My Conclusion to Sadhguru, Why Guru Rinpoche is Buddhist! V.2
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 04. 2022
- In nutshell, for that answer, Many Vajrayana Masters have their Tantric consort and you will commonly see trident in Vajrayana Buddhist Ritual Practice.
jst example: The famous Yogi Milarepa’s Master Merpa has his Tantric Consort.
And Trident represent Buddha teachings on ethics, meditation and wisdom.
And He said Guru Rinpoche is mystic: That is possible, and mystic can be in any religion.
Yes, Tibetan Buddhist enshrine Guru Rinpche because he taught Buddha’s Teaching.
Guru's Teachings;
levekunst.com/the-final-words...
/ advice-from-the-lotus-... - Krátké a kreslené filmy
This is not fight nor offensive, simply defending from external force. You will feel the pain only if you have preserved Guru Rinpoche's Teachings for nearly last 10 to 15 centuries. And now, somebody just pop up n say whatever they want. Are you expecting us to simply close our eyes and ear and say you are most welcome to destroy it?
True. Sadh lost his mind
Nobody can destroy the Truth. There is nothing to defend. If Guru Rinpoche's reputation can be that easily destroyed then it is not worth defending. Guru Rinpoche is my refuge. I have unshakable faith, and belief in him and nothing anyone says can turn me away from him. Let them say whatever they want, they have the right. It doesn't change anything at all, from Guru Rinpoche's side or my side.
Water is wet and will always be wet,
Fire is hot and will always be hot, despite what you, I or Sadhguru says. 😁
I will repeat this comment again. Buddhism back in that time was only accessible for the one who wants to be a monk, not for the general society. Buddhism before Padmasambhava was very different. Buddhism wasn’t a religion only when Padmasambhava came, he created Vajrayana. The steps that Padmasambhava took are very different from being a Buddhist monk. You should understand this that the monk purpose is Nirvana or mukti, but Padmasambhava seems playing in the existence with his magical powers, very much similar to tantric Hindus. Don’t forget that Padmasambhava was a Himalayan yogi, so he should met up with many Hindu yogis and he was one of them..
@@user-jl4cs1vz9u you are from Shambhala Film Studio. I know.
@@user-jl4cs1vz9u Why the wait? Dorje Drolo is always here. Guru Rinpoche is always here. All you need is the right causes and conditions to see him in the flesh.
As for us unfortunates, we have to be satisfied with keeping him in our hearts and minds.
I am a Buddhist monk and being as me became Buddhist monk is almost 30 years ago and studied about Buddhism a to z almost over 20 years ago.so,I would like to say truly,in facts.sadhguru statement towards Guru Rinpoche is completely wrong information even as we Buddhist never criticize him because our supreme responsibility isn't destroy the peace and happiness of us all.
now I would like to say.if any of us youngsters or adults.masters or disciples.if we don't know precisely any kinds of others parts then we may not say anything because our little education can make big mistake possibly.especially don't talk on social media about dharma because dharma isn't easy things.
instead conversation about which lessons we understood completely.
Guru Rinpoche is absolutely buddhist.no doubt.if any of you guys have doubt then please most welcome to me.i would like to share with any of you kinds of these lessons feel freely because good conversation can make enrich our knowledge but unfair conversation can't make enrich our knowledge.i have many authentic reasons for Guru Rinpoche is Buddhist and sadhguru statement is wrong information but it doesn't meant i criticize him.it means telling the truth about these matters.
last I would like to say.buddhism isn't easy lessons.but it is a greatness science for create the real inner peace and genuine happiness ultimately.if any of you would like to studies about Buddhism then of course you do it even knowing complete about Buddhism can take long term.don't try to understand in short term.according to my 20 years experienced about Buddhism always call me .Buddhism isn't religion.it is a greatness science for all sentient beings equally for how create the inner peace and genuine happiness within ourselves.
Thanks for your comment, appreciated.
If you are an actual Buddhist monk then don’t judge and showing your limited opinion or saying “I am a Buddhist monk! See me! I am here!”. GO MEDITATE! I know you are not, even if you are you just broke the disciplines of being a Buddhist 🤣 if you are 20 years of practice that means you are one great fool, because a fool needs a lot of time to understand the simplicity of Gautama... you are making Buddhism so complicated.
@KC Himalaya It is disheartening to see so much intolerance on everything, when you were just trying to tell us facts
Maybe that’s why berating, belittling and demeaning is all that’s left in the name of spirituality to many commenting here, it was never about supremacy like you said but to shed some light on truth or if that word is so offensive then other alternatives to someone renowned’s theory.
Thank you so much for your insight , patience to spread the knowledge and wisdom🙏🏼🙏🏼
Om ah hung benza guru pema siddhi hung 🙏🏼🙏🏼
May everyone is always blessed🙏🏼
@@nameless5350 😆😆
Thanks alot dear teacher.
your already gained higher clairvoyant because you knew directly my invisible condition and thanks alot for your showing me respectful attitude even being a monk 😆.Please teacher explain me the meaning of Buddhism and Buddhist in simple way but flawlessly.explain me about meditate.explain me who is guru Rinpoche and where his birth place.explain me what's Guru Rinpoche done in this world, especially in tibet.you are real fool because you never know me even jealous my truthful.i wrote a little letter here though it's dosen't meant I am showing off with my education and title lol.your disrespectful words telling here, you're being an arrogant and irresponsible fake monk lol.
bye bye.
please guide me to become a Buddhist monk?
Well explained, I personally believe he Buddhist monk 👍
नमो बुद्धाय..🙏🙏 real god lord buddha..🙏🙏
నమో బుద్ధాయ..🙏🙏 Namo Buddhaya..🙏🙏
I feel Sadhguru meant to compliment Guru Rinpoche by trying to say he was more than a typical Buddhist because he knew so much more knowledge than the average Buddhist. Guru Rinpoche’s nondual mind was beyond the dualistic limitation of being labeled ‘Buddhist’, even though he absolutely had all the knowledge of the sutras and tantras.
😆😆😆 sorry bro,who can accept your unfair comment.
However his knowledge even he couldn't recognized who is guru Rinpoche lol.this is a prove of how much higher of his knowledge about Buddhism whether his knowledge about Buddhism is higher than some of beginners of Buddhists or not.
It doesn't matter the matter he couldn't recognized Guru Rinpoche.
it means he doesn't know Guru Rinpoche.it means he is seems like child in the field of Buddhism.
@@tseringkaljan8791 IGNORANCE is the man's biggest problem
~Budddha
This line suits you...
You are ignorant. Have you ever sat with sathguru ?
@@tseringkaljan8791no Sadhguru knows more about buddhism than average buddhists. But anyone can mistake, it is okay
Another great resource to know more about Guru Rinpoche is in this book: Rigpa, T. (2004). "A Great Treasure of Blessings: A Book of Prayers to Guru Rinpoche". Rigpa, London.
More specifically:
Page 13 to 14: Introduction: Padmasambhava by His Holiness Dalai Lama
Page 15 to 47: The Life of Guru Padmasambhava
Thank you.
I don’t know nor i heard from what sadhguru and what he have commented on Guru Rinpoche... But I am damn sure for Sadhguru God Shiva is Everything ,,,
I must listen to what Sadhguru have said it ,,
Namo Buddha
Namo Guru Rinpoche
Ultra relaxing music ! Peace on your way to you and all who are reading this ❤️
Interesting informations to learn 🙏
I have to ask sorry for if i said sadguru said everything correctly.
You are right and i feel very strongly to suport you as i am reading more about buddhsim history .
I think as an Indian we are very less knowledgeable of buddha history mahayana and vajrayana in India..
..
I feel buddhsim should raise in India again and thanks to tibbetian for preserving it & growing it for years .
Thanks 🙏
Buddham sharanam gachhami dharm sharanam gachhami sangam sharanam gachhami.
Three jewels always bless us with peace, love, kindness,compassion and happiness .
“Wise man are not wise if they are proud of themselves, if so it can lead towards self distruction “ #himself#owndistruction
Unlike DEVADUTTA ( cousin brother of SIDDHARTHA GAUTAMA ).
So guys be careful use own senses and follow what is right not what is being preached every now an than . #peace#GuruRimpoche
It doesn't matter what Sadhguru said. He has a right to his two cents.
Guru Rinpoche Padmasambhava was a multi faceted person.
"Padmasambhava wears a white vajra undergarment. On top of this, in layers, a red robe, a dark blue mantrayana tunic, a red monastic shawl decorated with a golden flower pattern, and a maroon cloak of silk brocade. Also, he wears a silk cloak, Dharma robes and gown. He is wearing the dark blue gown of a mantra practitioner, the red and yellow shawl of a monk, the maroon cloak of a king, and the red robe and secret white garments of a bodhisattva."
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padmasambh%C4%81va
Guru Rinpoche can be a Shiva tantric practitioner, a Royalty and a Buddhist. What does it matter? What matters are his precious teachings.
Does it matter if a great master is a Nyingmapa, a Gelugpa, a Kagyupa, a Sakyapa or a Bonpa? I don't think so.
Do not be mesmerized by name and form.
For example, your father may be a father, a husband, a son, a doctor, an uncle or a grandfather. Saying that he is just a father and not an uncle is both right and wrong. What matters is that he is a good man.
Ultimately, the Truth has no name and the paths to it has many.
Live without borders, without conflicts.
My two cents. 😂
Sadh guru don’t even know about Hindu. How can he talked about Buddhism ..??
I think he is your uncle.😅
@@karmawangchuk7182 You maybe right; in some other lifetime. Keep an open heart, an open mind. 😉
Willip,why were you wrote like this unfair comment? Sadhguru is well known master of Hindu but not about buddhism and buddhist.his English is well but his understanding about Buddhism isn't so well.very lack,he can be make mistake when he talk about Buddhism and Buddhist because his Buddhism knowledge is very lack.maybe we all know.i never insult him but telling the truth.he have profound experience about other many parts but about Buddhism his experience and knowledge is too lack.thats why he didn't know who is guru Rinpoche even a little part he couldn't recognize.be peace 🕊️ guys.
For you it is just fun thing, 2 cent talk throwing here and there while we trying to preserve priceless teaching.
watch and do share the refutation of the statement " Padmasbhava was a Shiva devotee" from Sadhguru by Mahayogi Vidhyadhara Acharya Shreedhar Rempoche of Nepal. @
You are the man! Talk it out. I fully totally agree with you.
💐🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💐
Well said, well said!
Who are you guru?, what knowledge do you want to be or spread ?? What can you do for our future?
I am one of the most luckiest on earth 🌍 Guru Rinpochey Buddhist follower☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌼💐🌸🌹🌺🌷🦚🪴Thank you so much KC la l wish you My bast just like i always gave my pleasure son’s From 🇨🇦Canada 🙏👏👍❤️
#savesoil 🌏💐💐💐
❤️Sadhguru❤️ our favorite and the most influential guru
🌺💕🌺💕🌺💕🌺💕🌺💕🌺💕🌺💕🌺💕🌺💕🌺
Where you from, maybe your not Buddhism.
🙏
I am not surprised by these Indian gurus. Yes we must respect ancient Buddhist Gurus from Nalanda, Taxila, Vikramshila, Odantapuri. But these new age Indian gurus should not be our role models. They are more like businessmen who stir up religious tensions. Dear Buddhist bros and Sis, remember what Buddha said " Three things cannot be hidden for too long, the sun the moon and the truth".
Taxila is in Pakistan 🇵🇰
My question - Does seekers indentify themselves with any religion?
Isn't identity in itself a barrier?
You are right, a true seeking doesn’t identity with any only with the cosmos.
In this realm people cannot differentiate between relative truth and Ultimate Truth. What the hell! They don’t even know what those are!
Sayan, practitioner uses/ chooses their practice as a tool like boat to bring them to their intention. If you also seekers, you know you choose certain method, and see if it works for you.
Seekers will not goes astray and will not say to choose certain method will make barrier of themselves to others.
So we use concept to go beyond concept.
Do you even know who is asking the question? Really?
@@raysubrata1337 agreed ray ❤️
Well i practice Bipasana and sometimes chant meditation, and I'm open to learn anything
For anyone to understand guru rimpoche as Buddhist i feel one should have deeper Buddhist wisdom.
#SaveSoil 🙏
SAVE SOIL #savesoil Let us make it happen!
#savesoul
#savesoil 🍃
OoooO nameless and SHIVA #savesoil let us make it happen!!!
#savesoil
Agree and Dis-Agree is a Perspective...
Make a Proper discussion with proper leader with Sadhguru in related topic with Proper arrangement and come to a proper conclusion...
I highly respect your politeness. About 6:30, I just want to remind you that Shiva tradition is way much older than Buddhism. The way of enlightenment was before Gautuma the buddha. It is okay to study both Buddhism and Sanathana Dharma, why don’t you want to touch that part 😂? This is a big missing, because this is the origin of all Buddhas and Buddhism, even us buddhists know this especially the elders. This is not a belief system, it is just the way it is. Please don’t ignore buddhism and the ancient dharma (hindu) 😭❤
A western yogi myself a practitioner for over 30 years. I just go my the source text. The word and modern day meaning of Buddhist or Hindu did not exist. Guru Rinpoche was not a shivite. I was very sad guru said such things without enough scholarship. He had no wife. He is emination of Sakuamuni and amitaba manifested at Tso pema lake. In that Mahayana kingdom. Practice all over India and Himalayas. Padma came to spread the vajrayana teaching. And maha Ati. These teachings were written down soon after the first Mahayana sutras. The shiva samhita tantamount probablyfew hundred years later. I mean you have buddhas teaching dominated the area with many civilizations and were the dominant group from the time of Ashoka to the 11 century conquest by the Muslims of nalanda and other great universities that studied the different Buddhist philosophy. The compote on was the Brahmins of the upanishads. Which was more conducive to house holders and stratified society. If the shivites came after Padma or they got from him will never know for shure. But if the timeline is correct Padma was over 1300 hrs old when he flew away to the copper colored mountain. There is recording of siddha flying from before buddha to milarepa to to the time some siddhasncame to Tibet from India to Tibet to debate machig. Such things were rare then to no exist now even levatation in meditation I have heard I know few practitioners who have seen but I personally have not. Actually I heard one lama that flew away during the China take over of Tibet.
I'm glade to know that you have been Yogi life for so long. Please be continue and our good wishes will always there for spiritual quest!
@@KCHimalaya Yoga means union...
yogi means union too. How can he identify himself then? 😂
Identity does not matter.
Teachings do not matter, initiation matters.
Sadhguru Ji, if you get time please read Nalanda’s script/text written by Indian masters #Sadhguru 🙏
Buddhism back in that time was only accessible for the one who wants to be a monk, not for the general society. Buddhism before Padmasambhava was very different. Buddhism wasn’t a religion only when Padmasambhava came, he created Vajrayana. The steps that Padmasambhava took are very different from being a Buddhist monk. You should understand this that the monk purpose is Nirvana or mukti, but Padmasambhava seems playing in the existence with his magical powers, very much similar to tantric Hindus. Don’t forget that Padmasambhava was a Himalayan yogi, so he should met up with many Hindu yogis and he was one of them before he is invited.
Appreciated your comment! But somehow it looks like you did not watch my video till end. So let me write it here, Guru Rinpoche is consider as founder of Tibetan Vajrayana, he is not founder of Vajrayana Buddhist, even before Guru, Vajrayana Buddhist is already in India and Vajrayana Buddhist carried to Tibet from at least hundreds of different Mahasiddhis, most of them from Nalanda or Vikramashila as such. Accept it, you know nothing about Guru Rinpoche neither Vajrayana Buddhist. Please be honest here, have you ever studied any Vajranyana Scripture?
If not, don't throw random knowledge. I spent over 15 yrs of studying all three Yanas of Buddha's teaching. Nirvana, Mukti, enlightenment that you are tallking about is not even same in 3 Yanas of Buddha's Teaching itself. How can you consider Hinduism's Mukti as same as Buddhist enlightenment? I study Sanskrit in India, met number of Hindu Sadhu and have debate and discussions. Do you consider me as Hindu Yogi? if i'm not wrong you might have some understand of Theravada Teaching and bit of Hinduism concept, but please read more abt Vajrayana. And one does not make you buddhist cuz you are monk. You will become Buddhist only if you practice 3 great dharma vehicles. And jst to make you wow, Not all Buddhist teaching is taught by Shakyamuni Buddha. There is teaching from past eon's Buddha and future eon of Buddha. Not all teaching taught on earth, teachings taught in different world, different realms by different manifestation of Buddha. I guessing these are inconceivable for you!
@@KCHimalaya See, at his time even Buddhism wasn’t a religion as Gautama Siddhartha warned that it should never turn into religion. Buddhism was a community of temples were as I said only for who wanted to be monks, not for the general society. Padmasambhava was already in the Himalayas back then. By then, Buddhism in India had absorbed much of the yogic and tantric cultures and had become a blend of these things, because Buddhism per se, as it was taught initially, is too dry. It was for the monks, not for the general population. So, along the way, a few enlightened beings made a nice blend of yogic and tantric cultures, weaving it into the Buddhist way of life. When Padmasambhava is invited to Tibet by a Buddhist scholar 1,300 years ago, he took the extraordinary step of weaving the Bon religion into this. Till then, the Bon religion that was active in Tibet was mainly about the occult. Instead of trying to teach them something new, Padmasambhava took the Bon religion as a basis and placed the Buddhist tantric yogic culture on top of it, creating a well-woven process. Tibetan Buddhism today is a blend of these multiple ingredients. Clever, isn’t he? So, you can say that Padmasambhava is both Buddhist and Tantric Shivaist, because don’t forget that he was also in the Himalayas with tantric hindu yogis before... Many of the later teachers went to Tibet not so much by choice, but more because when the Islamic invasions happened in northern India, the first thing that was attacked were the spiritual places.
So, people moved into the Himalayas and went further into the Tibetan plateau. If you look at Tibetan Buddhism, you may not understand the tantra, but even if you look at the paintings, the mandalas and mantras, it is bits and pieces picked up from the tantric way, particularly from Kashmiri Shaivism, which was a very evolved aspect of yoga and tantra. They took these bits and pieces and they were only trying to make toys, but they ended up with a spacecraft. That is the beauty of Tibetan Buddhism (vajrayana), the simplicity of it and at the same time, that is its frailty too. It is absolutely unique in many ways. I hope this could help.
My friend, I thought you will do some intellectual debate, but seems like same completely baseless comment again n again. I guess, whether you put pebbles or gold in donkey's ear, they will jst shake it off! lol
@@KCHimalaya, I consider them the both Moksha and Nirvana are just the same, yes there are some stages, but at the end you will go to Nirvikalpa Samadhi where you will later attain Mahasamadhi leaving the body. As Gautama describes it “the blow of the flame”. You just pop up the bubble of your karma (there is no my air and your air only one air), you will never seek any womb by then or the cycles of Samsara. This what it means to be a monk, is to dissolve into bliss. By then in Moksha, you dismantled the Anomaya Kosha (physical body), Manomaya Kosha (memory body), Pranamaya Kosha (energy body consists of 114 chakras and 72,000 nadis), Vigyanamaya Kosha (perception beyond scenes), and you are left with the Anandamaya Kosha (The bliss body which is neither me or you, it is the gate way to the cosmos)
@@KCHimalaya I am just wasting my time writing all this effort until I called donkey ears, I hope this will enlighten me one day... thank you, my friend 🙏
A yogi is yogi whether it is Hindu, Buddhist or Jain yogi.
I think Guru Rinpoche is a Punjabi (Odissha/SWAT valley and Afghanistan descendent).
Guru Rimpochoe is known as second Buddha to the Buddhists of the Himalayas. Buddha is a Sanskrit word which means enlightened or awakened. So can Buddha be called as Buddhist? Was Gautama a Buddhist? Many think that both of them were founder of Buddhism but not a Buddhist and the followers were known as Buddhists. All monks are celibate. Only rimpochoes, tulkus and high lamas marry (but not all) get married. That's why rimpoches, tulkus and lamas do not fall under the term 'monks'. Now you will understand why Sadhguru said Guru Padmasambava was not a Buddhist monk. Correct me if I am wrong.
Please people, read more before you write!
@@KCHimalaya he is right. Even Gautama the buddha said it should never be a religion… do you think enlightened beings will say I am a hindu or a buddhist? Isn’t identity is a bondage for enlightenment? Your video is nonsense, Padmasambhava will say I am not a buddhist nor hindu nor anything. How dare you giving him a card?
@@KCHimalaya Sadhguru Recap is right. Padmasambhava never said that he’s teaching buddhism nor he ever said that he’s a buddhist. Problem??
@@clavicusvile7132 First Buddhism shouldn’t be ism. It is not about faith, but life approach. See, at his time even Buddhism wasn’t a religion as Gautama Siddhartha warned that it should never turn into religion. Buddhism was a community of temples were as I said only for who wanted to be monks, not for the general society. Padmasambhava was already in the Himalayas back then. By then, Buddhism in India had absorbed much of the yogic and tantric cultures from Sanatana Dharma and had become a blend of these things, because Buddhism per se, as it was taught initially, is too dry. It was for the monks, not for the general population. So, along the way, a few enlightened beings made a nice blend of yogic and tantric cultures, weaving it into the Buddhist way of life. When Padmasambhava is invited to Tibet by a Buddhist scholar 1,300 years ago, he took the extraordinary step of weaving the Bon religion into this. Till then, the Bon religion that was active in Tibet was mainly about the occult. Instead of trying to teach them something new, Padmasambhava took the Bon religion as a basis and placed the Buddhist tantric yogic culture on top of it, creating a well-woven process. Tibetan Buddhism today is a blend of these multiple ingredients. Clever, isn’t he? So, you can say that Padmasambhava is both Buddhist and Tantric Shivaist, because don’t forget that he was also in the Himalayas with tantric hindu yogis before... Many of the later teachers went to Tibet not so much by choice, but more because when the Islamic invasions happened in northern India, the first thing that was attacked were the spiritual places.
So, people moved into the Himalayas and went further into the Tibetan plateau. If you look at Tibetan Buddhism, you may not understand the tantra, but even if you look at the paintings, the mandalas and mantras, it is bits and pieces picked up from the tantric way, particularly from Kashmiri Shaivism, which was a very evolved aspect of yoga and tantra. They took these bits and pieces and they were only trying to make toys, but they ended up with a spacecraft. That is the beauty of Tibetan Buddhism (vajrayana), the simplicity of it and at the same time, that is its frailty too. It is absolutely unique in many ways.
@@clavicusvile7132 The buddhist yogic system is no different from the hindu Shivaist ways. In fact, it is its roots from there. Shiva the Adiyogi is the first yogi who established the yogic system.
Now on Padmasambhava, go ask him who are you Siddha? Are you buddhist? Are you human? He sits with eyes closed. Being spiritual is to go beyond labels. Even buddhism agrees with what I am saying. This is the way Buddha teaches. You don’t identify with anything, then you can find your pure true self. There is nothing absurd about it. Even Gautama the Buddha himself said warned that buddhism should never be a religion. Can you label enlightened beings? That is absurd.
Boy traveled to India as Shiva,to Tibet as guru Rinpoche, to middle east as prophet Muhammad then to Europe as Jesus. Along the the way he got mustach. They all have same background military and to believe in god.as recorded in old book. They all are under aramic scriptures
For a normal people like us guru Rinpoche could seems as a bhudhist after all he created the tibetan bhudhism.
But actually i think guru Rinpoche saw himself as a yogi.
He was a bhudha himself (one who is Englitened)its a state of mind there had been many hindu bhudhas.
And yoga has no relations with any religions. An for such a great yoga master religions are just a tool to disciplene and the peoples.
There is no place for Tantra in Vedas . Tantric practices are not part of the so called Vedic Religion .
As a budhism u no need to be a monk to be budhism if some master permote buddhism as normal parson then it's also buddjism
Do true seekers say I am a buddhist or a hindu? Just I want to know what is the matter of spirituality through labeling. Whoever say I am hindu or buddhist is not a seeker but a card. The bases of this video is nonsense. 👎👎👎
Shiva you are here ✨💗✨. As the said, If you are Shiva the Adiyogi I am Padmasambhava the Guru Rinpoche 🤣
@@tashi9512 ✨Om ah hung vajra guru padma siddhi hung✨
@@shivatheadiyogi9190 ✨Am Namah Shivaya✨
@@tashi9512 🙏
My friend chhodak la thank you very much for telling truth about guru Rimporchhe la mr sad Gurus speech was totally wrong he didn't learn about buddhist also
Thanks, Karma Wangyal la.
My fellow being and celestial being forget about if Guru Rinpoche's Buddhist or not. My question to you all is do you know where you are at? What is our planet flat or round? What is our planet call and what universe are we in? If you cannot get this then stop talking about man make to confuse us. Mediated and ask your higher self for all the answer.
Hahaha you can asked to sinetice, wether planet is flat or round...😜
@@seldendrukpa9000 sister, I know about our planet and where we are do u know where we are ?
We are in the earth 🤣
@@seldendrukpa9000 we in planet ka or taimat not earth.
Ohh you mean tiamat...
TIBETAN BUDDHISM = SHAIVISM + BON + BUDDHA TEACHINGS ❤
Clearly Sadhguru doesn't know much about Buddhist tantric tradition. Possibly this is because most of the Buddhist in Southern India are Theravadin. Either that, or he is deliberately putting down a rival tradition in order to gather more disciples.
I heard the video in which he first discussed this and suspect that he simply doesn't know much about Tibetan Buddhism even though the original teachers were Indian tantrics and the differences between Indian and Buddhist tantra on the advanced levels are very subtle and only realized initiates can really understand them because they involve different ways of channeling the siddhi that result from purifying prana, nadi and bindu and other aspects of the experiences that come along with actual (versus theoretical) realization.
Ultimately, these differences have to do with the motivational thrust of the Bodhisattva Vow which channels one's effort into the desired end of developing wisdom and compassion for the benefit of all versus accumulating personal shamanic powers. But Hindu/Indian chandali is the same as Tibetan Buddhist Tummo and most of the techniques and postures used in Tibet originated in India as practiced by Hindu/Indian tantrikas, and the same goes for many other tantric practices with the liturgical differences being mainly only superficial (similar gods with slightly different names and outfits etc.).
So again, I strongly suspect Sadhguru just doesn't know much about Tibetan Buddhism especially its origins and history.
he said Guru Ronpoche is not Buddhist and he is something else.
I want to asked him who is he then?
He don't know who he is 🤣.
no idea and no information, nothing about Guru Ronpoche? then why he is saying Guru Ronpoche is not Buddhist? he going mad now
Buddhism born out of Hinduism! You must admit this supreme truth.
We all respect Dharma!
And there is no your Dharma and my Dharma but our Dharma.
I am Hindu but I believe Buddha too.
I have so many Buddhist friends although they are Navayana but you will shocked that they worship our Hindu Gods like Hanuman and Shiva too.
They also help us during Ganesh Chaturthi festival and chants Mantra along with us in Hindu traditional way.
You also admit that both Hinduism and Buddhism promote Humanity more than religion. So be a Great Human first!
As a Tibetan and buddhist by birth (at least traditions), my elders already know that India is the mother of all Buddhas 🙏
Sanathana Dharma means universal dharma ❤
Shiva, ganesha, buddha, and guru rinpoche are one of my greatest impressions in my life
@@DolmaR864tibetan cvck 😂
Guru Ripoche is a Buddhist. There will be many claimants for anything good .
Padmasambhava will say I am not a buddhist nor hindu nor anything. Enlightened beings will not identify.
@@clavicusvile7132 brother, being spiritual takes a heroic approach, you have not to limit yourself to any cast, creed, religion, or gender. I don’t think a being like enlightened as Padmasambhava will identify. Even Gautama the Buddha said I am nothing and don’t make any religion out of me. So calling Padmasambhava as the second Buddha, he is my friend.
Guru Rinpoche is Lord Shiva and Buddha is Vishnu
These are Sadhguru's words
"People do not know this, even Padmasambhava. People think Padmasambhava is a Buddhist because Tibetian Buddhism has enshrined him, no Padmasambhava always carried a trident (referring to Shiva) in his hand. He is not a Bhuddist monk; he had two wives, one Indian and one either Nepali or Tibetan. Both of them travelled with him wherever he went, always with a trident, so definitely he was not a Bhuddist nor was he a monk. He is a completely different kind. So these are the lands where he traveled, and later on, probably in his latter age, he settled in Tibet, or stayed there for some time, and came back to the Gangetic Plain in his latter age. There are various, you know, beliefs and accounts of this. But essentially, he is a mystic who did things in strange ways, and some of them who travelled with me in 2019 went to the Padmasambhava cave, which I don't think they'll ever forget in their lives. There was something incredible there."
The man is renowned across the world. Sadhguru has amazing level of popularity and following, his words are of greater weight then people falling out of scriptures. There are interest groups i understand with malevolent and other intentions, who would like to say Gautama the Buddha was not from India, he was either Tibitian or Nepali or born and raised in China that would be epic, for the Chinese (free credit). Gautama the Buddha himself is an export from India. Don't you guys keep on forgetting this. Knowing has come to you from India, for centuries over centuries. Don't cut your roots. Dalai lama understands this clearly. he said we are "chellas" (deciples) of Indian Gurus (it's on youtube, check it out for yourselves), which is the truth. He is smart, you on the other hand plain foolish. If Vehemently you appose this, you will fall, you will be left with a dead tradition, a Stillborn baby.
The video he spoke was
[Full Video] - Enlightenment Day 2021 |
Sadhguru | Arundhati Subramaniam |Book
Time stamp- 2:39:46
After watching your both videos it seems that you are somewhat either confused or hesitant to say what you wanted to say or you don't know Indian Buddhist history and in particular about Guru Rinpochhe in modern Indian context. Because currently in India certain people like this Sadhguru are trying portray or claim a Hindu Guru as they did in the past by destroying Buddhist institutions and traditions and blamed Muslim invaders. You must be knowing about Sanskrit language - the masterpiece of masters of ancient Nalanda university developed around 6th to 9th century being claimed by these idiots and now these idiots are trying to portray Guru Rimpochhe not-a-buddhist... what a joke...
Well, me personally have no confusion whatsoever. Hesitate? yes, if there is any benefit to bring back those dark histories. I aim to clarify in sense of global viewers with respect rather than seeking for repeat conflict. Appreciate your open comment though.
Well said brother
Sad's mind is full of insist on attachment. He is not humble person, he is (RAKSHAS)
Sadhguru who. Who sadhguru
First and foremost Sadhguru is an ordinary human being who is not enlightened being like Guru Padmasambhava.
Hahahahahaha. What is the matter of this nonsense video about Sadhguru?? He is already saving everyone’s soil 🤣 #savesoil
Take your soil business somewhere else.
@@KCHimalaya by 2045 we might suffer from famine my friend… 🥱
@@KCHimalaya #savesoil no matter what. Do you want me to give you are horrible statistics?
@@KCHimalaya At least this one soil unites us all. Maybe you will get it when you get buried 🤣
@@tashi9512 Wow, Sadhguru followers, First they slapped people and now death wish! I'm speechless. BTW, we do sky burial.
Bhuddha didn't wrote any text all text you learn you saw was make by 500 pandita or pandit ..Buddha great scientist like nicola tesla but pandit lama guru take advantage his products 😂
When people forget their history, then cunningness and propaganda took over their brain.
Actually, sadguru is one of ignorant hindus who always to try present Buddhism in Hindu perspective only. They don't have any average knowledge of Buddhism and history.
Last time he started talking about how the Buddha was mere disciple of Shiva but Pali Buddhist says all deities and humans worship the Buddha. There is no teacher for samyak sambuddhas, they are teacher of all deities and humans. These are all efforts to diminish importance of Buddhism in front of international audience. I will not accuse him for his knowledge about Buddhism because most of hindus religious are similar.
Love and respect from a Buddhist from south india.🙏☸❤
Please your language 😣
Sadhguru is comparable with Shiva and Guru Rinpoche, he is not another person to talk lightly about. Can you consecrate the Dhyanalinga? This is impossible even for the greatest siddhas. I am happy that I am born in Sadhguru age ❤
Namo buddhaya!
Siva is guru padmasambhav
Sadhguru can see visions of past at any places.
Patil Santhosh Kumar.ji.
It's okay,no problem.
then why he didn't know guru Rinpoche precisely?and why spreading the wrong statement towards?is it right?if some other great masters spreading false about your sides then how you feel it.just imagine others too.seeing one's side can't make the worlds should be peace.if one's don't know completely about other then don't say anything.its better.in our society almost 99% of since from small children till adults know who os Guru Rinpoche precisely.but why sadhguru didn't know Guru Rinpoche or might be he intentionally spread the wrong information over the globe because he had million and million followers.Whoever we are even stop spreading wrong information.
😂😂😂Pass me what Brand of weed you smoke 💨 before comment’s here # lickers
@@gjung7698 you believe miralepa,padmmashhambhava flying and doing miracles but you don't believe what I say.
First adiyogi(shiva),saptarishis,mastyendra
Gorakhnath,bhuddha and then tibetian bhuddhism
@@gjung7698 weed smoking guys cant even understand enlightenment in words
@@patilsanthoshkumar3115 Absolutely, they are very high on weeds 🤣 they don’t know even the origin of Buddhism! And now they are acting very smart... terrible!
#savesoil Sadhguru ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🤝🤝🤝
Savesoil!
KC Himalayas talking as like Sadhguru isn’t much of Significance. You! Maybe you spotted 1 mistake out of 100000000000000 right things. Don’t forget that Sadhguru is not ordinary person. Can you sit with eyes closed like him for 13 days no food and water? Lol
Sadhguru might not be ordinary person, but I met many extraordinary beings in my life. So what, they can't change me, I have to change my self. They can't give you their realization to u. Buddha sat for 6 year gain nothing whats the point of 13 days or even 13 months closing eyes?
@@KCHimalaya For somebody to be that of stillness is not ordinary. Gautama said realization is more important than samadhi, but samadhi is the consequences of well-being. So it’s important to realize through the bliss of samadhi…
@@KCHimalaya yes, but also remember that in this video, you aren’t talking about somebody who’s ordinary or in a butcher place. He is Sadhguru, his holiness.
@@aadhya4258 no lol, he is speaking as if he is his friend already met him in the market 🤣🤣🤣 a rogi (ENDLESS SUFFERING DUDE) is meeting an enlightened yogi. I will cry. Hahaha I hope KC Himalaya get enlightened one day and truly the Himalayas!
@@aadhya4258 To be honest with you, I also watch Sadhguru's Videos and very meaningful teachings, but here Im just trying to correct one mistake. Thats it, not more not less. Yes, he is Yogi who have level of realizations but that does not mean everything is correct and mistake does not make him not Sadhguru either. Don't worry!
Sadhguru’s presence is enlightening he touched the lives of more than 2.5 billion people. He completely changed my life. Now someone wants to just share a minuscule of problem or maybe he was right. Anyways, 😌 KC Himalayas is on, I don’t know why he is that sensitive... he is an Internet watts up researcher. Don’t make me laugh... lol
We know very well who is an internet watts up researcher! BTW, can you tell us how did he change your life completely? N ur kind information, his mistake is major not minor. I didn't knew "Mystic Can Make Mistake"...lol
@@KCHimalaya 😂😂😂 OKAYYY if he said he is not a buddhist. What is your major concern? Can a seeker like padmasambhava identify himself as a buddhist or a hindu?? Wake up brother…
@@KCHimalaya what is the “major problem” if sadhguru already transforming the world? You are taking Buddhism and Hinduism as a religion not spirituality 😌 so western educated. What an extremist! Don’t make me laugh again... lol
@@KCHimalaya KC Himalaya he is trying to be the Himalayas but he ended up making videos lol 🤣
Go change your bong water!