So I'm sure a lot of your viewers would like to see it put through its paces.
AF is not so important for me when taking macro shots, as I mostly leave my older Tokina 100mm f2.8 in manual focus, and just move closer in or further away to focus. It has that nice push pull AF/MF clutch too (for the odd distance shot); super sharp lens! I'm guessing this is the same optical design in a different body?
Well Tokina's own website lists the same optical formula, so there's a fair chance it might be. I suppose if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Kind of says something that an optical design that old (2006, I think?) works so well on a 42MP camera, though.
Sony 90mm is one of the sharpest lenses in the world. It has its own image stabilization which works along with cameras giving you a tack sharp image. Comparing Tokina, Tamron Sigma, etc is just meaningless.
I have the old tokina 100mm macro for ef mount. It’s a great lens but the motor sounds the same as this new one and is just as slow to focus. Tokina needs new focusing motors ASAP. Way too slow for any lens in 2020.
Which one is sharper, the Tokina, Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art or Laowa 85mm f/5.6? I’m currently shopping for a macro lens for sony FE for close up product photography. Lens length of any where from 50mm to 100mm should work fine for me and though good AF would be nice I would go for a manual lens if it was sharper. The biggest issue for me is price, I need something around $500. Any suggestions?
When testing the sharpness, why do you only show the center of the test map on the largest aperture, and then show all other apertures in the corners? It is the center that is most interesting. And you should get a better test map. When you say it looks sharp, it doesn't look like it. Compare with the picture on the banknote at the beginning which looked much sharper. Test the map you are using does not have enough resolution. It looks like you printed it with a cheap inkjet printer. There must be those of higher quality. It would make your videos more professional. And above all. When you take the center of the picture, show all the apertures, at least some. Just showing up on the biggest aperture and then going straight to the corners is no good. It is usually the center that is most interesting
If I don't go back to looking at the center, that's for a simple reason - it doesn't get any sharper. And FYI, the test chart is an approx 100mp image printed at very high resolution, on a flat sheet of metal, at great expense - it doesn't get any better than that. You need to remember that I'm zooming in quite far to show you the resolution, there.
@@christopherfrost It really doesn't look that way. I have seen numerous tests where the test map looks much sharper. Same with the pictures in the background, they have low contrast and poor sharpness, at least on full HD TV. The photo you took on the banknote looked much sharper
The legendary 100mm tokina! It's my favorite lens
Certainly looks like a fun and respectable lens to use :-)
Curious if you use it for anything other than a macro/portrait lens? Say street photography?
@@__7000rpm 100mm is way too tight for street. I prefer to use 30mm for street because it allows me to capture the environment. I mainly use the tokina 100mm for macro, portait or food& product photography
@@Archontasil Thank you!
“My tests are designed to get the worst out of the lenses that have the misfortune to cross my path” 👌🏻👍🏻 slick sentence framing
I work with the older Tokina 100mm 2.8 macro for Nikon, amazing lens. Amazing quality.
Haven't sold me it . Keep the original
Thanks again Christopher, interesting to see such a legendary lens getting a makeover.
Years later and they STILL haven't fixed how terribly noisy this lens is XD
Wow, its for taking pictures LOL
@@richb7682 And if you're taking pictures of bugs, which macro photographers do, sound matters :)
@@praxis-cat870 manual focus might help
A bug isn't going to flinch because of a noisy lens 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
almost one review every day. Thank you Chris, I would appreciate if you can review Zeiss 50mm Milvus f 1,4
Had this lens for over a year now on my Sony A7III.
I would agree that it's one of the sharpest lenses I've used, on par with the zeiss 55mm, which is extremely sharp. I also would say that the colour fringing is probably the worst part about it, though it can be negated by stopping down.
The autofocus I find to be extremely good. I did notice the focus taking a long time especially when focusing on macro, but that's understandable when you see just how much the glass needs to move to get to the closest focusing distances. As for eye autofocus for portraits, it works amazingly well. I don't remember ever taking a photo of a person that was not either perfectly focused, or on occasion slightly mis-focused, but still usable. And as long as you use it for a portrait lens it also has very quick focusing.
Thus, I definitely recommend this lens, as not only can it be used for macro, but it's also an incredible portrait lens. Just mind that fringing, it's very prominent on the highest aperture.
Hope this helps,
Cheers.
Tokina have always made decent glass, their ATX range was highly regarded. However that AF system doesn't seem anywhere near top flight. 😎😎😎
Finally, tokina firin review
Awesome
Honestly, I would get the 70mm Sigma Art lens even if the focal length is shorter. It's that much better.
you'll need to have a 100mm macro shoot out soon with the ones you tested
The first gen EF mount Tokina 100 macro is the 1 lens that I regret buying. I didn't end up loving macro as much as I thought I would, but the deal-breaker was the AF motor. It was SOOOOOO SLOOOOOOWWWWWW. Add the hunting it would do and it was basically useless. Throw in a lot of color fringing and I just stopped using the lens except for the 1 or 2 macro shots I'd do a year. I eventually sold it for the Canon 85mm 1.8 and that lens has never left my side. I use other lenses to get close enough for any near macro shots I'd want now.
It's a shame to see that this lens really isn't much different than the old version. I really wish I either got the 85 or saved for something like the Canon 100 L. Oh well, live and learn I guess.
I feel like a focus limiter would have benefitted this lens quite substancially.
Seriously. What the heck Tokina.
Hi Christopher, I got a few Tokina lenses. They are pretty good. No macrolens though. Thank you sharing this informative video.
own the dslr version，from the review im pretty sure its the same optic design，incredible sharpness，strong purple fringing，outstanding bokeh。and i recommend adapt the nikon mount version，more easy to mannual focus
While I am a Canon user and may have to try the EF version, that bokeh really is beautiful. I will give them that! Just shoot at F5.6 :) Color fringing is easy to get rid of in Photoshop anyway. Just duplicate the image, add a blur filter, and switch the blend mode to color. Invert the mask and paint over just the CA for a more precise edit. But you really don't have to worry too much about that unless you're going to print your images.
Will see how this compares to the Canon RF 85/2 IS when both are available in terms of price wise.Thanks for the review Christopher!
I’m happy with my Laowa 100mm f2.8
Waiting for the review of the Tokina ATX-i 100mm Macro
Which is better sigma or this
the rear rubber ring just blows me away. What the hell?
The Sigma Macro 105mm f2.8 EX DG OS HSM seems to be a good alternative for those who don't have a mirrorless camera, it's an older lens but it's still very popular.
That works great on mirrorless as well...
Hi Chris. Thanks for the great review. Seeing as you have reviewed this one and the Samyang offering of the same lens, how do you compare the two? I got the impression that the Samyang didn't breath when focusing, and while it was totally manual, who cares!
Thanks
Wow what a wonderful performance! Considering it's price it really makes me wonder if it can beat the Minolta 100 f2.8 macro which I remember ken rockwell once said is the sharpest lens he has ever tested,though many new age macro lenses were not made that time.
I wish we could see...some of those glorious Minolta lenses being reviewed by you Chris!
I do love it how you always put an extra effort testing all lenses on apsc bodies also... Special thanks from an apsc owner,Keep up the great job!
f/32 is rare with recent new macro lenses. Before with Sony a-mount macro lenses or Nikon F mount macro lenses the f/32 was common but not any more.
The Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 has minimum f/22 like most other new macro lenses.
With macro photography the depth of field is very narrow even with f/16 or f/22. There is the focus stacking post digital method but for me the f/32 is a better old school choice. Of course at f/32 the diffraction is enormous but the results isn't so bad.
That focus motor's noise is adorably similar to a comedy robot arm sound. I'm not hating on it, though. I'm sure that's not a big deal for those who enjoy using it :-)
Loved the review, quick question.. Which would recommend this or the tokina atx I 100 2.8 on a nikon z7 ?☺️
Please bring review of tokina 100mm atx-i f2.8
When it becomes available, test Tamron's 28-200mm F/2.8-5.6mm Super Zoom For Sony Full Frame Mirrorless.
Love mine!
well, I would prefer Sigma 70 ART marcro in EF mount, which can also use Canon 2X teleconverter
Will you be reviewing the new Tokina ATX-I 100mm F2.8 Macro?
Thank you for the review. That purple fringing was actually quite nice and looked artistic when you captured ink on paper. Because most black inks have a purple tone on paper when you look close enough. I wish they made this for L-Mount, Panasonic S1. Currently looking for some macro lenses for the system and quite liked the photos of Tokina.
anyone have any experience with this lens on the A7 RIV? The Tokina 80mm 1.8 on my R IV would cause the camera to reboot regularly. No firmware update for it to fix that. Wondering if this macro lens works perfectly with the R IV. thanks
Can you please so a review on the cannon 90mm ts-e macro adapted onto your a7r2 ive got one that i use everyday for product and I absolutely love it the glass is way bigger than regular macro lenses because you need that room for tilting and shifting. So i think it would be such an interesting review !! Reach out:)
Maybe one day :-)
That focusing motor doing AF and by-wire MF sounds like an RC motor or some cheap crank-up toy car....
that zoom behavior is very reminiscent of the 70 mm sigma macro lens ...
I want to thank you for saving me thousands of dollars. Every time you review a lens I end up deleting it from my cart.
Do You have tokina atx-i 100mm review? Couldnt find manually scrolling or i missed it :/
Chris - is there any chance you could review the new Tamron 28-200mm F2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony E-mount? It's a really interesting proposition as an all-purpose superzoom for travel photography - So I'm sure a lot of your viewers would like to see it put through its paces.
Eventually, yes, I will :-)
Hi what would you recommend tokina 100mm f.2.8 or Samyang 100mm f2.8?
Anyone have any ideas on the advantages this would have over the Sony SEL30M35 30mm f/3.5?
reccomend for macro beauty work?
wow that focus motor is horrendous to say the least!
AF is not so important for me when taking macro shots, as I mostly leave my older Tokina 100mm f2.8 in manual focus, and just move closer in or further away to focus. It has that nice push pull AF/MF clutch too (for the odd distance shot); super sharp lens!
I'm guessing this is the same optical design in a different body?
Well Tokina's own website lists the same optical formula, so there's a fair chance it might be. I suppose if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Kind of says something that an optical design that old (2006, I think?) works so well on a 42MP camera, though.
Your next review please: Venus Optics Laowa 65mm f/2.8 Ultra Macro for Canon EF-M ... thank you!
I've already tested it on Sony :-)
Christopher Frost Photography I guess too late for me. I wanted to know how good the ef-m version was maybe on your m6 ii
@@snowwalker9999 It should be excellent, judging by the Sony results
Still waiting for Sigma 150mm OS HSM "Art" remake ....
wanna try the irix 150mm makro ? I would even lend it to you
I absolutely love the irix 150mm. The focus throw is perfection.
Tokina 100mm f/2.8 atx-i or Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro 'Art'?📸
Probably the Sigma lens
Sony 90mm macro vs Tamron 90mm macro(with adapter) vs Tokina 100mm macro
Which one is recommended?
Sony 90mm is one of the sharpest lenses in the world. It has its own image stabilization which works along with cameras giving you a tack sharp image. Comparing Tokina, Tamron Sigma, etc is just meaningless.
@@hemalkarambelkar9638 You're right. I bought Sony 90 macro two months ago, and I'm satisfied with its image quality, sharpness.
I have the old tokina 100mm macro for ef mount. It’s a great lens but the motor sounds the same as this new one and is just as slow to focus. Tokina needs new focusing motors ASAP. Way too slow for any lens in 2020.
what do you think about the older Tokina 100mm 2.8 ?
is it sharp as Firin ?
the optic is the same ，just design different
@@powerlurker thank you for imformation.
Next one Fujifilm 80mm macro.
What camera do you use?
Watch the video, or read the description, and you'll find out
What is the second ring for ?
Nothing
@@christopherfrost Ah.
They could have done something like on the RF lenses with a custom function on the ring :/
Which one is sharper, the Tokina, Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art or Laowa 85mm f/5.6? I’m currently shopping for a macro lens for sony FE for close up product photography. Lens length of any where from 50mm to 100mm should work fine for me and though good AF would be nice I would go for a manual lens if it was sharper. The biggest issue for me is price, I need something around $500. Any suggestions?
Crystal Pepsi?!? Oh dear.
Tokina is still bad with fringing .... very bad control ..
You should try out the fuji 80 2.8 it's much sharper than Sony's 90
No, it's not, but it's still good
@@christopherfrost check out the review on lens tip and compare mtf with sony's 90. you might be suprised!
Isn't Firin the little bald guy from Dragonball? :-)
Krillin
I could fit 3 of my 120mm f2.8 macro lenses in that one 😂🤣
That fringing. Ouch.
When testing the sharpness, why do you only show the center of the test map on the largest aperture, and then show all other apertures in the corners? It is the center that is most interesting. And you should get a better test map. When you say it looks sharp, it doesn't look like it. Compare with the picture on the banknote at the beginning which looked much sharper. Test the map you are using does not have enough resolution. It looks like you printed it with a cheap inkjet printer. There must be those of higher quality. It would make your videos more professional. And above all. When you take the center of the picture, show all the apertures, at least some. Just showing up on the biggest aperture and then going straight to the corners is no good. It is usually the center that is most interesting
If I don't go back to looking at the center, that's for a simple reason - it doesn't get any sharper. And FYI, the test chart is an approx 100mp image printed at very high resolution, on a flat sheet of metal, at great expense - it doesn't get any better than that. You need to remember that I'm zooming in quite far to show you the resolution, there.
@@christopherfrost It really doesn't look that way. I have seen numerous tests where the test map looks much sharper. Same with the pictures in the background, they have low contrast and poor sharpness, at least on full HD TV. The photo you took on the banknote looked much sharper
Trust me on this one (or don't, it's up to you :-)