I'm actually not since I shoot with a Fujifilm X-t4 and have no clue what versatile lens to get or maybe an adapter for the lenses I already had for my canon 80D. If you have the answer that would be great!! 🥺😩
With 26 years experience as a photographer, mostly in the advertising space, I find that the 24-70 and the 70-200 are my Swiss Army Knives and this is what I have stuck to for about 15 years out of 26 years. Simply cannot go wrong with quality glass. I think that Sony, Canon and Nikon all make great professional glass and it's simply a matter of preference. All the best.
@@reneefariasphoto40 I was replying to Armaan that even if you cover that focal length aperture would vary for different lenses . The lens with bigger aperture comes with bigger price .
As a person who's recently started their first full time Design and Photography role, and upgrading from a canon 60d to a sony a7ii, whenever I do photography for work I keep that kit lens on because it is so versatile and all the photos look great for clients. Especially helps that I'm taking landscape shots essentially so my f/stop is always going to be fairly high for that tac sharp look. Still have a couple of primes though for my own little fun photography walks though
Since getting the RF 28-70 f2, I rarely use any other lens. Prime quality in a zoom, even at f2 it’s perfect wide range. Perfect all day, street, wedding, portrait lens. Probably best lens ever created in that regards. I also own a few others but this is the first zoom that convinced me zooms can be abbettele option than primes
I love my tamron 28-75. Used to really take the whole zoom with your feet philosophy to heart, but realized that I walk around a lot regardless of the lense. My eyes are always darting all over the place for compositions and I eventually got tired of having to play musical chairs because the specific prime I had wasn't what I needed. 135mm primes are pretty much the only ones I love with no question though lol.
If I had to choose... Thats hard.. been shooting mostly 50mm all my life, but I sometimes feel like it is too tight these days.. But I would probably still choose the 50.. Maybe I could live with 40mm as well.. ? I feel like a zoom keeps me from getting the best shots.. But we are all different!
I use both Prime and Zoom lenses simply for versatility. Zoom lenses never stopped me from moving around or getting creative, but they have helped me to be able to stand in one area and get different shots. Comes in handy when you're limited at where you can stand in a room or area. Also this was super informative and interesting to watch. First video I've ever seen of yours and I subscribed.
I've been using lately the 50mm 'cause I can get a deep background separation, a beautiful bokeh, close ups without distortion and with just a step I can get a full body angle. But it's hard to stay with only one lens. 35 + 85 or 24 + 50 is better to me.
I'm here for the vibe of the video, I literally love your setup, the background, the lighting of the video, the frames at the back. Soo pleasing to watch Audio quality is amazing too. Very inspiring.
Yeah… I am getting back on the horse after a decade long break. I went straight to the Nikon Z5 and the Nikkor Z 28-75 f2.8. Definitely the mid zooms (24-70/28-75) are an absolute must for someone looking to build a more diverse portfolio.
its heavy, and pain in the ass to carry around, i have it but it will make you see which focal length you shoot the most and then you can buy a prime that you will get the most use of...
I love prime lenses. I prefer to use only primes, not sure what it is. It's not the option for wider apertures (though that helps in certain situations), since I'm anyway often stop down, since I most often shoot architecture. BUT, the most used lens I've used has always been a 24-70mm zoom lens. Right now I'm shooting with Nikon and the 24-70mm f4 S is constantly on the camera. I'm saving for the 14-30mm f4 S, which might become the main lens, but with the 24-70mm I'm both able to do wide angle shots (even though I need to go even more wide than 24mm) and get detail shots. I also use it for my portraits, with the same issues, but still. It's just such an amazing zoom lens, which I'd almost always recommend people to get their hands on as soon as possible.
I just bought my first camera this week, and am taking baby steps. My kit lens is a 45mm 2.8.But because of this video; my first lens purchase is going to be a 24mm-70mm 2.8f. Thank You!!!! :D
I use the GF 45-100mm f4 for almost everything right now. It covers 80% from all my work and it's sharp like primes. And of course the 80mm f1.7 complements it in low light.
I've often wondered, Why do the manufacturers make & sell so many 24-70 Lenses, rather than 35-85 lenses?? There's not even a 70mm lens available and 24 is generally for landscapes!
I've been looking at the Black and white print out pictures on lizzie's right for most of the time😂...I don't know it's just Dope mehn 😁 also great video...the speech flows,well compared to your old videos back in 2018 😂😂😂 (I've been here quite so long 😂😂)
I finally got around to watching your video Lizzie and I 100% and beyond agree.... I LOVE my prime lenses but for versatility NOTHING beats my Tamron 24-70 F/2.8 lens. I have used to for portraits, in low light, products, landscapes, you name it. I LOVE my 24-70 and it literally lives on my Z7 unless I need a prime lens.
One note, you are just focusing on focal lengths coverage of the zoom, but not taking max aperture into consideration. We discuss 24-70, but on the video you are shooting primes. So, although all focal lenghts are covered by that zoom, results are not going to be the same as the prime lens.
Which one would you recommend for someone who just wants 1 lens. For me the most important thing is for faces to come out super sharp and professional like when traveling and for normal fam photos. Also, for travel purposes i don't want a huge lens.
I just did an upgrade to the lens kit too, I shoot canon and have just picked up the 18-150mm. After this video I feel like I've made a good choice. I know its not the same but the info from this was super helpful. Thanks Lizzie!
Getting the optimal focal length for a given scene/shot is probably going to be more valuable artistically than having that last bit of sharpness or less chromatic abberation, and no matter how much a prime will make you use your feet, you're still locked to the look of that one focal length. Zoom all day.
I agree, but only in a professional setting. In most other settings I think the benefits of prime lenses are far better than that of zooms. You lose some flexibility, but especially with vintage primes that have very low element counts and older coatings, pictures just look so much better. I really dislike how modern zooms (and some primes too) are so surgical about the details, giving poorer rendering of colours, or textures in the case of black and white. Also, with older primes, they're so small and light (and still so much better built than modern lenses) that it's easy to carry a couple and change lenses when needed.
@@rec11fdc It's great that you feel that way, let's change that! Is color rendition really that much worse in a good zoom these days, and are you referring to a workflow without any color correction in post? I'm mainly referring to the modern lenses that most people will end up choosing between (probably because they can autofocus), and I would personally not fault a lens for being surgical when it comes to rendering details. While I do agree that older primes can be small and light, there still remains the psychological hurdle of actually taking the time/effort to change the lens, and who's to say that the ideal field of view/compression for your shot coincides with the focal length of the few primes you have with you? I would say this applies to hobby photography as well, not just in a professional setting.
@@itswrongtokillanimalsifyou2837 Oh yes it is so much worse. It's about microcontrast, not much you can do about it in post either. Photos from decades ago lacked all the detail and colour correction of the photos we see today, and yet you look at them and you still see that "pop" they have even today. The "ideal field of view" is rarely an issue, 10mm (or more) longer or shorter in most cases will not make the difference between two pictures and on one of the sides you can always crop. I can change lenses in less than 30 seconds, and as a hobbyist I'm not pressured to grab every photo nor am I in a rush. As for it applying to the hobbyist I think you should take into account cost as well. I have 4 prime lenses and could get another 2 for the price of that 24-70. All these primes will last me a lifetime since there's no autofocus, stabilizing system or even zoom mechanism to break. So all in all, primes take better pictures, are smaller and are much more cost effective than zooms, in my opinion.
@@rec11fdc I doubt I could reliably pick out a MODERN zoom from a MODERN prime if subjected to an A/B test, especially after artistic post processing. I don't know about vintage lenses, but the discussions online lead me to believe that the effects of micro contrast are not clear enough in practice to be an uncontroversial subject in forums (many even call it a myth, though probably unfairly). It's probably not something I'd ever choose over having autofocus, so old lenses are off the table for me. I also hate having to change lenses (trying not to get dust in there, losing even 30 seconds, and keeping track of loose camera parts when I'm in the moment). And the cost is less of an argument if you're putting it up against modern primes with autofocus, as I believe most will. I've watched comparisons of (good) zooms vs primes on CZcams and not - even pixel peeping - found the best zooms lacking in sharpness or color, and that's what changed my opinion.
@@itswrongtokillanimalsifyou2837 Well, this is why I said in my opinion. I'm not trying to change yours like you are mine. Autofocus is redundant for me as I prefer to focus myself, and the weight and volume it adds to the lens is not worth it for me. The plasticky and overall bad construction of new lenses and especially zoom lenses, paired with the surgical look they give to photos makes me despise them. Being able to afford lenses is very important for me, plus I like the fact of not giving money to companies that are just doing things worse and worse, I'll just get the things they did when they did things right. So to each their own. I use what used to be top tier professional gear that professionals used for decades to create pictures famous to this day at a fraction of the price of modern zoom lenses. And I think that's what works for me. It doesn't have to work for you :)
24-70 f2.8 and 70-200 (f2.8 if you got the dough, f4-f6 otherwise) and you are set. 24-70 is good for a lot of things, but sometimes you just need that extra bit of reach.
I love the Tamron 35-150 2-2.8 sony e mount lens. Way more range than the 24-70 and just as fast of an aperture (a little faster on the wider end). Now THATS an all arounder.
maybe someday in the future, one company will manufacture a 24-70mm 1.4 lens which is not too big. It's impossible because it will kill the sales of tons of fixed lenses :)
Something that;s really fun for me is using cinema lenses for photography. its not practical or easy but it's a blast. I bet you'd have a good time trying it out. like, grab some Vespids or some Xeen CF's and go shoot some frames. Still frames, that is. Thoughts?
Thank you Lizzie! I am looking into my first camera the Sony A7iv but which lens to get is super confusing. This was very helpful and reduces my stress!
I just subbed Great content Im in two minds about buying fuji x100v or fuji xe4, having said that im just a beginner in the club What you suggest me to go with first ? Thanks in advance
Great video! I'm new to photography, with a Canon 90dD. Would you recommend any of the lenses listed, I have all of them except the 24-70mm and 25-70mm? 24-70mm, 28-75mm, 55-250mm, 24mm, 50mm. The 18-55mm came with the camera. I'm thinking about returning the 24mm and 50mm, and getting the 24-70mm or 28-75mm Tamron, what's your thoughts?
If you are using a 90D is not the same effect, bcuz she's talking all the time about full frame cameras (90d is APSC camera), and that means that if you start to use a 24-70 lens with your 1.6x cropped sensor, will really get a 38-112 lens, not so versatile for wide angle shots. But there's an option! I very love the Sigma Art 18-35 f1.8 , and his brother 50-100 f1.8 . Both are really sharp at f1.8 aperture and totally RAZOR sharp at f2.8 😍 With the 18-35 you will have, in fact, a 28-56. With the 50-100 you will have, in fact, a 80-160. The 90D is an excellent DSLR APSC cameras (maybe the best), and apsc doesn't have so much to envy to Full Frame in terms of crop factor. Enjoy taking pictures bro, and stay always positive and creative with your actual gear, one step at a time is the real key! 💪🏼📷
Best zoom lens every created. It’s crazy thinking what people are missing out when seeing all this exotic lenses canon keeps pushing out. Got the 85 f1.2 DS several months ago. This thing produces the best quality image I have ever seen
![Best PRIME LENS for STREET PHOTOGRAPHY? [24mm vs 35mm vs 50mm]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/bqyuSMhDizY/mqdefault.jpg)
Are we tired of me talking about lenses yet? Nah me neither.
Nahh, never. Hearing about lenses every now and then is a great exposure!😉
I'm actually not since I shoot with a Fujifilm X-t4 and have no clue what versatile lens to get or maybe an adapter for the lenses I already had for my canon 80D. If you have the answer that would be great!! 🥺😩
NEVER. It's really not helping my gear envy, but I love it. 😂
Nope, keep talking about them. Learn so much from both of you :)
@@HeauxHouseCreator 16-55 for fujifilm
With 26 years experience as a photographer, mostly in the advertising space, I find that the 24-70 and the 70-200 are my Swiss Army Knives and this is what I have stuck to for about 15 years out of 26 years. Simply cannot go wrong with quality glass. I think that Sony, Canon and Nikon all make great professional glass and it's simply a matter of preference. All the best.
24-70 and 70-200
Don't they cover all focal length someone might need??
The aperture would vary
@@shivamchandrol8641 What? "The aperture would vary" what does that mean.
@@reneefariasphoto40 I was replying to Armaan that even if you cover that focal length aperture would vary for different lenses . The lens with bigger aperture comes with bigger price .
@@shivamchandrol8641 got it
As a person who's recently started their first full time Design and Photography role, and upgrading from a canon 60d to a sony a7ii, whenever I do photography for work I keep that kit lens on because it is so versatile and all the photos look great for clients. Especially helps that I'm taking landscape shots essentially so my f/stop is always going to be fairly high for that tac sharp look. Still have a couple of primes though for my own little fun photography walks though
Since getting the RF 28-70 f2, I rarely use any other lens. Prime quality in a zoom, even at f2 it’s perfect wide range. Perfect all day, street, wedding, portrait lens. Probably best lens ever created in that regards.
I also own a few others but this is the first zoom that convinced me zooms can be abbettele option than primes
I love my tamron 28-75. Used to really take the whole zoom with your feet philosophy to heart, but realized that I walk around a lot regardless of the lense. My eyes are always darting all over the place for compositions and I eventually got tired of having to play musical chairs because the specific prime I had wasn't what I needed. 135mm primes are pretty much the only ones I love with no question though lol.
If I have to choose one lens in my lifetime, I’d take my 24-70 with me in a heartbeat!!
legit just bury me with it
If I had to choose... Thats hard.. been shooting mostly 50mm all my life, but I sometimes feel like it is too tight these days.. But I would probably still choose the 50.. Maybe I could live with 40mm as well.. ? I feel like a zoom keeps me from getting the best shots.. But we are all different!
true
I use both Prime and Zoom lenses simply for versatility. Zoom lenses never stopped me from moving around or getting creative, but they have helped me to be able to stand in one area and get different shots. Comes in handy when you're limited at where you can stand in a room or area.
Also this was super informative and interesting to watch. First video I've ever seen of yours and I subscribed.
I’ve wanted this lens for a long time! It’s still on my list! Thanks for the video!
Anytime!
I've been using lately the 50mm 'cause I can get a deep background separation, a beautiful bokeh, close ups without distortion and with just a step I can get a full body angle. But it's hard to stay with only one lens. 35 + 85 or 24 + 50 is better to me.
I recently got a 24-70 and I love it! It really is the swiss army knife of lens for almost any situation 🔥
I'm here for the vibe of the video, I literally love your setup, the background, the lighting of the video, the frames at the back. Soo pleasing to watch Audio quality is amazing too. Very inspiring.
Yeah… I am getting back on the horse after a decade long break. I went straight to the Nikon Z5 and the Nikkor Z 28-75 f2.8. Definitely the mid zooms (24-70/28-75) are an absolute must for someone looking to build a more diverse portfolio.
This is why I'm eyeing the Nikon Z 24-120 F4...it's not a 2.8 but the range and versatility is crazy.
I agree!
I gladly sacrifice 1 stop of light for more versatility. 24-105 f4 all day! Dual native ISO 🔥
I've been sitting here for hours, watching multiple videos and reading articles. I am now convinced that the 24-70 is for me. thanks!!
its heavy, and pain in the ass to carry around, i have it but it will make you see which focal length you shoot the most and then you can buy a prime that you will get the most use of...
I love prime lenses. I prefer to use only primes, not sure what it is. It's not the option for wider apertures (though that helps in certain situations), since I'm anyway often stop down, since I most often shoot architecture. BUT, the most used lens I've used has always been a 24-70mm zoom lens. Right now I'm shooting with Nikon and the 24-70mm f4 S is constantly on the camera. I'm saving for the 14-30mm f4 S, which might become the main lens, but with the 24-70mm I'm both able to do wide angle shots (even though I need to go even more wide than 24mm) and get detail shots. I also use it for my portraits, with the same issues, but still. It's just such an amazing zoom lens, which I'd almost always recommend people to get their hands on as soon as possible.
Thumbnail of the year. Very creative
I love the lense themes 😉 bought today my Sony 70-200 mm f4 for my FX6 🎥 best cinematic greetings from germany
I just bought my first camera this week, and am taking baby steps. My kit lens is a 45mm 2.8.But because of this video; my first lens purchase is going to be a 24mm-70mm 2.8f. Thank You!!!! :D
I use the GF 45-100mm f4 for almost everything right now. It covers 80% from all my work and it's sharp like primes. And of course the 80mm f1.7 complements it in low light.
My Sony 24-105 f4 is my most versatile lens. Behind that, my favorite lens is the Sony 24mm 1.4 GM
interesting that you love the 24 1.4 that much! Thats so cool
@@LizziePeirce more for video than photos.
I've watched A LOT of focal length vids over the years but your video made everything click. I had several lightbulb moments. 🖤🖤🖤
There can never be too much lens talk. Fun fact: my friends called me “lenses” for a few years 🤣
I love your channel name!
@@DerbyMods haha thank you! 😁
First time I see a photographer being prettier than the model :)
I've often wondered, Why do the manufacturers make & sell so many 24-70 Lenses, rather than 35-85 lenses?? There's not even a 70mm lens available and 24 is generally for landscapes!
FIrst positive person about zooming lenses :D FInally!
While i agree the 24-70 amazingly versatile, it can't replace a 50mm simply because they don't match in depth, both are great lenses.
Thank u so much for this video !!!!!! I needed this to understand lenses 😅 and ive had the hardest time. Im super new to this so THANK U!!!!
this is such an "ePIC" analysis on the different types of lenses there are out there! LOL :P keep it up! 🙏
I've been looking at the Black and white print out pictures on lizzie's right for most of the time😂...I don't know it's just Dope mehn 😁 also great video...the speech flows,well compared to your old videos back in 2018 😂😂😂 (I've been here quite so long 😂😂)
Finally 🙌🏻 a comprehensive and practical post about the 24-70mm lens 👏🏻 thanks a lot, lizzie !!! See ya, blue skies 🍀📷
Anytime!
I finally got around to watching your video Lizzie and I 100% and beyond agree.... I LOVE my prime lenses but for versatility NOTHING beats my Tamron 24-70 F/2.8 lens. I have used to for portraits, in low light, products, landscapes, you name it. I LOVE my 24-70 and it literally lives on my Z7 unless I need a prime lens.
You are right. 👍
I’m a street photographer and I love two lenses. Prime lens and 55-250mm.
I appreciate anyone who shows some love to my channel ❤️🙏
You're so cute anyways in all lenses ❤🥺
One note, you are just focusing on focal lengths coverage of the zoom, but not taking max aperture into consideration. We discuss 24-70, but on the video you are shooting primes. So, although all focal lenghts are covered by that zoom, results are not going to be the same as the prime lens.
Which one would you recommend for someone who just wants 1 lens. For me the most important thing is for faces to come out super sharp and professional like when traveling and for normal fam photos. Also, for travel purposes i don't want a huge lens.
Thumbnail 👌🏿
I've been trying to get a Tamron 35-150 but it's out of stock pretty much everywhere here in Belgium
I just did an upgrade to the lens kit too, I shoot canon and have just picked up the 18-150mm. After this video I feel like I've made a good choice. I know its not the same but the info from this was super helpful. Thanks Lizzie!
Great choice. It's gonna be a staple
Great rant
I like the way you broke the focal lengths down.
Getting the optimal focal length for a given scene/shot is probably going to be more valuable artistically than having that last bit of sharpness or less chromatic abberation, and no matter how much a prime will make you use your feet, you're still locked to the look of that one focal length.
Zoom all day.
I agree, but only in a professional setting. In most other settings I think the benefits of prime lenses are far better than that of zooms. You lose some flexibility, but especially with vintage primes that have very low element counts and older coatings, pictures just look so much better. I really dislike how modern zooms (and some primes too) are so surgical about the details, giving poorer rendering of colours, or textures in the case of black and white. Also, with older primes, they're so small and light (and still so much better built than modern lenses) that it's easy to carry a couple and change lenses when needed.
@@rec11fdc It's great that you feel that way, let's change that!
Is color rendition really that much worse in a good zoom these days, and are you referring to a workflow without any color correction in post? I'm mainly referring to the modern lenses that most people will end up choosing between (probably because they can autofocus), and I would personally not fault a lens for being surgical when it comes to rendering details.
While I do agree that older primes can be small and light, there still remains the psychological hurdle of actually taking the time/effort to change the lens, and who's to say that the ideal field of view/compression for your shot coincides with the focal length of the few primes you have with you?
I would say this applies to hobby photography as well, not just in a professional setting.
@@itswrongtokillanimalsifyou2837 Oh yes it is so much worse. It's about microcontrast, not much you can do about it in post either. Photos from decades ago lacked all the detail and colour correction of the photos we see today, and yet you look at them and you still see that "pop" they have even today. The "ideal field of view" is rarely an issue, 10mm (or more) longer or shorter in most cases will not make the difference between two pictures and on one of the sides you can always crop. I can change lenses in less than 30 seconds, and as a hobbyist I'm not pressured to grab every photo nor am I in a rush. As for it applying to the hobbyist I think you should take into account cost as well. I have 4 prime lenses and could get another 2 for the price of that 24-70. All these primes will last me a lifetime since there's no autofocus, stabilizing system or even zoom mechanism to break. So all in all, primes take better pictures, are smaller and are much more cost effective than zooms, in my opinion.
@@rec11fdc I doubt I could reliably pick out a MODERN zoom from a MODERN prime if subjected to an A/B test, especially after artistic post processing.
I don't know about vintage lenses, but the discussions online lead me to believe that the effects of micro contrast are not clear enough in practice to be an uncontroversial subject in forums (many even call it a myth, though probably unfairly). It's probably not something I'd ever choose over having autofocus, so old lenses are off the table for me.
I also hate having to change lenses (trying not to get dust in there, losing even 30 seconds, and keeping track of loose camera parts when I'm in the moment).
And the cost is less of an argument if you're putting it up against modern primes with autofocus, as I believe most will.
I've watched comparisons of (good) zooms vs primes on CZcams and not - even pixel peeping - found the best zooms lacking in sharpness or color, and that's what changed my opinion.
@@itswrongtokillanimalsifyou2837 Well, this is why I said in my opinion. I'm not trying to change yours like you are mine. Autofocus is redundant for me as I prefer to focus myself, and the weight and volume it adds to the lens is not worth it for me. The plasticky and overall bad construction of new lenses and especially zoom lenses, paired with the surgical look they give to photos makes me despise them. Being able to afford lenses is very important for me, plus I like the fact of not giving money to companies that are just doing things worse and worse, I'll just get the things they did when they did things right. So to each their own. I use what used to be top tier professional gear that professionals used for decades to create pictures famous to this day at a fraction of the price of modern zoom lenses. And I think that's what works for me. It doesn't have to work for you :)
Thank you. I'm just getting started and this short video gave me an idea
So you dont rebalance when you extend from 24 to 70 or better yet the tamron 150? The center of gravity changes. Gymbal = prime for efficiency.
A lens that's great 👍🔥🙌
24-70 f2.8 and 70-200 (f2.8 if you got the dough, f4-f6 otherwise) and you are set. 24-70 is good for a lot of things, but sometimes you just need that extra bit of reach.
I love the Tamron 35-150 2-2.8 sony e mount lens. Way more range than the 24-70 and just as fast of an aperture (a little faster on the wider end). Now THATS an all arounder.
Great thumbnail
I recognize that sweatshirt anywhere 😉
maybe someday in the future, one company will manufacture a 24-70mm 1.4 lens which is not too big. It's impossible because it will kill the sales of tons of fixed lenses :)
how do you light your studio?
Loveeee this. Thank you
Yes! I have the Tamron!
Thank you. Very helpful!
24-70/2.8“ GM II is coming soon, so don’t rush to the next store yet. Better wait for version 2 later this year. According to sonyalpharumors. ;)
sneaky sneakyyyyyyyy i can neither confirm or deny
Nice one!
Iam 1st, view, like , comment,,,Love from Bangladesh 💝,,,, you looking lovely Today!
Recently came across your channel. Awesome job! Newly subscribed today!💕
I got that Tamron 28-75 ... it is my favorite lens
This is an amazing video, thank for the efforts
Something that;s really fun for me is using cinema lenses for photography. its not practical or easy but it's a blast. I bet you'd have a good time trying it out. like, grab some Vespids or some Xeen CF's and go shoot some frames. Still frames, that is. Thoughts?
Interesting! I'd be open to it!
Primarily shoot 50 1.2 / 105 1.4 love it! My partner shoots 24 70 for everything
Wedding processionals have been using a 24-70 2.8 for over 20 tears.
Thanks so much lizzie, great content
This was great 😊
thanks for the explanations ! 👏👏
Hello all! What would be the versatile Lens for Nikon?
Very helpful video
a single lens for portrait and landscape photography ,which lens is you prefer
What about using a crop sensor dslr…would you still recommend the 24-70?
24-70 ff will translate to around 18-50 for apsc.
Apsc kit lenses typically cover this range: 15-45 or 18-55 are common.
Lizzie du är snygg.☺
Thanks for the vid!😍 what about APSC Sony Cameras lenses? What would you recommend? Thank you!
how about the sharpness of the resulting photo when compared to a fixed lens
I could do that in a future video - cool idea!
I am one who is limited by the lens I have at my disposal ..I just have the ole 16-55 and work that the best possible way i can 💋
Good 👍 work , useful video I have the lens but I don’t know how to use it , thank you 🙏
Should try the tameron 35-150mm f2-2.8.
I have my Canon L 24 1.4 and 50 1.2 but hands down my biggest money maker for event/concert photography was my f4 24-105L
oooo I can see that. You need those tight shots of the performers and can't always get that close
I always think I would like to have a 24-70 just havn't decided to do so yet. Great video!
Thanks Derek!
@@LizziePeirce zeiss is good lens?
Chrisssssss
Thank you Lizzie! I am looking into my first camera the Sony A7iv but which lens to get is super confusing. This was very helpful and reduces my stress!
I have a Sony A7IV, and use the Sigma 24-70, it's a great lens and works well for landscapes as well as people/studio.
@@richardnicholson6465 same here A7iii with sigma 24-70
I just subbed
Great content
Im in two minds about buying fuji x100v or fuji xe4, having said that im just a beginner in the club
What you suggest me to go with first ?
Thanks in advance
Anamorphic..Have you done any filming with one of those?
24mm is a bit too tight for vlog 😂😂😂 any good lens recommendations for 20-70mm or 16-70mm with fixed aperture at/below 2.8?
Can I use this lens for my Sony a5100?
So I'm guessing the 24-70 GM II is right around the corner, huh?
" One lens to rule them all "
i went for 24-105 f4. f4 is pretty shallow on ff anyway.
What about the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8? I have been considering getting that one.
Get it! Arguably better than the GM in many ways
Great video!
I'm new to photography, with a Canon 90dD. Would you recommend any of the lenses listed, I have all of them except the 24-70mm and 25-70mm? 24-70mm, 28-75mm, 55-250mm, 24mm, 50mm. The 18-55mm came with the camera. I'm thinking about returning the 24mm and 50mm, and getting the 24-70mm or 28-75mm Tamron, what's your thoughts?
If you are using a 90D is not the same effect, bcuz she's talking all the time about full frame cameras (90d is APSC camera), and that means that if you start to use a 24-70 lens with your 1.6x cropped sensor, will really get a 38-112 lens, not so versatile for wide angle shots.
But there's an option! I very love the Sigma Art 18-35 f1.8 , and his brother 50-100 f1.8 . Both are really sharp at f1.8 aperture and totally RAZOR sharp at f2.8 😍 With the 18-35 you will have, in fact, a 28-56. With the 50-100 you will have, in fact, a 80-160.
The 90D is an excellent DSLR APSC cameras (maybe the best), and apsc doesn't have so much to envy to Full Frame in terms of crop factor. Enjoy taking pictures bro, and stay always positive and creative with your actual gear, one step at a time is the real key! 💪🏼📷
@@pabloalvaradolopez3941 Thanks for responding, I greatly appreciate your advice.
I like how her eyes disappear when she do happy talking 😊
28mm .. 🚶♂️
Can you make a video how to use the lens with settings?
What do you think of the sigma 24-105 vs the 24-70 ?
When’s the 24-70 GM II coming out?!?!
Man I wish I knewwwwwwww. And low key if the told me I gotta sign an NDA so that sucks haha
Verrygood
I have a 24-105 but rarely use it. Even considered switching it for the new 16-35pz f4 as I use my 90mm macro for everything lol
now that's a first! 90mm macro for everything. Now I wanna see your portfolio haha
@@LizziePeirce you'll be the first to know once I finish picking and editing everything for public scrutiny 😂
The Sony 24-70 f/2.8 was way out of my budget so i went for its little brother, the Sony 24-70 f/4.
Zoom has more versatiliy, but good primes gives that extra, that zoom do not have and never will.
Which camera do you use ?
You cant zoom with a prime but you can move forward or back. Zoom are convent but with the Canon RF 28-70 f-2 its like having a prime... ..;)>
Wait until you come to Canonland and try a 28-70 f2 🙃
Best zoom lens every created. It’s crazy thinking what people are missing out when seeing all this exotic lenses canon keeps pushing out. Got the 85 f1.2 DS several months ago. This thing produces the best quality image I have ever seen
@@Seitenwerk And for only 7000 euro you can have both lenses. Just about twice the median montly income.