Wold you say the image from a 24-70 S pro 2.8 is noticeably worse to you? Or do you just prefer the shallower depth of field and the extra bit of range on both ends? I'm thinking in terms of convenience as it's tough carrying three lenses around all the time.
Hey, I mean, if you're traveling and you just want to have one lens to be able to quickly react and not change lenses all the time, you could definitely go for a lens like the 24-70. Pretty sure you can get amazing footage with this too. I'm just so used to prime lenses. They are also pretty light to carry, and with the extra push in quality (sharpness and bokeh), I always find myself coming back to prime lenses (especially for the videos that I do). But if I were to go for a hike next time, I would definitely grab a lens where I could adjust the focal length. So, I guess it always depends on the content you want to produce.
@@ThiloWitting Thanks so much for your answer :) Much appreciated. Your framing is really beautiful. One more question! I saw a video by Tony Northrup where he had the S52 pointed at himself and vlogged as he walked from an area which was brightly lit to an area which was poorly lit within his own house, and the auto exposure didn't keep up with the change in light at all. It wasn't able to shift and correctly expose his face in real time. Have you noticed this issue? It's the only proper flaw I've seen so far. I only ask as would need that changing autoexposure sometimes.
We hope the video was helpful and provided you with some new ideas. Which lens is your favorite so far? 👀
matter of time until this account gets the reach it deserves! The quality and value is just so good 🔥🔥🔥 Let’s go broski!
Thanks, broski LFG🌴
totally agree with you, 50mm is great to start with and really helps improving your skills
Yeah it’s such a great lens. Thanks for sharing 🎥
Good stuff. What about the Sigma primes btw? Did you try/consider those before?
Wold you say the image from a 24-70 S pro 2.8 is noticeably worse to you? Or do you just prefer the shallower depth of field and the extra bit of range on both ends? I'm thinking in terms of convenience as it's tough carrying three lenses around all the time.
Hey, I mean, if you're traveling and you just want to have one lens to be able to quickly react and not change lenses all the time, you could definitely go for a lens like the 24-70. Pretty sure you can get amazing footage with this too.
I'm just so used to prime lenses. They are also pretty light to carry, and with the extra push in quality (sharpness and bokeh), I always find myself coming back to prime lenses (especially for the videos that I do). But if I were to go for a hike next time, I would definitely grab a lens where I could adjust the focal length. So, I guess it always depends on the content you want to produce.
@@ThiloWitting Thanks so much for your answer :) Much appreciated. Your framing is really beautiful. One more question! I saw a video by Tony Northrup where he had the S52 pointed at himself and vlogged as he walked from an area which was brightly lit to an area which was poorly lit within his own house, and the auto exposure didn't keep up with the change in light at all. It wasn't able to shift and correctly expose his face in real time. Have you noticed this issue? It's the only proper flaw I've seen so far. I only ask as would need that changing autoexposure sometimes.