Remakes are stupid - Fire Emblem 4 remake rant
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 02. 2024
- Have fun listening to me rant about the constant Fire Emblem 4 remake rumours, hopefully the eventual Nintendo direct doesn't make me look stupid. Ah well I can always make a rant video on FEH (Fire Emblem Heroes) or Fire Emblem Engage if I run out of ideas.
Discord server link: / discord
Seeing as I didn't elaborate properly in the video I might as well say, I don't think a Fire Emblem 4 remake is a completely bad idea but I'm scared that:
A. They might ruin the story.
And B. They might change crucial bits of the gameplay.
Yes the game is dated in some regards but I'm worried they might do smth that would drastically change the game like removing the pursuit skill, a remake could be good like SoV but there's also the chance for the opposite.
Disagreeing is fine and encouraged, I've been proven wrong with my thoughts in Engage before it released so I may well be wrong again so only time can tell.
with how they handle SOV im not to worried about point A. or B. but that may be hopefully thinking.
Most people who like fire emblem haven't played half of the games due to them only being released in Japan. Thats already reason enough to do remakes
Yes but I feel like ports would be more effective at expanding the accessibility of the series than remakes are. And besides they're easier to produce than a full on remake.
Nintendo's virtual console apparently wasn't actually all that successful, which is what pushed them to do the live service drip feed approach we have with NSO. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the costs of developing a remake of a game is greatly outweighed by the benefits of getting to market it as a new game and sell it for full price. Though it's sad to admit, most gamers these days don't care to play games older than 6th gen.@@Finnland278
@@Finnland278 Well not really no, people want games with modern touchups. FE4 is dated in a lot of ways that won't be appealing for most people.
I once saw a video making a pretty big point about how Fire Emblem Engage was a massive golden opportunity wasted.
This was nintendo and IS's chance to make several games available to the public, but ironically, even less titles were available for purchase by the time Engage was released, since the 3DS e-shop's closing alone killed off at least 3 fire emblem games from the market. Add the NES shadow dragon controversy on top of that, and you're potentially looking at three times the amount of fire emblem games lost over games introduced/brought back.
@@nuibaba280 "Modern touchups" aren't always a good thing.
"Sonic X Shadow Generations" truly is one the best names Sega has ever come up with.
Sega bouta get sued by parents angry at their kids for searching up "Sonic X Shadow" on their family computer.
@@Finnland278if it was my family computer it would already be there
@@Estfireemblem 🤨
@@Finnland278is this the 420 subscriber special
@@Estfireemblem unfortunately it seems like I was unable to make a 420 sub special, I am in the process of making the discord server though which you can join from description if you really wanted to but currently I'm just setting up bots and will probably take a bit of time before i actively start tryna promote it.
Maybe you can treat the server as the 420 special as a compromise hopefully.
What? FE4 is a great game for its time, sure, but you have to realize it's super outdated, and if you enjoy it that's cool but it's definitely not for everyone. A remake would have a lot more general appeal and, hell, most FE4 fans would like it more than the original as well. Seems to me all beliefs of the original being superior stem from a place of elitism more than anything.
I did overexaggerate as I tend to, some parts of fe4 r dated but changing may hurt the image of the original, so thus I would say a port with a translation would be more enjoyable. I think the reputation fe4 has should be enough for it to appeal to newcomers seeing as it's hailed as one of the best fe games out there. But wanting a remake shouldn't incriminate anyone since it makes sense not everyone wants to deal mechanics they don't like such as trading or pursuit but changing the mechanics makes it seem less like fe4 and more so a completely different game. This was more so a video to rant of remakes with fe4 remake rumours being an excuse. There's plenty of issues with fe4 getting remade but I feel like they're obvious so I would just be retreading ground most people already know about.
A remake isn't bad but I think there's just a fear that they'll screw it up pretty much.
@@Finnland278 I think it's fair to worry about the charm of the original getting torn apart but, really, if you're looking for that experience you can just play it. A remake is not a remaster in the sense that it's a new experience rather than an experience renewed. I'm not saying you have to like a remake or the idea of one, but I simply don't see how it'd affect the original.
@@jeanne.mp4 yeah a remake can be a new fun idea, it just saddens me since people do sometimes not know how to use emulaters and are pretty much limited to whatever Nintendo releases, so they're essentially stuck waiting for a remake.
Not against a remake, I more so want Nintendo to treat their Western fans better by doing English ports of their games and remakes shouldn't be a replacement for the original game.
I don't hate the idea of a remake, I just hate the idea that people won't be able to play one of the best fe games imo and may be forced to play a remake which may differ heavily from the base game.
I think at this point, a Genealogy of the Holy War remake is like a Mother 3 official localization: both are highly requested to the point of becoming memes. I kind of want both of them realized if for no other reason than the thrill of the journey and for others' satisfaction.
Holy war remake is more realistic than mother 3
that's a good point but I still want echoes shadows of Jugdral. FE4 was such an ambitious game I want a remake with an even grander scale befitting it.
Let's hope that if an FE4 remake happens that they get a team as good as the one that worked on SoV to work on it.
Right now, The Thousand Year Door Remake had a launch game at May 2024. We won’t be having a remake of FE until early 2025.
Time to become a Paper Mario fan
i lost it when he put genealogy of the holy war and s tier gameplay in the same sentence
Different strokes for different blokes I suppose.
Don't even speak to me of fifa right now 😭
What worries me is the we have not seen a screen shot of the game and people are hyping up thus game. Like chill out, if the game turns out to be how echos was made a simple upgraded version with a few QOL changes and it doesn't fix the problems from the original like the huge maps then people are gonna lose interest in it and it won't sell.
This man’s mic quality is as good as his upload schedule
What about the Mario RPG remake tho?
I know this doesnt have nothing to do with the video but....
Please could someone Help me find a fe4 rom translated because i cant find one in these 3 days i've looking for one
Have you tried googling: “FE4 English rom”? That worked for me
Facts finn pfp guy.
I can’t wait to see how many fe fans react to next direct with : they are remaking fe4
Can't wait for people to comment "this aged poorly" on this video once Nintendo decides to do their February direct.
@@Finnland278 Either way It’s a W the way I see it. More fe4 always good (just please don’t touch the story and only slightly change the gameplay)
@@tellierbop true, and voiced Finn is smth i can look forward to.
@@Finnland278 voiced lex my beloved. I look forward to the supports if they are as good as SoV
If the FE games didnt add as much as they did to their remakes id agree. But they seem like they do enough to warrant the remakes having their own place in the history of the series.
Well nice video, do agree that people shouldn't just wait for a remake to try out genealogy when there's a good english patch and speed-up functions in an emulator.
However, i think that genealogy DO need a remake yes, as there's a lot of mechanics it can get improved from newer games, some of them being the rescue command, enemy AI prediction and maybe multi-turn move commands (this one being a first in the franchise but needed as genealogy has the biggest maps)
I think that most of the rant comes from the fear of a fire emblem 4 remake actually, as it has the BIGGEST chance of having its dark story botched or disfigured with the addition of the dreaded avatar player character, this is something my friend also fears, but i personally don't mind anymore.
So yeah, equal levels of things for and against the game.
Since we're talking about it already, i do want to say that i would enjoy if they re-balanced weapon weight and used strengh to remove weapon weight penalties like we have in the newer games, and perhaps also MAYBE the possibility of reclassing some gen 2 characters to accept multiple weapons, as there's no gen2 kid who can accept spears or axes, so Lex and Finn have no one to give their weapons to if they marry someone, and Arden loses his versatility as a general, being able to wield all 4 basic physical weapon types and thus, give them to the kids.
Yeah they're plenty reasons to remake fe4 as you pointed out, a remake isn't inherently a bad thing and if fe4 gets the sov treatment im sure it'll be a great game, but I usually take a more cautious approach when it comes to new game releases seeing as in my eyes there could be better games out there you could essentially play for free on an emulator so if I'm gonna spend 40 to 60 quid on a game it better be worth it.
@@Finnland278 I agree but Genealogy really needs this smoothing, i personally almost gave up on it when i played the first time because i didn't want to use the speed-up function of the emulator and hadn't turned off animations so every turn was a slog that took literal hours to get close to anything, just to get some guy killed because the AI tries to do the most damage at once and the open maps makes hard to predict where the enemies will strike.
Of course this was before i gave up and started using the speedup + turning off animations, which made the experience way more bearable.
But then there's the lack of deep thought on stuff like weapon weight and other general balance decisions that really should get some attention too.
So while i agree that many games can just be played on their original version, Genealogy is a game that is in dire need of polishment to get its true potential ready.
I would like a Fire Emblem Genealogy remake!, HOWEVER, I WOULDN'T LIKE AN AVATAR IN THE GAME, FE12 did a good job with Kris but honestly if he wasn't in the game nothing (aside from the new content) would've change that much
I'm only ok with it because it was never released outside of Japan. That's about it, really.
New nintendo direct is announced : fe4 remake confirmed :)
Stop, do you have any idea how many of these comments im gonna get in the next few days.
💀
tbh yea. fe4-6 could get by with just remaster, with slightly enchanted and of course the english patch.
but why would they do that when they can make a $70 remake
I do think you bring up some interesting points about porting over remaking. That being said, I disagree. I've played Fire Emblem 4 from beginning to end, and while it certainly is a masterpiece far ahead of its time it occasionally struggles with fully bringing out the scope of the game's plot. A remake could flesh out events like Thracian desert ambush and the battle at Belhalla, expand on lesser developed characters in the Gen 2 cast, and make the already fan-favorite units and villains even more memorable. I'm not saying that Inteligent Systems has no chance to screw a Geneology remake up (I personally disliked Engage quite a bit myself and don't want a remake to be like that) but they have proven that they can make great remakes with great storylines, and I have faith they can pull it off again.
If by "making villains memorable" it means Hilda is suddenly a "gray" character, Ishtar is recruitable and ditches Julius for Reinhardt and Julius can be saved at the end have a happy Undertale wholesome 100 ending then absolutely not.
@@zxylo786 I'm not trying to say that they should rewrite characterization to make characters "sympathetic", but rather better explore characterization already apparent in the story. Arvis is a great example of this. In the original, his character is a nuanced one torn between his Loptyr blood and his duty as a Crusader. FE4 only has a few scenes that really show this, but a remake could truly expand on it in ways the original didn't. If anything, I think a remake would double down on the darker aspects like SoV did (i.e showing more manipulation and abuse by Hilda and Julius among other things). All of that being said, I do agree that barring Arion nobody should be recruitable that wasn't in the original.
Julius is doomed no matter what. Even the awful FE3 remake still made Lorenz and Hardin die. All Modern FE games have killed the possessed main villains. Heroes doubled down on how awful Hilda is. The only one who might get fucked over is Ishtar and Ishtar alone.
Kinda sad people didn't understand this video's message, granted you could've been more clearer but your pinned comment is pretty justified in my opinion considering how every other "FE4 remake" video I see has people demanding to completely turn it into a different game.
Fire emblem genealogy is still a fairly underground game to the general public. Think about Nintendo as a company. They are sitting on so many IPs that they own, properties no other company can touch, yet they barely re release their games, doesn't matter if it is digital, remake, remaster, they so rarely do it. Fire emblem path of radiance, radiant dawn, F zero games, pokemon colosseum/xd, smash bros melee, I could go on listing games, so many obvious ones, that never saw a release past their original consoles. They could literally put so little effort into just remastering and re releasing their classic games and bank on it. Look at sony during ps3 / ps4 all the ps2 classics they made hd collections of, so easy for Nintendo to do. Could do a similar to those collections like mega man x legacy you mentioned but of path of radiance / radiant dawn, the starfox games, the old f zero games, the old metroid games, the 2d mario titles, etc.
When next video
Fire emblem 4 is weird, on one hand it is one of the best game in the series, on the other hand it has probably one of the most tedious gameplay in the of Fire emblem and unpolished mechanics, and that's mostly due to it being old and the one to introduce core mechanics that we use a lot in series. I can see why people want a remake since even tho we can just emulated it with an English patch, some may find the old graphics (call it a stylistic choice or whatever) just plain bad and rather watch a 28 min video of a guy talking about why Arvis isn't the bad guy
Put simply the better you r at the game the more fun you'll have with it, for first timers you're gonna struggle thru the desert maps and the forest in chapter 1, but when u replay the game and start learning about unit inheritance you'll find yourself enjoying the game alot more as well as already knowing a few tips and tricks that can help you out.
This video is something i couldn't agree with more. I personally would much rather have them just apply a english patch to fe4 like fe1 and spend the time and resources they would have spent on a remake making new games
Yep, as much flack as 3 houses gets I have to respect it for being unique even if it reused some ideas from older entries like crests being similar to Holy blood and reused a few names with Claude and Hilda.
id be fine with an engllish port like the FE1 offical release, but fuck virtual console. If nintendo was on steam they would be swimming in free money
Nintendo doesn't respect their own rich history enough to release a game like this on virtual console or any stream service, let alone release many titles digitally. Think how rich their history is, and how little you can actually get in the way of digital releases, remakes, or remasters etc. Like you said, they should be swimming in the Benjamin's, I think they just like their games to be rare, because business wise it makes zero sense they don't release these titles more often. Zelda, metroid, starfox, mario, fire emblem, pokemon, wario, old square rpgs, so many properties with so many opportunities. Even though they don't own the square SNES rpgs they can still work it out with enix to make it happen, they did with the snes classic for secret of mana and final fantasy 6
Genauology of the holy war is very old and has very outdated mechanics, and if it is actually REMADE, not updated like echoes (which is a waste of a remake as it keeps all of the original flaws) if it’s don’t right it can take FE4s, great story and fix it’s absolutely awful gameplay pacing and make it more interesting and accessible
SOV wasn't wasted, it didn't keep all the flaws. The story and characters were actually worth shit this time around to the point it singlehandedly carried the game out the "black sheep" shadow realm.
@@nuibaba280 yet it keeps the very monotonous gameplay, broken terrain, weird class system, awful maps, lack of weapon triangle, etc. it has better graphics, better dungeon system, and better music, that’s about it
@@a.e.5923 Other games didn't have weapon triangle either. You're nitpicking to try and use that against SOV, 3 Houses had no weapon triangle and its the most beloved game in the series. WT doesn't work for Gaiden when axe units aren't playable.
SOV would only be a waste of a remake if it was like Shadow Dragon where there was no effort in the visuals + didn't bother with making the cast have noteworthy character for once.
@@nuibaba280 axe units not being playable is another such flaws, and I do dislike 3hs lack of weapon triangle.
Irrelevant but...
Are you an AI voice? I REALLY CAN'T TELL. One moment i think its AI but the next the sound is more free flowing with just really bad compression and mic.
Lmao
No I'm not an Ai voice, I just have really bad audio, I've been taking steps to improve it so I appreciate the criticism. I've been doing some "reorganising" with regards to how I record audio so there should be an improvement.
@@Finnland278 What really tripped me up was that you didn't have a recognizable Finnish accent. I don't know if you are Finnish or if your name is a reference to something else, but there were hints of something in those speech patterns that made it more robotic :P
@@illliiiiillliii6265 yeah I'm not Finnish, the joke is the fact my pfp is Finn from Thracia 776 so thus the name is "Finn"land rather than Finland. I do like the country Finland even from before I played Thracia so I just kept the name despite several people asking me if I can speak Finish or not.
The robotic voice may be just bad line reading mixed with bad audio so not much I can say except I'll have to do better next time.
Reused content was excusable for Engage as it was designed as a celebratory anniversary game for the 30 year milestone.
Too bad they celebrated it 3 years late, ig that was more pandemics fault so maybe that point was overly harsh.
@@Finnland278 All the insiders have said it got delayed from the pandemic., which tracks with the development of other Nintendo games getting delayed.
Honestly, I'm not super worried. I haven't played the original (being the filthy casual I am), but SoV pretty much nailed it. I'm really all for making the games more accessible with modern QoL features, and there's a precedent for good FE remakes. If we get the remake, I'll buy it and play it.
FE2 had practically no story and no characters. SoV is basically a whole new game but with terrible 90s map design. FE4 and FE5 already have a very established lore and characters. A clear example of this is Ishtar. Ishtar in Heroes is a completely different person than in the game. In the game she fully loves Julius and even competes with him as to whom can kill a playable character first. In Heroes she basically ditches him for Reinhardt because he is "toxic". While in FE5 she chose Julius no questions asked. IS doesn't understand that you can be evil and selfish but still find a problem with killing children and feeding them to Satan.
@@zxylo786 You forgot one crucial fact. In Heroes, Ishtar is confirmed to be taken after her death like a lot of units are. Her regret of following Julius makes sense there. Of course there's still a chance FE4 ruins her lore but I felt the need to clarify.
@@nuibaba280 Thats the thing. In the game there is zero indication she regrets being with Julius. She just hates the child hunts. And she being paired with Reinhardt just assassinates her character even more. IS is only trying to make her redeemable because cute uwu thunder waifu.
@@zxylo786 There's zero indication that she's all in for Julius either, remember, Ishtar also got mad at Seliph's army for murdering her family. Julius is a major part of that child hunts. It's basic logic that there'd be regret, at least after her death in Heroes. Having knowledge of her death with her clearly being aware of how terrible Julius ends up being: Ishtar regretting with hindsight only makes sense. She dies with a goal unfilled and couldn't save any kids because she was dumb enough to blindly follow her shitty boyfriend.
Post FE4 death Ishtar not having self awareness in Heroes would make her character WORSE, not better lol. She's supposed to have some kind of morality yet can't hold her boyfriend accountable after literally dying for him? That'd be bullshit. Kids died because of Julius. It's only a problem if Ishtar randomly becomes recruitable in FE4R.
This video dude, literally what I'm thinking aswell
The people I've seen lately so desperately want an fe4 remake when the game doesn't even need one, it's better off left alone as is
The game doesn't need a remake at all because it's already GOOD, it's held up on its own for several years, and who knows? If it does get a remake, who's to say it won't butcher up the charm the game has?
This.
Fe4 is already a great game that doesn't need outlandish fixing, if they ported fe1, hopefully they can port a much more polished game like fe4.
Genealogy is in the same boat as Persona 3 imo
The game still stands on its own but a touch of modernization could make it incredible
I've already beaten FE4 multiple times on emulator with an english patch and even beat it one time through playing it on the switch online entirely in japanese without being able to read the language at all. I still want an FE4 remake because I want to enjoy experiencing the game again in a different way, and I don't really give a shit if they fuck up anything about it because I can just go play the original anyway. It would be fun to see all the characters redrawn in a modern style, and see how they adapt all the intricacies of it's gameplay. Plus there are tons of people who simply won't ever touch the SNES version no matter how often you tell them it's good, so they won't have the excuse of it being old any more. Honestly I don't really see how there is a downside to the game being remade, since you can just always play the old version if it is remade and you don't like what they did with it.
remakes are not the problem, its the quality and pricing of them. a remake thats basically a port should be 20, a remake that is a real remake that redoes the whole game with fresh and new graphex and small bits of added content or modern conveniences (or most remakes) should be 40 and if your ff7 that basically made a new game with its remake using only the main game as a starting point to expand on should be 60. remakes are fantastic as they make a way to update dated games with modern polish and allow new players to play games they couldn't before. however when it comes to a game like fe or srw, or really any srpg where you cant really add much, there should not be a remake, only ports, and the ports should be very cheep as game prices go down. i mean sega has sa1 and sa2 for like 5 usd, should be the same for old game ports
I would say the likes of Persona 1 may need one, the plot is fine but in retrospect it had a few weird things for a jrpg that would even look weird back then where you can only have 5 party members and your unable to switch them and if you recruit an optional character that's it you can't kick them out they are there for the remainder and this game roughly came out when FF allowed multiple characters to switch around with.
To top off both routes in P1 mostly have forced characters so there isn't much experimentation other than "should i pick a character who is great or who sucks". The story is good and p5r's third semester is clearly inspired by it however other than a very small fraction not many of the characters get their own spotlight and Maki dominates it, which the manga adaptation has lead to some people find it definitive storywise to look at that then the game which I have played and while my experience is fine it is quite flawed possibly even back then. P2 would later did some reworks and aged a bit better, the combat is a a bit on the wonky side and Eternal punishment is quite hard it's only P3 where the series's gameplay actually had a good momentum though with minor things that needed to be reworked which reload seem to have patched up
sadly i dont trust atlus to do a good remake because a remake should also be the definitive version of which reload is not as its missing both the fem c route from the psp and the answer from the updated version made on the original system. and if they cant get that right a p1 remake would have all the same flaws as the original and they would over price it like reload@@nightwish1453
Movies reuse scripts and adapt books in reboots all the time, its the same as that.
And often times many stories may have inferior versions (the studio deen adaptation of fate stay night compared to the visual novel), there's chances for mistakes to occur and I'd rather have less reused content in smth that I would've payed 40 to 60 quid for.
However the fe4 remake could be insane and I could be completely wrong so who knows.
Port it, localize it. Sell it. Nintendo won’t though because they are more anti consumer than they are pro-money.
Eh, I doubt it would sell that well in that state.
I don't agree with this video.
the idea that game companies are getting lazy, and your only point you've made is Sonic X Shadow Generations remake, which I have to assume means you think Remakes are lazy. I'll get more into that later.
your point on engage is a bit confusingly worded, you brought the mechanic of summoning old units, but you said nothing about it. did you like it? dislike it? you never followed up your statement and just called the story bad. unless your saying reused content is bad, which it isn't. unless its so reused that nothing original comes out, but engage summons are the second mainline to do this, the first being awakenings units.
"remakes are excuses for companies to resell content" is just wrong. Rereleases are reselling content, and that's not inherently a bad thing, though some companies do use it to just resell content. Remakes are different, where they not only have to recreate the game, but with most remakes, they fix and add changes. Look at echoes compared to gaiden. its night and day, Voice acting, amazing animations, some of the best music, and more characters. that story is improved(for the most part) so much, its disingenuous to imply its just reselling old content. there is still work put into remaking them. its not just releasing content over again.
your point on FE4, while yes its true that most people could just apply a patch and play a Translated Fe4 game. thats not the case for most people. some people may not see fan translations the same as official, or may not know how to apply patches. others could just not like emulating games. most people who play translated Fire emblem games Are already Fire emblem fans to begin with.
you seam confused. Echoes is not gaiden. they are 2 separate games, one is a remake, but they are 2 separate games. again, its disingenuous to imply its the same as gaiden.
I agree, people shoud play fire emblem 4, its a really fine game.
I don't have a problem with what your thinking, your able to have the opinion of whatever you want, but your reasons are just wrong and disingenuous, thats my only problem I have with it.
At this rate it would take less time for you a to learn Japanese and play it on the Switch Online Emulator (like I did)
You see i played in on the Nintendo switch online scripting service as well, but I just didn't know Japenese and I still somehow managed to beat the game.
Trial and error is one hell of a drug.
@@Finnland278 why not recommend that? It's not like Nintendo is gonna port or remake the game because people are pirating it
Remakes are good when it's about good games with dated gameplay and/or visual graphics.
Pop culture has been massively degraded since 1996. I hate seeing more and more of these remakes, and the idiots who lap them up. I want new games and sequels, not fe4 with ugly 3d graphics and censorship, with lets be honest inferior music to the snes original as well.
I think remakes r a bit of a trend that's kinda stupid, resources that could've been used to make new games r instead getting used up for stuff we've already seen and done before. Hopefully if less people buy em they'll get less popular and maybe we'd get more new content.
Yeah I would be absolutely pissed if the FE4 remake catered to the neckbeard virgin redditor waifu collectors. Which they will probably do. FE4 is an extremely serious game with very high stakes. No other game in the franchise compares. IS has shown that they don't know how to make serious games.
They will censor the shit out of the game. Make gay like 9 characters and make villlains "misunderstood" and make them recruitable (this is coming from someone with a Travant pfp) I agree. Let FE4 and FE5 be. They will ruin it.
Wait ur that same Travant pfp guy who was spreading misinformation about Ethlyn and Travant?
Jokes aside, yeah they're likely to censor the hell out of this game, I'm personally fine since the story changes can be looked up online for people who may play a botched version of the game. The recruiting characters would be very annoying tho I hope they don't add anything like that.
@@Finnland278 Yeah the same one. Lol. Ethlyn and Travant boned and nothing can change my mind
Depends on the director. Villains weren't recruited in SOV and nobody gave a shit about any of the chars from Gaiden until the remake.
Also like... half of the villains in FE4 were ALREADY "tragic and misunderstand" lmao. Julius is literally Garon to the point of us never seeing the real Julius and why anyone would care about this guy (Ishtar I'm looking at you)
What's the problem with gays?
I just want an FE4 remake so that the people who don't like fe4 because of "graphics" and "jank" and "underdeveloped characters" will realize they just had bad taste in games if they don't like fe4.
bUt iT tAkEs sO lOnG tO mOvE uNiTs and then they proceed to try the same turn 6 times in a row with Time's Pulse on normal mode
Problem is that they will censor the shit out of the game. Make every character recruitable. Maybe even make Julius hold hands with Seliph and make out with him at the secret final wholesome 100 ending because Fire Emblem babies who started with 3Hs can't tolerate a dark story. No thanks.