Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 - New York - GTX 1080Ti, 2560 x 1440, Ultra, i7 7700K, 64GB RAM
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 08. 2020
- A brief showcase of how well the GTX 1080Ti performs in this sim on Ultra settings at 2560 x 1440. I regard anything close to or above 30FPS under stress as acceptable, as I use G-SYNC.
- Hry
POV: You searched up something along the lines of 64gb ram msfs and this popped up
hit a little too close to home
I searched microsoft sim
POV: you're right
Looked pretty good. Thought yhe frame rate to be fine. Saw one stutter over the park, but before that fps hadn't crossed my mind
This game really loves ram... I really need to add more GB as it's chocking my 16gb ram and eats more than 10gb vram on my 1080ti. Fps dips like crazy in NY and Tokyo.
why are the shadows of the building so dark
How much RAM do you use for flying in NYC?
64GB DDR4 @ 3,000 Mhz.
26 GB of RAM. Probably the only non-creative application in which 64 GB might not feel like an overkill
:D
Quick question: would I get any performance gain from 32GB RAM to 64GB RAM, or 64GB RAM to 128GB RAM?? Thanks!
I'd say it depends on a number of things as the difference and benefits only emerge under certain conditions ... is it easily affordable, do you have other uses for the extra RAM (i.e. Video Editing) and do you like to have a lot of apps open whilst gaming?
Yes you will get less fps drops and less microstutters because there is more models and stuff in the cache so basically your pc will run better because it can remember more things and there will be less of a chance for your cpu to catch up the previous frame lost which causes a stutter
@@JamieCrew its debatable that 32gb wont do that perfectly well for this game, so the questions becomes where do you see the most improvement for your buck? id only reccommend 64gb if you already have a killer pc in all other aspects as youll notice a bigger difference upgrading from an i7 to an i9 or a 3080 to a 3090 then you would going to 64gb
I really doubt you would see any gain. I'd bet heavily against it. Save your money, it's all gpu on these simulators.
Do it at night and watch it tank the FPS even more. I would play at 1080p on high with the 1080ti.
Thanks for the video. It's crazy how this game will only use 21gb of ram if you use 32gb in total. I'm gonna upgrade to 64 for sure!
lol usage doesnt matter, only frames, check the frames difference before sinking money into it, theres a hundred better ways to upgrade a pc before doing that, id only upgrade IF: you have money to kill, you already have a 3090, I9, M.2, and at least 32gb of ram at 4000Mhz, a 4k monitor, and glorious peripherals/controllers.
@@fishandbike if usage didn't matter, it simply wouldn't use more Ram with 64gb would it . . .
@@azzazz4549 im not sure you understand what I said or how it works bud. I said usage doesnt matter, only frames. if you can get more fps with less ram then isnt that the goal? im trying to point out that theres a lot more that goes into it then usage. this guy would be better off upgrading to a 3090 from his 1080 lmao. 32gb of ram would still keep the game stable and he would see a huge jump in performance. same with a CPU upgrade, hes got a 7700k... if i stuck 256gb of ram in a pc with an i3 and a 950 my usage would still be way up there but youd have piss poor performance..... im just saying that the swap from 32-64 isnt worth it unless everything else upgraded first. even ram speed matters more, youd see a bigger difference in gaming going from 2400mhz to 4000mhz then just adding 64gb of ram. theres literally hundreds of youtube videos that support that claim
@@azzazz4549 unless of course gaming isnt your priority
@@fishandbike Microsoft simulator 2020 26+gb, Windows OS 6gb at times + other apps you running in the background
That's already past 32gb Ram
do yo uhave a benchmark comparison between 32GB and 64GB, to see the full benefit of 64GB in detail?
No I don't. My rig has used 64GB for a long time. I have seen a few comparison videos out there on CZcams though, typically comparing 8 to 16 or 16 to 32.
I have 64 gb and can tell you that there is 0 fps difference in gaming, the benefit of 64gb is for workstation PC when you are rendering large animation or files or doing large software editing. gaming stops improving after 32, thats why nobody posts benchmark comparisons of 64GB because its always the same as 32 gb
@@fishandbike However ... I could not get FS2020 to utilise 26GB to 27GB of RAM on a 32GB rig, as I wouldn't have enough RAM remaining for the OS and anything else I might want to run, such as Discord etc. Thus, having 64GB has allowed FS2020 to completely max out RAM utilisation according to how fast my sweating CPU can shovel that data. I wish I could find a way to see which process was tied to the RAM though, as it may be reporting a total rather than a Directx related consumption. I just don't know.
@@PaulTinsley I disagree, take 32GB out and tell me if you notice a difference, what ram speed are you running if I might ask?
utilizing slightly more ram doesnt necessarily translate to more fps, especially with a 7th gen cpu and 10 series gpu. even FS2020's website says the high end recommendation is 32GB. Nah... I use 64 for FEMAP with NX Nastran lol not for gaming
64GB RAM can run 10+ virtual machine with 8GB ram
why 64GB....
I used to also use that rig for experimental software engineering.
@@PaulTinsley fair enough, i mean I got 64 gb in mine i just use it for videoediting and 3d animation sometimes which is fun
I am thinking of 64 GB for my next rig, to be "future proof" and to also possibly handle lots of Addons and DLCs in the future, possibly beginning of next year, when those new RTX 3000something beasts are available.
@@pfr2544 Certainly worth having loads of RAM if budget permits ... it's made my rig sing like an angel.
@@pfr2544 dont, I have it its not for gaming and wont be for 5+ years. 32 GB is future proofing more than enough, by the time you want 64GB for gaming you will want ddr5 ram which isnt out yet