For those still confused watch shamsi previous video, refuting doubts around salafiyah around 9mins in he explains differnt kinds of warning against people like tahtheer and tabdī. Highly reccomend you watch.
One thing you guys should remember is that when he spoke about the first 2 brothers Arh and At he still said they are our brothers. In terms of aqeedah they are generally upon the same thing. All that was pointed out is their mistakes according to whar they know and this happens vice versa. This isnt personal at all so people on the comments should stop acting like football fans and blindly supporting according to their emotions . Come with proof and evidences simple i consider Arh as out brothers but he has mistakes like everyone elae and he isnt free from correction like the rest of us.
Abdur-Rahman Hassan committed many wrongs out of ignorance, self-amazement, misguidance and sheer recklessness. So he must recant in detail for his errors in consideration of the following: 1. He is ignorant of the details of the Salafi Manhaj and ‘Aqīdah yet he put himself forward to debate a takfīrī devil publicly on camera. This said takfīrī who has declared the kings of Saudi Arabia and the Salafi scholars to be unbelievers and apostates. 2. Throughout this debate Abdur-Rahmān is constantly seen “bootlicking” this takfīrī with lavish praises such that one is left in a state of bewilderment! This is a clear contradiction to Islām. 3. He refers to this takfīrī as “our shaikh…” throughout and admits benefitting from him, thus inviting others to benefit from him. Revering of a khārijī, pro-terrorist, pro-ISIS innovator opposes the Salafi Manhaj by the Revelation and ijmā’. He took this innovator as his shaikh?! 4. After Abu Khadeejah corrected him and refuted him [without naming him], Abdur-Rahmaan responded with lies and falsehood [that he now recognises] yet has offered no apology to Abu Khadeejah for falsely accusing him. So he must name the video, remove it and make tawbah. He must apologise for making that lengthy worthless “refutation”. None of this has been done to-date. 5. He attacked Dārus-Sunnah and Salafi Publications and has still not retracted or apologised for the slander. Why? 6. His claim (or that of his hizb) that Shaikh Rabī’ praised the Khawārij when he knows full well that Shaikh Rabī’ was merely stating that the Khawārij of today are worse than the Khawārij of old in ‘aqeedah. So this accusation is a slur upon the honour of this major scholar. In this, he has followed the misguided hizbīs around him who have reviled Shaikh Rabī’ for several years due to their fanaticism for Alī Hasan Al-Halabī, Al-Hajūrī, Al-Ma’ribī and other deviants. Just look to his companionship. 7. He should thank Abu Khadeejah, Abdulilaah Lahmami, Salafi Publications and Dārus-Sunnah by name after his previous criticism of them because they were the ones who corrected him whilst his own hizb stood by for a year and patted his arrogant back and crippled him. 8. In his eagerness to refute Ahlus-Sunnah who repudiated his falsehood, he invented a lie against the Messenger (salallahu `alaihi wassallam) and his Companions for which he had no Salaf, no ‘Ālim and no sound reasoning except to justify his praise of ahlul-bid’ah. 9. Instead of accepting the truth and displaying humility after the scholars corrected him, he started “phoning around” for a “fatwa”, fishing in murky waters to oppose the clearcut statements of Shaikh Al-Fawzān, Shaikh Al-Luhaydhān, Shaikh Abdur-Rahmān Muhiyud-Dīn, Shaikh Abdullāh An-Najmī, and others. This is a disrespect to the scholars further illustrating his conniving, self-conceited character. 10. He must repent from his bid’ah wherein he insisted that it was valid to praise ahlul-bid’ah for the ‘good’ that is with them of worship, recital of the Qu’ran and so on (the bid`ah of al-Muwāzanah). He ascribed this praise of ahlul-bid’ah to Allāh’s Messenger (عليه الصلاة و السلام) and his Companions, thereby ascribing it to Islām. He persisted in this even after being refuted by Abu Khadeejah and Abdulilāh Lahmāmī. This is an innovation that opposes the texts and ijmā’. For these oppositions, he must repent, recant and clarify in accordance to the Salafi Manhaj, not deliver a deceitful lecture [as he has done] on the “virtues of returning to the truth” for which his hizb have patted him on the back - the same hizb who patted him on the back for his original crime - and the same hizb who will no doubt pat him on his back regardless of his crimes until he becomes too much of a liability for them! Then there is the issue of his hizbiyyah which still flows through him in torrents due to his attachment to Al-Halabī, Al-Huwainī, the Hajāwirah, etc. That will require some serious sincerity. May Allāh guide him or break him.
There is a singer from my coutry who said my wish is to stop signing and there is a so called " imam" who said musique is not haram WELL THUS IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SINNER AND A MISGUIDED ( Mobtadi'e )
Those who interrupt you and never let you finish have no backbone to stand on and they know if they keep you talk you will make a strong point against them and will put them in a weak corner. That's what we see the Shia do all the time to others. Just interrupt interrupt interrupt.
Abdur Rahman Hassan also does not seem to care what kind of people he brings to his platform. For example, he is okay with bringing people from Jamiat Ahlul Hadith Hind (Indian political Hizbi party, also has branches in Pakistan and UK). This Jamiat is known for promoting democracy, sitting with Sufis, Shi'ahs, Hindus and cooperating with them. The Jamiat is also known for having extreme partisanship (Hizb) towards their political leaders and basing their walaa and baraa on their party's interest. They have been refuted and warned by Allamah Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله and many brothers have detailed refutations of their extreme misguidance. Similarly, many ulema including Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله have warned against such political parties that take part in democracy. You will be able to understand their misguidance better if you speak Urdu like me. Regardless, ARH deliberately brought Zafar ul Hassan from India to his platform recently and uploaded multiple of his videos. The same Zafar ul Hassan, who is a well known supporter of Jamiat, also went to a conference with "Mufti" Menk as one of the speaker. Zafar Ul Hassan is also a known ally and a friend of Jamiati Anees ur Rahman, who has publicly called Sheikh Rabee’ حفظه الله a TAKFIRI (audhubillah). Anees ur Rahman also said during the Indian elections that voting at the time of elections is the most important thing for Muslims. ARH also brought Abu Zaid Zameer to his platform, another person who supports and praises extreme Jamiati deviants like Meraj Rabbani (who said that Hindu false diety "Hanuman" was a Muslim along with many other deviant statements and Hizbi actions) and Jalaluddin Qasmi (supporter of Zakir Naik and known for his deviant statements). Furthermore, Tim Humble, who's very active on ARH's platform was seen sitting with Ali Hasan Al-Halabi, who has been refuted and called an innovator by the senior scholars like Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله and Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله. Lastly, the point I'm making is, our brothers at Salafi Publications who refuted him years ago were not unjust. And debating with Ahlul Bid'ah is not the only problem with ARH, contrary to common misconception. Alhamdulillah the brothers at Salafi Publications are sincere in the deen and you often see that the person they refute only gets worse and shows his true colors as the time passes. So my brothers, stick to the people who do not water down the Manhaj of the Salaf. Asslamu Aleikum.
Would i be sinful if i were to take knowledge from them (abdurrahman hasan and Muhammad tim humble) on their AMAU channel? Even tho the books they go through are classical books (principles of islam and shirk etc) with explanations from Renowned shuyukh, like Fawzan, taymiyyah etc. Is it sinful just because of the teacher, regardless of whether the actual lesson or knowledge being taught is of benefit? This matter really confuses me. Any advice.
"if you have a problem with shamsi, come discuss .... " I've been trying to get hold of him through email to arrange various discussions outside of speakers corner, but he doesn't respond. Anyone know how I can get hold of him...
ikhwanis are same as khawarij their ultimate goal is to reach the head of the state and take power of the country and for that goal they do many evil things like refuting prophet hadiths about obeying the hakim of the country president or whatever you wanna call it, also they don't follow the guidance of all the prophets and messangers who prioritize daawa over power and. and also the most evil thing they do is starting revolutions in arabic countries so that they take power, see what's happening no some arabic countries are divided like sudan others are destroyed like syria, Lebanon, yamen, irak, lybia etc.... they don't mind ppl dying and countries destroyed as long as they have a 1% Chance of taking over the country
Ikhwanul Muslimeen Ammassed all the Misguided sects into 1 for political purposes this sect was invented in 1928-1929 they blew up with TV and technology. They are not upon the Quran and Sunnah but they claim to be. They are in opposition to the Quran and Sunnah and the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) has ZERO Accociation with them. Their Beliefs leads to the hellfire.
Why you Think That -- In the Quran Muhammad Meaning The Name of the Meccan Prophet's ?? Because of "" Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAAN , Yaahoodiyy"AAAAN , Nasaaraaniyy"AAAAN , Muslim"AAAN , muslim"UUUN , Mh-sinai"UUUN , Yaaa Seeen , Eliaa -saaa , Elijah ,
Akhi subhanallah, exocummuting someone from Ahlul Sunnah means the’yre from Ahlul bid’ah😨not even shamsi exocomuted Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan from Ahlul Sunnah. الله يهدينا جميعا امين
@@focus_on_deen4050 they are not ahlussunah tho, sitting with people of misguidance and innovation is not from sunnah. And quoting the salaf but opposing them in *ACTIONS* is an innovation/misguidance
Rasool Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said: “My ummah will split into seventy-three sects, all of whom will be in the Fire except one sect.” They said: Who are they, O Messenger of Allah? He said: “[Those who follow] the path which I and my companions follow.” [It was classed as hasan by Ibn al-‘Arabi in Ahkaam al-Quran (3/432), al-‘Iraqi in Takhreej al-Ihya’ (3/284) and al-Albaani in Saheeh at-Tirmidhi.]
We don’t put anyone in jannah or jahannam stop lying The Messenger said that the one who dies without making shirk will enter jannah and 72 sects are threatened with the fire and the only saved group are the true salafis who are upon what The Messenger and his companions are upon save yourself you will not be asked about others study the authentic sunnah and the books of the salaf and stop being a parrot and a blind follower
Because cleaely the prophet said islam will sepparate in 73 sects 72 will be in hellfire and only 1 in jannah. The sunnah refutes you and comfirms the validity of salafia.
Amazing clarification honestly what I needed during these confusing times
What did he say ? He spoke manly about khariji than the original questions instead of talking about original questions on ARH and Abu taymiyah.
Unless you believe the ARH/ Abu T are kharijis
Yeh bro what did he say that was an amazing clarification?
Look at the defenders of those who water down salafiya in this comment section
@@Randomhandlename no proof just accusations where are you guys gonna hide on judgement day?
Shamsi the best in this corner, wallahi no games, no nothing, only Quran, sunnah, and back to the scholars Alhamdulillah
جزاك الله خيرا وبارك فيكم
True brother Shamsi Jazak Allah khayer
Tabarakallah, very clearly explained.
جزاكم الله خيرا
اللهم اعز الاسلام والمسلمين
بارك الله فيكم
Jazakallahu khair
Barak Allah feekum akhi 😊
For those still confused watch shamsi previous video, refuting doubts around salafiyah around 9mins in he explains differnt kinds of warning against people like tahtheer and tabdī. Highly reccomend you watch.
What is the link
One thing you guys should remember is that when he spoke about the first 2 brothers Arh and At he still said they are our brothers. In terms of aqeedah they are generally upon the same thing. All that was pointed out is their mistakes according to whar they know and this happens vice versa. This isnt personal at all so people on the comments should stop acting like football fans and blindly supporting according to their emotions . Come with proof and evidences simple i consider Arh as out brothers but he has mistakes like everyone elae and he isnt free from correction like the rest of us.
Ok thank you for clarifying brother. So is it still ok to watch and take knowledge from their videos on youtube on AMAU?
Abdur-Rahman Hassan committed many wrongs out of ignorance, self-amazement, misguidance and sheer recklessness. So he must recant in detail for his errors in consideration of the following:
1. He is ignorant of the details of the Salafi Manhaj and ‘Aqīdah yet he put himself forward to debate a takfīrī devil publicly on camera. This said takfīrī who has declared the kings of Saudi Arabia and the Salafi scholars to be unbelievers and apostates.
2. Throughout this debate Abdur-Rahmān is constantly seen “bootlicking” this takfīrī with lavish praises such that one is left in a state of bewilderment! This is a clear contradiction to Islām.
3. He refers to this takfīrī as “our shaikh…” throughout and admits benefitting from him, thus inviting others to benefit from him. Revering of a khārijī, pro-terrorist, pro-ISIS innovator opposes the Salafi Manhaj by the Revelation and ijmā’. He took this innovator as his shaikh?!
4. After Abu Khadeejah corrected him and refuted him [without naming him], Abdur-Rahmaan responded with lies and falsehood [that he now recognises] yet has offered no apology to Abu Khadeejah for falsely accusing him. So he must name the video, remove it and make tawbah. He must apologise for making that lengthy worthless “refutation”. None of this has been done to-date.
5. He attacked Dārus-Sunnah and Salafi Publications and has still not retracted or apologised for the slander. Why?
6. His claim (or that of his hizb) that Shaikh Rabī’ praised the Khawārij when he knows full well that Shaikh Rabī’ was merely stating that the Khawārij of today are worse than the Khawārij of old in ‘aqeedah. So this accusation is a slur upon the honour of this major scholar. In this, he has followed the misguided hizbīs around him who have reviled Shaikh Rabī’ for several years due to their fanaticism for Alī Hasan Al-Halabī, Al-Hajūrī, Al-Ma’ribī and other deviants. Just look to his companionship.
7. He should thank Abu Khadeejah, Abdulilaah Lahmami, Salafi Publications and Dārus-Sunnah by name after his previous criticism of them because they were the ones who corrected him whilst his own hizb stood by for a year and patted his arrogant back and crippled him.
8. In his eagerness to refute Ahlus-Sunnah who repudiated his falsehood, he invented a lie against the Messenger (salallahu `alaihi wassallam) and his Companions for which he had no Salaf, no ‘Ālim and no sound reasoning except to justify his praise of ahlul-bid’ah.
9. Instead of accepting the truth and displaying humility after the scholars corrected him, he started “phoning around” for a “fatwa”, fishing in murky waters to oppose the clearcut statements of Shaikh Al-Fawzān, Shaikh Al-Luhaydhān, Shaikh Abdur-Rahmān Muhiyud-Dīn, Shaikh Abdullāh An-Najmī, and others. This is a disrespect to the scholars further illustrating his conniving, self-conceited character.
10. He must repent from his bid’ah wherein he insisted that it was valid to praise ahlul-bid’ah for the ‘good’ that is with them of worship, recital of the Qu’ran and so on (the bid`ah of al-Muwāzanah). He ascribed this praise of ahlul-bid’ah to Allāh’s Messenger (عليه الصلاة و السلام) and his Companions, thereby ascribing it to Islām. He persisted in this even after being refuted by Abu Khadeejah and Abdulilāh Lahmāmī. This is an innovation that opposes the texts and ijmā’.
For these oppositions, he must repent, recant and clarify in accordance to the Salafi Manhaj, not deliver a deceitful lecture [as he has done] on the “virtues of returning to the truth” for which his hizb have patted him on the back - the same hizb who patted him on the back for his original crime - and the same hizb who will no doubt pat him on his back regardless of his crimes until he becomes too much of a liability for them!
Then there is the issue of his hizbiyyah which still flows through him in torrents due to his attachment to Al-Halabī, Al-Huwainī, the Hajāwirah, etc. That will require some serious sincerity. May Allāh guide him or break him.
@@danishsheikh2470 No absolutely not akhi. Read my reply above.
@@HATL201 Ok so is there anyone else I can take knowledge from? Besides from the scholars of the Salaf like shaykh ibn baz and ibn uthaymeen
Yes you can, they are Salafi brothers
بسم الله
There is a singer from my coutry who said my wish is to stop signing and there is a so called " imam" who said musique is not haram WELL THUS IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SINNER AND A MISGUIDED ( Mobtadi'e )
Mashallah, that singer is safer than that misguided mobtadi'e
Brother the point with ahkam as siyam was a bit confusingly because it has several books to it
Can we please find out who Ali Dawahs senior leading scholars are
Sufis 😊
Maybe the ikhwaani Mohammed didu Allah knows best.
is that a serious question? he is study-phopic!
Google and CZcams?
after some research, haytham al haddad the ikhwani is one of them
How's brother Shamsi doing? I heard he was recently arrested. Hope he is alright
Those who interrupt you and never let you finish have no backbone to stand on and they know if they keep you talk you will make a strong point against them and will put them in a weak corner. That's what we see the Shia do all the time to others. Just interrupt interrupt interrupt.
Arabic translation please
😊😊😊
Abdur Rahman Hassan also does not seem to care what kind of people he brings to his platform. For example, he is okay with bringing people from Jamiat Ahlul Hadith Hind (Indian political Hizbi party, also has branches in Pakistan and UK). This Jamiat is known for promoting democracy, sitting with Sufis, Shi'ahs, Hindus and cooperating with them. The Jamiat is also known for having extreme partisanship (Hizb) towards their political leaders and basing their walaa and baraa on their party's interest.
They have been refuted and warned by Allamah Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله and many brothers have detailed refutations of their extreme misguidance.
Similarly, many ulema including Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله have warned against such political parties that take part in democracy.
You will be able to understand their misguidance better if you speak Urdu like me.
Regardless, ARH deliberately brought Zafar ul Hassan from India to his platform recently and uploaded multiple of his videos. The same Zafar ul Hassan, who is a well known supporter of Jamiat, also went to a conference with "Mufti" Menk as one of the speaker.
Zafar Ul Hassan is also a known ally and a friend of Jamiati Anees ur Rahman, who has publicly called Sheikh Rabee’ حفظه الله a TAKFIRI (audhubillah).
Anees ur Rahman also said during the Indian elections that voting at the time of elections is the most important thing for Muslims.
ARH also brought Abu Zaid Zameer to his platform, another person who supports and praises extreme Jamiati deviants like Meraj Rabbani (who said that Hindu false diety "Hanuman" was a Muslim along with many other deviant statements and Hizbi actions) and Jalaluddin Qasmi (supporter of Zakir Naik and known for his deviant statements).
Furthermore, Tim Humble, who's very active on ARH's platform was seen sitting with Ali Hasan Al-Halabi, who has been refuted and called an innovator by the senior scholars like Sheikh Rabee' حفظه الله and Sheikh Ubayd حفظه الله.
Lastly, the point I'm making is, our brothers at Salafi Publications who refuted him years ago were not unjust. And debating with Ahlul Bid'ah is not the only problem with ARH, contrary to common misconception.
Alhamdulillah the brothers at Salafi Publications are sincere in the deen and you often see that the person they refute only gets worse and shows his true colors as the time passes.
So my brothers, stick to the people who do not water down the Manhaj of the Salaf.
Asslamu Aleikum.
Jazakallahu khayran for the clarification
@@wayfarer387 wa iyyakum
We cannot take classes from tim humble ?. Could you please tell why.
فيه ترجمة بالعربية
Mohammed Hijab: senior leading scholars (who are they)
Why do you care? Just want to cause more division huh
@@abumansaray7 Yes. We need to divide between the people of truth and the people of falsehood
Dedew, Qardawi - leading deviants
@@abumansaray7 we care because these people are insulting ahlus sunnah
Yasir Qadhi
Would i be sinful if i were to take knowledge from them (abdurrahman hasan and Muhammad tim humble) on their AMAU channel? Even tho the books they go through are classical books (principles of islam and shirk etc) with explanations from Renowned shuyukh, like Fawzan, taymiyyah etc. Is it sinful just because of the teacher, regardless of whether the actual lesson or knowledge being taught is of benefit? This matter really confuses me. Any advice.
Study from the lessons of Salafi Publications and associates. Clear manhaj, not unclear.
Wait so what's the answer of the video, are they true adherents?@@ashifkhan5739
"if you have a problem with shamsi, come discuss .... "
I've been trying to get hold of him through email to arrange various discussions outside of speakers corner, but he doesn't respond.
Anyone know how I can get hold of him...
In his masjid and of course in speakers corner😂
If you really wanted to u would go to the same masjid not emails
He’s in speaker corner every Sunday
@@mohamedyusuf2568 read my messages above
Sheikh Al Albaani was asked about voting for the lesser of the two evils in the US
Voting is rigged either way what does it matter? Do you think a kuffar state is gonna take the opinion of us muslims?😂
What masjid is he referring to ?
The ones who are upon ahlul bida👍 Enough said, and ahlul bidah is easy to spot
Every masajid except for ones affiliated with wright street
What’s wrong with Tim Humble?
Who are the Pakistani scholars he mentioned in the video?
Badi'udeen Sindhi
Safi' ur Rahman Mubarakpuri.
@@pursueexcellence7737 the second isn’t Pakistani but BarakhAllahu feek
North African style is very similar to Latinos
Who is the ikhwaniis is it a political movement or a sect?
Both
Political .
ikhwanis are same as khawarij their ultimate goal is to reach the head of the state and take power of the country and for that goal they do many evil things like refuting prophet hadiths about obeying the hakim of the country president or whatever you wanna call it, also they don't follow the guidance of all the prophets and messangers who prioritize daawa over power and. and also the most evil thing they do is starting revolutions in arabic countries so that they take power, see what's happening no some arabic countries are divided like sudan others are destroyed like syria, Lebanon, yamen, irak, lybia etc....
they don't mind ppl dying and countries destroyed as long as they have a 1% Chance of taking over the country
نعم هم حمقى الاشاعره.... كبارهم اشاعره و صغارهم لا يعلمون ان قياداتهم اشعريه
Ikhwanul Muslimeen Ammassed all the Misguided sects into 1 for political purposes this sect was invented in 1928-1929 they blew up with TV and technology. They are not upon the Quran and Sunnah but they claim to be. They are in opposition to the Quran and Sunnah and the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) has ZERO Accociation with them. Their Beliefs leads to the hellfire.
what did omar sulaiman do?
أبو تيمية و عبدالرحمن حسن مميعان و أبو تيمية أشدهما تمييعا
Why you Think That -- In the Quran Muhammad Meaning The Name of the Meccan Prophet's ?? Because of "" Muhammad"UUUN , Muhammad"IIIN , Muhammad"AAAAN , Yaahoodiyy"AAAAN , Nasaaraaniyy"AAAAN , Muslim"AAAN , muslim"UUUN , Mh-sinai"UUUN , Yaaa Seeen , Eliaa -saaa , Elijah ,
Clown show
Abu hakeem and abu khadeeja are not scholars or shakhs
I disagreed with this one saying about ustaz Abdurhman and others they are our Selafi brothers
Your disagreeing does not change the fact that they are not ahlusSunnah
Akhi subhanallah, exocummuting someone from Ahlul Sunnah means the’yre from Ahlul bid’ah😨not even shamsi exocomuted Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan from Ahlul Sunnah. الله يهدينا جميعا امين
@@Randomhandlename go and study 📚 the aqida of AhlusSunnah
@@focus_on_deen4050 they are not ahlussunah tho, sitting with people of misguidance and innovation is not from sunnah. And quoting the salaf but opposing them in *ACTIONS* is an innovation/misguidance
@@Randomhandlename It is not that easy to expel someone from Ahlus-Sunnah. Be careful.
lol 😂
People still asking these juhal about who’s guided and who’s not.
You are the one Jahil here.
The so-called Salafi people believe they are the only ones going to paradise.
72 groups are where? according to revelation?
Seventy two firaq are going where?
Rasool Allah صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم said:
“My ummah will split into seventy-three sects, all of whom will be in the Fire except one sect.” They said: Who are they, O Messenger of Allah? He said: “[Those who follow] the path which I and my companions follow.”
[It was classed as hasan by Ibn al-‘Arabi in Ahkaam al-Quran (3/432), al-‘Iraqi in Takhreej al-Ihya’ (3/284) and al-Albaani in Saheeh at-Tirmidhi.]
We don’t put anyone in jannah or jahannam stop lying The Messenger said that the one who dies without making shirk will enter jannah and 72 sects are threatened with the fire and the only saved group are the true salafis who are upon what The Messenger and his companions are upon save yourself you will not be asked about others study the authentic sunnah and the books of the salaf and stop being a parrot and a blind follower
Because cleaely the prophet said islam will sepparate in 73 sects 72 will be in hellfire and only 1 in jannah. The sunnah refutes you and comfirms the validity of salafia.