Multiple Russian Vehicles Destroyed in Failed Attack on Yampolivka, Kreminna
Vložit
- čas přidán 29. 01. 2024
- Three otu of four Russian vehicles attacking Yampolivka were destroyed by accurate artillery from Ukraine. Two infantry fighting vehicles and one unidentified tank. These were hit by arillery east of Yampolivka near Kreminna.
NAFO Link
www.help99.co/patches/suchomi...
When this is over, Ukraine is gonna have some of the most proficient battle hardened troops on the planet if they don't have them already.
and the most traumatized vets in the world
@@nguyentoan8169 Unfortunately there will be some degree of trauma. Would be nice if Russia would just stop being Russia for once and move in a direction of cooperation and peace with the rest of the world instead of being backstabbing and scheming snakes, but Russia has been this way for centuries. I doubt they'll change anytime soon.
Maybe, but the PTSD and mental anguish from it all is going to hurt more sadly. War is disgusting.
@@nguyentoan8169 Nothing like the Orcs will have. Even more psychopaths will be returning than they have to experience in peace time.
If the West abandons these men, it will not go well for anyone.
Vehicle #4 looks like a bulk smoke flare cook-off to me, similar to what we saw with the Bradleys vs T90 event. Not clear if that means this tank was completely "rogered" or not.
That was good of you to label them, because I was getting confused. So many.
So many Russian mothers, wives and kids who will not even know for months that their man is gone. The stupidity of starting this war is going to change Russia forever. Not soon, but forever.
And #2 had a pile of soldiers sitting on top of it.
Russian "active armor"
Russia has spent a lot of time and resources developing the new IRA (Inert Reactive Armor) armor system called 'Glupy-20', which can be easily applied to any vehicle, and is much cheaper than Kontakt-5, and made entirely from indigenous materials and technology. Some estimations are that Russia has the production capacity for as many as 1.6 million pieces of it a year, and you can usually cover a vehicle with less than 20 pieces.
The concept is when the IRA is struck by enemy fire, the armor piece falls off the vehicle, taking the projectile with it, preventing penetration of the vehicle.
Unfortunately, the protection from APFSDS and HEAT are pretty poor.
What’s the unfortunate bit? @@burnttoast111
@@burnttoast111 I remember back to the start of the SMO, there was a lot of talk that the ERA or IRA blocks were wood and quite useless, all courtesy of normal day to day RU corruption.
@@ChicagoDB The whole thing is a joke, that the soldiers on top are armor. Glupy is the Russian word for 'stupid' or 'silly'.
Guys, thanks for donation! We are at 26.502,14 € of 36.000 €. The campaign is 76% done. Proud to do campaign with you!
Looks like the 45th Artillery brigade is having fun with their FH77 Archers to me.
Most likely also using BONUS rounds.
Been talks of Archer having a 90%+ when it comes to accuracy on moving IFVs and Tanks.
This is also the operating area for both 21st mech brigade and 45th arty brigade so the chance is indeed quite high.
FH77 and Archer is 2 different systems, with some common parts.
It has been estimated that Russia will loose 900 tanks this year. This may need updating.
Unfortunately, it is also estimated that Russia can produce 100 tanks per month, which gives it 1,200 per year.
Like the thousands of almighty T-14 and SU-57 that are so advanced no one can see them on the battlefield, not even russians @@gregowski_pl
@@gregowski_pl This claim has been entirely de-bunked a long time ago. They are lucky if they can produce or repair 20 a month and that will become increasingly harder as the parts get tougher to source. This isn't the 80's when they had 5 tank factories, they have one now and that is so poorly run it has gone bankrupt twice and had to be bailed out financially by the Kremlin.
@gregowski_pl
I saw an estimate that said 200/mo but who knows what to believe. The Ironworks to run a tank line can't be an easy thing to throw together.
@@gregowski_pl Ruzzia can NOT produce 100 tanks a month lmfao. 10 Would be realistic... but i highly doubt that. Smoke some reality dude, or go outside to breath some fresh air.
Check out the turret toss at 0:05
If Russia is ever allowed back into the Olympics there is no question they will dominate the turret toss event.
Russia's losses are unsustainable for them in the long run although they can continue for a number of years. Their first goal is not to show any weakness until Trump is back in power.
russia has plenty of tanks not to mention that they are actually producing all variants of armored vehicles.
@@xisotopex Yes, they have pretty much stopped producing anything but weapons. Very profitable in the long run 😁.
Trump is over. The normal people won.
@@80-80.
well whatever, their economy grew by something like 3-4% this last quarter. its pretty simple, they are transitioning to a war footing economically and its finally starting to pay off for them. I can tell from your post that you know nothing about the economics of war, but pretty much every single country ever involved in a large war does this. the US did it during WWII of course, germany didnt actually do this until 1944? or thereabouts. russians are suffering, but putin doesnt care, and its not to the point that it is destabilizing. unless we give ukraine the ammo they need, they will not be able to win, and if our politicians keep doing this, russia at some point will actually have a chance to win. Russia is getting stronger, now, after a period of degradation and weakness, the window is closing.
USA says that Russian tank production plus repaired are now same as their losses ,around 100 a month .So probably they an go at this rate forever except for tank crews ,probably reason i saw in last video that tank driver was at least 60 years old
I can't understand how Ruzzia is able to keep getting people to climb in to these tin cans.
Surely the word must be getting to them how the ones that left before didn't return and the stories told by the odd crew that manages to escape from these failures.
I can only assume drugs are involved.
Suchomimus - UKR says it shot down another ork SU-34 in Luhansk.
3:28 That's white phosphorous smoke grenades cooking off but looks like an ammunition fire too, so likely a turret penetration.
WP doesn't burn like that
Ack, Smoke dis-chargers going off for sure. Not sure about the phosphorus but then again not overly familiar with Russian smoke cans
Zoomed right out, its not far from Grimsby..
💛🔱💙 Slava Ukraina! Heroyam Slava! ❤️🖤
I'd add:
0:02 BMP firing. Looks like to its front-right.
0:04 What looks to be a smoking vehicle on the tree line in back right of the shot.
0:17 It seems to just be coincidence but there is a secondary explosion in the burning wreck of "No. 2" just before the artillery strike hits the tree line on the bottom right.
0:20 The tank popping smoke. Not getting hit/exploding.
0:25 There is smoke from a 'small' caliber hit to the field in the bottom left. There is a vehicle on the road on the bottom right, covered by smoke, heading toward the Russian vehicles. It doesn't appear in any other shot. Perhaps another Russian vehicle? It then proceeds to fire. What makes me think it is a Russian vehicle is that after it fires a round hits the in field next to the smoke that was already there, not going toward the vehicles. Though right after the shot is fired there is an explosion just in front of vehicle "No. 1". Probably coincidence again. Makes me think that there are (or the Russians think there are) Ukrainians in the tree line off screen to the left. And the vehicle that is firing that way keeps hitting the ground instead of what it is trying to aim at.
0:37 Looks like another artillery strike in front of vehicle "No. 1" rather than secondary explosions.
Brother for the amount of videos u put out either u dont eat sleep or you gotta hell of a crew. I ty from Pittsburgh pa usa. Where the shells are being made actually in.... pa
Slava Ukraini, heroyam slava! 🇳🇱❤️🇺🇦
The spectacular explosion of tank #4 is not a hit but actually a smoke screen being deployed. This system monitors the airspace around the tank and deploys the smoke screen (which also has hotter thermal signature to mask the tank for IR-homing missiles) upon detecting the incoming threat automatically. It also has a button for commander to fire it manually, e.g. to cover the retreat. I think this is exactly what he did here. So #4 is not a kill, likely.
Agree, if you go 0:20 and advance frame by frame, you can see the projectiles in the air before they explode - looks almost like white phosphorous - which, as you say, is to mask from IR homing missiles.
@@nickholden3976 how do you do to advance frame by frame ? I have only 0.5 or 0.25 speed on YT. Thanks
@@Fildefer17 , and . (comma and period - back and forward, respectively) when the video is paused (k).
@@nickholden3976 Nato uses red phosphorous smoke on vehicles, because of the intense IR it blocks out sensors. Probably the ruzzians are using it as well.
@@JonMartinYXD Thanks a lot ! comma (,) works but period (.) doesn't works. But maybe because it is a french keyboard AND a laptop ?
I'll search on the Net more deeply.
with apologies to looney tunes - ''four go out, only one comes back.''
Get out of Ukraine!
Based on the T90 vs Bradley video, that last tank "explosion" might have just been the tank deploying smoke to cover the retreat, so possibly only 2 vehicles knocked out.
Bobo h1ju3pu74.😂😂😂😂😂😂
That might be the smoke grenade ammo going up when the launchers (and a lot of other things) were destroyed. Looks way too big of a kaboom for it to just be deploying smoke.
Smoke grenades tend to get launched out a reasonable distance, then deploy smoke, or fuel is injected into the exhaust and smoke streams from behind, not just catastrophically explode on the tank itself.
Yeah I'm in two minds. It does seem to be smoke from smokescreen..it also looks pretty effective but the way it goes off just looks 'odd'. Some bits are thrown a bit away but it's not at all symmetrical...so maybe as above has said it fired when hit or maybe that's just how it looks. The cuts in the video make it hard to tell if the tank is there at the end unless someone's eyes are better than mine..
That was definitely the tank deploying smoke
Aren't there any other vids of the tanks actually deploying smoke? Maybe from before the war?
To use as a reference
Слава Україні
Thank you for your encouraging reports, Suchomimus. The analytical reports are gloomy at the moment, so you help improve morale.
1:09 i'm not sure thats a hit on that tank. looks like it deployed a smoke screen like that T-90 tank that got bitch slaped by that bradley.
Hi Such,
thank you.
I guess the question is can Russia keep up making new tanks above the rate they are getting trashed.
Great posts
How does artillery hit moving targets?
The same way a duck hunter hits a flying duck, only the artillery men use math to increase the odds of a strike.
There is also an ukrainian tank/ifv in action, as others mentioned - 1:09 shows all. If this is a tank - then both ruzzians were pretty direct destroyed, without any use of artillery or drones. The "new" arriving russians possibly know about it, or the tank has been already gone or destroyed. If this was an ifv - it would explains brave of arriving ruzzians... If the UA lost the tank here - it will change the comments of the clip :( -> UA hasn't got so many tanks or modern ifv as orcs bmp-s.
My guess would be Strix mortar ammo. It finds armor and strikes
"Engaged" is Ukrainian for "destroyed".
Geezzz ! I thought 4th of July was over !
Hey pass the Popcorn !
Dude, it´s insane how my comments are being automatically deleted from this channel! No matter what! And I´ve noticed this happening to other users as well! WTF youtube???!!!
BTW, CZcams is probably not going to delete this one, just to make me look crazy!
it is getting quite bad. Happens with my comments too
I just typed in W##t males on another channel and book it's gone deleted
CZcams a platform which fails to give feedback to the user when user input give no intended result.
happens to me too, just at other chans.. and yeah, getting worse
Three of those vehicles were all “number two”.
Is #4 the smoke dischargers being fired?
I think some of these ultra accurate apparent artillery strikes on moving targets we see are in fact direct fire from tanks, Abrams, Chally, or Leopard 2 from a couple miles out. Not saying its true in this case but it happens.
It looks to be top hits not side hits aka not possible with regular tanks if not on a dirt mound or a ramp....
STRV103c could theoretically elevate enough but given those are only in museums id say the chance i less than Stoltenberg not using his hands during a press conference.
Also i have never seen any pictures of STRV103c used to fire in that kinda of role.
@@danielkarlsson9326 Note I did not claim this particular incident was tank fire however the possibility should not be discounted entirely.
vehicle 4 , is that phosphorous cooking off ?
Shared on X
#4 Looks like it is Popping white phosphorus smoke and retreats.
Roger, Roger.
💙💛
Are the phosphorous rounds that vehicle number 4 could have had on board?
I'm pretty sure none of the atracks my brigade conducted at the Fort Erwin NTC looked like this. What was this "attack" supposed to achieve? How many meters of ground was it calculated to secure?
Or was it sent out by officers who are simply doing the minimum?
But but but. The Russian channels are celebrating the victory. Lol lop
I think that last one is the smoke launchers going off. The question there is was it by intent or due to an impact.
Are you sure the tank was destroyed? Or was that it's smoke going off?
💙💛💯💙💛😘
🇺🇦🦁💪
Vehicle made in Grimsby.
Hey, cut Grimsby some slack. One of my great grandfathers owned four trawlers that sailed out of there prior the WW1. Somewhere along the way the ball got dropped.
👍🇺🇦
#4 is hit with a white phosphorus round, part of which gets tossed back by reactive armor maybe?
0:20 smoke screen, can’t tell if it’s on purpose or caused by an explosion
0:21 no. 3 is retreating
0:26 weird cut, smokescreen is missing
0:29 next cut, smokescreen is up again
1:10 bottom right 30mil impacts or cluster artillery?
0:26 and 1:10 are the same footage. My guess is there is a ukrainian vehicle and that's why there is this weird cut in the clip.
No. 4 looked like a Buratino to me. Also supported by the white smoke which would come frome the magnesium in their thermobaric mixture.
tank #4 looks to be using smoke discharger, not an explosion.
The hit on the vehicle at about 1m 03 looks to be a mix of both...smoke creen launchers being blown by the incoming and something cooking off red hot material head far right
#4 looks like maybe it was using a chaf or a chaf got hit. Not sure it was disabled
Tank number 4 was fully loaded with ammo.
Once again, I find myself befuddled by rooshin tactics.
1. Why only 4 vehicles, and not 40 or 400?
2. Why isn't there a whole bunch of arty and air support?
3. Why is it that when one vehicle gets attacked, ALL of them STOP???
4. Why aren't they dispersing? If they're afraid of mines, how about starting a heavy sustained arty barrage to cover some mine clearance vehicles, who could then launch their mine clearing munitions and open up both fields for a general advance?
Maybe all of my questions are stupid. It's just that the approach the rooshins continue to use seems planned to maximize losses and minimize gains.
0:26 you missed the ukrainian vehicle bottom right on the road near the tree line. My guess is that there is an ukrainian position and the artillery hit you suggested to be a miss is actually russian artillery.
@@mushmouth no he's not. But nobody is perfect.
Wasn't Russia supposed to have captured Sloviansk and Kramatorsk by the end of January - last year?
According to the Orc ministry of stolen toilets, Igor has announced they have been captured about 8 times before.
LemmingZ
Grimsby here, stop using such big words please.
The people of Grimsby cannot deal with big words. Something we on the north bank have long known.😂👍
What is a grimsby?
A town in northeastern England. Such is from Mansfield, and this is jocular local rivalry. @@T.efpunkt
@@T.efpunkt An English port town on the eastern seaside.
And can you provide an Aussie-to-English translation guide please? Rogered, pear-shaped, came-a-cropper, etc. Some of us are slow.
The AFU always lets one Russian armored vehicle scurry home from an ambush to tell the tale of the woebegotten scurry forward.
NaNa NaNa NaNa Archer...
Has Oryx added those to “the butcher’s bill” yet?
Not artillery. Mines and drones hit the vehicles. Artillery shell using precision kits only has 10% to hit a static armor, not even mention a moving one.
Ukraine should be supplied with an airforce-worth of fighter aircraft,, such as the F-16s and longer-range precision munitions, such as ATACMS (more of them, and the longest-range variants should be provided), and the russian military facilities inside of russia should be considered legitimate targets. It is worth noting that support for military aid to Ukraine in America is over 80% and increasing. This is because Americans can see that not only is aiding Ukraine the ethical thing to do, it is the practical thing as well. America has spent only approximately 6% of our military budget so far to help Ukraine. However, over half of the russian army has been destroyed. This is a tremendous bargain by any measure! In addition to this,, when russia is defeated in this war, their barbaric ideology of imperialism will also be defeated, making Europe a more peaceful, stable place for many generations - as well as preventing a new arms race in the region. That is why billions spent today saves trillions tomorrow. The vast majority of Americans understand this. Americans also want to see Ukrainian military and civilian casualties minimized. This is why Americans are correct to support giving military aid to Ukraine.
Please write to your elected representatives to request this military aid. If you are a US citizen, please consider writing to President Biden and your other elected representatives, and demand Ukraine be given the above weapons - in war-winning quantities, and soon. The sooner we give Ukraine the weapons it needs to liberate all of its territory, the sooner this war will be over, and with fewer Ukrainian casualties. Letters can be submitted electronically via the Whitehouse website. One can also google for ones' elected representatives -- many of which have similar websites. One may simply write and submit a letter electronically to make one's desire known.
Have you written to DJT yet?
DJT needs to be sent extremely polite and clear messages that USA has a duty to stop Putin. Especially as there are more than enough elderly weapons (read paid for) that can be sent. To be fair he told Putin to stop using chemical weapons in Syria. Putin did it again and Trump hit Russian bases extremely hard. No Fs were given. This event kept Putin quiet until Biden’s ridiculous exit from Afghanistan.
@@mikeoglen6848
What is the difference between a dollar and a ruble?
Answer: A dollar.
@@mikeoglen6848 Do you perhaps refer to the orange stain? The emotionally challenged youngster that is prepared to loose a another election? No, I have not written to the orange stain, as he is not only not my elected representative, he is not an elected official. I have, however, written about the orange stain. I have also seen some quality memes about the orange stain, and seen several videos mocking him. A recent one is by the youtube user Фріоніс.
@@mikeoglen6848 Have you written to your elected representative in fascist ruZia? You could save money by writing your letter on a ruble banknote - it would be a cheaper source of paper than purchasing stationary paper. Oh, I'm just kidding - we all know there no real elections in fascist ruZia.
А где снег?
Those are tank shells striking not artillery
The two in the back weren't hit or rather we don't know that because the two white clouds are the white phosphorus smoke screen
Actually this is not an isolated event this happens all across the front lines , but eventually Russia bypasses those fields any way and takes the Ukrainian position despite losses. Russia affords losses Ukrainians don't.
Hey Suchomimus! I'm a born and raised Canadian so I'm not up on all British (Manchester?) slang. My name happens to be Roger and I've heard you use that name in a slang way like you did in this video many times. My gutter-ball mind can conjure up all sorts of "colourful" scenarios for what "Rogering" or being "Rogered" could mean. Um... should I be disturbed or offended or pleased/feel proud my name is getting used in that way? 🤔😉 (Great video by the way!) 👍
British slang
Rodger : Verb. To have sexual intercourse. E.g."The window cleaner was happy rogering his customers after cleaning their windows." [Mid 1600s]
Rodgering : Noun. An act of sexual intercourse. E.g."I'd give her a good rogering anytime she likes." [Late 1700s]
Hi Sucho, vehicle 4 is deploying smoke so it can cover the retreat, I don't think it was hit, if you watch the video back at 2.5 speed you can see the smoke grenades launch then explode.....only two vehicles destroyed here bud.
hi jack
🇺🇦🫡
The tank deploys a defense system
I wonder if these aren’t laser guided rounds like copperhead with the drone used as the laser designator
The white "explosion" in the rear (your vehicle number 4) is actually a vehicle using its smoke discharger.
80% casualty rate….mo army survives that long term
No comments today, CZcams keeps deleting them.
Or Biden. Lack of F16 and atacams looks very kind to Putin. Neither candidate looks anything but shaky.
Republicans in Congress are blocking aid to Ukraine. don't pretend this is the fault of Biden.
How can Putin keep up with these losses even with ramped up military production/ So far Russia's cost of war exceeds one hundred billion dollars at a time when the Ministry of Finance is reporting budget deficits for all months of 2023 and six months of 2022.
number 4 is deploying smoke. its just that its misfires like 50% of the pack so it looks so weird. another quality product russia can be proud of. do find it funny that these guys think that a smokscreen/flares is effective defence against a incoming (guided) artillery round. from the highly accurate shots it seems that the FH77 are being used considering the hit rate against moving targets.
That "very big blast" was just that vehicle popping its smoke screen. Its possible the smoke launchers were hit, and that caused them to deploy, but that wasn't a "big blast"
3:12 isnt that simply the tank deploying smoke? Doesnt look like a explosion for me.
No that is all it's smoke units cooking off at once. Normal deployment is very different in that the grenades are fired from the tank and smoke deploys around it, around 15-20mtrs They don't ignite all over the tank. Same thing happened to the T90 that tangled with the Wolverine called Brad
Sometimes the smoke amunition are set off when the tank is hit , for me it looks like too much smoke at the same time and in too random of a paterm to think they have launch intencionally, it might be just external damage to the tank too.
@@patrickkelly6691 no it's deploying smoke to cover the retreat of the bmp, we can see the smoke grenades launch then deploy. Everything according to how it was done.
I think that vehicle 4 popped smoke and wasn’t damaged, doesn’t look like it was hit
These hits are not artillery but ukrainian tank from the left and russian mortars
Do you think the Russian Soldiers have a headache?
I'm thinkin' about half the Orcs in this column don't have a care in the world anymore.
The tank in the back is deployed its smoke launchers, not exploding.
Vehicle 4 looked like it just discharged smoke grenades. Are we sure it was destroyed?
One attack out of how many, they still losing ground and have not regain any major percentage of lost cities or ground.
Gee . . . I thought the large areas of Kharkov, Kherson, and the Western part of the Black Sea were pretty significant. Not to mention the area that little putin had to abandon in the North. LOL!!
Russia, yes you are right.they are total losers.
@@hardtackbeans9790 If the GLSDB's have arrived they might as well put Crimea as 'battle zone' now too. They may not be winning yet but Mordor is definitely losing as regardless of the outcome it will take them many years to make up lost economic and military power.
then,,, why did Ukraina lose 18% !! of his territory to Russia ??
Why do so many trolls use comma instead of full stop? Is it an Indian thing?
British thing @@stream2watch
Vatnik grammar.
Interesting how you have a Japanese reference in your username, yet the Japanese language has no noun genders. What do you mean with HIS territory? Hacked account?
ask JOSH HOLDER
THE NEW YORK TIMES
SHARE
Sep 29, 2023 @@stream2watch
Unfortunately, Russia still has a shitload of tanks and MTLBs.