Did Wall Street fund FDR, Hitler and the Bolsheviks? Looking at Prof. Antony C Sutton's theory
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 07. 2022
- This video discusses the theory presented by Professor Antony C Sutton that Wall Street funded the Bolsheviks, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Hitler, and asks the question: But is this really the case?
The other Antony Sutton video I mentioned in the video
• Antony Sutton - Wall S...
Follow me on Instagram / tikhistory
⏲️ Videos EVERY Monday at 5pm GMT (depending on season, check for British Summer Time).
The thumbnail for this video was created by Terri Young. Need awesome graphics? Check out her website www.terriyoungdesigns.co.uk/
- - - - -
📚 BIBLIOGRAPHY / SOURCES 📚
Full list of all my sources docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
- - - - -
⭐ SUPPORT TIK ⭐
This video isn't sponsored. My income comes purely from my Patreons and SubscribeStars, and from CZcams ad revenue. So, if you'd like to support this channel and make these videos possible, please consider becoming a Patreon or SubscribeStar. All supporters who pledge $1 or more will have their names listed in the videos. For $5 or more you can ask questions which I will answer in future Q&A videos (note: I'm behind with the Q&A's right now, and have a lot of research to do to catch up, so there will be a delay in answering questions). There are higher tiers too with additional perks, so check out the links below for more details.
/ tikhistory
www.subscribestar.com/tikhistory
Thank you to my current supporters! You're AWESOME!
- - - - -
ABOUT TIK 📝
History isn’t as boring as some people think, and my goal is to get people talking about it. I also want to dispel the myths and distortions that ruin our perception of the past by asking a simple question - “But is this really the case?”. I have a 2:1 Degree in History and a passion for early 20th Century conflicts (mainly WW2). I’m therefore approaching this like I would an academic essay. Lots of sources, quotes, references and so on. Only the truth will do.
This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. This video is for informational purposes and was created so we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made.
My entire life the Republican party told me "Big Business is the answer, Big Government is Evil," while the Democrats said "Big Government is the answer, Big Business is Evil." Little did I know Big Government and Big Business were on the same team the entire time.
I mean that’s totally obvious. Saw that when I was 17.
@@paintfatpurple7394 to be clear, I knew they were both bad, I just didn't realize they had so many common interests
To be truly fair, you were TOLD the Republicans = big business by the captured media institutions. The Republicans never themselves argued for big business, they argued for free business which to the left only means big business. "Government which governs least governs best." Its the people who rejected that message, most poignantly the supposed "middle".
@@paintfatpurple7394true
@fredjohnson9833 - the fact that Italian fascism was created by communists and described by co-founders Mussolini and Marxist academic godfather Giovanni Gentile as both super corporatism and syndicalism made clear that it was a socialist melding of state and monopolist corporate power, and in no way "right-wing" capitalism as usually portrayed
The fact that hardly anybody is willing to recognise that in 2024 shows the power of monopoly capitalists, cultural Marxists and left-leaning historians to control the narrative post-WW2
Anthony Sutton's work 'Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler' was one of my first big steps into being red pilled when I found it about 15 years ago.
Same here
Yeah it's Machiavellian at its finest. USA corps in germany made most of Germanys trucks even during the war and even sued the govt for bombing them lol
Have you read America's Secret Establishment the order of Skull & bones ?
I love ACS
I've download all of his books from internet archive
"Persecuted, never prosecuted"
This alone speaks volumes.
National Socialist Germany was subsidizing big business just like democrats and RINOs do today! Now that the US does the same, corporations and lobbiest come running from all over the world to get the "free" tax dollars so they can maintain their monopoly foothold!
One big difference between Ford and Bezos is Ford voluntarily increased the wages for his auto workers. Ford did not go to Washington demanding the implementation of a minimum wage.
Ford could justify the wage increase by the large increase in productivity from his implementation of the assembly line. Also he was able to hire the best workers Detroit had to offer.
Ford was groundbreaking, for sure, and people like Ford are a big reason why the US war machine was so fluid and powerful. It made jobs simplistic. Nazis, on the other hand, did not have such an industry in place. Their jobs required skilled labors to do, and as the war stalled out and the bodies piled up, they were forced to pull those skilled laborers to keep the war effort going. As a result they weren't able to produce near as efficiently or at the same quality. It was one of the biggest derailings of the war for them.
Very good point
Plus increasing the wages of his workers increased their buying power so they could afford to buy his products
@@PeachesandCream225 That was the real reason.
yeah ford also made german trucks DURING ww2...yes
Hitler spoke of the “international conspiracy of capitalism, Bolshevism and plutocracy” describing the Soviet Union as the “right hand” of this conspiracy in his speech amid Fall Blau in 1942
Hitler was, in many ways, a deranged conspiracy theorist and a murderous asshole, but he had some good insights at times
Now 100% confirmed true.
Europe- last battle
@@justanothercomment416 doubt you can back this assertion with any facts
@@NoonyJW lol. try harder. only a shill would even attempt such a question on a platform owned by them and censored by them. lol. try harder.
Regarding the bezos comment in the beginning of the video. Big corporations did something similar with with Obama care. They pushed for government healthcare for everyone because they would make money off of not having to provide their employees insurance
Yep, and the result was higher healthcare costs from the employees czcams.com/video/0uPdkhMVdMQ/video.html
And instead of learning from their lesson, people are now calling for more state intervention and a National Hell Service. You can't make this stuff up!
Healthcare insurance companies support Obama Care because many more customers are forced to buy their insurance.
@@TheImperatorKnight the days of evil seem to be over and quite fittingly I should congratulate you for the soon to be ousting of Bojo from the downing street, but the dye had long ago been cast, the game is rigged and people can't see, they sold their eyes to the government so that their pronouns were respected.
I know you are learning German and Russian, I myself am now in Rome but will be back in Russia soon, we would welcome you with open hands.
Also, as a polyglot knowing BOTH German and Russian (and 6 other languages), I'd be honored to help you overcome the real barriers, to the utmost best of my ability (as I lately became a father.)
You failed to mention that ACA was a comprise Obama made so it could pass Congress. His initial plan was healthcare insurance provided by the federal government and was defeated by private insurance lobby through Republicans( and even some Democrats)
I've learned more truth about the Nazis and the 3rd Reich with your Videos then I did in 13 years of german history classes. Great video as always
What was German history class like? Did you take those classes in Germany or elsewhere? Curious as to curriculum is like.
@@jayjayson9613 When it comes to WW2, they tell us Germans the same one sided Propaganda Lies as they Tell English, American or Jewish Kids
and now you learned about the 4th Reich. :D
13 years of history classes. ... Sounds totally legit 🤣
@@justadildeau well, I went 13 years to school in germany
It’s pretty clear that Wall Street funded the Bosliviks but they never received whatever they were promised for this funding. Merchants think in terms of cutting deals with power but power is adapt to tell the merchants to sod off when it comes time to pay. Merchants never rule even if they get delusions about being in charge from time to time. Any power they gain is the scrapes tossed back at them from the actual people in power in return from merchants funding them and doing power’s bidding.
Ironically Stalin had a better relationship with capitalists than Lenin did because he paid for American factories and engineers building his industrial base on a cash basis. No secret promises required.
Wall Street is a market, not a corporation. Likewise "the capitalists" are not a defined group/faction, but a class of persons, and poor people buy stocks/bonds too. Commies come to sell bonds you can be sure SOMEBODY will come and buy them. In fact, many investment professionals will openly buy anything at all as long as the price is right.
@@samsonsoturian6013 Wallstreet as in the big players on Wall Street. The story going around was that Rockefeller funded Lenin in exchange for a promise millions of Acres of Russian land raw material rights. He got stiffed on that deal. He wasn’t the only banker involved but everything was done without official documentation because there would have been terrible public reaction to it.
@@MrWolfstar8 That’s nonsensical use of the word Wall Street as big corporations and high net worth individuals often invest without use of the markets at all. If you're going to accuse, accuse specific persons rather than this "anyone richer than me is corrupt" garbage. And again, many investors just say "politics is for politicians" and buy anything that's legal and cheap.
Also, nobodies can also make controversial investments. I personally sold put contracts on the RUSL investment fund a soon after the Ukraine war started. The reason being so many people were dumping their shares in the Russian fund that the fund was trading at half the value of the stocks they owned and those stocks were trading below the liquidation value of the companies. This bet did not work out for me as the fund was closed soon after and I was forced to realize a loss, but this investment did not stop me from attempting to get a Ukrainian visa to fight in the war myself.
Pretty much, though Stalin reversed the NEP and nationalized a ton of industry so that part did backfire. But by the late 30s and the 40s, indeed Stalin worked with capitalists
... and look at what happened to those "American" engineers when time came to close it up. Most were sent to the gulags. One escaped traveling around Lake Baikal and survived to tell. Most didn't.
Hey TIK, would it be possible for you to upload the English subtitles? Amazing video as always!
The video has English subtitles? Or do you mean provide them to you in text format? In which case:
docs.google.com/document/d/1sELOViN-rLv0H1PTOmLs4f6K-QTqweBwcz66dltJgmo/edit?usp=sharing
@@TheImperatorKnight Ohh, I'm sorry sorry for the confusion. As soon as I saw the bracket "English (" my mind just went, "yeah it's English (Auto-Translated)". My father and I watch your videos together, but his English is below par at best. Thanks a lot!
@@HistoryMarche 2 of the best history channels on youtube together, hi there!
@@HistoryMarche damn you watch these with your dad, how wholesome
You can use CZcams to get the transcripts. Video bottom left are three dots, click, open 'show transcript', click on the three dots, select 'toggle timestamps', copy and paste...
The 'better channels' edit those transcripts to get rid of the automatically-generated gobbledegook which TIK seems to have done.
Its also funny how people dont thinkthat the same powers can play both sides at the same time
One of the main reasons why Henry Ford paid such a high wage at his factories was due to worker turnaround. People would work at Ford just for the higher pay, get burned out by the high operations tempo, and then quit thinking that five bucks a day just ain't worth it.
His shareholders filed a lawsuit against him because of this too, as they weren’t receiving due dividends.
So he would pay the workers more, over work them, and they'd quit? I don't see why this would be beneficial from a business perspective. To me, that sounds expensive.
@@TheCrayonMan529 Ford paid a higher wage so they wouldn't quit, you moron.
@@TheCrayonMan529 No, he'd pay more so he could keep overworking them without them quitting. Which worked very well, because people work earnestly and with loyalty, if they are adequately compensated.
I do love when TIK talks economics. Always shows how most peoples perceptions of modern day capitalism is wrong.
I like him on this topic too, my objection comes from disagreeing with his anarchist views. He's right that Socialism is State Control of the means of production, it's just that it seems that he thinks that any non-voluntary society is a State, and that any substantive influence counts as control. This would mean that a kingdom that has an ancient custom forbidding the sale of, say, slaves or alcohol would count as "socialist". I disagree, because I think there are natural, non-voluntary societies, which have the right to impose obligations of some kind on the individual. For instance, the family. You have a duty to obey your parents and love and care for your children, whether you consented to being in the family or not (indeed, you CANNOT consent to being conceived and born, unless you have some weird religion that claims that souls agree to be embodied before life). You are not independent from everyone.
@@CantusTropus yep but despite that he's doing good work in educating people about the actual character of economics
I dare say I would prefer it if he "stuck to banks"
I like how people say I've said things I haven't said as a way to disprove the things I say. Socialism is public ownership or control of the means of production. A family is not a public - it's private - and therefore isn't socialist. A kingdom may exist but not own or control the means of production, and therefore wouldn't be socialist unless it did own or control the means of production. I made this clear in the Public vs Private video, yet people don't listen.
@@CantusTropus Tik is very good at eliciting comments. part of his charm. he makes others better I long ago realised.
It's like G.K. Chesterton said (paraphrasing): You wouldn't call a society capitalist in which only a few can capitalize while nobody else can, just as you wouldn't call a society monogamous in which one man has all the wives and no one else can marry.
Higher wages are nice but ownership is better.
It doesn't matter if it's a king a commisar or a billionaire that owns everything. In each case you still own nothing.
Exactly, it is the concentration of power that matters, not the slogans used.
@@gumdeo Shut up you pinko connie commie monarchist anarchist optometrist...
A king, a commissar? What about a pope? Chesterton falls silent.
I disagree, such a society would still be capitalist if the country trade and industry are owned by private individuals or entities. Nowhere does it say that everyone must be a capitalist in such a society. Your comparison to monogamy is a false equivalence.
@@skeletalbassman1028 The key difference there is that economic activity is completely unlike religion, and that there is more to life than economics. There is a single religious reality (one religion or another is true, or none of them are, they cannot all be true) and when the eternal fate of each man is at stake, we cannot tolerate those who teach error in this regard. In addition, just because men have a right to private property does not mean that their right to own, buy, and sell is unlimited. Would it be tyranny to say that the selling of slaves is a moral abomination, and should not be done? The selling of heroin, which destroys entire communities? Child prostitution? Having the market be restrained by morality is not tyranny, but justice.
Man tik is really pumping these videos out, loving the content tik, can’t wait for more of your Stalingrad series
Glad you're enjoying the videos! I'm working on the next Stalingrad video now, but it'll be the week after next
@@TheImperatorKnight You talk so much about the invasion of Stalingrad yet you never did it yourself! Will you ever invade/visit/infiltrate russian battle sites? No boots on the ground?
Any more inflation videos?
@@sillypuppy5940 That would risk debasing his channel
@@TheImperatorKnight I tend to agree with your conclusions. When one considers the very basic investment principle of "diversification," it would actually be surprising if Wall Street _hadn't_ hedged their bets by investing broadly in the three front-runners to take over the modern period - liberalism, fascism, and communism. They couldn't have known for sure ahead of time how things would turn out.
To a hammer everything is a nail. Sutton is like that. As an economist he overstates the importance of economics and downplays the impact of political and national factors.
to a goldfish, everything is outside its bowl, and it is right x
He also doesn't know a friggin thing about stock markets.
At a higher level economic considerations (i.e. profit) turn into national and even international political forces. Look at all those woke companies today. Do they act in search of profit ?
@@aleksazunjic9672 Politics is bad for business. See target's bathroom shenanigans.
Ahem. A historian who made many bold claims learnt that if he ever made a claim he needed evidence. Sutton had more access to archive records than any other known person. He spent much of his time looking through bank records. Thus spends his time explaining what took place. As to the why.... he clearly speculates. And states he is unsure.
The Trilogy makes a lot of sense when you read America's Secret Establishment by Anthony C Sutton put out in 1984. In that book you find out about the controlling interests in US high society, and how they plant people in positions of need through The Russel Trust, i.e. The Order, i.e. Skull and Bones, at Yale (also see Carrol Quigley - The Anglo-American Establishment). So for the "why?", it is really simple, and has nothing to do with a want to form the "New World Order", but with maintaining a lifestyle that these people, i.e. Elites, are used to. Members of the Order help to create various groups with a right/left paradigm "fight" between them, in this way you divide the people by them deciding which side they prefer. With slight nudges in the right direction, you can steer society the way you want it to go. It may take many years to get where they want it to go, though. The reason why Elites want to do this is simple, keep us divided and we fight amongst ourselves, and they reap all of the rewards. #SeekWisdom
Another benefit with a two party system that are roughly equal is that it does not take much to tip the scales, so if they lose influence with one "puppet" they may replace them with another.
In 1929 an English judge called Lord Hewart wrote a book called "the new despotism" which is probably the best book I have ever read on a "deep state" and the legal arguments I have seen against it are few and weak as hell.
If you like Sutton this is right up your alley.
I think at this point you can say these people definitely want a New World Order- "you will own nothing and be happy."
Thanks for the book recommendation. I started realizing the futility of the left vs right politics presented to the mass and knew it was a trap, but unfortunately many still fall for it and play by its rule. I also see people behind their archetype from one side to another but never really grow, that is one can go from the left to the right, but just to be on the right team but not learning to treat each other better.
The trilogy is a great book
Without reading the books, I'd pretty much expect the premises to come out like this. FDR was an american president so american Wall Street funding him is almost a given. Bolsheviks were funded by others as well, so it's plausible enough. And when it comes to NSDAP, we do know american companies invested in Germany at that time, like Coca Cola, but as you covered previously the austrian painter was happy to use the german industrialists to further his own goals so if anything I'd expect him to do the same to the foreign ones.
Just generally speaking, even if the "global finance" finances someone, that does not mean said someone is gonna be a puppet for them. Revolutionaries and state leaders tend to have their own goals in mind, and therefore if their sugar daddies make demands that they do not like and they already hold enough power, they will quite likely go rogue. It also helps if the great dear leader is a socialist that hates the bankers and the money provider is a banker, making it easy to justify to oneself.
Basically, yeah you understand politics quite well friend.
Not quite, FDR a critic or opponent to Sullivan and Cromwell Morgan/Rockerfella and Avril Harriman/Bush he found his place by offering an American Version of Socialism. The new deal. It was this devils bargain which allowed him to take his place in history.
Maybe you should read the books. It wasn't generic "Wall Street" it was a particular cabal of bankers whose families still run this country and now the World. When you add to Sutton's books all the other evidence available it's beyond believable.
Honestly its quite unrealistic for us to expect "ethical" financial decisions from these big money lenders in the first place. Money is money. When the first Soviet five year plan started booming out of nowhere, or the German state started having financial success after Adolf was elected fpr no particular reason, we should have expected they both recieved financial injections from wall st.
To be fair. From 1943-44 the SS more or less took over. It's funny how Siemens, Bosch, BASF Bayer was left untouched. The war was not about ideology. The allies didn't give a shit if you'd done some stuff. Especially if you were a scientist. We can look past anything for them.
Sutton is close to the truth. There is another layer way above Hitler Roosevelt and Stalin. Still a subject largely ignored by historians and politicians.
Rothschilds
When I first read Sutton’s “Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development”, his first Trilogy, I was very thrilled with suspicions it confirmed, and much more. International Harvester GE and Caterpillar were among the first to infiltrate and benefit. With all the documented details on trucks, marine Diesel engines, aviation(the Mig-15 for instance was designed by Siegfried Gunther, who along with 6000 other engineers and technicians, went to work in the Soviet Union-many as slave labor but many were paid). Uranium mines in Germany for instance, right after the war. So much hidden from the general public, and so much of it so unbelievable, people think you’re crazy when you mention it.
Practically everything in the Soviet Union was built with American, English, Japanese and German technical assistance. Soviets got to pick and choose, bought entire factories, and only decades later made significant indigenous inventions. Igor Sikorsky had left for America by 1919.
The RD-180 rocket engines, still used by the US(but now no more since the Ukraine conflict the last few months)is an incredible Russian expansion, no one else achieved this. There is a 1995 documentary about them on CZcams (or it may have been erased)
For understanding the “irresistible pressure” and who really “ran the show” there and in the US and England, Douglas Reed’s 1956 study is essential. It was only published in 1978.
So I recommend starting with that and Sutton’s first Trilogy. Amazing.
In contrast, Germany had been ahead of everyone else in so many aspects of industry, which prompted the Brits and Americans to destroy it, control and re-industrialize it after WWI. Outright theft of patents was not so easy in that period, compared to the theft post WWII. Dirigibles for instance-Sutton details how the Americans had to circumvent laws and obstacles to acquire(steal) Zeppelin technology and patents. Detailed in “Wall Street And FDR”-
The Germans not only pioneered practically everything, their Heavy Electrical Industry was ahead of GE or anyone else pre-WWI. The electrical cartels, which also included Brown Boveri, GE, Siemens, had to adjust to pre and post war periods.
German aviation, after post WWI strangulation, then thriving again in the 1930s was practically unequaled.
The Germans created designs like the 1926 BMW VI aviation engine, a V-12 with hemispheric heads designed by Ferdinand Porsche -it was licensed to many other countries.
The block of that gasoline engine was used and a diesel made out of it for the T-34 Soviet tank.
As progress and competition continued, the WWII aviation engines like the Daimler Benz, and the British Merlin V-12 could only attain that much power using tetraethyl lead as anti-knock additive. Compared to the backward USSR, late to industrialization, German engineering was indigenous, as was American, English and French in many aspects.
Standard oil owned the patent and traded with the Germans, for their synthetic rubber technology. As the BMW and Jumo jet engines were developed, along with the V2 rockets and all other advances were made, one could come to the conclusion that the financiers and dominators decided to finish off Germany, and reap what was farmed before it was too late-
Why was Rudolf Hess shackled for the rest of his life after his escape into England, parachuting with documents, and perhaps a proposal?
WWII was engineered by a now much stronger hidden hand behind England, The US and the Soviet Union-
And now, why has Nato and its current colonies , the C👁A financed A z o v Ukro Nazi program for about a decade preparing to combat Russia?
What really happened culminating in 1991 with Russia’s rebirth as a new Federation?…
David Rockefeller spent a few days in the ussr after the ‘63 missile crisis, and then Brezhnev emerged in power-there is so much more to consider and try to unravel-and how about dual agent, Rockefeller owned Heinz Kissinger? And others, Nelson Rockefeller, Armand Hammer, Fred Koch, post 1945 uranium producers and new cartels-
And what about JFK’s assassination?…🤯
It’s evident that by the 80s and 90s, Russia had practically attained industrial independence, gradual, then full control of its resources as presently seen. And Ukraine prepared as a stepping stone for an attempt to conquer Russia once again-
The criminally insane think it can be done-evidence shows things have finally really changed.
No one else had access to the State Department Decimal files hidden at the Hoover Library. They were never to be seen by the general public, and much less published in a study. No wonder no one was able to dispute Sutton’s findings and he was invited to leave Stanford. Many books followed, and he received a lot of information from whistleblowers who never would have had the courage to disclose information on their own.
A study of Douglas Reed's book "The Controversy of Zion" completely changes one's perception of global events prior to 1952, but this book is hardly ever read because the global media has either ignored or discredited it as "antisemitic". For those who have read it, it opens their mind for Anthony Sutton's books and others outside the collective mainstream.
@@jasonweaver6524 Well said
Happy 4th of July TIK. I was the one whose comment you showed first as your first suggestion to reading Sutton’s books. I wanted to know your point of view because you are a great researcher. I appreciated your insight on socialism; and it woke me from the dogmatic slumber I was in 😂. I like your take on Sutton’s books; I do believe that Hitler’s party was financed by American capitalist, one of them was Henry Ford. Yet you are right, Hitler was already a figure of his own; he couldn’t be bought or negotiated with. Also there is a series of Sutton’s books on the Soviet Economic Development through American technical support. He chronologies it from the 1917 till 1960’s. Thanks for your take, TIK!
“Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development”
Probably even better to start with this Trilogy, as it was his first, after having the ability to snoop through the Hoover Library and access documents and State Department Decimal Files, no one ever imagined prying eyes would be looking at them.
And read Douglas Reed’s book for more essential info-
Thanks for making these insightful videos. I also thought your video explaining how war reparations didn't cause the weimar hyperinflation was well researched. Would you say the same about the the Ruhr Occupation?
The Ruhr Occupation didn't cause the hyperinflation, but certainly escalated the situation. I'll explain it when we get to it in the Weimar series.
@@TheImperatorKnight hope to see more of the series
@@TheImperatorKnight You forgot his book "America's Secret Establishment" it's about the Skull & Bones Secret Club at Yale University.
@@hashimawan2433 Unimportant to the topic at hand. It isn't about _who_ is doing this. It's about that it's being or was done, & possibly why.
Another Sutton book National Suicide would possibly have helped to answer the second question. |Let's say Sutton is right & Lenin & Trotsky were agents of the West. You had massive revolution occurring in Russia. Plus, how many people who seek power of that sort are then easy to control? You may want to hedge your bets.
Interest from investment is 100% a man-made invention. Without creating money _or_ fiat currency how could anyone "earn" returns from investing in oil? Have crude delivered to their mansion? How would they pay people to deliver it?
While I love hearing TIK work out scenarios, they're based on the notion that "Wall street" was going to set up permanent residence & control of Russia. They haven't even really done that with Wall street.
You set up systems, convince the population that "this is" all operating on laws of physics or nature, & then peer pressure does the rest. There's *no possible way that* the current mandated jabs have been tested for safety yet. That takes _years,_ not weeks.
But the more obvious the lie told by Daddy, the more ardently people react by covering up for His Lies. When the lies are proven, like czcams.com/video/1CE0fMdXjYM/video.html everyone triples down, shuts their minds & pretends that they hadn't heard the proof.
That it's Big Pharma, Tony Fauci or five banker families _behind_ this doesn't matter. It would not have happened *unless* people felt Blind Loyalty for their concept of 'Government' who can be peopled by anyone, & we'll still treat 'Government' as Daddy.
Set up the structure, then leech off of everyone. It isn't truly genius.
But it works.
I love these economic focused videos, really opens up ideas to how this world reeeally works behind the scenes.
Have you heard of Blackrock?
Thank you TIK! The internet needs men like you!
I would love to see you cover Napoleonic Wars since there are so many similarities between Napoleon and Hitler - Dominating continental Europe, not being able to invade England, going to war with Russia that ends up with a disaster, etc.
Creating the concepts of World War also.
European empires having problems trying to conquer (what is now) Russia and England go at least as far back as the ancient Roman Empire. I don't think they are all that similar, having few overlapping ideals and these similatiries seem to be a result more of the geography of Europe than anything else.
@@jackmcslay except none of them that I know of, innovated in warfare, dominated continental Europe before Russian invasion and lost continental Europe along with their own state after Russian invasion.
Napoleon too was an agent of the banking interest. He came from Corsican Italian origin, and grew up during a brief time when the island was administered by the British. A Corsican Italian speaking French with heavy accent rose to prominence in France and marched a French army at lightening speed through northern Italy, destroying the books of Genoese and Venetian banks, so the banks never had to pay back their depositors again. How does that compare to the Austrian with 1/4 Jewish blood rising to pre-eminence in Germany a little over a century later destroying the Jewish (defined in his Nuremberg racial laws as at least 3/4 Jewish by blood or at least 1/2 if practicing Judaism) middle class all over Europe, so that the Swiss banks never had to pay the dead depositors back.
Big problem you guys are having is that you're assuming any conspiracy beyond a dozen individuals can survive a long time, that is rarely if ever the case. Realistically speaking, it's just a whole bunch of corrupt, ambitious, and entrepreneurial individuals trying to get as much personal power as possible seemingly working in concert. Short version is the greatest enemy of the ambitious is the ambitious.
Well, in theory, maybe it was Stalin that went rogue, not Hitler. I read two of Sutton's books (Bolseviks and Nazis) quite a while ago and if I remember correctly, he focuses most on Trotsky. As TIK said, Wallstreet-Trotsky connection is not very far fetched, but it was Stalin who rose to power after Lenin's death and succesfully removed Trotsky and more or less, their whole faction. As Stalin went on industralisation and building military power on his own terms, he fell off with Wallstreet backers and at certain point, war was more profitable than rogue state USSR. I'm not 100% convinced that's true, but even with these neo-commies, there is a myth that Trotsky was a good guy, opposing the evil Stalin. When in doubt, always hear what neo-commies are raving about and the truth must be the opposite. 😀
I heard a Russian professor once said that the came of stalin to power in Russia changed everything the west planned
@@mishkosimonovski23 the fundamental axiomatic principle in this case is not true, however that doesn't mean it didn't happen.
neo-commies are neocons. Check it out. All of them were Trotskyites.
I have all three of Anthony C. Sutton's books. I'm glad you're covering this topic
There are alot more that Covers the areas that tik raised as problematic. Particularly the best enemy money can buy.
@@alg7115 i have started a channel serving up some of his interviews i have ... only a small portion so far mr hooomdly is its name.
Hello, not seen you for a while!
@@alg7115 some of Sutton’s online pdf books have been sabotaged, and that’s one of them. “ National Suicide” was the original version before he updated it and changed the title-
You have them, because they look cool on your bookshelf or have you read them?
Fantastic video as always. Totally agree with your assessment. Beautifully narrated and a great all round educative video. Proud to be a Patreon as always.
Glad you enjoyed it! And thanks for supporting!
I'm Born in Germany but I'm a Ex Yugoslavian and now I'm Montenegrian citizen and still in Germany.
Thanks for your work!
Bravo, odličan Posao!!! Hvala!
8:34 lol, nice Jeremy cameo there. And Happy Independence Day from this American viewer!
Sutton had it bang on correct. I've been saying this for years. I don't mean the arcane details. I mean nowadays the monopolists, mainly large home builders, give huge donations to Tory and Labour candidates.
A little of this on the Soviet side is also covered in the book "Stalin's Secret Agents" by Evans and Romerstein, Chapter 5, 'Three Who Saved a Revolution', but it is not the main topic of the book.
You really are talented. When one of your posts show up on CZcams, it brightens my day. Thanks.
This is a well done and thought provoking topic. Wikipedia sent me here when I typed "plausible truths".
As usual, this is another excellent video. I believe, however, that I can connect the dots that Sutton did not address, because I suspect that he saw it as a "bridge too far," no pun intended. This is me, getting wordy. Buckle up.
What drives all "conspiracy theorists" into fits of circular logic, is the belief that _"The Conspiracy"_ is one monolithic whole, grinding forward in robotic lockstep -- I know this to be a fact, because I used to think this way, and those others in that particular echo chamber felt exactly the same. This is absolutely not the case, however -- _"The Conspiracy"_ is a kind of fungible mass of humans who think more or less the same way - speaking _very_ broadly - and frequently act in concert for mutual benefit, with the money to make things happen.....But that doesn't mean that they either like or agree with each other, which is why you frequently see individuals in this group squabbling in counterproductive ways.
Without having read Sutton - he's now on my list - I will attempt to put his work, as outlined here by TIK, into a coherent framework, based on the one thing I did not hear referenced: the _Heartland Theory,_ described in _"The Geographical Pivot of History",_ by Halford Mackinder.
Mackinder's theory, in summary, outlines a "worst-case" scenario, of Germany allying or merging with Russia. Such an event would unite the two in essentially unassailable control of the the bulk of the Eurasian landmass, and that this _must_ be prevented to keep Britain and America from being reduced to vassal states by the resulting economic powerhouse...and 20th Century history demonstrates this.
As the 19th Century ended, Russia - for centuries a backward, rustic state, certain ruler's ambitions to the contrary - was beginning to rapidly expand its economic sphere in general, and its industrial sphere, in particular. _Problem._ *Solution:* Wait for an appropriately large war to come that involved Russia directly (WW1 was on the horizon for at least 30 years prior to its start), then fund a revolutionary movement that would up-end Russia, and turn it into a captive economy.....Check.
That left Germany...And Germany had started to recover in the 1920's, and was rebuilding its power base - Uh-oh. According to MacKinder, a "union" of Germany and Russia could come, if Russia were invaded by Germany and turned into a puppet state. Recall that a _lot_ of people in the Soviet Union were _very_ unhappy with Soviet rule, and would welcome almost any liberator...which is what happened..... _Problem._ *Solution:* Find someone with kooky ideas in Germany, who you can finance hard enough to get into power; then, let them go, like a wind-up toy, because the chances of Germany successfully conquering the Soviet Union were laughably remote, on a good day.....Check.
Hitler and the Nazis were tailor-made for that job; although I could go down that particular rabbit hole, I'll pass (I need to cook dinner). But.....What was the result of WW2 in Europe? Germany's complete destruction: German industry was essentially destroyed wholesale, the country was partitioned for the next 45 years, and the German psyche was so damaged by the Nazis, it is nothing like it was in, say, 1940.
Why would this benefit both Wall Street and The City?
Aside from war production profits, Wall Street and The City profited heavily from rebuilding the industrialized areas of the planet...so much so, that they got lazy by the very end of the 20th Century, and had to hurry with the catch-up game, to undermine the Middle East, and keep them from exerting too much control over the oil supply. With Russia a captive economy, and Germany essentially destroyed, the threat of the two dominating the Heartland receded; with Stalin hating the bankers' guts (like Hitler, he was happy to take Western loans when he needed them...but he didn't like relying on them), he ground down the Soviet economy into a centrally-planned nightmare, trying to out-produce the West in military equipment, which is definitely not 'butter'. By the time "Communism" collapsed, Germany had no interest in uniting with Russia in any way - even happily joining the European Union - and fully backed NATO expansion up to Russia's doorstep (NATO was formed to counter Soviet aggression, recall -- where is the Soviet Union, again?). Why? Because Russia's economy was starting to recover in the early-2000's, and Russia was moving to dominate the European energy sector, which would result in control of Europe's economy.
Which is what Ukraine is _actually_ about.
Tik, Diana West's book "American Betrayal" adds a whole other layer of understanding to Soviet/American relations. Great research and writing.
As she explains it, the US was saturated by communists from and for the USSR, and then we are where we are now. The wall came down, but where did all the commies go?(In Russia "and" the United States) Is Russia still the same Stalinist country that it was? Is Putin on the rocks fighting for survival or is he a cabal co-conspirator?
thank you for all you're work. definitely the best channel on YT.
Always informative. Great job TIK!
I've heard the Trotsky claims quoted often, particularly by James Corbett.
However, Wikipedia's article on Trotsky at my last reading does not allow for this timeline which I find curious.
Don't trust Wikipedia. The main Nazi economy page talks about privatization en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany
Yet doesn't link to or even mention the Gleichschaltung (synchronization) page, probably because it completely undermines the idea that the Nazis privatized the economy, which is what the socialists who write the major articles are pushing en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleichschaltung
@@TheImperatorKnight Even the Gleichschaltung article avoids talking directly about economics. Besides a few mentions of economics later in the article, and some reading inbetween the lines one can do, it just talks about social and political changes.
About what I expected from a Wiki article.
Don't put so much faith in Wikipedia
@@TheImperatorKnight Wikipedia can be a good place to start looking at something, but it should be considered to be like reading the first sentence in the abstract for a scientific paper. It should whet one's appetite, not be the sum of all the research you do.
If you’re going to Wikipedia for information you’re destined to be misinformed
TIK, you are the reason I’ve started studying WW2 on the eastern front and also going back to school to be a history lecturer or prof (haven’t decided yet). Thank you so much for your love for history because it just continues to fuel mine!
Bravo- such awareness and decision making can or does bring joy. thanks for inspiring me. To keep focusing on whats fundamental and important for oneself. to be able to then share their joy with others. With Complexity the threshold to detail does appear (need?) to inrease. History greatest paradox IMO- seemingly symbiotically if you find yourself sucked into the confines of duality/binary/material/on-off/ones -zeros/red -blue/good-bad/if you're right does that then mean i'm wrong?/Up-down Newtonian decision making.
For me History is a great avenue to be better at communicating/story telling as well as entertaining and bringing joy which is the most fun way to increase consciousness.
History matters to today's ability to see options available for tomorrow. Everyone can connect to this reality and finding the path ways to improve- I've found is understanding those connections.
And maintain a near absolute of humanity. Learn or relearn something everyday.
your happiness makes me happy so again Thank you for sharing. o/
Finally, i was curious about your opinion about this subject. Another great monday with Tik :)))
Great video bro! Keep em coming!
It's weird how people act as if "Wall street" is an unified whole.
These are people investing and competiting against each others. They invest in very different things, and someone's business interests are a threat to someone else's, even though they are both on Wall Street. That's the initial problem with the overall theory, tbh.
You are missing a key element to your understanding. Its through crises that change can be effected.
@@nickhambly8610 That doesn't even remotely affect my point
And I know that. It's not some kind of secret knowledge, it's common sense
@@Baamthe25th Correct Therefore a more accurate definition of Wall Street is required. Capitalism needs new Forests, Oceans resources or Markets to perpetuate. Wall Street is where individuals believe and/or are actually encouraged to find new Markets. They even have a term for it a Quant. Someone's new ability to harvest wealth. The only other place where this practice is found- but not like how the Americans do it- maybe why they seem to be always out maneuvered by them. Is the City of London. But I digress. Its packs of these competing individuals looking to Harvest new Wealth that best sums up Wall Street.
Happy 4th Lewis.
You too!
@@TheImperatorKnight well you sure aren't American, neither am I, but jeah.) Would be cool if you celebrate may 9th, victory day. (not may day)
Happy 4th tik love your videos!
Dude, I in awe, how do you manage to create one great video after another. TIK thank you.
In Germany, we've noticed for a while that the international Socialists and the Neoliberals are both in alliance over one thing: Open borders.
For different reasons, but both see their respective goals furthered by it.
I think you are spot on about bezos
really enjoy your content tik especially your videos on economics
What comes to my mind is the old Maxim of the golden rule: He who has the gold makes the rules. This coupled with the unchanging nature of human nature (greed, war, envy) and the world Elites not knowing the power of enough and I'd say this is a pretty accurate assessment of what's going on now.
@Tikhistory Cudos for the Jeremy Clarkson reference. I'd have gotten it and laughed even if you didn't include a photo. Nice job inserting some levity into such a serious conversation.
So glad you did this video! I came across Sutton as a 19 (left leaning kid) and could understand to a point what he was saying and he always stuck with me through the years. This was a great breakdown as well as connection to the things I was learning as a historian who was fascinated by WW1 and WW2 and how those were the foundations of our modern day. Thank you TIK
Sutton never claimed that Hitler punched a clock on Wall Street. Sutton presents contemporaneous evidence in this book, written for popular consumption, as opposed to his seminal _Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development_, published by Hoover Institute at Stanford, which is more academic. This is quite worthy of attention as it totally undermines the broad narrative of capitalism vs communism that has captured the world since Marx and Engels wrote _Communist Manifesto_. Sutton was striving to make the point that TIKhistory fully supports: the international bankers and the revolutionists are striving for the same basic goals, albeit for different reasons, so their alliance is reasonable to suppose, and Sutton explores that better than any author I have seen.
Spot on, the 3 books titled "Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development" are required reading if you want to understand the truth about Soviet communism and how Wall St financiers and the US government created the Soviet Union.
@@catonicme2896 How it was done is what Sutton showed us so well. Why it was done is hard to say without gettting into the minds of the decision makers. Why do the revolutionaries and the international financiers cooperate? It seems clear to me that if you build the opposition, you control the opposition and a need for totalitarian power can be conjured on demand indefinitely.
Fun fact: Sutton in his book on the Fdral Rsrve claims that the Communist Manifesto was originally written by the French man by the name Conversant or something similar at the orders of the the American (also European?) Bankers. Apparently Marks n Engels only posed as the authors.
I think it is possible they are playing all sides doesn’t matter if the sides they are funding attack each other they still come up on top and profit no matter the outcome
Great video as usual, thanks for all of your hard work. If I remember correctly Sutton was only saying some in Wall street/Industrialists helped fund Hitler and created some of the monopolies that were later used to help build Hitlers Germany and its war machine (simply because it was a profit opportunity for them), not a direct puppet control thing like they wanted with FDR. Was simply an opportunity for them to make money in a new captive marketplace and that some of these people who funded Hitler liked some of his ideas (yet they also liked other socialists ideas opposed to Hitler as well). It seemed like Sutton was just saying so and so did this, here is the evidence but he left no explanation as to why they really did it. Basically it was just another opportunity to get a foothold in another highly centralized captive market for profit and once again some of our own got in bed with our enemies. Big business is a fan of big government because big government creates big business, no matter who runs it or what type of ideology is behind the government in question.
Maybe I'm a kook but I do suspect "puppetry."
Have you ever read the "10 planks" of the communist manifesto?
I find it strange but could I not make the claim that we, seemingly, have been implementing certain planks of the communist manifesto since the 20s?
I cant name all the planks directly off the top of my head but boy we have a few now don't we?
Obviously a central bank is one and the income tax was one, the income tax was of course supposed to be a "temporary" measure too which fits in with English history, direct taxation was supposed to be unlawful unless during times of war and I personally have not seen a satisfactory argument against the "conspiracy theory" that the income tax is is unlawful under the US constitution and that the IRS cannot produce any legislation countering the argument.
The current social and legacy media collusion and censorship certainly seems like we are about to get "the plank" about "centralised communication" is it really a stretch for me to think that this is more than coincidence?
Maybe I'm a kook I don't know.
I mean it seems to me that there are neo Marxists EVERYWHERE, that we have been collecting planks of the communist manifesto for years and when you have evidence of such things that Sutton mentions with regards the bolshevik revolution can I at least be forgiven for thinking that maybe this is all part of something?
Sutton is dead right about the political spectrum certainly, we tend to think that a buisness cartel would be "capitalists" but of course why would monopolists want a free market as opposed to an eradication between the public and private sectors allowing that they themselves can either become the government or take it on as a buisness partner.
Bullshit, the Freemasons created both Communism and Fascism, they had to fund them and put them in place to have their opposing forces for their pre planned war. The bankers, who lead the secret societies, then fund each side. War effects change, you get to change all the rules and borders after a war is over, and you get a great sacrifice and cause tremendous misery. Anybody blathering that things were done only for profit are doing just that. Profit, is the way those at the top get their henchmen below to get on board and make it all happen. But it is not something that the bloodlines that own everything care about. Those people not only create money out of thin air, they decide what money is. WW2 and even WW3 were scripted out by the Freemasons and Zionist bankers, the next one has USA losing to China/Russia, which explains why the American government is intentionally sabotaging itself, their job is to lose the war. TIK is conventional while masquerading as alternative.
A big reason for big companies doing business in the captive Soviet market in the 1930's was the fact that a depression was going on in the West, so investment wasnt happening much there anyway, pushing them toward the Soviet markets even more. The famous tractor works in Stalingrad, among others, was built be Detroit-American industrial architects.
kryzys lat 30 to dobrze przeprowadzone wrogie przejecie na rynku kapitałowym wielcy oczyścili rynek z małych i średnich umacniając sie jeszcze bardziej
As ever a great analytical response - well done.
Tikhistory need to be brought to the attention of people like Tom Luongo, James Kuntsler, and the No Agenda guys.
I believe this quote quite accurately describes what alot of the highest of high elites have become in these days.
John 8:44-45
44 "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."
45 "And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not."
@@nikolamilicevic1040
I know. Many were often apart of the elite establishment and were backed by the order of occult bankers in finances. Trust me I know. But now they are all over the world not just the west.
Very interesting subject, TIK!
Thanks TIK great discussion.
I have heard it reported Henry Ford only agreed to escrow his German truck factories (that had done well mobilising the Wehrmacht) after a heart to heart discussion with FDR about the nature of treachery.
His reward was hugely profitable US military contracts, including a vast upgrade to the Willow Run plant to manufacture B24s.
9:50 Antony Sutton was a research fellow at Stanford University, not "Stamford". There was no Stamford U. when Sutton studied. (There is now, in Bangladesh and Thailand.)
A skilled artist can paint any one thing in isolation, a smart sophist can make any theory internally consistent. The moment that theory is required to explain more than one thing at once, it might just fall apart. Sutton correctly identifies many facts but misappropriates them to generate an overarching narrative that is not externally valid and that doesn't encompass the whole. If you get rid of this overarching narrative, you can start talking about individuals who absolutely contributed to awful movements in the 20th century with monopolistic intentions, but there's too many flaws with the grander conspiracy theory.
thing is with a conspiracy theory if enough people believe its credible and then base their decision making process they make them real. The albert pike letter is a great case proving this. without conspiracies there cannot be trade friendship basically most human interactions. Steve jobs sums it up well. two people talking can form an idea. from an idea a company can form. a company can bring others in. he literally explains why a conspiracy is essential. As they are so ubiquitous there cannot be one over arching one. just multiples of competing agendas. . i urge you to understand what and how the Hegelian dialectic works- Sutton in fact brings this 'tactic' into the mainstream or read up on Edward Bernays father of 'advertising' or propaganda has to say about it or understand what the 50 check points to a False flag are..
Im listening to lex rogan interview atm they talk about everything is Art. Well the number one question people ask themselves when they enter a Gallery- how is that worth that much. To be able to determine that one must experience loads of tosh. So it is with theories. ability to weed through them is a learned skill. underpined by a grate humbleness to change your views when faced with superior ones.
why? because what happened in ww2 is effecting what is happening today. There cannot be any doubt to this simple observation. or read up on the federal reserve conspiracy- that is the grandaddy of them all- if one existed. Sutton's book on it it is a great place to start. better yet and way more fun start with the titanic conspiracy- irrelevant if its true or not. but it leads in well to the federal reserve.The rationale behind it is a good place to start with a open mind. or the one nobody can explain the jet fuel conspiracy. my favorite cause its patently false yet the questions or logic raised seem undeniable.
Correct - he’s got some good material mixed up with a bunch of nonsense. Would take a year or two to go through every claim of Sutton.
You can make that generic statement about any historical explanation.
@@Exiled35 You cannot. Rectifying a historical explanation requires taking into account as many explanations and points of evidence as possible and justifying why yours is the most evidenced and coherent.
Sutton does not do this because he can't, so he lays out three separate reasonably well-evidenced accounts instead. The trouble is that he then tries to use sleight-of-hand to convince readers that these unrelated facts of the matter draw a pattern, even though he does not have any ink to pen it in.
The difference is tangible. One example is flat earth idealism versus systematized physics. General physics is not accepted because it explains any single feature of reality better than flat earth idealism, but because it explains a great many of features all at once with a superior level of detail. Indeed, it isn't very hard for any crackpot theory to satisfactorily predict *one* element of physical reality, the proof of value is in resilience when exposed to myriad details.
Great research 👏
Have you read the 1st print of Behold A Pale Horse by Bill Cooper as he uncovered some of this in this book only and not in the 2nd print. Creature from Jeykle Island is interesting also
One of your best. Brilliant insights as always
Thanks TIK. This videos are quite enlightening. Great video, as always.
I forgot the name of the book and author but I was saw this author giving a 2hr long breakdown of his book and the finer details of how capitalists literally built the USSR from the ground up they had these weird backdoor deals with Stalin in his quest for industrialization Ford and Mitsubishi were two of the more prominent companies but not the only ones. I wish I could find that video and the book he was selling again. This help actually started with the first days of the revolution though, one of the most iconic images from the revolution is a picture of 3 Bolsheviks fighters 1 driver and 2 shooters hanging off the sides of a ford model T.
I wonder if 'Wall Street and the Russian Revolution: 1905-1925' by Richard B Spence be the book you're talking about? It came out some six years ago.
Just assuming that Wall Street was being stupid and naive, and thinking in the short term, makes more sense than some involved conspiracy.
Yeah, that definitely makes more sense
@@TheImperatorKnight The "oopsy daisy" theory of power eh? Makes little sense.
@@TheImperatorKnight I am reminded of a comment by Andrew Greeley, the Catholic priest and novelist, that the Vatican only looks like a conspiracy from the outside, as there was not enough trust internally to sustain a conspiracy.
>wall streeet
>naive
hahaha lmao u people really do live in another reality
@@aquilatempestate9527 Have you been paying attention over the past 20 years? Yes, Wall Street has a long history of prioritizing short term profit over long term stability. In fact, it can only be this way. If the average life span of a person is around 76-80 years, and the working life span is say, 20-65, then focusing on short term rather than long term profits makes sense. After all, in the words of Lois XV, "Après moi, le déluge".
Greed is an interesting factor in all this. These people want their riches now, not in 50 years. How does waiting until after your own death to get rich benefit you? These are people who will create fortunes, but cut off their own children from that wealth.
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell would be a fascinating conversation. Dr. Farrell is familiar with Sutton's work. Too bad Sutton passed away years ago. By the way, nice review of Sutton's theories. However, one would need to read ALL of Sutton's geopolitical work to answer the questions posed in this presentation. Yet, peer-review questions on non-fiction are customary. Sometimes history tends to create more questions than it answers. I recommend a discussion with Dr. Joseph P. Farrell.
Fascinating! Great work!
FDR was the 1st caudillo of America, since March 9, 1933.
Books to follow up on : From Major's Jordan's Diaries (not about Hitler but more on the skullduggery of technology transfers to "enemies". Building up enemies never stopped. After that book you can read others. This is going on to this day.
Thank you, TIKhistory.
My take is this: Wall Street did SEEK to make puppets of all 3--the Bolsheviks, FDR, and Hitler, but each in its own way just used Wall Street support for their own ends, and double crossed Wall Street in the end.
As you had been short on 'all' of Sutton's work, I have been as well. In general, (always problematic) there has been a marshalling of resources in several European and Britain within it's 'commonwealth' since the end of the second Boer War. Both German and Austro-Hungarian Empires were blending their commercial interest between themselves and within their respective spheres of influence. It was easer to get a lemon cough drop in Sarajevo marketed as endorsed by the Kaiser than one (maybe cherry) endorsed by a Queen (Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Sweden or Norway not included, as too Rumania, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy or Yugoslavia). For the Brits they pulled together, from 1905 to 1910ish, a voluntary associations of like business within the Empire. Publishing is an example; Newspaper writers and editors from across the Empire would submit their copy to (forgot the title of the ministry) the ministry overseeing admin of the Empire for distribution at home and empire wide especially the BBC. Book publishing was also controlled for Canada, Shanghai, Hong Kong, New Deli/Kalcutta, Sydnee, Christchurch, Cape Town, Dublin, Edinburgh/Aberdeen were also published in Britain. This also occurred with pharmaceuticals with the forerunner of GlexcoKline assisting in medically mistreating Boers in concentration camps studying disease and pharm with ethnicity for determination of how to reduce the population (interesting that in light of current events). They got the contract to supply the British armed forces medical kits and supply all the field hospitals. Most of these associations were part of Thomas Huxly's overall plan backed by J.P. Morgan, Carnegie and Rockefeller to consolidate control economically, socially and politically. We are just now (last 2 yrs) gotten to see the outward accelerated plans that usually take 5 or more years to ease society (globally) into the constrictive spiked collar attached to a 1/2'' link diameter choke chain. It has been planned out in the form we are seeing today for nearly 200 years. This includes Edward Bernays, nephew of Sigmund Freud, who started development on mass - advertisement, public relations, and war propaganda (if you thought WW2 ended in May of 1945, you have not payed attention as in 2012 Obama signed into law a statue that the Intelligence services could dump propaganda (it is all war prop, always has been) onto US citizenry in mega drops not spoonfuls, a wide open fire hydrant right into open mouths. We are swimming in it daily. Bernays forbade his daughter from listening to the radio and singing jingles. Did the Silicon Valley CEO Geeks do the same for their kids - No Internet - No I-pad - No cell phone? I wonder why??? Basically, we are in, and have been in, an unfolding plan that those with power, currency (wink) and hutzpah to 'rid the world of useless eaters', while in the past they used their connections with any and all who would supply a move that would continue the trajectory of their plan for that outcome. Even Plato thought 100's of thousands in Greece were too many. In the next half of the year we will see who's lunch is eaten.
Hi, Tik! Maybe you are overconcentrating on positive control, I.e. situation, when you can make somebody do something. But the scheme could be more complex: you can add complete and uncontrollable yet predictable destructive element in an equation. For example, you might have following tasks and one assumption, which perfectly explains how Wall Street used Hitler in a preplanned manner:
Assumption- another world war will finally bankrupt all European nations. Tasks - 1) demolition of British and other colonial empires 2) introduction of dollar dominated world currency system. For that you will need somebody with potential to instigate a major and protracted war in Europe. USSR is of limited industrial potential so the only revisionist country is Germany and the only political force with corresponding aims is NSDAP. So support them a little to perform such task and you will have benefits greater, than positive control over Germany and profits, associated with its market
Great video!
I have to agree with you take on Wall Street and The Nazis, early on they funded him, they thought they were “playing” him, but he was really “playing” them.
I agree he went renegade in the 40’s
Exactly,the bankers thought that they were fooling Hitler and Germans ,in reality Germans and nazis were fooling rothschilds and zionists .when Germany became sufficiently powerful by annexing austria and bankrupting rothschilds by capturing their properties,the rothschilds and zionists understood the real intention of Hitler "to free the world from international bankers" . They started propaganda portraying Germans as evil post 1937
Also the nazis used zionists in HAAVARA AGREEMENT
When Hitler started war against international bankers through revolution in 1933,the world market boycotted German goods,however the Nazis were determined and they took all properties from jews,this persuaded the zionist to strike a deal
The nazis would stop harming Jews while in return rothschilds would help to rebuild German economy by helping sell German goods
However by 1937 German economy was booming and Hitler had once again started propganda against zionists and international bankers,so international bankers controlling media did the same.
But now bankers could do nothing and Germans had become almost self reliant through Autarky and oil and rubber refineries were booming by continuous construction projects ,on the other hand the balkans and other countries needed German resources
The only way to defeat germany was to force Germany to war by persuading poland to kill German minorities .
Read Carroll Quigley’s “The Anglo-American Establishment” for more perspectives. If you can read my comment-y👹utube is shadow banning this and many more comment sections in various channels.
@@jfb3567 absolutely agreed
See "Greatest story never told"
Read the book "myth of german villainy"
@@jfb3567 I can read your comment but I can't find it in JC Guderian comment section
Really helpful summary of ur best wrk
Great video, thank you. Very interesting.
As a historian, you have the talent of explaining history and political and economic concepts in a way that is understandable to a lay person, like myself, without dumbing down. I was never able to understand the differences between nationalism, internationalism, fascism, Nazism, socialism, and Marxism. They all seemed quite similar to me, but others insisted they were not. You were able to explain the differences, some quite subtle, in a way that conformed to observations and made scene. Thank you.
While watching this video I was struck by similarities with recent history concerning the PRC/CCP, in comparison to that of NAZI Germany and the USSR. It seems to explain capitals affinity for the PRC, and the CCP's exploitation of that capital. It appears that the CCP are nationalist socialist much like NAZI Germany. Is this observation correct? The observation that socialism is incapable of innovation rings true.
I know it's outside your field of study, but please do a video about the political and economics of Nationalist Japan prior to WW2. The "Belt and Road Initiative" ("One Belt One Road")/"Win-Win Cooperation" seems like a rehash of the "Great Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere".
I am reading Kotkins biography on Stalin. I do not believe Stalin was anybody’s “ boy” . He used foreign countries and was not used by them. Kotkins two volumes thus far are very good.
Just read, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy '86, quite an easy read actually. I've watched this vid 3 times, great presentation, simple questions, optional answers. Then your knowledged opinion. Very professional.
I’ve read all three too. An excellent summary.
16:14 Well, truth be told, doing this ensures you can fund both sides, this way whomever comes out on top you'll have in your back pocket. Love the content TIK, it's extremely refreshing hearing from someone who understands economics.
yes. The hegelian dialectic. Power is ability to elicit change. A crises is the best way to ensure the change you want. Especially when the crises is of your making.
@@nickhambly8610 Power is the ability to elicit change? What about 'not change' if you so wish? Power is the ability to impose your will in the world. It is closely related to intelligence and the ability to persuade others to do your bidding
@@odin1313 Fully aware what you have done...wow. I have had so much to say about that that im left unable to say anything... want to see how many or if anyone picks up on it... you and mc are the stuff that gives hope.
tbc.
@@nickhambly8610 haha Thanks!
Great video dude! I’m just into his final book now and you’re theory makes sense that Hitler went radical in the latter years, consequentially the loss was imminent with lack of funding oil etc that’s why hitler went gung ho chasing Russia in the winter for more fuel.
0:49 That cover is amazing, oh my God
Excellent as always
You've given me a new tool for finding common ground with socialists while still disputing them: "We both hate monopolies. We disagree on the solution. Let's talk."
Remember, the Marxist never argues honestly and will always use whatever you hold dear against you. Good luck.
@@cloudybeforerain7134 ey come on don't generalize
I'm on the socialist spectrum and a bunch of my friends are MLs
Debates go pretty smoothly tbh, I believe what matters the most in smooth discourse is personality and not ideological alignment
Cheers
@@cloudybeforerain7134 Someone that says that about an entire group of people outs themselves as someone who also can't argue honestly. It's neat how both die hard socialists and die hard capitalists often do the same shit but point fingers
@@verpix4956 Where are you in the world?
@@seanbeadles7421 If you think there are honest Marxists, you haven’t met any Marxists.
What a terrifying reality to discover about our own world, don't y'all think???
Amazing explaining (TIK) Allot thanks for sharing ...always Money strength movements are not stopping amongst Alline & enemies in Mean times ..I think Geopolitical competition & resources capturing are creating wars amongst polar countries ...I appreciate Producing & sharing such videos
“Commieservatives” had me rolling on the floor XD
IBM and the holocaust by Edwin Black, although somewhat corny written maybe due to the translated version I read, nicely supports the conclusion monopoly capitalists weren't pulling Hitlers strings. They were seeing a major profit in dealing with Nazi Germany, under the guise of being foreign stockholders in a solely German company. The Nazi's in turn were willing to pay handsomely for technology they needed for their (war)efforts. The minute they realized they in reality dealt with non-German foreign capitalist monopolists run companies, they quickly 'privatized' the companies and put their own henchman in charge. IBM made an insane amount of money by providing the pre-computer era automization of afministrative processes like railway timetabling, economy planning and population census - including analyzation and assessing every aspect of jewish presence in Germany and all overrun countries. Effectively creating the basic administrative preparation of the holocaust.
Interesting
I wonder what Professor Sutton would have said about Wall Street's support of Red China.
Patrick m Wood: technocray
He was Suttons friend and carried on his work. Sutton work was very unfinished as it was wrote in the 70s. In the sense that there were gaps as tik points out. But Patrick fills them in
That Temu ad I got while listening to this felt oddly dystopian
Excellent video as usual
This channel is the only reason why I didn't become a communist. Support free market economics
You made a good choice. However, if things continue as they are, we'll all be communist soon anyway.
@@TheImperatorKnight Hope it doesn't come to that situation.
@@gocool_2.0 let´s pray :) czcams.com/video/9k_ptxWsadI/video.html
@@TheImperatorKnight ....You are correct, and we are basically already there. Here's something that will help you figure out why things are the way they are.
After the assassination of Abraham Lincoln in the American Civil War the internationalist's took over the country, led by Albert Pike. Pike was a Confederate general that was imprisoned when the war ended because he had ordered troops under his command to not only scalp, but to disembowel not only troops, but woman and children with raids he conducted in Minnesota and other states. Pike was a 33rd degree Freemason, the head of the Illuminati in the America's and along with another Confederate War General, Nathan Bedford Forrest, founded the KKK in Tennessee in 1866. Two days after Lincoln was assassinated, fellow Freemason, now President Andrew Johnson ordered Pikes release, and with two weeks he was sitting in the White House basically running the country. In Feb, 1871, what was called the Organic Act was passed, which includes the 14th amendment that basically turned everyone into future slaves. On August, 15, 1871, Pike wrote the infamous letter to Mazzini in Italy, head of the illuminati overall outlining the plan for the 3 world wars, that have happened or are happening the exact way he planned them. Note...when Mazzini died, Pike became overall leader of the Illuminati and appointed Lenin and Trotsky to fill the void in Europe. With this being done, Marx and Engles moved the International Communist Headquarters to New York City, where it remains to this day at the Headquarters of the Chase Manhatten Bank at 1 Karl Marx Square, and began turning America into the 3rd great empire, after the Roman and British to finish off the enslavement of the world on behalf of Rome. Now that this is complete they are in the process of destroying America, just as they did with the Roman and British when they were done using them. Once this same entity were able to pass the Federal Reserve Act on Dec, 23, 1913, this gave them complete control of America's finances, and within 6 months WW I, which plunged American's into debt at a monolithic pace that it will never recover from, although 10,000 of them ant their compatriots became millionaires as they were already set up to profit from a war that had been planned since 1871.
I care not what puppet that is put on the thrown of the empire where the sun never sets. He who controls British money, controls Britain, and I control British money........Nathan Mayer Rothschild, 1815.
These same people are mostly responsible for the creation of Communist Russia and eventually China, and WW II did nothing but help it expand. the cold war after WWII was phoney, but it would justify America sticking their noses in all those countries supposidly to stop the spread of Communism, and now all those countries they stuck their noses in are Communist or Socialist cesspools.
Let me know if you have any questions about any wars and why they were actually fought.
May have to read Sutton and see how his perceptions align with Gunther Reinmann who wrote "The Vampire Economy".
Thanks for the video. Like yourself, I am not totally convinced of everything Sutton says in his books (and there were a few times he did overthink on certain issues such as psychotronics), but he did ask a lot of interesting questions throughout his career and he has drawn attention to some important historical truths a lot of historians are still unable to recognise (the capitalism vs socialism doctrine has seriously blinded historians and students in regards to Sutton's books like The Best Enemy Money Can Buy).
I haven't read Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler for years (read it through twice), but I can recommend additional sources of interest (all of them having come to their own conclusions with no mention of Sutton's research from what I remember):
--- The Corporation documentary features a section of the relationship between American corporations and the Nazis, which did carry on in World War Two. Among the interviewees were Noam Chomsky, Edwin Black, Peter Drucker and Michael Moore
--- Trading with the Enemy by Charles Higham
--- IBM & the Holocaust and Nazi Nexus by Edwin Black
--- The American Axis: Henry Ford and the Nazis by Max Wallace
For about the first 5 minutes it sounded plausible, but I am glad you came to the same conclusion as me. It's a classic case of taking a theory and then trying to shoehorn them into the facts. This is poor acedemic work and suffers from a lack of peer review. Just because 2 groups have convergent goals, does not mean they have common backers. Also I fundamentally disagree with your comment on the EU, but this is not relevant to this story. IG got American money as it had an American arm, no great surprise. I don't see how wall street would benefit from a countries setting up autarkic/vampire economies where their investment could be seized at the whim of the governments of Germany and the Soviet Union - for example.
The one theory that does hold water is that of the Standard Oil scandal, where post war the CEO stated that the needs of the shareholder trump those of the state, when he was accused of supplying the enemy - which they undoubtedly were. No charges were made, but all those families got a choke hold on political power - so no surprise.
Hey TIK, loved the video amazing work as always! Would it be possible for you to provide the link to the website first displayed at 4:12?
I found it on Reddit a while ago but not sure which post. So I've uploaded it here for you drive.google.com/file/d/1LtnEd8jXaAY0HnnwMIGOHTBj01bt6GAf/view?usp=sharing
@@TheImperatorKnight Thanks so much!
Anthony Sutton, respect ❤️
Love the video as always. I am getting back into history. Does anybody got any good sources on early history because I wanna start there and work my way to present.
If Sutton wrote his books in the current climate, he would be scapegoated as a conspiracy theorist, cancelled and driven out of polite society.
Everyone who does not agree w/ the gov or media these days is called nazi and/or " conspiracy theorist" 🙃