Emily Maitlis reveals what happened immediately after the Prince Andrew interview | LBC
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 09. 2022
- Emily Maitlis tells James O'Brien what happened after the cameras were switched off following her infamous interview with Prince Andrew.
This video clip is from Full Disclosure with James O'Brien. Listen in full on Global Player here: www.globalplayer.com/podcasts...
#JamesOBrien #EmilyMaitlis #LBC
LBC is the home of live debate around news and current affairs. We let you join the conversation and hold politicians to account.
Subscribe for more: l-bc.co/subscribe
The latest videos from LBC: l-bc.co/Latest
Listen live to LBC on Global Player: l-bc.co/ListenNow
Nick Ferrari’s latest show: l-bc.co/3biHVvM
James O’Brien’s latest show: l-bc.co/3ONyPVI
Shelagh Fogarty’s latest show: l-bc.co/3JkNEha
Join in the conversation and listen at www.lbc.co.uk/
Sign up to LBC’s weekly newsletter here: l-bc.co/signup
Like, follow and subscribe to LBC!
Website: lbc.co.uk
Facebook: lbc
Twitter: / lbc
Instagram: / lbc
This is not your ordinary talk radio stream. LBC is the leading CZcams channel for live debate around the news and current affairs. We have live interviews and debates and you can even phone in to join in the conversation.
She did not bring him down, he did that all on his own.
Brilliant interview
A lesser interviewer would have shirked the important questions or did what media people usually do when sitting in front of a member of the royal family - tugged their forelocks and behaved obsequiously. Maitlis played her part superbly and deserves a huge amount of credit for a job well done.
Excatly. Spot on.
no, a massive pack of journalists & the morons who believe them brought him down.
@@jacksimone1677 , Emily Maitlis should be awarded The Pulitzer Prize or a OBE.
If you give someone enough rope…
Emily did not bring him down. He brought himself down with arrogance She did a brilliant interview
She just said that at the end if you're able to read between the lines.
“I think I just asked the questions” 😂
Translation: he did it to himself.
Truth. He sunk himself long before she sat down to interview him.
Translation: I don't want to get in trouble and agree to taking down a member of the royal family
Could see her thought process off "how do I word this"
@@Hazed64 she did a fantastic job of giving him enough rope.
He did the rest by talking.
She was careful to make sure she acknowledged her work questions research) i wouldn't be shocked if she was up for an award of the interview.
@@Hazed64 you’re both right, of course.
Hari-Kiri i think the japanese call it...except he didn't know it at the time.
The interview was impeccable. The end where Emily asks the prince, if he has any final words? Perhaps a morsel of humility, empathy and consideration for the victims, he says “No, I don’t think so” smugly. It was horrific.
The last question was the killer question . What excuse could Prince Andrew have afterwards?
'Horrific' indeed, absolutely 😳
I though Andrew said he was glad to be giving a chance to put his side of the story.
Precisely......
@@michaelpower4372 , and that he missed his friend Epstein.
And the crazy thing is andrew gets less hate from certain sections of the uk than harry and meghan, especially the papers
You beat me to this excellent point!
@@jerryoshea3116 Do you always try to defend nonces? Is this one of your 'hobbies' as well?
@@laurencefox5884 Jerry's pretty weird, right? I never thought I'd hear someone defend a person so heavily associated with traffickers and child abusers by criticizing their relatives for being too "discreet, boring, uneventful"...
Charles Manson was definitely not boring either! ;p
Er something to do with the establishment line and msm working hand in hand perhaps?
Uh duh
Jerry is absolutely right. Harry is in the limelight way more than Andrew, giving people more new ammo everyday to go at. It doesn’t take a genius to realise this is why Harry gets more stick. People forget things so quick, yet Harry keeps giving more.
She didn't bring him down, she just gave him the platform to do it himself
lol
She provided the rope.
He is so utterly delusional, made my skin crawl to watch that interview. Lots of respect to Emily Maitlis
And did Prince Andrew really think the public and the media were going to believe him? Deluded man who hasn't been told "No" often enough. Spoilt, entitled, pompous and mendacious. Miss Maitlis gave him the rope and he hanged himself.
Remarkable interview. For me it exposed Andrews complete sense of entitlement to the point he believed he could say anything no matter how implausible to explain away his behaviour and the general public would give him the benefit of the doubt.
Much like Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings et al during the Covid nightmare. Narcissists who truly believe they are way above the laws and rules that govern everyone else in this country.
Exactly like Boris Johnson!
Andrew is innocent until proven guilty.
@@ajs41 officially, that's true. He settled out of court before the trial so we'll never know. Then again though why settle to the tune of millions if you are innocent? Besides, I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about the sense I got of him from this interview as a human being and my conclusion was he's not very impressive, born into enormous privilege he had every possible advantage and still managed to blow it... entitled and clearly not very bright is quite a combination. By all accounts even his old pal Epstein exploited this and privately told people that Andrew was an idiot, but - to him - a useful one.
Exactly what I thought....
Total admiration for her, her calm consistent tone and the timing of her precise questions was perfect, the way the revelations kept unfolding was testament to her impeccable interview talent
Precisely.
Don't agree she's just a left winger and I don't like them
Imagine being a Mail reader and getting red-faced furious, steaming from the ears over Meghan Markle, while Prince Andrew exists. It's a strange world.
I don't like either.
Why is it a choice? Both are toxic
it's an extremely 'strange' world in which Mail readers exist.
Strange and getting stranger
@@markware85 So true.
Emily is one of the few journalists/reporters who is not afraid to ask the correct questions, even if it could cost her her career. I have nothing, but admiration for her, it’s a pity other so called journalists couldn’t be more like her!
Not bad for a biased amateur hack
Lol, get back in the knife nox, Miss Sharp. Maitless at the time she filmed this had a career spanning over 30 years. She’s had a heavyweight career in several countries, made many odocumentaries, covered hard news, was an editor of the Spectator, and spent well over a decade on the most heavyweight political show the BBC ever had, eventually becoming its lead anchor.
You ARE joking. Shes a CALLOUS BULLYING COW, WHICH FOR ONCE, WAS JUSTIFIED.
@@stephenbradfield3873 Whereas your comment was bad even for a thick far right trollbot...
Hilarious
The whole interview was VERY professionally constructed & implemented.
Viewers have freedom to accept what they believe.
For me, he was exposed & truly discredited beyond doubt.
Very, very easy to recognise he was lying through the whole interview if you have any experience in interviewing guilty people. He clearly had none, so blindly dug his own grave. Bravo Emily for having the guts to do it.
Thank you I couldn't of said it better!!!
And yet within beleif
yup
Beyond belief? Hilarious
They weren't his hands, he's a man of honour and he can't sweat because he is a war hero. Must have been the most insane interviewed person I've ever heard
"I can't sweat," was my favourite part of the interview, all of which would have been really funny had it not been for the nature of the things he had been accused of. A very strange man.
@@jonathanwalker8730 The train wreck of the year
@@jonathanwalker8730 Very strange individual.
Not to mention how much they love him at Woking Pizza Express.
"just a straight forward shooting weekend."...best part
Emily did an amazing job in this interview. Constructed with surgical precision and just brilliant journalism.x
Labour of love and advances her agenda
Sa rah Ferguson had asked Beatrice to persuade daddy to the invitation to appear on the BBC , so that they all could just carry on with their lives as before 😜 It backfired 😜.
Yes. She's far from my favourite TV presenter/interviewer, but she did very well indeed with this interview. A very professional performance by Emily Maitlis.
I have the utmost respect for journalists who expose the truth. That is what we need to hear.
Even if it's 20-30 years late.
She IS the establishment, do not get it twisted
On the rare occasion when journalists actually _do_ expose the truth yes, great respect, because they know they're going to get shut down & possibly lose their jobs & yes, as a democracy we absolutely _do_ need to hear the truth in matters which will affect our voting.
However, that's not what happened during & after that interview is it?
What happened was a very experienced interviewer asked a stream of carefully-phrased questions designed to entrap the idiot being interviewed & upon & around that a massive fantasy was built & sold (at 65p or more per daily copy) to the voracious public as fact when it blatantly bore no relationship with the tiny shreds of actual evidence presented.
@@swampy1234, no nick she’s the truth. Let’s move on from Borisism,trumpism, whataboutism and conspiracy.
They're just slags, destined from birth, in their eyes.
"I just ask the questions" Such class. Love it.
I have the utmost respect for Emily. She is professional, respectful and not afraid to as tough questions.
You don’t pay £12 million when you’re innocent.
"it's an amazing thing to have done, brought down a member of the royal family"
"I think I just asked the questions"
Real journalism described in one answer
the idiot brought himself down, nothing to do with her
Quite a loaded question he asked
@@swchri1264 yeah, definitely. I loved her long pause, compared to how fluid the conversation had been, like recalibrating and trying to get out of the loaded-ness of it lol very skillful
Very well considered answer. Also true.
I just rewatched the interview and it’s a masterclass in interviewing. Just ask the questions, let him drop his guard and then let him fall on his own sword.
If you're watching assuming guilt then yes. Have you tried watching, assuming innocence?
I'm in no way saying he is innocent, I don't know. But it's certainly intersting to see both possible realities before making judgement.
For example, how do you think you would perform in such a premeditated interview, knowing your innocence?
@@happinesstan What happened in the US court case? You seem very keen to defend nonces? I wonder what that says about you...
@@happinesstan that’s the whole point - an innocent man wouldn’t need to resort to the ludicrous “I couldn’t sweat because of Falkland’s hero stuff” or deny it was his hand in the photo or explain oddly that a man has an active role in coitus. Any way you view it, he dug his own hole. He’s thick, always was.
It didn't take much effort for this to happen. Put her in court and ask her to cross-examine a career criminal, then we would see what she is made of.
@@happinesstan One of the difficulties Prince Andrew faced is that of guilt by association. He was friends with Epstein, but we still don't know how much he knew about what Epstein and Maxwell got up to.
Final comment from James is unfair. Emily Maitlis didn’t bring down a member of the royal family; Andrew did that himself. She did a fantastic and difficult interview through which Andrew was exposed. We shouldn’t burden her with any feelings of responsibility for the fallout. You can see the seriousness with which she considered the subject throughout this clip which contrasted with James’ boyish and inappropriate excitement.
Her response to that question was perfect though, shrugging off what he said and just saying she asked the questions
yes he wanted the soundbite there, she responded perfectly.
Spotted and skillfully dodged a typical trademark catch question loaded to amplify O'Brien's own prejudices. Curses - foiled again , he thought.
That was gross of him
She was smart enough to dodge the question
Exactly. He brought himself down.
Then mummy shamelessly bailed him out.
Yep.
Your mum would do the same for you.
Succinct explanation.
with tax payers money. and yet ppl still back the monarchy
Yes. I have some respect for the Queen although I would like to think if I was born in the same position, I would say enough of this nonsense. She did however bring up at least two dysfunctional sons. Andrew, self explanatory, Charles cash in a suitcase from Saudi Arabia and allowing his employees to be made redundant in the week the country stopped ; also honours for a donor to one of his charities. I accept he was probably brought up not able to realise how corrupt that all was but that’s why it should all be done away with.
Its another example that rich and powerful escape the justice we are held to.
Exactly John
I was very impressed with the interview - for me it was all the evidence needed that Emily (and the whole team) were a huge asset to the BBC. It's a shame they were not more confident supporting her when the UK Gov complained.
It wasn’t the bbc it was itv !!
@@donlogan9840 it was BBC Newsnight
She didn’t bring down a member of the royal family. She inconvenienced him. He’s still there, he’s still around.
Dunno, now Brenda's gone and it's old wingnuts in charge he may be further ostracized
Still on the gravy train.
She is so professional and impressive. We need more of her.
At least the corgi's should be safe with him. I heard when the queen asked about it before she died, he replied "No sweat"
😆
Andrew is some what of a pro when it comes to old dogs
At least he has experience in grooming!
The groomer, gets to groom the corgis then, instead of under age girls
i wouldn't leave any dogs near him to be honest.
Although Andrew wasn't allowed to wear his military uniform at the Queen's funeral, it was nice to see him wearing his military medals along with “JIM FIXED IT FOR ME”
This deserves more upvotes.
@@jonathanwalker8730
Cheers matey 👍
😂🤣😆😊😀
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
He isnt in the real world is he
You're right, he's in the royal world.
Who isn't?
How is he not?
Just a shooting party nothing more
Certainly not in yours or mine.
Emily Maitlis… you’re an absolute legend in my book! She is a cool journalist, always looks in control of the interview and has a brilliant way of disarming most interviewees! Very intelligent lady.
Her interview script was written for her.
@@hb1338 I guess you wrote that yourself, well done 👏
@@hb1338 She's a trained journalist with a degree from (ironically) Queen's College Cambridge. She doesn't need anyone to write her script or do her work for her.
Why are you so bitter towards her? Jealousy? Love for Andrew?
And now she's left the BBC, maybe she'll have more opportunities to show off her journalistic prowess. It's just unfortunate that she chose to remain with them so long and assist them in their task of lying to the British people and covering up for the government. I don't understand how any decent, honest journalist can continue to work for the corporation in its current state.
@@razorednight , I hope Emily Maitlis doesn’t go to Fox or Sky where the lie everyday (Fox at the moment are been sued)
If that was any other person we would be in jail its a disgrace 😤
For what? Nothing was proven? Innocent until proven guilty? Would you like to be accused and charged with something that hasn't been proven in a court of law.
It's simple: money talks.
@@harryhill91 12million pounds to the victim says I'm guilty.
@@cmorecult yes, but guilty of what? paying a 17 year old girl for .. ahem .. services? at best that is his crime, from the evidence we have.
i wouldn't be surprised if there's more dirt under the rug but having known this girl doesn't seem like such a heinous offense
@@jonathanwalker8730 Yep 12 mil handed over to someone he never knew !
Emily was amazing. Brilliant interview. That Andrews team thought they did a great job is staggering
I think Andrew’s team advised him not to do it..?
2:03 James O'Brien: "It's an astonishing thing, isn't it, to have brought down a member of the royal family?"
Prince Andrew was at the memorial - he wasn't brought down, he's a free man.
I was astonished to see him at any of the recent events, and yet more people seemed to be complaining that Harry & Meghan were there.
Apparently the UK loves child abusers more than mixed-race couples. Doesn't it make you proud? 🤢
Which is messed up… and all the focus is on Meghan hate. Why do the media ignore this? Insane.
He was in civilian garb, not high military uniform. A tremendous humiliation.
@@Chrisjude100 You mean he has to satisfy himself with his copious inherited wealth and the fact he isn't in prison?
That poor man! x3
@@freakishuproar1168 Nothing of the sort. A civil settlement was reached that meant he didn't have to serve prison time. The legal system allows money (fines/damages) in lieu of prison as punishment and it saves the taxpayers money.
Even if imprisoned, he would have been allowed out to attend his mother's funeral, I surmise. That was the point I was making to the OP.
You may be envious that he is not living in poverty, but I am not. But then, that's me.
she is journalism in its purist form and all that it stands for.
truth no matter the circumstances/consequences to give you the facts to make your own informed decision.
she could have easily ruined her career or had it ruined by others for the nature of that interview considering his status and all that would stand by the royals but she crafted it perfectly making it impossible to go any other way.
a true masterclass of journalism/interview skills that will be studied and taught for years to come.
The interview was scripted by her producer, that is how the BBC works. As she said, she just asked the questions, she didn't create them.
@@hb1338 yeah fair and true point.
I'm sure she'll have a say in which direction to take it in built around her style of interviewing but a great interview it was.
@@hb1338 she's overrated as an interviewer
Great clip. Now I want to listen to the whole podcast. I saw that it had downloaded to my phone earlier today but now it will be top of the list to listen to.
Don’t reward this gross guy. You can also listen to her on many other podcasts
Oh the Grand ol' Duke of York. He had 12 million quid. He gave it to someone he didn't know for something he never did.
Genius.
Prince Andrew just completely lacks self awareness because everyone around him is telling him how magnificent he is
This is exactly right. When you’ve grown up and have noting but yes people around, treating you like your ish don’t stink, this is the consequence. It was appalling watching that interview.
emily is simply the best interviewer out there. calm and intelligent.
As always, Emily conducted herself in a professional manner, asked her questions, stuck to the facts and stayed cool in the face of the enormity of what was unfolding before her very eyes. She gave a masterclass of unbiased interviewing and the result spoke for itself.
Sorry, not 'as always'. Watch her interview with the Hungarian foreign minister.
When she says “I only ask the questions” and JOB says “that’s al we ever do”! 😮😮😮😂😂😂😂
Emily didn't "bring down a member of the Royal Family". Andrew did that himself; unaided.
It was the one time in his life where he had to stand on his own and face questions instead of fawning and grovelling lackies obeying his every word, an excellent interview, just handed him the rope and allowed him to do the rest
Love Emily’s humility ❤ her book is amazing, btw
Her "humility"? Or rampaging ambition? For goodness sake, is she a saint now?
Emily Maites's interview of Mr. Andrew was masterful. Emily Maitlis was well prepared and non-judgemental. She appeared to be calm and composed throughout the interview and was exceedingly patient in spite of his obvious evasiveness, feigned selective amnesia, framing all from his one-sided, biased perspective, and his repugnant, self-incriminating responses.
Emily's right she just asked the questions, it was Andrew's acts and answers that brought himself down.
It wasn't until Prince Andrew was 15 that he found out that people put stamps on letters because it was about paying for postage rather than because they liked his mother. True story. A prince asked a holy man how he could achieve enlightenment. The holy man asked him if he ever forgot that he was a prince. The prince replied no. The holy man said "Then until you forget, you will never achieve enlightenment".
Can you please release the entire video of this discussion.
Excellent context information
Brilliant interview by Emily. Excruciatingly embarrassing by Andrew. What was he thinking?! 😮
Absolutely exceptional, well done Emily Maitlis.
Excellent answer to the last question!
Absolutely! He brought himself down!
The fact that one woman is in prison and is now never even mentioned, is beyond belief.
Sorry I'm thick, which woman?
*edit: ohhh, _her_
The sad fact is she didn't bring him down though. All we've learnt from it is that powerful people don't answer to the law.
There is no evidence that Prince Andrew broke the law, just unsubstantiated allegations.
I think you forget he didn't break the law
@@susandurrant6357 you really believed his interview and that he didn't sexually assault an underage girl, virginia giuffre?
We already know that. The striking thing about the Jeffrey Epstein child prostitution ring is that although several very powerful men have been implicated, ONLY foreigners have been prosecuted in the US. Rich men almost never go to jail for such offences anywhere.
@@susandurrant6357 The Court of Public Opinion doesn't seem to care about that. Easy to see now how the witches got burned,
That's excellent answer " I think I just ask the question "
Emily's interview was a Masterclass in not only how to conduct an interview, but knowing the right questions to ask and to be insightful enough to think on your feet with direct follow-up questions. Brilliant!!
He wasn't "brought down"... he's still free.
But does anyone have any respect for him?
"It's an astonishing thing to have brought down a member of the royal family"
Except it didn't. He hasn't paid for his crimes in the way a normal citizen would. He's royal so he gets away with it. Brilliant interview, though
But everyone thinks he's guilty, and that he's an idiot so atleast we all know the truth.
Must have been gutted handing that 12 mil over though even if it was his mum's and don't forget he didn't know the girl hmm 🤔
They used to call mountbatten mountbottom.
how do we watch all of this interview? I can find the full audio on James OB channel but no video unless I'm missing the point somewhere... many thanks 🙂
Exceptional interviewing techniques. Completely masterful. Very thorough. Just outstanding. ❤🎉
'That's all we ever do'. 😂🤣😂
That interview was comedy gold 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
The very best of proper journalism
Fantastic journalists both of them.
This was a magic interview about one histories most disastrous interviews ever for the person being interviewed. 😂
This episode was fascinating in many ways, not least of all the slightly more awkward moments between the two.
Very enjoyable to watch people being fairly genuine in these times.
An interviewer interviewing an interviewer.
Genuine are you kidding me ? This is a mutual admiration interview " Oh I knew what I had got " Pity they were not so keen on exposing the Rotherham grooming gangs .
@@rolandhawken6628 Aye . Smug on steroids .
Where is the full version?
Wow would be hard to get two other people together with such high regard for themselves…
Yes, the recent Maitlis fervour is hard to fathom.
"i just asked the questions" - class line
brilliant work! congratulations...
Where do we see the whole of this interview?
"I think I just asked the questions"
Love that. 👌
aye. Like Epstein "just held the parties".
@@happinesstan Do you had parties like that too? You seem very keen to defend nonces?
You really brought out Andys "tendency to be too honourable" 😂
andy's
Fantastic work Emily. Bravo!
I watched their interview at least half a dozen times & i just heard it now (i watched it again) I cannot believe that he said what he said & neither she or anyone picked up on it!
He said when she asked about when he was in J.E townhouse & HE replied “no, i was in Chicago, because the next day SHE (Virginia) and they all went to the island.” So he DOES know her!!!
How the interviewer didn’t register this answer is wild! HOW did we all not notice?! She needs to speak up about this because this is BIG!! This is HUGE!!
Maitliss “We ask the questions” O’Brian: “that’s all we ever do”. No you express an opinion
Emily Maitlis’s interview is a world record “try not to laugh” video, or “try not to puke”, or “try not to cringe”. How the fk did she do poker face for that long?
Emily Maitlis is a professional, outstanding journalist.
Because she is unremittingly dull?
@@jimdavis8391 she was so dull, Andrew got complacent and hung himself
It was an extraordinary interview by an extraordinary interviewer, much respect for Emily. Bravo.
Rope-a-dope interviewing from Maitlis. Incredible stuff.
That is the responsibility of the media - to ask the questions. And keep asking them until honesty prevails. All too often, the media stop at the point that they think they have the answers that the public most wants to hear...
Thankfully, sometimes things fail to add up enough and the momentum fails to fizzle out, so further questions need to be asked until reality is exposed. Most of the time though, royalty just needs to keep repeating the lies because that's perceived to be the populist view.
Yep, and all the public want to hear is "you are right, he's guilty". Everybody who watched the interview under the assumption of guilt, should do themselves the favour of rewatching under the assumption of innocence. It's an interesting experience.
But they won't.
@@happinesstan You seem very keen to defend nonces. I wonder why...
@@laurencefox5884 Wow. You're edgy.
Too busy commenting on Meghan’s baby bump,
Love Emily she is a fantastic journalist. Could watch her all day.
When does the trial begin?
how do we watch all of this interview? I can find the full audio on James OB channel and LBC but there is no video, unless I'm missing the point somewhere...? Many thanks 🙂
Charles; 'Will you be my deputy?'
Andrew; 'No sweat... '
Andrew will be known as the Viceroy.
Give this man more TV shows
The TV stations hate him
@@rahuldahoob4513 the truth hurts ,but WWE must tell it ,even when it makes people hate us
You did a great job Emily of proving him for what he is.
Can I watch this in full or is that it ?
You can bet your life, if the FBI said they would like to talk to me and i refused, they would be battering down my door at 4 in the morning and dragging me out..!! Prince Andrew refuses and nothing happens, its sickening
I don't think they have the right to batter down any UK citizens door.
A true journalist. Emily Mattis had only questions and not an agenda.
🤣
'brought down a member of the royal family' 😂 If anything, he has got a pump up.
Brilliant interview! ❤this interviewer
She very humble for someone who got the pinkle of interviews with her own equivalent to the Frost Nixon interview
The pinkle ?
Pinnacle?
and didnt get it through unethical means like Bashir
@@Scotland2306 pinkle.
Pinkle 🤤
my question is, during an investigation where there were allegations against andrew, why was he interviewed by the BBC and not the police?
Maybe because then if he ended up in court,his legal team would argue his trial had been prejudiced by “trial by tv” and he couldn’t get a fair hearing
Or is that Her Majesty’s Constabulary? Haha
I think there is another book by one of Trump's team who mentions a few things about this case. The FBI were sandbagged took them weeks before they were given the name of Andrew's lawyers. Lots more stalling and then there was the young boy killed on his motorbike by the wife of a US diplomat. According to the book as the UK police obviously wanted her to comback to answer questions . The fix went in you don't get Andrew and we drop the case against the US woman.
Now I now that's from a Trump flunky but still it has a horrible stench that you could believe could happen.
He wanted it. His Personal Secretary resigned after advising him against it and being ignored. Andrew thought he could answer a few prearranged questions, put his side of the story to the public and be exonerated. He isn't wily enough to give the non answers of politicians.
@@soviet700 Yep Phil got them in their pocket.
Well done, Emily - thank you!
Truth.. and we do nothing. .
Thank you for your work Emily
you looking forward to King Harry?
I'm not sure James just asks the questions, there's two very different journalists in that room..
Sometimes in life your actions and words just come back to haunt you!
"Quite extraordinary." Aka what a fkng CAR CRASH 😮🤣🤣🤣
Exceptionally done so professional I was a open mouthed the whole time. It was a masterpiece.
So she was a very professional and experienced journalist, while andrew was clearly not an experienced interviewee. She had the upper hand. Does that make her a superior human being?