FE 7 Devourer of Time Patch - Ace vs Zephiel

This is the first battle against Zephiel in the Dragon's Gate in Flyingace24's Devourer of Time patch. It is pretty well made imo. I had great fun playing this during my mid-sem exam time period (where I should have been studying/cramming lol).
I noticed about maybe 5 odd things during my playthrough, but only 2 of them bothered me. One was the wrong sprite being used for Zephiel's portrait here, although in the final chapter, the correct one was used lol. The second was the better Marle portrait not being used when using her. The one that was edited from Ursula's original portrait. It was used during the story conversations, but not during battle. But besides that, the patch/hack was pretty well made.
Some little things I noticed here in this chapter:
1. Zephiel's portrait for the mug shot (I think its called) is not right. Its Darin haha
2. I thought Exaccus was a sword, not a lance.
3. This fight seems so much like the Black Knight Battle in FE 9.
- 5 uses on Ragnell = 5 turns to kill? (less actually lol)
- Both main characters are using their respective pwnage weapons.
- Lord vs an upgraded General
- Your stats will not beat his (unless you arena-abused, which I didn't)
- The hit rates lol. A bit of luck is involved
- He regens as if he has the Renewal Skill!
- Sarah = Mist lol
I forgot to show this, but Ragnell gives +5 str, +5 skill, +10 def. Nowhere near matching the bonuses given by the Exaccus. I wish he could have implemented the King Class' Animation here. It would have been more nostalgic and awesome =D
For those who want to try out the patch:
forums.grandbel...

[@WednesdayMan]

whoever made this hack did 1 major gameplay wise thing wrong.
the Exaccus has a weapon triangle advantage over the ragnell.

[@Heipmaster]

It's because he made it a lance weapon because back then, they didn't know how to put in the FE8 sword general animation into the game. That's my guess anyway

[@Mister_Larrold]

But... it's not Zeph's real animation.

[@Rampagingbrick5]

read the description ...

[@Heipmaster]

Unfortunately =(
But its not my hack, so I can't do anything about it.

[@Sindgoemon]

i can tell this is a definate hack

[@Sindgoemon]

i did that's why i put that