CoNsErVaTiVes ArE MoRe eXTrEmE - DEBUNKED
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- Join the Debunkers as they return after a year long Hiatus to explain to Carlos Maza how incorrect he is once again!
Sauces:
www.investors....
www.presidency...
www.govinfo.go...
“In 2013 they actually shut the government down” “The real tragedy was that they opened it back up again”
My fucking sides lmao
Or that it wasn't really shut down.
It happened under Clinton too, but he forgot that part. That's when him and Monica...
Do these cartoon billionaires (and you all) not realise it’s the government that allows them to maintain private property? How are you going to claim ownership of a factory you don’t work at without the threat of force?
It was shut down twice under Trump over not wanting to fund the wall, instead of you know, a completely new healthcare system. Maza left that part ofcourse
Couldn’t agree more.
Trump said “end the EPA intrusion into your lives” not ending the administration 🙄
Oh the framing...
You noticed that too, huh?
Just like how he was calling illegals, specifically gang members, are rapist, NOT Mexicans.
@@howardbaxter2514 if y0u 100k c10se1y, every sing1e thing "they" c1aimed trump said that 1efties c0mp1ained ab0ut was a deceptive1y framed qu0te
Misquoting Trump was the red pill for me. I'd probably still consider myself a centrist, but man did I learn a lot once I learned who to not listen to.
Yeah, thats called a WHIPSAW
Reminds me of the Babylon Bee headline:
“Man in boat drifting to the left wondering why shore is drifting to the right.”
The Babylon Bee treads this blurred line between satire and reality.
@@VinnyMartello the satire of today becomes the prophecy of tomorrow
-internet guy on the onion
@@charlieniven6558 Too bad the Onion is trash now
@@Xeno_Solarus and it's still more accurate than CNN
The Onion hasn’t uploaded in like 4 years
"They...shut the government down."
"The real shame is that they opened it up again!"
By far, one of the best FreedomToons jokes.
That was a joke?
Joke?
no joke
Which really exempt the level of intelligence that freedom toon fans are operating at 😂
@@KieraQ0323
joke - a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline.
It is, objectively, a joke.
I love that the doctor is just ben Shapiro’s wife but the character is just ben Shapiro with lip stick
His wife is a doctor, you know?
I heard somewhere that Ben Shapiro's wife's husband is Ben Shapiro.
Legend has it, ben shapiro's wife is a doctor
Ben Shapiro's wife is a doctor? That's news to me. He's never mentioned it before
@@RetroRobotRadio Really???
"There's a rational middle ground between an automatic path to citizenship and a program of mass deportation."
Trump said during his campaign that he wouldn't mind have a door on the wall so people could come into the country legally. He even said he wanted more people than ever immigrating, but that he wants it to be legal. How is trying to find compromise between no immigration and open borders any different than that? If anything, Trump was giving more compromise in his rhetoric.
Because "Orange Man Bad!." That and calling anyone that disagrees with them a racist is all they have.
We're at the point where the idea of expecting people to follow the law even when entering the country is a major political division. The law and government is there to protect its citizens first, not hopeful immigrants. When you prioritize people outside of the country over your own citizens you have failed as a government.
These people grew up never being told "no". In their mind, if someone wants something, as long as you have the same politics that they do, then you should get it without question and without resistance.
Actually he made it a lot harder to become a citizen legally, apparently, and that's what most people actually have a problem with
@@lucassism6726 OPs point is that from a rhetoric standpoint he was very compromising between the two political stances.
Merrick Garland the eternal centrist.
Also Merrick Garland on Antifa:
"It is not terrorism if you conduct the activity at night."
no way he actually said that XD
Did he fr say that lmfao 🤣
it went more like this: uuuh uuh uh ahh uuhhh i dont uuuh thinkk uuuhh uuhh eehh that it was uuuh an act of terrorism uuuh since uh it was at uh night
Did he actually say that?
@Imperial Bricks more or less. He said it only counts if it’s disrupting a “democratic process” that’s currently in progress
“gay atheist immigrant” who leaves out that his mother and stepfather are multi millionaires who fund his lifestyle
Fr
That explains so much of his complete lack of perspective. He's LITERALLY never lived outside of his waspy, wealthy bubble.
real
"It's not normal for the Senate to block the President's Supreme Court nomination..." Except for the fact that the Senate blocks the Supreme Court nomination in 90% of cases in which the President is from a different party than the one that controls the Senate. Yep, totally unusual to follow the trend that happens 90% of the time.
its not normal for congress to simply withold voting whatsoever, but voting to decline a nomination is normal and intended in the constitution*
@@thonk7611 yes it is normal since 1993 using the "biden rule(nickname after the person that write it)" that senate can simply withhold voting if the white house and senate has different controlling sides(before that it was normal for the senate with different side just to the way you said but it changed to the new normal in 1993. take a wild guess at who started it.
@Dante Alighieri or Bork.
They should hold a vote, but per the intended purpose of the Senate vote, in this hypothetical every person in the Senate should vote against anyone Hilary nominates who they feel will not faithfully guard the Constitution. It is not normal to pick people that'll legislate from the bench.
why would norms affect prudence/ethics/efficacy? i dont get it.
I love how he plays "gay athiest latino from an immigrant family" cards all the time, but never mentions how both his parents are millionaires.
Wait, really?
@@Don_Von ya his family is rich
@@Don_Von His family is rich, he lives in one of their 4.8 million dollar mansions. Which was found out because he was calling out people for living in Luxury mansions, doxxing them, and using their wealth to invalidate their points.
Well... a republican journalist found out where he lives, and who his parents are, and did the same thing. Called him out for living in luxury, being part of the 1% and he went and cried to youtube / facebook etc and got the journalist banned. Then continued to dox them, and try to ruin their lives.
Guy is a champagne socialist.
@@HauntingSpectre he’s a big ole man baby who’s always gotten what he wanted because his parents probably never actually raised him other then the maids
Shows what legal immigrants can do when illegals don't take their spot
"Researchers gave them a score based on how extreme or moderate they were"
In other words, this entire scale is based on subjective reasoning and is totally worthless.
Exactly. It's quite a dangerous double edged sword; there is no barometer to measure how extreme social ideologies have became. We need to measure this by results and actions, such as rioting, discrimination, segregation, etc. All of which the left are using ad nauseam. 10 years ago I would say I was a proud liberal, but as the goal posts have consistently changed, I might as well be a GOP flag flying cowboy in places like Seattle or LA, where I work.
"Researchers" always means "my far leftist buddies."
Ah yes, 'history is written by leftists' (including democrats er liberals, despite them being extremely different). I think one of three things happened; the leftists (moved farther left to address rightist moving farther right, the rightists moved farther right, or each side percieves a change, possibly partly causing the shift on both sides. I don't think this is a 'leftists bad' thing, but I think we're all stupid.
Also @DrewBias_95 out here actually sounding like a nazi goddamn u ight bro?
I do feel democrats are being forced into a more business friendly old republican model due to corporations.
Basically, democrats try to pass a bill that partly effects corporations via better worker conditions, a higher wage (pulling an amazon), etc, corporations threaten to cut funds from them (they also fund repubs to get them to release restrictions or do the same thing), the bill gets cutback massively to meet corporate demands whilst keeping their voters happy, corporations are pleased and leave.
By the way, I'm not a Democrat nor a repub. I do thing the democratic system is flawed, not to any ideology but to the demands of corporations, and I do think stock buybacks and the abolition of the gold standard have lowered the real economy whilst the economy prospers, also contributing to corporations.
I don't see why Republicans fight so hard to get their way when democrats, despite having farther leftist thought (apparently, I see rightists and leftists making that same argument against eachother as dumb), end up mimicking the actions of Republicans in the Teddy Roosevelt era than any form of leftist policy.
Fun fact: political ideology is unrelated to age (except bottom left anarchists if you squint alot)
@@russinbuston4348 The right moved further right on what exactly, leftoid?
I assume you're saying the right moved socially right, which is absurd. You guys would be correct if you were talking about the right moving economically further right.
Gay marriage? They're all fine with it now. Christian evangelical nonsense? They're fine them doing them now and other people can do what they want too.
Are you talking about the warmongering the right used to call for? Because it was the left becoming war apologists and the right becoming anti-war that pushed me over to this side.
How about mindless trust in authorities that they loved pushing almost my entire life? Nope. Distrustful of the state, the intelligence apparatus, the billionaire elites, the military-industrial complex, warpig press, and the lying corporations too.
And they're moving further in this direction too. Have you seen a right winger (who isn't a cop) with one of those cringe Blue Line flags the past couple years? Nope.
Here's the truth of the matter, leftist. This is a party flip. The left loves the corporations, the state, the war machine, and trusts the media/government/intel apparatus/war machine implicitly.
I mean, we're literally watching the workers of the world unite in REAL TIME and what does the 'left' do? It gasps, affronted that the poors would dare, would very dare to forget their place in society.
And then they demand their king call in the military to deal with the 'insurrectionist' peasant uprising.
If this is the French Revolution then it's the left who have shot so far off to the right, so fast that martians think they're taking fire.
@@russinbuston4348 Nazi? I hate socialism. I don't like "measuring" anything, I was speaking within the context of the "research" mentioned, and against modern leftist ideals like hiring based on race, segregating those groups professionally or for reasons like education, etc. If anything it's the opposite of Nazi politics or authoritarianism. But that's okay, people defending these ideologies use the new other n word all the time to condemn what they disagree with. They don't teach about the Russian leftist authoritarianism that killed about 20 to 50 million people last century for this reason. Because the institutional interests of the education system in America (and the west, and large parts of western Europe) don't align with the truth. I don't affiliate with any party either, and yes, the right are evil in a lot of ways... But ,the left are just as bad, and the problem is, they are almost never held accountable and people pretend like they're ignorant to it because of all the propaganda. If anything, the "right" has gone more left, and the "left" has also gone more left. Socially. But this has created two groups that are now *both* something different. (Radical progressives, and people on the right who just dgaf anymore because they have no where to turn nor any sort of outlet; they've been forced into being moderate and no one listens to moderates.) Don't let the way I speak confuse you, I just don't give a shit about what anyone says is politically correct. I'm extremely moderate and despise both far ends of the spectrum.
"And they blocked the bill without knowing what was in the bill"
I wonder if that was worse than voting for the bill without knowing what was in the bill?
Knowing someone booted the idea of passing a new law right out of pocket without bothering to humor it's bullshit is a pretty great way get me to vote for them.
Pelosi: We have to pass it to know what's in it!
Nope. Both are equally fucked.
Fuck whataboutism.
Edit: However, let's not pretend that that wasn't the intent. When you hand someone 1200 pages of legalese, and tell them to vote pass or fail by end of next day, they aren't doing that in good faith.
sounds efficient. I wouldn't need to read a bill written by a democrat either
At least with the former, nothing changes
"Reagan raised taxes 11 times during his administration", also Michael Jordan missed 16,402 shots over his career. Therefore Ronald Reagan loved high taxes and Michael Jordan was a terrible basketball player.
Lmao
counter strike
Seems legit
Makes perfect sense to me. Just imagine how terrible Shaq was if you look at how many free throws he missed. 😅
11 cartel members arrested.
All Latinos work for the cartel
So if I understand Democrat’s plan in 2021: “everything we are guilty of, just let our media outlets say it’s the republicans that are guilty” ??? Hmm, sounds like the same tactics that my kids use on each other
It sounds like Angelica from the old Nickelodeon classic, 'Rugrats'. "THE BABIES DID IT!"
It is actually in the Leftist book Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky
politics in a nutshell
The Democrat's entire platform seems to be based on "confession through projection". So many of the things they hyperventilated Trump was going to do (but never did), they are now rushing to do. (Police state, the Constitution as butt-wipe, weaponizing the government against political "enemies" and outsourcing bullying and banning to social media).
The problem is they've gone fully far-Left demented to the point where their confessions through projection are ludicrously blatant (like Molly Ball's Time Magazine article) and they are fully expecting the media outlets to mislead the gullible sheeple into letting the government seize even MORE power over your personal life.
I just got off another thread where a Leftist was totally asserting that numerous courts found "no evidence" of voter fraud.
They always have.
This Maza guy is unbelievable. It’s like he’s punching you in the face while screaming “stop punching me in the face, you bigot!”
Crybullies.
@G Soap Men, no longer needed, for now anyway.
The communist always cries out in pain as he strikes you.
@G Soap you could literally clank his jaw one time then he's out on a coma for a week.
@@-HutchMansell I'm not a psycho or anything but man it would be so easy and debatably fun to throw him around. He weighs like 120 lbs I bet.
“The point you seem to be missing-oh look at that, he’s a Democrat”
“How objective”
😂
i’m always the racist until i say that “my dad is the first generation born in america and my mom is a active tribal member.” then they immediately 360 and try to speak for me.
Yeah if you're white and disagree with them it's "Shut up racist! Why do you hate minorities?!" but if you're a minority it's "You're just not smart enough to realize I'm helping you!"
@john lewis Don't you find that offensive and getting old?
Annoying isn't it.
Yuuuup just pat them on the head & be sure to stock up on your hard 🍬
@@m_d1905 what the extremists on the left that say they “speak for me”? i do find that offensive and lack luster, they say they speak for oppressed minorities but they are doing exactly what the colonists did just this time we aren’t getting financial gain from trades we are just being called to stupid to understand.
Vox's argument in a nutshell: "The only way another human can become further away from me is if I stand still and they walk away"
NO I SAID END ABORTION WHY CANT YOU HEAR ME
*this is entirely their strategy*
Doesn't politics inevitably go leftwards? Look at human history. Our trajectory over literally thousands of years has been stereotypical "left" wards.
@@pseudonymousbeing987
could you elaborate, your point of view?
because what left mean seem to change so fast i am not sure what you mean.
IF it is in relation to conservatism, of course in the end it's the only posiibility by definition, because the right is, "it is working right now don't change too much", while the left is "i think changing that and that, and that and apply those 'untested ideas' will somehow make it work better".
----'better' is the ennemy of 'good'----
IF it is for the removal of responsability, defenetly yes, because weaker men don't want as much responsabilities, and as technologie made life easier, it removed some of the pressure to stive forward, therefor mechanicly men became weaker,
i admit that i am probably mentaly weaker(will to fight, not computing power) then the average men in 1914, and i think that most people are.
but at some point if nobody want responsability and IA are not ready to take care of them yet, if they just keep going further left then society will colapse , creating harder time, creating strong men, who will want responsability, and the circle will start again from the beginning.
dictator(one man all responsability)>>>>>concil(multiple people)>>>democracy(everyone)>>>>COLLAPSE>>>>dictatorship
in case of a military takover, we just skip the collapsed state
@@pseudonymousbeing987
Only because left-right is arbitrary, and can be redefined to whatever someone wants.
Left-communism to Right-fascism: no.
Left-regulations to Right-liberty: no.
Left-change to Right-status quo: yes, but only because it's so broad and also contradictory.
Everything inevitably changes, so this lacks proper direction and goals to use as a metric.
Democracy, Monarchy, Dictatorship, High authority, and low authority have all been *left wing* at some point or another, so it's not a good measurement.
Even if it was true and the left ideas were consistent, there's still the issue of going too far.
You're body needs water, but too much water will cause water toxemia.
@@Halowarrior187 I'm appealing to the majority. I think almost every last person you pick of the street will agree that humanity as a whole over time appears to tend to the left in terms of politics. Whatever it is most people take that as, they seem to agree with the statement.
The gay dude in this video was laughed off the internet years ago.
He described himself as queer, atheist, hippie; but left off massively wealthy.
Apparently he's into that, 'cause here he is again.
@@DG-mk7kd His family is crazy rich
Careful we might get another ad-pocalypse
What a homosexual, he doesn't sound happy if he has to have so many descriptors to describe himself.
“In 2013, they shut the government down”
“The real tragedy was that they opened it back up again”
Love him or hate him, he’s spitting straight fax
this
So true
To somebody who’s stupid sure.
None of you all have been in the military, I assume. Those shutdowns cause havoc and cut our tiny paychecks.
Loved the hot air balloon analogy
Yeah that was a great analogy. To make it perfect you should have had the debunkers slowly sinking in something.
Especially because leftists are full of hot air ;)
In short: The left has moved so far left that they call centrists “far right” now.
@@j.9970 They call progressives who aren't far enough left "far right" now.
me too - I never thought of it this way but it makes perfect sense
"Freedom of speech is a fascist talking point"
I have literally heard this from multiple "liberals". Conversation with such people is meaningless.
And by “liberals” we mean _“illiberal leftists that hate liberalism, liberal ideas, and liberal values”._
agreed. speaking to them is a waste of your time and theirs. it's like trying to convince the schizophrenic on the corner that martians ARENT communicating to him through his cigarette. both are 100% immune to reason.
because they are already the fascists they will just get violent. due to the chimpanzee level of rationalization. they can't comprehend it so they get angry and try to remove it from their territory. lacking the curves and folds of a true human brain, some may be correct and labeling them "Smooth Brains" they'll just never evolve. lol
Wow what the actual hell is the world coming to
Wow that’s reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
..Tarded
"Have you ever seen someone's soul whither away midsentence?"
Not until Biden started campaigning
Assuming he ever had a soul to begin with.
@@Vigriff Probably with the devil tbh
@@vigilantthewolf8996 He campaigned?
@@Valkarilk i think he did that one day
till 9 am
@@Valkarilk Oh shiiiiii- You right
"Conservatives look more extreme because the left wing actually is more extreme, yet cannot see how far they have gone into tyranny and State control in comparison to where the left wing was even just 20 years ago."
Fixed that for you.
It was radicals who overthrown and established tyranny and state control, not conservatives, they advocated for the opposite, less state controls and regulations
I read that in the Debunkers voice
Hell 20 more like 10
John F Kennedy would be considered a right wing extremist today.
He actually lowered taxes and reduced the size of government during his short time in office.
As a leftist these people are FUCKING DISAPPOINTING! WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO WORKER’S RIGHTS!?
I hate this talking point. The party that wants to cancel everyone is somehow less extreme?
Yeah, it's pretty clear that they don't believe a godfuckin' thing they say.
Yea
hey, its not liberals who cancel, it's autists, take it from me, an actual liberal
Listen we all ain’t like that
@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ as a centrist that is not true, the number is way less, there are stupid people on the left who are extreme, but not 95%
"CoNsErVaTiVes ArE MoRe eXTrEmE" Said the people trying to defund the police.
And then complaining about how the police aren't around to protect them in the states where they've been successfully defunded.
The same people have OPENLY stated how they would ban religion and religious freedom.
Shh. Everyone knows getting rid of the police while also banning law-abiding citizens from owning guns is best way to keep people safe. As soon as the bad people see that no one has any way to protect themselves, they'll realize they were wrong and stop doing bad stuff.
@@benjaminkesler5245 Worked for Venezuela
Edit: For reference this is sarcasm
@@Lord_Numpty and then x2 they don't want police to be militarized except they want police to be better
"I'm a queer, tree-hugging atheist with immigrant parents." - Carlos Maza. How strange he didn't mention growing up in the height of luxury in his bona fides.
And his point about the filibuster has aged very well; the 4 years of Trump saw the Dems use the filibuster more than everyone else in the history of our government combined.
I really do like these guys videos.
Honestly while he didnt mention it, you can infer it because no one who has ever been beat up would call themselves a "queer, tree-hugging atheist with immigrant parents"
@@azia5051 What do you know about politics or history roblox picture?
Maza and his ilk don’t care what we have to say, period! But we are the authoritarians….
When he says that he destroys all his credibility because he’s admitting how biased he is.
"Garland is objectively a centrist" That aged like milk.
Still aged better than the gallons of man milk curdling in Carlos' digestive tract.
Mmmm cheese
I wish he still was
Laughed hard at this:
"Political scientists have a word for this..."
"Complete Nonsense?"
A few other great lines:
"Oh, by work together he means do what we tell you"
"The real tragedy is that they opened it back up again"
"Neutral observers, including journalists"
"Oh wow, look at that, someone just said a fact"
And of course, Mad World playing over Merrick Garland!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I mean asymmetrical polarization is real. They just got it the wrong way.
so many good ones.
"Journalist bad cuz they say thing i no like"
The conservatives have failed to conserve ANYTHING, from our 2nd amendment, to our first. From the sanctity of marrige to the lives of millions of unborn babies, they failed to even conserve the demographics of our country changeing it to a point i no longer recognize... 100 years ago we were reluctant to let women vote, now we let kids chop off their genetals, allow pedophillia on netflix, allow criminals to vite, and illegals to hold public office. They resist each step only slightly, before caving, the left takes the next step, they resist slightly then cave. This happens again and again and again
@@seanandrew2823 that’s because most politicians are not really conservative, they are moderate at best and realistically will go with whatever benefits them personally the most, instead of representing their constituents like they are supposed to.
I’ve always said that the worst two words they ever combined in the English language were “career politician”.
0:00 - Epic Intro
0:46 - My wife's a doctor, folks
1:29 - The Debunking begins
3:05 - Animated short!
3:26 - Comparing past Presidents...
6:55 - Republicans... the NEW extremists!
7:18 - Republicans have become extreme on immigration!
8:13 - Ronald Reagan was... pro tax hike???
9:44 - Republicans were *very* mean to Obama :(
10:40 - Republicans aren't nice to our supreme court nominees
12:26 - Criticizing Democrats = "False Neutrality"
16:41 - Extremely epic animated ending
17:15 - A special thanks to all of my supporters! If you wanna help us make more cartoons, please donate at patreon.com/freedomtoons !
Awesome! Thanks!
What the radical left do is so dishonest, they presume that their ideas are moderate, and based on that they assume that conservatives and anyone on the left of Hillary Clinton is ""extremist"", which don't make sense for a lot of reasons including the fact that the majority of the people are conservative, so by definition they can't be "extreme", only radical.
The ‘extremism’ of liberalism and conservatism depends on a lot of things.
Conservatism in itself isn’t that extreme, it’s about as extreme as what we call liberalism.
But some liberals and conservatives have special economic and cultural policies that make them more or less extreme.
So it’s a very hard question to answer, especially since the meaning ‘liberalism’ is extremely vague, and so is conservatism.
All in all, become a libertarian.
Edit: Also, the comment above me is correct, neither liberals or conservatives can by definition be extreme.
@@Ludovicus1769 And when did I said or implyed otherwise?
@@usuariosarcastico512 Well yes, that’s what the radical left is like, mostly. The left in itself is a hard term, as it covers a whole bunch of ideologies, I guess that so does the ‘radical left’ but all those ideologies are mostly commie, so who cares about those?
Fun fact: opposing immigration used to be a left wing talking point.
Since once upon a time, the left cared about worker's rights, and understood that more workers entering the country would depress wages.
The right at that time represented employers who were in favour of immigration since so they could hire cheaper labour.
So what is called a left or right wing standpoint can not only change but completely reverse over time.
Things change? Holy shit no way
@@DeezN1892 ya and that the point
thats
Liberals used to be strong nationalists too, all the European uprisings of 1848 were liberals who demanded freedom of speech, weapon rights, freedom of press, and nationalist governments.
@@northwestpassage6234 turns out liberalism was actually good until it became distorted by socialist ideals.
"scornful of compromise"
Considering the political divide is now essentially a moral divide, compromise on a moral basis is to become immoral.
Hmm, I wonder why compromise would be so difficult? One platform is for the opposite of every moral norm we've basically ever had, and the other is trying to conserve the morals that were essential for making society basically able to work!
You are aware you're contributing to that divide, right now, right? Nine times out of ten, people who disagree with you are not evil. They're usually trying to do good, but don't understand what they're being told.
Look at Black Lives Matter. The majority of people who repeat that are white, 40+ soccer moms who just see the tagline, hear it's about helping black people, and leave it at that. They WANT to do good, they're just being misled by the minority of evil, scumbag motherfuckers using those peoples good nature to mask their own evil doing.
The problem is that media has made everyone so fucking tribal, so convinced of the 'other' being evil, that no one is willing to step across the aisle, and talk. And those that are are viewed as traitors by wherever they came from, and liars or fence-sitters by the side they're talking to.
No one can even hear an issue and fucking think about it. Because it has to agree with the tribe. 'What does the chief say? That's what I say.'
I'm considered conservative. And yet, I'm pro-choice. Pro-prostitution. Pro-reactional drug use. I'm also willing to listen to people who disagree with me, to understand their reasonings. And most times, it's straight ignorance.
Don't sink to their level. Offer the hand. It'll get slapped away most times, but fuck them, be better than them. Because if we don't fucking talk, this shit will never end.
The problem with that is, if it's something that one side ABSOLUTELY cannot stand or allow then that creates anger, which leads to more anger from the other side wondering why they're so close-minded to new ideas, which leads to treating the first side as a joke. Which leads to more anger, and more belittling, which leads to absolutely nothing valuable
Just because a political party says, "No", doesn't make them extreme. The entire argument Carlos is making is a pretty lame and disingenuous one.
Kid- "My parent's never let me do what I want!"
Counselor- "It's because you keep wanting to set everything on fire and kill kittens."
A responsible person knows when to say "No" and do so maturely. When the whiney child says it, it's typically done in a taunting fashion to create a scene and make someone look more horrible than they actually are. When a group of people try to make drastic changes to the foundational principles of a nation, I'm going to say no and try to explain so in a reasonable and respectable way.
@@lostalone9320 most true thing I’ve read in awhile
Good analogy because liberals actually do want to set everything on fire, as shown by BLM’s actions.
Awesome take... now go watch walsh and a video about a man making fun of a g a y teen. He was just doxxed for it... but if you watch the actual video, the guy never did anything
@@goodolearkygal5746 It’s good you seem to agree it’s not an extreme position to just say no to utopians trying to take over and change a society.
@@dr.mr.fuzzyhat4798 Way to take words out of context. Maybe come back with a better argument and I’ll spend some time to take you seriously.
Great opening!!! Glad to see they recovered fully. I was worried for them
When the world needed them most, they came back.
how to win a debate in three easy steps by carlos:
1. say something dumb and edgy
2. try to change enough definitions so the dumb thing you said is technically true
3. get ready to cancel people when they don't fall for it
These guys Animation are the best.
But only liberals get to win arguments that way :(
4. Disagreement is violence so we have the 'right' to commit actual violence against you, which is now called 'peaceful protesting'. 🤪👍
@@dakoderii4221 so if we’re at peace with the world why are they not obliterated yet?
In fact why is WW2 not called the “Second World peace”
@Joshplayz 2018 what good
I never saw any good all I see is everything done by Biden is bad
There is no good there
1:44 - “gave them a score based on how extreme or moderate they were.”
With a method that solid, there’s no way the researchers could skew the results with their own bias!
If they used the average politics of the founding fathers as the reference point for the political center, I wonder what it would look like.
@@16m49x3 Off a cliff
That could be so but that does raise the question which way is the correct way and what could come off as bias to you could come off as correct to them
@@16m49x3 I suspect that everyone would be slightly to extremely left.
" *Neutral* observers, including *journalists* "
I'm fking dead
The telescreen said it. (Therefore it's true.)
I hear this and I can’t stop laughing.
Yep, there's nothing 'neutral' about journalism these days. Hell, the NYT doesn't want you to think for yourself, just check with them for what the 'correct' position is on everything!
Journalists it to Neutral as Oil is to Water
@@rickyshiffer1519 it is literally impossible for big brother to tell a lie, because, when big brother tells a lie it becomes true.
"They shut the government down!"
"The real tragedy was they opened it up again."
Damn, I wonder if Washington feels that burn.
I sure hope so, I almost had to call the fire department!
I can hear those Muppet critics doing their laugh at the end of this. "Huh huh huh huh hu!"
The Capital, the State, or the President?
@@Mike_Dubo
I'm going to say...
Yes.
@@nicoleforesman9860 I miss those savage old curmudgeons
Because there’s nothing extreme about declaring a potato a sexist.
ESP Mr 🥔 dude just wants to kick it ~ why don’t they just fix the butt panel on the old guy?
*inhales slowly*
SAVED
🤣
What... Wait... That was real?
@elgatochurro Yes... I wasn’t kidding... that really is a thing...
My favorite part is when he demonstrates he is aware of his bias, then chooses to be biased anyway, bc clearly that shows how fair he is being lol.
Everyone is biased, and that's O.K. The trick is to ensure your bias does not supersede facts.
Carlos Maza: "Norman Ornstein is kindov a legend"
Yeah never heard of him, what about Thomas Sowell?
Carlos Maza: * dizzolves in an acid mist *
Rekt
Hey Carlos, ever heard of Steven crowder?
Democrats don't support educated black people! They want their black where they've always wanted them. Uneducated, dependent on their owners, and poor as can be.
What I found more head scratching is when Carlos said he won debates, either he was debating a mannequin or the teacher just let him win the debates. I'm going with the latter.
The only Ornstein I know slays dragons.
"They call it-"
"Complete nonsense?"
"Asymmetrical Polarization."
"Oh."
XD
Same thing
Maza: "I'm not objective, so I'm going to bring on this actual political scientist."
Also Maza: "I used this man's arguments to win debates in high school."
SO OBJECTIVE
Winning in debate club... may have meant something if he went to a top tier private school or graduated before the mid-90's before school had been enveloped completely in the stupid.
He "won debates" in a school environment that overwhelming favored his indoctrinated position. That's like claiming you "won" a game of checkers against an opponent who was blind and deaf. It's meaningless.
@@ForeverLaxx Also, "winning" a debate doesn't make you right, any more than winning a fencing match makes you a better swordsman. It's not about whose side is right, it's about who scores the most points with their arguments and responses.
I bet he won by threatening to release a fake or overly exaggerated story about the debate forum to the parties that funded it causing a debate ad-pocalypse
@@ClokworkGremlin Well yes and no. Points in a debate are subjective. Points in a fencing match are usually objective and only become the opinion of a ref when both sides a get a light and the ref needs to make a right-of-way judgement.
He’s never won a debate.
Look at him.
No one who’s like that wins a debate.
Absolutely.
Have you seen a collegiate debate in the past 10 years? Seriously, look one up online. It's actual comedy.
“Here’s a centrist!!”
*Gives us a Democrat to prove the center is left*
Because the modern republicans are not representing the center. Even the democrats are, in european terms, Center-right. The things that the republicans say on a daily basis would be considered barbaric and medieval in european countries, where the political spectrum comes from.
@@384Freak If the democrats are "center right" you would have to consider communist's as centrists. Your spectrum is broken.
@GrapeSkoda Spoken like a true populist, always talking about the situation as if it were more grave and grim than it really is, and underlining your movement is the only hope, else "wE'rE dOoMEd!"
I'm not sure if you have ever been to Europe, but national pride didn't just die, because people are not basing their whole life around it anymore. You are basically so far removed from reality it's ridiculous. All of the most progressive countries in Europe are also amongst those with the highest living standards. Why do you figure people migrate to Germany and not to Belarus?
Also, yeah, the populist uprising bothers me more then anything; populists are not conservatives. Good conservatives want to regulate change and keep migration low and slow, which I understand their motives of. Populists are by nature reactionary and have no real political vision; they only want might for themselved and "their people", because appearently they got stuck in the 19th century.
Europe is much more prosperous then the US, and that's due to the fact that we let people from the left speak their mind, and not call them communists.
@@384Freak Simple. When a country is rich, that's where the moneyed interest is, and the moneyed interest wants mass immigration to lower wages and have less of that pesky fighting for their rights, like days off and sick days and all those pesky rights.
Also, it is rather hilarious to suggest that immigrants wanting to go to the rich countries means that the rich countries are rich because of the immigrants.
And of course, there's the fact that countries that aren't rich have better things to worry about than who allocaton of toilet rights.
@van dalen pocket woordenboek Germany
No matter what they say, liberty is not extreme, control is extreme.
Getting triggered over masks is also extreme.
@@WhaleManMan forcing people to wear your religious attire (mask) is also extreme
@@WhaleManMan getting triggered over dead multiple convicted felons is pretty extreme ;)
@@WhaleManMan Getting triggered over being misgendered is also extreme.
@@WhaleManMan yeah like wearing 2 masks will actually do anything
The leftists.... "by any means neccessary"
The right.... uses leftist tactics*
The leftists.... 'OH MY GOD, THEY ARE GOING FURTHER RIGHT"
Lol most leftists falter every time someone gets mad but go off
It’s not their fault, it’s the soy. The soy has become sentient and is waging war on the human race.
@@Carlitos1993: Soy-lent Green?
Reactionarism is ultimately better than modern day conservatism, so I honestly don't see a problem with the Dems calling us so. In many ways it is true, right-wing populism and American nationalism has grown within the GOP, just as queer rights and democratic socialism has with the Democrats.
@@darioexplario Modern day conservatism is largely reactionary. They're mostly focused on pushing back against a mistreated or underrepresented group trying to gain equal rights, and pushing against any economic policy that could improve people's lives. They've done little to nothing themselves as far as actual change goes.
He’s definitely studied the book, Rules For radicals..... “accuse others of that which you are doing yourself” - Saul Alinsky. Text book Marxist strategy.
"Conservatives have gotten further away from the center"
yeah because you are taking the center with you while you're running to the far left
No shit.
AKA moving the goal posts.
Conservatives aren’t all saints I agree they were the ones who wanted purism insisting on banning video games. Now they are more tolerable than what the Democrats have become. God why did LBJ’s legacy have to be ruined by lefts who he FOUGHT his entire life. Anti communist and all American albeit more exceptionalism with a beacon of raw power.
No kidding. My positions haven't really changed over the years but I've moved from crazy liberal to literally Hitler.
Because I like real science and common sense.
@@ErikPT To be fair, hardly any republican today cares about banning video games, but the stigma that created still seems to be in so many foolish minds today when they think of the GOP. It is a tragedy to some extent.
“They shut the government down”
“The real tragedy was that they opened it back up again”
SAVAGE
LG 📠
The worst thing for any economy is an active government.
100% accurate
"Conservatives are more extreme and that's bad."
"Knee-jerk neutrality is bad and finding fault with both sides is bad!"
What a joke.
Because neutrality ignores that one site almost destroyed the Western hemisphere in its entirety.
@@fluffynator6222 what
Fluffynator Wow your delusional. How exactly did the right almost destroy the western hemispheres in its entirety?
@@ethantidlund6388
WW2. Facism is on the rise and conservatives are helping them once again.
Fluffynator No communism is on the rise and the left wing is helping with it again. Also the Nazi’s don’t represent all conservatives they just represent a minority of extreme conservatives.
Merrick Garland a centrist. That aged badly. Our atty general who decided parents in Virginia questioning their school board were domestic terrorists.
According to this, trump is more “right-wing” than Nixon...
Sus
Trump actually is more right-wing than Nixon. Nixon changed his politics a lot after losing the 1960 election. Nixon made the EPA and opened up to China and the Soviets, which Trump, if his politics were the same then and he ran and won, would never do.
Trump is only more right-wing than Nixon because Nixon is more left-wing than Trump.
It was a 1984ian "it becomes true when we say it" thing, but Nixon was a progressive. He got us out of Vietnam (though that's not the story you're supposed to hear), but he got us out via military force. That was about the only conservative thing he did in his presidency. His major legacies outside Vietnam are (more) peace making and starting agencies.
Preferring peace is conservative, but didn't really run contrary to the left at that time.
Trump is the 2nd coming of Adolf Hitler
@@struppi441 that’s bullcrap
All Maza’s video does is support the old adage: “if you torture the data enough, it will tell you anything you want to hear”.
Is that what doctored facts are referred as these days? I can't wait for blockchain everything
@@HueMongus101 nah, doctored facts are just the same tortured facts after the gaping holes have been stitched up by a trauma surgeon. These tortured facts still have all the psychological and emotional scars of being so abused, but they're a bit better than tortured so we now call them doctored facts!
xD
Of course the Democrats would support enhanced interrogation all along...
ThEsE FaCtS ArE TeRrOrIsTs!
Once again, doubting the data leads to an absolute waste of time, festering around and doing nothing. Humanity do be fucked
The fact that youtube demonitized this immediately shows how broken their system is, and the bias is quite appaling.
The system works just fine, this is what is intended by CZcams.
definitely not fascists though. those are the big meanie conservatives who hurt their feelings using facts
@@young.angry.devildawg Lol exactly.
Actually CZcams is trying to appeal to both the Christian Right and the progressive left
@@freddykingofturtles true
Reagan didn’t raise taxes. The Legislature writes all laws, including tax law. The Democrats controlled the House and the Senate during Regan’s administration. The President can try to influence the law, by threatening to veto legislation, but that’s about it.
Those who sacrifice their Liberty for security will have neither
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety
@⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻ I believe it's "Those who would sacrifice their liberties for security shall lose both and deserve neither."
"Those who give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety, and shall soon lose both."
So you are also against government?
After the Crowder incident, nobody should take a single word of what Carlos Maza says seriously
context?
@@openlink9958 he tried to get Steven crowder banned from CZcams in 2019 after making a so called “homophobic” joke about him
@@lukeminosky2485 and it caused the second or third (I lost count) CZcams adpocalypse, which hit a whole host of content creators that had nothing to do with Mazda’s crusade, as a result. Maza’s even got fired from Vox too
Thanks for the context.
@@lukeminosky2485 If I remember right, Crowder (a comedian) was poking fun of Maza by what he literally called himself on his social media platforms.
If the republicans have gone off the rails, the democrats shot the train driver speed up on the corner, and crashed the train into a mountain
Imo, they're both authoritarian nightmares and nothing will get much better (let alone fixed) until we try something else.
No, no. The left has rebuilt the rails to go straight into the side of the mountain so crashing headlong into the rock face is the new norm.
They’re both equally extreme lmfao!
The only reason conservatives appear more extreme is because the left has become more radical, thereby shifting the middle ground. The conservatives still mostly believe the same things, it’s just what’s considered “far right” is a much lower bar
Conservatives have shifted to the left by remaining stationary on some issues and jumping left on others. 20 years ago, most Democrat politicians were against gay marriage. Now most Republican politicians are for it, including Trump.
Hillary Clinton voted for a border wall under Bush. Then Trump comes in and suddenly she’s against it.
"I am a democrat (centrist)"
Geez, no wonder these people view the likes as Tim Pool as being "right-wing". I bet his political compass is just as centred as Stalin.
Hes moved more right...ie. Guns. But still center left...ie. Abortion
They think they're the center of the universe, no wonder they view themselves as centrists
Tim has changed his views to be a little more right. he supports the 2nd amendment strongly now (thanks crowder) but overall he's still center left on most of his views.
@@JAOResnik It's truly sad, their political compass is so far off whack, atheist liberals like myself deserve "to be put up against a wall and shot" because I'm too conservative..... Exactly how far left do you have to be to call an atheist liberal a conservative.
@@jfast8256 like liberal as center left, or liberal like the dictionary definition? Either way, it's bad people feel that way.
The Debunkers are literally the only way I would make it through a video with Carlos Maza... I genuinely cannot stand him, not just superficially, but his politics are so unbearably lacking in self-awareness and he delivers them with such repugnant smug and sass; he reminds me of every reason why I walked away from the Left.
There are few people I actually hate and I despise that fucking fool
He is truly is repugnant and completely lacking in self awareness .
And never for once mentions the family he was born into, literally reaping the fruits of capitalism
@@kakalimukherjee3297 B-but he’s one of the good rich people you see!
@@SteveSmith-ty8ko H-he cares about he p-p-poor people
I just immediately stop trusting someone who says “This is bad for our democracy.” That just sounds extremely Orwellian or whatever you guys call it
Especially since the US is a Republic, not a Democracy.
@@herrschaftg35 lol i was actually about to reply with this
@@herrschaftg35 when anyone says “our democracy” I stop listening to what follows because they’ve already shown that they don’t understand our governmental system
@@the_flying_airplane5335 they say it intentionally to gaslight
Democracy is fake and gay
I love being told we are going more extreme while my values stay the exact same
"Supreme Courts seats shouldn't remain open!"
*RBG croaks*
"About that..."
"Political scientists call this-"
"-Complete nonsense!"
"Asymetrical Polarization"
Hey! You were right!
Well they were partially correct. There is asymmetrical polarization... Only difference is, it’s the left getting radicalized while the right has actually moved slightly to the left, just gotten more agitated as it happened.
@@QualityPen Just here to point out Trump is the first president in history to be elected supporting gay marriage and had an LGBTQ+ flag in the background the day he won.
Obama was first elected well being completely opposed to it.
@@VioletDeathRei lmao, it's amazing and kinda funny in a sad way that that's ignored.
@@VioletDeathRei posturing for cameras is one thing, but he actually signed bills making it legal for doctors to discriminate against lgbtq folks, during a pandemic no less.
@@markdouglas1601 And instantly lying to me I get tired of this.
The original bill prohibited discrimination based on sex not gender, Trump did not change the bill what he signed was a reversal of an addendum that said "sex is gender" by Obama which every single transgender person on the face of existence says are not the same daily and he affirmed that.
The addendum was to circumvent having to make a new law which has already been made and passed and no one was prevented from suing just because the change.
So in other words he not Obama agreed with the transgender community's definition of sex and gender and so the media said that means he hates them.
You can stop the propaganda any day now he's not even in office anymore it's Biden striping away your healthcare now like repealing Trump's order that lowered the cost of insulin for diabetics.
The Democrats are like an abusive spouse who keeps trying to gaslight you into thinking their beating your face in whenever you voice an opinion is somehow your fault, saying, "Why do you keep forcing me to hit you? Why won't you just cooperate with me?"
No. They ask why you are hurting them as they hit you.
Can confirm.
Amber Heard?
"Republicans have become more conservative"
Hahaha
"Democrats have stayed consistent"
Haaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaa
Just realized they're called "the debunkers" and they're living in a bunker.
I am the stupid
your IQ has increased back to above average. welcome to the club.
They also did so to not need to deal with "troglodytes" (cave dwellers).
Atleast you were smart enough to admit the mistake, and you actually learned something. Well done
The short ones wearing two monocles to.
So basically it went something like this.
Democrats: *Walk away and draw a line in the sand*
Republicans: *Stay in the same place*
Democrats: "WHY ARE YOU WALKING AWAY FROM US?"
If you don’t think trunk walked away from the line you need your head examined
@@8ball548 Damn who’s this Trunk guy, is he related to Trunks?
@@SteveSmith-ty8ko I think he's related to Groot from Guardians of the Galaxy, he is his uncle, I believe
@@8ball548 Gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8. But truthfully have you received your two stacks yet?
@@8ball548 0010101011100101110110100111100010101111010111012
...*mic drop*...
I find it interesting that they started looking at history going no further back than 1960s, when the shift started in the 1920s.
Probahition and the FDR’s Great New Deal?
@frank anderson oh
Well of course because the world was a bit too foggy and probably non existential for them to understand
The video refers to a political shift that birthed the modern landscape of politics, where the south is predominantly red (post Civil Rights Act).
Well I’ve never read such horse shit
I’m a Democrat, and while our politics may be totally different, your channel is amazing and keep up the good work.
So long as you don't support the murdering of children or a certain domestic terror organization then no Republican would care that you're a Democrat.
@@RejectedRecords1998 i’m also a Democrat and I believe domestic terror is a very broad and misconscued term of people from all over the political spectrum that just have a violent side to them that should be dealt with. Also at heart I’m against abortion I believe the best way to deter abortion is to not outright ban it but to promote the use of birth control and teach safe sex so people aren’t in those situations in the first place, therefore, in a way, we could stop before abortions before they’re even considered it’s a win-win, and I don’t know why more people aren’t talking about what I believe to be a very good compromis. to this issue
@@TimmyTheTinman You make a few valid points, and the solution to most of our issues *are* compromises...but seriously, punctuate your rants bro. Throw a period in every now and then, for the sake of everyone who's reading...
@@zeked4200 I fixed it thank you for the advice
respectable 👍
"neutral observers, like journalists" Oh, so that's what we're gonna do here, we're just gonna lie to each other. Okay.
If democrats didn’t lie, they would never speak. And if they weren’t evil, they wouldn’t exist.
“Let’s address the soyboy in the room: I am not the person to be making this argument”
Perhaps the only thing Maza and I will ever agree on.
“Let’s address the soyboy in the room: I am not the person to be making this argument”
Then don’t, genius
@@thundursa8700 he's paid to say it probably
Who would openly admit and be proud of being a soyboy?
Who would openly admit and be proud of being a soyboy?
Bro right as he said that I read this comment. Why does it happen everytime someone brings up something in the video in the comments, suddenly i’m in the exact moment
This guy again? Didn't Crowder teach him this lesson already?
Some people are really slow... I mean, like snails, sloths, or turtles slow.
You'd think after getting MASHED by crowder you'd kinda back off the spotlight but here we are.
No he didn't learn his lesson but the executives at Vox did. He got fired for attempting the same tactics on Tucker after the Crowder fiasco.
I think this was an old vox video from back when he still had a job. I vaguely remember Crowder doing a bit on this chart
@@ltksm good I cannot stand this beautiful and brave human being
"Gay and atheist"
What are the chances?!?!
Lol
Quiz time!!!!!!!
How many infidels(atheists) are very, very s1nful? (apart from being infidels, obviously).
None of them
Some of them
Many of them
Most of them
Super majority of them
90% of them
EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.
Rule of thumb, anything with Calos Maza in it, is going to be garbage.
And anything in Carlos Maza is going to be a man's thumb.
not true, this video was great
@@lucasfabisiak9586 haha 😂 that was gold. But you’re also right. A man’s thumb for starters. I very rarely find myself laughing and dry heaving at the same time 😂😖🤢🤮
Anything Vox is garbage
@@devinmccanna645
It’s literally debunked before your eyes lol
"YOURE EXTREMIST FOR NOT BOWING TO OUR DEMANDS AND LETTING US INCH CLOSER AND CLOSER TO OUR END GOALS AT THE EXPENSE OF YOUR GOALS!"
--every conservative in America
@@TheBeatlesShow - anyone claiming that one side doesn't want compromise is what I was suggesting, but your commie brain rot is quite a debilitating disability.
@@TheBeatlesShow Yes because we’re the ones who harass/cancel anyone who disagrees with us :)
not at the expense of our goals, at the expense of our constitution and our integrity
@@TheBeatlesShow I'm not either of them but as a poc, I'd definitely settle with conservatives, even the extremists, because at least they won't try to act like they care so much and then cancel me out of my race if ever I have a different opinion about their ideals.
There's a good reason why "classical liberal" effectively means conservative.
According to the left anyone right of Stalin is a "right wing extremist"
No joke, I rate as moderate lib right on the political compass test, but according to 8Axis my political ideology is "liberalism"
@@HunterStiles651 Well there's a difference between being a liberal and a "liberal". Most people who say they're a liberal nowadays don't believe in liberty whatsoever
it means a certain style of what is often seen as conservative but 20 or so years ago would NOT have been seen as such
@@adg932 that’s fascism now don’t you know?
and now that we know his daughter is involved with CRT education, yeah, I'm thinking Garland ain't exactly a moderate
"I've been in politics linger than you've been alive!"
Ok, so if I get Thomas Sowell to agree with me I'm automatically correct, too.
I see.
best way to fight something like this is not engage. just say "correct" and move on. they are trying to jockey for position by starting conflict.
@@sorrymrgoogle2601 "correct" and move on.
you don't like thomas sowell?
@@mrlean5078 It's the fact that Sowell has been in economics longer than most of us have been alive presumably.
Thank you. As if their "history" in politics automatically means we have to submit to their authority.
When I came to my faith in 2003, I learned more in my first two years about the Bible and my God than some people had with their 20 years in the church ( sadly). Making an appeal to one's time in a field is somewhat valid, but not a guarantee they actually know what they're talking about, or have any more wisdom than the newbie.
"There seems to be no grownups in charge"
The most truthful and honest statement I have ever heard.
The shame is that we are looking for people to be "in charge" at all.
Best argument against giving people "in charge" more power.
I think the debunkers are the manifestation of Seamus’s hate for the world
We live in a society after all
A man after my own heart...
Yeah yeah seems justified....
that explains why i like these skits so much.
Seamus is single handedly the best person just the best
This was the single most savage skewering of lefty bias denial I have ever seen, and that's saying something. Outstanding work.
Vox is like that one person who mumbles to themselves in the lunchroom....
So a bit like me but left wing
And just like that he won another argument.
yes
Hey there H.W.
Loudly.
The chart doesn’t include trump because he is far more moderate than Bush
That would push the center bar way too far right, showing that there was something wrong with his graph
@@HueMongus101 anything right of one of these far left nut jobs is an evil Facist extremist. They think they are the balanced centrists.
@NormalSodaGuy Trumps stance on immigration and citizenship is literally the same as Bill Clinton’s. 90s Bill Clinton would be cancelled in a heartbeat and make Trump look like hippie if he was running for president today.
The chart doesn't include Trump because updated versions of those charts show that left have taken a hard dive away from the center in recent years ... and showing that would destroy his narrative.
Truman would be closer to Eisenhower than ever Obama.
Basically: they've moved so far left normal conservative policies now look like the final solution to them.
While actively supporting camps to re educate those they disagree with, so that they won't have problems with dissent ever again....
they moved so far left that the came around the other side and are now preaching the final solution
Conservatives hate normal policies in better countries like FREE HEALTHCARE
I've had this conversation with liberal friends and they just can't seem to grasp it. The left and center have moved so far left that even most moderate republicans today would be considered extreme left by 1980's standards. Also how come no one talks about how far up both sides have gone?
Because liberals have a narcissistic deity complex, and most conservatives are liberal lites.
"Over the decades, Republican's have become less and less submissive"
I think the soy boy meant to say. He seems to not really understand how words work. Or statistics.
It's hard to understand how words work when so many words are given a new definition every other week.
Politics is Summarized by the following sentence:
Hypocrisy is only okay when I do it.
No
@@counterfeit1148 It was mostly a joke anyway XD. My only point was that people usually fail to see their own flaws and point out that of others.
@@GameJam230 100% true.
How dare you use my hypocrisy against me. I won't stand for this whataboutism.
Whoever characterizes autonomous zones as peaceful protests loses the "who's the extremist" argument.
Fr tho
Whoever characterizes Antifa as "just an idea" is not a centrist or true right-winger. The soyboy in the video has no right to preach about extremism or anything else for that matter, he can shove it.
@@averagejoeschmoe9186 the person who characterizes Antifa as an idea, must have been locked in a basement for a year or something.
Anyone that believes that Jan 6th was Trump supporting Republicans and not democrat backed antifa has relinquished all rational thought and now relies solely upon the democrat propaganda networks to give them the narrated talking points
We need the debunkers so badly
I can't believe Carlos Maza still has a job.
Right? I'm tempted to go get into an accident and contract a brain injury so I can get a job like his.
he doesn't he has been fired and it's a 2 year old video. But it's more relevant today than ever I guess...
@@captainvanisher988 He got fired, good. I'm sick of double standards.
Batgirl and super girl got sever season even with 90% less people watching it than those who watched firefly. Hollywood is no longer about making good content, and hiring good people. They're willing to lose billions to further their activist causes. I mean they can always just get a government bailout.
Only reason he is around still is because he leeches off his rich parents while publishing his hypocritical communist BS, and he even has the gall to have a patreon for it
Btw putting Kennedy as more left than Obama is hilarious. Kennedy was a huge “America First” president.
He would've been a Republican if his father didn't control his political career.
The only Democrat I would have supported.
That was really weird. A lot of the rankings on that were very odd. They put Carter with Kennedy. Like wtf?
ahh i missed those rich lads
That is a weird thumbnail for someone watching this channel.
And that sounds exactly what Alastor would say.
I love that the party infamous for being slow to change literally called the conservative party are being labeled as extremists.
9:11 I've been rereading _Animal Farm_ . Maza's excited gyrations make me think of Squealer: "He was a brilliant talker, and when he was arguing some difficult point he had a way of skipping from side to side and whisking his tail which was somehow very persuasive. The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white."
Animal Farm, Brave New World, and 1984 should be required reading for graduation in all states.
@@mikelmcknight72 But they need to be taught by someone who understands that these are dystopias (and _bad_ ) because, at age 18, students haven't seen enough of the world, or history, or current events, to recognize _any_ real-world parallels. An activist teacher could just as easily present them as "how-to" books.
@@wlan246 I bet you have no idea who George Owell was or what those books were criticising. You probably think they're against "communism" or "socialism" (which you don't know the difference between)
@@DeezN1892 Your Psychic Hat is on crooked.
@@wlan246 Look up why he wrote it and what inspired him. From his own mouth. Not weird right wing angles and bullshit about ‘how to’
“Knee-jerk neutrality” holy mother of mercy this is really beyond parody at this point
*gunshot
Liberal holding the gun: "What the fuck was that?"
Mainstream Media: "This just in, a Democrat was just threatened with an assault weapon that was mere inches from their arm. The weapon was said to have voted Republican"
"No Trump! No wall! No USA at all!" Ah, the rallying cry of every normal centrist American.
😂 they really know what we are ab
I hate obama for being gay
@Robert Ortiz-Wilson you know it's true tho
@@badita2618 I dislike o Bama for hating America and the American people
Why would you hire a guy to be CEO of your company/ Country that openly admits that he hates your company and its products??????
@@joannem3568 I like soup too
"Its bad for democracy". Well that's a good thing then considering we ARENT A DAMN DEMOCRACY! We are a Constitutional Republic with limited government.
If you vote for the leader, you are a democratic Country. You may be a republic, but you're still democratic.
@@U9DATE then say indirect democracy.
Ancient Greece is democracy.