This is the best Freecad tutorial I have seen. I had been searching for that pocket operation but without knowing what it was called in Freecad. Thank you. Subscribed.
@@Adventuresincreation for me the learning curve is things that are nit obvious to get around. For instance, the lid. Using attachments and positions to relocate the lid. As i go through more vids, I’m sure I’ll be saying “how did he know how to do that !🤔 ✌️
After you create your labels in the spreadsheet, run the easy alias macro before entering any values. You can then enter formulas using the alias names instead of the cell location. In cell B17, you can enter =hole_diameter + 2 instead of =B8 + 2.
I have been using FreeCad for years and have learned more watching your videos than I have in all that time watching other videos. Your explanations are very clear. Thanks.
Just completed your box and lid tutorials :) Thanks a lot! This is what I am looking for to make my own electronics enclosures. I had an error initially when creating the lid. I did not have a Part containing the 2 Bodies as you used a macro initially to set up the project in the other video. Minor point. I figured that I had to create a Part and then move the 2 Bodies inside. Very clear instructions! Enjoying my FreeCAD journey thanks to you!
Great job on your tutorials! Your explanations are easy to follow, and I appreciate you including your mistakes along the way rather than being editted out. Learning how to fix the mistakes when they are discovered is just as important as the job itself.
This and the previous tutorial (drawing the box) are really helpful. It’s now 3 years later and on version 0.21.1 so there are differences but your tutorial is still easy to follow. I changed the lid height to 1 wall thickness and deleted the lidheight variable as a thin lid is my preference. Thanks for making it available to us.
Another super tutorial! The techniques you've covered in your box and lid tutorials are really helpful. I've learned a lot in a short amount of time. I greatly appreciate your efforts.
I followed along with the first tutorial making the box exactly as you did. For my lid, I made it one wall thickness tall. It goes down one wall thickness into the box and one wall thickness from from the inside of the box (plus clearance). I also copied the lug radius onto the lid. This means that 90% of the lid is only one wall thickness tall, so it prints quickly with no wasted plastic.
Great tutorials. The little mistakes you made are extra helpful too, showing how to recover from unexpected results. You've really flattened the Freecad learning curve for me.
Extremely complete tutorial, one of the best tutorials I have seen in this subject, enjoyed it a lot, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge, I hope that all of us that had such good learning will be willing to collaborate financially with you. Thank you so very much, greatly appreciated.
I am enjoying this leaning curve. I discovered that when constraining the corner radii, we can select all four and constrain the one. The remaining three are automatically set to equal. Saves me a step.
@@Whipster-Old I just download it from the download page, although I can build it with conda as I set that up too but I generally wait and get the posted version.
@@Adventuresincreation you might enjoy Chocolatey. Check out Chocolatey package manager, you can then install with "choco install freecad --pre". Easier to keep up to date than manually downloading those pre release builds by hand! NB I'm not affiliated with them, it's open source I just use it a lot.
@@Whipster-Old I did look at it but because I already have Conda installed and set up I can just build on demand from the latest repository. I may install Chocolatey in the future though. I am trying to develop some more "gui" based macros at the moment. I am having fun with Qt5 and creating stuff but nothing releasable yet.
Thanks for this. I followed along and made my box and now lid, first day using FreeCAD. I still don't know what I'm doing, but I know a lot more than I did this morning. And I have a box if I want to print one.
Similar to the other comments, your tutorials are super helpful thank you so much for taking the time to share knowledge! One trick you can use instead of pocket 'through all' is pocket 'to face' and select a face that you want the pocket to go to, just a bit more precise than through all
Thanks for the feedback, I have used the pocket to a face but generally hit it with a sledgehammer and go through all. - Your way has much more finesse ;-)
You are a great teacher. I was looking for a CAD Software and found FreeCad. The new good CAD-Programs are only for rent anymore. As a single-man-business in Germany I just can´t afford to pay 500 Euro per month for renting a CAD-software while my main business is calculating frames and using other software. This software is meant for Industry - some fulltime - drawers, who live in their element - with their shortcuts and their productivity. Anyway, I would like getting better at Freecad and the FEM - workbench. Thumbs up, you´re a great person having an english accent and living in the US. Freundliche Grüße, Niko Böhm
Thanks Niko. Let me know if I can help you with getting up to speed with FreeCAD. It is a great piece of software that is very capable. Are you just creating technical drawings or are you modeling and 3D printing or CNC routing?
but you are, I assume, an Ingeneer like me. In Germany they call it "Maschinenbauingenieur" ... and we have the differenciation to "Civil Engineer". So the civil engineer can construct a steel-frame-building but the "Machinenbauingenieur" not - they are working at Porsche and Mercedes.
Thanks for taking the trouble to teach 0.19 before it was published as stable. It means your video(s) hasn't lost relevance and shouldn't do for at least the rest of this year and probably not even then. It's great to see a lot of good tutorials being created now. When I started with FreeCAD a few years ago there wasn't a lot around, and most of those (that were well done) showed just the part workbench or switched between the two (what a headache). I had to transition to the part design workbench under my own steam but I'm learning heaps from these newer videos. Thanks again.
Thanks Chris. In fact, I did the same, I was trying to use FreeCAD as my daily driver and couldn't find many "good" videos then, I found Fusion 360 and saw the opportunity to use something a little more modern with a free hobbyist license. - In the meantime FreeCAD improved then AutoDesk decided to change the rules for the Fusion 360 hobbyist license. - I saw the writing on the wall and made the leap back to FreeCAD. I haven't looked back since. I love FreeCAD and how extensible it is. There are lots of things to learn with it but the main stay for me, the part design workbench and the sketcher are pretty good. I do use the path workbench and love where it's going although I wish I could help them to move along faster. - It is very capable for the basics but lacks some finesse. I am glad I can help others to use the software and hope that with 0.20 release I can make new videos that highlight those features too.
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks for the reply! You also asked if anyone had anything we'd like you to cover. It's a bit of a complex topic but I've been struggling with threads. I have done them from scratch and discovered that the open source algorithms for circle designs (cutting a spiral sweep with a thread profile) was very hit or miss. Often when you used the correct dimensions it failed to compute, but tweak it just a little off spec and it would work. Rounding errors that the algorithms couldn't resolve, obviously. The method I was using was to create a cylinder, and then use the thread profile to "cut" the thread. It seemed to be the recommended easiest and most reliable method at the time. I did find the "fasteners" add-on and started using that with very reasonable success. Because I design exclusively for 3D printing most of the threads are large and course: eg. a motor drive unit that pulls the filament out of the airtight containers I have it enclosed in, reducing drag on the direct drive print head (improved my 3D prints immensely) . I used a 3D printed M20 threaded bolt to hold the drive unit vise style on the back of the desk the printer is sitting on. The motor drive is a horrid looking design overall - the M20 bolt is the only thing that has any redeeming aesthetic LOL. So it's been powered on and working constantly for two years now. No need to re-design what just works. Threads are a complex topic (very specific design criteria) but maybe a tute on sweeps would be good, or maybe a discussion on the circles/sweeps algorithms. Since I started using the fasteners add-on two years ago I've basically forgotten everything I learned, and FreeCAD has become so much better so I wonder if there have been improvements in that area as well. Are they still using those clunky open source algorithms that caused me so much trouble back then?
@@Chrisamic take a look at my latest video it covers threads using the fasteners workbench. I would never bother to model a thread from scratch. There is a setting in the workbench for 3d printing threads. Also, take a look at my beginner video on sweeps along a path. That will help. It's also in the latest video.
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks, I'll definitely rummage through those videos!. If you want to understand threads, model them from scratch (or cut them on a lathe) but yes, the call of the threads workbench is very strong :-D
@@Chrisamic Coming from an engineering background, I have made many threads on the lathe but mostly used taps and dies that's why I love what the fastener workbench has. You can create a hole or a shaft, select a tap or die and just make the thread. It works really well and honestly takes all the pain out of creating threads.
Thank you! these two videos helped out a lot diving into FreeCAD/3d printing for the first time and learning that most all can be done using a spreadsheet!
Su video me aclaro todas las dudas que tenias y mucho mas, muy bien expicado y paso a paso. Excelente y mis felicitaciones por compartir con nosotros sus conocimiento, desde Iquique_ Chile un gran abrazo.
Thanks for the tutorial and it is a good one, especially the spreadsheet and the clearances. But I was thinking that maybe if you create a DatumPlane on the top of the box, then you could perhaps use that plane as a base for the lid (instead of the offset from the XY-plane).Then the lid and the box would be more "independent" of each other. (But I don't know if this would interfere with the mirror function or not).
excellent as usual.. @11:50, while making symmetrical, then adding radii constraint, i got error has partially redundant constraints. I deleted the constraint and selected all 4 radii and made equal. Then applied the radii constrint and everything is normal. Thankx for this increditable vid series on the project box.. No w i can modify (hopefully as new to #D modeling) the sizing to my needs and add 2 tabs on the lid to attached to my cymbals.🙏👌👍
aaah i jumped ahead to make them equal, but later @12:25, you mentions you should have made them equal. I guess in version .20.1 flags the error that i had.
Great videos, brings home the benefits of parametric designs, very well explained. You mentioned the possibility of adding this to an assembly, would be great to see that. Would also love to see something with print in place hinges on a box, can't find a full demo for freecad anywhere. Can't place your accent, doesn't sound American, dare I say more British ? Thanks for the time you put in to help out a beginner.
Thanks for the feedback. You nailed the accent. I am English, I have lived in the USA for about 20 years now. I print in place hinge sounds fun. I use A2plus for assemblies, I can definitely show how I do that.
Very very helpful tutorial. Please help us with the screws you plan to use. Do you have a part number or other mechanical details? How much thread engagement is there, that sort of thing.
superb tutorial!!!! is it possible to control the chamfer parametrically if created on a sketch or incorporated in the spreadsheet to constrain its movement in relation to the hole?
Fantastic, so easy (lol). You spend 30 minutes talking, I spend 8 eight (3 times) trying to do. Finally managed, thanks to pause. Now I'd like the lug at the top tapering to the base, or to the length of the screw (plus a bit), so don't waste space for the board. Also want to add mount points for the PCB. However this is all fancy stuff. The question I have is, can FreeCAD allow multiple Sketches in one project and allow to disable for printing. This way I can use a common template with multiple objects. So one print may include an exhaust outlet for a fan, while another hold a battery container below the PCB, thus needing to raise the lugs holding the PCB, but all with the same calculated dimensions. So so many possibilities. Keep up the good work. It's clear and concise. I will watch more.
Hey there, many thanks for these 2 electronics enclosure videos. I have used this as a base for an arcade joystick that I would like to print at some point. For me, the "lid" of the enclosure becomes the joystick's base, so I have the "top" and "bottom" concepts reversed in my file. I would like to ask if you can show in a future video the easiest way to add cosmetic features on an edge (e.g. text/shapes that you can pad/pocket). Also, I just subscribed, congratulations on eventually hitting 1,000 subs in a few days, keep up the good work.
@@Adventuresincreation Many thanks my friend, I'm looking forward to it. My design will follow the design of an early 90's joystick. The most challenging feature for me will be to add chamfers like the one the original gameboy has at the bottom right. To the best of my understanding the gameboy's chamfer at the bottom right is not just cosmetic but is placed there for ergonomic reasons. Image of (legendary) Aneroussis Pac-Man joystick: 20thcenturyvideogames.com/Consolas/AneroussisControl/accesorios/AneroussisControlPac-Man.jpg
I took a quick look at this. If you use a datum plane to align your chamfers then use make a "thick solid" you will end up with a box that has those chamfers in it.
Absolutely brilliant videos. I am totally new to Freecad, but this has made things so easy. I followed the previous video on the enclosure design and made my own Freecad file. I exported the .stl file for the body and it printed nicely. Then I did the same for the lid. After a few "glitches" regarding Freecad file types, naming, tree, etc, printing the lid worked just as well. Since that success, I have tried to alter the design to include a semicircular groove in both the top face of the body (and also into its corresponding lid underside) to accommodate a sealing o-ring all without success. I have tried using the "groove" and the "fillet" tools, but no go. The "groove" tool is limited to grooving circular objects only. Is that correct ? There appears to be no option to invert the "fillet' tool once chosen, in order to create the semicircular channel that I need for my o-ring. Also, the lid is very thick once printed. Again, I need to know how to "pocket" the lids existing inner face, so that its inside thickness is only "spreadsheet.wall_thickness" deep. Because of the Topological Naming Problem already known, is it safer to set up a "virtual plane" on the same axis as the top face of the box, and create a new sketch on that ? I fear that I might be getting in a bit over my depth with this, or are you interested in creating another video to assist "dummies like me" ? Irrespective of any reply, please keep up your excellent work. I will continue to "like" your channel regardless.
You might want to look at the sweep along a curve and yes, use an offset plane or offset sketch to hollow out the lid. It sounds like you are learning fast!
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks so much for the hasty reply - but I still have trublems. I will try the lid "hollow out" a bit later, but for now, I can't seem to grasp how to "sweep along a curve". I have created two sketches under "Multi Transform" (1 for the profile cross section {on the xz axis}, and another for the path which the profile should take {on the xy axis}). The "Part Design" and "Part" toolboxes behave differently, so which to choose (and when) ? If I use "Part Design", after selecting "Sweep a selected sketch along a path or to other profiles and remove it from the body", I never get the chance to select a face in "Pipe Parameters". There is only a blank "Object" field there. Why do I not get a chance to insert my second sketch as that object's path for it to follow ? What should be easy has become far from that. Do I use the "Part" toolbox, or the "Part Design" toolbox, as they appear to behave quite differently here. The FreeCAD site (and help) seem to not cover any of this. P.S. I am using the latest v0.19.
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks for pointing me to that video - very helpful. Still got issues, though. I have made 2 valid, constrained sketches, which have placed themselves under the "Multi Transform" branch of the tree (or is that wrong ?). One is the o-ring profile, the other is the path. However, when I try to set up a subtractive pipe, I get an error saying "Pipe: No valid sketch or face as first section". My question is: on which axes should the cross-section profile be drawn, and should it be on a plane other than that used fo the path sketch ? I've tried everything, over many hours, and about to sling it in the "too hard" basket. More help is desperately needed, please.
@@kevingpearce yes, the profile sketch has to be on a different plane to the path. Imagine the shape traveling along the path, if it is laying flat you won't get the shape you want
I have yet to draw this but I am really enjoying your videos. New subscriber! Would the wall clearance eventually cause the hole to puncture the edge? More clearance seems like it would break in being the hole has to be in the same spot as the box. I guess I could answer my own question once I draw it.
hi I would like information on the software that wood help me to make verious items with plams table, other equip, like lathe , mill machine, this will help me alot thanks for any information Larry
This is a very useful video for me. Thanks a lot. I have some confusion about when to use "hole" or "pocket" though. In video, at 16:32 you say, quote "...put some holes through this box..." unquote, At 18:34 you say, quote " ...do a pocket through all...", unquote. I would like to understand when to use what (hole or pocket)? I am asking this because when I try to reproduce the hole in the lid, no matter what I try, the hole or the pocket, it goes only through the "lid top" or the "lid padding". Never through both. Any tip about overcoming this problem? Thanks for your help in advance. By the way, I am using FreeCAD version 0.20.2.
I use pocket 99% of the time. The pocket can only go through the body in which the sketch is located. If you need a hole in a different body, create another sketch.
Really good tutorial, easy to follow! I follow your steps and made a parametric box with lid and it works fine. Since I have a PrusaMini with only180x180 mm printing bed I can't do a box sized for my need. Can you design a parametric box with a middle section which can be printed out separately and somehow attached to the other parts? Very grateful if you can take your time to help me.
@@Adventuresincreation 1. Cut the box and lid in the middle so that they can be printed separately. 2. Make a center sections, with equal profile, that can be inserted between the cut pieces. 3. The pieces should be able to be locked to each other.
@@janhellstrom4165 I will look at it and see what I can come up with. I am not sure why we are adding a center piece, if we were to model it in two parts wouldn't we just print the center piece in place? It seems that you want to accommodate a larger box on your smaller printer, is that right?
@@Adventuresincreation Just now I have 3d-printed the hinges you designed in your last tutorial. The result is amasing. I did not know that it is possible to print moving parts in one piece, cool! Regarding the box. Yes, I wanted to print three parts, each with the maximum length of 180 mm, that gives a box of 540 mm total length, but it's ok to skip the center part and make two pieces with length180 mm each for a 360 mm box. It a simpler solution and I can print one more set if I need. I need the box for my CNC-machine, now I have all the electronics around the machine.
Great tutorial. Thank you! If you don't mind, I have one general question, but will ask it in reference to the screw hole created on the XY-plane @ 16:41: ÜWhy do you place this sketch on the XY, and not on the lid-layer?* Will this cause problems later on, if the lid height/width is modified? Shouldn't it be OK, because the sketch would move with the lid layer, as it now moves it's position due to the calculations for the positioning?
To make the lid, could you not make a copy of the initial body, and modify it to make the lid? Unless I missed something, the sketch is basically the same, no?
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks. I still have to go through #1-41. 🙂I jumped on this one because I do need to make a box for a project and your tutorial was just what I was looking for.
Both video's are really excellent, thank you very much. I do have one question though. You create all sketches based on the base XY plane and then move the objects (wall_thickness e.d.) why not use a datum plane?
@@jj_uk the plane will not cause the topological naming issue if you do not tie it a face. If you instead, index it from another plane it will be robust.
Quick question, I went thru the box tutorial, then this one. Much success and now I have a nice box. My problem is that when I change something, say box height, the box bottom changes height correctly but the lid stays where it was. It's sketches move up appropriately but the solids (pads pockets, etc.) remain fixed where they were when created. I can't figure out why. Any ideas? Also, thanks for the videos, they really helped me learn to like FreeCad a lot. I used Catia 4 & 5 years ago at work and FC seems a lot like it with respect to workflow with the huge advantage that I can use it at home... and there's a KiCad workbench! Amazing!
I’m struggling so bad trying to get to grips with freecad. I’m absolutely certain it’s me, as I struggle with any sort of technology. Would you consider designing something like this for my son’s ashes, and how much would you charge if so? Kind regards.
I’ve only started with FreeCAD today. May I ask probably a stupid question: Why when adding the holes to the lid is it a “new sketch” ? This is something I’m finding hard with FreeCAD. Why couldn’t, for example, the holes be added to the lid sketch? The very first sketch you did on this video? What am I missing ? Thanks anyone in advance 🙏
@@Adventuresincreation yeah it wasn’t t criticism. It was more a question about, how does this translate to tool paths for CNC if it’s multiply sketches? Or does that simply not matter because once it’s saved, using 1 or multiple sketches, the tool paths don’t care? Steep leaving curve. And I’ve been developing embedded C, Java and software for 30 years. This is all new to me.
Hmmm… this is where i get connected. To add 2 tabs on the lid, can’t add to sketch003 or create another sketch because a tab will be another solid which is not supported. What approach do i take? I can create another body and sketch. If the tab is a rectangle, how is it attached to the lid horizontally as part of the lid? Probably wrong approach 🤔 thankx
@@Adventuresincreation hi yes. Can another part be added to the lid? I tried with adding another body but how do i attach it to the lid? Or do i need to modify the sketch003 ? 🤔
@@Adventuresincreation aaah was wondering why those operations are used for. After doing some reading, after .16 versions, the object has to be contiguous and removed multisolids. I’ll try boolean 😨. I check out your boolean tutorial 👌
In the Windows 10 freeCAD .19 version 24291 I found that there must be a default radius size, if I select the fillet and just select the box corner a radius is created. Then all 4 corners are created the same size (but only equal by coincidence), you still have to further constrain them. (Sorry - I said radius constraint and meant fillet - corrected!) Now if I can just figure out why the pad only made a lid rim and not like your picture. :) It looks like a square rubber band! :( Nothing in the center. I must have skipped a step.
@@Adventuresincreation I think many of my problems arise from not having the focus? on the correct place/plane (always the xy) but not the correct place in the parts lineup - if that makes sense. I finally got the pads right on the lid (I think) but now the hole only goes through the inside lid pad even though I clicked through all as you showed. This is confusing since I started the sketch as you did I think - top view. I have a CarveWright and use the designer it comes with and when you click on a line in the sketch or click on an object on the left parts list box it is highlighted in both places. I don't find that happening for me in freeCAD. Also I am having problems getting objects to hide/unhide and if I do my focus seems to change at times.
@@davidpanetta5492 it's probably just a matter of getting used to it. You should be able to select any part /body from the model tree and then hit the spacebar to toggle it on and off.
@@Adventuresincreation Thats what I thought, but when I click on parts in the tree, then the space bar, nothing happens most times. When it works and I click back to the part I am working on, if I click back to the hidden part and hit space, it often will not become visible again. Assuming my model is ok, something I am doing is wonky.
It depends what type of screw you are using. If you use self-tapping screws you can just make the hole to right size and drive the screw in. If you want to use a machine screw then you will have to model the thread in the hole.
I don't get it. I'm very familiar with 2d CAD, but I can't even get past drawing a square and centering and dimensioning in this frustrating program. If I follow the tutorial, many if the of the menus he shows aren't visible, I can't seem to select anything etc. Even following his steps one by one, some things simply don't work.
Initially I had this problem too. The default configuration for the toolbars looks very different on my laptop to that shown in your videos (may be screen size dependant?) If you haven't already produced one, perhaps a video showing how to reproduce something similar to your setup?
Great videooo!!!!! I have made an enclosure thanks to that . I would like to know if there are more steps in the cura part. Because my preview shows some red part and I don't know how to deal with it? What should I do ?
@@Adventuresincreation When I try to see the preview of the enclosure lid. It shows the screw hole in red color. And I don't know how can I add "supports" in these part. Do you have any video of that type to lead us in the cura please? It would be great
I'm stuck again, I have moved the box lid to the top of the box (perfect) when I create a sketch, the XY plane is on the bottom of the box not the lid. any suggestions?
Hi Danny, you can offset the sketch in the Z direction by closing the sketch, click on it in the model tree then in the data block at the bottom change its attachment. That should move the sketch to whatever you want it.
@@Adventuresincreation i have created the lid off set so that means i have 2 sketches to move on the Z axes now? This isn't working i have to deconstruct my drawing just to put holes in the lid. This dog is loosing the trail!
I have created a pocket, but the hole is only in the "lid offset" not the lid. Changing the pocket parameters doesn't make any changes. It's like the lid and the offset are two different drawings that just happens to be next to each other.
hi everyone, I am having a problem transitioning from the drawn box to drawing the lid, the box wont disappear from the work bench so i can draw the lid. I am using v0.19. I have watched the video frame by frame and i can find the step on how the box is selected, i see the wire frame around the edges but my drawing doesn't do that the hole box is selected and turns green. I can select a body create a sketch but the box does not go away so i can draw the lid. any help would be appreciated.
@@Adventuresincreation I figured out the problem I had to select the body and press the space bar to make the main body disappear. My lid is on the top of the box, I still have to create the holes and the ridge. Thank you so much for your help. Danny.
Brilliant tutorial! Very useful ... step by step guidance. Keep up the good work :-)
Thanks for the feedback Tony.
This is the best Freecad tutorial I have seen. I had been searching for that pocket operation but without knowing what it was called in Freecad. Thank you. Subscribed.
Excellent! Thanks
FreeCAD has a daunting learning curve, and your tutorials are gold.
Thanks I appreciate the feedback. If there is something you would like me to cover, I would be more than happy to do so. Just leave a comment.
@@Adventuresincreation for me the learning curve is things that are nit obvious to get around. For instance, the lid. Using attachments and positions to relocate the lid. As i go through more vids, I’m sure I’ll be saying “how did he know how to do that !🤔 ✌️
After you create your labels in the spreadsheet, run the easy alias macro before entering any values. You can then enter formulas using the alias names instead of the cell location. In cell B17, you can enter =hole_diameter + 2 instead of =B8 + 2.
Thanks for the tip.
I have been using FreeCad for years and have learned more watching your videos than I have in all that time watching other videos. Your explanations are very clear. Thanks.
I am glad they have been helpful.
Thanks for these excellent videos. I'll second the comment on leaving the mistakes in and showing how to fix them.
Great, I still do that !
Such an excellent tutorial. Made me aware of the spreadsheet workbench.
Except: what a raucuous voice, you would be an excellent sargeant-major.
Get yourself on parade you 'orrible little man 😀
Just completed your box and lid tutorials :) Thanks a lot! This is what I am looking for to make my own electronics enclosures.
I had an error initially when creating the lid. I did not have a Part containing the 2 Bodies as you used a macro initially to set up the project in the other video. Minor point. I figured that I had to create a Part and then move the 2 Bodies inside.
Very clear instructions! Enjoying my FreeCAD journey thanks to you!
Excellent, glad you enjoyed it.
Great job on your tutorials! Your explanations are easy to follow, and I appreciate you including your mistakes along the way rather than being editted out. Learning how to fix the mistakes when they are discovered is just as important as the job itself.
Thanks for the feedback
i've been teaching myself FreeCad for a few months now, Your tutorials are really easy to follow, I love the pace and the content! bravo.
Thanks, I really appreciate the feedback
This and the previous tutorial (drawing the box) are really helpful. It’s now 3 years later and on version 0.21.1 so there are differences but your tutorial is still easy to follow. I changed the lid height to 1 wall thickness and deleted the lidheight variable as a thin lid is my preference. Thanks for making it available to us.
Thanks, maybe I will make the video again using the latest version.
Thanks for your videos.
If you select all archs, before fixing the radio, FreeCAD automatically applies the equality constraint.
Thanks for the tip. I appreciate the feedback.
Another super tutorial! The techniques you've covered in your box and lid tutorials are really helpful. I've learned a lot in a short amount of time. I greatly appreciate your efforts.
Thanks Greg, I am planning a video on constraining sketches this week.
I followed along with the first tutorial making the box exactly as you did. For my lid, I made it one wall thickness tall. It goes down one wall thickness into the box and one wall thickness from from the inside of the box (plus clearance). I also copied the lug radius onto the lid. This means that 90% of the lid is only one wall thickness tall, so it prints quickly with no wasted plastic.
Brilliant!
Great tutorials. The little mistakes you made are extra helpful too, showing how to recover from unexpected results. You've really flattened the Freecad learning curve for me.
Glad it was helpful!
Extremely complete tutorial, one of the best tutorials I have seen in this subject, enjoyed it a lot, thank you so much for sharing your knowledge, I hope that all of us that had such good learning will be willing to collaborate financially with you. Thank you so very much, greatly appreciated.
Thanks for the feedback
I am enjoying this leaning curve. I discovered that when constraining the corner radii, we can select all four and constrain the one. The remaining three are automatically set to equal. Saves me a step.
Yeah, the thing I like about it, it's improving all the time. There are some great developers working on it.
@@Adventuresincreation are you installing it manually, or with Chocolatey?
@@Whipster-Old I just download it from the download page, although I can build it with conda as I set that up too but I generally wait and get the posted version.
@@Adventuresincreation you might enjoy Chocolatey. Check out Chocolatey package manager, you can then install with "choco install freecad --pre". Easier to keep up to date than manually downloading those pre release builds by hand! NB I'm not affiliated with them, it's open source I just use it a lot.
@@Whipster-Old I did look at it but because I already have Conda installed and set up I can just build on demand from the latest repository. I may install Chocolatey in the future though. I am trying to develop some more "gui" based macros at the moment. I am having fun with Qt5 and creating stuff but nothing releasable yet.
Thanks for this. I followed along and made my box and now lid, first day using FreeCAD. I still don't know what I'm doing, but I know a lot more than I did this morning. And I have a box if I want to print one.
I am glad you were able to follow along. You can repurpose this approach for many parametric designs.
Similar to the other comments, your tutorials are super helpful thank you so much for taking the time to share knowledge!
One trick you can use instead of pocket 'through all' is pocket 'to face' and select a face that you want the pocket to go to, just a bit more precise than through all
Thanks for the feedback, I have used the pocket to a face but generally hit it with a sledgehammer and go through all. - Your way has much more finesse ;-)
Hehe, it can also cause circular dependency issues if your not careful, sledgehammer is good too 🙃
You are a great teacher. I was looking for a CAD Software and found FreeCad.
The new good CAD-Programs are only for rent anymore.
As a single-man-business in Germany I just can´t afford to pay 500 Euro per month for renting a CAD-software while my main business is calculating frames
and using other software. This software is meant for Industry - some fulltime - drawers, who live in their element - with their shortcuts and their productivity.
Anyway, I would like getting better at Freecad and the FEM - workbench.
Thumbs up, you´re a great person having an english accent and living in the US.
Freundliche Grüße,
Niko Böhm
Thanks Niko. Let me know if I can help you with getting up to speed with FreeCAD. It is a great piece of software that is very capable. Are you just creating technical drawings or are you modeling and 3D printing or CNC routing?
but you are, I assume, an Ingeneer like me.
In Germany they call it "Maschinenbauingenieur" ...
and we have the differenciation to "Civil Engineer". So the civil engineer can construct a steel-frame-building but the "Machinenbauingenieur" not - they are working at Porsche and Mercedes.
@@Adventuresincreation No - I´d like to print small stairs and bridges mainly in steel.
AGAIN (as with the box) AMAZINGLY CLEAR instructions and hints ! Thank you so much !!!
You are welcome
Thanks for taking the trouble to teach 0.19 before it was published as stable. It means your video(s) hasn't lost relevance and shouldn't do for at least the rest of this year and probably not even then.
It's great to see a lot of good tutorials being created now. When I started with FreeCAD a few years ago there wasn't a lot around, and most of those (that were well done) showed just the part workbench or switched between the two (what a headache). I had to transition to the part design workbench under my own steam but I'm learning heaps from these newer videos. Thanks again.
Thanks Chris. In fact, I did the same, I was trying to use FreeCAD as my daily driver and couldn't find many "good" videos then, I found Fusion 360 and saw the opportunity to use something a little more modern with a free hobbyist license. - In the meantime FreeCAD improved then AutoDesk decided to change the rules for the Fusion 360 hobbyist license. - I saw the writing on the wall and made the leap back to FreeCAD. I haven't looked back since. I love FreeCAD and how extensible it is. There are lots of things to learn with it but the main stay for me, the part design workbench and the sketcher are pretty good. I do use the path workbench and love where it's going although I wish I could help them to move along faster. - It is very capable for the basics but lacks some finesse. I am glad I can help others to use the software and hope that with 0.20 release I can make new videos that highlight those features too.
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks for the reply! You also asked if anyone had anything we'd like you to cover. It's a bit of a complex topic but I've been struggling with threads. I have done them from scratch and discovered that the open source algorithms for circle designs (cutting a spiral sweep with a thread profile) was very hit or miss. Often when you used the correct dimensions it failed to compute, but tweak it just a little off spec and it would work. Rounding errors that the algorithms couldn't resolve, obviously. The method I was using was to create a cylinder, and then use the thread profile to "cut" the thread. It seemed to be the recommended easiest and most reliable method at the time.
I did find the "fasteners" add-on and started using that with very reasonable success. Because I design exclusively for 3D printing most of the threads are large and course: eg. a motor drive unit that pulls the filament out of the airtight containers I have it enclosed in, reducing drag on the direct drive print head (improved my 3D prints immensely) . I used a 3D printed M20 threaded bolt to hold the drive unit vise style on the back of the desk the printer is sitting on. The motor drive is a horrid looking design overall - the M20 bolt is the only thing that has any redeeming aesthetic LOL. So it's been powered on and working constantly for two years now. No need to re-design what just works.
Threads are a complex topic (very specific design criteria) but maybe a tute on sweeps would be good, or maybe a discussion on the circles/sweeps algorithms. Since I started using the fasteners add-on two years ago I've basically forgotten everything I learned, and FreeCAD has become so much better so I wonder if there have been improvements in that area as well. Are they still using those clunky open source algorithms that caused me so much trouble back then?
@@Chrisamic take a look at my latest video it covers threads using the fasteners workbench. I would never bother to model a thread from scratch. There is a setting in the workbench for 3d printing threads. Also, take a look at my beginner video on sweeps along a path. That will help. It's also in the latest video.
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks, I'll definitely rummage through those videos!. If you want to understand threads, model them from scratch (or cut them on a lathe) but yes, the call of the threads workbench is very strong :-D
@@Chrisamic Coming from an engineering background, I have made many threads on the lathe but mostly used taps and dies that's why I love what the fastener workbench has. You can create a hole or a shaft, select a tap or die and just make the thread. It works really well and honestly takes all the pain out of creating threads.
Top notch tutorial setting out a very useful project which also deals with multiple parts and the important demonstration of parametric modelling.
Thanks.
One of the best tutorials!
Thanks!
Thank you! these two videos helped out a lot diving into FreeCAD/3d printing for the first time and learning that most all can be done using a spreadsheet!
Glad it was helpful! - The spreadsheet driven models are very powerful.
@@Adventuresincreation VERY got me to move to FreeCAD over fusion 360
@@OZtwo Excellent!
You are an excellent teacher, well explained
In my opinion your tutorial's are the best on FreeCAD ... keep them coming !
Thanks, I really appreciate the feedback. I am working on the next one. I am going to answer some of the questions I have received.
Thank you for an excellent two part tutorial - this has been incredibly useful!
I am glad you enjoyed it
Once again - an excellent tutorial. Thank you.
You are welcome
It is amazing how you did it. Thanks for sharing your experience with us. I will try to do it if I can.
You are welcome
Su video me aclaro todas las dudas que tenias y mucho mas, muy bien expicado y paso a paso. Excelente y mis felicitaciones por compartir con nosotros sus conocimiento, desde Iquique_ Chile un gran abrazo.
De nada Eduardo. Espero que encuentres los videos fáciles de seguir y muy informativos.
Fantastic tutorial. Really useful. Thank you very much.
You are welcome 😉
I really enjoyed this. Thanks,
Great 👍 glad you enjoyed it
Nice tutorial! Help me a lot. Thank you for sharing.
You are welcome 😉
Thanks for the tutorial and it is a good one, especially the spreadsheet and the clearances. But I was thinking that maybe if you create a DatumPlane on the top of the box, then you could perhaps use that plane as a base for the lid (instead of the offset from the XY-plane).Then the lid and the box would be more "independent" of each other. (But I don't know if this would interfere with the mirror function or not).
Sounds like an interesting approach
Great and super tutorial, You are an excellent teacher.. thx.
Glad you think so!
excellent as usual.. @11:50, while making symmetrical, then adding radii constraint, i got error has partially redundant constraints. I deleted the constraint and selected all 4 radii and made equal. Then applied the radii constrint and everything is normal. Thankx for this increditable vid series on the project box.. No w i can modify (hopefully as new to #D modeling) the sizing to my needs and add 2 tabs on the lid to attached to my cymbals.🙏👌👍
aaah i jumped ahead to make them equal, but later @12:25, you mentions you should have made them equal. I guess in version .20.1 flags the error that i had.
Glad I did that 😉
I guess this means im getting a liitle more knowlegdble from your videos 🤔 🙄
@@rondeangelis7384 absolutely!
Excellent thank you!
Thanks
¡Gracias!
You are welcome
Very nice tutorial thank you so much
You are welcome 😊
Great videos, brings home the benefits of parametric designs, very well explained. You mentioned the possibility of adding this to an assembly, would be great to see that. Would also love to see something with print in place hinges on a box, can't find a full demo for freecad anywhere. Can't place your accent, doesn't sound American, dare I say more British ?
Thanks for the time you put in to help out a beginner.
Thanks for the feedback. You nailed the accent. I am English, I have lived in the USA for about 20 years now. I print in place hinge sounds fun. I use A2plus for assemblies, I can definitely show how I do that.
@@Adventuresincreation Well done, 20 years and still English :-) Look forward to your video on assemblies and your take on the hinge. Thanks
Awesome tutorial !!! Very well done . Your explanations are excellent !!
Thanks!
If you use wall thickness as the lid height the lid works better.
Glad that works for you
Again a great tutorial.
Thanks again!
Excellent work sir! I'm learning a lot from you, thanks a lot!
Thanks, you are very welcome
Very very helpful tutorial. Please help us with the screws you plan to use. Do you have a part number or other mechanical details? How much thread engagement is there, that sort of thing.
Honestly, I just use stuff I have laying around
Found a useful looking document at
www.stanleyengineeredfastening.com/-/media/web/sef/resources/docs/other/threaded_fasteners_for_plastics.ashx
Excellent tutorials! I’ve learned so much from you.
Thanks for the feedback
Thanks for that tutorial.
You are welcome!
Awesome. Great tutorial. Thank you.
You are welcome
Am using two monitors and putting the stuff on the left monitor
I think that's a great idea.
Another great video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Brilliant stuff
Thanks Nick
Great tutorial! Thanks! I made a modification to the lid. Any way to show it?
Do you mean show the modification in the video? Or just share it with others? You can put a link to it in the comments here
superb tutorial!!!! is it possible to control the chamfer parametrically if created on a sketch or incorporated in the spreadsheet to constrain its movement in relation to the hole?
Yes, you can set parameters for the chamfer too.
Thank you this helped me
Glad it helped
Fantastic, so easy (lol). You spend 30 minutes talking, I spend 8 eight (3 times) trying to do. Finally managed, thanks to pause.
Now I'd like the lug at the top tapering to the base, or to the length of the screw (plus a bit), so don't waste space for the board. Also want to add mount points for the PCB. However this is all fancy stuff. The question I have is, can FreeCAD allow multiple Sketches in one project and allow to disable for printing. This way I can use a common template with multiple objects. So one print may include an exhaust outlet for a fan, while another hold a battery container below the PCB, thus needing to raise the lugs holding the PCB, but all with the same calculated dimensions. So so many possibilities.
Keep up the good work. It's clear and concise. I will watch more.
The answer to your question is definitely yes!
Why don't you use the hole and countersink option, but use pocket and chamfer instead? Great tutorials.
There's always more than one way to skin a cat ;-)
Hey there, many thanks for these 2 electronics enclosure videos. I have used this as a base for an arcade joystick that I would like to print at some point. For me, the "lid" of the enclosure becomes the joystick's base, so I have the "top" and "bottom" concepts reversed in my file.
I would like to ask if you can show in a future video the easiest way to add cosmetic features on an edge (e.g. text/shapes that you can pad/pocket).
Also, I just subscribed, congratulations on eventually hitting 1,000 subs in a few days, keep up the good work.
Thanks for the feedback, I will be happy to show how you can add features at an edge. It will be utilizing offset sketches or datum planes.
@@Adventuresincreation Many thanks my friend, I'm looking forward to it.
My design will follow the design of an early 90's joystick. The most challenging feature for me will be to add chamfers like the one the original gameboy has at the bottom right. To the best of my understanding the gameboy's chamfer at the bottom right is not just cosmetic but is placed there for ergonomic reasons.
Image of (legendary) Aneroussis Pac-Man joystick:
20thcenturyvideogames.com/Consolas/AneroussisControl/accesorios/AneroussisControlPac-Man.jpg
That looks like a fun build
I took a quick look at this. If you use a datum plane to align your chamfers then use make a "thick solid" you will end up with a box that has those chamfers in it.
Good vary good
Thanks for the feedback
Absolutely brilliant videos. I am totally new to Freecad, but this has made things so easy. I followed the previous video on the enclosure design and made my own Freecad file.
I exported the .stl file for the body and it printed nicely. Then I did the same for the lid. After a few "glitches" regarding Freecad file types, naming, tree, etc, printing the lid worked just as well.
Since that success, I have tried to alter the design to include a semicircular groove in both the top face of the body (and also into its corresponding lid underside) to accommodate a sealing o-ring all without success.
I have tried using the "groove" and the "fillet" tools, but no go.
The "groove" tool is limited to grooving circular objects only. Is that correct ?
There appears to be no option to invert the "fillet' tool once chosen, in order to create the semicircular channel that I need for my o-ring.
Also, the lid is very thick once printed. Again, I need to know how to "pocket" the lids existing inner face, so that its inside thickness is only "spreadsheet.wall_thickness" deep.
Because of the Topological Naming Problem already known, is it safer to set up a "virtual plane" on the same axis as the top face of the box, and create a new sketch on that ?
I fear that I might be getting in a bit over my depth with this, or are you interested in creating another video to assist "dummies like me" ?
Irrespective of any reply, please keep up your excellent work. I will continue to "like" your channel regardless.
You might want to look at the sweep along a curve and yes, use an offset plane or offset sketch to hollow out the lid. It sounds like you are learning fast!
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks so much for the hasty reply - but I still have trublems. I will try the lid "hollow out" a bit later, but for now, I can't seem to grasp how to "sweep along a curve". I have created two sketches under "Multi Transform" (1 for the profile cross section {on the xz axis}, and another for the path which the profile should take {on the xy axis}). The "Part Design" and "Part" toolboxes behave differently, so which to choose (and when) ?
If I use "Part Design", after selecting "Sweep a selected sketch along a path or to other profiles and remove it from the body", I never get the chance to select a face in "Pipe Parameters".
There is only a blank "Object" field there. Why do I not get a chance to insert my second sketch as that object's path for it to follow ?
What should be easy has become far from that. Do I use the "Part" toolbox, or the "Part Design" toolbox, as they appear to behave quite differently here.
The FreeCAD site (and help) seem to not cover any of this. P.S. I am using the latest v0.19.
Take a look at this video, it demonstrates what you need. czcams.com/video/Px1bkazmFH8/video.html
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks for pointing me to that video - very helpful. Still got issues, though. I have made 2 valid, constrained sketches, which have placed themselves under the "Multi Transform" branch of the tree (or is that wrong ?). One is the o-ring profile, the other is the path. However, when I try to set up a subtractive pipe, I get an error saying "Pipe: No valid sketch or face as first section". My question is: on which axes should the cross-section profile be drawn, and should it be on a plane other than that used fo the path sketch ? I've tried everything, over many hours, and about to sling it in the "too hard" basket. More help is desperately needed, please.
@@kevingpearce yes, the profile sketch has to be on a different plane to the path. Imagine the shape traveling along the path, if it is laying flat you won't get the shape you want
I have yet to draw this but I am really enjoying your videos. New subscriber! Would the wall clearance eventually cause the hole to puncture the edge? More clearance seems like it would break in being the hole has to be in the same spot as the box. I guess I could answer my own question once I draw it.
Thanks for subscribing, if you make it tiny I imagine you can get it to break through
hi I would like information on the software that wood help me to make verious items with plams table, other equip, like lathe , mill machine, this will help me alot thanks for any information Larry
I am sorry, I don't have equipment information try looking on Reddit r/cnc
Can't you just project other body geometry onto the sketch like you do in F360? It saves so much time while keeps design parametric.
Yes you can
Köszi!
You are welcome!
This is a very useful video for me. Thanks a lot. I have some confusion about when to use "hole" or "pocket" though.
In video, at 16:32 you say, quote "...put some holes through this box..." unquote, At 18:34 you say, quote " ...do a pocket through all...", unquote.
I would like to understand when to use what (hole or pocket)?
I am asking this because when I try to reproduce the hole in the lid, no matter what I try, the hole or the pocket, it goes only through the "lid top" or the "lid padding". Never through both.
Any tip about overcoming this problem? Thanks for your help in advance.
By the way, I am using FreeCAD version 0.20.2.
I use pocket 99% of the time. The pocket can only go through the body in which the sketch is located. If you need a hole in a different body, create another sketch.
Really good tutorial, easy to follow!
I follow your steps and made a parametric box with lid and it works fine.
Since I have a PrusaMini with only180x180 mm printing bed I can't do a box sized for my need. Can you design a parametric box with a middle section which can be printed out separately and somehow attached to the other parts?
Very grateful if you can take your time to help me.
I would love to help. Can you explain what the middle part should look like? I am sure we could create a parametric insert.
@@Adventuresincreation
1. Cut the box and lid in the middle so that they can be printed separately.
2. Make a center sections, with equal profile, that can be inserted between the cut pieces.
3. The pieces should be able to be locked to each other.
@@janhellstrom4165 I will look at it and see what I can come up with. I am not sure why we are adding a center piece, if we were to model it in two parts wouldn't we just print the center piece in place?
It seems that you want to accommodate a larger box on your smaller printer, is that right?
@@Adventuresincreation Just now I have 3d-printed the hinges you designed in your last tutorial. The result is amasing. I did not know that it is possible to print moving parts in one piece, cool!
Regarding the box.
Yes, I wanted to print three parts, each with the maximum length of 180 mm, that gives a box of 540 mm total length, but it's ok to skip the center part and make two pieces with length180 mm each for a 360 mm box. It a simpler solution and I can print one more set if I need.
I need the box for my CNC-machine, now I have all the electronics around the machine.
Great tutorial. Thank you! If you don't mind, I have one general question, but will ask it in reference to the screw hole created on the XY-plane @ 16:41: ÜWhy do you place this sketch on the XY, and not on the lid-layer?* Will this cause problems later on, if the lid height/width is modified? Shouldn't it be OK, because the sketch would move with the lid layer, as it now moves it's position due to the calculations for the positioning?
Good question, before this latest dev release the topological naming issue caused problems of you used the model face.
To make the lid, could you not make a copy of the initial body, and modify it to make the lid? Unless I missed something, the sketch is basically the same, no?
You certainly can do that, take a look at #42 and #43 for ideas on how to do this.
@@Adventuresincreation Thanks. I still have to go through #1-41. 🙂I jumped on this one because I do need to make a box for a project and your tutorial was just what I was looking for.
@@ve2evn543 No worries, they are on demand ;-)
Both video's are really excellent, thank you very much. I do have one question though. You create all sketches based on the base XY plane and then move the objects (wall_thickness e.d.) why not use a datum plane?
Thanks for the feedback. You can do it both ways. It's whatever you prefer.
@@jj_uk the plane will not cause the topological naming issue if you do not tie it a face. If you instead, index it from another plane it will be robust.
Quick question, I went thru the box tutorial, then this one. Much success and now I have a nice box. My problem is that when I change something, say box height, the box bottom changes height correctly but the lid stays where it was. It's sketches move up appropriately but the solids (pads pockets, etc.) remain fixed where they were when created. I can't figure out why. Any ideas? Also, thanks for the videos, they really helped me learn to like FreeCad a lot. I used Catia 4 & 5 years ago at work and FC seems a lot like it with respect to workflow with the huge advantage that I can use it at home... and there's a KiCad workbench! Amazing!
Not sure why your lid is not changing. If the sketches are, you may need to hit the refresh button... It's like two blue arrows
I followed the CZcams film , but when I change for example the lenght of the lid , the box will stay the same. How can I solve this problem ?
Carefully check that you have assigned the dimensions spreadsheet values.
when i copy the spreadsheet ,then i can adjust the lid and the box individual , but not simultaneously
@@franknaets1370 You should be able to modify the spreadsheet and any dimensions linked to it will change.
I’m struggling so bad trying to get to grips with freecad. I’m absolutely certain it’s me, as I struggle with any sort of technology. Would you consider designing something like this for my son’s ashes, and how much would you charge if so?
Kind regards.
Do you just want a box like that or something more ornate?
@@Adventuresincreation I was hoping to create a box similar to this, but with scrip engraved onto it, and maybe a few refining touches.
@@christophercroft9824 I can send you the file if that helps
I’ve only started with FreeCAD today. May I ask probably a stupid question:
Why when adding the holes to the lid is it a “new sketch” ?
This is something I’m finding hard with FreeCAD. Why couldn’t, for example, the holes be added to the lid sketch? The very first sketch you did on this video?
What am I missing ?
Thanks anyone in advance 🙏
Hi Graham, if you make the holes part of the first sketch they will be through holes. There are many ways to skin a cat
@@Adventuresincreation yeah it wasn’t t criticism. It was more a question about, how does this translate to tool paths for CNC if it’s multiply sketches?
Or does that simply not matter because once it’s saved, using 1 or multiple sketches, the tool paths don’t care?
Steep leaving curve. And I’ve been developing embedded C, Java and software for 30 years. This is all new to me.
@@GrahamDIY you can create tool paths around your model so how you got there isn't as important.
Did you have any printing issues with the wall thickness around the lid screw holes: it looked pretty tight in places!
No issues whatsoever. It's parametric so you can change it 😉
Very usefull ! But I miss your button or mouse click on screen info, for example I had problem with hiding Part and it`s just Spacebar button.
It's back in all the videos. To be honest, sometimes I forget to switch it on. 😉
@@Adventuresincreation Good to know! It's making your videos even better :) BTW. I made the lid with you today :D Nice work
Hmmm… this is where i get connected. To add 2 tabs on the lid, can’t add to sketch003 or create another sketch because a tab will be another solid which is not supported. What approach do i take? I can create another body and sketch. If the tab is a rectangle, how is it attached to the lid horizontally as part of the lid? Probably wrong approach 🤔 thankx
Btw, rectangle also will have through pocket for screw to attach box
Wouldn't the tab be connected to the lid though?
@@Adventuresincreation hi yes. Can another part be added to the lid? I tried with adding another body but how do i attach it to the lid? Or do i need to modify the sketch003 ? 🤔
@@rondeangelis7384 if you created a new body, use a boolean operation to add them together
@@Adventuresincreation aaah was wondering why those operations are used for. After doing some reading, after .16 versions, the object has to be contiguous and removed multisolids.
I’ll try boolean 😨. I check out your boolean tutorial 👌
In the Windows 10 freeCAD .19 version 24291 I found that there must be a default radius size, if I select the fillet and just select the box corner a radius is created. Then all 4 corners are created the same size (but only equal by coincidence), you still have to further constrain them.
(Sorry - I said radius constraint and meant fillet - corrected!)
Now if I can just figure out why the pad only made a lid rim and not like your picture. :) It looks like a square rubber band! :( Nothing in the center. I must have skipped a step.
Maybe one of your pads is in the wrong direction. The size of the radii depends on where you pick points as you add it.
@@Adventuresincreation I think many of my problems arise from not having the focus? on the correct place/plane (always the xy) but not the correct place in the parts lineup - if that makes sense. I finally got the pads right on the lid (I think) but now the hole only goes through the inside lid pad even though I clicked through all as you showed. This is confusing since I started the sketch as you did I think - top view.
I have a CarveWright and use the designer it comes with and when you click on a line in the sketch or click on an object on the left parts list box it is highlighted in both places. I don't find that happening for me in freeCAD. Also I am having problems getting objects to hide/unhide and if I do my focus seems to change at times.
@@davidpanetta5492 it's probably just a matter of getting used to it. You should be able to select any part /body from the model tree and then hit the spacebar to toggle it on and off.
@@Adventuresincreation Thats what I thought, but when I click on parts in the tree, then the space bar, nothing happens most times. When it works and I click back to the part I am working on, if I click back to the hidden part and hit space, it often will not become visible again. Assuming my model is ok, something I am doing is wonky.
thank you for the excellent tutorial. I have a question, if I want to use a M3 bolt or screw, do I need to add a thread in the hole?
It depends what type of screw you are using. If you use self-tapping screws you can just make the hole to right size and drive the screw in. If you want to use a machine screw then you will have to model the thread in the hole.
@@Adventuresincreation ah i see, thank you for the answer sir.
Why don't you use Shape Binder to create the lid?
Because I wanted to keep it simple, you can check out my shape binder video if you are interested in that.
@@Adventuresincreation I will do that. I very much appreciate your style.
How do I get the FreeCAD worktable downloaded?
See my other comment
I don't get it. I'm very familiar with 2d CAD, but I can't even get past drawing a square and centering and dimensioning in this frustrating program. If I follow the tutorial, many if the of the menus he shows aren't visible, I can't seem to select anything etc. Even following his steps one by one, some things simply don't work.
Do you have the same version as in the video? Some of the icons may be obscured if you haven't spread them out.
Initially I had this problem too. The default configuration for the toolbars looks very different on my laptop to that shown in your videos (may be screen size dependant?) If you haven't already produced one, perhaps a video showing how to reproduce something similar to your setup?
Great videooo!!!!!
I have made an enclosure thanks to that . I would like to know if there are more steps in the cura part. Because my preview shows some red part and I don't know how to deal with it? What should I do ?
Can you be more specific?
@@Adventuresincreation When I try to see the preview of the enclosure lid. It shows the screw hole in red color. And I don't know how can I add "supports" in these part. Do you have any video of that type to lead us in the cura please? It would be great
Unfortunately I do not, I use the prusa slicer.
Nice. Sub’d 👍
Thanks!
I'm stuck again, I have moved the box lid to the top of the box (perfect) when I create a sketch, the XY plane is on the bottom of the box not the lid. any suggestions?
Hi Danny, you can offset the sketch in the Z direction by closing the sketch, click on it in the model tree then in the data block at the bottom change its attachment. That should move the sketch to whatever you want it.
@@Adventuresincreation i have created the lid off set so that means i have 2 sketches to move on the Z axes now? This isn't working i have to deconstruct my drawing just to put holes in the lid. This dog is loosing the trail!
I have created a pocket, but the hole is only in the "lid offset" not the lid. Changing the pocket parameters doesn't make any changes. It's like the lid and the offset are two different drawings that just happens to be next to each other.
@@dannyperkins4220 can you share your file?
what screws should i get for this enclosure
It's completely parametric, you can make the holes any size to fit whatever screws you have.
Disculpa crees que me puedas pasar esos archivos,es que necesito crear una caja asi para un proyecto de mi uni
My Patrons have free access to the files or you can purchase them from www.patreon.com/adventuresincreation/shop
hi everyone, I am having a problem transitioning from the drawn box to drawing the lid, the box wont disappear from the work bench so i can draw the lid. I am using v0.19. I have watched the video frame by frame and i can find the step on how the box is selected, i see the wire frame around the edges but my drawing doesn't do that the hole box is selected and turns green. I can select a body create a sketch but the box does not go away so i can draw the lid. any help would be appreciated.
Try going to the model tab on the left hand side. Click on the box then press the spacebar. That should hide it.
Thank you it worked one time but i could not select the work plane. I do not have a (new part) icon under the (electronics_box) icon.
@@dannyperkins4220 can you share your file and I will take a look at it to see if I can help.
@@Adventuresincreation I figured out the problem I had to select the body and press the space bar to make the main body disappear. My lid is on the top of the box, I still have to create the holes and the ridge. Thank you so much for your help. Danny.
@@dannyperkins4220 glad you got it to work. Looks like you are well on your way.
Can I download the source file of the box?
Do you mean the freecad file?
@@Adventuresincreation Yes, but I learned it. I don't need to download it. Thank you
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Thanks!
impossible to go to the enf due to forcing rotting voice.
Huh?