Dude, you have no idea about 90's rugby league. Raiders always lost without Ricky in the side. He was the reigning Daly M player of '93 & the Raiders got Smashed every game after he was injured. If you took Alfie out of the Broncos this match & added Ricky to the Raiders then the Broncos get pumped. As was the extreme importance of both origin halves to their respective Champion sides.
@@eddielasowsky7777 You can laugh all you want. The proof is in the results. Raiders couldn't win without Ricky. Why they lost '91 Grand Final. He could hardly run or kick in '91 GF. No Ricky, No Raiders. Simples
@M We'll probably have a chinese prime minister by then too, but do you think things will be better? 1990s Rugby League is awesome, you need to get a pair.
@@privateemail7697For the Raiders, everything did rely on Ricky Stuart. Despite the Raiders being stacked with origin & international players. They could never play at their level without Ricky. Raiders got smashed in every game after he got injured. Ricky was the reigning Daly M player of '93. If you took Alfie out of the Broncos this match & added Ricky to the Raiders, the Green Machine would have pumped the Broncos. As was the extreme importance of both halves to their respective teams.
This was 30 years ago, feel old?
Such a shame Ricky's injury, Raiders smashed the Doggies in 94 tho
Raiders fans complaining about Stuart's injury but ignore the fact that Meninga, Clyde, Daley, Belcher, Mullins and Walters were all there. Take the L
Yes Steve Walters very overated.
Dude, you have no idea about 90's rugby league. Raiders always lost without Ricky in the side. He was the reigning Daly M player of '93 & the Raiders got Smashed every game after he was injured. If you took Alfie out of the Broncos this match & added Ricky to the Raiders then the Broncos get pumped. As was the extreme importance of both origin halves to their respective Champion sides.
@@MartyMcFly3 Excuses excuses. You saying all those other world class players are actually shit? LMAO!
@@eddielasowsky7777 You can laugh all you want. The proof is in the results. Raiders couldn't win without Ricky. Why they lost '91 Grand Final. He could hardly run or kick in '91 GF. No Ricky, No Raiders. Simples
@@MartyMcFly3 I will laugh at your excuses. You need your nappy changing.
What a Great Upload
Thank You 🙏
wasn't even worth a game when Ricky was gone and I hate the raiders more then any other team because of 89
Those bloody useless grubber kicks !!!
Ah...The year the Broncos stole the Premiership from the Raiders.
ricky stuart's injury also helped the broncos
Brisbane also had top line players out injured. Not everything rested on ricky Stuart
@M We'll probably have a chinese prime minister by then too, but do you think things will be better? 1990s Rugby League is awesome, you need to get a pair.
@@privateemail7697For the Raiders, everything did rely on Ricky Stuart. Despite the Raiders being stacked with origin & international players. They could never play at their level without Ricky. Raiders got smashed in every game after he got injured. Ricky was the reigning Daly M player of '93. If you took Alfie out of the Broncos this match & added Ricky to the Raiders, the Green Machine would have pumped the Broncos. As was the extreme importance of both halves to their respective teams.