क्या Nehru ने Constitution में पहला संशोधन करके लोगों की आज़ादी छीनी थी? | Aasan Bhasha Mein
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 07. 2024
- In this video, The Lallantop’s Abhishek Tripathi explains about the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951. He describes the following -
What were the reasons which led to this constitutional amendment?
What were the major changes in the Constitution because of this amendment?
What did historian Tripurdaman Singh write in his book “Sixteen Stormy Days” about the fierce debate in the parliament on this topic?
खबरों को विस्तार से पढ़ने के लिए क्लिक करे यहां- www.thelallantop.com/
Instagram: / thelallantop
Facebook: / thelallantop
Twitter: / thelallantop
Produced By: The Lallantop
Edited By: Mukesh
मूर्तिभंजकों की सबसे बड़ी लाभार्थी कांग्रेस है ,कांग्रेस ने मूर्तिभंजकों की कृपा से देश पर 70 तक हुकूमत की है 🙄🙄🙄🤔🤔🤔
पंडित नेहरू किसी पार्टी की निजी संपत्ति नहीं हैं।
चमचे: हमे ये अनुच्छेद और इमर्जेंसी 1975 समझ नहीं आती पर,संविधान जरूर खतरे मे है।😂
@@narendrasinghrana7534 Rana matlab mugalput 🤣
सविधान को हज़ार बार बदलने वाले आज हाथ मे सविधान लेकर खड़े है।।😅😅
😂
भारतीय संविधान लेकर खड़े हैं तकलीफ किस बातकी है? संविधान बदलने और किसी एक नियम में आंशिक संशोधन में फर्क़ हैं लोग समझते इसलिए यूपी में पेले गए हो
@@vikas9437 प्यारे अंडनामाजी संविधान संशोधन करना बदलना ही होता है 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😊
जब पंचशील समझौता (1954) हुआ तो पंडित जी ने तिब्बत को चीन का भाग करार दे दिया था। पंडित नेहरू जी की महान गलतियों में यह एक है। सन् 1962 में जब चीन ने भारत पर आक्रमण किया तो चीनी सेना इसी रास्ते से आक्रमण करने के लिए आई थी और हम हिंदी चीनी भाई-भाई के नारे लगा रहे थे। हम जानते हैं कि चीन युद्ध (1962) में भारत हार गया था। इस हार के कारणों को जानने के लिए लै. जनरल हैडरसन और कमांडर ब्रिगेडियर भारत सरकार की अगुवाई में एक समिति का गठन किया गया था जिसमें भारत के तत्कालीन प्रधानमंत्री पंडित नेहरू जी को जिम्मेदार ठहराया गया था। आज भी चीन ने भारत की 14000 वर्ग किलोमीटर भूमि पर अपना कब्जा किया हुआ है
@@Bharat_kumar8ye chamcha hai islo samvidhan ka anuched ka gyan nhi hoga ye sab anpadh hai 😂
आजादी के बाद देश को आईआईटी आईआईएम एम्स जैसे संस्थानों को देने वाला अगर आपको पसंद नही तो ये आपकी problem है हमारी नही।😊
Aur 70 saalo mei sirf ek wahi dia at least under Modi we got the most AIIMS and MIT.
Do you think they have done any favour by doing so 😡
@@introvert_2023 bro modi ke pass AIIMS and MIT banane ke liye paise asmaan se aye? how did adani and ambani became rich, how did people became rich before india? kabhi yeh pucha aapne? Because of hard works done by congress and Jawahar Lal Nehru and all other prime ministers. Why modi never gave a press conference? FIRST PRIME MINISTER WHO NEVER DONE A PRESS CONFERENCE AND MAKE MOCKERY OF THE CONSTITUATION BY SAYING INFLITRATORS AND JYADA BACHE PAIDA KARNE WALE TO A MINORITY.
@@parmeetplayinggamesnehru konsa paise Ghar se leke aaya tha
Paisa to usne bhi Desh ka hi lagaya tha
@@parmeetplayinggameswah beta wah ye sahi hai apne mu miya mitthu ban jao, ab ye bata agar Nehru aur indira nai itna kiya to desh ko kotora le ke bheek maange ki nau at kyo aai, economic reforms kyo karne pade, aur jab Nehru ko pata tha administrative machinery corrupt hai British ki establish ki hui to usne reform kyo nahi kiye? Aur ye bhi pata kar le aims kisnai diya. Aur Nehru se bada chor koi nahi ekvote nahi mila par jabardasti baith gaya satta mai.
दुनिया के सारे देश present और future के बारे में सोच रहा है हमारे देश के सासंद में लोग जनता के वर्तमान के भविष्य के बारे में सोचने के बदले past में हुए गलतियों को गिनाने में व्यस्थ है।
जो हुआ सो हुआ आगे नही होना चाहिए ऐसा संकल्प लेके आगे बढ़े।
Har present me past ki chhap hoti hai.jo ise bhul jaye vo future nhi bana sakta . isiliye hame har chiz yaad rakhni chahiye chahe past ho ya future.aapki soch se chale to bachho ko itihas hi nhi padhni chahiye.aur har desh me past ki galtiyon ko yaad kiya jata hai.aap koi aisa desh bata de jo aisa nhi karta khas kar jaha loktantr hai.😊
@@srishtigupta5927 bhai Mai itihas khattam karne ki bat nahi kar raha hu past ke debate le liye historian hai or wo hote rahenge lekin abhi asal mudde ko chhor ke ye log ek dusre ke purvaj ki galti dhundh rahe hai
संविधान को बदलने वाला आज संविधान को हाथ में लेकर खड़ा है ये लोकतंत्र की ताकत है ❤❤
Shi to hai @@hajartansari6662
@@hajartansari6662Andhbhakt tu 😂 oath ke time andhbhakt ke papa ko samajh aa gaya hoga ki power of constitution kya hai 😂 bahumat se gathbandhan ki sarkar Tak ka saphar😂
Didi kya badla Gaya tha kuchh batao ge
@@hajartansari6662tu v chatukar bhakt hi h
But I notice that each gupta's not andhbhakt some also have logic 😊
इसका मतलब वोटबैंक पॉलिटिक्स देश के आजादी के बाद से शुरू हो गई थी। आरक्षण दो और वोट हासिल करो।
No, at 8:55, you was wrong. Article 16(4) was present in original Constitution, only article 15(4) was inserted through first amendment.
SC/ST reservation act 1951 me banaya gaya iska matlab ye Ambedkar ne banaya hi nahi tha😮😮
Mahanubhav vo article 16 se hi derive hua h
Isliye pad le. You tube me hagne se pehle 😂
@@Tom-ll2cr 😂
Secular n socialism hata diya jaye jo emergency pe lagaya gya tha
Ambedkar ka zamane ka asli constitution laya jaye ramji ke tasvir wala
Democracy 💪💪❤️
Ends in West bangal😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Shubhkumar444pure desh me barbaad hua pada hai 😢
Ukhad fenko sarkar ko aur party mat chuno vidhayak, sansad chuno jo kam kre ya karta ho, nafrate na felata ho RSS ki sarkar hindu Muslim karke sattta hasil karti h@@preet072
This video was problematic. This is why I think so:
This was a disappointing video. The information provided was inadequate and one-sided. Mr Tripurdaman Singh fails to provide the background in which the amendment was made. At that time, communalism was at its peak. The Father of the Nation had been assassinated and illiteracy and superstitions were through the roof. To make matters worse, communists had announced a violent revolution against India. All these forces were disseminating hateful and divisive ideas all over India. People like Pandit Nehru, Rajaji, and Dr Ambedkar realised that something had to be done to protect the unity of India and the well-being of Indians. Mr Singh makes it seem like nobody could oppose Pandit Nehru. Is that really the case? Did Rajaji and Dr Ambedkar not oppose him? But when they did, did they mention the amendment brought to free speech?
How problematic situation was prior to the amendment can be understood from the fact that a judge had given a judgement that said that preaching murder and inciting violence were allowed as they came under freedom of speech. Those who are interested can read more about this here:
'Freedom of expression was once wide-ranging in India. Then Jawaharlal Nehru asked for changes'
-Scroll
This was not expected from Lallantop. Mr Singh's works clearly carry an unjustifiable anti-Nehru undercurrent. His book on him was also somewhat shallow and displayed a lack of engagement with his ideas and the context in which he was working. Please don't look at only one side of the story.
Edit: Just how partial Mr Singh's views can be grasped from the fact that he did not highlight the following words of Sardar Patel:
“I find no legal powers to deal with either Press or men like Syama Prasad Mookerjee. Before you left for Indonesia, I drew your attention to the Supreme Court decision in [the] Cross Roads and Organiser cases. That knocks the bottom out of most of our penal laws for the control and regulation of the Press. The views which they have expressed in that judgment on the question of sedition make it doubtful whether we can do anything not only about the speeches of Syama Prasad Mookerjee but also those of the more extremist type. As you say, we have involved ourselves in so many legal and constitutional difficulties that we do not know how to overcome them. I sounded a note of warning and caution when these provisions were being debated in the Drafting Committee, but then we were led away by our idealistic exuberance. We seldom paused to consider the practical and administrative applications of the many constitutional provisions and even their interrelation. My own feeling is that very soon we shall have to sit down and consider constitutional amendments.”
They are present in the Scroll article. Again, why did the Lallantop team not look into this? There's already so much misinformation about our founders. If those who have significant influence and don't believe in the politics of hate will not do what they need to, then how will we have any hope of defending the truth?
Tell this also that which government did all the amendments.
...arre baba...Lallantop hai re....kaahe bolega😂😂😂
Constitutional Amendments by PM
Modi - 6
Manmohan - 10
Nehru - 13
Indira - 26
Esa bolega to andhbhakt bol denge pata hey ki nhi 😂
@@tejishtosh1491 Bolne ka tax nahin lagta ....agar lagta to Lalu aur Lalu ka zaahil launda jo muh mei supaari daba k bakata rahata hai kangaal ho jaate.....🤣🤣🤣🤣
This is why I found this video to be flawed:
This was a disappointing video. The information provided was inadequate and one-sided. Mr Tripurdaman Singh fails to provide the background in which the amendment was made. At that time, communalism was at its peak. The Father of the Nation had been assassinated and illiteracy and superstitions were through the roof. To make matters worse, communists had announced a violent revolution against India. All these forces were disseminating hateful and divisive ideas all over India. People like Pandit Nehru, Rajaji, and Dr Ambedkar realised that something had to be done to protect the unity of India and the well-being of Indians. Mr Singh makes it seem like nobody could oppose Pandit Nehru. Is that really the case? Did Rajaji and Dr Ambedkar not oppose him? But when they did, did they mention the amendment brought to free speech?
How problematic situation was prior to the amendment can be understood from the fact that a judge had given a judgement that said that preaching murder and inciting violence were allowed as they came under freedom of speech. Those who are interested can read more about this here:
'Freedom of expression was once wide-ranging in India. Then Jawaharlal Nehru asked for changes'
-Scroll
This was not expected from Lallantop. Mr Singh's works clearly carry an unjustifiable anti-Nehru undercurrent. His book on him was also somewhat shallow and displayed a lack of engagement with his ideas and the context in which he was working. Please don't look at only one side of the story.
Edit: Just how partial Mr Singh's views can be grasped from the fact that he did not highlight the following words of Sardar Patel:
“I find no legal powers to deal with either Press or men like Syama Prasad Mookerjee. Before you left for Indonesia, I drew your attention to the Supreme Court decision in [the] Cross Roads and Organiser cases. That knocks the bottom out of most of our penal laws for the control and regulation of the Press. The views which they have expressed in that judgment on the question of sedition make it doubtful whether we can do anything not only about the speeches of Syama Prasad Mookerjee but also those of the more extremist type. As you say, we have involved ourselves in so many legal and constitutional difficulties that we do not know how to overcome them. I sounded a note of warning and caution when these provisions were being debated in the Drafting Committee, but then we were led away by our idealistic exuberance. We seldom paused to consider the practical and administrative applications of the many constitutional provisions and even their interrelation. My own feeling is that very soon we shall have to sit down and consider constitutional amendments.”
They are present in the Scroll article. Again, why did the Lallantop team not look into this? There's already so much misinformation about our founders. If those who have significant influence and don't believe in the politics of hate will not do what they need to, then how will we have any hope of defending the truth?
Nehru ne Kerala mein chuni hui sarkaar giraake president ka rule lagaya
Nehru ne majru sultanpuri ko 2 saal jail mein rakha sirf usko hitler bolne par.
So don't try to defend him. Nehru se kai guna ache PV narsimha rao the
@@drweb0 kya Nehru se Modi Ji Acha hai
@@tayutaku7797 han
Nehru jaisa neta, jo jabardasti PM bna sirf gandhi ki zid pe (desh aur Congress ne to bose aur fir patel ko chuna tha), jisne kashmir mein lutiya dubai, china se haar gya, secularism ke naam pe appeasement kiya
Usse to acha hi hai modi
@@drweb0 Arey Bhai, Nehru Ji jab PM chuna gaya tabh tak Patel Ji ki nidan ho chuke the aur Subhash Ji ko under hona pratha kyuki Subhash Ji Desh ko Azad krayi lekin Hinsak ke rah peh chle teh, Abh Bacha Nehru Ji, PM na banteh toh kisse bna tha. Nehru Ji na hota toh aaj Modi Ji ko Bechne ke liye kuch hota, Arunachal Pradesh ke Kuch hisse aur Ladakh ke Kuch hisse China Occupied kar li, pta nahi Modi Ji ke Laal laal Ankh kaha gaya aur chappan inch ke Sine bhi Sikhur gaya kya.
@@tayutaku7797 bhai please read history
Congress ka leader chunne ke liye voting hui thi 1938 mein jisme bose jeete the but unko banne ni diya congress president gandhi ne, uske baad unhone congress chodi thi
Aur jis voting mein nehru ko president chuna tha vo 1946 mein hui thi. Jeete patel the lekin nehru ko gandhi ne support kiya
Pta ni konsi whatsapp university se history padhte ho bhai.
Patel ji ki death 1950 mein hui thi
PM nehru 1947 mein bna
@@drweb0 1947 mein toh Desh Azad hui thi, Nehru Ji Azad Bharat ke PM 1951 mein bna tha. Subhash Ji ne Aapne Dam peh Hindustan Ki Azadi 1947 se bohut pehle ghoshit kar chuke teh.
जब भाजपा और संघ कहती है कि वह संविधान बदल देगी, उसका मतलब पूरे देश को पता होता है 😊
हर मूर्तिभंजक डायरेक्ट इंडायरेक्ट कांग्रेस को ही वोट करता है 🙄🙄🙄
नेहरू जी इतने महान थे तो फिर यह देश इतना पीछे क्यों स्थितियाँ तो वैसी की वैसी है
Democracy ❤❤
आज पता चला आरक्षण अंबेडकर जी ने नही दिया था
Excellently presented. Very easy to understand. Thanks to reporter and whole team of lallantop
But the presentation was incomplete. I wrote this comment earlier concerning this:
This was a disappointing video. The information provided was inadequate and one-sided. Mr Tripurdaman Singh fails to provide the background in which the amendment was made. At that time, communalism was at its peak. The Father of the Nation had been assassinated and illiteracy and superstitions were through the roof. To make matters worse, communists had announced a violent revolution against India. All these forces were disseminating hateful and divisive ideas all over India. People like Pandit Nehru, Rajaji, and Dr Ambedkar realised that something had to be done to protect the unity of India and the well-being of Indians. Mr Singh makes it seem like nobody could oppose Pandit Nehru. Is that really the case? Did Rajaji and Dr Ambedkar not oppose him? But when they did, did they mention the amendment brought to free speech?
How problematic situation was prior to the amendment can be understood from the fact that a judge had given a judgement that said that preaching murder and inciting violence were allowed as they came under freedom of speech. Those who are interested can read more about this here:
'Freedom of expression was once wide-ranging in India. Then Jawaharlal Nehru asked for changes'
-Scroll
This was not expected from Lallantop. Mr Singh's works clearly carry an unjustifiable anti-Nehru undercurrent. His book on him was also somewhat shallow and displayed a lack of engagement with his ideas and the context in which he was working. Please don't look at only one side of the story.
Edit: Just how partial Mr Singh's views can be grasped from the fact that he did not highlight the following words of Sardar Patel:
“I find no legal powers to deal with either Press or men like Syama Prasad Mookerjee. Before you left for Indonesia, I drew your attention to the Supreme Court decision in [the] Cross Roads and Organiser cases. That knocks the bottom out of most of our penal laws for the control and regulation of the Press. The views which they have expressed in that judgment on the question of sedition make it doubtful whether we can do anything not only about the speeches of Syama Prasad Mookerjee but also those of the more extremist type. As you say, we have involved ourselves in so many legal and constitutional difficulties that we do not know how to overcome them. I sounded a note of warning and caution when these provisions were being debated in the Drafting Committee, but then we were led away by our idealistic exuberance. We seldom paused to consider the practical and administrative applications of the many constitutional provisions and even their interrelation. My own feeling is that very soon we shall have to sit down and consider constitutional amendments.”
They are present in the Scroll article. Again, why did the Lallantop team not look into this? There's already so much misinformation about our founders. If those who have significant influence and don't believe in the politics of hate will not do what they need to, then how will we have any hope of defending the truth?
After a very long time, some sensible story by Lallantop
I don't think that it was. Here's a comment I left earlier:
This was a disappointing video. The information provided was inadequate and one-sided. Mr Tripurdaman Singh fails to provide the background in which the amendment was made. At that time, communalism was at its peak. The Father of the Nation had been assassinated and illiteracy and superstitions were through the roof. To make matters worse, communists had announced a violent revolution against India. All these forces were disseminating hateful and divisive ideas all over India. People like Pandit Nehru, Rajaji, and Dr Ambedkar realised that something had to be done to protect the unity of India and the well-being of Indians. Mr Singh makes it seem like nobody could oppose Pandit Nehru. Is that really the case? Did Rajaji and Dr Ambedkar not oppose him? But when they did, did they mention the amendment brought to free speech?
How problematic situation was prior to the amendment can be understood from the fact that a judge had given a judgement that said that preaching murder and inciting violence were allowed as they came under freedom of speech. Those who are interested can read more about this here:
'Freedom of expression was once wide-ranging in India. Then Jawaharlal Nehru asked for changes'
-Scroll
This was not expected from Lallantop. Mr Singh's works clearly carry an unjustifiable anti-Nehru undercurrent. His book on him was also somewhat shallow and displayed a lack of engagement with his ideas and the context in which he was working. Please don't look at only one side of the story.
Edit: Just how partial Mr Singh's views can be grasped from the fact that he did not highlight the following words of Sardar Patel:
“I find no legal powers to deal with either Press or men like Syama Prasad Mookerjee. Before you left for Indonesia, I drew your attention to the Supreme Court decision in [the] Cross Roads and Organiser cases. That knocks the bottom out of most of our penal laws for the control and regulation of the Press. The views which they have expressed in that judgment on the question of sedition make it doubtful whether we can do anything not only about the speeches of Syama Prasad Mookerjee but also those of the more extremist type. As you say, we have involved ourselves in so many legal and constitutional difficulties that we do not know how to overcome them. I sounded a note of warning and caution when these provisions were being debated in the Drafting Committee, but then we were led away by our idealistic exuberance. We seldom paused to consider the practical and administrative applications of the many constitutional provisions and even their interrelation. My own feeling is that very soon we shall have to sit down and consider constitutional amendments.”
They are present in the Scroll article. Again, why did the Lallantop team not look into this? There's already so much misinformation about our founders. If those who have significant influence and don't believe in the politics of hate will not do what they need to, then how will we have any hope of defending the truth?
Religion bhi ek prakar ki vichardhara hai usi prakar atheistism bhi ek prakar ki vichardhara hi hai .aur koi vichardhara perfect nhi hoti.har vichardhara ki ek Seema hoti hai.aur har vichardhara ka mul siddhant parivartan aur logo ke jivan me sudhar lana hota hai.lekin jab ye apni Seema ko tad deti hai ise hi keval shreshth bata diya jata hai anya ke mukabale to ye hinsa ka rup le leti hai. jo na Jane kitno ki jindagi ko khatam kar deti hai.aur ye China aur Russia me dekh sakte hai jo communist ke naam pe lakho carore ki jaan le li aur USA jo loktantra ko perfect batakar vietnam, iraq me lakho carore ko maar diya.isiliye har vichardhara ke khilaf ek dusri vichardhara panapti rahti hai .😊kisi bhi chij ko bhagwan mat banao kyuki ise banane wala bhi insaan hi hai.aur kamiya isme bhi ho sakti hai.
Ye book likhne wale ke vyaktigat vichar hain, aaj desh nehru aur anya netaon ki banai seedhiyon par hi yaha pahucha h...
पंडित नेहरू के दूरदर्शी नेता आज के नेताओं के पुल 10 दिन में गिर जाते हैं उनके द्वारा बनाए गए बांध आज भी लोगों को बिजली और सुरक्षा दे रहे हैं।
सही बात है...
Doordarshi😂😂😂
Watch any video containing big blunders by lehru chacha
उनकी दूरदाशिता के कारण ही आज हम कश्मीर को ३ भागो में विभाजित होते हुए देख पाएं है
@@prateeksharma3847 Hindi chini Bhai Bhai dedo china ko veto power. china border par road bna rha h kuch mat karo.
Tibbet ko china ka hissa man lo.
Kashmir ka issue UN me le jao.
...,.................lehru chacha
@@prateeksharma3847 भाई तुने संविधान का "उद्देश प्रस्ताव" कभी पढा है क्या??? पहले वो समझना फिर ओछी बात करना....
Bhai ka naam abhisek tripathi hai mtlb panchayat ka sachiv ji
जय हिन्द जय भारत माता कि सुन्दर वर्णन सत्य उल्लेख है
नेहरू परिवार की वजह से भारत बरबाद हो गया जो आज तक जारी है अगर नियम लागू होता तो सरदार पटेल प्रधानमंत्री होते पाकिस्तान के नाम पर जो मुसीबत निकालनी थी वो मुसीबत दुबारा आज भारत मे ना होती
What's app university se roz gyan le rahe ho bhar bhar kr😂
Jay hind
Clear and lucid.
जिसके दादा ने संविधान को बदला जिसकी दादी ने आपातकालीन लगाया वो लोग आज संविधान को हाथ में लेकर घूम रहे हैं
Andhbhakt
राहुल गांधी ब्रह्मण हैं वो हमेशा बहरुपिया षडयंत्रकारी कपटी होता है जन्मजात रूप से
@@fitcomedyvines2862
तेरे जैसे चमचो ने संविधान कभी पढा नही
पर संविधान खतरे मे है।😂
Dekho aa gya chamsa 😂😂
Still discussing Nehru……….amount of respect for u guys is decreasing day by day without any question….BIK GYI H LALLANTOP GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!!!!
ललनटॉप बचाने की कोशिश क्यूँ कर रहे हे... सबको मालूम है...... केसे सब कंट्रोल किया गया
Jakar study kar...
What's app university k student 😂😂😂
Dallantop k naye naye dalle, khud pdhle pehle @@Naveen_Dahiya2004
क्या नहेरु खानदान ही देश को चला🚶👣👣 सकते हैं ओर कोई नहीं ??????
Please study the members of Constitution committee.
They all life force of this constitution.
Many of them are truthful persons.
विभाजन के उस दौर में हिंदू मुस्लिम को साथ लेकर भारत का विकास करने वाले पंडित नेहरू जी को देश हमेशा याद रखेगा।
लेकिन बाबा साहेब ने तो कहा था जब तक एक एक मुस्लिम पाकिस्तान नही चला जाएगा पूर्ण संविधान नही माना जाएगा :- partition of India अब कमेंट डिलीट मत करना यार 😂😂
😂🔔🔔
Halfचड्डी के लोग ज्ञान बांट रहे है... 😅😅
चड्डी गैग के लोग ज्ञान बांट रहे 😅😅
@@Bharat_kumar8 abe andkosh bhakt ye tune kha padh liya
I am not against reservation,but my question is,How children of doctor, engineer,officer, teacher get's reservation??,I don't get this nonsense.
Likhna sikh pehle madrasachap 😂
pandit ji amar rhen
lag gaya dallantop aur jnu patarkaar saurabh dwivedi ki team congress ki traf se sfaai dene. Lekin nupur sharma ke maamle par ab tak hadeed nahi padha gaya dallantop team ke dwara. anand rangnathan ji ne sahi kaha tha 4 nimbu nichodne se dudh itna nahi fat ta jitni dallantop ki fati hui hai.
Lallantop gira hua to hai pata tha magar itna gira hua hai pata nahi tha lanat hai satta paksha ke bare me bol ke dekho😡
It should be compulsory for MP's to study the Constitution and watch the previous proceedings of the Parliament both audiovisually and textually and test their proficiency and deny them a second term if they fail absymally . It has nothing to do with academic learning, just in case, due to lack of opportunity, poverty or any other handicap they have not gone to institutions of learning. It will result in better debates and improved laws.
In those days Mukarji was not
Associated with R.S.S.
DWARKA PRASAD JOSHI Nagpur
The first amendment in May 1951 was a dirty act of mutilating fundamental rights by bothAmbedkar and Nehru. Ambedkar is said to have initiated it to nullify the verdict of Supreme Court regarding admission to professional courses. A Tamil Brahmin girl student was denied admission in medical college by arbitrarily applying the reservation in public jobs to reservation in admission too in professional colleges. Supreme court had ruled that the constitutional provision did not apply to admissions. Ambedkar wanted to nullify the Supreme court order and Nehru agreed for an amendment by including two more clauses in this amendment as per his whims to curb freedom of speech and Right to property.
Needless to say , reservation in admission was a big jolt to talent and led to social disharmony in a big way by killing the career of the youth of General category as well as causing big harm to quality of Govt colleges . No wonder the quality of Universities and Institutes created by the British went on declining in quality after 1951. A big sin of Ambedkar.Curb on freedom of speech ir expression was another big sin of Nehru.
Judicial custody nahi judicial review ( न्यायिक पुनरावलोकन)
No, Nehru did not take away people's freedom by making the first amendment to the Indian Constitution, as it was intended to benefit the people. However, the actual outcome differed from the promised benefits, and the government failed to fulfill its commitments, much like in politics where promises are often not kept. Therefore, in essence, the amendment did restrict people's freedom, as the government's actions did not align with their words ! 🙏
Amendment 42 kya tha
Ab chamache log khamosh 😂😂
Please correct yourself, there are total 106 constitutional amendments has been made so far,,
2nd In the judgment of keswa* SC recognized judicial review(not custody) as a basic structure.
👍👌
Kya Nupur sharma ne Mohammad ke bare me kuch jhoot bola tha?
🤔
अब समय आ गया है कि आज़ तक संविधान में किए गए सारे 127 संशोधनों को रद्द कर मूल संविधान को लागू करना । संविधान लाओ देश बचाओ।
मुद्दा है संविधान को बनाने ओर उसे लागू करने का। मुद्दा है" मनुस्मृति और संविधान "/ रिपोर्टर ने एक तरफा बात की। जरा उस दौर को सोच कर देखिए। और लोगों को मनुस्मृति भी पढ़ना चाहिए कौन इसके समर्थक थे। और आज भी है। संविधान ही भारत का आधुनिक भविष्य है।। संविधान ही इंसान को इंसान मानता है। । जय संबिधान।
Religion bhi ek prakar ki vichardhara hai usi prakar atheistism bhi ek prakar ki vichardhara hi hai .aur koi vichardhara perfect nhi hoti.har vichardhara ki ek Seema hoti hai.aur har vichardhara ka mul siddhant parivartan aur logo ke jivan me sudhar lana hota hai.lekin jab ye apni Seema ko tad deti hai ise hi keval shreshth bata diya jata hai anya ke mukabale to ye hinsa ka rup le leti hai. jo na Jane kitno ki jindagi ko khatam kar deti hai.aur ye China aur Russia me dekh sakte hai jo communist ke naam pe lakho carore ki jaan le li aur USA jo loktantra ko perfect batakar vietnam, iraq me lakho carore ko maar diya.isiliye har vichardhara ke khilaf ek dusri vichardhara panapti rahti hai .😊kisi bhi chij ko bhagwan mat banao chahe vo samvidhan hi kyu na ho.
❤️🙏💯
जय संविधान संविधान ही लोकतंत्र का सच्चा रक्षक है
इसका मतलब है संविधान का रिजर्वेसन का कानून संविधान के समान सुविधाएँ के कानून के खिलाफ है , जिसकी वजह से पढे लिखे लोगों को नौकरिया नहीं मिल रही है |
Physical disability n intellingence me differnece hai.....handicapped ko dena samjh me aata magar caste wise dena ni sahi.
Trust bna k jo log apni jameen bachaye. Majid ko daan deke jo. Apni jameen bachaye
।।जयश्रीगणेश।।जयश्रीकृष्णा।जयश्रीराम।।
1. The constitution of India is made by the Congress Govt against the main object
of partition of India in 1947, that all Muslims shall live in Pakistan and all Hindu, in India, because the both
communities can never live together peacefully due to diversity in their Culture, Tradition, Language, Religion and Ideology.
2. There had never been any concept ot SECULARISM during the period of partition and for the purpose of partition.
The congress Govt. in 1976 secretary added the word - SECULARISM - for India. Which is treacherous with the Non Muslims.
Congress govt. made the constitution of India as a CONGRESS FRIENDLY, and not as per the main object of partition.
3. Muslim leaders got Islamic Pakistan in 1947, while the Hindu leaders got nothing.
4. The congress has made numerous amendments to the constitution of India, so the constitution of India is not
in its original form and has lost the sanctity.
5. Congress divided the Hindu into SIKHS and JAINS. The congress further divided the HIndu into DALITS...SC/ST
BACKWARD and ADIVASI....
6. Congress declared the 30% Muslim second largest population of India as THE MINORITY on the basis of the religion,
against main spirits of the constitution having no regard on the basis of religion and castes. Even if the Muslim
population would cross over 70%, still the Muslims shall be categorized as in MINORITY as per the Unfair constitution.
There is no need to save the present constitution of India........as the present constitution of India is sufficient for
second partition of India or total conversion of India into a Muslim populated Islamic country - ISLAMIC INDIA on increasing
Muslim populations and Muslim vote banks form 06% in 1947 to 30% this time and more than 50% by 2047+ 20% SEcular
Hindu voters= ISLAMIC INDIA either through democracy or through referendum of through civil war. If India is to be saved from another partition, INDIA MUST MAINTAIN AND RESTRICT THE POPULATION AS PER THE DEMOCRACY IN 1947 say:
92% Hindu, 06% Muslims and 02% others. No other way out...
Kahan se copy paste Kiya hai bhai
Isne lagta hai gaanjaa fuka hai
Let me tell you the truth at that time of partition RSS vaalo matlab brahman chalo muslimo ko pakistan mil gaya ab kuch muslimo ne usko thukraya hum yaha he paida huve aur yehi is watan ki mitti mai marenge jab partition ho gaya ab brahmann sc st dalito ko kido makodo ki tarah treat karne lage aur fir kitne backward log Islam kubul karne lage kyuki brahmann unko kachraa samajte the aur aaj bhi samajte hai tabhi ye sab kaanoon laagu huva Gandhi aur nehru ki bhi fati thi us time ki dheere dheere saare Islam kubul kar lenge kyuki Islam mai sab barabar hai na koi jaati lower upper ya backward
Religion world ke liye abhisaap h
130 million killed under atheist government during cold war 😂
@@azibghadi moremore more than 130 million people get killed in religion many war happend because of religion
Religion bhi ek prakar ki vichardhara hai usi prakar atheistism bhi ek prakar ki vichardhara hi hai .aur koi vichardhara perfect nhi hoti.har vichardhara ki ek Seema hoti hai.aur har vichardhara ka mul siddhant parivartan aur logo ke jivan me sudhar lana hota hai.lekin jab ye apni Seema ko tad deti hai ise hi keval shreshth bata diya jata hai anya ke mukabale to ye hinsa ka rup le leti hai. jo na Jane kitno ki jindagi ko khatam kar deti hai.aur ye China aur Russia me dekh sakte hai jo communist ke naam pe lakho carore ki jaan le li aur USA jo loktantra ko perfect batakar vietnam, iraq me lakho carore ko maar diya.isiliye har vichardhara ke khilaf ek dusri vichardhara panapti rahti hai .😊
@@srishtigupta5927 finland denmark europe me yha maximum athiest h bhagwan h to kooi proof kyo nhi kr rha hai to mujhme chip lga k bheje mai aisi question hi na kruuu
@@srishtigupta5927 hamare india ke log moolnivashi dravidian the sc st log aryans bahr se aye bhrahman unhone apne acc dharm granth banayaa apne app ko supremee batayaa rule kiya jo ajj chltaa a rhaa india inhi k wajah se is chua chut caste se jhujhte a rhaa h ajj bhi aj dekho kaya app kisi bhrahman me shadi kr skti ya kisi bhi caste me nhi bataa hu h unhonee aise sikh me nhi hota h na kisi aur dhrm me
Are Bhai Joginder nath mandal ke Pakistan mein sanvidhan ke sath kya hua tha vah bhi baat kar lo
Yeh sabi sata ke buke hai jo ek dusare per ilzaam lagte hai
👍
Wonderful explanation ❤ Nehru ji is visionary person
Nehru ji was that visionary for whom the nation is still suffering.
Visionary 🤡for Chinese
@@debasismisra2485 how come you say that, please elaborate other wise kept quite, don't be a part of andbhakt
@@introvert_2023 MAC MOHAN, the line of actual control ( LoC ), was maintained till Congress ruled India but chinese start encroaching our territories the day Modi Ji start ruling india , can you tell me where is the RED eyes of Modi Ji and where is the chest of Modi Ji measuring fifty six inch.
Love you dear friend want to talk you dear friend
Jab maine nahru ki paanch galatiyan likhi to dallantop mera comment delete kar doya 😂😂😂😂😂😂
100 से ज्यादा बार नेहरू / गाँधी खानदान नें बदला वो आज संबिधान पर खतरा बता रहे हैं " और बाबा साहेब के नीले ककरोच उनका साथ दे रहे हैं ✌️😂😂😂
Jay bhim, Jay nile kabutar
Narngi santre gobar khana nahi chodenge
Bhai hindu drama khatre me hai 🤣 please save 😊 this is moral duty of andhbhakt 😊
A chaplusi ko kyo samjate ho vo smjne vale nhi he agr hote to reservetion kyo jruri he inke liye😂😂
नेहरू को हर बुराई का जिम्मेदार बताने की मुहिम में लल्लनटॉप पीछे क्यों रहे।
Har burari nahi bahat sare 😂....
To ab koi sach v na bole?
It's very painful for spoons to hear the truth 😮😂😂😂😂. History can not be changed 🙏. I don't know how people can bear that arrogant tanashah and self-centred person called Rahul Gandhi 🙄😳🤪
@@sunitlarutrue words..
Sachhayi batana burayi ya achhayi nahi hoti hai. Aur ye to leftist chaneel hai re baba.
Word Indian constitution hai
Aaj wahi jamindaro ke vansaj ki sarkar hai or we pandit nehru ne jo unke purkho ke gardan pakdkar gareebo ko adhikar diye unko tanasah kah rahe hai.
Us hisab se to aaj ke ameer bhi kahenge ki hamare sath tanasahi ho rahi hai kyoki gareeb par income tax nahi lagaya ja raha hai or humse tax wasoola ja raha .
बदलाव अच्छे थे ।
इसलिए केहते हैं काम करो। कोंग्रेस ने भी इतने सालों में कुछ खास नहीं किया। बीजेपी भी जुमले, हिंदू मुस्लिम, दंगो के अलावा कुछ नहीं कर रही है। 🙏
Ankhe khol kar dekhoge to kaam dikh jaega
1 more than 50 crore new bank account
2 toilet revolution
3 swachcha bharat abhiyan
4 digital revolution upi
5 road network
6 iit,iim,aims
........,..
@@yksingh32592 crore ka rojgar bhai rah hi gya hai 😂
@@Creativehuman07 jo road network bna iit iim baki sab vo to Jadu ki jhadi se ban gya kisi ko rojgar nhi mila
Average chamcha supporter: rojgar=sarkari naukari
@@yksingh3259 15 lakh account me aayege this also left 😂
Bhai sab ka fact check karte ho jo nupur sharma boli thi oska bhi fact check kro
Lallan top ek 5
2 baar video dekha sahi se shamj nahi aaya aadhe se jayada sar ke uper se guzra
Or ab samvidhan ko hi badal ne ko bol rahe dharm raj ko bol rahe ye kon desh drohi log hai mujhe btane ki jarurat nai
Mai ganrall hu lekin sc st aarakchar ko sapot karta hu q ki enhi log ne savidhan bachaya hai
You dont think so that this show what they made is one side biased if you covering whole scenario uou should cover each and every point of that history
Sir as i know history cannot be cover in 20-30 min that was a big discussion about 1st amendment you should made this video with a proper day by day story to make views view to clear this look like ine sided to show one group of people what they do against Constitution of India. But it is not justify people took an idea of this and use this opinion that if they had done in past why not today we can amended constitution as a need sir if you are going to cover a history pls make sure let it cover in a seria of videos 🙏
Congress party aaj kal Samvidhaan Samvidhaan Samvidhaan chaati pe lagaye ghoom rahi hai. Lekin Samvidhaan banane wale Bana Saheb ko chunaav harane wali Congress, Unko Bharat Ratan nahi dene wali Congress. Sna hai Nehru jee ne Khud ko hi Bharat Ratan de diya tha. 😂😂
This was a disappointing video. The information provided was inadequate and one-sided. Mr Tripurdaman Singh fails to provide the background in which the amendment was made. At that time, communalism was at its peak. The Father of the Nation had been assassinated and illiteracy and superstitions were through the roof. To make matters worse, communists had announced a violent revolution against India. All these forces were disseminating hateful and divisive ideas all over India. People like Pandit Nehru, Rajaji, and Dr Ambedkar realised that something had to be done to protect the unity of India and the well-being of Indians. Mr Singh makes it seem like nobody could oppose Pandit Nehru. Is that really the case? Did Rajaji and Dr Ambedkar not oppose him? But when they did, did they mention the amendment brought to free speech?
How problematic situation was prior to the amendment can be understood from the fact that a judge had given a judgement that said that preaching murder and inciting violence were allowed as they came under freedom of speech. Those who are interested can read more about this here:
'Freedom of expression was once wide-ranging in India. Then Jawaharlal Nehru asked for changes'
-Scroll
This was not expected from Lallantop. Mr Singh's works clearly carry an unjustifiable anti-Nehru undercurrent. His book on him was also somewhat shallow and displayed a lack of engagement with his ideas and the context in which he was working. Please don't look at only one side of the story.
Edit: Just how partial Mr Singh's views can be grasped from the fact that he did not highlight the following words of Sardar Patel:
“I find no legal powers to deal with either Press or men like Syama Prasad Mookerjee. Before you left for Indonesia, I drew your attention to the Supreme Court decision in [the] Cross Roads and Organiser cases. That knocks the bottom out of most of our penal laws for the control and regulation of the Press. The views which they have expressed in that judgment on the question of sedition make it doubtful whether we can do anything not only about the speeches of Syama Prasad Mookerjee but also those of the more extremist type. As you say, we have involved ourselves in so many legal and constitutional difficulties that we do not know how to overcome them. I sounded a note of warning and caution when these provisions were being debated in the Drafting Committee, but then we were led away by our idealistic exuberance. We seldom paused to consider the practical and administrative applications of the many constitutional provisions and even their interrelation. My own feeling is that very soon we shall have to sit down and consider constitutional amendments.”
They are present in the Scroll article. Again, why did the Lallantop team not look into this? There's already so much misinformation about our founders. If those who have significant influence and don't believe in the politics of hate will not do what they need to, then how will we have any hope of defending the truth?
sab jagah to discrimation , women ko barabar ke chakr me men ko hi piche kar diya,
Keya samvidhan sabha ke sadasyon ko ye baaten samajh nahi aai thee? Jab OBC ke reservation ke liye sanshodhan kiya gaya toh ye reservation dene mein etna samay keyon laga? Keya ye sanshodhan election ke baad nahi ho sakta tha.
*kitna acha hota agar Jinnah nehru ko v apne sath Pakistan le jata, mera desh aaj bahut tarakki kar chuka hota, ye Nehru ki choti soch thi jisne apne sashan ko bachaye rakhne ke liye desh ke savi udhyamo pe kabja kar liya tha, agar PV Narsimha Rao na hote to nehruwadi iss desh ko 1400 year pichhe dhakel dete* 🙏🙏
Waah mere sher waah yeh knowledge kisne diya aap ko
Dr bhimrao ambedkar ne sambhidhan ke article 32 ko sambhidhan ki atma kaha tha Nehru ne 9vi anusuchi lakar sambhidhan ki hatya kar di thi dushri hatya indara gandi ne ki aur tisari hatya Rahul gandhi ne jab usne Manmohan singh ki cabinet se paas prstav ko press ke samne far diya Nehru aur Nehru ke vansaj sambhidhan aur kanun ko nahi mante
ललनटोप की 123 वाली व्यख्या गलत है अब आरक्षण का मतलब है बगसा मिलेगा चाहे आपको जरूरत है या नहीं
दुसरे को नहीं मिलेगा चाहे आप देखो या ना देख सको
Land reforms ek bahut bda decision tha
इसमे बहुत अच्छा प्रोपेगैंडा है😂😂😂😂😂 क्या मतलब कि अब ए सरकार पूर्वांचल के लडको को कानून सिखाएगी। 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 हमने अपनी जमीन अपने खरीद के बनाई है ना कि सरकार के भीख से
सरकार ब्राम्हण और कूर्म के लडको को कानून सिखाइए😂😂😂😂जो लोग पहले खुद ही अपनी जमीन अपने परिवारों का नाम करके राजनीति में आए😂😂😂😂😂 मोदी जी का जय सरदार पटेल का नारा उत्तर प्रदेश में लगाना पंडित मदन मोहन मालवीय जिंदाबाद के नारे लगाना😅😅😅😅 सब झूठा था जो लल्लनटॉप को नारे लगवा रही हैं।
10 % ब्राह्मणों राजपूतों ने हिंदू मुस्लिम करके देश के हर संसाधन पर कब्जा कर लिया चाहे आईएएस आईपीएस जज कोई भी पोस्ट हो
Nila kabutar ko muslim sabse jada paila gawar.
Check karle
भाजपा की तरफदारी करने के लिए इतिहास को खोदा जा रहा है।
Nehru Ji Samvidhan ka Sansodhan Desh ki Janta ke Blayi ke liye Badla tha Aur Modi Ji Samvidhan ka Sansodhan Adani Aur BJP ke liye Badal raha hai 😂😂😂😂 india alliances jindabaad ❤❤❤
पंडित नेहरू देश के विभाजन के लिए बड़े उतावले थे। उनका मानना था अब हम बूढ़े हो चुके हैं। जेल जाने की हिम्मत भी नहीं रही है। पंडित नेहरू जी के विचारों के सामने गांधी जी को झुकना पड़ा और देश का विभाजन हो गया। यह पंडित नेहरू जी की पहली भयंकर भूल थी। मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना तथा मुसलमान नेताओं के इशारे पर हिंदुओं तथा सिखों का कत्लेआम शुरू हो गया। माताओं तथा बहनों का सामूहिक बलात्कार, लूट-पाट आगजनी एवं कत्लेआम चरम सीमा पर पहुंच गया। लगभग 30 लाख हिंदू सिख मारे गए थे। इस विभाजन का विरोध आर्य समाज हिंदू महासभा, सनातन धर्म तथा राष्ट्रीय स्वयं-सेवक संघ ने किया पर पंडित नेहरू अपनी जिद पर अटल रहे। यह पंडित नेहरू जी की पहली बड़ी भूल थी।
@@tayutaku7797 पंचशील समझोता करके तिब्बत और कैलाश मानसरोवर चीन को देकर कौनसा भलाई का काम किए बे 😂😂😂😂
@@Bharat_kumar8 Tibet Kabhi india ka hissa nahi tha lekin Modi Ji ke Sarkar mein Chin Kuch Arunachal Pradesh se Zamin Harap Liya Aur Kuch Ladakh se bhi Pta nahi Modi ke Chappan inch wale Sine Sikur ke chappan centimetre ho gaye aur Laal laal Ankh Shayad Safahed ho gaye
Wah re sher @@tayutaku7797 kya gajab dhoya gobr bhakt ko
COK kiska tha?@@tayutaku7797
BJP kam hi hai ki nehru aur congress ki gltiya nikalna air kya kr skti religion ke nam pr ldana bs itnahi ata hai inko
Lallantop waley kab reservation lagu karenge.....Khud...vaii chun chun k...merit waley log latey h....or ..badi badi batein karte h ...abey thoda khud b lagu kardo
What a joke..bhedbhav ki baat krti hai democracy..reservations laga ke general students ke sath jo majak kiya hai wo democracy nahi hai..jati ke naam pr na batne ki baat keh kr jati ke naam pr benefits detey ho..kya general category wale garib nahi hotey..kya sab obc or sc st wale gareeb hai..luxury office se bahar niklo tab pata lagega..iss soo called democracy me general category wale general he banke reh gaye hai..
संविधान का सम्मान सबसे ज्यादा नेहरू जी ने ही किया आजकल के नेता होते तो संविधान का क्या होता भगवान जाने।
😂😂 चल be
Ek admi n lehru ko dictator bola usko jail me daal diya
Hote ? Aajkal k netao k pass 2 baar majority thi. Kitni baar sanvidhan k basic structure me change Kiya Aaj k netao ne ?
@@yksingh3259 saabit karo
Nehru wohi na Jo Mountbatten ki wife ko 😂😂😂😂
Dharmnirpeksh word kisne dala savidhan se bhagwan ki photo Q hataye
Aapka tone election ke result ke baad kaise change ho gaya..this proves you people are slaves of power.. congress power me to Rahul Gandhi dost.. BJP to modi dost..
😂😂😂
Neharu Indira Gandhi ne desh ka vikas nahi kiya kiya hota to Bharat aaj vikasit desh hota
Constitution should be amended regarding religion to make Hindustan Sir jai Hind Jai Hindustan Jai MODI Jai BJP 🙏
Kapde apne size ke pehna kar bhai😂
It was beginning of the time some changes were needed at that time. And much more needed otherwise dictator like modi can keep doing crimes against humanity
*ohh ! nehru ke ande aaj v chamchagiri me lage h 😂 emergency tere abbu ne lagai kya 😂 Hitler se v bada dictator tha Nehru*
*ohh ! nehru ke ande aaj v chamchagiri me lage h 😂 emergency tere abbu ne lagai kya 😂 Hitler se v bada dictator tha Nehru*
*ohh ! nehru ke ande aaj v chamchagiri me lage h 😂 emergency tere abbu ne lagai kya 😂 Hitler se v bada dictator tha Nehru*
Nehru indian angraj thaa 👊
Pappu ka Nana-Dadi sab Tanashahi ka Rule Kiya 😢😢😢Dukhat hai.
अनुराग ठाकुर के पेट में दर्द तो होगा ही बेचरे का जमींदारी प्रथा खत्म हो गया था 😅
Bhag jao
Bikauoi