"Ancient DNA and the Peopling of the Americas" - Prof. Jennifer Raff

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 25. 06. 2024
  • presented by J. Robert Oppenheimer Committee

Komentáře • 36

  • @mcawesomest1
    @mcawesomest1 Před 14 dny +3

    About 10-15 years ago DNA was done on some ancient remains in Arizona gathered from multiple sites
    When the preliminary results were released to the local tribe they immediately sued ASU to block the release of the DNA findings.
    This was an odd reaction by the local tribal authorities because they were working conjointly with ASU prior to the DNA results coming back.
    It was rumored around ASU that the results were unexpected as to the ancestral heritage of burials and that it didn’t match with the “political correct” story that is broadcasted across North America.
    The tribe was successful in the court case and ASU was required to turn over EVERYTHING in relation to the investigation. Reports, samples, computer data, and files. They were forbidden by the courts to release anything In relation to the DNA heritage of the findings

    • @WarAndFame
      @WarAndFame Před 13 dny +1

      Havasupai vs ASU? Seems like you’re right. The tribe ok’d it and provided samples for diabetes research and wider areas. Geneticists compared it to archaeological remains(which is helpful in understanding current genetic diseases and how they developed). Then the tribe sued them and they settled for 700,000 dollars. I wonder if it’s possible to find out what the remains turned up.

  • @cacogenicist
    @cacogenicist Před 13 dny +4

    It is _entirely_ possible that the folks in New Mexico 20+ kya were not direct ancestors of extant indigenous Americans. There could have been a very small, very early population, that was subsequently replaced, without the earlier people having made a detectable genetic contribution to modern populations. This explanation is consistent with the genetic evidence as far as I can, but frequently seems to be all but dismissed by some academics in the field -- for, as far as I can tell, _political_ rather than scientific reasons.
    Also, we now have a reliable human occupation date in Eastern Oregon at ~18kya -- certainly there were people here prior to 18kya.

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Před 17 dny +1

    very educational and inspiring ... so much to yet learn about what we are to be human

  • @TomSchuster-u7b
    @TomSchuster-u7b Před 23 dny +5

    20 minutes waffle and apologies. I give up

  • @michaelterrien1649
    @michaelterrien1649 Před 15 dny +4

    Almost 14 minutes in and still waiting for the lecture. You can skip the two introductions and the land acknowledgements if that's not what you're here for. The actual lecture starts at the 14:30 point.

    • @PecosChico
      @PecosChico Před 2 dny

      Too much background and table setting. I'd be dead before you get through beating around the bush.

  • @democraticman3602
    @democraticman3602 Před 25 dny +3

    Waffle up to 30 mins into lecture, clovis is primary school stuff. We now know clovis are not first people.

  • @clareryan3843
    @clareryan3843 Před 25 dny +11

    TEN MINUTES 😩🤦 of waffle at the start of this before the lecture starts😳 you are warned😂

  • @MrCropper
    @MrCropper Před 14 dny

    7:20 is the start

  • @zipperpillow
    @zipperpillow Před 22 dny +2

    Not worth enduring. I could give a more informative and more concise lecture on this topic than she has.

  • @johnthekeane
    @johnthekeane Před 8 dny

    20 minutes... get to it!

  • @TheCadborosaurus
    @TheCadborosaurus Před 2 hodinami

    Came for science. Just heard dogmatic garbage.

  • @frankhamilton673
    @frankhamilton673 Před 19 dny +2

    A lot of woke nonsense. Why not follow the method of David Reich

    • @hardheadjarhead
      @hardheadjarhead Před 14 dny +4

      This isn’t his area. The “Indians” he deals with are from South Asia, not natives from America. And she is “woke” because she and her colleagues try to respect Native American sensibilities? Why is that bad? Or can you just not handle a woman being top in her field?
      “Woke”. Jesus. I’m not even sure you know what that word means.

  • @JungleJargon
    @JungleJargon Před 21 dnem +2

    The majority of Native Americans migrated from the Mediterranean to Central America and spread out from there. The exceptions are the Inuits and the B maternal lineage that seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean.
    People are ignoring actual known human history. The actual historical records and DNA migrations show that everyone spread out from Mesopotamia. Ancient history is essential for everyone to know, especially the sixteen original civilizations… from the sixteen grandsons of Noah. Learn ancient history before trying to learn science.
    1. The first inhabitants of Italy (K) Tubal
    2. Thracians (L) Tiras
    3. Mediterranean Greek sea people (T) Javan
    4. Siberians (N) Meshek
    5. East Asians (O) Magog
    6. Medes (PQ) Madai
    7. Western Europeans (R) Gomer
    8. Hebrews and Arabic (IJ) Arphaxad
    9. Elamites (H) Elam
    10. Assyrians (G) Asshur
    11. Arameans (F1) Aram
    12. Lydians (F2) Lud
    13. Cushites (AB, C) Cush
    14. Egyptians (E3) Mitzrayim
    15. Canaanites (E2, D) Canaan
    16. Original North African Phoenicians (E1) Phut
    The D paternal haplogroup Sino descendants of Canaan migrated from Canaan east to China all the way to Japan and Tibet. The C paternal haplogroup descendants of Nimrod migrated as far as South Asia, the Pacific, Mongolia and all the way to the Americas accounting for the Olmec civilization as well as the Q haplogroup descendants of Madai ancestor of the Medes that crossed the Atlantic to Central America.
    The A maternal mtDNA haplogroup belonging to the Semitic N lineage accompanied the Eurasian Q paternal haplogroup to Central America. The C&D maternal haplogroups belonging to the Eurasian M lineage also accompanied the Atlantic crossing of the Q paternal haplogroup Medes and probably the C paternal haplogroup to Central America. The Semitic B maternal mtDNA haplogroup seems to have crossed the Pacific Ocean to South America.
    The Mediterranean paternal R1b and the maternal X2a also found in Galilee represent another Atlantic crossing of the Phoenicians in the days of King Solomon considering also the Mediterranean paternal haplogroups of T, G, I1, I2, J1, J2, E and B in addition to the R1b in Native American Populations. J1 and J2 is Arabs and Jews. (I1 is most likely Dan and I2 resembles the movements of the tribe of Asher)
    Of course there is also the Cohen modal haplotype of J1 P58 as well which identifies the IJ lineage of Hebrews and Arabs that are descended from Arphaxad. J2 M172 is the largest group of descendants probably of the House of the kings David and Solomon. Now you know a lot more of what is verified human history.

    • @forrestgossett
      @forrestgossett Před 13 dny +2

      Ridiculous.

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon Před 13 dny

      @@forrestgossett You have a few things to learn.

    • @WarAndFame
      @WarAndFame Před 13 dny +1

      @@JungleJargonyou certainly know some things. Now if you can at least associate some chronological order of events and dates it might be worth looking at

    • @JungleJargon
      @JungleJargon Před 13 dny

      @@WarAndFame The dates are also known as well as some of the actual genealogies. The actual migrations of the haplogroups are also known. (Hint: the claims of 20,000 years or so don’t hold up.)

    • @magdalenadelmar6890
      @magdalenadelmar6890 Před 12 dny

      No Do you studied at Trump University for any chance?