Astronomers Just Saw The Farthest Galaxy To Date But There's A Problem
Vložit
- čas přidán 16. 04. 2022
- Astronomers have spotted the most distant galaxy found to date, named HD1. The highly redshifted galaxy lies 13.5 billion light years from Earth. The present proper distance to HD1, which also considers the expansion of the universe, is 33.4 billion light years. The far-flung galaxy was discovered using four powerful optical and infrared telescopes after 1200 hours of observing time and searching through 700,000 objects.
But there's something typical about the HD1 galaxy that is not making sense to astronomers. This fourth episode of the Sunday Discoveries Series explains this breakthrough in detail.
RESEARCH PAPERS:
Research Paper 1: arxiv.org/pdf/2201.00823.pdf
Research Paper 2: arxiv.org/pdf/2112.09141.pdf
REFERENCES:
Starburst Galaxies: bit.ly/3EkDCKD
Star Formation Rate: bit.ly/3vsjNNe
Lyman-break Galaxies: bit.ly/3uOSn59
Created By: Rishabh Nakra
Narrated By: Jeffrey Smith
Produced By: Rishabh Nakra
All episodes of the series: bit.ly/369kG4p
Basics of Astrophysics series: bit.ly/3xII54M
The Secrets of the Universe on the internet:
Website: bit.ly/sou_website
Facebook: bit.ly/sou_fb
Instagram: bit.ly/sou_ig
Twitter: bit.ly/sou_twitter - Věda a technologie
It’s weird to think everything we are talking about was already so long ago. In actuality, we have no clue what is there. We are just watching shadows of what once was.
and they are looking at earth when the dinosaurs roamed
Mind blowing
@@mIrOkAkKO no we can't
the light of what once was
I'd like to see the universe now XD we need time travel with space travel
So what we are seeing is light from a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.
Excellent.
Pretty much, and not to scare you but, most of the stars seen in the sky today have either died or fell out the universe into the void, so really its just darkness outside the galaxy, we are seeing things billions of lightyears ago
@@Chill_yz No, those stars were destroyed by Darth Vader and the Empire in an effort to root out the rebel scums.
Taaah TAAah Tah tah Tah tAAAh Tah, Tah Tah Tah tAAAh Tah nananah
Directed by George Lucas
@@CurrentlyOnLV-426 IS THAT BITE OF 87 REFERENCE
I can't wrap my head around this...unreal...seeing something so far back in time
All distances in mainstream cosmology are wrong.
It seemed like it was happening now
@@chinmay1958 roasted him lol
That is not what the universe looks like⚜️
Light is incredible, it in this case travelled so far and we can still “see” it.
The fact that we are actually looking back in time is astonishing. The scale of the universe is just too much to comprehend. There is definitely intelligent life out there, the immense distance between planets In our own galaxy is too much to ever travel, never mind between galaxies, especially that, theoretically, any speed in excess of the speed of light is not feasible. 100x the speed of light is still “slow” for inter-galaxy travel, even to slow to another quadrant in our own galaxy. Hopefully the “wormhole” theory that has been brought up is actually true, and one day in our future the “Star Trek” scenario may hold true.
Its actually physically impossible for there to be life out there, regardless of how big the universe is.
The odds against life out there are astronomical. For life to suddenly appear and survive, it would instantly need a mechanism by which to replicate itself. Like DNA. And that takes a very long time to evolve.
@@97goat02Then why is there life here?
Everyone in this thread is wrong. There is no guarantee that there is other life, and there is no guarantee that there is. The fact that we exist is one data point, which essentially tells us nothing except for the fact that it is possible. It could be 1 in trillions or 1 in 50. But OP is right in that it likely doesn't matter regardless, because we almost certainly will never be able to reach them, or them us, unless the laws of physics in which we know them are broken.
@@waynemerlo7448 intelligent design
I think the James Webb will in fact not see the early stages of the universe but will just see billions of more galaxies and prove that the universe is much older than astronomers believe it to be. Like what always happens....just when you think you know the universe, it gets bigger.
At the very least.
The more we know, the more we realise we know very little
@@feedayeen Thanks for the input. JWT will see the earliest galactic formation.
@@feedayeen The problem with JWT is the resolution. A backyard telescope is better in visual light than JWT is in IR. The IR spectrum is much wider than visible light. Because of JWT cryogenic properties, it has a much higher sensitivity than large earth based telescopes. We have a lot to learn about the early universe and the properties of the galactic center.
@@feedayeen Thanks for the technical reply. I have a lot to learn about photons. They are of a very fascinating subject. It is something I have trying to mentally envision all my life. Photons are spooky little critters. I had not heard of the Maximum angular diameter distance before. I just found an article in the Oxford Royal Astronomical Society on the subject.
@@oldmech619 The resolution in visible light is not the issue, the cameras are infrared but can also see red and yellow. If a visible range camera was put on JWST then its resolution would be on a par with Hubble due to it's larger size and far better than any backyard telescope (if you change the reflective coating on the mirrors).
The most fascinating thing about astronomy is the fact that what we are seeing are images from the past. Significant time passes before the light from those far object reaches us which means we could never see what is currently happening to those object. Only thing we could see is how they look like from the past when the light emitted from them started it's long journey to reach us.
yeah, but from their side of the telescope they've been watching us since we were born !!
So earth’s age is 4 Bn years and this is visible through light that travelled 13.4 Bn years ago. Mind numbing 😢
Not only our Sun, but a star was born and went supernova to create the material that the Earth is made out of. 😵💫
In recent findings they found that our galaxy is as old as the universe. Born just 800 mn years after the universe.
Nah b next week the earth will be 6 billion years old
Its doesn't work that way ...but u r donky
For me it's actually mind numbing for an opposite reason. The earth is about 4.6B years old while the universe is about 13.7B years old. That means that the universe is only about 3 times as old as the earth, despite being vastly bigger in size.
When the earth was born, the universe was only 2/3 as old as it is now. Meaning that the universe is actually really an infant, and we are one of the earliest generations of planets.
Incredible to think of the true vastness of space
We can see visible parts of space and do calculations for size and distance. We can visulize yards, meters, kilometers, miles, etc, but can we truly comprehend the distance that billions of light-years is? Not really.
@@LuvBorderCollies it's insane to even imagine infinity, that's why I think the universe is only a make believe mega fantasy 💥 🤔 🤗 but I love it ❗😀
And to realize you're literally incapable of even truly realizing how big our galaxy is. Likely human minds are incapable of truly comprehending the vastness of our own solar system Imo but that's just speculation.
Ha! You haven't seen my backyard, yet.
Yes, you might think it's a long way to the shop, but space is really big.
3:17 "Now this means there are some highly energetic events taking place in HG1..."
I believe the proper sentence is; "Now this means there were some highly energetic events which took place in HG1..." since we can never know what is 'currently' taking place in HG1.
It's still somewhat correct to say that they are happening. Since we can only observe the Galaxy at its distance from us (due to Space-Time) the events that *did* happen there are happening *now* for us. So while the events are in the past technically speaking; what we see is what's happening there now for us. That Galaxy may very well be long since dead, but since it's light from 13 billion Ly ago is what we're seeing, that's what's happening for us. Time is a very interesting concept. All it really is, is a measure of distance conceptualized by Mankind. Helps us understand things, but in the grand scheme, it may not mean much at all.
I Dunno Maybe We Are Seeing The Birth Of That Galaxy?
@@jokercard98 Geez that is so weird to wrap your brain around. The more I think about it the more wtf moments my brain has xD Space is so cool but scary sheesh :D
It makes you think if aliens existed and they learned we measured distance by light, they’d all laugh and call us primitive.
Astronomy teacher here. I am totally amazed for the JWST's discovery and so pleased with the way you explained it.
I still don't 'get it' = ? at the "Big Bang" was "everything" shot from a single point like a bullet ?
Is the telescope 'looking down the barrel' ....?
iow, was the BB an explosion/expansion in 1 direction ?
OR, was the BB in " all directions " ?
If 'things/galaxies' are all going in "all directions" then there are galaxies at least twice as far away from us as from the 'center' 'beginning' ...? (iow are we only looking in a line straight back to the 'point' of the beginning 'event' and 'we cannot' or 'have not yet' looked 'beyond /to other direction'.
Can we look in the direction we're headed ??? Is this telescope just a 'rear view mirror' ?
I feel like I'm on a Flying Wheel at a carnival being looked at under a microscope !
Wouldn't it be cool to be able to see and/or experience every habitable planet in the universe.
The *Entire Universe?*
I think just the part of actually doing that would take far longer than the rest of someone's life.
If there is something really amazing to them out there, they could die of old age before reaching that selection.
I am assuming you have a concrete, back and white definition of what makes a planet "habitable", with no ambiguity. 🤔
@@TheNoiseySpectator Bro, He said "wouldn't it be cool" in a hypothetical sense, not in a practical sense, just like how a child would say "Imagine if humans could fly", He didn't say it was possible for us to do this nor theorise how we could do this, He just said wouldn't it be cool. So please take your salt somewhere else.
@@TheNoiseySpectator he was being speculative and imaginative
And nah it won't take too long, maybe not in our life time but in our life time we will be seeing the stepping stones towards the grand travel
If we can find a way to move fast enough so it won't take us 40 lifetimes to get to our closest habitable planet we'll be seeing humans in space very soon. But let's just leave it to the good Ole musk to take care of that
@@alexei3755 I suppose so. 😊
But, I don't think "Cool" would be enough. I tgink it would be astounding!
@@prime9624 Well, in that case, I agree with him, but I don't think "cool" would adequately cover what it would be like. 😍
There are galaxies that is so far away that light haven't even reached yet. Anything is literally possible out there
The galaxy’s may not even be there anymore because we are seeing it so far in the past because of how far the light has to travel to reach us
@@christiancolarusso5835 or other universes are being born or some are in the middle of their lifespan
It’s mind boggling to think that this all is just within the “observable universe”.
Observable universe is just 1 layer.... there are 7...
Each layer is 500 years away so humans can never even reach end of the first ...too far away will take 500 light years subhanAllah
was always enthusiastic about these type of content... thank you always for giving us the knowledge
We talk in the present tense of very ancient history. We don't know what changes have occurred, nor do we know what really remains.
At least we know what will happen, in the future.
Correct these galaxy’s may not even be here anymore because we’re seeing it so far in the past if we went of HD1 and looked at the solar system it wouldn’t even be a thing yet
@@christiancolarusso5835 and The Star's will Fall from Heaven and be Rolled Up like a Scroll !
I've always been a "map guy". By that I mean, ever since a very early age, one of my enjoyable pastimes was to peruse the pages of an atlas and just wonder, what was going on at that place right now?
When I look at a picture of the "available" universe, as for example, depicted in screen-freeze at 0:52, I can't help but be totally awestruck at the considerations of what may be out there.
It is so incredibly humbling to see a picture, sitting in my house, on a computer screen, of places that are so far beyond my imagination, it's almost difficult to cope with.
I sincerely hope that we find concrete evidence of alien life before I die. It would give me a profound feeling of satisfaction to know it was accomplished while I'm still sucking air.
I used to lay down and look at the stars and wonder what was going on around them. I do the same on google space, put on some music and just spend a few hours looking around.
That is awesome, I sat back and looked at that deep field picture and even though I understand how large of an area and how many possible planets with life could be in there it still amazes me every time… it is so amazing how large things are I wish I could experience it for myself
Jeff the map guy
u can have the knowledge of the universe if u have the link to the one who made it
@@mickdan19 there was no "one" who made it though, no gods are real.
This means that the galaxy's shape we are observing now was 13 billion years ago and if we want to know the present shape of the galaxy then we will have to wait for 13 billion years or more because as the time passes the galaxy is moving farther than it is now.
Too bad our Sun and Solar System won't exist anymore in 13 billion years.
The eerie thing is, if there was life in that galaxy, they've could've looked at the Milky Way and wondered the same things about our galaxy.
Maybe they're messing with our elections !!!🙃
Nah because our galaxy is way younger
Now I have some questions... if the reshift is due to the galaxy moving away from us, and the galaxy is 13 Billion LY from us.... then the light is reaching us from 13 B years ago. So, we are not seeing the age of the galaxy now, but we are seeing what it looked like 13 B years ago. It's like trying to figure out what someone looks like based on baby photos. We know the object is old because of its distance, but we are not witnessing it in its old state. So is the 100 stars a year more reasonable for a new galaxy?
Galaxies contain hundreds of globular clusters. A globular cluster contains millions of stars.
Redshift isn't due to the galaxy moving away from us, it's due to the stretching of light which is caused by an object moving away from us.
i’m very mentally and physically ill, so having motivation to keep going some days is extremely challenging. i was once wrongly declared terminal, it’d be extremely hard for me to see the JWST even complete construction. now, most of my health issues are mental, but astronomy keeps me going, because if u told me i’d be able to look at that galaxy, a black hole AND decently understand particle physics id ask u what ouid you’re smoking
Its amazing how they can see that tiny speck in space yet can't seem to find the 9th planet in our solar system EVEN AFTER New Horizons took a picture of it
New horizons took a picture of Pluto, not the ninth planet. And galaxies produce a heck of a lot more light than Pluto
There’s one theory that all of the super massive black holes like the one at the center of our galaxy formed during the early hot dense universe. This black hole seems to support that theory although the exact process of how they formed is not known.
I do think it's a quasar
@@spacestation2689 if it was a quasar it would be emitting something, which it is not
The original black holes would have formed the same way stars do. Its just they were so massive they collapsed directly into a blackhole.
All a black hole is, is a star so dense that its gravity overpowers the speed of light.
I would guess that it is extremely bright inside of a blackhole.
@@falseprophet1024 That's an interesting thought.
It’s actually insane that the universe is so large that we see what objects looked like in the past. Some of those galaxies could have life in them, but we’d never know because they’re expanding away from us at a faster rate than light speed
How does one prove that light doesn't redshift due to losing energy due to moving across space instead of being stretched by expansion of universe.
Or are we sure that light is vibration of space?
So it's not GNZ-11 anymore? What? Imagine what other so far galaxies might be discovered.. Amazing yet scary at the same time.
Imagine also that James Webb can see WAY beyond that
Now when I look up in the sky I know that the stars that appear in the sky may not be actually there. But even after so many light years they are still decorating our present sky. It's amazing, wierd and scary all at the same time. The concept of time is different in space .How wonderful our Creator of the universe is.
What’s really crazy is we don’t know if any of this is actually correct this is all basically assumptions and theory where we connected the dots to have some type of understanding
100% correct R H. Man wrote the computer programs these telescopes etc use to tell us what they see out there so everything man claims these telescopes "see" may or may not be real. We simply BELIEVE it is real as that to date is the extent of our knowledge. That is why they keep inventing black holes, quasars etc to explain the things they know nothing about yet try to tell us it is all fact. Laughable really.
Wouldn't measuring an object at 13.4 billion light years away only describe the object at that time and not where it is now?
Correct, hence these far away galaxies lets us explore the early time of the universe.
I'm so glad this information was shared with us, I can finally resume my life on earth.
Great information
Glad you liked it
In how far do these deviations from what would be normally expected reflect on matters such as quantum theory and theories about the beginning of the universe? Very curious here.
I love to hear about these galaxies far,far,far,far, away but most of these things are too deep.
As observers of the present, we find ourselves permanently trapped within the past.
It’s freaky that what we are seeing was long before humans or even the dinosaurs existed
If the distance between HD1 and us is increasing rapidly, may I assume that at some point, it won't be detectable?
They say energy can not be destroyed, I think even extremely red shifted visible light truly never just disappears, micro or gamma rays is the results which we can't see but can detect and convert into visible imagery...??
I just thought the same and it is not only HD1. In the distant future maybe we wont be able to see most of the galaxy due to universe expansion.
This is a cool video on the subject that I remember watching.
czcams.com/video/kZ3M6ko9pes/video.html
At some point the expansion of the universe will redshift light such that the wavelength is larger than the cosmic horizon, and one would need a detector the size of the observable universe to resolve information. So yes eventually the light will be undetectable.
@@hexium_ makes sense
When you see pictures of space. The red objects are the furtherst. I always notice those first. It's very intriguing
This world needs new younger leaders. Old ones close to death aren’t scared of death and are making decisions for everyone, we need to focus on space and human expansion and not war within our own planet
I am in love with THE SECRETS OF THE UNIVERSE. I don't really comment a lot, but I thought I would be too cruel if I don't mention it. I have watched almost every single video of the channel. I am looking forward to remove the 'almost' from it.
I’m looking forward to remove every communist from Earth
I just starting watching a bit ago, and I too am in love with the channel.
For reference, we are looking at this galaxy as it existed only 200 million years after the beginning of time. The solar system didn't even exist yet.
nice
have you noticed though that no matter which galactic video you watch, invariably whenever they show galactic pics they show it in slow-motion and add slow surreal meditative music?
I guess you need to start a podcast. Very informative!
such a calm voice..
i love it.
One question, might sound stupid but if this galaxy was already that far away that long ago wouldn’t it be so much further as of right now?
Yes assuming it hasn't already merged with another one.
2:27
We see the galaxy 13 billion years ago yes it has moved and changed it has moved In 13 billion years and that is the Milky Way we are looking at
Always awesome content
My thoughts after learning some examples and what Light year actually is: "That's the past right there. A long long time ago. And we're standing here from their future. Maybe some galaxy have already mashed with milky way and we dont even know about it yet, or maybe earth is already in its apocalyptic stage if we get to see other life forms from other worlds."
Love the content!!
Thank you!!
Is there a video explaining how they figure the distance, just seems so crazy that we know how far away that stuff is
Because of the red shift
@@SahilP2648 and how does that let us count such great distance? I think a video would be interesting how they figure it out. I know things that are closer they use mathematics to figure the distance but at a certain distance they use the red light, but how does that translate into such and such light years away.
@@AB-mg5sx search on CZcams about 'Doppler effect' which relates to sound then search about 'Red shift'. Both are the same in principle. Visible light gets shifted to larger and larger wavelengths the farther away the object is moving from us. That's the reason why JWST has the biggest sensor designed around infrared light.
@@SahilP2648 ok, thank you I will search for that. :)
@@Boobasweat awesome
Not only is the distance astonishing and impossible to comprehend, but the fact the universe is expanding with no idea why or how.
thats so crazy, we’re looking back in time
When you look at your feet, they’re really 5 billionths of a second back in time.
It's seems we know everything about the universe but nothing about the other side of the moon. 🤔
What if Hubble's law is wrong? What if redshift is caused by gas, dust and gravity fields cause the redshift instead?
I agree!!
Red and blue shifting is a property of space-time and waves in general. All waves will exhibit a shift in their wavelength respective to their direction and rate of acceleration, and due to the inverse square law the duration of propagation. High gravitational fields and obstacles along the way may work to reduce the wave’s energy and decrease its wavelength, this may result in a much greater red shift than what would have otherwise been detected.
I just learned this in a lecture a couple of weeks back- My explanation won’t be great so sorry about that. It is true that the interstellar medium can result in some reddening due to scattering and absorption. However, we can actually see through this by using different wavelengths. Gas and dust only interact with particular wavelengths of light (I don’t remember exactly where on the EM spectrum this is). So we can see through this by looking at different wavelengths which aren’t affected by this.
@@troops3293The longer the wavelength the farther it can travel without absorption, infrared is what they measure to see through dense gas and dust regions of space.
@@hexagonmagnetics569 that’s the one, thanks for the assist 🤝
Great content
Delivered well 👍
Look at that red shift! Am I understanding the further away an object is the more red it is?
Crazy to think life could be out there but we wouldn't even know yet, not for a million or billion years... probably will keep us from ever even knowing unless it's in our galaxy
Even crazier when you consider things like filters.
Life may be long dead out there. We may get lucky enough to witness a technological civilization, then find out it's been dead for millions of years
yeah, and this galaxy is filled with nothing but hillbillys!
Now imagine that galaxy was moving away at the speed of light, it would be 27B light years away by now.
Because of the expansion of space it might even be further
It's actually moving away faster than the speed of light.
Thank you for using the word "Farthest" and not "Furthest." The former should be used when distance is involved.
Don't let the "liberals" get their hands on this. I will be something else irrational all together.
And just think. After all this time and everything we’ve discovered and all the huge scientific breakthroughs, we’ve probably still only studied 0.000000000001% of the universe. It’s absolutely mind boggling.
So how long did it take the big bang to explode?
Time did not exist until it was already 10^-43 seconds old. That is plank time.
love these videos ... but watching them at night gives me an existiential crisis, lol
It's not about the distance that makes it hard to tell what's going on in the galaxy. It's that what we are seeing happened 13.5 billion years ago, or about 9 billion years before Earth existed. The galaxy in question, in theory, might not even exist anymore, but it would certainly currently be much much different than what we are seeing.
Everyone in the comment be like: This is unreal and life changing to me
While me: ketchup in space
We should make a wormhole telescope so we don't have to wait for the light .
5:19 its a "young" galaxy not "old", it is 13.5 bil LY away which means it is 13.5 bil years back in the timeline when you see it.
Yes what we are seeing is young but in reality it’s old
@@benjaminraymundo6711 problem is, you are assessing the young appearance hence what it does back in the time, not what it is doing at the moment so its still a young one lol
@@benjaminraymundo6711 and this video is talking about its image not its reality??
Is all the way around earth into space history or can we look into galaxies which are in the future too?
@@ferdinandhevita649 info travels at light speed. lets say the galaxy send the info called day 1 at 10 L.Y away from earth, it means that day 1 info takes 10 years to travel to earth and what we view at the moment we get the data is 10 years ago of the thing. same principle for any further objects
I find this stuff endlessly fascinating.🌌😆✌🏼
amazing as always
Thank you 🙏
You’re welcome 😊
I hope they first point the new telescope at the closest bodies. You know places we might be able to go to some day.
Ture, I'd like some HD images of planets orbiting nearby stars.
This is tremendously in educational and I find it to be intriguing mysterious with a lot of research and development from last time developmental space station continuity
The title seems a bit clickbaity but it was good enough I'll watch another episode.
There’s gotta be life out there this is incredible
We won’t be able to see it because it’s far in the past
That's what they want you to believe
@@aliciabazemore9824 have you been to space before? 👉🏻👈🏻
To me what is of most interest regarding the new James Webb telescope is what it sees at the theoretical moment of the big bang. If it sees mature and old galaxies its goodbye to the big bang theory, and a new infinite universe model being adopted.
Big Bang never happened. You can't get solids from 2 gasses colliding. Besides that, where did those 2 gasses come from if there was nothing before them?
1) NO telescope can see "the moment of the big bang". Light didn't even begin to permeate the universe until several hundred thousand years afterwards.
2) We ALREADY have instruments that can see closer to the Big Bang than JWST can. JWST is mainly an Infra-red telescope, so it can't see as far back in time as a microwave telescope.
The Planck Observatory mission in 2009 made the most accurate map of the Cosmic Microwave Background (the "1st light" after the big bang), 370,000 years after the Big Bang.
For the same reason that Hubble can't see as far as JWST (the far away visible light has shifted to the Infra-red due to universal expansion), the REALLY far light beyond that has shifted into the microwave wavelengths. So JWST can't see as far "back in time" as a microwave telescope can (like the Planck Observatory did in 2009-2013).
@@beta_cygni1950 1)No telescope can see that far into the past according to the big bang theory. Assuming the big bang theory is correct.
2) The microwave background radiation makes more sense as the limiting temperature of space heated by starlight than as the remnant of an explosion. There is no need for the fantastical inflation theory to fudge away the cosmological problem. the infinite universe model fits the thermodynamic equilibrium we see without any need for fudges.
@@paulsmith1981 Sorry, but anyone who calls the Big Bang "an explosion" doesn't understand it enough to try to dispute the theory. Nothing "exploded".
And no, the infinite universe model doesn't solve anything.
I suggest that you read about the topic. It sounds like you don't understand it it all.
@@beta_cygni1950 An explosion is a sudden outburst of energy or a sudden increase in the amount. Cosmologist call the big bang an explosion hence the "bang" in the name.
Saying, Oh no it doesn't. And, I suggest you read a book. Isn't an honourable exit strategy from a debate.
"there are some highly energetic events happening in HD1"... well, there WERE highly energetic events happening 13.5 billion years ago.
Every millisecond of light we're receiving from far away galaxies, is a filmstrip of the universe
been a few billion years, doubt its still there. galaxies are moving quick.
Can you explain me the concept of how this works like how looking far in space results in looking far back in time?
@@azizaamin7867 Sister as far as I know
Light years mean the time that light takes to travel
So 13.5 billion light years mean that light took 13.5 billion years to travel to us
Meaning we are seeing an image of it which was 13.5 billion years ago
Correct me if I am wrong
Assalamualaikum
We could be looking at planets that have intelligent life but are so far away we’re viewing the light from the planet 1000’s of years in the past before they became an advanced civilisation. And they could be doing the same to us. But both of us can’t see our planets in the present day.
It’s lonely and sad to think about
The Antenna galaxies be having infinite stamina for all that starbursting lmao.
Excellent.. anyone knows the name of the background music?!
When exactly is the J. Webb telescope starting to fully operate??
In June-July it should be fully operational
@@madsschorjlnerjrgensen2217 thanks! Maybe it'll show us the cosmos is much older in other regions hidden from Hubble's reach. 😀
@@theinspector7882 Do have in mind, that it might be postponed, like the launch had been a few times.
I sure hope so too. It's gonna be good.
@@madsschorjlnerjrgensen2217 ... right. Do you know how long does an order take to reach the 🔭 and receive back its answer?
I honestly can't wait for the results, I truly belive we will astonished with what we see
Curious if the known universe is equal in length as we know it in ever direction from us.. How do we know that galaxy is moving away from us and not that our Galaxy is moving away from it or possibly originated from it? 🤔
Yes. Just where are we in this universe? Are we at the beginning, in the middle, on the far left/right, north/sth/est/wst etc etc etc. Nothing they tell us answers anything and simply creates even bigger questions they cannot answer.
Yet, they KNOW. They Know NOTHING. All they are doing is speculating based on knowledge that is in its infancy.
@@saintsone7877 Even their knowledge is speculations. It’s quite humorous to watch and see. I find it interesting that they know the density of planets they have never been on and know the composition of these planets and yet our own planet composition as far as the mantle and layers are still speculation since we haven’t been able to drill or observe the deep down.
@@gravityracergt Exactly mate. I believe the furtherest they have drilled down into the earths surface is the Kola Superdeep Borehole, the deepest manmade hole on Earth and deepest artificial point on Earth. The 40,230ft-deep (12.2km) yet so-called scientists tell us the exact composition of the earth right down to the core. They have absolutely NO idea what is under Earths crust and it is all total speculation. As for composition of planets etc again pure science fiction.
Ask why no telescope sent to space has taken a picture of earth in all its glory. They take pictures of planets etc from a close distance yet never take a picture of Earth except from millions of miles away where Earth appears as a dot with an arrow pointing to it saying "we are here". Yet these telescopes send back clear pictures of every planet except Earth. Just what are they hiding and WHY?
Because all galaxies seem to be moving away from each other
@@wabbitseason80085 Voyager and other observation telescopes have never taken a picture of earth from the same distance they take pictures of other planets deliberately. Why did they not take a picture/video of earth from 100,000 miles away so we could see earth clearly. Why? They do that for all other planets but not earth?
Saw the thumbnail, either that’s the Red Star of the old Mata Nui Robot, or The Atlas, from Eissentam.
“We’re just in the beginning part of space. We haven’t been to outer space yet.”
-Oscar
I've been living my life with science and faith. It's exciting to see what's out there and discover more. However there's a beauty and sadness to it. And at the end of the day, who am I to say that we're not alone.
I'm with you
the cosmic dance of shiva!
The universe is 13.8 billion years old, wouldn't the galaxy need to be moving 3× the speed of light relative to us when factoring the expansion of space?
Do you have a robot that codes from F=m*a*a? The SOST can run properly with F=m*a^2.3
And they know this how?? 🙄
Shouldn't we see many galaxies from that epoch given the universe was much smaller..they should be everywhere you could think
Elohim so loved the world,(Cosmos) that he gave his only begotten son.
It's like guessing the nationality of a ship from the flag it flies, while being far away ashore, with the vessel in the middle of a gale and dense fog. One can see some colors and shapes of the flag bit not entirely. So it's ultimately a long game of analysis and exclusion of implausible scenarios." SO BASICALLY THEY DONT KNOW WTF THEIR LOOKING AT!!
I think about the double slit experiment and how photons changes it's behavior by us simply observing it & whether it matters when we look back in time to the light being emitted from a far galaxy
damn
One of the untested assumptions in all of this is that a photon can travel for billions of years without losing any of its original frequency , the only way its frequency can change is through doppler effect.
This assumption cannot be tested and yet its being accepted as a fact.
Photon has no mass. Since expansion is faster than the photon, forever, or at least as long as there is space to travel in. Given that there are objects of mass in space, this path will curve, so I guess eventually it has to contact the mass, unless the mass moves beyond the light cone (due to expansion), then we are back to as long as expansion allows.
@@BatMan-oe2gh yes , that's the untestable assumption that's being treated as fact.
Here's the problem , if photons aren't the perfectly massless perpetual motion machines that the Standard Model says they are then "dark energy" disappears.
Is it actually untested?
@@sadham2668 It's impossible to test .
Photons appear to have no mass , but we can't verify if they are truly massless or if the have so little mass we just can't measure it.
If they have any mass at all it would mean their frequency would slowly drift down over millions of years , basically adding extra red-shift to distant galaxies and causing an error in our calculations.
That error would look just like "Dark Energy".
So there is either some unknown force ripping the Universe apart or the Standard Model is wrong about photons having absolutely no mass.
The physics community is so wrapped up in the Standard Model most of them won't even consider that it might be wrong.
@@glennchartrand5411 wait really?
The Antennae Galaxies merging isn’t that unusual, because in fact even our own Milky Way galaxy is merging with the Andromeda Galaxy. It should actually be pretty well known by now.
we are not currently merging with the andromeda galaxy...and wont be for a long while.. we got 5billion years to go.
Lmao 🤣 sry to burst your bubble, but we are not merging with Andromeda..yet..we still got some billions of years to go lol
The merger with Andromeda won't happen for billions of years.
Do you ever wonder that since what telescopes see is the immeasurable past that we might just be seeing ourselves?
How is it immeasurable if telescopes are measuring it?
Lol I just said that in another reply that galaxy has moved to this point where we are now and we are looking at the Milky Way 13 billion years ago
How absolutely incredible!!!😮
Amazing and beautiful are the cosmos. I think the universe it too big for any 1 civilization to have mapped and traversed it. With galaxies already so huge as they are, TRILLIONS make it likely impossible. I get so astonished and mesmerized looking to the stars, the cosmos so vast, dark and beautiful, yet so bright to be near the stars. Trying to imagine and comprehend the distances between as I look to the night sky, bewildered and mind boggling. They're so bright and huge celestial bodies up close, yet mere glimmering specks of light to us being that they're so far away. And the fact of the time it takes the best seemingly instant light taking so many years to get here being onky few in small bubble area to us amongst the so many times more within the Galaxy. But even trying to imagine the distances and even greater numbers of galaxies simply within the 'visible' universe with many many times more than stars within our Galaxy and all galaxies. And the galaxies so big it's like they've been called 'island universes'. Absolutely no way we are alone.
All this is just our theory, take it with a grain of salt
Imagine when someone far away looks at our planet they will see probably see the Triassic period
What's the background music used in this video?
(Job 38:1-4) 38 Then Jehovah answered Job out of the windstorm: 2 “Who is this who is obscuring my counsel And speaking without knowledge? 3 Brace yourself, please, like a man; I will question you, and you inform me. 4 Where were you when I founded the earth? Tell me, if you think you understand.
(Job 38:31-33) 31 Can you tie the ropes of the Kiʹmah constellation Or untie the cords of the Keʹsil constellation? 32 Can you lead out a constellation in its season Or guide the Ash constellation along with its sons? 33 Do you know the laws governing the heavens, Or can you impose their authority on the earth?
(Isaiah 40:25, 26) 25 “To whom can you liken me to make me his equal?” says the Holy One. 26 “Lift up your eyes to heaven and see. Who has created these things? It is the One who brings out their army by number; He calls them all by name. Because of his vast dynamic energy and his awe-inspiring power, Not one of them is missing.
Powerful
Amennnnnnnnnnnnnn, hallelujah
I have to say I've never bought this theory about what we think about the universes "beginning". We just sent up this monster that can see things we couldn't see before because it is so far away but we are supposed to accept the idea that they know the universe has its outer limits.
I think the simpleton mind of the sons of man have to explain things as having a start and an end. The idea that the universe could have existed forever isn't even talked about. So how much " dead nothing exists? I mean if the universe is expanding it has to occupy space that had nothing in it so it can grow. Then they will say that on the outer edges it grows quicker, something attributed to this " big bang". Without proof of an "edge" to the universe we pill on to a theory that could be flawed and those limitations in thinking will hold back sons of man from discovering the true nature of the cosmos.
Doing the best we can
well you go explore space then so you can show us how easy it is Mr. professional
The universe doesn’t have an edge though (at least we think so), it’s infinite. It has an “edge” because that’s the maximum distance we can see. That’s why it’s called the observable universe. Beyond the edge is likely the rest of the universe. But since light takes forever to travel and the universe is expanding. We’ll probably won’t see far past it. I guess you could say the universe did exist forever. The Big Bang wasn’t an expansion, it’s more like the universe just appeared.
The most scary thing is the fact that we are seeing the light which actually left the galaxy 13.6 billion years ago. We will never know what it is actually there right now
one of these days we're gonna see an out of pocket star destroyer in one of those pics