Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Full class: Žižek’s most difficult idea + my theory of CHIASM
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 08. 2024
- Hi guys! Just so you know, my ebook is still available for another 2 weeks, exclusively for patrons. After that we’ll be releasing the next one, based on these most recent classes! Visit: www.patreon.com/jenalineandjulian
Also, if you’re curious about how I came up with the chiasmic theory and would like a brief introduction to dialectics for beginners, we recorded that as a bonus podcast for patrons. Available right now only on patreon!
.
Thanks to everyone joining us from around the world and helping us keep this crazy dream alive! Wet so grateful to be able to host these classes open access and want to keep doing it for as long as possible. So a huuuge thank you to our patrons and fellow students watching these videos!
Keep thinking like you mean it!
JXJ
#zizek #slavojzizek #hegel #lacan #marxism
Will never understand Hegel. 3 years of philosophy. Will never understand.
Very awesome explanation. Thank you for this.
From a derrida/foucault stan in FR.
This is such an awesome lecture! These videos rock!
flabbergasted (barely have an excuse to use that word but certainly can use it here!) the chiasmatic sequencing explanation is truly brilliant. thanks Julian
You're great at clarifying these ideas. I wish these philosophers were better communicators/writers because even though you're summarizing these concepts very well, their philosophy is so grossly overlycomplicated that it unfortunately has doomed recent generations into a position of having to misunderstand their ideas because it's obvious these thinkers didn't understand their own work in the first place. I hope future philosophers value clarity and feed more off of biology and physics and less so from psychology and the social sciences. Great video, I'm subscribing and recommending to friends.
you can only polish shit so much
I think that's the part of the charm of philosophy that you need to have 2 types of people - one capable of thinking extraordinary ideas, and other ones that are great at explaining and clarifying them to the public. And I doubt in the entire history of philosophy, there is a person that was both of them simultaneously.
@@bartomiej3389 I don't think there's any reason to assume these traits can't exist within the same person
@@bartomiej3389 thomas sowell
@@bartomiej3389 there have been so many, i think most philosophers are able to do so but they are just adressing other people than you think, one need to read to their books, in most case way easiert to follow than a speech since a speech is often to dense
Hi Julian, thanks for this class. Are you familiar with the later works of Merleau-Ponty? He is very close to Zizek and proposes the same chiasmic relationship of subjectivity and Being that you introduce here (as well as a chiasmic intertwining of all of the other conceptual oppositions--e.g. absence and presence, Being and nothingness, nature and culture, past and present, self and other, identity and difference, etc.). His late thought combines Hegel (and not Kojeve's Hegel of synthesis, but the Hegel of contradiction and constitutive negativity), Schelling, Lukacs, and psychoanalysis, and therefore reaches many of the same conclusions as Zizek
If you’d like to download the ebook, it’s available for a limited time only on patreon: www.patreon.com/jenalineandjulian
This makes me less afraid opening Hegel's book.
Powerful lecture! I wonder if there's a way of extending agency towards other nonhuman animals in a way that doesn't bake in the conclusion that man is unnatural in nature. Aristotle's account seems like a retroactive justification for a civilisation which has excluded consideration (moral or otherwise) to nonhuman animals
Keep up the good work guys!
Hello from Houston, TX
Julian, I didn't understand much of that, but i love your smile.
I love it when you use examples, even if they are a fruitful failure to express oneself. I'm understanding the chiasmic structure by contrasting a coin with a modified book. A coin has two sides, face up represents essence, face down is the void and the middle represents subjective being). Instead, we can imagine a book splayed open, with 'Nothing emerging into Something' on one page, and 'from Something into Nothing' on the other. Two metaphysical models. Yet, these are only on the page because in the middle of the spine stands a projector or mirror. The mirror reflects both models back into themselves. The mirror shows the wider dialectic of presence and absence. It reflects the order of being. My confusion lies in understanding how this mirror is also subjectivity and the Real
This really helped 💯
So glad!
Question. Been thinking of the of the CHAISM structure, can't quite understand but the idea of Lacanian quilting or retroactivity seems to play in here were the x stands in between the A-B B-A structure. Thinking seems to be here at the X is were all the show seems to be taking place. Not sure if question is clelar there but would Love to here if I'm crazy or something there?
Much Love
Absolutely! This is essentially why Zizek uses Lacan to read Hegel and in my reading the CHIASM achieves the same without needing Lacan (alrhough it took me Lacan to see the CHIASM)
@@julianphilosophy Thanks for helping getting a grasp of these concepts. Thanks for you and Jenaline BRILLIANT work, what a team. Every week the journey along with yall and the class have been joy to participate in and expand and explore my world and mind.
a - b - x - b - a, is your basic structure. but doesn't that imply that a=a and b=b? which of course cannot be true.
Hi 👋 can I quote you in my manifesto? It relates to an unattributed work by vladimir nabokov.
Brilliant idea to have one person halfway out of frame. 😅
Hi, guys from India.
Can you please make a short guide video on the concept you guys are coming up with for all the lessons, thanks.
Hi deep purple, greetings from us to you in India. We’ve uploaded 35 short masterclass videos to our patreon, each of them covers the key concepts for the classes. And some of the older ones might still be on CZcams as well. Thanks for asking!
Didn't understand anything, great lecture
Wait what!?!?!........ Clopen sets are here as well
Just looked this up. Very interesting!
God tells Moses I will be who I will be in I am/difference
NJ 08876
The whole is the hole
You lost me at the end of this one.
because it's dumb and doesnt make sense. read kant or wittgenstein
@@low_vibration I watch mainly for entertainment. I don't take it too seriously.
Zizek pinched these ideas from quantum mechanics and watching Matrix
Have you never heard of Derrida?
Or for that matter, Haegel?
From my comment it should be obvious that I've heard of those two plus Diogenes.
Alain de Botton not obvious but lieder ist er nicht eine echte Philosoph and doesn't count.
is it a part of your philosophy to look like you are hungover and rolled out of bed into a pile of grease when you turn the camera on
lmao have you even seen how real people look like. Go outside
What if this knowledge was useful?
history has shown us that it plainly isnt
It's not.