The words come from an off the cuff answer that Richard gave to a questioner at a Carolina university about 15 years ago. Our Australian collaborator set them to music.
A layperson's observation... that the two minds on the above presentation's stage were not developed to provide entertainment; rather, enlightenment and independent thought, through their own self-study, achievement, and widely comprehensive experiences. The trappings surrounding a one-on-one conversation are irrelevant. I'm here for the "humanism" embodied by these two contributors. ... and their respective grey matter? Cerebral "icing".
czcams.com/video/xIHMnD2FDeY/video.html Dawkins sits deaf/mute/moronic as actual accomplished biologists ALL say: "it is impossible that humans will EVER know life''s origin"
What Dawkins and his followers will never understand is what André Lichnerowicz [ mathematician, theoretical physicist and specialist in general relativity, professor at the College de France ] put in this simple sentence: “If I were to speak as a philosopher, I would say that the essence of Being is not existence.” [ in “The Triangle of Thoughts,” American Mathematical Society ]. In fact, every mathematician knows that there ARE many 'things' that do not 'exist' (such as Lie groups, Clifford algebras, Calabi-Yau manifolds,... etc.). Virtually NOTHING is understood in modern physics without these 'non-existent things'. Likewise, the 'evidence' for God's being is simply that it is literally illogical to imagine a world without the Logos [John 1-1] 😆
As a mathematician, I can inform you that Lie groups, Clifford algebras, and Calabi-Yau manifolds are all objects that exist - we can write down a precise definition of them and then provide several examples that satisfy that definition (and several that don't). Your last sentence also does not follow: however one construes λόγος, all of its usages refer to human constructs that aren't in any way contingent on a deity.
Oh a nod to circular reasoning and totally misunderstanding. I'll take logic, science, reality and atheism before "the bible says" "because I just believe it" and following a book which is utterly immoral by condoning slavery, killing people including babies and pregnant women in a massive flood, which has been proven not to be possible to happen. Supporting r*pe as a punishment for non belief. Yep atheism and humanism looks like a good idea.
Integrity This is a powerful word when it comes to telling the truth and Darwinian Evolutionists don’t really understand the meaning of this word. Their consciences are seared with a hot iron when it comes to the evidence that keeps poking Darwin in the eye. There is no academic freedom in universities to discuss the weaknesses in Darwinian Evolutionary Religion which is taught as a fact of science to students. Communism exists in these citadels of learning, many are being conned! You can read the works based on imagination by Darwin’s defenders of the faith, and there you will encounter strategies and tactics which are methods of brainwashing; or should I say indoctrination in order to achieve their goals.. This is a type of Nazi propaganda that is cleverly put together and is fooling people into believing a lie. Teaching Darwinian Religion as a fact of science is committing academic murder. It is just as bad as taking advantage of primary school children and indoctrinating them with LGBT ideology. When a baby is born it is either male or female in relation to their reproductive organs. Here is some solid reasoning: We have always had over-sensitive boys and tom-boyish girls, but they are still male and female. One carries an egg and the other sperm and when both meet there is fertilization and life begins. This is a fact of life! To ask children at the age of 4 and upwards do you feel male or female as you could be in the wrong body is gross abuse of power in the classroom! This is ridiculous as both are developing into boys and girls up to the teenage years. Children are open to auto suggestion at such an age; this is sexual abuse of the worst kind in my opinion. They are vulnerable and tender at such ages. Hitler said give me the school textbooks and a child at the age of 7 and I will have him as a man. Whether this comes to the ideology and philosophy of evolution or sexual identity being question at such an age, it will develop into chaos, anarchy and confusion among the masses. Both these ideologies are based on fantasies and imaginations gone wild. If you have integrity today you will be persecuted for telling the truth. Woe to them that call evil good and good evil. Example: Professor Neil Thomas studied experimental plasma physics at the University of Washington and carried out fusion energy research before moving into academia, in order to pass his knowledge on. He was teaching a course at Ball State University in Indiana when the Freedom From Religion Foundation targeted his course for exposing students to scientific evidence of intelligent design in the university, thereby questioning Darwinian Evolutionary Religion. Do you not know that it is a criminal offence to question the sacred cow of evolution? They launched a public campaign against him to shut him up and end his course, so the university cancelled his course. These people are hard-nosed individuals who have no integrity at all. Evolution is a religion which they serve. It has never been about science and religion. They desperately want people to believe that chemicals came together and formed living cells billions of years ago and these cells formed a common ancestor given enough time; from which came all the species and kinds within species today. Now that is religious to say the least! How desperate they are to remove God from creation, how afraid they are? Professor Neil Thomas is now a research fellow at the University of Reading England UK. He has written a book: Taking Leave of Darwin available on Amazon. This will be helpful for the sheep
Dunno why Krauss was invited, besides always looking like a clown, now, next to Dawkins he also appears bleak, illiterate and less informed, but as always drawing too much attention on himself. Could have been much better without him.
Quite boring. Basically pointless ramblings on physics by Krauss. Dawkins is old and bleak. New scientific evidence is beginning to comprehensively debunk the dated simplistic concept of mutations leading to slow gradual evolution of new species. There is urgent need for a major scientific revision of evolution theory. Dawkins naively claims to represent the ultimate truth and actively rejects attempts to a better understanding of biologic evolution. He thwarts the development of evolutionary theory which is sad.
I have heard him several times say in interviews and debates that he doesn't see any point in attempting to develop the evolutionary theory further, since we (he) already have the truth. That is a strange statement from someone who has totally dominated the public discourse on this topic@@jameswright...
@@tomashultgren4117 B.S! Why lie? Evolution is proven fact beyond doubt and he's not interested in nonsense other ideas like theistic evolution. He knows full well there's gaps to fill and wants to fill those gaps. Those gaps are early like epigenetic.
Krauss, Dawkins and tributes to Hitchens. This is absurdly beautiful.
That outro song. Out of control irony and I love it!
The words come from an off the cuff answer that Richard gave to a questioner at a Carolina university about 15 years ago. Our Australian collaborator set them to music.
Very interesting! Clever work!
Unforgettable discourse between 2 Greats in Scientific knowledge, biology and Cosmology
Richard Dawkins is the Jewel in Humanity’s Crown.
DNAmen 🧬🙏❤️
Oh I like DNAmen!
Is this your own thing or has it come from somewhere else?
Whichever it is I'm stealing it😉🤣
A great big cheer for logic, sense and reason.
Two tangentsl that never met in this discourse 😢
The High Priest of Atheism!
Priest is so ironic. I would say the High Sentinel of atheism.
Lol did the intro song say what if you're wrong?
Yes, the lyrics come from an event in a Christian University in Southern Carolina where a member of the audience asked Richard that question.
저는 개인적으로 리처드 도킨스를 좋아합니다.왜냐하면 저랑 생각이 같은 분이시기 때문입니다.저는 미래에 리처드 도킨스가 죽는다면 장례식을 간접적으로 가보고 싶습니다.
A layperson's observation... that the two minds on the above presentation's stage were not developed to provide entertainment; rather, enlightenment and independent thought, through their own self-study, achievement, and widely comprehensive experiences. The trappings surrounding a one-on-one conversation are irrelevant. I'm here for the "humanism" embodied by these two contributors. ... and their respective grey matter? Cerebral "icing".
Except for Richard Dawkins, the entire production was a mess.
The most amazing thing about Dawkins is the number of sycophants he attracts. Atheist yet high priest of fraudsters.
czcams.com/video/xIHMnD2FDeY/video.html
Dawkins sits deaf/mute/moronic as actual accomplished biologists ALL say:
"it is impossible that humans will EVER know life''s origin"
What Dawkins and his followers will never understand is what André Lichnerowicz [ mathematician, theoretical physicist and specialist in general relativity, professor at the College de France ] put in this simple sentence: “If I were to speak as a philosopher, I would say that the essence of Being is not existence.” [ in “The Triangle of Thoughts,” American Mathematical Society ].
In fact, every mathematician knows that there ARE many 'things' that do not 'exist' (such as Lie groups, Clifford algebras, Calabi-Yau manifolds,... etc.). Virtually NOTHING is understood in modern physics without these 'non-existent things'.
Likewise, the 'evidence' for God's being is simply that it is literally illogical to imagine a world without the Logos [John 1-1] 😆
As a mathematician, I can inform you that Lie groups, Clifford algebras, and Calabi-Yau manifolds are all objects that exist - we can write down a precise definition of them and then provide several examples that satisfy that definition (and several that don't). Your last sentence also does not follow: however one construes λόγος, all of its usages refer to human constructs that aren't in any way contingent on a deity.
Illogical to you because you clearly don't understand logic 😂
yea no you dont get to do "likewise" and just carry on.. they are nothing alike
all the things you listed are theoretical possibilities
GOD IS NOT.
Oh a nod to circular reasoning and totally misunderstanding.
I'll take logic, science, reality and atheism before "the bible says" "because I just believe it" and following a book which is utterly immoral by condoning slavery, killing people including babies and pregnant women in a massive flood, which has been proven not to be possible to happen.
Supporting r*pe as a punishment for non belief.
Yep atheism and humanism looks like a good idea.
Integrity This is a powerful word when it comes to telling the truth and Darwinian Evolutionists don’t really understand the meaning of this word. Their consciences are seared with a hot iron when it comes to the evidence that keeps poking Darwin in the eye. There is no academic freedom in universities to discuss the weaknesses in Darwinian Evolutionary Religion which is taught as a fact of science to students. Communism exists in these citadels of learning, many are being conned! You can read the works based on imagination by Darwin’s defenders of the faith, and there you will encounter strategies and tactics which are methods of brainwashing; or should I say indoctrination in order to achieve their goals.. This is a type of Nazi propaganda that is cleverly put together and is fooling people into believing a lie. Teaching Darwinian Religion as a fact of science is committing academic murder. It is just as bad as taking advantage of primary school children and indoctrinating them with LGBT ideology. When a baby is born it is either male or female in relation to their reproductive organs. Here is some solid reasoning: We have always had over-sensitive boys and tom-boyish girls, but they are still male and female. One carries an egg and the other sperm and when both meet there is fertilization and life begins. This is a fact of life! To ask children at the age of 4 and upwards do you feel male or female as you could be in the wrong body is gross abuse of power in the classroom! This is ridiculous as both are developing into boys and girls up to the teenage years. Children are open to auto suggestion at such an age; this is sexual abuse of the worst kind in my opinion. They are vulnerable and tender at such ages. Hitler said give me the school textbooks and a child at the age of 7 and I will have him as a man. Whether this comes to the ideology and philosophy of evolution or sexual identity being question at such an age, it will develop into chaos, anarchy and confusion among the masses. Both these ideologies are based on fantasies and imaginations gone wild. If you have integrity today you will be persecuted for telling the truth. Woe to them that call evil good and good evil. Example: Professor Neil Thomas studied experimental plasma physics at the University of Washington and carried out fusion energy research before moving into academia, in order to pass his knowledge on. He was teaching a course at Ball State University in Indiana when the Freedom From Religion Foundation targeted his course for exposing students to scientific evidence of intelligent design in the university, thereby questioning Darwinian Evolutionary Religion. Do you not know that it is a criminal offence to question the sacred cow of evolution? They launched a public campaign against him to shut him up and end his course, so the university cancelled his course. These people are hard-nosed individuals who have no integrity at all. Evolution is a religion which they serve. It has never been about science and religion. They desperately want people to believe that chemicals came together and formed living cells billions of years ago and these cells formed a common ancestor given enough time; from which came all the species and kinds within species today. Now that is religious to say the least! How desperate they are to remove God from creation, how afraid they are? Professor Neil Thomas is now a research fellow at the University of Reading England UK. He has written a book: Taking Leave of Darwin available on Amazon. This will be helpful for the sheep
Dunno why Krauss was invited, besides always looking like a clown, now, next to Dawkins he also appears bleak,
illiterate and less informed, but as always drawing too much attention on himself.
Could have been much better without him.
OMG...FOR ONCE reading comments was useful: SO EXACTLY RIGHT!
Quite boring. Basically pointless ramblings on physics by Krauss. Dawkins is old and bleak.
New scientific evidence is beginning to comprehensively debunk the dated simplistic concept of mutations leading to slow gradual evolution of new species. There is urgent need for a major scientific revision of evolution theory.
Dawkins naively claims to represent the ultimate truth and actively rejects attempts to a better understanding of biologic evolution. He thwarts the development of evolutionary theory which is sad.
No he doesn't 😂 why lie?
I have heard him several times say in interviews and debates that he doesn't see any point in attempting to develop the evolutionary theory further, since we (he) already have the truth. That is a strange statement from someone who has totally dominated the public discourse on this topic@@jameswright...
@@tomashultgren4117
B.S!
Why lie?
Evolution is proven fact beyond doubt and he's not interested in nonsense other ideas like theistic evolution.
He knows full well there's gaps to fill and wants to fill those gaps.
Those gaps are early like epigenetic.
You must be tired of life - Nothing positive to say at all?
I’ll informed and sounds hostile for the sake of it