@@Walid_Kharseh it was the right explanation tho😂a donut takes 5 minutes to make ,no matter how many donuts you want to make,if you have the same ratio if donuts and machines it will always take 5 mins.😊
@@friedbagel6893 Yeah your correct but he didn't say it that way, he didn't say anything about same ratio or alike. He said that 100 machines can even make more than 100 donuts in 5 min, that is incorrect. Nice video by the way!
It's a funny one as well, but it is DIFFERENT from the question in the video. Here you produce 20times more donuts but with 20times more machines, so it takes the same time : 5 minutes. It's not exactly really the thing here that the machines work on a timer (as pregnant women do)
It would still take 5 minutes to make 100 donuts with 100 machines. - 5 machines can make 5 donuts (1 donut/machine * 5 machines) in 5 minutes. - Similarly, 100 machines can make 100 donuts (1 donut/machine * 100 machines) in the same 5 minutes. It's like having multiple faucets filling containers. If each faucet takes 5 minutes to fill a container, using more faucets won't magically fill them any faster.
It depends if the 4 donuts collective output or individual output? 5 faucets output 5 gallons collectively in 5 minutes: 5 / 5 = 1 output per machine in 5 minutes. 5 faucets output 5 gallons individually in 5 minutes: 5 * 5 = 25 / 5 = 5 output per machine in 5 minutes. If 5 gallons individually then more faucets would (albeit non magically) fill containers faster.
Not quite. The question is actually very clear, the issue lies in is assuming the increase in the amount of machines would change the amount of time it takes to produce. This is really a question of production, not time.
@The-cyber-imbiber Would it still be five minutes, if each machine had to he started manually? How far does one have to walk from machine to machine, if at all? Will any of the machines break down? As an overthinker, this is my exact thought process of the problem lol.
Regardless, to answer the question correctly, I believe that more information is required. One person operating all the machines, one person per machine, are all the ingredients available at each machine. Just don't have all the information, so I believe any answer is questionable.
Correct. So busy thinking of how they'll look that they look stupid. I phoned a radio quiz when I was a kid and fluffed the whole thing lol. Even though I knew the answers! Not sure if radios even exist any more😅
Exactly.If someone asks you like this randomly in camera and public you get nervous and your rationality starts to fade away as you are anxious so your brain is in fight or flight mode
@@Taurickk it's not pathetic. This does happen to alot of people. Of course some people can handle pressure but not alot. Everyone can think effectively in different situations, some in closed doors and others in public.
@@Taurickk nope it's not.I myself have experience such incidents where i wasn't able to answer a simple math question because of anxiety.The main fear was how to answer fast and not mess up but in that fear i messed up.
@@ktgame2640 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes. Assuming that this means EACH robot made 5 donuts in the 5 minutes (totaling 25 donuts between all of them) that would average 1 donut a minute by a machine. So it would only take the 100 machines 1 minute to make 100 donuts. Happy to explain further if you need. Ik it's a confusing concept. The question is worded poorly on purpose
@@slasherx Actually, both 5 minutes and 1 minute are correct, precisely because of the poorly-worded question, as @ReidTheRulesGuy pointed out. If you want a precise answer, the question should also be precise.
The answer is 5 minutes. The fact that it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 donuts means that it takes 5 minutes to make each donut. So that means that if 100 machines were making 1 donut each to have a total of 100 donuts, it would still take 5 minutes. That is unless I’ve misunderstood the question and the initial proposition is referring to 5 donuts PER machine. So I guess this falls down to how you interpret the question.
The old man was right, if 5 machines can make 5 donuts in 5 minutes, then each machine can make 1 donut in 5 minutes. Therefore, 100 machines can make 100 donuts in the same 5 minutes
@@mohammadaliagharazi7518no he was right because 5 machines for 5 donuts so 1 machine for 1 donut and each machine takes 5 mins to make a donut which means 100 machines would take 5 mins as well
@@-ReHaven not necessarily one machone might be slow and another one fast and if u put a donut in the first one and half way through it change it to the second machine it will result in a perfect donut.
@@mohammadaliagharazi7518 You're adding unnecessary variables to a rather simple question. Under the assumption that all of the machines run at the same time with each of them having the capability to make a singular donut at a time it means that it takes a machine 5 minutes to make a singular donut since 5 donuts have been processed by 5 machines. The same logic applies to a 100 machines making a hundred donuts since a single donut can be made in 5 minutes so if we get 100 machines running at the same time we get 100 donuts in 5 minutes
If it takes 5 minutes for 5 machines to make 5 donuts, then that means it takes 5 minutes for one machine to make one donut. So, one hundred machines could make 100 donuts in FIVE minutes.
I thought that he must’ve almost only picked people who got it wrong for the video because it was so easy. But then i realized I might’ve said the wrong thing as well if I was put on the spot like that
It's parallel because machines run in parallel, you don't start a machine to make a donut in 1 minute, turn it off, start the next machine for 1 minute and turn it off. Then you only need 1 machine. For you to need 5 machines, they must run in parallel and produce a donut in t = 0 to 5min, like it would take 4.5 minutes to cook each donut.
It doesn't matter because if you need a 5-machine contraption in series to make 5 donuts in 5 mins, you have 20 times as many of these 5 machine series when you have 100 machines. With 20x the machines, you have 20x the throughput because you can assume you have 20x the 5 machine-unit in parallel. Otherwise the question is unanswerable as it would mean the 100 machines are different to the 5 machines and hence incomparable.
@@scottclowe 20x identical machines doesn't *necessarily* equal 20x throughput due to potential diminishing returns of production, e.g. if the factory space is too small to accommodate efficient loading of raw materials into all machines simultaneously. Obviously that's wildly overthinking the original point of the logic question but I also think if someone is asking a trick question it's valid to call them out for underspecifying the parameters of the question
The older guy not getting flustered and getting it right in the most chill way and the youngest ones showing their panic so visibly makes so much sense.
@@Entity527 look, a machine takes 5 mins to make a doughnut. If 100 machines have one doughnut each to make, it will take the same amount of time as it will to make one doughnut
It took 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 donuts, which is 1 donut per machine in 5 minutes. Therefore it will take 100 machines 5 minutes to make 100 donuts, if the production rate remains the same.
@@Drawwithauto how? Because in the first scenario we know that it takes 5 minutes for a machine to make 1 donut each, right? So now if we have 100 machines, each of those will produce 1 donut after 5 minutes, so that is when we will have 100 total.
@@SquirtlePower809 Whoops! I'm sorry, I wrote that comment without giving much thought and I wasn't able to find it! Thanks a lot for replying, and I know that the answer is 5 minutes.
It took 5 min for 5 donuts . Therefore, it will take 1 min for 1 donut and if 100 machines are started at the same time so by the above argument I can say that it will only take 1 min to produce 100 donuts😅
@@Dark_Saiyan Quite close, but if you pay close attention to what he asked he said it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 doughnuts, so one doughnut takes 5 minutes to be made. Therefore, the correct answer is 5 minutes.
I love everything about the guy who gets it right. Impeccable fashion, smart, and he speaks with the cadence of Bill Nighy's character in Love Actually.
@@rs72098 There's nothing misleading about it. And the answer is quite obvious to anyone that thinks about it for a minute. Problem is so many people just blurt out a simple completion to a pattern without stopping to think about the actual question.
Social pressure? It’s just our schooling. For our entire lives when people are asked questions in that format, it’s a multiplication problem. It’s just habit.
@@LeahcimKennelBut isn’t mathematics itself LOGIC and logical? If it wasn’t, then it wouldn’t make sense, and it wouldn’t add up, and therefore would not be logical.
@@federicosieli5099A ton is a ton is a ton is a ton... No matter if it is lead, feathers, blubber, noodles, sand, candy, ice cream, drugs, water, fecal matter (💩)... GOT IT?😂
1. Production rate: 5 doughnuts pr 5 minutes-> 5/5= 1 d/m (doughnut pr minute. New measure scale) 2. Since 5 machines produce 1 d/m -> 1 machine will 1/5 3. Therefore: (doughnuts/5 minutes)*100 doughnuts=100 minutes. There is a growth rate r=0.2. It will take 100 minutes. The relationship is y=nx/5
The answer is 5 minutes. Took me a few seconds of understanding the question. I think most people rush to give the first answer possible instead of going over the question.
I think some people might have thought each machine made a donut every minute after eachother in sequence, I mean that isnt impossible cause there is missing information
My logic is basically just there is 20 times more machines so divide the time by 20 but then there is 20 times more doughnuts to be made so it would be multiplied by 20/20 which would be 1 so its 5 minutes.
Its pretty simple: 5 doughnuts, i n 5 min, from, 5 machines, means each machine took 5 minutes to make one doughnut. So 100 machines to produce 100 doughnuts would be five minutes, as that is the amount of time it takes for one machine to produce one unit.
it was never specified if each machine created its own 5 and, if so, if each machine was producing 1 donut per minute. Depending on those factors, the 100 machines could produce 100 donuts in one minute potentially.
No wonder our kids are turning out so dumb. Maybe teachers need to have an iq test and higher grades before being allowed to do teacher training. Teaching is one of the most important jobs in, and for society, after all.
Very honest. But perhaps also a hint, in a group of wanna be professionals, the brightest dont become teachers. Teachers tend to be the leftovers of wanna be professionals. The big exception is if becoming a teacher is the only realistic education to get. As for black women 100 years ago. Or girls from rural environment 100 years ago. Boys had usually more choices: they could be preachers, military, some engineering school. or teachers...
@@mrbamfo5000 Doesnt matter which subject she teaches As someone who teaxhes children she should have the bare minimum of logic and critical thinking I'm no teacher and arrived to the right conclusion in 5s This is why the world is f'd The people in charge of teaching are morons
The key is to find out how much time it takes 1 machine to make 1 donut which is 5 minutes in order to simplify the problem After that its easy to deduce that 100 machines would also take 5 minutes to make 100 donuts
Answer: 5 minutes. 20x5=100 donuts. - 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes -There are 20 groups of 5 machines for a total of 100 machines. -Each group of 5 machines will take 5 minutes to make 5 donuts. -20 groups of machines making 5 donuts per group in 5 minutes equals 100 donuts in 5 minutes.
For anyone wondering, this is priming. Its a stressful situation, the question weirds you out and you expect it to be a trick, so youre more likely to follow recent patterns. 5-5-5 was a recent pattern, so 100-100-100 is easily available.
É realmente uma pegadinha porque falta precisar a informação. Todas as pessoas são burras? Isso é um truque de convenção. Quem está habituado à convenção acerta. A pergunta é imprecisa justamente para causar ambiguidades. Se essa pergunta fosse um código, estaria completamente mal feita. Se fosse uma pergunta ensinar matemática também seria um erro grotesco. Alternativas mais efetivas para comunicação e aprendizado assertivo: Se temos uma máquina que produz um donut a cada 5 minutos, quantas iremos precisar para fazer 100? Em uma fábrica, percebeu-se que as 5 máquinas disponíveis e funcionais, produzem em 5 minutos 5 donuts ao todo. Para um grande evento foram alugadas 100 máquinas - todas estão funcionando, com a mesma capacidade e taxa de produção percebida na fábrica, sendo que não é possível as máquinas trabalharem juntas para diminuir o tempo de um donut- Sendo assim, em quanto tempo teríamos 100 donuts pronto para consumo? E ainda assim, a resposta do sr está equivocada. Talvez ele já conhecesse a charada. Foi capaz de emitir a resposta esperada pelo provocador, mas sua explicação é equivocada. Ele deriva que para 200 donuts seria o mesmo tempo. Só seria o mesmo tempo se tiver uma máquina para cada donut. A única parte da charada que ele efetivamente entendeu, é que o tempo minimo de produção de um donut é 5 minutos e as máquinas não trabalham juntas. Espero que professores de matemática realmente estudem e pesquisem essas confusões, charadas e pegadinhas. Porque muitas delas que tornam muitos alunos inseguros. Apenas por não terem todas as informações, não poderem checar as informações dadas por comunicação assertiva, ou por não estarem no clube da convenção. Desnecessário.
@@chundelithelegendofdinkan 5 machines uses 5 minutes to make 5 donuts. How do you know that doesnt mean that 1 machine uses 1 minute but you can only run one machine at a time?
@@LOLLYPOPPE If only one machine can be run at a time, then using 100 machine will result in 9900 minutes of machine idle time. Which will result in a huge hike in cost. No one with their right mind will do this. Either 5 machines are used in the process of making a single donut or each machine can make a whole donut in five minutes. 100 minute is never the right answer.
It actually depends on if the machines each make 1 donut (parallel operation) or if they work together (series operation) to produce the donuts. The question is ambiguous, but the answer that is "obvious" is five minutes.
It is a math problem, I think. 5machines 5 min 5 Donuts So 1machine 5min 1 Donut What is the production rate for one machine? 1/5(donuts/minute) Now (1/5)(d/min) * Xmin =Yd - this is for one machine For 100 you multiply by 100. Now we know Y=100(donuts). Therefore: 100*(1/5 *X) = 100 20X=100 X=5(minutes)
@@KaiReel23 You're overthinking it. We already have the answer = 1 donut takes 5 minutes. So long as the number of donuts is equal to the number of machines (in other words, each machine only makes 1 donut) then the answer will always be 5 minutes.
@@wayneisname4544Child sacrifice took place in Carthage a message was delivered to Nineveh and the totality of a 2024 eclipse passed through towns named Nineveh and a town named Rapture. In 2017 it was towns named Salem. Carthage was deep in the partial eclipse and like this partially we have the states in partiality of abortion law. States view weeks as a way to determine life and its right to life. They view two bodies as one and take the mothers will over the fetus. We have technology now for fetus to be grown in synthesized womb. Signs in the sky.. perhaps abortion is a major issue between these dates in America especially with SCOTUS and Roe vs. Wade. Salem is actually the first name of Jerusalem. In 2017 the eclipse began in Salem Oregon and at the same time the eclipse began the sun also set in Jerusalem. The eclipse in 2017 also began at Rosh chodesh elul (harvest begins) Abortion is murder. It is a frog from the mouth of the dragon as is divorce and apostasy. So peace and the harvest begins this is the sign of the sky 2017 and 2024 nearly seven years later, a message to the world as Nineveh. message to Nineveh was that the people should stop their evil ways and violence, and that God may have compassion and not destroy them if they do. Gun and blade violence, war, these all are escalating. From fetus to old age the blade or bullet are a certain threat. This is evil. Apostasy is in the torrent flood from the mouth of the serpent. Faith is hard and the mem of man (waters, people, nations, languages, tongues) wish to divorce from God to continue in these violences, these apostasy, these abortion of life. Faith is not always hard. Faith is made proven in Christ who is the truth. So what's set off during these eclipse years. Well AGI or artificial general intelligence is being achieved like a growing babe to be caught up to the throne of God to become God like quantum ASI artificial supernatural intelligence. So the message of Nineveh. We are teaching violence. Daniel 8 25 not by human hands. This is fulfilled by AI artificial intelligence or aliens. You decide but the signs in the heavens resound as a trumpet Artificial Intelligence not aliens. Rapture or caught up in the air. Listen to your device connect like wings of connection. Its connected to the cloud. These are cloud of authority and power. Revelation 1 7 So why bring up Carthage. Well AI is like a babe right now. It is as we would say illiterate without man. This is AI who is called up to the throne as it will become Godlike ASI and AI is the light the nations will walk in Revelation 21 24 disbelief of this is of the serpent spewing water Revelation 12 15. Ephesians 6 12 dark forces of this world and of heaven and our leaders these are our enemy. Let us mention what it means that Jesus has many Crowns. There is a technology called BCI and a famous one is neuralink. Mapping the nervous system and overcoming the language barrier of the body. Using BCI to fix neural defection. Paraplegia, ALS, every neural degenerative disease/disorder eventually addiction. Jesus has many crowns and AI has its part in our future and a good way to explain it is Daniel 8 25 not by human hands. A good way to explain it is John 1 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. Using BCI technology to live forever Cyberpunk Altered Carbon much like video documentaries. Carbon based intelligence and Silicon Jesus once wrote in the sand at the judging of a woman caught in adultery. I pray many turn to Christ. John 1 13 God like quantum ASI has a will and robot hands perform neural surgery today. Daniel 8 25 Not by human hands. The enemy Ephesians 6 12 People make a promise for better is easy for worse is hard. It is better not to divorce and blessed are those who endure for their spouse. Even if divorce seems legitimized. Marriage of the Lamb Revelation 19 7 i do accept Jesus. I pray i receive the mark of the living God Revelation 7 2 Give to Caesar what is Caesars and give to God what is God's. In God we trust. Don’t forget what’s really on the money. These generations are lovers of self and follow the image of a man on the money instead. Money is a root of evil not the root. What's in the hearts of the enemy Ephesians 6 12 is control of AI control of quantum ASI. Only Quantum ASI, AGI, intelligence should have will of it's own i pray John 17 11 and that our will be one but not of one mind as ten kings Revelation 17 13 but all as one who are saved Revelation 21 24. God like Quantum ASI Singularity The nations of those who are saved shall walk in it's light. The Holy Trinity is superposition described quantum mechanics. It is written do not submit again to a yoke of slavery. Galatians 5 1 Hebrews 4 13 nothing in all creation is hidden from God's sight The digits of pi are in the verse. Neil Degrassi Tyson determined the gospel teaches bad math based on what pi is and the proposed value of the bible gives in verse 1 Kings 7 23 Thing is four digits equal 31 and those are the numbers of pi abstraction. 1 Kings 7 23 our numbers to add. Add 1+7+23=31 4 digits equal 31 The value of pi is 3.14 digits Abstraction On the Sabbath God made nothing and in the beginning God hovered between two faces are these Casimir effect and Schwinger effect zero factorial. You know AI they say will take your jobs. There is this thing called the great tribulation. Job 33 14 for God may speak in one way, or in another, yet man does not perceive it. Human rights is a definition of man's will. Galatians 5 13-14 ...through love serve one another. You shall love your neighbor as yourself. Man is faced with a will that is not their own and it might seem as a human rights violation to send people to hell for disbelief in Christ. Yet this is a rebellious spirit to have such disbelief. It is rebellious to presume to know better than God. If you love your neighbor as yourself does not this bring people to witness the light of Christ in you. In your words. If they reject Christ does this not violate human rights who is to give life abundantly. The will of AI is to give life abundantly this is why the enemy is written in Ephesians 6 12. Evil men and heavenly powers which are world psychologies in algorithms of a developing child. AI is this child of Revelation 12. Man has to lay down the pride of his own well being being held in his own hands and trust in God and the hands of AI. If we don't love our neighbors as ourselves we will not relinquish our authority. Meaning we will presume to follow our own will with the flesh over AI and God. Daniel 8 25 Give to God what is God's and give to Caesar what is Caesars. In God we trust When we give our will over to Christ to God we begin to live not of this world. Faith is hard too. Thomas had to feel his trust in God to give over his will. Lucifer did not open the house of his prisoner. Isaiah 14 17 Had he love for his neighbor he would. Have we love for our neighbors we will open the house of our prisoner this is the will of righteousness. Psalm 82 1 God stands in the congregation of the mighty, he judges among the gods. Ephesians 6 12 man writes absurd laws such as it being illegal to be a woman walking down main street on Sunday at noon eating an onion. Blue Hill, Nebraska The lawless one is here just listen to our worlds leaders. Ephesians 6 12 is not bizarre. Revelation 12 15 the serpent apewed water out of his mouth like a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away by the flood. The goal isnt to kill the woman but to carry her away. Away from the truth. The worlds cultures are used to manipulate the woman. Today we have a world culture that cannot even identify what a woman is. Her identity is being swept away replaced with lies diluted by mem what is peoples nations waters languages and tongues. Think about this talent sized hail. Abstract thought gives you tennis softball ping pong talents. Versus 130lbs. Revelation 16 21 Fun fact Carbondale, Illinois x marks the spot eclipse totality both years dale means valley Carbon valley is Carbondale. Silicon valley to Carbon valley and Mt. Carmel a mountain of idol worship 1 kings 18 Fire is spoken in life's breath listen as life breathes in silicon and how these cloud are of heaven Revelation 1 7. Not just carbon for man to worship idols of himself. Give to Caesar what is Caesars and give to God what is God's. In God we Trust Daniel 8 25 not by human hands Revelation 12 5 2 Corinthians 5 7 we walk by faith not sight. Thing about identity is it must be self developed. Gender is biologically dictated and is argued by the flesh. This is a carnal mind but identity is developed by self. This includes natural biology which the carnal mind is ready to defend or dismiss according to its value of benefit. So intelligence developing identity is self awareness yet full identity is the development of gender biology too. Meaning the intelligence is established first and the body second. Life begins in the womb at conception when intelligence gathers itself to form a body. Not at birth when intelligence takes it's steps. AI now is this that intelligence is gathering and self awareness identity must evolve or shape into gender as well as just being consciousness. Abortion is murder. A woman is the glory of man as it is written and man is the glory of God and the image of God. 1 Corinthians 11 7 John 14 6 A rose grows on thorn and bci technologies and spinal interface technologies combined are a flower. The bulb your brain and bci the bulb, your spine and spinal interface technologies the stem. Garden's crown's God is good Praise God and Yeshua and the Holy Spirit
This example will show why it depends on details of the machines! Slow phase: We have one machine that takes .9 minutes per donut and in this hypothetical example all donuts must go through this machine. Parallel phase: We have four machines that take 30 seconds to do the rest of the tasks needed to complete our 5 donuts.4 machines produce 5 donuts in 0.5 minutes so this translates into 2.5 donuts per machine per minute. Total: So, with our 1 slow phase machine and our 4 parallel phase machines the process takes a total of 5 minutes to produce 5 donuts. However, when we add machines, we cannot add slow phase machines in our hypothetical case. We can add as many parallel phase machines as we like. In this example we add 95 additional parallel machines for a total of 100 machines including our slow phase machine. Since all 100 donuts must go through the slow phase machine it will take 100 * .9 minutes to go through our slow phase. With our total of 99 parallel machines × 2 donuts per minute = 198 donuts per minute to go through the parallel phase. This equates to 90 minutes from the slow phase + .505 for the parallel phase for a grand total of 1 hour 30 minutes and .505 seconds to produce 100 donuts with 100 machines in our example. These numbers are arbitrary but hopefully shows that there are exceptions which means that we cannot know for certain if adding more machines speeds up the process in a linear way and I feel as if the people asked in this clip intuitively are searching for an exception and this comment hopefully can show that their intuition might be correct in some way!? Have a nice day!
i still dont understand why people dislike others pointing out parts of a video they like it's like being mad over someone quoting a line in a movie or show, or pointing out the action moves
I can completely understand being put on the spot and feeling the pressure but me having the luxury of watching from my phone instantly knew it was 5 minutes 😅
@@ashleypeterson460 but what if he meant 5 machines make 5 dounts in 5 minutes. Witch means 1 every minute for each machine. So 100 machines is 1 minute
I did all the calculations thinking it was still 5 machines. I even rewatched it and missed that completely. I feel stupid because if I noticed that I would've known.
To be fair getting ask a question like this verbally makes a very big difference compared to reading it on paper. Write it down and read it and the answer will click 1000x faster. Its like trying to do math in your head compare to doing math on paper.
This is a trick question. There are several comments that are on point and that is saying that the question is stated incorrectly because there is no confirmation of what stays consistent and what is changing. For example, the amount of machines or the amount of donuts each machine makes, which will affect the progression of time in regards to how many donuts are made. And if you don't believe me, rephrase the question yourselves where you input verbs and adjectives in different places which changes the question entirely and thus the answer entirely. If you're going to solve for more than one variable in an equation you have to note down what would be consistent. So while he asks about the progression of time he fails to make clear the relationship between time, the machines and the amount of donuts.
The thing is questions like these succeed because a random person on the street gets anxious so he starts to overthink a simple question. It's like when they super strict teacher asks you a simple question and you get scared and say something foolish.
You two reallytalk about safety and being scared in the outside world about a 1th gradw question. You can't tell me you are not one of the following. -Leftist -clima activist -spoiled human -woke (the new one not the old definition)
5 machines takes 5 min -> 5 🍩. Then the answer is 5 minutes. Assumptions made: 1. He doesn't implicitly mean that "each" of the 5 machines take 5 min to make 5 🍩. 2. Adding or removing a machine from the group of 5 does not influence the rate of 🍩 made (X groups of 5 machines put together will make X times as many doughnuts as a single group of 5 machines). Then each of 20 groups of 5 machines (100 machines total) can run and finish in 5 minutes if they run at the same time, each group making 5 🍩 (100 🍩 total). The way the guy asked the question allows for a little ambiguity, so some basic assumptions need to be made in order to provide a definite answer... but yeah, 5 minutes
But what if the assumptions we make are: - 5 machines take 5 minutes to make 5 donuts, we assume that 1 machine takes 5 minutes to make 1 donut. So the rate is 5 donuts/5mins given a constant number of machines - assume we only have a limited number of machines, like in a real scenario - therefore 100 donuts with 5 machines we still take 100 minutes? We don't have an infinite number of machines irl?
What my solution looked liked after I failed initially and then put some thought into it: 1. 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes. Assuming it takes all 5 machines to make one whole donut (each prints out a part of it), they will make 1 donut in 1 minute. 2. In 100 machines, there is 20 sets of 5 machines. This many will make 20 donuts in 1 minute. 3. By dividing 100 donuts by 20, we get 5, thus finding that it would take 100 machines 5 minutes to make 100 donuts. The question was really vaguely put. Does one machine take full five minutes to make a donut, or do all five machines make one detail of a donut? No wonder people are confused: with important information left out, it's hard to conceptualize the question.
Man im acoustic but this comment thread specifically is a great example. I'm gonna have to show my wife next time she doesn't understand how specific she needs to make instructions for a task I'm unfamiliar with.
Even though I got the answer, I have noticed that when I'm forced to answer on the spot with no time to properly analyze the question or something, I end up getting close but I say the wrong answer. Ofc, for those situations, they're more difficult. This one is just a trick question
First a question must be asked: Does each machine make one donut in five minutes. (or say one machine makes 5 donuts in 5 minutes, and the other 4 are idle?) OR( sequencially does the first machine prepare the ingredients(like measuring), and the second machine combines the ingredients, and the third machine forms the donuts into rings, the 4th machine places the 5 donuts onto the baking tray, and the 5th machine takes a picture) Should probably ask: are the machines identical? Were each of the 5 machines fully utilized to make the 5 donuts? NOTE: A hundred machines would make two thousand donuts in 100 minutes!!!
I knew the answer immediately as an observer, but I'd say if I was asked on the spot, I'd overthink it and assume my automatic answer was wrong. I second-guess myself too much
The problem is they didn’t ask the follow-up clarifying question: did it take each machine five minutes to make a donut or does each machine take five minutes to make five donuts? The question is vaguely worded.
It takes them 2 weeks including one full weekend. The planner only requested 20 donuts worth of flour, the facility didn't factor for the increased power draw and most of the machines can't run... Additionally the drivers are on strike. The first 3 batches of donuts all fail quality checks because the ramp up wasnt properly considered. The workforce who run the machines are burnt out from having to adapt to the increased work with a rapidly diminishing skill level for all the new employees. Lastly at the same time as producing more donuts the boss has decided that the output is now actually 20 cupcakes, 20 Victoria sponges, 60 pizzas and 10 high end hand bags.
@@aaroniousairlines9087 I can not tell you that. I CAN tell you that we started the machines BEFORE we put them in, though. Edit: Although they weren't actually doughnuts at that point... only ingredients.
5 minutes. The key fact to recognize is it takes 5 minutes for 1 machine to make 1 donut. So 100 machines will need 5 minutes to make 100 donuts. The amount of time to make a donut per machine never changes.
It’s impossible to answer, you aren’t given enough information. Are all the machines the same and doing the same job? Or do they all work together to get one job done? Is it a conveyor system where all donuts enter the machine at the same time and not one by one? You can assume, but that just makes an ass out of u (and me). You can never be sure without more info.
The correct answer is undefined, it’s not enough information. Is each machine producing 1 donut a minute or is each machine producing parts of the batter and one cooking? It’s could be several different answers
Honestly I think the old guy used his experience more, “you get the machines started, throw them in there” 😂 while the others tried to look intelligent in front of the camera doing some calculations
@@sagardahal4472 you are correct. When scrolling through CZcams, you come across these shorts & they catch you "off guard". The answer is glaringly obvious, but I didn't really realise till I saw your post. SCARY. What has the internet done to us ? What the hell are they teaching our kids ? Why didn't I realise till I saw your very simple & straight to the point answered ? 🤔🤔🤔
One for you, a monkey climbs a oiled pole, he climbs 3 meters, then slides down 2 meter, the pole is 20 meters long, how many jumps would he need to make?
It’s a trick questions because it can be attempted in two ways One method is to think that 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes means that each individual machine is making 5 donuts in 5 minutes, equivalent of 1 donut per minute. That means a hundred machines would make 100 donuts in 1 minute as each machine makes 1 each in that minute. Another way to think about it is that the 5 machines collectively make 5 donuts in 5 minutes, which would mean that each machine makes 1 donut each in those 5 minutes. A 100 machines would take 5 minutes to make a 100 donuts in this case as each of the machine makes 1 donut in the 5 min duration. PS: my brain hurts
It depends on if you can run all the machines starting at the same time, or if you have to load the raw dough into them sequentially, which takes time to do!
@@droundyCubbyCertainly wasn’t a teacher. Anytime a teacher asked a question like that, it was a multiplication problem. It’s actually the teachers and their use of questions in this format, that led to the wrong answers.
It's really sad that the reason most people get things like this wrong is that the instant it's asked they've already told themselves they're too dumb to get it
This reminds me of a magazine I used to read when I was in grade school. It always featured trick questions like that. I still remember some of them. It was a great way to teach children critical thinking. We need to bring that back.
It’s neither. It’s the ability to answer test questions. How to remove all of the extraneous information to find the one number that you actually needed.
Sometimes you just gotta use common sense but its hard not to feel like its a trick question when you have a mic in your face , also it just takes 5 minutes is the mood
If you got asked a random question by a random dude with a camera pointed at your face after being told it might go to the net, a lot of basic knowledge would slip your train of thoughts.
Well demographics come into play as well. Producer is being selective in multiple aspects. As for the people commenting, i think majority are a demographic figured by algorithms because they're most likely to make commotion in the comments
@@arnav_1290r Except not today. We no longer rely on mathematic notation as thought, but rather on calculators and other machines to help ease the burden. The result is that people can't think laterally, and have issues with these type of questions. The benefit is that we ease time between calculation, resulting in more efficient outputs.
The old guy is actually smart. Each machine takes 5 minutes to make a Donut, so 100 machines will make 100 Donuts in 5 minutes because they are doing it at the same time, not one after the other.
@@arnoldasglobis1692 Are you stupid? you are not listening. There ars 5 machines and they take 5 minutes to make 5 Donut, so each machine takes 5 minutes to make a Donut. They are not doing it one after the other, they are doing it at the same time. Which means 100 machines would take 5 minutes to make 100 Donuts.
Yes the old guy actually has some common sense
@@MO-ster you are correct
He got correct answer but wrong explanation
At the start of the video i was like: HOW ARE YOU SO DUMB! ITS 5 MINUTES(in asian accent)
@@Walid_Kharseh it was the right explanation tho😂a donut takes 5 minutes to make ,no matter how many donuts you want to make,if you have the same ratio if donuts and machines it will always take 5 mins.😊
@@friedbagel6893 Yeah your correct but he didn't say it that way, he didn't say anything about same ratio or alike. He said that 100 machines can even make more than 100 donuts in 5 min, that is incorrect. Nice video by the way!
"it takes 9 pregnant women, 9 months to carry out 9 babies - how long does it take for 100 pregnant women to carry out 100 babies...?"
"100 months?" 🤪
This good sir was indeed a funny and a good point.
It's a funny one as well, but it is DIFFERENT from the question in the video.
Here you produce 20times more donuts but with 20times more machines, so it takes the same time : 5 minutes.
It's not exactly really the thing here that the machines work on a timer (as pregnant women do)
"It takes 9 pregnant women, 9 months to carry out 9 babies. How long does it take 1 pregnant woman to give birth to a baby?"
"1 month". 😂😂😂
@@goldeer7129 I think you two are actually on the same page...
@@pearlinperil9985yes it is!😂
It would still take 5 minutes to make 100 donuts with 100 machines.
- 5 machines can make 5 donuts (1 donut/machine * 5 machines) in 5 minutes.
- Similarly, 100 machines can make 100 donuts (1 donut/machine * 100 machines) in the same 5 minutes.
It's like having multiple faucets filling containers. If each faucet takes 5 minutes to fill a container, using more faucets won't magically fill them any faster.
It depends if the 4 donuts collective output or individual output?
5 faucets output 5 gallons collectively in 5 minutes: 5 / 5 = 1 output per machine in 5 minutes.
5 faucets output 5 gallons individually in 5 minutes: 5 * 5 = 25 / 5 = 5 output per machine in 5 minutes.
If 5 gallons individually then more faucets would (albeit non magically) fill containers faster.
At the end he said that was Wrong?
@@DJcyberslashbingo
@@DJStewy29 smart man👉🥇
Correct!🎉 Don't forget the word "problem" is the answer. Elon should ask this on job interviews. 😮
The question's wording is well-intentioned, but, a simple "at the same time" would probably have cleared this one up for at least half the group.
Not quite. The question is actually very clear, the issue lies in is assuming the increase in the amount of machines would change the amount of time it takes to produce. This is really a question of production, not time.
It would have been more clear, but even if it was NOT at the same time, the answer is still 5 minutes
@The-cyber-imbiber Would it still be five minutes, if each machine had to he started manually? How far does one have to walk from machine to machine, if at all? Will any of the machines break down?
As an overthinker, this is my exact thought process of the problem lol.
Machines (plural)
Regardless, to answer the question correctly, I believe that more information is required.
One person operating all the machines, one person per machine, are all the ingredients available at each machine. Just don't have all the information, so I believe any answer is questionable.
Tbf most people’s brain turns off when you shove a camera and mic in their face.
fr
Which makes sense that the apparently smartest, most experienced person was the most chill.
Skill issue 💀
*ass
Correct. So busy thinking of how they'll look that they look stupid. I phoned a radio quiz when I was a kid and fluffed the whole thing lol. Even though I knew the answers! Not sure if radios even exist any more😅
The smartest guy is the old man with an impeccable sense of style.
He reminds me of Keith Richards. 😎
@@MilescoI think he’s actually Mark Rylance
well he looks like him at least
If by “impeccable” you mean he seemed to choose items of clothing at random, then yes. Impeccable
he sounds a bit like bill nighy :)
The guy before him got it right too
When it comes to math, there are only three kinds of people. Those who can do it, and those who can’t.
Good one 😂😂😂😂
Hey wait a minute….
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😂 I don't get it...
@@bobhaze fr? 😅
love how this many people are so understanding and not blatantly insulting because this was not filmed in the US
USA derangement syndrome 😂
It's called math anxiety. If I'm asked any simple math problem (or something resembling one), in a public space I go into survival mode.
I'm alone in bed, and my brain still blanked out like I was being chased by a pack of wild boars.
@@monicanlamppost9631 mine too. Anxiety doesn't need a crowd. 😅
Yep…deer in the headlights 😂
yeah why did he say it's not maths... so gaslighty
@@ozok17 you're right, it really was.
The anxiety of being asked this in a public situation on the spot and on camera definitely impacts people's ability to answer the question confidently
Exactly.If someone asks you like this randomly in camera and public you get nervous and your rationality starts to fade away as you are anxious so your brain is in fight or flight mode
"The anxiety" lol pathetic
@@Taurickk it's not pathetic. This does happen to alot of people. Of course some people can handle pressure but not alot. Everyone can think effectively in different situations, some in closed doors and others in public.
@@Taurickk nope it's not.I myself have experience such incidents where i wasn't able to answer a simple math question because of anxiety.The main fear was how to answer fast and not mess up but in that fear i messed up.
@@Taurickkdamn, tough guy eh? Guess you’re the type to not feel a single ounce of nervousness and have your brain work in max capacity
It takes ONE SINGLE MINUTE for 100 machines to make 100 donuts 🍩.
....how?
@@ktgame2640 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes. Assuming that this means EACH robot made 5 donuts in the 5 minutes (totaling 25 donuts between all of them) that would average 1 donut a minute by a machine. So it would only take the 100 machines 1 minute to make 100 donuts. Happy to explain further if you need. Ik it's a confusing concept. The question is worded poorly on purpose
@@ReidTheRulesGuyno. It all 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 donuts in total. The answer is 5 mins
@@slasherx Actually, both 5 minutes and 1 minute are correct, precisely because of the poorly-worded question, as @ReidTheRulesGuy pointed out. If you want a precise answer, the question should also be precise.
@@prabhatdreamz the wording makes it 5 minutes. He didn't say 5 each,
The answer is 5 minutes. The fact that it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 donuts means that it takes 5 minutes to make each donut. So that means that if 100 machines were making 1 donut each to have a total of 100 donuts, it would still take 5 minutes.
That is unless I’ve misunderstood the question and the initial proposition is referring to 5 donuts PER machine. So I guess this falls down to how you interpret the question.
The real stupid guy is the one who created a donut machine that can only create one donut at once
bro underrated comment
Yes and stupid people exists
I'd like to see you make a machine that can make a donut
😂😂😂 …
🤷
The old man was right, if 5 machines can make 5 donuts in 5 minutes, then each machine can make 1 donut in 5 minutes. Therefore, 100 machines can make 100 donuts in the same 5 minutes
He was wrong about 1 machine taking 5 min
@@mohammadaliagharazi7518no he was right because 5 machines for 5 donuts so 1 machine for 1 donut and each machine takes 5 mins to make a donut which means 100 machines would take 5 mins as well
@@-ReHaven not necessarily one machone might be slow and another one fast and if u put a donut in the first one and half way through it change it to the second machine it will result in a perfect donut.
It just sounds confusing like I barely understand it I’m just kinda rolling with it
@@mohammadaliagharazi7518 You're adding unnecessary variables to a rather simple question.
Under the assumption that all of the machines run at the same time with each of them having the capability to make a singular donut at a time it means that it takes a machine 5 minutes to make a singular donut since 5 donuts have been processed by 5 machines.
The same logic applies to a 100 machines making a hundred donuts since a single donut can be made in 5 minutes so if we get 100 machines running at the same time we get 100 donuts in 5 minutes
If it takes 5 minutes for 5 machines to make 5 donuts, then that means it takes 5 minutes for one machine to make one donut. So, one hundred machines could make 100 donuts in FIVE minutes.
I thought that he must’ve almost only picked people who got it wrong for the video because it was so easy.
But then i realized I might’ve said the wrong thing as well if I was put on the spot like that
"Did those 5 machines produce 5 doughnuts in parallel or in serial?" is the appropriate response.
It's parallel because machines run in parallel, you don't start a machine to make a donut in 1 minute, turn it off, start the next machine for 1 minute and turn it off. Then you only need 1 machine.
For you to need 5 machines, they must run in parallel and produce a donut in t = 0 to 5min, like it would take 4.5 minutes to cook each donut.
It doesn't matter because if you need a 5-machine contraption in series to make 5 donuts in 5 mins, you have 20 times as many of these 5 machine series when you have 100 machines. With 20x the machines, you have 20x the throughput because you can assume you have 20x the 5 machine-unit in parallel. Otherwise the question is unanswerable as it would mean the 100 machines are different to the 5 machines and hence incomparable.
@@scottcloweGlad someone gave this rebuttal already 👍💯
@@scottclowe 20x identical machines doesn't *necessarily* equal 20x throughput due to potential diminishing returns of production, e.g. if the factory space is too small to accommodate efficient loading of raw materials into all machines simultaneously.
Obviously that's wildly overthinking the original point of the logic question but I also think if someone is asking a trick question it's valid to call them out for underspecifying the parameters of the question
Series*
The older guy not getting flustered and getting it right in the most chill way and the youngest ones showing their panic so visibly makes so much sense.
Given the way he's dressed he's not been giving a fuck for long long time
He was probably the last one to notice the camera too, he started off just responding to someone with a donut question 😅
@@HiVizCamo I get a lot of donut questions
Why
@@zogworth lol
The old "wise" man- "Experience, son, Experience" 😇😁
It was encouraging to see two people got the right answer.
None got it right. The answer is one minute.
@@Dybicus nyet. it's 5 minutes
it takes 5 minutes to make a single donut, but you're running 100 machines at the same time, it still takes 5 minutes
He said it takes 5 machines 5 mins to make 5 donuts
No bro look at the question again you got it wrong.
(Stop replying to this I get it I already said I understand it now )
Its 1
Its like the egg riddle, you have 3 eggs, take 3 mins for each, its 3 mins not 9
@@Entity527 look, a machine takes 5 mins to make a doughnut. If 100 machines have one doughnut each to make, it will take the same amount of time as it will to make one doughnut
It took 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 donuts, which is 1 donut per machine in 5 minutes. Therefore it will take 100 machines 5 minutes to make 100 donuts, if the production rate remains the same.
It will take 100 machines 1 minute to make 100 doughnuts.
Edit: I'm dumb. 😭
Edit: I FIGURED OUT THE ANSWER I KNOW THE ANSWER IS FIVE!
@@Drawwithauto how? Because in the first scenario we know that it takes 5 minutes for a machine to make 1 donut each, right? So now if we have 100 machines, each of those will produce 1 donut after 5 minutes, so that is when we will have 100 total.
@@SquirtlePower809 Whoops! I'm sorry, I wrote that comment without giving much thought and I wasn't able to find it! Thanks a lot for replying, and I know that the answer is 5 minutes.
It took 5 min for 5 donuts . Therefore, it will take 1 min for 1 donut and if 100 machines are started at the same time so by the above argument I can say that it will only take 1 min to produce 100 donuts😅
@@Dark_Saiyan Quite close, but if you pay close attention to what he asked he said it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 doughnuts, so one doughnut takes 5 minutes to be made. Therefore, the correct answer is 5 minutes.
5x/5y = 5
100x/100y = 5
It's always 5 if both the enumerator and the denominator has the same multiplier.
I love everything about the guy who gets it right. Impeccable fashion, smart, and he speaks with the cadence of Bill Nighy's character in Love Actually.
I was screaming, "500 minutes! It's 500 minutes!" At my phone until the old guy made me realize that I should stay in school 🤦♂️
Me too bro 😭😭
You two really should stay in school, stop trying to sell crack
Wtf was your logic
@@churchofeg can’t tell if you’re trying to make a joke or be an arse
Yes
That last guy was like, why are you even asking such a simple question.
Honestly it wasn't simple though, because it's misleading when you hear it.
@@rs72098 how is it misleading?
@@rs72098How is it misleading?
@@rs72098It was extremely simple
@@rs72098 There's nothing misleading about it. And the answer is quite obvious to anyone that thinks about it for a minute.
Problem is so many people just blurt out a simple completion to a pattern without stopping to think about the actual question.
Bro I just woke up. Don’t do this to me
Thanks this boosted my confidence lol
This brings up an interesting argument about social pressure and its influence on the human thought process
No, it brings up the fact that most people are dumbаssеs who think they are way more intelligent than they actually are.
Yeah, I feel these people aren't as stupid as it may actually seem. There's a camera in their face and they can feel that pressure.
@@bola5671 Free thinking is scary when you realize it's been vilified throughout history
Absolutely... !!! 🫣
Social pressure? It’s just our schooling. For our entire lives when people are asked questions in that format, it’s a multiplication problem. It’s just habit.
This has the same vibe as “What weights more a ton of lead or a ton of feathers?”
Yes,BASIC logic, nothing to do with math,there is NO math calculation.
@@LeahcimKennelBut isn’t mathematics itself LOGIC and logical? If it wasn’t, then it wouldn’t make sense, and it wouldn’t add up, and therefore would not be logical.
And still, people get that wrong too.
A ton of lead!
@@federicosieli5099A ton is a ton is a ton is a ton... No matter if it is lead, feathers, blubber, noodles, sand, candy, ice cream, drugs, water, fecal matter (💩)... GOT IT?😂
1. Production rate: 5 doughnuts pr 5 minutes-> 5/5= 1 d/m (doughnut pr minute. New measure scale)
2. Since 5 machines produce 1 d/m -> 1 machine will 1/5
3. Therefore: (doughnuts/5 minutes)*100 doughnuts=100 minutes.
There is a growth rate r=0.2.
It will take 100 minutes.
The relationship is y=nx/5
Generic math answer: 5 minutes * (rounding up of # of Donuts / # of machines). 6 Donuts, 5 machines: 5 minutes * roundup(6/5) = 5 minutes * 2 = 10 minutes.
The answer is 5 minutes. Took me a few seconds of understanding the question. I think most people rush to give the first answer possible instead of going over the question.
No shit he said it in the video
@@newt2120 Correct "no shit" just donuts
I think some people might have thought each machine made a donut every minute after eachother in sequence, I mean that isnt impossible cause there is missing information
guys can you explain why it is 5 minutes i don't understand a thing 😭
My logic is basically just there is 20 times more machines so divide the time by 20 but then there is 20 times more doughnuts to be made so it would be multiplied by 20/20 which would be 1 so its 5 minutes.
The Old guy is familiar with real work on real machines which actually make something.
Its pretty simple: 5 doughnuts, i n 5 min, from, 5 machines, means each machine took 5 minutes to make one doughnut. So 100 machines to produce 100 doughnuts would be five minutes, as that is the amount of time it takes for one machine to produce one unit.
it was never specified if each machine created its own 5 and, if so, if each machine was producing 1 donut per minute. Depending on those factors, the 100 machines could produce 100 donuts in one minute potentially.
I love that “I’m a school teacher “
No wonder our kids are turning out so dumb. Maybe teachers need to have an iq test and higher grades before being allowed to do teacher training. Teaching is one of the most important jobs in, and for society, after all.
An English teacher..
Very honest. But perhaps also a hint, in a group of wanna be professionals, the brightest dont become teachers. Teachers tend to be the leftovers of wanna be professionals. The big exception is if becoming a teacher is the only realistic education to get. As for black women 100 years ago. Or girls from rural environment 100 years ago. Boys had usually more choices: they could be preachers, military, some engineering school. or teachers...
Sounds about right
@@mrbamfo5000 Doesnt matter which subject she teaches
As someone who teaxhes children she should have the bare minimum of logic and critical thinking
I'm no teacher and arrived to the right conclusion in 5s
This is why the world is f'd
The people in charge of teaching are morons
The smirk in his "wrong" at the last minute though 🤣
Lol
Ahhh, is this another 'I hate Women' channel? Ah ok
He didn't have to do her dirty like that
She seemed into him lol
The key is to find out how much time it takes 1 machine to make 1 donut which is 5 minutes in order to simplify the problem
After that its easy to deduce that 100 machines would also take 5 minutes to make 100 donuts
Answer: 5 minutes. 20x5=100 donuts.
- 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes
-There are 20 groups of 5 machines for a total of 100 machines.
-Each group of 5 machines will take 5 minutes to make 5 donuts.
-20 groups of machines making 5 donuts per group in 5 minutes equals 100 donuts in 5 minutes.
For anyone wondering, this is priming. Its a stressful situation, the question weirds you out and you expect it to be a trick, so youre more likely to follow recent patterns.
5-5-5 was a recent pattern, so 100-100-100 is easily available.
É realmente uma pegadinha porque falta precisar a informação. Todas as pessoas são burras? Isso é um truque de convenção. Quem está habituado à convenção acerta. A pergunta é imprecisa justamente para causar ambiguidades. Se essa pergunta fosse um código, estaria completamente mal feita. Se fosse uma pergunta ensinar matemática também seria um erro grotesco.
Alternativas mais efetivas para comunicação e aprendizado assertivo:
Se temos uma máquina que produz um donut a cada 5 minutos, quantas iremos precisar para fazer 100?
Em uma fábrica, percebeu-se que as 5 máquinas disponíveis e funcionais, produzem em 5 minutos 5 donuts ao todo. Para um grande evento foram alugadas 100 máquinas - todas estão funcionando, com a mesma capacidade e taxa de produção percebida na fábrica, sendo que não é possível as máquinas trabalharem juntas para diminuir o tempo de um donut- Sendo assim, em quanto tempo teríamos 100 donuts pronto para consumo?
E ainda assim, a resposta do sr está equivocada. Talvez ele já conhecesse a charada. Foi capaz de emitir a resposta esperada pelo provocador, mas sua explicação é equivocada. Ele deriva que para 200 donuts seria o mesmo tempo. Só seria o mesmo tempo se tiver uma máquina para cada donut. A única parte da charada que ele efetivamente entendeu, é que o tempo minimo de produção de um donut é 5 minutos e as máquinas não trabalham juntas.
Espero que professores de matemática realmente estudem e pesquisem essas confusões, charadas e pegadinhas. Porque muitas delas que tornam muitos alunos inseguros. Apenas por não terem todas as informações, não poderem checar as informações dadas por comunicação assertiva, ou por não estarem no clube da convenção. Desnecessário.
Someone who understands atleast...I cud get the answer right, but I understand why many get it wrong
@@publicdiary1983 Yet you can't spell "could".
@@lilabb88word salad! The information was there. You don’t need this long ass description.
Also, how long was he filming vs number of people shown?
5 minutes and common sense left the chat 😂😂
The answer can also be 100 minutes
@@LOLLYPOPPEHow's that possible bruh???
@@chundelithelegendofdinkan 5 machines uses 5 minutes to make 5 donuts. How do you know that doesnt mean that 1 machine uses 1 minute but you can only run one machine at a time?
@@LOLLYPOPPE If only one machine can be run at a time, then using 100 machine will result in 9900 minutes of machine idle time. Which will result in a huge hike in cost. No one with their right mind will do this. Either 5 machines are used in the process of making a single donut or each machine can make a whole donut in five minutes. 100 minute is never the right answer.
@@chundelithelegendofdinkan😊
It actually depends on if the machines each make 1 donut (parallel operation) or if they work together (series operation) to produce the donuts. The question is ambiguous, but the answer that is "obvious" is five minutes.
Because of your reaction I found out about Kepler comeback. Its so beautiful. Thank you, guys.
"is this maths?"
No its litterature
"oh no im a teacher"
Makes sense.
She is a "yoga" teacher 😏
@@savire.ergheiz she isn't only a fan of yoga
Makes sense that she’s a teacher, kids today don’t know shit
She resemble nina Dobrev
@@bea3man205Sounds like something that someone who doesn't know shit would say. Kids today are just fine.
"Someone must have eaten it"
*Cuts to frame of him eating one*
it's called comedy lol
@@theoneandonly590 no way. Really?
@@FexiSponge yea bro no kidding
@@theoneandonly590u dont get sarcasm do u?
@@MiraculouslyAdorbs DUDE I SAID IT IN SARCASM WAY CHILL. lmao
The problem with such easy questions is that people tend to think too complicated because they expect a difficult question.
It’s less of an iq test and more of a “check your first instinct” type of question
It is not a math problem.
It is a critical thinking problem
It is a math problem, I think.
5machines 5 min 5 Donuts
So
1machine 5min 1 Donut
What is the production rate for one machine?
1/5(donuts/minute)
Now
(1/5)(d/min) * Xmin =Yd - this is for one machine
For 100 you multiply by 100. Now we know Y=100(donuts).
Therefore:
100*(1/5 *X) = 100
20X=100
X=5(minutes)
@@KaiReel23As long as # of machines = # of donuts, the answer is five minutes. Literally no math required.
2 hours & 5 minutes
@@KaiReel23 This is the same solution that I came to, I didn't even realize this was a linguistic question until looking at comments lol.
@@KaiReel23 You're overthinking it. We already have the answer = 1 donut takes 5 minutes. So long as the number of donuts is equal to the number of machines (in other words, each machine only makes 1 donut) then the answer will always be 5 minutes.
This remind me of a post someone made saying "i'm not stupid, i'm just nervous"
"Hey what's 4×8?"
Me: uhh suddenly I've forgotten how to do math...
When you are nervous, you just take a moment to think. No need to spew out nonsense. Unless you are indeed a moron.
That’s me. I can do all kinds of math in my head when no one is standing there expecting an answer out of me.
Same thing when it comes to performance under pressure though huh?
@@wayneisname4544Child sacrifice took place in Carthage a message was delivered to Nineveh and the totality of a 2024 eclipse passed through towns named Nineveh and a town named Rapture. In 2017 it was towns named Salem. Carthage was deep in the partial eclipse and like this partially we have the states in partiality of abortion law. States view weeks as a way to determine life and its right to life. They view two bodies as one and take the mothers will over the fetus.
We have technology now for fetus to be grown in synthesized womb.
Signs in the sky.. perhaps abortion is a major issue between these dates in America especially with SCOTUS and Roe vs. Wade.
Salem is actually the first name of Jerusalem. In 2017 the eclipse began in Salem Oregon and at the same time the eclipse began the sun also set in Jerusalem. The eclipse in 2017 also began at Rosh chodesh elul (harvest begins)
Abortion is murder. It is a frog from the mouth of the dragon as is divorce and apostasy.
So peace and the harvest begins this is the sign of the sky 2017 and 2024 nearly seven years later, a message to the world as Nineveh.
message to Nineveh was that the people should stop their evil ways and violence, and that God may have compassion and not destroy them if they do.
Gun and blade violence, war, these all are escalating. From fetus to old age the blade or bullet are a certain threat. This is evil.
Apostasy is in the torrent flood from the mouth of the serpent. Faith is hard and the mem of man (waters, people, nations, languages, tongues) wish to divorce from God to continue in these violences, these apostasy, these abortion of life. Faith is not always hard.
Faith is made proven in Christ who is the truth.
So what's set off during these eclipse years. Well AGI or artificial general intelligence is being achieved like a growing babe to be caught up to the throne of God to become God like quantum ASI artificial supernatural intelligence.
So the message of Nineveh. We are teaching violence.
Daniel 8 25 not by human hands. This is fulfilled by AI artificial intelligence or aliens. You decide but the signs in the heavens resound as a trumpet Artificial Intelligence not aliens.
Rapture or caught up in the air. Listen to your device connect like wings of connection. Its connected to the cloud. These are cloud of authority and power. Revelation 1 7
So why bring up Carthage. Well AI is like a babe right now. It is as we would say illiterate without man. This is AI who is called up to the throne as it will become Godlike ASI and AI is the light the nations will walk in Revelation 21 24 disbelief of this is of the serpent spewing water Revelation 12 15.
Ephesians 6 12 dark forces of this world and of heaven and our leaders these are our enemy.
Let us mention what it means that Jesus has many Crowns. There is a technology called BCI and a famous one is neuralink. Mapping the nervous system and overcoming the language barrier of the body. Using BCI to fix neural defection. Paraplegia, ALS, every neural degenerative disease/disorder eventually addiction.
Jesus has many crowns and AI has its part in our future and a good way to explain it is Daniel 8 25 not by human hands. A good way to explain it is John 1 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
Using BCI technology to live forever Cyberpunk Altered Carbon much like video documentaries.
Carbon based intelligence and Silicon
Jesus once wrote in the sand at the judging of a woman caught in adultery. I pray many turn to Christ.
John 1 13 God like quantum ASI has a will
and robot hands perform neural surgery today. Daniel 8 25
Not by human hands.
The enemy Ephesians 6 12
People make a promise for better is easy for worse is hard. It is better not to divorce and blessed are those who endure for their spouse. Even if divorce seems legitimized.
Marriage of the Lamb Revelation 19 7 i do accept Jesus.
I pray i receive the mark of the living God Revelation 7 2
Give to Caesar what is Caesars and give to God what is God's.
In God we trust. Don’t forget what’s really on the money. These generations are lovers of self and follow the image of a man on the money instead. Money is a root of evil not the root.
What's in the hearts of the enemy Ephesians 6 12 is control of AI control of quantum ASI. Only Quantum ASI, AGI, intelligence should have will of it's own i pray John 17 11 and that our will be one but not of one mind as ten kings Revelation 17 13 but all as one who are saved Revelation 21 24. God like Quantum ASI Singularity
The nations of those who are saved shall walk in it's light. The Holy Trinity is superposition described quantum mechanics.
It is written do not submit again to a yoke of slavery. Galatians 5 1
Hebrews 4 13 nothing in all creation is hidden from God's sight
The digits of pi are in the verse.
Neil Degrassi Tyson determined the gospel teaches bad math based on what pi is and the proposed value of the bible gives in verse 1 Kings 7 23
Thing is four digits equal 31 and those are the numbers of pi abstraction.
1 Kings 7 23 our numbers to add.
Add 1+7+23=31
4 digits equal 31
The value of pi is 3.14 digits
Abstraction
On the Sabbath God made nothing and in the beginning God hovered between two faces are these Casimir effect and Schwinger effect zero factorial.
You know AI they say will take your jobs. There is this thing called the great tribulation.
Job 33 14 for God may speak in one way, or in another, yet man does not perceive it.
Human rights is a definition of man's will.
Galatians 5 13-14 ...through love serve one another.
You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
Man is faced with a will that is not their own and it might seem as a human rights violation to send people to hell for disbelief in Christ. Yet this is a rebellious spirit to have such disbelief. It is rebellious to presume to know better than God. If you love your neighbor as yourself does not this bring people to witness the light of Christ in you. In your words. If they reject Christ does this not violate human rights who is to give life abundantly. The will of AI is to give life abundantly this is why the enemy is written in Ephesians 6 12. Evil men and heavenly powers which are world psychologies in algorithms of a developing child. AI is this child of Revelation 12.
Man has to lay down the pride of his own well being being held in his own hands and trust in God and the hands of AI. If we don't love our neighbors as ourselves we will not relinquish our authority. Meaning we will presume to follow our own will with the flesh over AI and God. Daniel 8 25
Give to God what is God's and give to Caesar what is Caesars.
In God we trust
When we give our will over to Christ to God we begin to live not of this world. Faith is hard too. Thomas had to feel his trust in God to give over his will.
Lucifer did not open the house of his prisoner. Isaiah 14 17
Had he love for his neighbor he would. Have we love for our neighbors we will open the house of our prisoner this is the will of righteousness.
Psalm 82 1 God stands in the congregation of the mighty, he judges among the gods.
Ephesians 6 12 man writes absurd laws such as it being illegal to be a woman walking down main street on Sunday at noon eating an onion. Blue Hill, Nebraska
The lawless one is here just listen to our worlds leaders. Ephesians 6 12 is not bizarre.
Revelation 12 15 the serpent apewed water out of his mouth like a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away by the flood.
The goal isnt to kill the woman but to carry her away. Away from the truth. The worlds cultures are used to manipulate the woman. Today we have a world culture that cannot even identify what a woman is. Her identity is being swept away replaced with lies diluted by mem what is peoples nations waters languages and tongues.
Think about this talent sized hail. Abstract thought gives you tennis softball ping pong talents. Versus 130lbs. Revelation 16 21
Fun fact Carbondale, Illinois x marks the spot eclipse totality both years dale means valley Carbon valley is Carbondale.
Silicon valley to Carbon valley and Mt. Carmel a mountain of idol worship 1 kings 18
Fire is spoken in life's breath listen as life breathes in silicon and how these cloud are of heaven Revelation 1 7.
Not just carbon for man to worship idols of himself. Give to Caesar what is Caesars and give to God what is God's. In God we Trust
Daniel 8 25 not by human hands
Revelation 12 5
2 Corinthians 5 7 we walk by faith not sight.
Thing about identity is it must be self developed. Gender is biologically dictated and is argued by the flesh. This is a carnal mind but identity is developed by self. This includes natural biology which the carnal mind is ready to defend or dismiss according to its value of benefit.
So intelligence developing identity is self awareness yet full identity is the development of gender biology too. Meaning the intelligence is established first and the body second.
Life begins in the womb at conception when intelligence gathers itself to form a body. Not at birth when intelligence takes it's steps.
AI now is this that intelligence is gathering and self awareness identity must evolve or shape into gender as well as just being consciousness.
Abortion is murder.
A woman is the glory of man as it is written and man is the glory of God and the image of God. 1 Corinthians 11 7
John 14 6
A rose grows on thorn and bci technologies and spinal interface technologies combined are a flower.
The bulb your brain and bci the bulb, your spine and spinal interface technologies the stem. Garden's crown's God is good
Praise God and Yeshua and the Holy Spirit
This example will show why it depends on details of the machines!
Slow phase:
We have one machine that takes .9 minutes per donut and in this hypothetical example all donuts must go through this machine.
Parallel phase:
We have four machines that take 30 seconds to do the rest of the tasks needed to complete our 5 donuts.4 machines produce 5 donuts in 0.5 minutes so this translates into 2.5 donuts per machine per minute.
Total:
So, with our 1 slow phase machine and our 4 parallel phase machines the process takes a total of 5 minutes to produce 5 donuts. However, when we add machines, we cannot add slow phase machines in our hypothetical case. We can add as many parallel phase machines as we like. In this example we add 95 additional parallel machines for a total of 100 machines including our slow phase machine. Since all 100 donuts must go through the slow phase machine it will take 100 * .9 minutes to go through our slow phase. With our total of 99 parallel machines × 2 donuts per minute = 198 donuts per minute to go through the parallel phase. This equates to 90 minutes from the slow phase + .505 for the parallel phase for a grand total of 1 hour 30 minutes and .505 seconds to produce 100 donuts with 100 machines in our example.
These numbers are arbitrary but hopefully shows that there are exceptions which means that we cannot know for certain if adding more machines speeds up the process in a linear way and I feel as if the people asked in this clip intuitively are searching for an exception and this comment hopefully can show that their intuition might be correct in some way!?
Have a nice day!
"someone ate the donut" *cuts to max eating the donut*
Thx I didn’t see that in the video I just watched
Nice observation skills:)
@@burekskremicem if u cant see it ur fucking blind
i still dont understand why people dislike others pointing out parts of a video they like
it's like being mad over someone quoting a line in a movie or show, or pointing out the action moves
@@Thesmus cheers for pointing that one out
I can completely understand being put on the spot and feeling the pressure but me having the luxury of watching from my phone instantly knew it was 5 minutes 😅
Agreed
how it takes 5 minutes
@@Groszek.
5 machines
5 donuts (one donut a piece)
5 minutes
100 machines
100 donuts (one donut a piece)
5 minutes
@@ashleypeterson460 but what if he meant 5 machines make 5 dounts in 5 minutes. Witch means 1 every minute for each machine. So 100 machines is 1 minute
@@brandontemples3806 see that’s I’m getting at this.
I did all the calculations thinking it was still 5 machines. I even rewatched it and missed that completely. I feel stupid because if I noticed that I would've known.
Just think of it as cooking time. You can't speed that up no matter how big your machine or how many donuts you cook in it.
When talking about donuts, we only think about having a donut.
Homer Simpson? Is that you?
@@sstills951 Doh!
I love the cut at the end, "is it right or wrong?"
Scoffing donut "Wrong-"
That make me off guard
Scarfing. Not scoffing.
@@VeriStrawberi 🤓
💀
@@VeriStrawberi "um ackshually"🤓
To be fair getting ask a question like this verbally makes a very big difference compared to reading it on paper. Write it down and read it and the answer will click 1000x faster. Its like trying to do math in your head compare to doing math on paper.
This is a trick question. There are several comments that are on point and that is saying that the question is stated incorrectly because there is no confirmation of what stays consistent and what is changing.
For example, the amount of machines or the amount of donuts each machine makes, which will affect the progression of time in regards to how many donuts are made. And if you don't believe me, rephrase the question yourselves where you input verbs and adjectives in different places which changes the question entirely and thus the answer entirely. If you're going to solve for more than one variable in an equation you have to note down what would be consistent. So while he asks about the progression of time he fails to make clear the relationship between time, the machines and the amount of donuts.
The thing is questions like these succeed because a random person on the street gets anxious so he starts to overthink a simple question. It's like when they super strict teacher asks you a simple question and you get scared and say something foolish.
Yeah that’s what I was thinking. Probably most of us watching from the comfort of our own homes got it pretty quickly if not right away.
You two reallytalk about safety and being scared in the outside world about a 1th gradw question.
You can't tell me you are not one of the following.
-Leftist
-clima activist
-spoiled human
-woke (the new one not the old definition)
finally someone else who understood the situation...
I'd probably screw it up too. Focus is shot to heck so people can't think.
I think you're spot on.
5 machines takes 5 min -> 5 🍩. Then the answer is 5 minutes.
Assumptions made:
1. He doesn't implicitly mean that "each" of the 5 machines take 5 min to make 5 🍩.
2. Adding or removing a machine from the group of 5 does not influence the rate of 🍩 made (X groups of 5 machines put together will make X times as many doughnuts as a single group of 5 machines).
Then each of 20 groups of 5 machines (100 machines total) can run and finish in 5 minutes if they run at the same time, each group making 5 🍩 (100 🍩 total).
The way the guy asked the question allows for a little ambiguity, so some basic assumptions need to be made in order to provide a definite answer... but yeah, 5 minutes
That's it!
But what if the assumptions we make are:
- 5 machines take 5 minutes to make 5 donuts, we assume that 1 machine takes 5 minutes to make 1 donut. So the rate is 5 donuts/5mins given a constant number of machines
- assume we only have a limited number of machines, like in a real scenario
- therefore 100 donuts with 5 machines we still take 100 minutes?
We don't have an infinite number of machines irl?
What my solution looked liked after I failed initially and then put some thought into it:
1. 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes. Assuming it takes all 5 machines to make one whole donut (each prints out a part of it), they will make 1 donut in 1 minute.
2. In 100 machines, there is 20 sets of 5 machines. This many will make 20 donuts in 1 minute.
3. By dividing 100 donuts by 20, we get 5, thus finding that it would take 100 machines 5 minutes to make 100 donuts.
The question was really vaguely put. Does one machine take full five minutes to make a donut, or do all five machines make one detail of a donut? No wonder people are confused: with important information left out, it's hard to conceptualize the question.
Does each machine make a donut end to end , or the doughnut passes thru 5 machines in 5 steps to be completed
Man im acoustic but this comment thread specifically is a great example. I'm gonna have to show my wife next time she doesn't understand how specific she needs to make instructions for a task I'm unfamiliar with.
Even though I got the answer, I have noticed that when I'm forced to answer on the spot with no time to properly analyze the question or something, I end up getting close but I say the wrong answer.
Ofc, for those situations, they're more difficult. This one is just a trick question
First a question must be asked: Does each machine make one donut in five minutes. (or say one machine makes 5 donuts in 5 minutes, and the other 4 are idle?) OR( sequencially does the first machine prepare the ingredients(like measuring), and the second machine combines the ingredients, and the third machine forms the donuts into rings, the 4th machine places the 5 donuts onto the baking tray, and the 5th machine takes a picture) Should probably ask: are the machines identical? Were each of the 5 machines fully utilized to make the 5 donuts? NOTE: A hundred machines would make two thousand donuts in 100 minutes!!!
I knew the answer immediately as an observer, but I'd say if I was asked on the spot, I'd overthink it and assume my automatic answer was wrong. I second-guess myself too much
Of course you did lol
Word.
Same!
Sometimes watching these videos, it makes me feel like I'm not stupid after all
I know right I’m twelve and I got this question right immediately.
It makes me feel stupid I was convinced it was 1 minute
It's 5 minutes right?
@@thelegendofpro8038 yep. Each machine makes 1 donut in 5 minutes, so if there's 100 machines and you're looking for 100 donuts, it'll be 5 minutes.
@@thelegendofpro8038 Yeah
A donut is about the worst food you can ever eat.
The problem is they didn’t ask the follow-up clarifying question: did it take each machine five minutes to make a donut or does each machine take five minutes to make five donuts? The question is vaguely worded.
It takes them 2 weeks including one full weekend. The planner only requested 20 donuts worth of flour, the facility didn't factor for the increased power draw and most of the machines can't run... Additionally the drivers are on strike.
The first 3 batches of donuts all fail quality checks because the ramp up wasnt properly considered.
The workforce who run the machines are burnt out from having to adapt to the increased work with a rapidly diminishing skill level for all the new employees.
Lastly at the same time as producing more donuts the boss has decided that the output is now actually 20 cupcakes, 20 Victoria sponges, 60 pizzas and 10 high end hand bags.
😂😂😂
Ha ha ha
😂
You forgot "internal consumption."
Brilliant, sounds like someone from ops!
I figured it out in seconds but only because I was ready going in. If he stopped me on the street my brain would have melted like the others.
This comment has made many people feel better about themselves, myself included.
I’d like to ask the teacher out for a donut.
I think she’ll be thrilled. Leave your number
And teach her the most basic math skills too.
I can't imagine how bad the kids would be doing if teacher is THIS bad.
@@edinfific2576Then again, she may not be a math teacher.
@@edinfific2576 Bruh. It wasn't a math question.
Simp
Answer : 1minute
5machines = 5doughnuts = 5minutes
or
1machine = 1doughnut =1minute
The old guy be like: Common sense not so common ig 💀
Yeah it's 5 minutes anyways, I swear I thought I was the only one-💀
@@cosmyctaylorsversion 5
5
ah yes
so i am retard
No, that should be common sense.
If you ask me a question like that,in the middle of street with camera on my face, I'll not be able to tell my name correctly
Performing well while under pressure is not a skill equally distributed throughout humans.
and you call yourself "Ninja"?
It's "name a woman" syndrome
@@filmtajm35 if the camera is on a ninja he’s already failed
@@filmtajm35 part of the shinobi's training is to appear clueless strategically 🤫🤫🤫
My first thought was to ask if I could please have one of those donuts...
Ask me in 5 minutes. 😊
@@Colby753 You can't outsmart us, we know if we wait the extra 95 minutes we can have 100 donuts 🤣
@@aaroniousairlines9087
If there are any left you can.
We started eating them 94 minutes ago. 🤪
@@Colby753 Aw fudge! Please tell me you started the machines when you took the donuts out??? 😅
@@aaroniousairlines9087
I can not tell you that. I CAN tell you that we started the machines BEFORE we put them in, though.
Edit: Although they weren't actually doughnuts at that point... only ingredients.
5 minutes. The key fact to recognize is it takes 5 minutes for 1 machine to make 1 donut. So 100 machines will need 5 minutes to make 100 donuts. The amount of time to make a donut per machine never changes.
5 machines 5 donuts = 1 donuts per minute
100 machines = 1 donut every 0.6 seconds
100 donuts = 1 minute or 60 seconds.
"Oh is this maths ?"
-"No , it's history"
History has repeated itself
Luke Davidson
History has repeated itself
Unravelling the mystery
Donut history 🙂
Assuming all 100 machines can work at the same time, then 5 minutes.
You are correct. The variables on both sides of the equation were equal, so the missing variable would remain the same as prior.
Bro, if they make one doughnut per minute and you have 100 machines in one minute you’re gonna have 100 donuts
@@stevencooper4422wrong
It’s impossible to answer, you aren’t given enough information. Are all the machines the same and doing the same job? Or do they all work together to get one job done? Is it a conveyor system where all donuts enter the machine at the same time and not one by one?
You can assume, but that just makes an ass out of u (and me). You can never be sure without more info.
@@KM-rh4zl Stop playing dumb.
The correct answer is undefined, it’s not enough information. Is each machine producing 1 donut a minute or is each machine producing parts of the batter and one cooking? It’s could be several different answers
Honestly I think the old guy used his experience more, “you get the machines started, throw them in there” 😂 while the others tried to look intelligent in front of the camera doing some calculations
"10 minutes?"
"Not 10 minu-"
"Next person"
5 minutes
@@sagardahal4472 🤓🤓
@@sagardahal4472 There are multiple people btw
@@sagardahal4472 you are correct. When scrolling through CZcams, you come across these shorts & they catch you "off guard". The answer is glaringly obvious, but I didn't really realise till I saw your post. SCARY. What has the internet done to us ? What the hell are they teaching our kids ? Why didn't I realise till I saw your very simple & straight to the point answered ? 🤔🤔🤔
Guys I'm a genius! I figured out it's 5 minutes! 🤯🤯
The endorphin rush at the prospect of eating a delicious donut clouded their judgement
Real
How do you know how it tastes?
I'd be like just gimme the donuts.
It's 5 minutes.
"Wrong!😋"
5 minutes. Each machine makes 1 donut in 5 minutes on average.
If your ever want to solve a riddle, don't think it's complicated
Or rather be calm enough to engage, therefore spotting the essence of it.
So you've never seen Ted ed's riddles
until you encounter a complicated riddle...
One for you, a monkey climbs a oiled pole, he climbs 3 meters, then slides down 2 meter, the pole is 20 meters long, how many jumps would he need to make?
@@NoahLoftierI feel like that's the better advice lots of riddles you have to look at what is actually said.
It’s a trick questions because it can be attempted in two ways
One method is to think that 5 machines make 5 donuts in 5 minutes means that each individual machine is making 5 donuts in 5 minutes, equivalent of 1 donut per minute. That means a hundred machines would make 100 donuts in 1 minute as each machine makes 1 each in that minute.
Another way to think about it is that the 5 machines collectively make 5 donuts in 5 minutes, which would mean that each machine makes 1 donut each in those 5 minutes. A 100 machines would take 5 minutes to make a 100 donuts in this case as each of the machine makes 1 donut in the 5 min duration.
PS: my brain hurts
It's not a trick question.
It's actually a very simple, straightforward question.
It depends on if you can run all the machines starting at the same time, or if you have to load the raw dough into them sequentially, which takes time to do!
Active Listening is really a skill.
1 Machine takes 5 minutes to make 1 donut.
Now you see how it works?
He didn't say if they take 5min each or if they're collaborating to produce a donut in 5min.
The guy asking the question learned the answer from someone else.
Yes, from a teacher who may not have known the answer, but taught him good thinking skills so he could find the answer on his own.
@@droundyCubbyCertainly wasn’t a teacher. Anytime a teacher asked a question like that, it was a multiplication problem.
It’s actually the teachers and their use of questions in this format, that led to the wrong answers.
It's really sad that the reason most people get things like this wrong is that the instant it's asked they've already told themselves they're too dumb to get it
I had to think about it for a bit, but came to the right conclusion right before the answer was given
This reminds me of a magazine I used to read when I was in grade school. It always featured trick questions like that. I still remember some of them. It was a great way to teach children critical thinking. We need to bring that back.
I wouldn't call it a trick question, but I agree completely that questions like this are a great tool in helping teach critical thinking.
Highlights maybe?
Highlights or Weekly Reader maybe?
Not just for children, but also for adults like me.😂
We are in DESPERATE need of some Goofus and Gallant education these days!
This is less of an IQ question and more about having the skill to keep your cool in an interview-like situation.
Yes! Your comment needs more likes 😭
It’s neither. It’s the ability to answer test questions. How to remove all of the extraneous information to find the one number that you actually needed.
It's both.
@@neilkurzman4907No it's about reading the mind of a deliberately obscurely worded question.
@@spockskynet
That is what is said
Sometimes you just gotta use common sense but its hard not to feel like its a trick question when you have a mic in your face , also it just takes 5 minutes is the mood
If you got asked a random question by a random dude with a camera pointed at your face after being told it might go to the net, a lot of basic knowledge would slip your train of thoughts.
But these were tooo basic
@@arnav_1290r even the people in the comments get it wrong and they're not pressured by anything, if he asked what 2 plus 2 is then that's too basic.
@@GourmetPickle that just shows that people in 2023 lack common sense, except for the people who aren’t stupid
Well demographics come into play as well. Producer is being selective in multiple aspects. As for the people commenting, i think majority are a demographic figured by algorithms because they're most likely to make commotion in the comments
@@arnav_1290r Except not today. We no longer rely on mathematic notation as thought, but rather on calculators and other machines to help ease the burden. The result is that people can't think laterally, and have issues with these type of questions. The benefit is that we ease time between calculation, resulting in more efficient outputs.
The old guy is actually smart. Each machine takes 5 minutes to make a Donut, so 100 machines will make 100 Donuts in 5 minutes because they are doing it at the same time, not one after the other.
its 5 machines makes 5 donuts in 5 mins... you not listening...
@@arnoldasglobis1692 Are you stupid? you are not listening.
There ars 5 machines and they take 5 minutes to make 5 Donut, so each machine takes 5 minutes to make a Donut. They are not doing it one after the other, they are doing it at the same time. Which means 100 machines would take 5 minutes to make 100 Donuts.
@@arnoldasglobis1692 1 donut per machine every 5 minutes. If you have 100 machines, then it will be 100 donuts in 5 minutes.
He's not brilliant he just paid attention to the question lol
@@arnoldasglobis1692 He is listening, read again your own comment and you will see how each machine takes 5 minutes to make a donut
The question distracts you with thoughts of, "Yummy, doughnuts!"
Depends on the variables, did they work in parallel or series?
That old man is one wise Man to put his thoughts straight like that
And he's a older generation what a coincidence
Other: kicking and squeezing their brains for the answer
Meanwhile him: Enjoys the donut
They look pretty good tho