RedBridge Group Director explains polling on nuclear
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 06. 2024
- RedBridge Group Director Simon Welsh has explained polling on the Opposition’s nuclear plan.
Opposition leader Peter Dutton unveiled the Coalition’s nuclear plan last week.
“What we’re seeing at the moment is the old a third, a third, a third,” Mr Welsh told Sky News Australia.
“About a third of folks are open to the idea are open to the idea and supportive, about a third are unsure, and about a third are against.
“What’s interesting is what’s happening within each of those sort of three categories.”
The only batteries large enough to power Australian cities through wet seasons & winter are called; nuclear power plants.
You can't run heaters or A/C using batteries. It's a simple fact. Try doing it while your car's engine's turned off & see how long it lasts... Then imagine trying to power your; fridge, grill, stove, oven, kettle, microwave, tv, internet, PC, and hot water cylinder. Imagine the size of the battery you'd need for just 1 home.
It does not work & there isn't enough gas to burn to fill the gap. Labor will either fail to reach net zero, or there'll be black-outs & power rationing all over the country.
Surprised that people are so enamoured of renewables. Renewables seem to be very expensive so far.
It is NOT POSSIBLE to provide a reliable power from wind (which operates only 40% of the time on average) and solar (30% on average) WITHOUT ALSO having to build a duplicate energy production/storage system. If you build TWICE, it MUST drive prices up.
Redbridge- written and authorized by the Australian Labor Party, Canberra.
How about city folk have wind turbines in their suburbs, see how they feel about that. It is easy to expect someone else to have to put up with that.
Is it possible? Since the 1970s, the South Koreans have built 25 reactors in an average time of 5.56 years. Do any Google search and you'll find that it IS possible to build reactors quickly.
I think Simon is making this up as he goes along. As people start to realise RENEWABLES are in fact NOT RENEWABLE and prices will not be dropping they will
This requires a REFERENDUM not an opinion from an insider. This is a rubbish report.
It's polling.
@@dfor50 polling who, how many, when and who for?? lacking in actual detail at all making it a rubbish report
Nuclear 👍👌
wow talk about product Placement the Redbridge siganage behind him .. repeated ad nauseam.. I would have expected some graphs with real details on the actual question Asked not word of mouth much like albo and the Uluru Statement only being one page .
You say the question was on which people preferred Nuclear or Renewables .. Did you break down what you meant by Renewables ? because there is a long list some not so environmentally Green or Clean .. BioMass (Trees perhaps from those cleared to make way for Wind Turbine Infrastructure Installations ) Forget Hydro That has been around in Australia from 1893 in Queensland based on bore water pressure and still working.
Here's the Question between Solar Panels Wind Turbine Installation Nuclear Power Plants Wind and Solar Limited to conditions Wind speed Limited . Landmass Footprint . Solar .requires Sunshine . Land Mass Footprint . Zero Continuity of energy Supply Limited Life Cycle 20 Years replacement expenditure is 3 times that of Nuclear ..compared to
Nuclear provides Continuity of Power supply 24/7. limited landmass Footprint . Economy of Scale 60 years or more
What about a third who can see that it's just a last-ditch effort to differentiate from a labor [sic] party that hasn't really done all that badly over the past couple of years? What else has the Liberal Party got to offer?
Priscilla tends to disagree.
It's certain that millions of Australians would vehemently disagree with you. Particularly those living on the street or in their cars.
Not being the ALP. Providing results instead of complaints and deflections. Not featuring "people" like Andrews or being the preference of "people" like Lucifer Black.
@@KIA-MIA-POWthe issue is it wouldn’t be much better under a coalition government and a lot of the issues around housing has been a long term problem of the coalitions making that this cost of living crisis and immigration have made worse but if the coalition had invested in housing over its 9 years in government the same way the current labour is then housing currently wouldn’t be the issue it is today no matter our population growth
@@KIA-MIA-POW What a coincidence. I'm living on the street in a car since two federal elections ago.