Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos czcams.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D.html Please click the link to watch our other Chinese Systems videos czcams.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LoJXFBUYN75biwfUhMq1osE.html Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos czcams.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LpFkS9hH3KD9uTEKBDVQZRp.html
PLA does not rely on a single weapon. ZTL-11 was created to serve the needs of medium weight combined brigades. BTW, the next generation vehicle to replace the ZTL-08 family has entered service.
if something like the ZTL-11 performs the job it was meant to do successfully, why does it need to be flashy and loaded with state-of-the-art technology? Slow and steady wins the race, and perfect is the enemy of good enough.
I love your videos, because they don't just read out stats and dates, but also give context and reasoning, and compare with similar systems. Not just what it has, but some of what it's lacking as well. I would love more videos like that, comparing systems, their advantages and disadvantages, and why they were designed like that.
It was an informative and wonderful video about ZTL - 11wheeled Armored assault vehicle designed by China 🇨🇳 video clearly explained all characteristics of this remarkable vehicle. Also, video labeled to its historical backgrounds and Chinese purposes of designed such as this wheeled armor assault vehicle .. thank you for your respectful 🙏 ( weapon detective 🕵️♂️) channel for sharing this video
Chinese (PRC) military equipment is always interesting to me, because while most of it was originally copied from the USSR, they have had some exposure to Western military equipment. And now in more modern times, some their newer equipment seems to be going their own unique way!
I wish the 'Dakar Rally' would have a class for demilitarized armored vehicles. It would give the manufacturers an opportunity to show their products off, similar to the Paris Air Show.
Fantastic video! I know you like to keep your videos to a short format but I cant help but think this was a bit of a missed opportunity for a longer video taking you through the ZTL chassis family anyways, keep up the good work!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the ZTL-11 feels like it shared an earlier design-sharing with its parent vehicle the 08 than the MGS did with the mainline Stryker
The M8 was certainly not copied. It's development did enter the competition and lost, so the M10 probably has some advantages over the basic M8 concept.
During the fire, intense smoke and temperature occur in the turret. So, the crew generally opens the doors and hatches to release the smoke and get some cooling, especially in training.
Anyone who’s been following Chinas military modernisation has known it exists for years now. It’s basically half the firepower of their medium brigades.
Who knows, maybe it'll be better than the Eastern Block BTR's, then again I'm thinking China should already know that exiting from a tiny door in the center of a stationary armoured vehicle is difficult without a full combat load. Not to mention that the US Army is divesting from the Stryker mobile gun systems in 2022 for many reasons, but most of all because they truly suck.
Yup. Soldiers hated the Stryker. The CCP/PLA does not have a meritocratic system in any area and their procurement system is equally or even more corrupt than Russia’s. I doubt many of the PLA’s platforms have even a third of the capabilities they claim. I’m surprised they’d use the success of a wheeled vehicle in the desert against a disorganized and non-peer enemy as the impetus to develop this thing. That shows a poor analysis to begin with.
You guys are blind or what? The side door is mainly used to load and unload wheels into the turret; nobody said you HAVE to use them. The vehicle has a driver's hatch on the front and three hatchs for the commander, gunner, and loader on the turret top. You basically criticized a design that you invented, and somehow called yourself smart. In the end, it shows your lack of knowledge of military hardware. Also, Stryker MGS sucks because it is a terrible vehicle, not because an assault gun is obsolete; otherwise, why even make M10 Booker, which is also an assault gun.
@@peekaboopeekaboo1165 Kind of dumb to have dedicated land and amphibious type. You can’t move through the woods and then switch to your amphibious model or drive through swamps and then just switch over to your land version.
Where is this appropriate??? Maybe in middle and southern africa and possibly in some parts of mid east----otherwise these things are toast against any real armor, real airpower, and organized and equipped infantry....kinda cool but what do you do with it besides initiating coups in small countrys or an airmobile/marine first strike scenario
The purpose of these equipment is to be light enough and have strong firepower. A complete composite brigade with 400 heavy equipment can be deployed by air within 10 hours to any location within a range of 2000 kilometers.
US may not win peace BUT we can always "redefine" victory. white flags can be binary for flag of victory and hands above heads can be binary for victory dance.
Western equipment is not designed for "show", that's an unfair assessment. They are expensive and not procured in large numbers, that would be a fair assessment.
Same with India India ordered " 300 OT-64A (version fitted with BRDM-2 turret) ordered from Czechoslovakia in 1969 and delivered between 1971 and 1974." TATA copied OT-64A and made Indian version which they called Tata Kestrel.
@@BlackHawkTejas I think copy is the wrong word I would say that they where inspired by them Simular to the Chinese type 96 tank It wasn't a direct copy of the T-72 but you can clearly see how much they share
@@simonwoess5679There is always some one to do propaganda against india usually Pakistanis.. First of all india never purchased any such hardware from czechoslovakia That too in 70s.india.bearly purchased anything from other than soviets. Secondly the tata never designed that kestral its state runned drdo who designed it and gave tech transfer to mahindra , tata, and kalyani defence. Which they made there own more advancements in it and also named differently.. Surely it is very capable and modular as well. This guy should stop doing this propaganda use real name. There is ton of difference in dimensions of tata kestral & oh64
@@Ulatimber 1st Yes India really bought OT-64 APCs he even got the dates and numbers right 2nd Copying and taking inspiration from something are two different things Maybe they just want the Taras take a simular place in the inidian army as the OT-64 therefore the Simular disign 3rd There is absolutely no shame in taking inspection from other countries militaries Even the Russians and Americans copied from other And look at China they have build what might be the 2nd strongest fighting force on the entire planet and until the mid 2010s they haven't produced a single vehicle or aircraft that's not a complete copy and yet today they have can produce more 5th gen fighters year than Russia wants to pruduce in the next 5
@@simonwoess5679we might have brought but I have searched I found nothing about it anyways. I said the dimension are not similar it's not a copy but drdo's own product. And tata has show different tuurets on it with 105mm gun and 30mm as well it has more powerful engine both weights 23-24tons it had 600ho engine compared to type 8 440hp. It is no less than any other platform that's it. And it will be not as expensive as striker as well.
Yes the mobile gun system's advanced and inovative systems like an auto loader. No one has ever used one of those before. For those that don't know, the auto loader was one of the many issues with the MGS, and auto loaders are a common feature on non-US vehicles.
@@kingdedede1066 it was a criticism of the anti-american bias displayed in the video. They made a bad argument that doesn't fit with the analogy made because they let their bias get in the way. Which is too bad as this channel is generally rather good.
@@randomdude4505 it’s true that generally soviet style auto loaders are not as good as human loaders but I think he may have been referring to bustle style autoloaders present in a number of western tanks such as K2 and Leclerc which are superior in many ways to human loaders.
Stop this nonsense of design copy in comment section.. 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️ Though everybody knows if its chinese.. It has been copied or reverse enginered.. 😅😅😅😅 On lighter note of course.. Spread love not hatred u gays 😊
Your dady must have copied it the dimension doesnt look similar how did india got the its data chinese security is so poor . I dont understand how india can copy a 8 Metre machine make it 7.8 m . Its height is 2.1 m but india made it 2.3m . How can this happen, you are so smart to speculate anything,🤓 cant understand basics. China is great at propaganda no doubt about it . Hires Pakistan to do for them and come with real name dude
@@matovicmmilan may be 😂.I Always find some one to demean india usa Chinese enemies basically. And another thing Chinese PPL can't use CZcams but I always find PPL.so much praising china Chinese equipments . Dude gotta watch serpentza !
This "light tank" works in the soft ground of South China and in the steep terrain of Western China. Maybe it's even air droppable. It's far more useful than a 65 ton MBT.
Wild fields in South China is a nightmare for wheeled vehicles, just like paddy fields in Vietnam. The real light tank suitable for southern China is ZTQ15. The only reason ZTL11 (and all 08 variants) works well in the south is because China's extremely well-developed highway network
Ztl 33 zırhlı lastik tekerlekli 10.10 araç üzerine Orhun A4 A5 125mmtank topu zırhlı kulesini enterge ettim 35mm 6namlulu makinalı topu enterge ettim 1500kw lazer topu enterge ettim insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak
Thanks for thinking so highly of China's intelligence agencies that can hack and steal everything every time at will and nothing anyone can do about it lol.
Do you think it looks copied? Then India copied because the ZTL-11 is older (~1200 produced, part of the Type 08 family (~6000 produced)), while the Kestrel is newer (2014-) with just a dozen or so produced.
@@volrathsstronghold copy cheats always support copiers.. just look at all the Chinese machinery, doesn't it Show American or Russian weapons being reverse-engineered.. It won't be a surprise if China Copied India.. because China cannot afford to do shit on its own.. it's whole existence is itself a byproduct of reverse-engineering.. Go argue with someone else kid..🤣🤣
Im pretty sure the ZTL-08 'inspired' by the Terrex ICV of Singapore. if memory serves a batch of Terrex IFVs were impounded in hongkong by the Chinese government for serval months after a Singoporian/Taiwanese exercise. the PLA had 4 months to pore over the vehicles before they returned them.
Hier der Pegasus Galaktica 7 Cyborg Darcho Jandreoski i R.MKD PRESIDENT Kiro Gligorov mi gi prefrlia parite vo GALAKTICA SUPERMAN SD CARD - Kriva Palanka slucaj
Lol sorry😂 British storm shadow missiles failed many times in Russia only himars javelin atgms & Turkish byrakatar TB2s & as well as patriot defence systems where very effective & deadly weapons used by Ukrainians 😂which is I think first level of effective weaponry then includes other different types of weapons from different countries. 😂
8:16 - what do you mean - Ukraine did ;) and they performed poorly ;) 9:49 - what do you mean - US *this century* i.e. since 2000 has had almost no victories - there is only a lone victory over Iraq. US has failed time and time again, constantly loosing wars.
HIMAR ne menja puno na terenu ni storm takodje obicne gluposti Ruse nije zaustavio Himars i nece ih zaustaviti nista od zapadne tehnologije Imaju jednostavno Rusi bolju tehnologiju i vojsku
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
czcams.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D.html
Please click the link to watch our other Chinese Systems videos
czcams.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LoJXFBUYN75biwfUhMq1osE.html
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos
czcams.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LpFkS9hH3KD9uTEKBDVQZRp.html
Looking forward to it but on a different note could you add the Didgori 1-3 to the list of things you will try to cover
@@ansonellis443 Thanks for your interest. We added the Didgori series vehicles to our list.
Make a vedio about ZBD-04A
@@WeaponDetective
Excellent analysis. 👍
PLA does not rely on a single weapon. ZTL-11 was created to serve the needs of medium weight combined brigades. BTW, the next generation vehicle to replace the ZTL-08 family has entered service.
the next gen "09" has been mas produced not yet in service
if something like the ZTL-11 performs the job it was meant to do successfully, why does it need to be flashy and loaded with state-of-the-art technology? Slow and steady wins the race, and perfect is the enemy of good enough.
I love your videos, because they don't just read out stats and dates, but also give context and reasoning, and compare with similar systems. Not just what it has, but some of what it's lacking as well.
I would love more videos like that, comparing systems, their advantages and disadvantages, and why they were designed like that.
And not to mention, total unbiased reporting! Good work! Love your videos! Cheers from Malaysia
不要拿数据说话，1950年。解放军什么都没有，怎么战胜的17国联军？ 武器装备从来不是决定胜利的关键，关键在 人
@@user-yh4wi5ue5k 有苏联的武器。
It was an informative and wonderful video about ZTL - 11wheeled Armored assault vehicle designed by China 🇨🇳 video clearly explained all characteristics of this remarkable vehicle. Also, video labeled to its historical backgrounds and Chinese purposes of designed such as this wheeled armor assault vehicle .. thank you for your respectful 🙏 ( weapon detective 🕵️♂️) channel for sharing this video
Chinese (PRC) military equipment is always interesting to me, because while most of it was originally copied from the USSR, they have had some exposure to Western military equipment. And now in more modern times, some their newer equipment seems to be going their own unique way!
It's a hybrid between the USSR and Allied doctrine
All weapons are interesting it doesn't matter which weapons are better it matters more on how effective it is
@@rickyboy6390 Isn't that what "better" means?
I wish the 'Dakar Rally' would have a class for demilitarized armored vehicles. It would give the manufacturers an opportunity to show their products off, similar to the Paris Air Show.
No but they should definitely have a category off 8x8 custom wheeled vehicles category with more powerful engines than trucks
Another great video !! 👍👍
Cool video as always 🤘
Like many others, i love your presentations. Good subjects and plenty of information😊
Fantastic video!
I know you like to keep your videos to a short format but I cant help but think this was a bit of a missed opportunity for a longer video taking you through the ZTL chassis family
anyways, keep up the good work!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the ZTL-11 feels like it shared an earlier design-sharing with its parent vehicle the 08 than the MGS did with the mainline Stryker
Great video
The M8 was certainly not copied. It's development did enter the competition and lost, so the M10 probably has some advantages over the basic M8 concept.
Great video as usual W D. Daft question, from 8:05 the video shows the ZTL-11 firing with its door open, is there a reason for this?
During the fire, intense smoke and temperature occur in the turret. So, the crew generally opens the doors and hatches to release the smoke and get some cooling, especially in training.
07:33，where this scene come from?
Weird, it doesn't seem to have gun stabilization? None of the videos show stabilization in action.
? You can see the stabilization in this video?
What time can you see the stabilization?@@miguelgil7266
Watch 4:22, play in half speed for 2-3 seconds, you can clearly see the stabilization is on.
Ah yeah, thanks. Was thinking it would be odd if it didn't, must have missed it.@@jxmai7687
Make a vedio about ZBD-04A infantry fighting vehicle
Thanks for tour interest. We added the ZBD-04A to our list.
Thank you
Also make a vedio about z 10 helecopter
As experience with CV-90 show in my country - wheels on battlefield are too fragile. At least in artillery heavy battles.
It depends wheels can be a problem if its muddy terrain but tracked could be a problem too and more maintanance if the tracks jump of .
Excellent video and a very interesting analysis. Indeed, the world unfortunately goes back to the Middle Ages. I hope the sense will win.
Hey
@@Ulatimber Hello, my Indian friend
ZTL-11 is already part of the past! The latest designed armored vehicles in China are being equipped in large quantities.
It def looks cool
what is the full name of the chines copy of the amx 10rc i need to se more pic of that shit
Did anyone know this existed? Being flashy works. A british saying: "A good soldier is who radiates his power."
random chernobyl citizen: 💪
Anyone who’s been following Chinas military modernisation has known it exists for years now. It’s basically half the firepower of their medium brigades.
Who knows, maybe it'll be better than the Eastern Block BTR's, then again I'm thinking China should already know that exiting from a tiny door in the center of a stationary armoured vehicle is difficult without a full combat load. Not to mention that the US Army is divesting from the Stryker mobile gun systems in 2022 for many reasons, but most of all because they truly suck.
Yup. Soldiers hated the Stryker. The CCP/PLA does not have a meritocratic system in any area and their procurement system is equally or even more corrupt than Russia’s. I doubt many of the PLA’s platforms have even a third of the capabilities they claim.
I’m surprised they’d use the success of a wheeled vehicle in the desert against a disorganized and non-peer enemy as the impetus to develop this thing. That shows a poor analysis to begin with.
You guys are blind or what? The side door is mainly used to load and unload wheels into the turret; nobody said you HAVE to use them. The vehicle has a driver's hatch on the front and three hatchs for the commander, gunner, and loader on the turret top. You basically criticized a design that you invented, and somehow called yourself smart. In the end, it shows your lack of knowledge of military hardware.
Also, Stryker MGS sucks because it is a terrible vehicle, not because an assault gun is obsolete; otherwise, why even make M10 Booker, which is also an assault gun.
@@The_ZeroLine
It's basically a lite "MBT" wheeled version.
PLA has dedicated amphibious "MBT" type ... along with IFV .
@@peekaboopeekaboo1165 Kind of dumb to have dedicated land and amphibious type. You can’t move through the woods and then switch to your amphibious model or drive through swamps and then just switch over to your land version.
@@The_ZeroLine
Not dumb at all.
Amphibious "MBT" are primarily for amphibious-landing mission .
Wheeled "MBT" are primarily for land mission .
I'm having bf4 flashbacks now
How muxh this chinese light tank?
500K USD?
What kind of armor did it have steel?
Only MBTs use exotic materials in their armor
Where is this appropriate??? Maybe in middle and southern africa and possibly in some parts of mid east----otherwise these things are toast against any real armor, real airpower, and organized and equipped infantry....kinda cool but what do you do with it besides initiating coups in small countrys or an airmobile/marine first strike scenario
One case I can think of: if you need to assault trenches and don't have 20k old T-55s laying around, it could be worth buying a fleet of these things.
The purpose of these equipment is to be light enough and have strong firepower. A complete composite brigade with 400 heavy equipment can be deployed by air within 10 hours to any location within a range of 2000 kilometers.
US may not win peace
BUT
we can always "redefine" victory.
white flags can be binary for flag of victory
and
hands above heads can be binary for victory dance.
Western equipment is not designed for "show", that's an unfair assessment. They are expensive and not procured in large numbers, that would be a fair assessment.
They are. Look at the stupid LCS and Dumbwalt cruiser. Lol. Billions wasted.
Same with India
India ordered " 300 OT-64A (version fitted with BRDM-2 turret) ordered from Czechoslovakia in 1969 and delivered between 1971 and 1974."
TATA copied OT-64A and made Indian version which they called Tata Kestrel.
TATA did not copy it. Don't spread fake news!
It was joint development with DRDO called WHaP!
@@BlackHawkTejas
I think copy is the wrong word
I would say that they where inspired by them
Simular to the Chinese type 96 tank
It wasn't a direct copy of the T-72 but you can clearly see how much they share
@@simonwoess5679There is always some one to do propaganda against india usually Pakistanis..
First of all india never purchased any such hardware from czechoslovakia
That too in 70s.india.bearly purchased anything from other than soviets.
Secondly the tata never designed that kestral its state runned drdo who designed it and gave tech transfer to mahindra , tata, and kalyani defence. Which they made there own more advancements in it and also named differently..
Surely it is very capable and modular as well. This guy should stop doing this propaganda use real name.
There is ton of difference in dimensions of tata kestral & oh64
@@Ulatimber
1st
Yes India really bought OT-64 APCs he even got the dates and numbers right
2nd
Copying and taking inspiration from something are two different things
Maybe they just want the Taras take a simular place in the inidian army as the OT-64 therefore the Simular disign
3rd
There is absolutely no shame in taking inspection from other countries militaries
Even the Russians and Americans copied from other
And look at China
they have build what might be the 2nd strongest fighting force on the entire planet and until the mid 2010s they haven't produced a single vehicle or aircraft that's not a complete copy and yet today they have can produce more 5th gen fighters year than Russia wants to pruduce in the next 5
@@simonwoess5679we might have brought but I have searched I found nothing about it anyways. I said the dimension are not similar it's not a copy but drdo's own product. And tata has show different tuurets on it with 105mm gun and 30mm as well it has more powerful engine both weights 23-24tons it had 600ho engine compared to type 8 440hp. It is no less than any other platform that's it. And it will be not as expensive as striker as well.
Aside from the first gulf War, The US has lost every war its poked its nose into since ww2.
Isn't that true with China?
@@theimmortal4718 who mentioned china?typical american deflection...
Yes the mobile gun system's advanced and inovative systems like an auto loader. No one has ever used one of those before.
For those that don't know, the auto loader was one of the many issues with the MGS, and auto loaders are a common feature on non-US vehicles.
Autoloaders are better than humans
@@kingdedede1066 not the point. Also not true of the auto loader on the MGS, but still not the point.
@@randomdude4505 what was the point
@@kingdedede1066 it was a criticism of the anti-american bias displayed in the video. They made a bad argument that doesn't fit with the analogy made because they let their bias get in the way. Which is too bad as this channel is generally rather good.
@@randomdude4505 it’s true that generally soviet style auto loaders are not as good as human loaders but I think he may have been referring to bustle style autoloaders present in a number of western tanks such as K2 and Leclerc which are superior in many ways to human loaders.
a good copy .
Stop this nonsense of design copy in comment section.. 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
Though everybody knows if its chinese.. It has been copied or reverse enginered.. 😅😅😅😅
On lighter note of course.. Spread love not hatred u gays 😊
Indians just made a copy of the type 08 a decade later, and much worse quality.
Your dady must have copied it the dimension doesnt look similar how did india got the its data chinese security is so poor .
I dont understand how india can copy a 8 Metre machine make it 7.8 m .
Its height is 2.1 m but india made it 2.3m . How can this happen, you are so smart to speculate anything,🤓 cant understand basics. China is great at propaganda no doubt about it . Hires Pakistan to do for them and come with real name dude
@@Ulatimber
That must've been some Pakistani troll!
@@matovicmmilan may be 😂.I Always find some one to demean india usa Chinese enemies basically.
And another thing Chinese PPL can't use CZcams but I always find PPL.so much praising china Chinese equipments .
Dude gotta watch serpentza !
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
Turning point, not breaking point.
This "light tank" works in the soft ground of South China and in the steep terrain of Western China. Maybe it's even air droppable. It's far more useful than a 65 ton MBT.
Wild fields in South China is a nightmare for wheeled vehicles, just like paddy fields in Vietnam. The real light tank suitable for southern China is ZTQ15. The only reason ZTL11 (and all 08 variants) works well in the south is because China's extremely well-developed highway network
Ztl 21 zırhlı lastik tekerlekli 8.8 araç üzerine zırhlı 125mm tank topunu zırhlı kulesi entegre ettim 30mm 3namlulu makineli topunu entegre ettim 1000kw lazer topunu entegre ettim insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak
With my ideas for US airpower, the Chinese vehicle will look like a golf cart.
primitive thinking. 😂
@@buravan1512 You what?
Ztl 33 zırhlı lastik tekerlekli 10.10 araç üzerine Orhun A4 A5 125mmtank topu zırhlı kulesini enterge ettim 35mm 6namlulu makinalı topu enterge ettim 1500kw lazer topu enterge ettim insansı robot pilotlar kullanacak
So will ask from what country did China steal this tech to make this?
Thanks for thinking so highly of China's intelligence agencies that can hack and steal everything every time at will and nothing anyone can do about it lol.
Is this a copy of Tata WhAP?
Bcoz it looks like one.. China Copied Indian NAMICA anyways😮💨
Do you think it looks copied? Then India copied because the ZTL-11 is older (~1200 produced, part of the Type 08 family (~6000 produced)), while the Kestrel is newer (2014-) with just a dozen or so produced.
@@volrathsstronghold copy cheats always support copiers.. just look at all the Chinese machinery, doesn't it Show American or Russian weapons being reverse-engineered..
It won't be a surprise if China Copied India.. because China cannot afford to do shit on its own.. it's whole existence is itself a byproduct of reverse-engineering..
Go argue with someone else kid..🤣🤣
Im pretty sure the ZTL-08 'inspired' by the Terrex ICV of Singapore. if memory serves a batch of Terrex IFVs were impounded in hongkong by the Chinese government for serval months after a Singoporian/Taiwanese exercise. the PLA had 4 months to pore over the vehicles before they returned them.
It is a copy. China managed to develop a Time Machine and stole the blueprints for the Tata WhAP and created the ZTL in 2008.
@@paulzheng5327 Tata WhAP was designed in 2006, calculate the timelines and compare with Tejas prototype to LSP induction.. you have your answer duh..
Hier der Pegasus Galaktica 7 Cyborg Darcho Jandreoski i R.MKD PRESIDENT Kiro Gligorov mi gi prefrlia parite vo GALAKTICA SUPERMAN SD CARD - Kriva Palanka slucaj
Lol sorry😂 British storm shadow missiles failed many times in Russia only himars javelin atgms & Turkish byrakatar TB2s & as well as patriot defence systems where very effective & deadly weapons used by Ukrainians 😂which is I think first level of effective weaponry then includes other different types of weapons from different countries. 😂
8:16 - what do you mean - Ukraine did ;) and they performed poorly ;)
9:49 - what do you mean - US *this century* i.e. since 2000 has had almost no victories - there is only a lone victory over Iraq. US has failed time and time again, constantly loosing wars.
Lol..bluds mentioning the Palestinian land as occupied land😂😂
Average westerners...
HIMAR ne menja puno na terenu ni storm takodje obicne gluposti Ruse nije zaustavio Himars i nece ih zaustaviti nista od zapadne tehnologije Imaju jednostavno Rusi bolju tehnologiju i vojsku