The difference between the pop stars and the new Millennium compared to the 1900s (yes, really! The 1900s) is that today's stars have either nothing or everything to say that yesteryear have something to say. When you have something to say, you are much more inclined to speak. Hence why we still dig older music. Hence why we really, underneath, still hanker after the popular, even traditional, song. In the internet age, we too often get ahead of ourselves, stomp and stamp, and try to be all things to all people (the "say everythings"). But when that gets too much, that tactic can disintegrate and all we end up in too much humdrum, mind-numbing moments are the "say nothings" ('carried' by their unhealthy, constantly flickering videos). "The Screamers" or "The Mumblers" - that's what pop music is like today. Either of these two camps seems only possible to transmit indecipherable stuff. We are pleased to announce that we are pleased to announce that we are pleased to announce that we are pleased to welcome you to our website. gate lounge? Well, no. We derive nothing and nothing from it all. In the old days, the stars could pick a feeling, a mood, a style - and make it universally felt. They had something to say. And they wanted to delight you in their telling of it. Popular music, that is pop music, was therefore inherently more democratic in the olden times. Young performers today need to have belief in themselves. They need to be proud of what they have been doing since the 1890s. how they would sound. And in English. But they gave it their best shot. They made it worth their while - and here is the key: they made it worth everybody else's while too. That took courage and self-belief. They were not interested in forming cliques of fans. They ended up universally loved. They did not want to miss the opportunities they offered themselves and they did not want to be in the grumble and mumble about missed opportunities. So they played to their newly discovered strengths, not found till their late 20s. The buzz of the internet age may cajole budding artists today into believing they are 'taking the opportunities'. But what is the product? What is it really? Is it charming? Is it witty? Those are the most important questions in this world today artists should ask themselves. I think anyway I talked a lot. I subscribed to you. Subscribe to my channel at send
I saw them at market square arena in 81 and 82 and 83 ....in front of 20,000 ppl.....( awesome) by 87 they played the vogue... a nightclub that holds about 1,000 ppl....sad
Best cranked 14" JBL song of all time
Esses caras sao foda❤
TELEGRAMM....THE OPENER OF EVERY NAZARETH CONCERTS❗
The difference between the pop stars and the new Millennium compared to the 1900s (yes, really! The 1900s) is that today's stars have either nothing or everything to say that yesteryear have something to say.
When you have something to say, you are much more inclined to speak. Hence why we still dig older music. Hence why we really, underneath, still hanker after the popular, even traditional, song.
In the internet age, we too often get ahead of ourselves, stomp and stamp, and try to be all things to all people (the "say everythings"). But when that gets too much, that tactic can disintegrate and all we end up in too much humdrum, mind-numbing moments are the "say nothings" ('carried' by their unhealthy, constantly flickering videos).
"The Screamers" or "The Mumblers" - that's what pop music is like today. Either of these two camps seems only possible to transmit indecipherable stuff. We are pleased to announce that we are pleased to announce that we are pleased to announce that we are pleased to welcome you to our website. gate lounge?
Well, no. We derive nothing and nothing from it all.
In the old days, the stars could pick a feeling, a mood, a style - and make it universally felt. They had something to say. And they wanted to delight you in their telling of it. Popular music, that is pop music, was therefore inherently more democratic in the olden times. Young performers today need to have belief in themselves. They need to be proud of what they have been doing since the 1890s. how they would sound. And in English. But they gave it their best shot. They made it worth their while - and here is the key: they made it worth everybody else's while too. That took courage and self-belief. They were not interested in forming cliques of fans. They ended up universally loved. They did not want to miss the opportunities they offered themselves and they did not want to be in the grumble and mumble about missed opportunities. So they played to their newly discovered strengths, not found till their late 20s.
The buzz of the internet age may cajole budding artists today into believing they are 'taking the opportunities'. But what is the product? What is it really? Is it charming? Is it witty? Those are the most important questions in this world today artists should ask themselves. I think
anyway I talked a lot. I subscribed to you. Subscribe to my channel at send
I saw them twice back in the day, including the 81 tour. I always thought they jammed.
Super
RIP Dan
RIP Manny 😢
Great rock'n'roll band!
ШИК!!
I saw them at market square arena in 81 and 82 and 83 ....in front of 20,000 ppl.....( awesome) by 87 they played the vogue... a nightclub that holds about 1,000 ppl....sad
great tour. great memories. thanks.
Love it!!!!
Just great
just in time all we are changing to TELEGRAM instead of Whatsapp ...